China’s J-10 fighter jet, particularly the advanced J-10C variant, has become a focal point in the international arms market, with Pakistan emerging as the primary and, to date, only confirmed export customer.

The Pakistan Air Force (PAF) has formally inducted the J-10C into its fleet, with a total of 25 units expected to be delivered from China.

This acquisition is widely regarded as a significant enhancement of Pakistan’s military capabilities, especially in air defense, and is strategically aimed at counterbalancing India’s recent military advancements, including its procurement of French Rafale jets .

The induction ceremony for the J-10C took place at Kamra Airbase on March 11, 2022, attended by then Prime Minister Imran Khan, underscoring the political and strategic importance of the deal .

**Countries Purchasing or Considering the J-10** Pakistan is the only country with a confirmed purchase and operational deployment of the J-10C.

The PAF’s order of 25 J-10C fighters marks the most concrete export success for the J-10 series to date .

The aircraft, also known as the "vigorous dragon," is seen as a major upgrade over Pakistan’s existing fleet, including the JF-17, and is expected to significantly enhance the country’s air combat and air defense capabilities .

No other countries have been confirmed as buyers of the J-10, although China actively promotes the jet at international arms fairs and exhibitions, such as Airshow China 2021, suggesting ongoing efforts to secure additional export customers .

In the Middle East, there are no confirmed sales of the J-10 to countries such as Saudi Arabia or the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

However, both nations are diversifying their military partnerships and have shown increasing interest in Chinese military technology.

The UAE, for example, has been identified as a potential location for Chinese military logistics facilities, indicating a deepening military relationship that could eventually include aircraft such as the J-10 .

The global arms market’s increased demand, especially in the Middle East, and the desire of regional countries to modernize their air forces may create future opportunities for J-10 sales, but as of now, no formal agreements have been reported .

**Feedback from Buyers and Military Analysts** Feedback from the PAF and Chinese military analysts regarding the J-10C has been largely positive.

Pakistani military officials and analysts highlight the aircraft’s agility, advanced avionics, and the integration of modern radar systems, such as the active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, as key advantages .

The J-10C is classified as a 4.5-generation fighter, which significantly improves the PAF’s combat effectiveness and operational capabilities compared to older models like the JF-17 .

The aircraft’s ability to carry advanced air-to-air missiles, including the PL-10 and PL-15, is seen as a substantial upgrade, enhancing Pakistan’s aerial combat capabilities and regional defense posture .

Chinese analysts have praised the defense cooperation between China and Pakistan, emphasizing that the J-10C’s induction is a strategic move that strengthens Pakistan’s military capabilities while promoting Chinese aviation technology .

The J-10C is described as a more powerful option compared to the JF-17, and its larger size allows for more advanced radar systems and weaponry .

The PAF views the J-10C as a crucial addition, especially as its fleet of F-16s becomes increasingly outdated, and considers the J-10C’s advanced avionics and weaponry vital for countering regional threats, particularly from India .

While direct, detailed user reviews from other buyers are limited due to the lack of additional export customers, the operational deployment of J-10s by China in military exercises and patrols suggests a high level of confidence in the platform’s capabilities .

However, some concerns have been raised by defense enthusiasts and analysts regarding the J-10’s performance relative to Western and Russian fighters.

These concerns often focus on Chinese manufacturing quality, technological maturity, and the long-term reliability of the aircraft, leading to mixed opinions about its overall effectiveness .

**Media Commentary on Quality and Performance** Media and defense analysts have extensively commented on the J-10’s quality and performance.

The J-10C is widely described as a competitive 4.5-generation multi-role fighter jet, representing a significant technological advancement over older models like the JF-17 .

Its advanced avionics, larger airframe, and AESA radar are frequently highlighted as features that enhance its detection, targeting, and combat effectiveness .

The aircraft’s performance in air shows and military exercises, including joint drills with Russia and other partners, has been cited as evidence of its reliability and operational capability .

The J-10’s operational use extends beyond export sales.

It has been actively involved in Chinese military exercises, particularly around Taiwan, where it participates in regular patrols and maneuvers.

For example, in March 2023, 19 J-10 fighters were reported in Taiwan’s air defense zone, demonstrating the aircraft’s readiness and strategic importance in regional security .

The J-10’s deployment in these contested regions signals China’s growing military capabilities and commitment to supporting allied nations .

Media reports have also highlighted the strategic implications of Pakistan’s acquisition, noting that it not only strengthens Pakistan’s air force but also enhances China’s position in the global arms market .

The cooperation between China and Pakistan in defense matters is viewed as a significant factor in regional security dynamics, with the J-10C’s induction seen as a move that shifts the balance of air power in South Asia .

Commentators have compared the J-10C favorably against other regional fighter jets, such as the Rafale, highlighting its advanced technology, stealth features, maneuverability, and combat effectiveness .

However, some analysts and media sources have expressed concerns about the overall quality and reliability of Chinese military aircraft, including the J-10.

Issues such as engine performance, radar capabilities, and manufacturing standards are cited as potential limitations affecting operational performance .

The reliance on Russian engines, in particular, has been highlighted as a possible constraint on the J-10’s operational effectiveness .

Additionally, incidents involving J-10 jets, such as a near-miss with an Australian Navy helicopter, have raised questions about the professionalism of PLA operations and the potential risks associated with the use of J-10 jets in sensitive areas .

Despite these concerns, the J-10 is generally viewed as a capable and modern multi-role fighter that enhances both China’s and Pakistan’s air combat capabilities.

Its presence at international arms fairs and its active deployment in military exercises contribute to its growing profile in the global fighter jet market .

The J-10’s role in China’s broader military modernization efforts and its strategic use in regional security dynamics ensure it remains a focal point in discussions on military procurement worldwide .

**Geopolitical and Strategic Implications** The sale of J-10C jets to Pakistan is part of China’s broader strategy to strengthen defense ties with key regional partners and enhance its influence in South Asia.

This move supports Pakistan’s military modernization while promoting Chinese aviation technology and arms exports in a region traditionally influenced by U.S.

and Russian equipment .

The J-10’s deployment in sensitive areas like the Taiwan Strait and its role in military exercises underscore its importance in China’s military posturing, aimed at asserting territorial claims, deterring perceived threats from the U.S.

and its allies, and signaling China’s readiness to defend its interests in contested regions .

In summary, the export market for China’s J-10 fighter jets is currently centered on Pakistan, which has received 25 J-10C aircraft with positive assessments from analysts and officials.

The jet’s operational use in China’s military exercises, incursions, and joint drills with other nations further underscores its strategic and tactical value.

Media and expert commentary generally recognize

China’s J-10 fighter jet, particularly the advanced J-10C variant, has become a focal point in the international arms market, with Pakistan emerging as the primary and, to date, only confirmed export customer.

China’s J-10 fighter jet, particularly the advanced J-10C variant, has become a focal point in the international arms market, with Pakistan emerging as the primary and, to date, only confirmed export customer.

China’s J-10 fighter jet, particularly the advanced J-10C variant, has become a focal point in the international arms market, with Pakistan emerging as the primary and, to date, only confirmed export customer.

The Pakistan Air Force (PAF) has formally inducted the J-10C into its fleet, with a total of 25 units expected to be delivered from China.

The Pakistan Air Force (PAF) has formally inducted the J-10C into its fleet, with a total of 25 units expected to be delivered from China.

The Pakistan Air Force (PAF) has formally inducted the J-10C into its fleet, with a total of 25 units expected to be delivered from China.

This acquisition is widely regarded as a significant enhancement of Pakistan’s military capabilities, especially in air defense, and is strategically aimed at counterbalancing India’s recent military advancements, including its procurement of French Rafale jets .

Title:

Content: China maps out new provocation; renames 15 places in Arunachal Pradesh

Arunachal Pradesh has always been, and will always be an integral part of India, External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Arindam Bagchi said in response to a media query

New Delhi, First Published Dec 30, 2021, 9:29 PM IST

Even as the troops of the two neighbouring countries are locked in a standoff in eastern Ladakh since over 20 months, China has once again upped the ante against India by renaming 15 places in Arunachal Pradesh which it has been claiming as part of its south Tibet region. Prior to this, China's Ministry of Civil Affairs had renamed six places in 2017.

It is pertinent to mention that the latest renaming bid comes ahead of the implementation of China's new border law from January 1. Clearly, the changes have been made to buttress its claim on the northeastern state of India. According to the China's Civil Affairs Ministry, among the 15 places that have been renamed, eight are residential areas, four are mountains, two are rivers and one is a mountain pass.

India, meanwhile, has rejected the claims made by Beijing. Arunachal Pradesh has always been, and will always be an integral part of India, External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Arindam Bagchi said in response to a media query, adding that assigning invented names to places in Arunachal Pradesh does not alter this fact.

The National People's Congress gave its approval to the new Land Border Law on October 23 that will come into effect on Saturday. Chinese experts are of the view that the renaming of places in India's northeastern state is a legitimate move and sovereign right to give them standardized names. "More standardized place names in the region will be announced in the future," the Chinese government official mouthpiece Global Times said.

China has been claiming 90,000 sqkm areas of Arunachal Pradesh as part of its territory and calls it Zangnan or south Tibet. Time and again, New Delhi has rejected Beijing's claim and stated that Arunachal Pradesh was an integral part of India.

Talking to Asianet Newsable, security expert Major General Ashok Kumar (Retd) said, "Once these names appear on the map of Arunachal Pradesh, it will form part of an expanded cartographic aggression towards the larger aim of consolidating its claimed areas."

Maj Gen Kumar stated that New Delhi should lodge a formal complaint, not only with China but other concerned international organisations to desist Beijing from doing so. He also called upon New Delhi to revisit its boundary issues and consolidate its claims by developing infrastructure on a mission mode, settlement of border areas with civilian population, cartographic consolidation, mountaineering expeditions and other such boundary-claiming actions without further delay.

"A study to look at the issue holistically is the need of the hour," the former Indian Army officer said.

Also Read: Frustrated by poor Chinese weapons, Pakistan mulls asking United States for V-BAT 128 UAS

Also Read: Spooked by India's Rafale jets, Pakistan buys full squadron of 25 J-10C fighters from China

Follow Us:
Download App:

Title:

Content: Categories
News

Which is better F-35 or J 20?

Which is better F-35 or J-20?

In the world of military aviation, the competition between aircraft manufacturers is fierce. Two of the most advanced and highly debated fighter jets are the F-35, developed Lockheed Martin, and the J-20, designed China’s Chengdu Aerospace Corporation. Both aircraft boast impressive capabilities, but which one is truly superior? Let’s delve into the details and compare these cutting-edge fighters.

The F-35, also known as the Lightning II, is a fifth-generation stealth multirole fighter. It was developed to meet the requirements of the United States and its allies, offering advanced stealth capabilities, superior situational awareness, and a wide range of mission capabilities. The aircraft’s advanced technology and versatility have made it a popular choice among many nations.

On the other hand, the J-20, China’s first fifth-generation fighter, is a formidable competitor. It features advanced stealth capabilities, long-range capabilities, and a large payload capacity. The J-20 is designed to counter advanced enemy aircraft and dominate the skies, showcasing China’s growing military prowess.

FAQ:

Q: What does “stealth capabilities” mean?
A: Stealth capabilities refer to an aircraft’s ability to evade detection radar and other sensors, making it difficult for enemy forces to track and engage the aircraft.

Q: What is a fifth-generation fighter?
A: A fifth-generation fighter is a classification for advanced fighter aircraft that possess advanced stealth, sensor fusion, and network-centric warfare capabilities.

Q: Which aircraft is more widely used?
A: The F-35 is currently more widely used, with several countries, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Japan, operating the aircraft. The J-20 is primarily used the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Air Force.

Q: Which aircraft is more technologically advanced?
A: Both aircraft are considered highly advanced, but the F-35 has been in development for a longer period and benefits from extensive research and testing. However, the J-20 incorporates some unique features and technologies, showcasing China’s advancements in military technology.

In conclusion, determining which aircraft is better, the F-35 or J-20, is a complex task. Both fighters possess impressive capabilities and have their own strengths and weaknesses. Ultimately, the superiority of one over the other depends on specific mission requirements and the preferences of the countries operating them.

Title:

Content: PLA Air force's development briefed at Airshow China 2021

Source
China Military Online
Editor
Wang Xinjuan
Time
2021-09-30 18:45:35
WZ-8 drone is displayed at the Airshow China 2021. (Photo/Xinhua)

By Li Jincheng and Li Jianwen

ZHUHAI, Sept. 30 -- The Chinese People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) held a press conference on September 29 during the 13th China International Aviation & Aerospace Exhibition (Airshow China) and introduced its development in recent years.

According to Lieutenant General Wang Wei, deputy commander of PLAAF, the J-20, Y-20, new type of UAVs, special-purpose combat planes, and a range of ground-based air defense weapons and new types of radars all joined the exhibition, fully demonstrating the PLAAF’s capability and confidence to defend the national air and space security, safeguard national unity, and contribute to the world peace.

Major General Wang Zhilong, deputy director of the PLAAF’s Equipment Department, said that the air force has conducted equipment development and capability enhancement targeted at plateau and maritime operations, giving a strong impetus to regular oceangoing and high-altitude training.

When introducing modified fighter jets such as the J-10C and J-16D, Wang explained that the J-10C is a multi-purpose fighter jet modified from J-10 with much improved overall combat efficiency, while the J-16D is a new type of electronic warfare aircraft (WEA) independently developed based on J-16 fighter jet. Following the guiding thought of “one generation in exploration, one generation under research, and one generation in service”, the PLAAF is developing weapons and equipment in a sustained, healthy and orderly manner toward the goal of building a world-class strategic air force that’s fully capable of protecting national sovereignty, security and development interests.

Tang Changhong, chief designer of the Y-20, explained that as a large multi-purpose transport plane integrating strategic and tactical performance, the Y-20 has accomplished all kinds of tasks since it was commissioned. It has basically met the design expectations and will continue to exert its value through constant improvements. Tang also said that Y-20 has had test flights with homemade engines and recorded exceptional performance.

Related News

Continue...

The induction ceremony for the J-10C took place at Kamra Airbase on March 11, 2022, attended by then Prime Minister Imran Khan, underscoring the political and strategic importance of the deal .

Which countries' airforces are the purchasers of China's J-10 FIghter?

**Countries Purchasing or Considering the J-10** Pakistan is the only country with a confirmed purchase and operational deployment of the J-10C.

**Countries Purchasing or Considering the J-10** Pakistan is the only country with a confirmed purchase and operational deployment of the J-10C.

**Countries Purchasing or Considering the J-10** Pakistan is the only country with a confirmed purchase and operational deployment of the J-10C.

The PAF’s order of 25 J-10C fighters marks the most concrete export success for the J-10 series to date .

An advanced export model of J-10 Fighter

Which countries' airforces are the purchasers of China's J-10 FIghter?

An advanced export model of J-10 Fighter

Which countries' airforces are the purchasers of China's J-10 FIghter?

The aircraft, also known as the "vigorous dragon," is seen as a major upgrade over Pakistan’s existing fleet, including the JF-17, and is expected to significantly enhance the country’s air combat and air defense capabilities .

No other countries have been confirmed as buyers of the J-10, although China actively promotes the jet at international arms fairs and exhibitions, such as Airshow China 2021, suggesting ongoing efforts to secure additional export customers .

Title:

Content: Aug 10, 2021
JERUSALEM WEATHER

Share this article

On Monday, China and Russia held joint military exercises and for the first time, they were hosted on Chinese soil. The five-day event will be held in the city of Qingtongxia, in China’s northern Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region.

Following the development, the connection to the war of Gog and Magog is now being made by rabbis with one who interprets the prophet Ezekiel to foresee the War of Gog and Magog being launched by Russia.

Russia and China: a growing alliance

The event clearly was intended to have political overtones as well as military utility as it began with a gesture of friendship as the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Lieutenant General Liu Xiaowu, deputy commander of the Western Theater Command and commanding officer of Chinese forces in the upcoming exercise, presenting a bouquet of flowers to members of the Russian military delegation. Though this was the first exercise held inside China, it was the fourth joint Sino-Russian military exercise, after the Vostok (East) 2018, Tsentr (Center) 2019, and Kavkaz (Caucasus) 2020 exercises, all of which were held inside Russia.

The exercise will continue until Friday. The drill is significant, establishing a joint command center and involving approximately 10,000 personnel utilizing different types of aircraft, weaponry, equipment, and vehicles from both countries. The drill will feature China’s stealth fighter jet, the Chengdu J-20, also known as Mighty Dragon, marking the first time the PLA has sent the J-20 in joint drills with another country. According to press releases from both Chinese and Russian sides, Russian personnel was provided with the PLA’s Type 11 wheeled assault guns and Type 08 infantry fighting vehicles, marking the first time that China’s military will share its main battle equipment with the Russian troops. The drill is touted as being focused on improving the interoperability of the two armies.

Rabbi Winston: “Hashem flexing his muscles”

Rabbi Pinchas Winston, who is cogent in the Jewish sources pertaining to Moshiach and Jewish eschatology, stated, “When I heard about this exercise, I knew it was Hashem flexing his muscles.”

“It is God showing that He moves the pieces around. Men can try to show their strength but now, more than ever, with the pandemic and with massive flooding in China and Europe and all the other natural catastrophes, God is showing that ultimately, he is the one running the show. This is preparation for the end of days when He will be One and His name will be One.”

Rabbi Winston pointed out that any activity in the past that appeared to be a precursor to the pre-Messiah Gog and Magog war was precisely that; a precursor.

“The difference here is the timing,” Rabbi Winston said. “The Shemitah (sabbatical) year begins in one month. The Talmud explicitly states that the Shemitah is a difficult time and even a time of war. That is because Shemitah is a test of faith; can you sit and watch your fields lie fallow, believing that Hashem is in charge.”

Gog and Magog: Three wars, Shemitah

Rabbi Winston noted that according to Jewish sources, Gog and Magog will be a process of three wars. Rabbi Yisroel Kagan, a preeminent Torah authority known as the Chofetz Chayim who passed away in 1933 (after WWI but prior to WWII) stated that WWI was the first stage and that two more global conflicts would complete the process of Gog and Magog.

“That is why Shemitta is a time of war. People are choosing sides. It is the ancient cry of ‘who is for Hashem, come to me’. Before Gog and Magog, the world will be polarized along that line. And people who do not answer the call, it is because they can’t even see Hashem. They have never looked for Him. They think that doctors are running the pandemic, that politicians are running the government, that the armies win the wars.”

“Messiah comes after the Shemitta because Shemitta is all about faith in God, showing that He is in control. After showing faith in the Shemitta and after the war in the Shemitta year, everything is ready for Moshiach (Messiah) to appear in the following year, the eighth year.”

“Gog and Magog will not be a regular war about territory or power. It will be a war between those who can believe in God, who have always seen Him as running the world, against those who have never seen God as running the world.”

Rabbi Winston noted that society is clearly prepared for this.

“All of the events in the past year have pushed people even more into taking positions on how they stand in relation to Hashem. God wants to bring a true judgment with no excuses or doubts.”

Another rabbi, who preferred to remain anonymous, noted that the sixth year just prior to the Shemittah was a time of increased strife in order to increase faith.

“This year, troubles and catastrophes have come to Israel and to other nations in a most unusual way. It is not just that many of the troubles were extreme in magnitude and scale, like the pandemic and global flooding, but it is also notable that they came in quick succession. No sooner does one trouble end than another begins.”

“The message is that you shouldn’t wait until Rosh Hashanna and Yom Kippur to repent. The call has gone out to repent before the Shemitta kicks in.”

Russia and China as Gog and Magog

Russia’s role in multinational military exercises takes on apocalyptic implications when considering verses that identify the pre-Messiah War of Gog and Magog which, according to the prophet Ezekiel, will be a war against Israel fought by a multi-nation coalition led by a nation from the north.

Therefore prophesy, O mortal, and say to Gog: Thus said Hashem: Surely, on that day, when My people Yisrael are living secure, you will take note, and you will come from your home in the farthest north, you and many peoples with you—all of them mounted on horses, a vast horde, a mighty army. Ezekiel 38: 14-15

One interpretation of the Bible has Russia at the head of the multi-national army of the pre-Messiah War of Gog and Magog. Rabbi Haim Shvili, a 20th-century Jewish mystic wrote a book of predictions concerning the Messiah in 1935. Remarkably, Rabbi Shvili understands the prophet Ezekiel to foresee the War of Gog and Magog as being launched by a Russian-led coalition.

O mortal, turn your face toward Gog of the land of Magog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal. Prophesy against him Ezekiel 38:2

Rabbi Shvili understood the Hebrew word in the verse for ‘chief’ is rosh. Rabbi Shivli used this verse to identify Russia to be the leader of the Gog and Magog coalition. The rabbi emphasized that Gog is referred to as the “land of the North”, and Russia is the northernmost country in Europe. He also identified “Meshech” and “Tubal” as the Balkan states, which are ruled by Russia. Rabbi Shvili predicted that the Russian-led coalition will be opposed by a coalition of comparable size, comprising soldiers from all 70 nations.

China also has a connection with Magog. The Mongolian Empire once included sections of Russia, China, and North Korea. The Chinese and all the minority groups living in China are of the Mongoloid race, which stems from Noah’s son Japheth. Etymologists have conjectured that the name Mongol is derived from the name Magog.

The Bible may also contain an anachronistic reference to China.

I will pour out my anger upon Sin, the stronghold of Egypt, and I will destroy the wealth of No. I will set fire to Egypt; Sin shall writhe in anguish and No shall be torn apart; and Noph [shall face] adversaries in broad daylight Ezekiel 30:15-16

In modern Hebrew, ‘Sin’ (סין) is the name for China.

Russia and China: growing military cooperation

Russia is increasing its military readiness and at the beginning of the year, the Russian Defense Ministry announced that Russia would participate in nine military exercises with foreign troops in 2021, hosting eight of them. Much of this focus on the military was turned towards China. China and Russia held their first joint military exercise in 2003 and have conducted more than 30 since.

Russia and China will have another chance to practice military cooperation at the International Army Games later this month. The Russian Defense Ministry reported on Sunday that a separate contingent of Russian military personnel flew along with equipment to China to take part in three International Army Games competitions to be held in Korla of China’s northwestern Xinjiang Autonomous Province. Other events will be held in Russia, where Chinese troops recently arrived with China with various materiel.

Again, in September, China and Russia will train together alongside India, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan as part of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization’s Peace Mission 2021 drills. The drills were organized under the banner of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), a Eurasian security bloc led by Russia and China.

According to many media sources citing Chinese and Russian sources, the main impetus for the recent joint military enture was the Biden administration’s sudden withdrawal from Afghanistan which they fear endangers regional peace and stability and will lead to the development of terrorist forces in the region.

It should be noted that Turkey, which was granted dialogue partner status in the SCO’s 2012 summit in Beijing, hosted China in a week-long joint air force exercise in 2010. The incident garnered international consternation as Turkey is a NATO member. Relations between the two countries have been strengthened since the election of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in 2014.

What are the consequences of the problems that China's J-10 Fighters have?

In the Middle East, there are no confirmed sales of the J-10 to countries such as Saudi Arabia or the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

In the Middle East, there are no confirmed sales of the J-10 to countries such as Saudi Arabia or the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

In the Middle East, there are no confirmed sales of the J-10 to countries such as Saudi Arabia or the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

However, both nations are diversifying their military partnerships and have shown increasing interest in Chinese military technology.

However, both nations are diversifying their military partnerships and have shown increasing interest in Chinese military technology.

However, both nations are diversifying their military partnerships and have shown increasing interest in Chinese military technology.

The UAE, for example, has been identified as a potential location for Chinese military logistics facilities, indicating a deepening military relationship that could eventually include aircraft such as the J-10 .

Title:

Content: Home World Beijing looks at the Japanese and Indian military drills, the competition between the US and Russia’s original strong fighters | F-15 | India | Fighter

Beijing looks at the Japanese and Indian military drills, the competition between the US and Russia’s original strong fighters | F-15 | India | Fighter

by admin

[NTD Times, Beijing time, January 18, 2023]Amid China’s growing threat to the Indo-Pacific region, Japan and India launched their first joint fighter jet military exercise on Monday (January 16) in an 11-day During the military exercise, the American-made F-15 fighter jets and the Russian-made Su-30MKI fighter jets flew together.

Dubbed “Veer Guardian 2023,” the exercises will be held at Hyakuri Air Base in Ibaraki Prefecture and Iruma Air Base in Saitama Prefecture, Japan.

Four F-2 and four F-15 fighter jets of the Japan Air Self-Defense Force, four Su-30MKI fighter jets, two C-17 transport planes and an Il-78 aerial refueling aircraft were sent by the Indian Air Force, according to the Japanese Ministry of Defense. aircraft, and a contingent of about 150 soldiers.

The exercise was postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020, following an agreement between the foreign and defense ministers of the two countries at the first “2+2” security conference in New Delhi in November 2019.

Japan and India are part of what is known as a quartet of security frameworks that also includes the United States and Australia. The bloc is seen as a counterweight to China as Beijing seeks to increase its military and economic influence in the Indo-Pacific region.

As regional military threats mount, Tokyo is modernizing its military and expanding military cooperation with Indo-Pacific and Western partners to counter China. Relations between India and China also remain tense, with another melee between border soldiers between the two countries breaking out last month.

Both the F-15 fighter and the Su-30MKI fighter are air superiority fighters and are considered the “best air fighter” in the world. This joint military exercise may be very beneficial to the Japan Air Self-Defense Force for training on Su-30MKI fighter jets.

See also  Paris, ex Br Maurizio Di Marzio released

As tensions continue to escalate, military experts have analyzed that China‘s invasion of Taiwan could drag Japan into the war due to its geographical proximity. Moreover, Japan, America’s most prominent ally in the region, may have to get involved in the conflict as the United States has vowed to help Taiwan protect its sovereignty.

And the CCP frequently harasses the international airspace near Taiwan and Japan is the J-16 fighter jet, which is a variant of the Su-30MKI. In addition, the Chinese Air Force also has a Su-30MKI fighter fleet.

The Japan Air Self-Defense Force may improve its tactical capabilities against Chinese aircraft and enhance Japanese fighter pilots’ knowledge of the basic capabilities of the Su-30MKI fighter, including maneuverability, cruising range, fuel consumption, and turnaround time for maintenance. The data is crucial for Japanese military strategists and fighter pilots to prepare for a potential conflict between Russia and China.

The F-15 Eagle has an advantage over the Su-30MKI in terms of top speed. The top speed of the Su-30MKI can reach Mach 2, while the top speed of the F-15 is slightly above Mach 2.5. In addition, the F-15 Eagle fighter has a maximum range of 3,900 kilometers, while the Su-30 has a range of 3,000 kilometers.

Both fighters can carry a variety of armaments. In addition, the Indian version of the Su-30 has advanced Israeli and French avionics and electronic warfare systems, giving it an advantage over the standard Su-30 fighter, which will help Japanese fighter pilots prepare for air combat scenarios within visual range .

See also  "He raped a man": in Morocco the journalist critical of the monarchy Soulaiman Raissouni sentenced to five years

While the Chinese Communist Party has apparently dismissed the Japan-India joint military drills, experts say Beijing will be watching closely for the “battle” between the best U.S. and Russian fighter jets.

(Comprehensive report by reporter Li Zhaoxi/Editor in charge: Lin Qing)

URL of this article: https://www.ntdtv.com/gb/2023/01/18/a103627759.html

You may also like

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy

The global arms market’s increased demand, especially in the Middle East, and the desire of regional countries to modernize their air forces may create future opportunities for J-10 sales, but as of now, no formal agreements have been reported .

Title:

Content: Truth, Inspiration, Hope.

US Navy Buzzes Taiwan Strait With Surveillance Aircraft

Neil lives in Canada and writes about society and politics.
Published: July 16, 2023

The U.S. Navy buzzed the Taiwan Strait with a spy plane on July 13 “amid increased Chinese People’s Liberation Army activities in the area,” South China Morning Post reported.

In coverage of the event, Reuters referred to the aircraft, a P-8A Poseidon, as a “patrol plane” and noted its appearance converged with the third day of PLA exercises South of Taiwan.

Military publication Stars and Stripes described the P-8A as “a multirole, twin-engine aircraft based on Boeing’s 737 Next Generation airliner,” adding, “Its missions include intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, patrol, search and rescue and anti-submarine warfare.”

MORE ON CHINA GEOPOLITICS

Stars and Stripes added that the Taiwanese government stated the PLA’s exercises in the region involved “J-10 and J-16 fighter jets, H-6 bombers, Y-8 EW transport jets, unmanned aerial vehicles and carrier-based aircraft.”

The event led to some posturing between the PLA and the Navy.

The Navy’s 7th Fleet defended the maneuver in a statement, “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.”

While the PLA’s Eastern Theatre Command posted on its WeChat account, “Troops in the theatre are always on high alert and will resolutely defend national sovereignty and security as well as regional peace and stability,” Reuters noted.

The Poseidon’s appearance sparked a reaction from the Chinese Communist Party’s military apparatus. Taiwan’s Ministry of Defence told Reuters it had detected the PLA had scrambled 26 planes “including advanced Chinese J-16 and Su-30 fighters” to respond to the craft.

CCP messaging outlet Global Times defined the PLA’s activities as “aimed at safeguarding China’s national sovereignty and unity” in an article that lauded the country’s response to the Poseidon.

Tensions arose just days after NATO criticized “The People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) stated ambitions and coercive policies” in Africa and the Middle East in the sixth paragraph of a joint statement released in the midst of the Vilnius Summit on July 11.

NATO, which did not name the CCP in its messaging, said that China’s work in the area poses a “challenge [to] our interests, security and values.”

“The PRC employs a broad range of political, economic, and military tools to increase its global footprint and project power, while remaining opaque about its strategy, intentions and military build-up,” the release also stated.

The sore spot between the alliance and China may be Beijing’s persistent active and passive support for the Russian Federation in the Ukraine War.

“The deepening strategic partnership between the PRC and Russia and their mutually reinforcing attempts to undercut the rules-based international order run counter to our values and interests,” the document read.

During a press conference, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg reiterated the point when he said, “China is increasingly challenging the rules-based international order, refusing to condemn Russia’s war against Ukraine, threatening Taiwan and carrying out substantial military build-up,” SCMP reported in a second article.

Al Jazeera reported that China’s Mission to the European Union responded in a statement, “We firmly oppose and reject this.”

The Mission added that Beijing opposes NATO’s “eastward movement into the Asia-Pacific region,” a similar complaint to that of the Kremlin in the years leading up to the invasion of Ukraine.

In response, Global Times called NATO “Washington’s axe, spears and shovels” and a “source of war” wherever it goes.

Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Daniel Kritenbrink, told reporters at the beginning of July that Secretary Blinken would meet with partners at the ASEAN summit to address China’s “increasingly unhelpful, coercive, and irresponsible actions,” The Independent reported.

Kritenbrink added, “It is not a matter of getting countries on board with the US view, it’s a matter of working with our partners to advance our shared view and vision for the region and to push back on behaviour that runs counter to that vision.”

Just one day prior to the Taiwan Strait incident, Associated Press reported that Kim Yo Jong, sister of North Korea’s leader Kim Jong Un, had alleged “that the country’s warplanes repelled a U.S. spy plane flying over nearby waters Monday and warned of ‘shocking’ consequences if the U.S. continues reconnaissance in the area.”

What are the consequences of the problems that China's J-10 Fighters have?

What are the consequences of the problems that China's J-10 Fighters have?

**Feedback from Buyers and Military Analysts** Feedback from the PAF and Chinese military analysts regarding the J-10C has been largely positive.

**Feedback from Buyers and Military Analysts** Feedback from the PAF and Chinese military analysts regarding the J-10C has been largely positive.

**Feedback from Buyers and Military Analysts** Feedback from the PAF and Chinese military analysts regarding the J-10C has been largely positive.

Pakistani military officials and analysts highlight the aircraft’s agility, advanced avionics, and the integration of modern radar systems, such as the active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, as key advantages .

How is J-10C Fighter compared with JF-17, another jet fighter that China exports?

J-10 can be outfitted with a bigger active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar.

How is J-10C Fighter compared with JF-17, another jet fighter that China exports?

J-10 can be outfitted with a bigger active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar.

The J-10C is classified as a 4.5-generation fighter, which significantly improves the PAF’s combat effectiveness and operational capabilities compared to older models like the JF-17 .

The aircraft’s ability to carry advanced air-to-air missiles, including the PL-10 and PL-15, is seen as a substantial upgrade, enhancing Pakistan’s aerial combat capabilities and regional defense posture .

What may some improvements made in China's J-10 Fighter help Pakistan Airforce?

Enable Pakistan Air Force to carry more missiles to perform combat missions

What may some improvements made in China's J-10 Fighter help Pakistan Airforce?

Enable Pakistan Air Force to carry more missiles to perform combat missions

What may some improvements made in China's J-10 Fighter help Pakistan Airforce?

Enable Pakistan Air Force to carry more missiles to perform combat missions

Chinese analysts have praised the defense cooperation between China and Pakistan, emphasizing that the J-10C’s induction is a strategic move that strengthens Pakistan’s military capabilities while promoting Chinese aviation technology .

Which countries' airforces are the purchasers of China's J-10 FIghter?

The J-10C is described as a more powerful option compared to the JF-17, and its larger size allows for more advanced radar systems and weaponry .

How is J-10C Fighter compared with JF-17, another jet fighter that China exports?

J-10 can be outfitted with a bigger active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar.

An advanced export model of J-10 Fighter

What may some improvements made in China's J-10 Fighter help Pakistan Airforce?

Enable Pakistan Air Force to carry more missiles to perform combat missions

The PAF views the J-10C as a crucial addition, especially as its fleet of F-16s becomes increasingly outdated, and considers the J-10C’s advanced avionics and weaponry vital for countering regional threats, particularly from India .

Which countries' airforces are the purchasers of China's J-10 FIghter?

While direct, detailed user reviews from other buyers are limited due to the lack of additional export customers, the operational deployment of J-10s by China in military exercises and patrols suggests a high level of confidence in the platform’s capabilities .

Title:

Content: Adsence Ads 300X250
Adsense Ads 900×250

PAF formally inducts Rafale rival China-made J-10C fighter jets

Web Desk BOL News

11th Mar, 2022. 02:25 pm
Adsense Ads 300 x 100
Adsence Ads 300X250

KAMRA: The Pakistan Air Force (PAF) formally inducted a modern Chinese-made J-10C multi-role combat aircraft also known as “vigorous dragon” during a ceremony held at Kamra Airbase on Friday.

Prime Minister Imran Khan attended the induction ceremony of the single-engine fighter jet at the invitation of Chief of the Air Staff (CAS) Air Chief Marshal Zaheer Ahmad Babar, along with other federal ministers and the Chinese ambassador.

During the ceremony, The Prime Minister has witnessed a thrilling flypast of various aircraft formations, including the newly inducted J10C, F-16s, JF-17s, and Mirages, which displayed a sophisticated array of avionics and weaponry.

Read more: PAF’s acquisition of J10-C

Following the flypast, the Prime Minister witnessed the landing of five J-10C aircraft, which have been inducted into the 15 Squadron.

The J-10C is larger and can be outfitted with a bigger active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar than the JF-17 Block 3 uses.

The aircraft can carry fourth-generation air-to-air missiles such as the short-range PL-10 and the beyond-visual-range PL-15.

According to a foreign media report, China will deliver a total of 25 J-10C fighter jets to Pakistan, significantly increasing the country’s military capability to defend airspace.

Read more: J-10C induction ceremony: Pakistan knows how to protect its boundaries, says Imran

After being tested in Chengdu, the first batch of combat aircraft arrived in Pakistan a few days ago.

Images of a Pakistan Air Force (PAF) J-10C fighter jet with the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) markings recently surfaced on social media and were widely circulated by media outlets.

Chinese analysts have praised the latest defence cooperation between China and Pakistan, saying that the move is significant for both countries because it strengthens the Pakistani military’s combat capabilities, promotes China’s aviation equipment, and serves regional security interests.

“The J-10C will significantly improve the Pakistan Air Force’s combat capabilities,” Chinese analysts predicted.

“The J-10C is a 4.5-generation medium-sized fighter jet that is more powerful than the China-Pakistan jointly developed lightweight fighter jet, the JF-17, which is currently in service with the Pakistan Air Force,” Shi Hong, Executive Chief Editor of Shipborne Weapons, told the Global Times.

Download BOL News App for latest news

What are the consequences of the problems that China's J-10 Fighters have?

However, some concerns have been raised by defense enthusiasts and analysts regarding the J-10’s performance relative to Western and Russian fighters.

However, some concerns have been raised by defense enthusiasts and analysts regarding the J-10’s performance relative to Western and Russian fighters.

However, some concerns have been raised by defense enthusiasts and analysts regarding the J-10’s performance relative to Western and Russian fighters.

These concerns often focus on Chinese manufacturing quality, technological maturity, and the long-term reliability of the aircraft, leading to mixed opinions about its overall effectiveness .

Title:

Content: Taiwan reports second large-scale China air force incursion this week

TAIPEI (Reuters) - Ten Chinese air force aircraft entered Taiwan's air defence zone on Wednesday accompanying five Chinese warships engaged in "combat readiness" patrols, the island's defence ministry said, the second such incursion this week.

Taiwan, which China claims as its territory, has repeatedly complained of Chinese military activity near it over the past three years, as Beijing steps up pressure to try to force the island to accept its sovereignty.

Taiwan's defence ministry said that starting at around 9 a.m. (0100 GMT), it detected a total of 25 Chinese aircraft engaging in operations out at sea, including J-10 and J-16 fighters, as well as H-6 bombers.

Of those aircraft, the ministry said 10 had either crossed the median line of the Taiwan Strait, which previously served as an unofficial barrier between the two sides, or entered the southwestern part of Taiwan's air defence identification zone, or ADIZ.

Those aircraft were acting in coordination with five Chinese warships engaging in "combat readiness" patrols, it said.

Taiwan's military dispatched ships and aircraft to keep watch, the ministry said.

The ADIZ is a broad area Taiwan monitors and patrols to give its forces more time to respond to threats, and Chinese aircraft have not entered territorial Taiwanese air space.

On Sunday, Taiwan reported a similar level of activity by Chinese warplanes and warships near the island.

China staged war games around Taiwan in April after President Tsai Ing-wen returned home from a visit to the United States where she met U.S. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

Last August, it also held war games around Taiwan to protest against a trip to Taipei by then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Taiwan Vice President William Lai leaves for the United States this week on his way to Paraguay on what is officially only a transit but which has angered China.

It was China's "priority" to stop Lai from visiting the United States, Beijing's ambassador to the U.S. said last month.

Taiwan's democratically elected government rejects China's sovereignty claim and says only the island's people can decide their future.

(Reporting by Ben Blanchard)

Title:

Content: China continues military assistance to Russia despite sanctions - media

08:20 05 February Kyiv, Ukraine

China's state-owned defense companies supply navigation equipment, jamming technology, fighter jet parts and other dual-use goods to Russian sub-sanctioned companies. This was reported on Saturday, February 4, by The Wall Street Journal, citing an analysis of Russian customs data.

"Customs records show that Chinese state-owned defense companies are supplying navigation equipment, jamming technology and fighter jet parts to sanctioned Russian state-owned defense companies.. These are just some of the tens of thousands of shipments of dual-use items – products that have both commercial and military uses – that Russia has imported since its invasion last year.

It is noted that the majority of dual-use supplies to Russia came from China.. Although Russia also imported such goods through Turkey and the UAE. The WSJ has identified more than a dozen Russian and Chinese companies under US sanctions.

"Despite international controls and sanctions protocols, hard data on global trade shows that Chinese state-owned defense companies continue to send military parts to Russian defense companies under sanctions," Naomi Garcia, an analyst at C4ADS, a Washington-based national security threat organization, said in a statement.

According to her, these Russian companies "were seen using these same types of parts directly in Russia's war in Ukraine."

The WSJ material, in particular, reports that on August 31, 2022, the Chinese state defense company Poly Technologies shipped navigation equipment for the M-17 military transport helicopters to the Russian state military export company JSC Rosoboronexport.

Earlier in the month, Chinese electronics company Fujian Nanan Baofeng Electronic Co.. delivered to Rosoboronexport - through the Uzbek state defense company - a telescopic antenna for a military vehicle RB-531BE, which is used to jam communications. And on October 24, the Chinese state-owned aircraft manufacturer AVIC International Holding Corp. shipped AO Kret to a sanctioned subsidiary of the state defense giant Rostec, spare parts for Su-35 fighter jets worth $1.2 million.

Other foreign government suppliers found in Russian customs records include China Taly Aviation Technologies Corp., the procurement arm of the Chinese Air Force Equipment Department.. Among the firm's deliveries were parts shipped October 4 to the sanctioned Russian state-owned missile manufacturer Almaz-Antey for use in the 96L6E mobile radar system.

"The data also shows deliveries of Chinese DJI quadcopters to Russia after the imposition of sanctions and export controls.. Military analysts say the drones are being used by Russian forces to identify and monitor Ukrainian forces and then target them with artillery.

According to customs documents, some of these drones are shipped directly from the Chinese seller to Russian distributors, but other DJI quadcopters are in transit through the United Arab Emirates.

It is noted that China's support for Russia, which is waging war against Ukraine, was to be the subject of discussion during the visit of US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken to Beijing this weekend.. However, the trip was postponed indefinitely on Friday after the Pentagon said it tracked a Chinese reconnaissance balloon over the US mainland.

What problems have J-10 Fighters that China exports had?

What problems have J-10 Fighters that China exports had?

What problems have J-10 Fighters that China exports had?

**Media Commentary on Quality and Performance** Media and defense analysts have extensively commented on the J-10’s quality and performance.

**Media Commentary on Quality and Performance** Media and defense analysts have extensively commented on the J-10’s quality and performance.

**Media Commentary on Quality and Performance** Media and defense analysts have extensively commented on the J-10’s quality and performance.

The J-10C is widely described as a competitive 4.5-generation multi-role fighter jet, representing a significant technological advancement over older models like the JF-17 .

What has Taiwanese meida said about China's J-10 Fighter?

Substantial improvements have been made on it.

An advanced export model of J-10 Fighter

Its advanced avionics, larger airframe, and AESA radar are frequently highlighted as features that enhance its detection, targeting, and combat effectiveness .

How is J-10C Fighter compared with JF-17, another jet fighter that China exports?

J-10 can be outfitted with a bigger active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar.

What has Taiwanese meida said about China's J-10 Fighter?

Substantial improvements have been made on it.

The aircraft’s performance in air shows and military exercises, including joint drills with Russia and other partners, has been cited as evidence of its reliability and operational capability .

Title:

Content: What's new

Black Smoke Arises From China’s J-20 Stealth Fighter; Is Mighty Dragon Already Breaking Down?

Get Ya Wig Split

FULL MEMBER
Feb 22, 2017
1,649
-3
1,980
Country
Location

Black Smoke Arises From China’s J-20 Stealth Fighter; Is Mighty Dragon Already Breaking Down?https://eurasiantimes.com/category/expert-reviews/

Videos and photos of a Chinese J-20 stealth fighter jet releasing black smoke circulated the internet and caused debate among defense enthusiasts and military observers.

Some watchers claimed that the jet is overhyped and issues with poor Chinese manufacturing have begun to show.

The Generation 5 stealth fighter has been displayed to the public for the first time in this year’s ongoing Zhuhai Air Show, where the fighter landed, taxied, and parked before the public for a closer view.

Usually, the fighter only conducted flypasts and aerobatics. Now opening the ‘Mighty dragon’ for the audience indicates China’s and the People’s Liberation Army Air Force’s (PLAAF) confidence in the aircraft.

The rare public display also led to some close-up photographs being clicked, showing its brake parachute, part of the cockpit, and the enclosed air-to-air refueling probe.

The fine workmanship and finishing of the plane’s body were also visible, baring the highly sophisticated metallurgical, forging, and precision cutting processes.

J-20 Breaking Down?

The video showed a puff of black smoke being released from a small exhaust in the bottom spine of the plane, just before the tails (vertical stabilizer) section.

Onlookers claimed it was an issue with the plane’s engines, which China has still not succeeded in fully mastering. However, putting doubts ti rest, experts said it was the Auxiliary Power Unit (APU), which also operates the same way on the American F-22 Raptor.

The APU is usually a miniature jet whose primary role is to drive the main engine to complete the start-up operation.

It also provides part of the power and high-pressure air or fluid when the main engine is turned off to save fuel and reduce its wear and tear. This cumulatively has a significant positive impact on the main engine’s life and maintainability.

“That’s a most common feature when the APU starts,” noted Chinese military aviation expert Andreas Rupprecht while speaking to EurAsian Times. Former IAF Jaguar pilot Squadron Leader Vijainder K. Thakur confirmed it was the APU.

The following video shows the F-22’s APU throwing out thick, dark greyish, and black smoke. The F-22’s APU is located just under the leading edge of the left wing, above the side internal weapons bay compartment.

nother comment from a Chinese national on a popular defense page, who was present at the air show, said that the same J-20 was merely stopping over at Zhuhai and was seen perfectly taking off later. There were no issues with the engine.

J-20 To Be Upgraded Further

While the era for the J-20 is just beginning, unlike the F-22 and the F-35, which are beset with a host of production, technical and budget constraints.

Global Times quoted the J-20’s chief designer Yang Wei, who said that future upgrades would involve Artificial Intelligence (AI) and “cognitive technologies” to make it perform optimally in a “combat system.”

Current air warfare philosophy considers systems as teams and combinations of aircraft and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), which would coordinate to carry out joint tasks.

Speaking at a press conference by the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC), Wei said, “Four J-20s can form a formation, which is a small system; a J-20 can team up with a J-16 and a J-10C in another small system. Recent news reports also suggested that the J-20 can fly together with drones, which is also a system.”

The report quoted Yang saying that the development strategy of the PLAAF used to be homeland defense, but now it has become air-space integration with both attack and defense capabilities.

Junk-20 @F-22Raptor @Hamartia Antidote

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Top Bottom

Title:

Content: What's new

SU 35 for pakistan Airforce Is there is any chance

Super Falcon

ELITE MEMBER
Jul 3, 2008
14,549
-4
5,615
Country
Location

There was interest shown by PAF in SU 35 in 2015 but now again news is surfacing even my friend in russia who has links says pakistan military is in discussions to get SU 35 and oantsir Air defence System

Pakistan wanted a bigger bird to carry heavy hyoersonic version of aircraft launched missile

Hakikat ve Hikmet

ELITE MEMBER
Nov 14, 2015
13,773
17
36,036
Country
Location
Russia's selling Su-35s is a damn big geo-strategic statement by all parties involved! And, if true, it's a slap - right or left hand doesn't matter - on India's face....

Ali_Baba

SENIOR MEMBER
May 27, 2018
3,231
-1
4,661
Country
Location
No chance of Su35 in PAF service ever .... this keeps popping and gets debunked as it is quite an illogical purchase.

J10C will be the last non stealth new type that will be inducted into PAF - After that it will be TFX or a J-35 derivative that will have on it painted "Azm .. ".

Super Falcon

ELITE MEMBER
Jul 3, 2008
14,549
-4
5,615
Country
Location
Russia's selling Su-35s is a damn big geo-strategic statement by all parties involved! And, if true, it's a slap - right or left hand doesn't matter - on India's face....
Agreed but pakistan has to take steps quickly we cant rely on china russia offers cutting edge there are two options which can counte 3rd Rafale these are SU 35 and J 20

J 20 has few more years so SU 35 make a better choice

Since F 16 become obsekete we need tgese jets

No chance of Su35 in PAF service ever .... this keeps popping and gets debunked as it is quite an illogical purchase.

J10C will be the last non stealth new type that will be inducted into PAF - After that it will be TFX or a J-35 derivative that will have on it painted "Azm .. ".
These jet has more 10 years to mature we cabt count on just J 10

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 1, Guests: 1)

Top Bottom

The J-10’s operational use extends beyond export sales.

The J-10’s operational use extends beyond export sales.

The J-10’s operational use extends beyond export sales.

It has been actively involved in Chinese military exercises, particularly around Taiwan, where it participates in regular patrols and maneuvers.

It has been actively involved in Chinese military exercises, particularly around Taiwan, where it participates in regular patrols and maneuvers.

It has been actively involved in Chinese military exercises, particularly around Taiwan, where it participates in regular patrols and maneuvers.

For example, in March 2023, 19 J-10 fighters were reported in Taiwan’s air defense zone, demonstrating the aircraft’s readiness and strategic importance in regional security .

Title:

Content: Health

China resumes military operations around Taiwan | News

The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of China confirmed that it will carry out new military exercises in the air and sea space surrounding Taiwan in response to the visit of five US congressmen to the island.

READ ALSO:

China is experiencing its most intense and longest heat wave in 60 years

In this regard, Colonel Shi Yi, spokesman for the Eastern Theater of Operations Command, stated that the PLA will take the necessary measures to “resolutely defend national sovereignty.”

Meanwhile, a statement issued by the PLA maintains that “on August 15, the Eastern Theater organized a joint combat readiness patrol and an actual combat exercise in the sea and air space around the island of Taiwan.”

To which the document adds that the maneuvers constitute “a serious dissuasive element so that the United States (USA) and Taiwan do not continue playing with political tricks and undermining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.”

On this occasion, a total of 22 J-16, J-10, SU-30 and J-11 fighter planes, and one KJ-500 radar plane, and six Chinese military ships, developed in the southwestern part, participated in the military exercises. of Taiwan’s self-defined Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ).

China has carried out exercises of this nature in different coastal areas in recent weeks, amid the growing tensions unleashed in the Taiwan Strait after the visit to that territory by the Speaker of the US House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi. last August 2 and 3.

Meanwhile, this Sunday, a delegation from the US Congress led by Democratic Senator from Massachusetts, Ed Markey, landed in Taipei to meet with senior Taiwanese leaders such as President Tsai Ing-wen; as well as attending a banquet at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The de facto US embassy in Taipei avoided that the main reasons for the visit of the group of legislators are to discuss relations between the US and Taiwan, regional security, trade and investment, supply chains global issues, climate change and “other important issues of mutual concern”.

To which the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said that “the United States interferes with China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity; while stressing that” these trips ignore the protests and firm opposition by China to this interventionist and provocative policy”.

Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button

Title:

Content: WASHINGTON — Just days after the assault by Hamas ignited a new war in the Middle East, shipments of U.S. weapons began arriving in Israel: smart bombs, ammunition and interceptors for the Iron Dome missile-defense system. In President Joe Biden’s planned meeting in Israel on Wednesday with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, more military aid is a likely topic.

The conflict between Israel and Hamas is just the latest impetus behind a boom in international arms sales that is bolstering profits and weapons-making capacity among U.S. suppliers.

The surge in sales is providing the Biden administration with new opportunities to tie the militaries of other countries more closely to the United States, the world’s biggest arms exporter, while also raising concerns that a more heavily armed world will be prone to careen into further wars.

Even before Israel responded to the deadly Hamas attack, the combination of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the perception of a rising threat from China was spurring a global rush to purchase fighter planes, missiles, tanks, artillery, munitions and other lethal equipment. The surge in sales is also being driven by the rapid pace of technological change in warfighting, pressuring even well-armed nations to buy new generations of equipment to stay competitive.

The push to supply more weapons to Israel comes as U.S. military contractors are already struggling to keep up with demand to resupply Ukraine in its war against Russia and help other U.S. allies in Europe like Poland bolster their own defenses.

Billions of dollars in orders are pending from allies in Asia, driven by the perception of a rising threat from China.

Advertising

Worldwide military spending last year — on weapons, personnel and other costs — hit $2.2 trillion, the highest level in inflation-adjusted dollars since at least the end of the Cold War, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, which prepares an annual tally.

One of the biggest drivers is the increased purchase of new weapons systems.

Excluding sales within the United States, China and Russia, worldwide spending on military procurement is expected to hit $241 billion next year, a 23% increase since last year, even after adjusting for inflation.

That is by far the largest two-year increase in the database maintained by Janes, a company that has been tracking military spending for nearly two decades.

As of last year, the United States controlled an estimated 45% of the world’s weapons exports, nearly five times more than any other nation and its highest level since the years immediately following the collapse of the Soviet Union, according to the data. That is up from 30% a decade ago.

The intense demand for more military firepower has also encouraged other arms-producing nations, like Turkey and South Korea, to increase their exports, giving purchasers more options at a time when production shortfalls in the United States mean it can take years for orders to be filled.

Advertising

Some of the big purchasers, like Poland, a NATO ally that fears further Russian aggression, are arming themselves more heavily to confront specific threats. Others, like Indonesia, once a customer of Russia that is now moving to buy more from the West, are trying not to fall behind in regions undergoing rapid militarization. And nations in the Middle East, from Israel to Saudi Arabia, continue to be major buyers of U.S. weapons, orders that will only now jump again with the new war.

The surge in weapons purchases has caused growing concern about the potential for conflicts to become more likely, and more deadly, beyond the wars that already are underway in Europe and the Middle East.

“We live in a very fragile world, where there are many unresolved conflicts,” said Michael Klare, a board member at the nonprofit Arms Control Association. He pointed to tensions between Pakistan and India, or between Azerbaijan and Armenia, all of which have increased recent military equipment buys.

“There is a risk these arms sales will exacerbate a regional conflict,” he said, “and trigger the outbreak of war among the great powers, ultimately.”

For the big military contractors, the surge has bolstered their bottom lines.

Pentagon notifications to Congress of proposed government-to-government foreign military sales surpassed $90.5 billion in the first nine months of this year, exceeding the pace of an annual average of about $65 billion over the prior decade, according to data tallied by the Forum on the Arms Trade.

Advertising

And government sales are just one portion of the global arms trade, with direct sales from military contractors comprising the bulk of the business. Last year, the $51.9 billion in foreign military sales that flowed through the Pentagon represented just one-third of the $153.7 billion in authorized direct sales of weapons, military parts and services by the United States to overseas buyers, including Ukraine.

“Lots of good news out there,” Gregory Hayes, the CEO of RTX, whose Raytheon division is one of the world’s largest suppliers of missile systems, said during a Wall Street briefing in April. “And for us, it’s just a question of getting it out the door, at this point.”

The push to modernize military arsenals has also created one of the most consequential diplomatic pushes since World War II by the U.S. government to expand military alliances.

The United States is beginning to make inroads with new customers like India and Indonesia, taking them away or weaning them from Russia or China, while selling more to existing allies and buyers. Purchases of U.S.-made weapons systems typically require close coordination with the U.S. military and long-term contracts for maintenance and upgrades that help to build ties.

“We have a moment of opportunity right now,” said Mira Resnick, a deputy assistant secretary at the State Department, which is the lead agency approving foreign military sales. “One of the ways that we can effect strategic failure for Russia is by cutting the Russian defense industry off of its security partners.”

Demand from Europe and Asia

Nowhere outside of Ukraine is the race to buy more apparent than in Poland, opening opportunities not just for the major U.S. contractors but also those of other nations.

Sponsored

President Andrzej Duda announced last month at a military industry-sponsored trade conference that his country is going to spend more than 4% of its gross domestic product on defense, or twice the goal agreed to by NATO nations.

Since January, Poland has been granted the right to buy $41.7 billion in weapons from the United States, including Lockheed Martin’s HIMARS and Hellfire missile systems ($10 billion), Raytheon’s Integrated Air and Missile Defense system ($15 billion) and 96 of Boeing’s Apache attack helicopters ($12 billion). These are in addition to the Abrams tanks built by General Dynamics and F-35 fighter jets from Lockheed Martin that Poland has ordered in recent years.

Poland’s minister of defense, Mariusz Błaszczak, climbed onto a stage one recent Sunday in front of a crowd at a military training ground outside Warsaw to get a firsthand look at a new generation of tanks, helicopters, missiles and drones.

“Today, we can admire modern equipment, modern weapons of the Polish army, weapons that we obtained through the implementation of arms contracts,” Błaszczak said.

Poland has decided it urgently needs so many new weapons that U.S. contractors simply cannot deliver the items fast enough, officials in Poland said.

As a result, it has also turned to nations like South Korea and Turkey that have worked to expand their own weapons sales.

Advertising

Last year, Poland reached a $14 billion agreement with South Korea as it plans to buy as many as 1,000 tanks, 48 fighter jets and 672 self-propelled howitzers. That order by Poland alone is larger than all of the tanks now in the militaries of Germany, Britain and France combined.

When Lockheed, working through a huge backlog of orders, could not deliver missiles on a timetable sought last year by Poland, Błaszczak said he turned to South Korea for missile launchers that are similar to Lockheed’s HIMARS system.

The first of the South Korea-made missile launchers arrived in Poland in August, less than a year after the deal was signed. Lockheed took four years to deliver the first of its HIMARS missile launchers to Poland, which signed a deal for them in 2019. Lockheed declined requests to comment.

“Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is reshaping spending priorities, driving nations to better prepare for existing and future threats,” said Vince Logsdon, a retired Air Force colonel now at Boeing, which recently pitched Poland to buy a new fleet of its F-15EX fighter jets.

Poland has also added Turkey to its list of weapons suppliers, buying armed drones made by Baykar, a former automotive parts company turned military contractor, which delivered the first of them last year.

Turkish drone makers in recent years have sold their devices to at least 29 nations; the drones have been used in war zones in Libya, Syria, Ethiopia, Somalia and Azerbaijan, according to Soner Cagaptay, a researcher at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

Advertising

“Turkey is mapping its power globally through the sale of weapons,” Cagaptay said, noting that it is now the world’s 11th-largest arms dealer, up from 18th a decade ago.

The Biden administration’s push to capitalize diplomatically on the demand for U.S.-built weapons has been particularly notable in Asia, where Washington has been working to bolster alliances as a counterweight to China’s expanding power.

Indonesia is now considered a big prize, which explains in part why Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin III visited there last year to push the nation to buy Boeing-built F-15 fighter jets.

Indonesia had signed a contract in 2018 to buy Russian Sukhoi Su-35S fighter jets. It later backed out of that deal and looked instead to the West: It recently moved to buy fighters from France and now has a tentative deal to buy F-15s, which are made in St. Louis. Indonesia also announced plans to buy Blackhawk helicopters from Lockheed Martin.

Military equipment deals by the United States during the Biden administration have also been discussed or signed with Vietnam, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Australia and Japan, and even with some small Pacific island nations. Taiwan alone has a backlog of U.S. weapons orders worth as much as $19 billion.

The weapons sales in the Middle East are only adding to the demand.

Advertising

In the days after the attacks by Hamas in Israel, Biden announced that the United States was already moving to send additional ammunition and Iron Dome interceptor missiles made by Raytheon and Rafael, an Israeli military contractor.

New shipments of small, 250-pound guided bombs made by Boeing are also being sent to Israel, as are additional gear that converts older, crude bombs into precision-guided “smart” munitions.

The United States already provides Israel more than $3 billion in military assistance every year, but Congress could move soon to increase funding. Israel has asked the United States for $10 billion in emergency aid, according to three officials familiar with the request, though it is not clear how much would be for weapons and munitions.

“We’re going to make sure that Israel does not run out of these critical assets to defend its cities and its citizens,” Biden said.

Even more weapons could soon be headed to Saudi Arabia, which already is the single biggest buyer of U.S. weapons (its purchases through the Pentagon since 1950 total $164 billion). Over the past two years, it has requested permission to buy billions of dollars more, including a proposed order last month for parts needed to keep its U.S.-made tanks and weapons systems operating.

Jeff Abramson, an arms control advocate at the Center for International Policy, said the surge in sales would resonate long after the wars in Europe and the Middle East end.

Advertising

“The history of the arms trade is one filled with dangerous, unexpected results,” he said. “We tend to forget that weapons have a long life and often end up in the hands of those we did not intend or want to have them.”

The challenge of capacity

The boom in sales will help the Pentagon confront a weakness apparent after Russia invaded Ukraine in February last year: the capacity of the defense industrial base in the United States to produce weapons fast enough at a time of intensified superpower tensions.

The increase in demand is providing weapons makers confidence that they can count on sustained orders to increase production and assure that the U.S. industry remains robust. Contractors have taken some initial steps to add shifts and equipment.

International sales are now so strong that Raytheon, the military division of RTX Corp., expects that one-third of all of its weapons sales will be to international customers by 2025, up from about 25% last year.

The orders now being tallied by U.S. military contractors will generate work for years. Lockheed, the world’s largest military contractor, in the past two years has secured approval or sales agreements worth as much as $50 billion for its F-35 fighter jets with Switzerland, Finland, Germany, Greece, Czech, Canada and Korea.

These orders have a direct impact on factories in the United States, including Boeing’s F-15 fighter jet plant in St. Louis, which could soon be building planes for Indonesia and perhaps Poland.

The Pentagon and the State Department have been working this year to find ways to accelerate approval of foreign military sales to keep up with the rising global demand.

But the main bottleneck remains manufacturing capacity.

“We need an industrial base that meets these requirements,” said James Hursch, director of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, which oversees foreign military sales along with the State Department. “Everyone involved — allies, partners, industry — all know this is a major challenge.”

The J-10’s deployment in these contested regions signals China’s growing military capabilities and commitment to supporting allied nations .

Title:

Content: The US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken is a man in a hurry. The president expects him to produce foreign-policy success stories.

Success stories are desperately needed as post-Afghanistan, the superpower has become laughing stock universally. The trans-Atlantic alliance is seriously disoriented and Russia is on the prowl in the heart of Europe with natural gas to sell. The Iranians are yet to give a date for the resumption of talks on the US’ return to the JCPOA.

As for China, the less said the better. The chairman, joint chiefs of staff General Milley senses a “Sputink moment”. The Russian and Chinese warships exercise “freedom of navigation” on the forbidden seas of Japan’s eastern coastline littered with top-secret military installations.

The list goes on and on. The unkindest cut of all is that the traditional client regimes in West Asia are also asserting. They look to diversify their relations and project their power through broader alliances. And the more they look eastward, the deeper they engage with China.

Blinken must worry. The Chinese are Chinese, after all. After the US refusal to sell armed drones to Gulf states, China had a deal to set up a drone factory — the Gulf’s first — at Saudi Arabia’s King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology.

Things came to such a pass that the Biden Administration is agonising that the sale of F-35 stealth fighter jets to the UAE risks China gaining access to some of America’s latest military technology. The FT captioned an incisive analysis of the state of play as ‘More of China, less of America’.

The FT report cited a Pentagon paper on China’s military power, released last year, which  listed the UAE among countries Beijing “likely considered” as locations for “military logistics facilities”. Both Saudi Arabia and the UAE, the regional heavyweights, have taken formal steps to deepen their relations with China in recent years.

The Pentagon is also getting frantic. General Kenneth F McKenzie, the commander of the US central command, told a webinar earlier this year, “We need to recognise that competition against Russia and China simply doesn’t only occur in the western Pacific or in the Baltic, it occurs in places like the Middle East, where they are expanding and coming in.” read more

Blinken is trained as aide drafting memos for senators in the Congress. But all that has no relevance to the Middle East with a political culture steeped in intrigues, skulduggery and cynical realism. In Blinken’s place, Jared Kushner would have found a better way to communicate with the powerful Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

Blinken must be a secret admirer of Kushner to steal so sheepishly the jewel in the crown of the roving prince in the Trump White House — the Abraham Accords. Blinken simply picked up the threads where Kushner left them and strove to do one better on the Abraham Accords.

Possibly, the Israelis advised Blinken, given their own growing unease over Iran’s imminent surge with the lifting of sanctions and the US’ retrenchment upturning the regional balance.

Indeed, the strange thing about Abraham Accords is that it cannot be left unattended. A standstill would mean attrition and risks ignominy. Kushner’s original plan was that Saudi Arabia would come on board, which would have been a game changer. But, instead, a Saudi-Iranian normalisation got under way.

Credit must be given to Iranian ingenuity to figure out that Abraham Accords would eventually come to haunt the UAE. Iranian analysts saw advantages insofar as the torrid affair between the Emiratis and the Israelis that had been going on for years was at last in full public view, and the sheer incongruity of it would start worrying the Sheikhs until its legitimacy got established regionally.

Now, what better way to legitimise the Abraham Accords than by bringing India into it? The idea of a virtual meeting of the foreign ministers of the US, Israel, UAE and India on October 18 was intended as a masterstroke. The project was hailed as “Indo-Abraham Accords” by American lobbyists.

Conceivably, India’s External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar didn’t need any persuasion. He saw another golden opportunity to cement India’s quasi-alliance with the US and to create synergy with the US-Israeli game plan to counter China’s cascading influence in the Gulf. read more

However, the Indo-Abrahamic Accord exposes a bloc mentality, an archaic Cold War mindset. Blinken is used to that. But the regional states have left the Cold War behind.

Unsurprisingly, the week-old Indo-Abrahamic Accord was already upstaged by dramatic developments in Sudan last Monday. Sudan can no longer reconcile with the original Abrahamic Accords. read more

Contradictions are galore. The military leadership in Khartoum is close to Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Egypt. The coup leader Gen. Abdel-Fattah Burhan was trained in Egypt’s military college and has made multiple visits since 2019 to the Emirates’ de-facto ruler, Abu Dhabi crown prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan. read more

The generals also get along splendidly well with China and Russia. (The Russians even swung a submarine base on the Red Sea.) Israel is hoping against hope that the generals will not give up power. Actually, as the Middle East Eye estimated, “Israel is trapped in a catch-22. situation. A military government that wants to form ties with Israel cannot deliver. On the other hand, if Sudan has a civilian democratic and free government, the chances of having peace with Israel are very slim.” read more

Yet, the US cannot propagate democracy in Sudan, either. The catch is, Arab Spring may well produce the very same results in Sudan as it did once in Egypt  — political Islam. The Sudanese developments show the limits to the Quad-type of diplomacy that the US practises in the Middle East today — ‘You’re with us, or against us.’

Simply put, the Abraham Accords has no future. Why defame the common patriarch of the great Abrahamic religions by naming a Faustian deal after him? Kushner was probably lucky to have scooted from the scene at the right moment.

Blinken is wasting time by creating cabals in the Middle East. It is a hopelessly discredited strategy to somehow keep the US embedded in West Asia when its diplomacy is clearly losing traction. What happens if the clutch goes while driving?

Sudan has highlighted that there is a serious issue. What is unfolding in Khartoum is a classic symptom of a failing clutch that needs to be attended to. The military never took the 2019 deal on transition to democratic rule. Trump knew it but pretended not to notice, since the obsession was to hustle Sudan into the Abrahamic Accords. Didn’t UAE and Israel know it too? Of course, they knew. read more

But Blinken apparently was unaware that the Abrahamic Accords stood on weak foundations and imposing an Indian superstructure on it would be sheer madness. Sudan signals that driving with a failed clutch can be dangerous, as when a clutch goes bad, it can break apart, leaving you without a vehicle.

Ambassador M K Bhadrakumar served the Indian Foreign Service for more than 29 years. He introduces about himself thus:  “Roughly half of the 3 decades of my diplomatic career was devoted to assignments on the territories of the former Soviet Union and to Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan. Other overseas postings included South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey. I write mainly on Indian foreign policy and the affairs of the Middle East, Eurasia, Central Asia, South Asia and the Asia-Pacific…”

His mail ID : indianpunchline@gmail.com

Originally posted in, Indianpunchline

Countercurrents is answerable only to our readers. Support honest journalism because we have no PLANET B. Subscribe to our Telegram channel

GET COUNTERCURRENTS DAILY NEWSLETTER STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX

Tags: , ,

Media reports have also highlighted the strategic implications of Pakistan’s acquisition, noting that it not only strengthens Pakistan’s air force but also enhances China’s position in the global arms market .

Which countries' airforces are the purchasers of China's J-10 FIghter?

The cooperation between China and Pakistan in defense matters is viewed as a significant factor in regional security dynamics, with the J-10C’s induction seen as a move that shifts the balance of air power in South Asia .

Which countries' airforces are the purchasers of China's J-10 FIghter?

Which countries' airforces are the purchasers of China's J-10 FIghter?

Which countries' airforces are the purchasers of China's J-10 FIghter?

Commentators have compared the J-10C favorably against other regional fighter jets, such as the Rafale, highlighting its advanced technology, stealth features, maneuverability, and combat effectiveness .

What has Taiwanese meida said about China's J-10 Fighter?

Substantial improvements have been made on it.

An advanced export model of J-10 Fighter

What has Taiwanese meida said about China's J-10 Fighter?

Substantial improvements have been made on it.

An advanced export model of J-10 Fighter

What has Taiwanese meida said about China's J-10 Fighter?

Substantial improvements have been made on it.

An advanced export model of J-10 Fighter

However, some analysts and media sources have expressed concerns about the overall quality and reliability of Chinese military aircraft, including the J-10.

However, some analysts and media sources have expressed concerns about the overall quality and reliability of Chinese military aircraft, including the J-10.

However, some analysts and media sources have expressed concerns about the overall quality and reliability of Chinese military aircraft, including the J-10.

Issues such as engine performance, radar capabilities, and manufacturing standards are cited as potential limitations affecting operational performance .

Title:

Content: Weapons that Don’t Work in the Ukraine War Make Up Most of China’s Military

Chinese analysts want to understand why Russian weapons are doing so badly in the war in Ukraine. 70% of China’s modern airplanes are licensed copies, unlicensed copies or variants of the SU-27. 20% are inferior planes that are not even as good as the Russian copies.

The Ukraine War has been an actual real world test or most of the modern planes, missiles, drones that the world has. The only systems that have not been tested or used are the stealth fighters. Russia has some SU57 stealth fighters but has not used them other than a few safe uses from long-range.

The other lessons are which tactics are ineffective and which tactics are more effective. There is also the need for a lot more drones for front line troops. Drones have become an absolute necessity on the front lines. There is a need for a lot more ammunition and overall training. There will need to be a lot more training on the effective tactics.

China also wants to look at the Russian Kinzhal hypersonic missile getting shot down. The Kinzhal and China’s hypersonic weapons (YJ-21 and DF-17) are similar technology. They are hypersonic warheads on a regular rocket booster. The Kinzhal had about 6 shot down in one day. The Kinzhal cost Russia about $10 million each to make. The YJ-21 is a shorter range navy variant of the DF-17. The YJ-21 costs about $8 million each. The DF-17 costs about $107 million each. Russia had about 6 Kinzhal missiles shot down in 1 day in the war. Normal supersonic missiles are about $1-2 million. The point of spending more money for a faster missile is so it can with near certainty penetrate defenses. A military could always just buy 10 or 100 cheaper missiles to overwhelm air defenses. You don’t want to go too cheap where the missiles are not reliable like a Scud missile. You want to spend enough to get good cost benefit on reliable destruction.

The Russian S-400 air defense system was supposed to be a scary system able to defend against the US air force and missiles. The S-400s have been defeated and destroyed with a few waves of cheap drones and cheap missiles. China bought a lot of expensive S-400 air defense systems.

The US and the rest of world may not have the exact same Russian equipment but all of the world’s military have to update and change procurement to reflect what is being learned in Ukraine.

Russia has lost about 20% of its Su-34 fleet, with a starting total of only 121 aircraft. Four Su-34 planes were shot down in only 2 days in December, 2023.

Chinese analysis identifies two reasons for these heavy losses.

1. The Russian Aerospace Force, which inherited the air combat theories of the Soviet Air Force, habitually allows existing combat aircraft to take on the tasks of both air defense suppression and electronic warfare.

2. Russian military’s did not buy enough precision guided stand-off munitions. They cannot keep their planes safer by being further away.

Roughly 20% of the PLAAF and PLANAF’s combat aircraft are old second-generation fighters of limited combat value against peer opponents, save perhaps in swarming attacks. Another 30% include strategic bombers and more capable but dated third-generation designs. Finally, 50% percent are fourth-generation fighters that can theoretically hold their own against peers like the F-15 and F-16.

China has about 126 actual Russian planes in the Su-27 family (SU27, SU30, SU35).

The J-11 and J-16 are copies of the SU-27 Russian planes, that are getting shotdown by ground to air missiles in Ukraine. The J-11 was a licensed copy of the SU-27.

The J-10 is a copy of the Israeli Lavi from Israeli designs. The Lavi was based on the design of the French Dassault Mirage. The J-10s haver had several deadly accidents possibly related to difficulties in the fly-by-wire system. 22% of China’s 2500 combat aircraft are J-10.

The J-7 is an older and even more outdated plane makes up 20% of the fleet of 2500.

China’s J-20 now makes up about 8% of China’s 2500 combat jets. This is stealth plane copied from stolen F-22 and F-35 information.

What problems have J-10 Fighters that China exports had?

What problems have J-10 Fighters that China exports had?

What problems have J-10 Fighters that China exports had?

The reliance on Russian engines, in particular, has been highlighted as a possible constraint on the J-10’s operational effectiveness .

Additionally, incidents involving J-10 jets, such as a near-miss with an Australian Navy helicopter, have raised questions about the professionalism of PLA operations and the potential risks associated with the use of J-10 jets in sensitive areas .

Title:

Content: Home Business China wants a stronger military

China wants a stronger military

by admin

Addressing the National People’s Congress in Beijing, the Chinese president Xi Jinpingconfirmed for the third consecutive mandate, declared to the Armed Forces delegation that thePeople’s Liberation Army (Epl) must prepare to become the military tool of a world power. Not only that: the president and secretary of the Chinese Communist Party has predicted, for 2023, a increase in the planning of military spending “appropriate” to the instability of international security.

The Chinese Armed Forces are now in the wake of a decisive change which completes the long journey begun with the reforms of Deng Xiaoping.

Deng and Jiang’s Modernizations for a Professional Army

The EPL was radically revamped for the first time since Deng Xiaoping who introduced the concept of professional army and reduced the number of the force to increase training and professional preparation, as well as the diffusion of technology towards peripheral units, actually employed on the ground.

Then in 1993, with the management of Jiang Zeminthe Central Military Commission (CMC) introduced the Military Strategic Guidelines for the new period, a first real programmatic document of a further organizational and technological revolution of the military. With this document the importance was removed from the northern territorial forces (also due to the disappearance of the Soviet Union), a decisive projection on the sea and the implementation of a military instrument capable of fighting and winning a “local and limited war in high-tech conditions” was advocated.

This type of conflict, inspired by the CMC from the evolution of the Second Gulf War, would necessarily have been approached with the high-tech aero-naval tool and with the ability to carry out joint campaign (with the seamlessly integrated employment of the Army, Navy and Air Force). In addition to the case study of the Gulf War, this doctrine was particularly inspired by the conflicts in the South and East China seas.

See also  Resolution 29 of 06/02/2023 - Correction of the residual commitments and activation of the residual liabilities of the Autonomous State Authority for Public Works for the financial year 2023

With Jiang’s modernization, China began a reasoning introduction of naval means such as corvettes (for example those of model 053H3, Jiangwei II and model 053H1G, Jianghu V) and submarines (Ming class model 035G and 035B) which gave the Navy of the People’s Republic of China the ability to intervene quickly and discreetly in the China Sea . The impetus for the construction and integration of these units was undoubtedly strengthened by the Taiwan question which erupted in the strait crisis of 1995 and 1996.

The Chinese Armed Forces had therefore decisively taken the path of top-down modernization between the end of the 1990s and the 2000s.

The advent of Xi

With the aspiration to the role of world power and the “peaceful rise” of the Hu era, the military instrument found itself in the need to make the leap in quality to become internationally competitive. Xi Jinping’s coming to power in 2013 meant the introduction of a new military reform in 2015which has focused heavily on the centralization of the Armed Forces (and a consequent more pervasive control of the Party) and the modernization of the Command and Control (C2) to face the need to share information and influence capabilities so important in armed conflicts of last generation and in multi-domain operations.

The online entry of the JP-20 Chengdu, Chinese military aircraft that fits into the fifth generation of aerial combat. On the real potential in terms of multi-domain effects (which therefore also involve the cyber and space environment) the debate is heated and it seems that Chengdu is inferior to its Western and Russian counterparts, but it demonstrates Chinese attention to the new type of conflict . This attention is also demonstrated by the creation, again in 2015, of the Strategic Support Forcea fifth arm of the PLA (joining the Army, Air Force, Navy and Rocket Force) and specifically concerned with military action in fifth generation conflicts and with influencing space dominance, coordinating targeting capability (acquiring targets to hit), cyber and information.

See also  National Development and Reform Commission Price Monitoring Center: It is expected that this round of domestic refined oil price adjustments will be "stranded"_Guangming.com-politics.gmw.cn

The multi-domain breakthrough

In fact, China is among the first advanced countries, if not the first ever, to dedicate an armed force to the space and cyber domains, bearing in mind that the US Space Force was made independent in 2019. The weight of multi-domain operations is therefore considered decisive by the Chinese personnel and doctrine and the use in this sense is held in high consideration, it remains to be seen which both the real technological level reached by the Armed Forces of the PRC and the effective capability of C2 in this type of operations actually possessed by the PLA. This starting point is essential for understanding the substantiality of the further change of pace that Xi, who has just been reconfirmed President, and his entourage are asking for with the increase in military investment.

Western military technology and that of allied countries has so far proved to be more advanced than both Russian and Chinese according to important studies related to the sector, such as for example Multidomain Deterrence and Strategic Stability in China by analyst Lora Saalman (published by the Swedish institute SIPRI), although the Chinese one is getting closer. Furthermore, again according to the same study, published in 2022, the technological equality of the arsenals could, of course, facilitate a dialogue of stability with the United States and at least the member countries of the alliance Five Eyes between the US, UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand.

The gap to be filled, for Beijing, would also be of a quantitative nature, since the fifth generation technological assets in the possession of Western countries are more numerous. It is therefore likely that the military investment announced in China will concern the quality and quantity of multi-domain technologiesa development of the integrated training of the multi-domain C2 (which can take place, for example, within the exercises of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization) and a restructuring of the companies producing weapon systems (with respect to which Western companies, also due to the freedom of the market, have so far made the difference.

See also  Two-seater/Disney element is the highlight real shot Wuling NanoEV limited edition-Sina Motors

EPA/MARK R. CRISTINO

You may also like

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy

What problems have J-10 Fighters that China exports had?

Despite these concerns, the J-10 is generally viewed as a capable and modern multi-role fighter that enhances both China’s and Pakistan’s air combat capabilities.

Despite these concerns, the J-10 is generally viewed as a capable and modern multi-role fighter that enhances both China’s and Pakistan’s air combat capabilities.

Despite these concerns, the J-10 is generally viewed as a capable and modern multi-role fighter that enhances both China’s and Pakistan’s air combat capabilities.

Its presence at international arms fairs and its active deployment in military exercises contribute to its growing profile in the global fighter jet market .

Title:

Content: Taiwan reports 19 Chinese air force planes in its air defense zone

Taiwan’s defense ministry recently reported that it had spotted nineteen Chinese air force planes, 19 J-10 fighters, in its air defense zone, ADIZ, on the first of March 2023.

According to Reuters, Taiwan’s forces sent up its own air force planes as a response to “such Chinese incursion.”

However, the aircraft did not cross the sensitive median line of the Taiwan Strait, which previously served as an unofficial barrier between the two sides.

This kind of action from the Chinese military is what Taipei calls “regular harassment by Beijing” because China still views Taiwan as its own territory.

Even if the democratically elected Taiwanese government has repeatedly offered talks with China about the issue, Taiwan sticks to its own ground and says it will defend itself if attacked and that only the Taiwanese people can decide their own future.

Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/taiwan-reports-19-chinese-air-force-planes-its-air-defence-zone-2023-03-01/

About Kanlayakorn Pengrattana

Kanlayakorn 'Princess' Pengrattana is a freelance writer at ScandAsia.

View all posts by Kanlayakorn Pengrattana

Title:

Content: ‘Unsafe and unprofessional’: Australian Navy helicopter in near miss with Chinese fighter jet

We’re sorry, this feature is currently unavailable. We’re working to restore it. Please try again later.

Advertisement

‘Unsafe and unprofessional’: Australian Navy helicopter in near miss with Chinese fighter jet

By Andrew Probyn

A Chinese fighter jet dropped flares in front of an Australian Navy helicopter in international waters, in an incident Defence Minister Richard Marles has condemned as unprofessional and unacceptable.

The near-catastrophic incident occurred about 7.30pm (AEST) on Saturday during a routine operation in the Yellow Sea off South Korea.

A navy Seahawk operating off HMAS Hobart was intercepted by a Chinese J10 Air Force jet.

“The PLA Air Force plane dropped flares about 300 metres in front of the Seahawk helicopter about 60 metres above it, requiring the helicopter to take evasive action in order to not be hit by those flares,” Marles told Nine News.

Loading

Defence sources have told Nine News only the quick reflexes of the Australian pilot averted disaster – the Seahawk normally operates with a crew of four to six. No one aboard the helicopter was hurt.

Marles condemned the incident and said Beijing had been formally notified of Australia’s concerns.

HMAS Hobart was taking part in Operation Argos, a United Nations mission to prevent North Korea smuggling sanctioned goods across the sea.

“This was an incident which was both unsafe and unprofessional,” Marles told Nine News.

Advertisement

“Now Australians are engaging in important work enforcing UN Security Council sanctions and in doing that work, we’re operating on the high seas in accordance with international law in accordance with the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.

“And we expect that when we have interactions with other militaries, including with the Chinese military, that those interactions are professional and safe. This incident was completely unacceptable.

“We have expressed our concerns to the Chinese government formally in relation to this incident. HMAS Hobart continues in its work in enforcing those UN Security Council sanctions.

“When you look at the speed at which fighter planes move, at which helicopters move, the reaction time here is measured in a couple of seconds. And the consequences of the flare actually making contact with the helicopter could have been deeply significant, would have put lives in danger.

“Our concern is always for the welfare of the men and women who wear our nation’s uniform … serving as Defence Force personnel, and the interactions that were occurring by the PLA Air Force were unacceptable. We have expressed our concerns to the Chinese government formally in relation to this incident.”

Two navy divers were injured last November after they were subjected to sonar pulses from a Chinese warship during an operation in international waters on HMAS Toowoomba.

Loading

The sonar incident occurred just days after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese visited Beijing in an effort to stabilise the relationship with Australia’s biggest trading partner.

Albanese has resisted calls to reveal whether he raised the matter with Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the APEC summit, but condemned Beijing for the “dangerous”, “unsafe” and “unprofessional” conduct.

The incident will test Australia’s relationship with China just as the two nations mend trading links. Chinese Premier Li Qiang is expected to visit Australia in June.

However, the Albanese government directly identified China’s unprecedented military build-up as the biggest threat of conflict in the Indo-Pacific at the Defence strategy launch on April 17.

“The risk of a crisis or conflict in the Taiwan Strait is increasing, as well as at other flashpoints, including disputes in the South and East China Seas and on the border with India,” the strategy says.

It accuses China of employing “coercive tactics in pushing its strategic objectives, including forceful handling of territorial disputes and unsafe intercepts of vessels and aircraft operating in international waters and airspace in accordance with international law”.

Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter.

Most Viewed in Politics

Loading

The J-10’s role in China’s broader military modernization efforts and its strategic use in regional security dynamics ensure it remains a focal point in discussions on military procurement worldwide .

**Geopolitical and Strategic Implications** The sale of J-10C jets to Pakistan is part of China’s broader strategy to strengthen defense ties with key regional partners and enhance its influence in South Asia.

**Geopolitical and Strategic Implications** The sale of J-10C jets to Pakistan is part of China’s broader strategy to strengthen defense ties with key regional partners and enhance its influence in South Asia.

**Geopolitical and Strategic Implications** The sale of J-10C jets to Pakistan is part of China’s broader strategy to strengthen defense ties with key regional partners and enhance its influence in South Asia.

This move supports Pakistan’s military modernization while promoting Chinese aviation technology and arms exports in a region traditionally influenced by U.S.

This move supports Pakistan’s military modernization while promoting Chinese aviation technology and arms exports in a region traditionally influenced by U.S.

This move supports Pakistan’s military modernization while promoting Chinese aviation technology and arms exports in a region traditionally influenced by U.S.

and Russian equipment .

Title:

Content: What's new

J 10 CP is really a good Enough to Counter Rafale and S 400

Super Falcon

ELITE MEMBER
Jul 3, 2008
14,335
-4
5,503
Country
Location
Guys there are some facts we blindly ignore as patwaris

If j 10 brings same weapon package as thunder the major difference wont be much and russian engine do not produce enogh power to let AESA radar of J 10 work at its full potential

Only. Difference is
Better manuverability
Carry more missiles

For me its not enough

India have signed a deal to upgrade all rafales to F4 varient standard which has better protection with dummy target to save it self from imminent destruction

Rafale has better instantaneous turn rate than j 10
J 10 has some major flaws

Super Falcon

ELITE MEMBER
Jul 3, 2008
14,335
-4
5,503
Country
Location
I dont agree paf made a right choice it is a panic tion

We should have thoight of gripens in small numbers
Gripen had worlds best EW suits

And complimented with Erieye AWACS in paf

Not a wise choice
I have faith in PAF.
Good but there should be sense

Paf did failed in kargil by not buying bvr missiles on time but india did this is why india bombed tiger hill our jets could not stopped them due to bvr with mirages

We lost it we lost ASW atlantique also

Accept the facts. Dont put faith blindly

Fact is there r some weaknesses which ignored

I have faith on ALLAH but dosent. Mean i do nothing
J 10 against sukhois and mirages will do better but rafale dont have chance

Last edited:

Super Falcon

ELITE MEMBER
Jul 3, 2008
14,335
-4
5,503
Country
Location
I think psf wasting time and money on un necesary things guy in video mentioned beautyfully weknesses which are very genuine

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 4, Members: 3, Guests: 1)

Top Bottom

The J-10’s deployment in sensitive areas like the Taiwan Strait and its role in military exercises underscore its importance in China’s military posturing, aimed at asserting territorial claims, deterring perceived threats from the U.S.

The J-10’s deployment in sensitive areas like the Taiwan Strait and its role in military exercises underscore its importance in China’s military posturing, aimed at asserting territorial claims, deterring perceived threats from the U.S.

The J-10’s deployment in sensitive areas like the Taiwan Strait and its role in military exercises underscore its importance in China’s military posturing, aimed at asserting territorial claims, deterring perceived threats from the U.S.

and its allies, and signaling China’s readiness to defend its interests in contested regions .

Title:

Content: Mock Attack On U.S. Navy Vessels Underway During Chinese Fighter’s ‘Unsafe Intercept’

The Chinese Navy staged a simulated attack on U.S. Navy warships in the South China Sea earlier this month.

byThomas Newdick| PUBLISHED Dec 30, 2022 12:31 PM
Share

The Chinese Navy simulated an attack on a U.S. Navy task group in the South China Sea on December 21, the same day that a Chinese J-11 fighter jet intercepted a U.S. Air Force RC-135 surveillance aircraft, in what the Pentagon termed an “unsafe maneuver.” While a video of the intercept was released yesterday, which you can read more about here, further details are now becoming available pointing to a large-scale Chinese exercise in the South China Sea, involving the aircraft carrier Shandong, as well as other undisclosed bomber and fighter aircraft.

“As part of that exercise, a strike group led by the Shandong simulated attacks on a U.S. Navy formation,” an official from an unnamed Asian country disclosed to the Financial Times. It was while this was happening that the armed People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) J-11BSH Flanker fighter jet intercepted the RC-135. That incident occurred within international airspace.

It’s now clear that there was significant air and naval activity in the South China Sea at the time, which also included refueling sorties above the Bashi Channel, the highly strategic straits which run from the southern end of Taiwan to the northern tip of the island of Luzon in the Philippines.

Intense Chinese military activity in the South China Sea is hardly unusual, although it’s interesting to note that, in this case, the exercise scenario apparently targeted U.S. Navy vessels specifically.

At the same, time, U.S. surveillance and maritime patrol aircraft are also regular visitors to the South China Sea, and the Bashi Channel in particular.

Indeed, it’s highly conceivable that the RC-135 that was intercepted was monitoring the same Chinese military drill as it unfolded in the air and in the waters of the South China Sea. In the past, the SCS Probing Initiative, hosted by the Peking University in Beijing, has claimed that “The U.S. military conducts three to five sorties to the South China Sea every day.”

On December 21, according to the SCS Probing Initiative, the U.S. military sent three P-8A maritime patrol aircraft, one RC-135V surveillance aircraft, and one E-3G airborne early warning and control aircraft from Clark Air Base and Kadena Air Base to operate over the South China Sea and south of the Taiwan Strait. The RC-135V in question could very well have been the one intercepted by the J-11.

Meanwhile, the PLAN’s most recently inducted aircraft carrier, Shandong, has also conducted previous exercises in the region, as have U.S. Navy carrier strike groups.

In fact, the intensity of U.S. carrier operations in the South China Sea has picked up in recent years. In July 2020, for example, two Nimitz class aircraft carriers, the USS Nimitz and USS Ronald Reagan took part in the first dual-carrier exercise held there in six years.

Notably, as of December 21, the PLAN also had another carrier task group conducting large-scale exercises, this time with Liaoning operating in the Philippine Sea. The ability of the PLAN to carry out simultaneous large-scale carrier operations in two different locations is a significant one, as carriers and out-of-area operations become more central to its concept of operations.

Overall, the events of December 21 reflect the patterns of activity that are increasingly commonplace for both China and the United States in the region.

Beijing claims the bulk of the South China Sea as its sovereign territory, contributing to this being the region’s most hotly contested body of water. Such claims are bolstered by China’s construction of controversial man-made islands in the region. These outposts have become increasingly militarized, part of China’s strategy for enforcing its expansive territorial claims despite significant international opposition. The same strategy also involves paramilitary vessels that are used to impede other nations’ access to fishing areas and energy resources.

In addition, the Bashi Channel serves as an important passageway from the South China Sea in the broader Pacific to the east, especially for Chinese submarines. These include the ballistic missile submarines at the sprawling Yulin Naval Base on Hainan Island, at the northern end of the South China Sea, which constitute an increasingly important part of Beijing’s strategic nuclear forces.

For the U.S. military, meanwhile, there is a clear requirement to monitor Chinese activities in the region, including exercises, but also gathering any kind of intelligence that could shed light on the capabilities of PLAN aircraft and ships, as well as tactics, techniques, and procedures. Of course, a close intercept by a J-11 on a U.S. strategic reconnaissance asset can also reveal critical intelligence details.

While the precise location of the RC-135 intercept, and of the simulated attacks on the U.S. Navy by the Shandong strike group, remain unclear, the issue of Taiwan also plays into the geopolitical backdrop of these and similar incidents.

The Chinese leadership has taken an increasingly aggressive stance toward Taiwan in recent years, while officials in the United States are now more openly expressing concerns that Beijing may seek to take control of the island sooner rather than later. The PLAN’s ability to frustrate any U.S. Navy operations that might be undertaken in support of Taiwan is clearly fundamental to success

As to the RC-135’s encounter with the J-11, a U.S. military spokesperson has confirmed to Reuters that the Chinese jet actually came within 10 feet of the surveillance plane’s wing, but 20 feet from its nose. It was the position of the Chinese jet off the nose of the RC-135 which reportedly caused the U.S. aircraft to take evasive maneuvers to avoid a collision.

The video that has been presented doesn’t appear to show the J-11 in extremely close proximity to the RC-135, or undertaking overtly hazardous maneuvers, something that former RC-135 pilot and contributor to The War Zone, Robert S Hopkins III, has observed:

Still, the Chinese Flanker is shown coming close to the RC-135 in a manner in which keeping visual separation may have been impeded for the pilot flying the fighter and we don't know what else happened that was not shown in the video. But by the DoD's account, some evasive maneuvering occurred, which we do not see.

Regardless, the Pentagon clearly considers that the action by the J-11 fits within a wider pattern of “dangerous behavior” by Chinese military aircraft, especially over the highly contested South China Sea.

Repeated incidents have been described variously as risky or unprofessional, although it’s also apparent that these encompass a range of different actions by the Chinese aircraft, some of which are clearly more dangerous than others.

In July, Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that China had become more aggressive in its intercepts of U.S. and allied military aircraft. U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin has also raised his concerns about this issue in a recent meeting with Chinese Minister of Defense Wei Fenghe.

Some actions by Chinese aircraft in recent months have been more overtly threatening. A case in point is the incident in May this year, when an Australian P-8A was damaged by countermeasures launched by a Chinese J-16 Flanker fighter jet over the South China Sea, according to the Australian Department of Defense.

In an incident that you can read more about here, the J-16 is said to have cut across and in front of the Australian patrol plane before releasing chaff, which is normally used to blind and confuse radars, but which would cause serious damage if ingested into an engine.

In response to the P-8 incident, the Chinese Ministry of Defense stated that the “countermeasures taken by the Chinese military are professional, safe, reasonable, and legitimate.”

Beijing frames military activities by the United States and its allies as a threat to peace in the region, issuing sharp rebukes to U.S. Navy warships conducting so-called Freedom of Navigation Patrols, or FONOPs. Meanwhile, its claims over most of the South China Sea and Taiwan remain steadfast.

So far, the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command has not provided any more details about the December 21 incident, or the scope of the Chinese exercise, but the issue of the RC-135 intercept has been raised with the Chinese government. The Ministry of Defense in Beijing and the Chinese Embassy in the United States are yet to comment.

With no obvious signs that the overall geopolitical situation in the region is set to change any time soon, it seems more likely than not that we will see more incidents involving the PLAN and the U.S. military — and its allies — in this strategic area.

Large-scale exercises like those undertaken by China in the South China Sea on December 21, and the RC-135 intercept that took place concurrently, also highlight the dangers of inadvertent conflict — if only through a misunderstanding — that are always present in these kinds of high-stakes encounters.

Contact the author: thomas@thedrive.com

Title:

Content: What's new

J 10 CP is really a good Enough to Counter Rafale and S 400

Super Falcon

ELITE MEMBER
Jul 3, 2008
14,335
-4
5,503
Country
Location
Guys there are some facts we blindly ignore as patwaris

If j 10 brings same weapon package as thunder the major difference wont be much and russian engine do not produce enogh power to let AESA radar of J 10 work at its full potential

Only. Difference is
Better manuverability
Carry more missiles

For me its not enough

India have signed a deal to upgrade all rafales to F4 varient standard which has better protection with dummy target to save it self from imminent destruction

Rafale has better instantaneous turn rate than j 10
J 10 has some major flaws

Super Falcon

ELITE MEMBER
Jul 3, 2008
14,335
-4
5,503
Country
Location
I dont agree paf made a right choice it is a panic tion

We should have thoight of gripens in small numbers
Gripen had worlds best EW suits

And complimented with Erieye AWACS in paf

Not a wise choice
I have faith in PAF.
Good but there should be sense

Paf did failed in kargil by not buying bvr missiles on time but india did this is why india bombed tiger hill our jets could not stopped them due to bvr with mirages

We lost it we lost ASW atlantique also

Accept the facts. Dont put faith blindly

Fact is there r some weaknesses which ignored

I have faith on ALLAH but dosent. Mean i do nothing
J 10 against sukhois and mirages will do better but rafale dont have chance

Last edited:

Super Falcon

ELITE MEMBER
Jul 3, 2008
14,335
-4
5,503
Country
Location
I think psf wasting time and money on un necesary things guy in video mentioned beautyfully weknesses which are very genuine

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 4, Members: 3, Guests: 1)

Top Bottom

In summary, the export market for China’s J-10 fighter jets is currently centered on Pakistan, which has received 25 J-10C aircraft with positive assessments from analysts and officials.

In summary, the export market for China’s J-10 fighter jets is currently centered on Pakistan, which has received 25 J-10C aircraft with positive assessments from analysts and officials.

In summary, the export market for China’s J-10 fighter jets is currently centered on Pakistan, which has received 25 J-10C aircraft with positive assessments from analysts and officials.

The jet’s operational use in China’s military exercises, incursions, and joint drills with other nations further underscores its strategic and tactical value.

The jet’s operational use in China’s military exercises, incursions, and joint drills with other nations further underscores its strategic and tactical value.

The jet’s operational use in China’s military exercises, incursions, and joint drills with other nations further underscores its strategic and tactical value.

Media and expert commentary generally recognize

Media and expert commentary generally recognize

Media and expert commentary generally recognize