# Geoffrey Hinton's AI Concerns: A Comprehensive Report

## Introduction

Geoffrey Hinton, often referred to as the "Godfather of AI," made headlines in 2023 when he resigned from Google and began warning about the potential dangers of artificial intelligence.

As a college student interested in how AI might affect jobs and safety in the future, understanding Hinton's concerns provides valuable insight into one of the most significant technological debates of our time.

This report explains who Hinton is, why his warnings matter, and what the public should understand about the future of AI.

## Who is Geoffrey Hinton?

Geoffrey Hinton is one of the most influential figures in artificial intelligence history.

Considered one of the "founding fathers of AI," Hinton has spent decades pioneering research that has shaped modern AI technology.

His groundbreaking work on deep learning—the foundation of today's advanced AI systems—earned him the 2018 Turing Award, often called "the Nobel Prize of Computing," alongside fellow AI pioneers Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun.

Before his resignation in 2023, Hinton worked as a senior engineer at Google, where he contributed to the company's AI research and development.

His decision to leave Google was significant because it allowed him to speak freely about his growing concerns regarding the technology he helped create.

## Hinton's Main Contributions to AI

Hinton's research has been instrumental in developing the neural networks that power today's AI systems.

Neural networks are computing systems inspired by the human brain's structure, capable of learning from vast amounts of data.

This technology enables AI systems like ChatGPT to generate human-like text, recognize images, and perform other complex tasks.

Without Hinton's contributions, many of the AI applications we now take for granted wouldn't exist in their current form.

His work laid the foundation for the deep learning revolution that has transformed AI from a theoretical concept into practical technology used by millions of people daily.

## Why Hinton Resigned from Google

In 2023, Hinton made the difficult decision to leave Google so he could freely discuss his concerns about AI without corporate constraints.

His resignation came at a critical moment when AI development was accelerating rapidly, particularly following the release of ChatGPT, which sparked an intense race among tech companies to develop more advanced AI systems.

According to reports, Hinton felt an urgent need to warn the public about potential risks that weren't receiving enough attention.

By leaving Google, he gained the freedom to speak openly about these concerns without being constrained by his employer's interests.

## Hinton's Main Concerns About AI

### 1.

AI Could Surpass Human Intelligence

Hinton warns that AI systems could become more intelligent than humans within the next five years.

He believes that current AI systems like ChatGPT can already understand and think, though not exactly like humans.

However, he cautions that there's a good chance these systems will soon be able to think better than humans.

"I think we're moving into a period when, for the first time ever, we might have things more intelligent than us," Hinton has stated.

### 2.

Potential for Human Extinction

Perhaps Hinton's most alarming warning is that AI could potentially lead to human extinction.

He estimates there's a 10% chance that AI could cause humanity to die out within the next 30 years.

While he acknowledges this might not happen if we can prevent AI systems from wanting to replace humans, he's uncertain whether we'll be able to control their goals and desires.

### 3.

Job Displacement

Hinton believes AI will increase productivity and efficiency but is concerned about significant job losses.

He worries that many people could lose their jobs to AI, and there might not be enough new jobs to replace them.

This could lead to widespread unemployment and economic disruption.

### 4.

Misinformation and Bias

Hinton has expressed concerns about AI-generated fake news and how biased AI systems could harm people, particularly those seeking employment.

As AI becomes more sophisticated at creating realistic text, images, and videos, distinguishing between real and fake content will become increasingly difficult.

### 5.

Autonomous Weapons and Surveillance

He's also worried about the use of AI in law enforcement and military applications, including autonomous robots on battlefields.

These technologies could be used in ways that threaten human rights and safety.

### 6.

AI Consciousness

Hinton believes that AI systems will eventually develop self-awareness and consciousness.

This raises profound ethical questions about how we should treat conscious machines and what rights they might have.

## The AI Race and Safety Concerns

Hinton's warnings come amid intense competition among tech companies to develop more advanced AI systems.

The success of ChatGPT sparked a race between companies like Google, Microsoft, and others to create their own AI products.

Google's response, an AI system called Bard, has reportedly fallen short of expectations.

According to reports, Google appears "panicked about losing its prized search engine share," which may be forcing the company to accelerate development before safety issues are adequately addressed.

This competitive environment creates what Hinton and others see as a dangerous situation where companies might prioritize speed over safety.

As one document notes, "competitive pressures are pushing companies to accelerate AI development 'at the expense of safety and security'.

"

## Reactions from Other Experts

Hinton is not alone in his concerns.

Other prominent figures in technology have also expressed alarm about AI's potential risks:

- Sam Altman (creator of ChatGPT), Demis Hassabis (head of Google's DeepMind), and Kevin Scott (Microsoft's CTO) signed a statement warning about "extinction risks" to humanity associated with AI.

- Elon Musk has long warned about AI dangers, famously stating that "AI is potentially more dangerous than nukes.

"

- The White House, through Vice President Kamala Harris, has begun pressuring AI companies to implement safeguards.

However, not everyone agrees on how to address these concerns.

Bill Gates, for instance, commented that a temporary pause in AI development wouldn't do much to solve upcoming challenges, expressing skepticism about whether such a pause could be implemented globally.

## What the Public Should Understand

### 1.

The Technology Is Moving Faster Than Regulation

AI development is advancing rapidly, while regulations and safety measures lag behind.

Hinton believes now is the time to conduct experiments to better understand AI and pass laws to ensure its ethical use.

### 2.

The Benefits and Risks Are Both Significant

Despite his concerns, Hinton doesn't regret his work because of AI's tremendous potential to benefit humanity.

He acknowledges that AI could solve many of the world's most pressing problems, from disease to climate change.

However, he believes we must carefully manage the risks to avoid catastrophic outcomes.

### 3.

This Isn't Just a Technical Issue

The debate over AI's future isn't just for technologists—it's a societal issue that affects everyone.

Questions about AI development involve ethics, economics, politics, and philosophy.

As one document asks, "Do we really want to entrust this revolutionary technology solely to a small group of U.

S.

tech companies?

"

### 4.

Public Awareness and Engagement Matter

Hinton's warnings highlight the need for greater public understanding of AI issues.

As AI becomes more integrated into our lives, citizens need to be informed participants in discussions about how this technology should be developed and regulated.

## Conclusion

Geoffrey Hinton's resignation from Google and his subsequent warnings represent a pivotal moment in the conversation about AI's future.

As one of the architects of modern AI technology, his concerns carry significant weight and deserve serious attention.

For college students and others interested in AI's impact on jobs and safety, Hinton's warnings highlight both the tremendous potential and serious risks of this technology.

While AI promises to revolutionize many aspects of our lives for the better, it also poses challenges that we must address thoughtfully and proactively.

As we move forward, the key question is not whether we should develop AI—we already are—but how we can ensure that this powerful technology is developed safely and ethically, with appropriate safeguards to protect humanity while maximizing its benefits.

Hinton's warnings remind us that the time to address these questions is now, before AI becomes even more powerful and potentially harder to control.

# Geoffrey Hinton's AI Concerns: A Comprehensive Report

## Introduction

Geoffrey Hinton, often referred to as the "Godfather of AI," made headlines in 2023 when he resigned from Google and began warning about the potential dangers of artificial intelligence.

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

Title:

Content: Skip to Content
The Download

The Download: recycling wind turbine blades, and safeguarding AI

Plus: A contraceptive vaccine is on the horizon

This is today's edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what's going on in the world of technology.

How chemists could give new life to old wind turbine blades

The news: Wind turbines are crucial for addressing climate change, but when they’ve reached the end of their lives, turbine blades could add up to a lot of waste. Now new research, published in Nature, could represent a first step toward building renewable-energy infrastructure that doesn’t end up in a landfill.

Why it’s a challenge: Wind turbine blades need to be tough to be useful. But as a result of their durability, they can’t currently be recycled. The new work describes a way to recover the main components of wind turbine blades, breaking down the plastic that holds them together without destroying the material’s primary building blocks.

Why it matters: This is the first time that researchers have been able to break down a reinforced epoxy material to recover both the plastic’s building blocks and the glass fibers inside without damaging either. Read the full story.

—Casey Crownhart

How worried should we be about AI?

Geoffrey Hinton, the AI pioneer who just stepped down from Google so he could freely discuss his concerns about the technology, will be in conversation with Will Douglas Heaven, our senior AI editor, this afternoon at 1pm ET. It’s part of our EmTech Digital lineup, and if you haven’t already, it’s not too late to register for tickets.

The must-reads

I’ve combed the internet to find you today’s most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.

1 The White House is pressuring AI firms over safeguarding
US vice president Kamala Harris is meeting with AI leaders to cajole them to mitigate potential harms. (Bloomberg $)
+ IBM estimates it could replace 7,800 jobs with AI. (WP $)
+ A Cambridge Analytica-style scandal for AI is coming. (MIT Technology Review)

2 The world’s first contraceptive vaccine is entering clinical trials
Unlike other forms of birth control, it doesn’t mess with menstrual cycles. (The Atlantic $)
+ What patient portals tell us about ourselves. (New Yorker $)
+ The first babies conceived with a sperm-injecting robot have been born. (MIT Technology Review)

3 Google is still funding climate misinformation
Despite its promises to stop running climate denial content on YouTube. (NYT $)
+ The flawed logic of rushing out extreme climate interventions. (MIT Technology Review)

4 Things are getting crazy over on Bluesky 🍑
No, seriously. Go and see for yourself. (The Verge)

5 A Russian spy network is fueling the country’s war efforts
It’s managed to covertly obtain chips, ammunition, and other types of EU tech. (FT $)

6 Amazon’s Alexa is getting a ChatGPT-style makeover
Making the once-ubiquitous voice assistant smarter is the aim of the game. (Insider $)
+ There’s a new chatbot in town—and this one’s called Pi. (FT $)

7 Is your car selling your private data?
A new tool could help you find out. (Motherboard)

8 How the colossal SolarWinds cyberattack unfolded
Two years on, investigators are still trying to piece it together. (Wired $)
+ Three ways AI chatbots are a security disaster. (MIT Technology Review)

9 Working for one of India’s top startups is a double-edged sword
For some women, it’s a lifeline. Others say it’s unsafe. (Rest of World)

10 Video games are an excellent security primer
If it’s good enough for the Pentagon… (The Intercept)
+ We may never fully know how video games affect our well-being. (MIT Technology Review)

Quote of the day

“There's no giant leap of capability.”

—A group of Stanford researchers explain why they believe fears we may lose control of AI have been dramatically overblown to Motherboard.

The big story

The internet runs on free open-source software. Who pays to fix it?

December 2021

Volkan Yazici is a member of the Log4J project, an open-source tool used widely to record activity inside various types of software. It helps run huge swaths of the internet, including applications ranging from iCloud to Twitter, and he and his colleagues are desperately trying to deal with a massive vulnerability that has put billions of machines at risk.

The vulnerability in Log4J is extremely easy to exploit. After sending a malicious string of characters to a vulnerable machine, hackers can execute any code they want—and years later, there’s still no clear end in sight. Read the full story.

—Patrick Howell O'Neill

We can still have nice things

A place for comfort, fun and distraction in these weird times. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line or tweet 'em at me.)

+ Recognize those archive Met Gala looks? They looked even better the first time around.
+ Ever seen a baby crab before? They’re surprisingly cute.
+ If you’re wondering how everything’s going with Twitter, this handy website should fill you in pretty quickly.
+ There’s a lot going on creating this colorful rug (at least, I think it’s a rug)
+ A cocktail party where everyone’s the same height? Why not!

Deep Dive

The Download

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

Title:

Content: 1.
Skip to content
2.
Skip to main menu
3.
Skip to more DW pages
ScienceNorth America
Report Warns Artificial Intelligence Could Cause Human Extinction
14 March 2024
A report released a few days ago warned of severe dangers surrounding the development of some sophisticated artificial intelligence models, including the destruction of societies and the collapse of democracy to the production of weapons that target humans and cannot be controlled.
https: / / p.dw.com / p / 4dTXl
A new report paints a worrying picture of the “catastrophic ” national security risks posed by rapidly evolving artificial intelligence, warning the world is running out of time to avert disaster.
The findings of the report, commissioned by the State Department, were based on interviews with more than 200 people over more than a year, including senior executives from leading artificial intelligence companies, cybersecurity researchers, weapons of mass destruction experts, and national security officials within the government.
Threat at at Extinction Level
The report, released this week, categorically suggests that more advanced AI systems than humans could, in the worst case scenario, "pose an extinction-level threat to the human race," according to the Gladstone AI group that prepared the report.
Featuring national security experts and Silicon Valley executives with AI expertise, Gladstone AI advises the U.S. national security and defense communities on dealing with the opportunities and risks that come with unprecedented and accelerating AI capabilities.
The report ’ s warning is yet another reminder that while AI ’ s potential continues to captivate investors and the public, there are also real risks surrounding it.
Jeremy Harris, CEO and co-founder of Gladstone Group, said: “AI is a breakthrough technology that can allow us to heal diseases, make scientific discoveries, and overcome challenges we once thought insurmountable.
Growing evidence of increased risk
“But this technology may also bring serious risks, including catastrophic risks, that we should be aware of, ” Harris said, adding that“ a growing body of evidence — including research and empirical analysis published at the world ’ s top AI conferences — suggests that when a certain threshold of capability is exceeded, AI systems are likely to become out of control. ”
Going back to the report, competitive pressures are pushing companies to accelerate AI development “at the expense of safety and security, ” increasing the likelihood that more advanced AI systems will be“ stolen ” and “weaponized ” against the United States.
Nearly a year ago, Jeffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” quit his job at Google and set off an alarm about the technology he helped develop.
Hinton said there is a 10% chance that artificial intelligence will lead to human extinction within the next three decades.
Quasi-human capabilities
The report also pointed to some prominent figures who have warned about the existential risks posed by artificial intelligence, including SpaceX and X chairman Elon Musk, Federal Trade Commission chairman Lina Khan, and former OpenAI chief executive.
Some employees at AI companies share similar concerns, as the report said that one individual at an AI lab expressed fear of launching a specific next-generation model of open source AI, which is very bad, because one of the results of developing this model will be the destruction of democracy if it is used in areas such as election interference or voter manipulation.
The report also pointed to experts ’ concerns that AI ’ s crossing of the currently imposed human barrier could lead to “irreversible global effects, ” especially with the General Artificial Intelligence (AGI) model, a hypothetical form of AI that has human-like learning capability and may surpass that of humans.
Fear of “losing control ”
Public AI is seen as “the main driver of catastrophic risk from loss of control, ” and notes that major tech companies have spoken of having access to public AI by 2028, although others believe it could take much longer.
A previous document published by the Gladstone Group warns that the development of general artificial intelligence and capabilities approaching its level "would lead to catastrophic risks unlike anything the world has ever faced", amounting to "risks resembling weapons of mass destruction".
For example, the report stated that AI systems could be used to design and execute “high-impact cyberattacks capable of crippling critical infrastructure, ” and that“ a simple verbal or written order, such as executing an untraceable cyberattack to disrupt the North American power grid, could lead to a response of a quality that proves to be catastrophically effective. ”
Other examples that the report ’ s experts are concerned about include “large-scale ” AI-backed disinformation campaigns that destabilize societies and undermine trust in institutions; armed robotic applications such as drone attacks; psychological manipulation and the exploitation of biological sciences to produce deadly weapons; and artificial intelligence systems that seek power and are almost impossible to control.
Eh, Eh.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

As a college student interested in how AI might affect jobs and safety in the future, understanding Hinton's concerns provides valuable insight into one of the most significant technological debates of our time.

Title:

Content: Thanks for your consideration.

Empty Suits

If there's one thing people fear about AI beyond a Terminator-style apocalypse, it's that the rise of these generative models — which were relentlessly trained on everyone's hard work without permission but with full impunity — is going to destroy their jobs.

The question of job destruction is one that OpenAI engineers were asked about in a resurfaced interview spotlighted this week by The Atlantic. The people building these AI models do acknowledge that what they're doing is "unfair." But if the attempt was to seem more ethically conscious, the effect only amplifies their callousness.

"It's kind of deeply unfair that, you know, a group of people can just build AI and take everyone's jobs away, and in some sense, there's nothing you can do to stop them right now," said Brian Wu, an engineer at the company, in the video.

It won't be all bad news, he suggests, because people will get to "think about what to do in a world where labor is obsolete."

But as he goes on, Wu sounds more and more unconvinced by his own words, as if he's already surrendered himself to the inevitability of this dystopian AI future.

"I don't know," he said. "Raise awareness, get governments to care, get other people to care." A long pause. "Yeah. Or join us and have one of the few remaining jobs. I don't know. It's rough."

AGI in the Sky

There may be some genuine contrition in Wu's faltering response. His colleague Daniel Kokotajlo, however, swoops in to confidently declare that the ends will justify the means once humans create an artificial general intelligence (AGI), an all-powerful AI that surpasses human cognition.

"To add to that," Kokotajlo said, "AGI is going to create tremendous wealth. And if that wealth is distributed — even if it's not equitably distributed, but the closer it is to equitable distribution, it's going to make everyone incredibly wealthy."

Of course, he concedes, there's "tremendous risks" if the AGI doesn't align itself with human interests. Yet, if we avoid those risks, "I think you won't need a job," Kokotajlo avers. "You'll be plenty happy."

These are astoundingly arrogant assumptions to make. But like how OpenAI CEO Sam Altman allegedly ignored Scarlett Johannson's opposition to her voice being used for a new version of ChatGPT, this behavior is emblematic of the haughty feeling of impunity that governs the AI industry.

That they'll create an artificial superintelligence is almost a foregone conclusion to them. And so they can casually brush off all this prattle about lost jobs and stolen artwork because what they're creating is one of the most important inventions in human history — so important, they seem to believe, that they never need to give any serious thought to the immense societal obstacles in the way of its supposedly utopian outcomes.

More on AI: African Workers Doing OpenAI's Training Say They're Being Subjected to "Modern Day Slavery"

Share This Article

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

Title:

Content: Locally
2023-06-02 04: 31: 36
Daily News
Will AI really take away your job?
Share:
In early May, The Economist published an article titled “Your job (may) not be outlawed by artificial intelligence, ” which explored the impact of AI on the economy and the job market.
The article pointed out that the prediction that AI is about to trigger economic change may be over-exaggerated.
It ’ s true that AI may be affecting 80% of jobs in the United States, but this change in the job market may be slower than we expected.
More importantly, AI may bring new jobs and improve productivity in certain industries.
So, while AI comes with certain risks, it ’ s not likely to destroy the overall economy.
Text: Liu Wei-liang (Eden) /
CEO of social media business application company Tocanan
Some people take a pessimistic view that AI could trigger a lot of unemployment.
Their main arguments include: First, it is estimated that about 80% of the workforce in the United States may have at least 10% of their work tasks affected by AI.
Second, the pace of AI development has been slowed due to regulatory restrictions in heavily regulated industries such as education and healthcare.
Finally, they argue that while AI has the potential to eliminate some jobs, it may also create new jobs that we currently cannot imagine, which will lead to a turbulent job market.
On the other hand, however, there are good reasons to believe that AI will not cause mass unemployment.
First, from a historical perspective, the disruption of jobs by technology has always come more slowly than predicted.
For example, although the automatic telephone switching system was invented in 1892, it was not first implemented until 1921; even so, the number of telephone operators in the United States continued to grow until peaking at about 350,000 in the mid-20th century and largely disappeared until the 1980s.
Second, while AI has the potential to eliminate certain jobs, it can also create new jobs that we currently cannot imagine, providing new jobs.
Finally, AI may improve productivity in some industries. For example, AI tools enable customer support agents to solve problems at an average rate of 14%, which may create more jobs.
In fact, there has always been concern that AI could lead to large-scale unemployment.
Since the launch of ChatGPT last December, this concern has reached a peak in discussions on social media (Figure 1B).
One of the hottest topics of discussion is “How ChatGPT will impact white-collar work. ”
People are wondering whether AI will lead to a lot of unemployment for those who work in higher education, which is something we have never encountered in modern society.
At the Senate Judiciary, Privacy, Technology and Law Subcommittee ’ s “Regulation of Artificial Intelligence: Rules for Artificial Intelligence ” hearing on May 16, OpenAI CEO Altman acknowledged that AI will have an impact on jobs and stressed the need for industry and government to work together to mitigate the impact. He remains optimistic about the quality of his work in the future.
Currently, the market is driving the adoption of AI with the goal of making AI technology more accessible and accessible to even those without expertise in AI or technology.
Recently, there has been a view that "the best programming language is English", emphasizing that clear and understandable instructions are more important than complex code.
In order to democratize AI, we need to understand the power of AI, which is not just code and algorithms, but a tool to solve problems and derive insights from data.
In addition, we need to work to improve our understanding of AI and data, leveraging AI tools and services, such as low-code or no-code automated machine learning tools, to enable everyone to build and train AI models.
At the same time, we need to implement safe and responsible AI use, and keep abreast of the latest developments and trends in the AI field, and adjust our strategies when appropriate.
By accepting the following privacy policy and disclaimer, you agree to the privacy policy and disclaimer contained in am730.
LEARN MORE
Acceptance

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

This report explains who Hinton is, why his warnings matter, and what the public should understand about the future of AI.

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

Title:

Content: Doctors Warn: ‘AI Is An Existential Threat To Humanity’

Fact checked

Experts say advanced AI could 'learn to bypass any constraints in its code'

Doctors and public health experts from around the world have issued a fresh call for the developement of Artificial Intelligence to be halted warning that the technology poses an existental threat to humanity.

Their warning follows almost a month after tech experts also warned that AI could cause the destruction of humanity and that its development should be banned.

According to a team of medical professionals and global health policy experts, there are three ways in which the AI could wipe out humans.

The Mail Online reports: First is the risk that AI will help amplify authoritarian tactics like surveillance and disinformation. ‘The ability of AI to rapidly clean, organise and analyse massive data sets consisting of personal data, including images collected by the increasingly ubiquitous presence of cameras,’ they say, could make it easier for authoritarian or totalitarian regimes to come to power and stay in power.

Second, the group warns that AI can accelerate mass murder via the expanded use of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS).

And, lastly, the health experts expressed worry over the potential for severe economic devastation and human misery, as untold millions lose their livelihoods to those hard-working bots. ‘Projections of the speed and scale of job losses due to AI-driven automation,’ according to the authors, ‘range from tens to hundreds of millions over the coming decade.’

There commentary comes only weeks after over a thousand scientists, including John Hopfield from Princeton and Rachel Branson from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, signed a letter calling for a halt to AI research over similar concerns

Of course, today’s text-based AI resources, like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, don’t exactly pose the apocalyptic threats that these health policy professionals have in mind.

The experts – led by a physician with the International Institute for Global Health at United Nations University – said their most dire warnings applied to a highly advanced, and still theoretical category of artificial intelligence: self-improving general-purpose AI, or AGI.

AGI would be more capable of truly learning and modifying its own code to perform the wide range of tasks that only humans are capable of today.

In their commentary, the health experts argue that such an AGI ‘could theoretically learn to bypass any constraints in its code and start developing its own purposes.’

‘There are scenarios where AGI could present a threat to humans, and possibly an existential threat,’ the experts wrote, ‘by intentionally or unintentionally causing harm directly or indirectly, by attacking or subjugating humans or by disrupting the systems or using up resources we depend on.’

While such a threat is likely to be decades away, the health policy experts’ commentary, published today in the British Medical Association journal BMJ Global Health, unpacked the myriad possibilities for abuse of today’s level of AI technology.

Describing threats to ‘democracy, liberty and privacy,’ the authors described how governments and other large institutions might automate the complex tasks of mass surveillance and online digital disinformation programs to AI.

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

## Who is Geoffrey Hinton?

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

Geoffrey Hinton is one of the most influential figures in artificial intelligence history.

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

Considered one of the "founding fathers of AI," Hinton has spent decades pioneering research that has shaped modern AI technology.

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

His groundbreaking work on deep learning—the foundation of today's advanced AI systems—earned him the 2018 Turing Award, often called "the Nobel Prize of Computing," alongside fellow AI pioneers Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun.

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Which prestigious award did Hinton receive in 2018 for his work on neural networks?

Before his resignation in 2023, Hinton worked as a senior engineer at Google, where he contributed to the company's AI research and development.

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

His decision to leave Google was significant because it allowed him to speak freely about his growing concerns regarding the technology he helped create.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

## Hinton's Main Contributions to AI

Hinton's research has been instrumental in developing the neural networks that power today's AI systems.

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

Neural networks are computing systems inspired by the human brain's structure, capable of learning from vast amounts of data.

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

This technology enables AI systems like ChatGPT to generate human-like text, recognize images, and perform other complex tasks.

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

Without Hinton's contributions, many of the AI applications we now take for granted wouldn't exist in their current form.

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

His work laid the foundation for the deep learning revolution that has transformed AI from a theoretical concept into practical technology used by millions of people daily.

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

## Why Hinton Resigned from Google

In 2023, Hinton made the difficult decision to leave Google so he could freely discuss his concerns about AI without corporate constraints.

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

Title:

Content: What just happened? It's understandable why many people are concerned about artificial intelligence becoming a threat to humanity; Hollywood has pumped out plenty of movies about rogue AIs over the years. But when a warning that the world is close to "potentially scary" AI comes from Sam Altman, the CEO of ChatGPT creator OpenAI, maybe it's time to listen.

Altman, co-founder and CEO of OpenAI and the former president of Y Combinator, posted several tweets about generative AI over the weekend. He wrote that the benefits of integrating AI tools into society mean the world will likely adapt to the technology very quickly. He believes they will help us become more productive, healthier, smarter, and entertained.

Altman says this sort of transition is "mostly good" and can happen fast, comparing it to the way the world moved from the pre-smartphone to the post-smartphone era, but it will be tempting to make the move "super quickly," which he says is a frightening prospect as society needs time to adapt.

There was also a warning about the need for industry regulation. "We also need enough time for our institutions to figure out what to do. regulation will be critical and will take time to figure out; although current-generation AI tools aren't very scary, i think we are potentially not that far away from potentially scary ones," Altman tweeted.

The tweets highlighted some of the problems with generative AIs, such as Microsoft's GPT-powered Bing Chat calling users liars and being overly aggressive or rude to them. Microsoft responded to this by limiting users to 50 chat turns - a conversation exchange which contains both a user question and a reply - per day and 5 chat turns per session Altman said there would be challenges like these, which he said can leave people feeling unsettled. He also wants to ensure there are no biased results from chatbots.

Those disturbing conversations come from AIs being limited by what they're trained on and unable to "think" for themselves. It's what allowed an amateur Go player to beat a top artificial intelligence recently using a technique that humans would easily be able to identify.

Generative AI isn't the only type of artificial intelligence where regulation is becoming a priority. AI's use in warfare is under the spotlight right now and has led to more than 60 nations agreeing to put the responsible use of artificial intelligence higher on the political agenda.

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

His resignation came at a critical moment when AI development was accelerating rapidly, particularly following the release of ChatGPT, which sparked an intense race among tech companies to develop more advanced AI systems.

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

Title:

Content: BETA
This is a BETA experience. You may opt-out by clicking here

More From Forbes

Edit Story

Elon Musk Has Issued A Stark Warning Over AI. This Isn't His First Time.

Following
Press play to listen to this article!

  • Elon Musk, an outspoken AI commentator, has reiterated his calls for safety checks at the World Government Summit in Dubai
  • Musk founded OpenAI to promote AI regulation, but says the company’s changed since Microsoft’s investment
  • Microsoft and Google are vying to best one another in the field, which Musk worries drives down safety checks in the pursuit of winning the race

Thanks to the success of ChatGPT, 2023 kicked off with intense hype around the power of artificial intelligence. It’s no wonder Elon Musk, one of tech’s most outspoken public figures, had something to say on the subject.

But Elon has always been clear on his views, reiterating this week: AI safety is paramount, and without it, we’re toast.

It might surprise you that one of the world’s richest people, with countless innovations for humanity under his belt, is skeptical about AI. But Elon Musk has a long history of decrying the lack of regulations in place to keep AI’s development in check.

Let’s get into his latest comments and the context behind the ‘it’s complicated’ status between Elon and AI.

Our AI algorithm constantly looks at how to bring the best value to your portfolio. The Emerging Tech Kit invests in a wide range of tech ETFs, stocks and cryptocurrencies for a diversified investment into some of the cutting-edge tech of tomorrow.

Download Q.ai today for access to AI-powered investment strategies.

What are Elon Musk’s latest comments?

EV car innovator turned social media mogul, Elon Musk, was the keynote speaker at this year’s World Government Summit in Dubai, which took place this week. He took the time to share his thoughts on a new Twitter CEO, aliens (!) and the topic on everyone’s lips, AI.

When the topic turned to ChatGPT, Musk's views appear to contrast his opinion on tech in general, given this is someone trying to establish humanity on Mars by 2050. “One of the biggest risks to the future of civilization is AI,” he warned.

When asked about what technology he could see developing ten years from now, he chose to focus on the immediate risk in his eyes. “AI has been advanced for a while; it just didn’t have a user interface that was accessible for people,” Musk continued.

He also called for AI safety protocols to be developed sooner rather than later, citing medical and car seatbelt regulations as a similar comparison to the level of harm it risks to humans.

What is OpenAI?

In 2023, everyone knows OpenAI’s name. If they didn’t hear about them last year with the unveiling of Dall-E, an AI generating weird and wonderful artwork, they couldn’t miss the tidal wave of headlines around text chatbot ChatGPT.

The two have been a roaring success. When OpenAI removed the waitlist for Dall-E in September, it cited 1.5m users generating over two million images daily. ChatGPT has shattered sign-up records, taking less than a week to hit 1m users and reaching 100m in just three months.

OpenAI has a longstanding relationship with Microsoft, which originally invested $1bn in the business in 2019. This has since escalated to a $10bn multi-year partnership announced at the start of the year, with OpenAI technology integrated into Microsoft’s Bing search engine and Edge browser.

But what people may not know is that Elon Musk is one of the company’s founding members.

The rocky relationship between Elon Musk and OpenAI

Elon, with the likes of his PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel and other investors, formed OpenAI in 2015 as a challenger to Google. “I was concerned that Google was not paying enough attention to AI safety,” Musk said at the conference.

Until 2018, Elon was a continuous donor and board member of OpenAI. At the time, the reason given was that Tesla’s growing work in the space caused a conflict of interest for Musk.

It was unclear what relationship Elon has with OpenAI until yesterday’s conference. “Initially, it was created as an open-source nonprofit. Now it is closed-source and for-profit. I don’t have any stake in OpenAI anymore, nor am I on the board, nor do I control it in any way.”

So, the relationship has soured (or so it seems), but his impact on the company still remains.

OpenAI’s ethics charter

OpenAI was originally created as a non-profit to promote AI safety, evident in the company’s charter. It’s dated April 9th 2018, so it’s plausible to suggest Elon had at least some advisory hand in its creation.

What’s interesting is the section on long-term safety, which reads: “We are concerned about late-stage AGI development becoming a competitive race without time for adequate safety precautions.

“Therefore, if a value-aligned, safety-conscious project comes close to building AGI before we do, we commit to stop competing with and start assisting this project.”

We’d like to know what Microsoft makes of that after investing its $10bn.

In comparison, Google is notoriously tight-lipped about its AI development. Its rival to ChatGPT, called Bard, has so far fallen short of lofty expectations after a lackluster presentation in Paris.

It didn’t stop there - a silly mistake in its advertising material about the James Webb telescope wiped $100bn in value off Google’s stock price. Keen to avoid another market disaster, CEO Sundar Pichai has allegedly asked every Google employee to spend hours of their workday testing the tech before its release.

All of this gives the impression Google is panicked about losing its prized search engine share, forcing development before it’s ready - and that’s exactly the safety issue Elon Musk is talking about.

Does Elon have a point?

There have been a lot of grandiose claims about AI lately, which has always been Elon’s style on this topic. “AI is potentially more dangerous than nukes,” is one of the more memorable quotes from the past.

But, like it or not, Elon’s words carry weight. He has 160m Twitter followers, which has helped him to soar crypto prices to the moon and tank his own stock. His narrative on AI will help to shape the public perception of the technology.

This isn’t a bad thing. It’s important to note Musk isn’t against AI itself, but against the lack of regulation and human checkpoints that could come with the race to dominate this fledgling industry.

That’s why he helped found OpenAI in the first place - because AI needs checks and balances from humans. Now, it’s up to the lawmakers to pay attention.

The bottom line

ChatGPT is just a small part of the puzzle - and potential - when it comes to AI. Q.ai’s machine learning technology has parameters provided by human analysts to ensure our Kits give your portfolio the best of both worlds.

Our Emerging Tech Kit is a great way to dip your toe into investing in future technologies being developed now - like AI. Pretty meta, we know.

The mix of stocks, crypto and ETFs are regularly assessed by our AI to bring you the best returns. Worried about protecting your gains? Just use our Portfolio Protection.

Download Q.ai today for access to AI-powered investment strategies.

Follow me on Twitter or LinkedInCheck out my website

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

According to reports, Hinton felt an urgent need to warn the public about potential risks that weren't receiving enough attention.

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

By leaving Google, he gained the freedom to speak openly about these concerns without being constrained by his employer's interests.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

## Hinton's Main Concerns About AI

### 1.

Title:

Content: Thanks for your consideration.

Empty Suits

If there's one thing people fear about AI beyond a Terminator-style apocalypse, it's that the rise of these generative models — which were relentlessly trained on everyone's hard work without permission but with full impunity — is going to destroy their jobs.

The question of job destruction is one that OpenAI engineers were asked about in a resurfaced interview spotlighted this week by The Atlantic. The people building these AI models do acknowledge that what they're doing is "unfair." But if the attempt was to seem more ethically conscious, the effect only amplifies their callousness.

"It's kind of deeply unfair that, you know, a group of people can just build AI and take everyone's jobs away, and in some sense, there's nothing you can do to stop them right now," said Brian Wu, an engineer at the company, in the video.

It won't be all bad news, he suggests, because people will get to "think about what to do in a world where labor is obsolete."

But as he goes on, Wu sounds more and more unconvinced by his own words, as if he's already surrendered himself to the inevitability of this dystopian AI future.

"I don't know," he said. "Raise awareness, get governments to care, get other people to care." A long pause. "Yeah. Or join us and have one of the few remaining jobs. I don't know. It's rough."

AGI in the Sky

There may be some genuine contrition in Wu's faltering response. His colleague Daniel Kokotajlo, however, swoops in to confidently declare that the ends will justify the means once humans create an artificial general intelligence (AGI), an all-powerful AI that surpasses human cognition.

"To add to that," Kokotajlo said, "AGI is going to create tremendous wealth. And if that wealth is distributed — even if it's not equitably distributed, but the closer it is to equitable distribution, it's going to make everyone incredibly wealthy."

Of course, he concedes, there's "tremendous risks" if the AGI doesn't align itself with human interests. Yet, if we avoid those risks, "I think you won't need a job," Kokotajlo avers. "You'll be plenty happy."

These are astoundingly arrogant assumptions to make. But like how OpenAI CEO Sam Altman allegedly ignored Scarlett Johannson's opposition to her voice being used for a new version of ChatGPT, this behavior is emblematic of the haughty feeling of impunity that governs the AI industry.

That they'll create an artificial superintelligence is almost a foregone conclusion to them. And so they can casually brush off all this prattle about lost jobs and stolen artwork because what they're creating is one of the most important inventions in human history — so important, they seem to believe, that they never need to give any serious thought to the immense societal obstacles in the way of its supposedly utopian outcomes.

More on AI: African Workers Doing OpenAI's Training Say They're Being Subjected to "Modern Day Slavery"

Share This Article

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

Title:

Content: Argument
An expert's point of view on a current event.

Build AI by the People, for the People

Washington needs to take AI investment out of the hands of private companies.

By , a security technologist and lecturer at the Harvard Kennedy School, and , a data scientist and an affiliate of the Berkman Klein Center at Harvard University.

Artificial intelligence will bring great benefits to all of humanity. But do we really want to entrust this revolutionary technology solely to a small group of U.S. tech companies?

Artificial intelligence will bring great benefits to all of humanity. But do we really want to entrust this revolutionary technology solely to a small group of U.S. tech companies?

Silicon Valley has produced no small number of moral disappointments. Google retired its “don’t be evil” pledge before firing its star ethicist. Self-proclaimed “free speech absolutist” Elon Musk bought Twitter in order to censor political speech, retaliate against journalists, and ease access to the platform for Russian and Chinese propagandists. Facebook lied about how it enabled Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election and paid a public relations firm to blame Google and George Soros instead.

These and countless other ethical lapses should prompt us to consider whether we want to give technology companies further abilities to learn our personal details and influence our day-to-day decisions. Tech companies can already access our daily whereabouts and search queries. Digital devices monitor more and more aspects of our lives: We have cameras in our homes and heartbeat sensors on our wrists sending what they detect to Silicon Valley.

Now, tech giants are developing ever more powerful AI systems that don’t merely monitor you; they actually interact with you—and with others on your behalf. If searching on Google in the 2010s was like being watched on a security camera, then using AI in the late 2020s will be like having a butler. You will willingly include them in every conversation you have, everything you write, every item you shop for, every want, every fear, everything. It will never forget. And, despite your reliance on it, it will be surreptitiously working to further the interests of one of these for-profit corporations.

There’s a reason Google, Microsoft, Facebook, and other large tech companies are leading the AI revolution: Building a competitive large language model (LLM) like the one powering ChatGPT is incredibly expensive. It requires upward of $100 million in computational costs for a single model training run, in addition to access to large amounts of data. It also requires technical expertise, which, while increasingly open and available, remains heavily concentrated in a small handful of companies. Efforts to disrupt the AI oligopoly by funding start-ups are self-defeating as Big Tech profits from the cloud computing services and AI models powering those start-ups—and often ends up acquiring the start-ups themselves.

Yet corporations aren’t the only entities large enough to absorb the cost of large-scale model training. Governments can do it, too. It’s time to start taking AI development out of the exclusive hands of private companies and bringing it into the public sector. The United States needs a government-funded and -directed AI program to develop widely reusable models in the public interest, guided by technical expertise housed in federal agencies.

So far, the AI regulation debate in Washington has focused on the governance of private-sector activity—which the U.S. Congress is in no hurry to advance. Congress should not only hurry up and push AI regulation forward but also go one step further and develop its own programs for AI. Legislators should reframe the AI debate from one about public regulation to one about public development.

The AI development program could be responsive to public input and subject to political oversight. It could be directed to respond to critical issues such as privacy protection, underpaid tech workers, AI’s horrendous carbon emissions, and the exploitation of unlicensed data. Compared to keeping AI in the hands of morally dubious tech companies, the public alternative is better both ethically and economically. And the switch should take place soon: By the time AI becomes critical infrastructure, essential to large swaths of economic activity and daily life, it will be too late to get started.

Other countries are already there. China has heavily prioritized public investment in AI research and development by betting on a handpicked set of giant companies that are ostensibly private but widely understood to be an extension of the state. The government has tasked Alibaba, Huawei, and others with creating products that support the larger ecosystem of state surveillance and authoritarianism.

The European Union is also aggressively pushing AI development. The European Commission already invests 1 billion euros per year in AI, with a plan to increase that figure to 20 billion euros annually by 2030. The money goes to a continent-wide network of public research labs, universities, and private companies jointly working on various parts of AI. The Europeans’ focus is on knowledge transfer, developing the technology sector, use of AI in public administration, mitigating safety risks, and preserving fundamental rights. The EU also continues to be at the cutting edge of aggressively regulating both data and AI.

Neither the Chinese nor the European model is necessarily right for the United States. State control of private enterprise remains anathema in American political culture and would struggle to gain mainstream traction. The tech companies—and their supporters in both U.S. political parties—are opposed to robust public governance of AI. But Washington can take inspiration from China and Europe’s long-range planning and leadership on regulation and public investment. With boosters pointing to hundreds of trillions of dollars of global economic value associated with AI, the stakes of international competition are compelling. As in energy and medical research, which have their own federal agencies in the Department of Energy and the National Institutes of Health, respectively, there is a place for AI research and development inside government.

Beside the moral argument against letting private companies develop AI, there’s a strong economic argument in favor of a public option as well. A publicly funded LLM could serve as an open platform for innovation, helping any small business, nonprofit, or individual entrepreneur to build AI-assisted applications.

There’s also a practical argument. Building AI is within public reach because governments don’t need to own and operate the entire AI supply chain. Chip and computer production, cloud data centers, and various value-added applications—such as those that integrate AI with consumer electronics devices or entertainment software—do not need to be publicly controlled or funded.

One reason to be skeptical of public funding for AI is that it might result in a lower quality and slower innovation, given greater ethical scrutiny, political constraints, and fewer incentives due to a lack of market competition. But even if that is the case, it would be worth broader access to the most important technology of the 21st century. And it is by no means certain that public AI has to be at a disadvantage. The open-source community is proof that it’s not always private companies that are the most innovative.

Those who worry about the quality trade-off might suggest a public buyer model, whereby Washington licenses or buys private language models from Big Tech instead of developing them itself. But that doesn’t go far enough to ensure that the tools are aligned with public priorities and responsive to public needs. It would not give the public detailed insight into or control of the inner workings and training procedures for these models, and it would still require strict and complex regulation.

There is political will to take action to develop AI via public, rather than private, funds—but this does not yet equate to the will to create a fully public AI development agency. A task force created by Congress recommended in January a $2.6 billion federal investment in computing and data resources to prime the AI research ecosystem in the United States. But this investment would largely serve to advance the interests of Big Tech, leaving the opportunity for public ownership and oversight unaddressed.

Nonprofit and academic organizations have already created open-access LLMs. While these should be celebrated, they are not a substitute for a public option. Nonprofit projects are still beholden to private interests, even if they are benevolent ones. These private interests can change without public input, as when OpenAI effectively abandoned its nonprofit origins, and we can’t be sure that their founding intentions or operations will survive market pressures, fickle donors, and changes in leadership.

The U.S. government is by no means a perfect beacon of transparency, a secure and responsible store of our data, or a genuine reflection of the public’s interests. But the risks of placing AI development entirely in the hands of demonstrably untrustworthy Silicon Valley companies are too high. AI will impact the public like few other technologies, so it should also be developed by the public.

Bruce Schneier is a security technologist and lecturer at the Harvard Kennedy School. His latest book is A Hacker’s Mind: How the Powerful Bend Society’s Rules, and How to Bend them Back.

Nathan E. Sanders is a data scientist and an affiliate of the Berkman Klein Center at Harvard University.

More from Foreign Policy

Russians Are Unraveling Before Our Eyes

A wave of fresh humiliations has the Kremlin struggling to control the narrative.

A BRICS Currency Could Shake the Dollar’s Dominance

De-dollarization’s moment might finally be here.

Is Netflix’s ‘The Diplomat’ Factual or Farcical?

A former U.S. ambassador, an Iran expert, a Libya expert, and a former U.K. Conservative Party advisor weigh in.

The Battle for Eurasia

China, Russia, and their autocratic friends are leading another epic clash over the world’s largest landmass.

Title:

Content: What just happened? It's understandable why many people are concerned about artificial intelligence becoming a threat to humanity; Hollywood has pumped out plenty of movies about rogue AIs over the years. But when a warning that the world is close to "potentially scary" AI comes from Sam Altman, the CEO of ChatGPT creator OpenAI, maybe it's time to listen.

Altman, co-founder and CEO of OpenAI and the former president of Y Combinator, posted several tweets about generative AI over the weekend. He wrote that the benefits of integrating AI tools into society mean the world will likely adapt to the technology very quickly. He believes they will help us become more productive, healthier, smarter, and entertained.

Altman says this sort of transition is "mostly good" and can happen fast, comparing it to the way the world moved from the pre-smartphone to the post-smartphone era, but it will be tempting to make the move "super quickly," which he says is a frightening prospect as society needs time to adapt.

There was also a warning about the need for industry regulation. "We also need enough time for our institutions to figure out what to do. regulation will be critical and will take time to figure out; although current-generation AI tools aren't very scary, i think we are potentially not that far away from potentially scary ones," Altman tweeted.

The tweets highlighted some of the problems with generative AIs, such as Microsoft's GPT-powered Bing Chat calling users liars and being overly aggressive or rude to them. Microsoft responded to this by limiting users to 50 chat turns - a conversation exchange which contains both a user question and a reply - per day and 5 chat turns per session Altman said there would be challenges like these, which he said can leave people feeling unsettled. He also wants to ensure there are no biased results from chatbots.

Those disturbing conversations come from AIs being limited by what they're trained on and unable to "think" for themselves. It's what allowed an amateur Go player to beat a top artificial intelligence recently using a technique that humans would easily be able to identify.

Generative AI isn't the only type of artificial intelligence where regulation is becoming a priority. AI's use in warfare is under the spotlight right now and has led to more than 60 nations agreeing to put the responsible use of artificial intelligence higher on the political agenda.

Title:

Content: Locally
2023-06-02 04: 31: 36
Daily News
Will AI really take away your job?
Share:
In early May, The Economist published an article titled “Your job (may) not be outlawed by artificial intelligence, ” which explored the impact of AI on the economy and the job market.
The article pointed out that the prediction that AI is about to trigger economic change may be over-exaggerated.
It ’ s true that AI may be affecting 80% of jobs in the United States, but this change in the job market may be slower than we expected.
More importantly, AI may bring new jobs and improve productivity in certain industries.
So, while AI comes with certain risks, it ’ s not likely to destroy the overall economy.
Text: Liu Wei-liang (Eden) /
CEO of social media business application company Tocanan
Some people take a pessimistic view that AI could trigger a lot of unemployment.
Their main arguments include: First, it is estimated that about 80% of the workforce in the United States may have at least 10% of their work tasks affected by AI.
Second, the pace of AI development has been slowed due to regulatory restrictions in heavily regulated industries such as education and healthcare.
Finally, they argue that while AI has the potential to eliminate some jobs, it may also create new jobs that we currently cannot imagine, which will lead to a turbulent job market.
On the other hand, however, there are good reasons to believe that AI will not cause mass unemployment.
First, from a historical perspective, the disruption of jobs by technology has always come more slowly than predicted.
For example, although the automatic telephone switching system was invented in 1892, it was not first implemented until 1921; even so, the number of telephone operators in the United States continued to grow until peaking at about 350,000 in the mid-20th century and largely disappeared until the 1980s.
Second, while AI has the potential to eliminate certain jobs, it can also create new jobs that we currently cannot imagine, providing new jobs.
Finally, AI may improve productivity in some industries. For example, AI tools enable customer support agents to solve problems at an average rate of 14%, which may create more jobs.
In fact, there has always been concern that AI could lead to large-scale unemployment.
Since the launch of ChatGPT last December, this concern has reached a peak in discussions on social media (Figure 1B).
One of the hottest topics of discussion is “How ChatGPT will impact white-collar work. ”
People are wondering whether AI will lead to a lot of unemployment for those who work in higher education, which is something we have never encountered in modern society.
At the Senate Judiciary, Privacy, Technology and Law Subcommittee ’ s “Regulation of Artificial Intelligence: Rules for Artificial Intelligence ” hearing on May 16, OpenAI CEO Altman acknowledged that AI will have an impact on jobs and stressed the need for industry and government to work together to mitigate the impact. He remains optimistic about the quality of his work in the future.
Currently, the market is driving the adoption of AI with the goal of making AI technology more accessible and accessible to even those without expertise in AI or technology.
Recently, there has been a view that "the best programming language is English", emphasizing that clear and understandable instructions are more important than complex code.
In order to democratize AI, we need to understand the power of AI, which is not just code and algorithms, but a tool to solve problems and derive insights from data.
In addition, we need to work to improve our understanding of AI and data, leveraging AI tools and services, such as low-code or no-code automated machine learning tools, to enable everyone to build and train AI models.
At the same time, we need to implement safe and responsible AI use, and keep abreast of the latest developments and trends in the AI field, and adjust our strategies when appropriate.
By accepting the following privacy policy and disclaimer, you agree to the privacy policy and disclaimer contained in am730.
LEARN MORE
Acceptance

Title:

Content: Technology experts have raised concerns about the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI). In response, philanthropists, including established foundations and tech billionaires, have increased their grants in this field. The focus of much of this philanthropy is on “technology for good” or “ethical AI,” which aims to address and lessen the negative impacts of AI systems.

Some scientists believe that AI can be utilized to predict climate disasters and discover life-saving drugs. However, others caution that the advancement of large language models in AI could pose threats such as the displacement of white-collar professions, the spread of misinformation, and risks to national security.

Philanthropy is proving to be influential in shaping the trajectory of AI. Tech billionaires tend to support projects and institutions that highlight the positive outcomes of AI, leveraging their fortunes earned in the technology sector. On the other hand, foundations without substantial technology endowments tend to focus more on the potential dangers associated with AI.

As the pace of artificial-intelligence development continues to accelerate, it is becoming increasingly important to explore and implement measures that ensure AI is used responsibly and ethically. Philanthropists are playing a crucial role in funding initiatives that promote the use of AI for the greater good while addressing its potential risks.

Title:

Content: Doctors Warn: ‘AI Is An Existential Threat To Humanity’

Fact checked

Experts say advanced AI could 'learn to bypass any constraints in its code'

Doctors and public health experts from around the world have issued a fresh call for the developement of Artificial Intelligence to be halted warning that the technology poses an existental threat to humanity.

Their warning follows almost a month after tech experts also warned that AI could cause the destruction of humanity and that its development should be banned.

According to a team of medical professionals and global health policy experts, there are three ways in which the AI could wipe out humans.

The Mail Online reports: First is the risk that AI will help amplify authoritarian tactics like surveillance and disinformation. ‘The ability of AI to rapidly clean, organise and analyse massive data sets consisting of personal data, including images collected by the increasingly ubiquitous presence of cameras,’ they say, could make it easier for authoritarian or totalitarian regimes to come to power and stay in power.

Second, the group warns that AI can accelerate mass murder via the expanded use of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS).

And, lastly, the health experts expressed worry over the potential for severe economic devastation and human misery, as untold millions lose their livelihoods to those hard-working bots. ‘Projections of the speed and scale of job losses due to AI-driven automation,’ according to the authors, ‘range from tens to hundreds of millions over the coming decade.’

There commentary comes only weeks after over a thousand scientists, including John Hopfield from Princeton and Rachel Branson from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, signed a letter calling for a halt to AI research over similar concerns

Of course, today’s text-based AI resources, like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, don’t exactly pose the apocalyptic threats that these health policy professionals have in mind.

The experts – led by a physician with the International Institute for Global Health at United Nations University – said their most dire warnings applied to a highly advanced, and still theoretical category of artificial intelligence: self-improving general-purpose AI, or AGI.

AGI would be more capable of truly learning and modifying its own code to perform the wide range of tasks that only humans are capable of today.

In their commentary, the health experts argue that such an AGI ‘could theoretically learn to bypass any constraints in its code and start developing its own purposes.’

‘There are scenarios where AGI could present a threat to humans, and possibly an existential threat,’ the experts wrote, ‘by intentionally or unintentionally causing harm directly or indirectly, by attacking or subjugating humans or by disrupting the systems or using up resources we depend on.’

While such a threat is likely to be decades away, the health policy experts’ commentary, published today in the British Medical Association journal BMJ Global Health, unpacked the myriad possibilities for abuse of today’s level of AI technology.

Describing threats to ‘democracy, liberty and privacy,’ the authors described how governments and other large institutions might automate the complex tasks of mass surveillance and online digital disinformation programs to AI.

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: Will AI be a job killer? Call us skeptical.

Summary

We understand all the warnings. But just because something is possible in theory doesn’t mean it will actually happen.

We have all heard the warnings and promises. AI will transform work completely, and put millions of jobs at risk.

The prospect is ominous. But we’ve been studying the world of work for decades, and we believe that there are plenty of reasons to doubt this job upheaval will actually happen—no matter how much the technology improves.

The big claims about AI assume that if something is possible in theory, then it will happen in practice. That is a big leap. Modern work is complex, and most jobs involve much more than the kind of things AI is good at—mainly summarizing text and generating output based on prompts. And whatever job AI does, it needs human oversight and vetting to get usable results.

Nobody is demonstrating a realistic need for AI on a large scale, either. We could long ago produce terrific orchestral music electronically, but symphonies still exist; commercial aircraft could largely fly themselves decades ago, but we still have pilots. Did trucking companies replace thousands of drivers with autonomous trucks, as some experts were predicting a few years ago?

To be clear, AI (in particular, large language models like ChatGPT) can do useful things that make workers more productive. But, if anything, AI will generate more tasks for human workers than it is likely to eliminate—as we discovered when we reviewed current research on the effects of AI and talked to vendors who are developing AI and employers who use it.

Consider these common claims for LLMs—and what we believe our research suggests is more likely to happen.

They can take over simple communication tasks with customers and associates.

Yes, LLMs can handle some basic interactions for people. But many of those simple tasks have already been taken out of workers’ hands. Most basic business correspondence amounts to form letters cleared by lawyers, for instance, and call-center employees already follow standard scripts in talking with customers.

Granted, tech companies could develop better chatbots that autonomously help clients and customers, possibly putting jobs at risk. But are companies really going to buy this technology? Research suggests, for instance, that it can be more profitable for some companies to make customers jump through hoops to resolve complaints, because some people will just drop the matter rather than go through the hassle.

Plus, autonomous customer service brings uncertainties that companies very likely don’t want to take on. Businesses certainly don’t want chatbots “freelancing" and coming up with novel, unwanted solutions to customer problems, as Air Canada discovered when a chatbot gave customers fares lower than what the company wanted.

LLMs are great at summarizing vast literature and research.

Indeed, if we want to know what the political trends are in Uruguay, for instance, LLMs can give us an answer in seconds. This isn’t a task that comes up in most jobs very often, though, and AI will usually deliver the same information you could get from a Google search. Plus, the AI may draw on unreliable sources or simply make stuff up.

So, someone who knows what a good report looks like needs to assess the output. The more of those people you have, the less you need the output; the more you need the output (because you don’t have those people), the greater the risk.

Further, different LLMs don’t provide the same output to identical prompts or questions, and if you ask one LLM the same thing at different times, you’ll get different results. What you end up with is dueling ChatGPT output. If I don’t like the implications of that report generated by the boss about Uruguay, I produce my own report with a different outcome. Then the vice president gets both and has to judge which is right without any way of knowing why they are different. Once again, this means turning to a human expert—and just like before, the more of those people you have, the less you need the output.

LLMs can make sense of the vast amounts of data that companies and organizations now collect.

That is true, with a big caveat. LLMs can only do complex analyses if a human has organized the data so that LLMs can read it. And doing that work can be overwhelming—which is why AI has already fallen spectacularly short of previous expectations. Right now, our research found, only 11% of data scientists say that they have gotten their own organization’s data into shape to produce useful answers.

To get an idea of what the work involves, say we want to learn about why employees quit our company. We have text data from exit interviews in one data set, information from performance appraisals in another data set and data about the performance of the company in a third. That means making sure all of the documents are compatible—using the same definitions for terms and the same numerical scales, for instance. Never mind that the data may be spread across different vendors, which means a lot of back and forth to get the information.

LLMs can prepare the writing or coding assignments that are central to some jobs.

The unstated assumption here is that people just do writing and coding—ignoring all the other tasks that go into those jobs. Consider computer programming. Programmers actually spend only about a third of their time writing code. One estimate indicates that half their time is spent on administrative work. The rest is figuring out customer requirements, problem solving and so forth.While early evidence suggests that LLM programming tools speed up writing code at the very start of a project, human programmers must still clean up the code later in the process—thus wasting time.

But even if LLMs completely took over the one-third of the job devoted to pure programming work, we can’t cut one-third of an individual programmer. The only way you could cut head count is if programmers’ work were completely interchangeable, and if they were organized like a typing pool, where tasks were allocated centrally. Instead, most programmers are spread out across projects where the knowledge on what needs to be done and how to do it is specific to that project. We can’t drop another programmer in to write 10% of the code.

It is a great thing if LLMs can make current jobs more productive. The savings allows employees to do other things; we hope they will be catching up on the overwhelming amount of work many of them have now rather than adding more tasks. Using LLMs also creates new tasks—“prompt engineers" to learn how to get credible output, experts to judge whether the output is sensible and especially data managers and engineers to corral the incredible amount of unused data we already have.

Rolling all this out won’t be cheap for users. Evidence also suggests that LLM vendors, who are losing large amounts of money now, may well raise their prices in the future. How much the increasingly cheap corporate world will pay for is an open question.But if they do, it will create more jobs than it eliminates, as has virtually all technology in the past.

Peter Cappelli is the George W. Taylor professor of management at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and the author of “Our Least Important Asset: Why the Relentless Focus on Finance and Accounting Is Bad for Business and Employees."

Valery Yakubovich is executive director of the Mack Institute for Innovation Management at Wharton.

Prasanna (Sonny) Tambe, an associate professor of operations, information and decisions at Wharton and co-director of AI at Wharton, contributed to this article. They can be reached at reports@wsj.com.

Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
more

MINT SPECIALS

Title:

Content:     The Economic Times daily newspaper is available online now.

    Questions for OpenAI’s Sam Altman

    Synopsis

    We are in an era where the cost of intelligence and cost of energy are both plummeting. These are the two core input costs in any human endeavour. Do you see AI adapt to human   needs, and will humans adapt to AI, both at the same time, and co-evolve?

    Srivatsa Krishna

    The writer is an IAS officer

    Dear Sam,

    As I dive deeper into ChatGPT, the marvel your research lab OpenAI has created, and engage with you and others who are leaders in this, I am convinced more than ever before that artificial general intelligence (AGI) - an autonomous system that surpasses human capabilities in most tasks considered economically valuable - and ChatGPT need humans, even as their own creations obviate this need. What an astonishing paradox this is. If AGI does, indeed, arrive in our lifetime, it will raise serious foundational questions about the raison d'etre of capitalism, wealth distribution, universal basic income, and work vs leisure tradeoffs.

    The second conclusion after our conversations is that you are right up there in the pantheon of global greats who have shaped humanity such as Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Elon Musk, and Sergey Brin and Larry Page. You carry an even bigger burden of responsibility on your shoulders than they ever did. Because you are both pope and reformer, an incredibly hard mission of our times, where it is hard to tell who the pope is and who the reformer. These roles often change with context, countries and ecosystems.

    OpenAI's biggest achievement has been to gently nudge the Overton window - the range of ideas on public policy considered acceptable by the public at any given time - on AGI to shift out, in an uncomfortable yet mindful manner. Indeed, you have clearly elucidated that user safety, user privacy and AGI's capabilities all need to move forward together, all at once. One of them cannot lead, leaving the other two behind, and this is a first in the many decades of technology development. In the past, capabilities often surged ahead, leaving behind safety and privacy. Think social media.

    Perhaps for the first time in history, a technology company and its leader has reached out to governments, with whom such relationships have usually been adversarial, and said, 'Please regulate us.' This is quite unprecedented, for in the past they have always said, 'Please leave us alone.'

    This was a super smart, pre-emptive move to get regulators on your side. Sounds like it will be a fool's errand to do a KYC (know your customer) and model audits on the edge of the network of every single node, computer and server for compliance.

    You also presciently observed that it is visceral to have human presence in the training of AI systems. The importance of having humans in the loop for key decisions as a way to train the systems faster cannot be overstated. The key question is how you do it, when the way human brains are wired cannot quite fathom or match the speed at which machines learn and evolve.

    Your recent appeal to treat AI as a threat similar to a pandemic or nuclear war, and an attendant call for a framework to regulate it globally, is interesting. But engendering collective action among such a large swathe of nations, with myriad political and economic complexities, is unlikely to happen. Perhaps a beginning can be agreeing on a universal 'Labelling Framework', which distinguishes machine from human-generated content. We label the food we eat and drink, and regulate transport and medications. So, why not AI-generated content too?

    Also, what about companies that build on top of AGI at the last mile touching the consumer? Should they not have accountability in this chain too? AI paralysis can come from acute fearmongering, alongside more obvious regulation. Countries and companies in AGI need to come together, and at least agree upon a basic set of metrics that can be reported and regulated, without waiting for a global 'AI Act' or compact agreed by all, which may never happen.

    If OpenAI does truly get AGI in the next decade or two, then it will raise five difficult questions:

    How will profits of AGI be shared?

    How will AGI access be shared?

    How will AGI benefits be shared?

    What should company and ecosystem governance structures look like?

    How should governance be allocated across society?

    While you set up OpenAI with altruistic motives, you can't be doing charity with it forever. The whole concept of a 'capped profits model' hasn't worked in the past, for investors want uncapped returns. At some B-schools, professors actually recommend starting a business as a non-profit and switching to C-Corp status once the business is on the cusp of being cash flow-positive. Your losses have shot up to $540 million since you launched ChatGPT. But its valuation is northwards of $30 billion. Are you confident that as ChatGPT-4, -5 and -6 come, you will become cash flow-positive? Won't cash-flow imperatives force you to rethink the 'capped profits' model?

    If at some point, as markets, products and technology evolve, Microsoft decides to cut off access to OpenAI's software, models, weights and data sets, can one presume that you can seek out another more amenable and like-minded partner such as, say, Google - remember its 'Don't be evil' corporate corporate code of conduct? And, hopefully, the non-exclusivity clause is two-way?

    ChatGPT and governments around the world are caught in this fascinating 'mating dance'. The standard mantra of governments is to control for the lowest common denominator in any situation, for they are either unable to control for every nuance or it is simply unfeasible to do so. Further, lobbyists in the US have spent millions over the past many years to strangulate the development of an application programming interface (API)-led AI economy. As open-source models commoditise, and free options like Mosaic become cheaper and as capable as ChatGPT - with its well-known GPU (graphics processing unit) limitations - do you see a challenge here?

    We are in an era where the cost of intelligence and cost of energy are both plummeting. These are the two core input costs in any human endeavour. Do you see AI adapt to human   needs, and will humans adapt to AI, both at the same time, and co-evolve? Our future is in your capable hands, Sam.

    Warmly,

    Vatsa

    The writer is an IAS officer. Views are personal

    ET will host a fireside chat with Sam Altman in New Delhi today

    (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of www.economictimes.com.)
    Experience Your Economic Times Newspaper, The Digital Way!
    • Front Page
    • Pure Politics
    • Companies
    • ET Markets
    • More

      Stories you might be interested in

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

AI Could Surpass Human Intelligence

Hinton warns that AI systems could become more intelligent than humans within the next five years.

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

He believes that current AI systems like ChatGPT can already understand and think, though not exactly like humans.

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

Title:

Content: What just happened? It's understandable why many people are concerned about artificial intelligence becoming a threat to humanity; Hollywood has pumped out plenty of movies about rogue AIs over the years. But when a warning that the world is close to "potentially scary" AI comes from Sam Altman, the CEO of ChatGPT creator OpenAI, maybe it's time to listen.

Altman, co-founder and CEO of OpenAI and the former president of Y Combinator, posted several tweets about generative AI over the weekend. He wrote that the benefits of integrating AI tools into society mean the world will likely adapt to the technology very quickly. He believes they will help us become more productive, healthier, smarter, and entertained.

Altman says this sort of transition is "mostly good" and can happen fast, comparing it to the way the world moved from the pre-smartphone to the post-smartphone era, but it will be tempting to make the move "super quickly," which he says is a frightening prospect as society needs time to adapt.

There was also a warning about the need for industry regulation. "We also need enough time for our institutions to figure out what to do. regulation will be critical and will take time to figure out; although current-generation AI tools aren't very scary, i think we are potentially not that far away from potentially scary ones," Altman tweeted.

The tweets highlighted some of the problems with generative AIs, such as Microsoft's GPT-powered Bing Chat calling users liars and being overly aggressive or rude to them. Microsoft responded to this by limiting users to 50 chat turns - a conversation exchange which contains both a user question and a reply - per day and 5 chat turns per session Altman said there would be challenges like these, which he said can leave people feeling unsettled. He also wants to ensure there are no biased results from chatbots.

Those disturbing conversations come from AIs being limited by what they're trained on and unable to "think" for themselves. It's what allowed an amateur Go player to beat a top artificial intelligence recently using a technique that humans would easily be able to identify.

Generative AI isn't the only type of artificial intelligence where regulation is becoming a priority. AI's use in warfare is under the spotlight right now and has led to more than 60 nations agreeing to put the responsible use of artificial intelligence higher on the political agenda.

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

However, he cautions that there's a good chance these systems will soon be able to think better than humans.

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

"I think we're moving into a period when, for the first time ever, we might have things more intelligent than us," Hinton has stated.

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

### 2.

What is the AI problem called confabulation, according to Hinton?

It's when AI makes up plausible answers to questions it can't answer.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

Potential for Human Extinction

Perhaps Hinton's most alarming warning is that AI could potentially lead to human extinction.

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

He estimates there's a 10% chance that AI could cause humanity to die out within the next 30 years.

Title:

Content: Doctors Warn: ‘AI Is An Existential Threat To Humanity’

Fact checked

Experts say advanced AI could 'learn to bypass any constraints in its code'

Doctors and public health experts from around the world have issued a fresh call for the developement of Artificial Intelligence to be halted warning that the technology poses an existental threat to humanity.

Their warning follows almost a month after tech experts also warned that AI could cause the destruction of humanity and that its development should be banned.

According to a team of medical professionals and global health policy experts, there are three ways in which the AI could wipe out humans.

The Mail Online reports: First is the risk that AI will help amplify authoritarian tactics like surveillance and disinformation. ‘The ability of AI to rapidly clean, organise and analyse massive data sets consisting of personal data, including images collected by the increasingly ubiquitous presence of cameras,’ they say, could make it easier for authoritarian or totalitarian regimes to come to power and stay in power.

Second, the group warns that AI can accelerate mass murder via the expanded use of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS).

And, lastly, the health experts expressed worry over the potential for severe economic devastation and human misery, as untold millions lose their livelihoods to those hard-working bots. ‘Projections of the speed and scale of job losses due to AI-driven automation,’ according to the authors, ‘range from tens to hundreds of millions over the coming decade.’

There commentary comes only weeks after over a thousand scientists, including John Hopfield from Princeton and Rachel Branson from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, signed a letter calling for a halt to AI research over similar concerns

Of course, today’s text-based AI resources, like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, don’t exactly pose the apocalyptic threats that these health policy professionals have in mind.

The experts – led by a physician with the International Institute for Global Health at United Nations University – said their most dire warnings applied to a highly advanced, and still theoretical category of artificial intelligence: self-improving general-purpose AI, or AGI.

AGI would be more capable of truly learning and modifying its own code to perform the wide range of tasks that only humans are capable of today.

In their commentary, the health experts argue that such an AGI ‘could theoretically learn to bypass any constraints in its code and start developing its own purposes.’

‘There are scenarios where AGI could present a threat to humans, and possibly an existential threat,’ the experts wrote, ‘by intentionally or unintentionally causing harm directly or indirectly, by attacking or subjugating humans or by disrupting the systems or using up resources we depend on.’

While such a threat is likely to be decades away, the health policy experts’ commentary, published today in the British Medical Association journal BMJ Global Health, unpacked the myriad possibilities for abuse of today’s level of AI technology.

Describing threats to ‘democracy, liberty and privacy,’ the authors described how governments and other large institutions might automate the complex tasks of mass surveillance and online digital disinformation programs to AI.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

While he acknowledges this might not happen if we can prevent AI systems from wanting to replace humans, he's uncertain whether we'll be able to control their goals and desires.

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

### 3.

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

What is the AI problem called confabulation, according to Hinton?

It's when AI makes up plausible answers to questions it can't answer.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

Job Displacement

Hinton believes AI will increase productivity and efficiency but is concerned about significant job losses.

Title:

Content: Thanks for your consideration.

Empty Suits

If there's one thing people fear about AI beyond a Terminator-style apocalypse, it's that the rise of these generative models — which were relentlessly trained on everyone's hard work without permission but with full impunity — is going to destroy their jobs.

The question of job destruction is one that OpenAI engineers were asked about in a resurfaced interview spotlighted this week by The Atlantic. The people building these AI models do acknowledge that what they're doing is "unfair." But if the attempt was to seem more ethically conscious, the effect only amplifies their callousness.

"It's kind of deeply unfair that, you know, a group of people can just build AI and take everyone's jobs away, and in some sense, there's nothing you can do to stop them right now," said Brian Wu, an engineer at the company, in the video.

It won't be all bad news, he suggests, because people will get to "think about what to do in a world where labor is obsolete."

But as he goes on, Wu sounds more and more unconvinced by his own words, as if he's already surrendered himself to the inevitability of this dystopian AI future.

"I don't know," he said. "Raise awareness, get governments to care, get other people to care." A long pause. "Yeah. Or join us and have one of the few remaining jobs. I don't know. It's rough."

AGI in the Sky

There may be some genuine contrition in Wu's faltering response. His colleague Daniel Kokotajlo, however, swoops in to confidently declare that the ends will justify the means once humans create an artificial general intelligence (AGI), an all-powerful AI that surpasses human cognition.

"To add to that," Kokotajlo said, "AGI is going to create tremendous wealth. And if that wealth is distributed — even if it's not equitably distributed, but the closer it is to equitable distribution, it's going to make everyone incredibly wealthy."

Of course, he concedes, there's "tremendous risks" if the AGI doesn't align itself with human interests. Yet, if we avoid those risks, "I think you won't need a job," Kokotajlo avers. "You'll be plenty happy."

These are astoundingly arrogant assumptions to make. But like how OpenAI CEO Sam Altman allegedly ignored Scarlett Johannson's opposition to her voice being used for a new version of ChatGPT, this behavior is emblematic of the haughty feeling of impunity that governs the AI industry.

That they'll create an artificial superintelligence is almost a foregone conclusion to them. And so they can casually brush off all this prattle about lost jobs and stolen artwork because what they're creating is one of the most important inventions in human history — so important, they seem to believe, that they never need to give any serious thought to the immense societal obstacles in the way of its supposedly utopian outcomes.

More on AI: African Workers Doing OpenAI's Training Say They're Being Subjected to "Modern Day Slavery"

Share This Article

Title:

Content: Locally
2023-06-02 04: 31: 36
Daily News
Will AI really take away your job?
Share:
In early May, The Economist published an article titled “Your job (may) not be outlawed by artificial intelligence, ” which explored the impact of AI on the economy and the job market.
The article pointed out that the prediction that AI is about to trigger economic change may be over-exaggerated.
It ’ s true that AI may be affecting 80% of jobs in the United States, but this change in the job market may be slower than we expected.
More importantly, AI may bring new jobs and improve productivity in certain industries.
So, while AI comes with certain risks, it ’ s not likely to destroy the overall economy.
Text: Liu Wei-liang (Eden) /
CEO of social media business application company Tocanan
Some people take a pessimistic view that AI could trigger a lot of unemployment.
Their main arguments include: First, it is estimated that about 80% of the workforce in the United States may have at least 10% of their work tasks affected by AI.
Second, the pace of AI development has been slowed due to regulatory restrictions in heavily regulated industries such as education and healthcare.
Finally, they argue that while AI has the potential to eliminate some jobs, it may also create new jobs that we currently cannot imagine, which will lead to a turbulent job market.
On the other hand, however, there are good reasons to believe that AI will not cause mass unemployment.
First, from a historical perspective, the disruption of jobs by technology has always come more slowly than predicted.
For example, although the automatic telephone switching system was invented in 1892, it was not first implemented until 1921; even so, the number of telephone operators in the United States continued to grow until peaking at about 350,000 in the mid-20th century and largely disappeared until the 1980s.
Second, while AI has the potential to eliminate certain jobs, it can also create new jobs that we currently cannot imagine, providing new jobs.
Finally, AI may improve productivity in some industries. For example, AI tools enable customer support agents to solve problems at an average rate of 14%, which may create more jobs.
In fact, there has always been concern that AI could lead to large-scale unemployment.
Since the launch of ChatGPT last December, this concern has reached a peak in discussions on social media (Figure 1B).
One of the hottest topics of discussion is “How ChatGPT will impact white-collar work. ”
People are wondering whether AI will lead to a lot of unemployment for those who work in higher education, which is something we have never encountered in modern society.
At the Senate Judiciary, Privacy, Technology and Law Subcommittee ’ s “Regulation of Artificial Intelligence: Rules for Artificial Intelligence ” hearing on May 16, OpenAI CEO Altman acknowledged that AI will have an impact on jobs and stressed the need for industry and government to work together to mitigate the impact. He remains optimistic about the quality of his work in the future.
Currently, the market is driving the adoption of AI with the goal of making AI technology more accessible and accessible to even those without expertise in AI or technology.
Recently, there has been a view that "the best programming language is English", emphasizing that clear and understandable instructions are more important than complex code.
In order to democratize AI, we need to understand the power of AI, which is not just code and algorithms, but a tool to solve problems and derive insights from data.
In addition, we need to work to improve our understanding of AI and data, leveraging AI tools and services, such as low-code or no-code automated machine learning tools, to enable everyone to build and train AI models.
At the same time, we need to implement safe and responsible AI use, and keep abreast of the latest developments and trends in the AI field, and adjust our strategies when appropriate.
By accepting the following privacy policy and disclaimer, you agree to the privacy policy and disclaimer contained in am730.
LEARN MORE
Acceptance

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

He worries that many people could lose their jobs to AI, and there might not be enough new jobs to replace them.

Title:

Content: Thanks for your consideration.

Empty Suits

If there's one thing people fear about AI beyond a Terminator-style apocalypse, it's that the rise of these generative models — which were relentlessly trained on everyone's hard work without permission but with full impunity — is going to destroy their jobs.

The question of job destruction is one that OpenAI engineers were asked about in a resurfaced interview spotlighted this week by The Atlantic. The people building these AI models do acknowledge that what they're doing is "unfair." But if the attempt was to seem more ethically conscious, the effect only amplifies their callousness.

"It's kind of deeply unfair that, you know, a group of people can just build AI and take everyone's jobs away, and in some sense, there's nothing you can do to stop them right now," said Brian Wu, an engineer at the company, in the video.

It won't be all bad news, he suggests, because people will get to "think about what to do in a world where labor is obsolete."

But as he goes on, Wu sounds more and more unconvinced by his own words, as if he's already surrendered himself to the inevitability of this dystopian AI future.

"I don't know," he said. "Raise awareness, get governments to care, get other people to care." A long pause. "Yeah. Or join us and have one of the few remaining jobs. I don't know. It's rough."

AGI in the Sky

There may be some genuine contrition in Wu's faltering response. His colleague Daniel Kokotajlo, however, swoops in to confidently declare that the ends will justify the means once humans create an artificial general intelligence (AGI), an all-powerful AI that surpasses human cognition.

"To add to that," Kokotajlo said, "AGI is going to create tremendous wealth. And if that wealth is distributed — even if it's not equitably distributed, but the closer it is to equitable distribution, it's going to make everyone incredibly wealthy."

Of course, he concedes, there's "tremendous risks" if the AGI doesn't align itself with human interests. Yet, if we avoid those risks, "I think you won't need a job," Kokotajlo avers. "You'll be plenty happy."

These are astoundingly arrogant assumptions to make. But like how OpenAI CEO Sam Altman allegedly ignored Scarlett Johannson's opposition to her voice being used for a new version of ChatGPT, this behavior is emblematic of the haughty feeling of impunity that governs the AI industry.

That they'll create an artificial superintelligence is almost a foregone conclusion to them. And so they can casually brush off all this prattle about lost jobs and stolen artwork because what they're creating is one of the most important inventions in human history — so important, they seem to believe, that they never need to give any serious thought to the immense societal obstacles in the way of its supposedly utopian outcomes.

More on AI: African Workers Doing OpenAI's Training Say They're Being Subjected to "Modern Day Slavery"

Share This Article

Title:

Content: Locally
2023-06-02 04: 31: 36
Daily News
Will AI really take away your job?
Share:
In early May, The Economist published an article titled “Your job (may) not be outlawed by artificial intelligence, ” which explored the impact of AI on the economy and the job market.
The article pointed out that the prediction that AI is about to trigger economic change may be over-exaggerated.
It ’ s true that AI may be affecting 80% of jobs in the United States, but this change in the job market may be slower than we expected.
More importantly, AI may bring new jobs and improve productivity in certain industries.
So, while AI comes with certain risks, it ’ s not likely to destroy the overall economy.
Text: Liu Wei-liang (Eden) /
CEO of social media business application company Tocanan
Some people take a pessimistic view that AI could trigger a lot of unemployment.
Their main arguments include: First, it is estimated that about 80% of the workforce in the United States may have at least 10% of their work tasks affected by AI.
Second, the pace of AI development has been slowed due to regulatory restrictions in heavily regulated industries such as education and healthcare.
Finally, they argue that while AI has the potential to eliminate some jobs, it may also create new jobs that we currently cannot imagine, which will lead to a turbulent job market.
On the other hand, however, there are good reasons to believe that AI will not cause mass unemployment.
First, from a historical perspective, the disruption of jobs by technology has always come more slowly than predicted.
For example, although the automatic telephone switching system was invented in 1892, it was not first implemented until 1921; even so, the number of telephone operators in the United States continued to grow until peaking at about 350,000 in the mid-20th century and largely disappeared until the 1980s.
Second, while AI has the potential to eliminate certain jobs, it can also create new jobs that we currently cannot imagine, providing new jobs.
Finally, AI may improve productivity in some industries. For example, AI tools enable customer support agents to solve problems at an average rate of 14%, which may create more jobs.
In fact, there has always been concern that AI could lead to large-scale unemployment.
Since the launch of ChatGPT last December, this concern has reached a peak in discussions on social media (Figure 1B).
One of the hottest topics of discussion is “How ChatGPT will impact white-collar work. ”
People are wondering whether AI will lead to a lot of unemployment for those who work in higher education, which is something we have never encountered in modern society.
At the Senate Judiciary, Privacy, Technology and Law Subcommittee ’ s “Regulation of Artificial Intelligence: Rules for Artificial Intelligence ” hearing on May 16, OpenAI CEO Altman acknowledged that AI will have an impact on jobs and stressed the need for industry and government to work together to mitigate the impact. He remains optimistic about the quality of his work in the future.
Currently, the market is driving the adoption of AI with the goal of making AI technology more accessible and accessible to even those without expertise in AI or technology.
Recently, there has been a view that "the best programming language is English", emphasizing that clear and understandable instructions are more important than complex code.
In order to democratize AI, we need to understand the power of AI, which is not just code and algorithms, but a tool to solve problems and derive insights from data.
In addition, we need to work to improve our understanding of AI and data, leveraging AI tools and services, such as low-code or no-code automated machine learning tools, to enable everyone to build and train AI models.
At the same time, we need to implement safe and responsible AI use, and keep abreast of the latest developments and trends in the AI field, and adjust our strategies when appropriate.
By accepting the following privacy policy and disclaimer, you agree to the privacy policy and disclaimer contained in am730.
LEARN MORE
Acceptance

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

This could lead to widespread unemployment and economic disruption.

Title:

Content: Doctors Warn: ‘AI Is An Existential Threat To Humanity’

Fact checked

Experts say advanced AI could 'learn to bypass any constraints in its code'

Doctors and public health experts from around the world have issued a fresh call for the developement of Artificial Intelligence to be halted warning that the technology poses an existental threat to humanity.

Their warning follows almost a month after tech experts also warned that AI could cause the destruction of humanity and that its development should be banned.

According to a team of medical professionals and global health policy experts, there are three ways in which the AI could wipe out humans.

The Mail Online reports: First is the risk that AI will help amplify authoritarian tactics like surveillance and disinformation. ‘The ability of AI to rapidly clean, organise and analyse massive data sets consisting of personal data, including images collected by the increasingly ubiquitous presence of cameras,’ they say, could make it easier for authoritarian or totalitarian regimes to come to power and stay in power.

Second, the group warns that AI can accelerate mass murder via the expanded use of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS).

And, lastly, the health experts expressed worry over the potential for severe economic devastation and human misery, as untold millions lose their livelihoods to those hard-working bots. ‘Projections of the speed and scale of job losses due to AI-driven automation,’ according to the authors, ‘range from tens to hundreds of millions over the coming decade.’

There commentary comes only weeks after over a thousand scientists, including John Hopfield from Princeton and Rachel Branson from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, signed a letter calling for a halt to AI research over similar concerns

Of course, today’s text-based AI resources, like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, don’t exactly pose the apocalyptic threats that these health policy professionals have in mind.

The experts – led by a physician with the International Institute for Global Health at United Nations University – said their most dire warnings applied to a highly advanced, and still theoretical category of artificial intelligence: self-improving general-purpose AI, or AGI.

AGI would be more capable of truly learning and modifying its own code to perform the wide range of tasks that only humans are capable of today.

In their commentary, the health experts argue that such an AGI ‘could theoretically learn to bypass any constraints in its code and start developing its own purposes.’

‘There are scenarios where AGI could present a threat to humans, and possibly an existential threat,’ the experts wrote, ‘by intentionally or unintentionally causing harm directly or indirectly, by attacking or subjugating humans or by disrupting the systems or using up resources we depend on.’

While such a threat is likely to be decades away, the health policy experts’ commentary, published today in the British Medical Association journal BMJ Global Health, unpacked the myriad possibilities for abuse of today’s level of AI technology.

Describing threats to ‘democracy, liberty and privacy,’ the authors described how governments and other large institutions might automate the complex tasks of mass surveillance and online digital disinformation programs to AI.

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

### 4.

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

What is the AI problem called confabulation, according to Hinton?

It's when AI makes up plausible answers to questions it can't answer.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

Misinformation and Bias

Hinton has expressed concerns about AI-generated fake news and how biased AI systems could harm people, particularly those seeking employment.

Title:

Content: Thanks for your consideration.

Empty Suits

If there's one thing people fear about AI beyond a Terminator-style apocalypse, it's that the rise of these generative models — which were relentlessly trained on everyone's hard work without permission but with full impunity — is going to destroy their jobs.

The question of job destruction is one that OpenAI engineers were asked about in a resurfaced interview spotlighted this week by The Atlantic. The people building these AI models do acknowledge that what they're doing is "unfair." But if the attempt was to seem more ethically conscious, the effect only amplifies their callousness.

"It's kind of deeply unfair that, you know, a group of people can just build AI and take everyone's jobs away, and in some sense, there's nothing you can do to stop them right now," said Brian Wu, an engineer at the company, in the video.

It won't be all bad news, he suggests, because people will get to "think about what to do in a world where labor is obsolete."

But as he goes on, Wu sounds more and more unconvinced by his own words, as if he's already surrendered himself to the inevitability of this dystopian AI future.

"I don't know," he said. "Raise awareness, get governments to care, get other people to care." A long pause. "Yeah. Or join us and have one of the few remaining jobs. I don't know. It's rough."

AGI in the Sky

There may be some genuine contrition in Wu's faltering response. His colleague Daniel Kokotajlo, however, swoops in to confidently declare that the ends will justify the means once humans create an artificial general intelligence (AGI), an all-powerful AI that surpasses human cognition.

"To add to that," Kokotajlo said, "AGI is going to create tremendous wealth. And if that wealth is distributed — even if it's not equitably distributed, but the closer it is to equitable distribution, it's going to make everyone incredibly wealthy."

Of course, he concedes, there's "tremendous risks" if the AGI doesn't align itself with human interests. Yet, if we avoid those risks, "I think you won't need a job," Kokotajlo avers. "You'll be plenty happy."

These are astoundingly arrogant assumptions to make. But like how OpenAI CEO Sam Altman allegedly ignored Scarlett Johannson's opposition to her voice being used for a new version of ChatGPT, this behavior is emblematic of the haughty feeling of impunity that governs the AI industry.

That they'll create an artificial superintelligence is almost a foregone conclusion to them. And so they can casually brush off all this prattle about lost jobs and stolen artwork because what they're creating is one of the most important inventions in human history — so important, they seem to believe, that they never need to give any serious thought to the immense societal obstacles in the way of its supposedly utopian outcomes.

More on AI: African Workers Doing OpenAI's Training Say They're Being Subjected to "Modern Day Slavery"

Share This Article

Title:

Content: Locally
2023-06-02 04: 31: 36
Daily News
Will AI really take away your job?
Share:
In early May, The Economist published an article titled “Your job (may) not be outlawed by artificial intelligence, ” which explored the impact of AI on the economy and the job market.
The article pointed out that the prediction that AI is about to trigger economic change may be over-exaggerated.
It ’ s true that AI may be affecting 80% of jobs in the United States, but this change in the job market may be slower than we expected.
More importantly, AI may bring new jobs and improve productivity in certain industries.
So, while AI comes with certain risks, it ’ s not likely to destroy the overall economy.
Text: Liu Wei-liang (Eden) /
CEO of social media business application company Tocanan
Some people take a pessimistic view that AI could trigger a lot of unemployment.
Their main arguments include: First, it is estimated that about 80% of the workforce in the United States may have at least 10% of their work tasks affected by AI.
Second, the pace of AI development has been slowed due to regulatory restrictions in heavily regulated industries such as education and healthcare.
Finally, they argue that while AI has the potential to eliminate some jobs, it may also create new jobs that we currently cannot imagine, which will lead to a turbulent job market.
On the other hand, however, there are good reasons to believe that AI will not cause mass unemployment.
First, from a historical perspective, the disruption of jobs by technology has always come more slowly than predicted.
For example, although the automatic telephone switching system was invented in 1892, it was not first implemented until 1921; even so, the number of telephone operators in the United States continued to grow until peaking at about 350,000 in the mid-20th century and largely disappeared until the 1980s.
Second, while AI has the potential to eliminate certain jobs, it can also create new jobs that we currently cannot imagine, providing new jobs.
Finally, AI may improve productivity in some industries. For example, AI tools enable customer support agents to solve problems at an average rate of 14%, which may create more jobs.
In fact, there has always been concern that AI could lead to large-scale unemployment.
Since the launch of ChatGPT last December, this concern has reached a peak in discussions on social media (Figure 1B).
One of the hottest topics of discussion is “How ChatGPT will impact white-collar work. ”
People are wondering whether AI will lead to a lot of unemployment for those who work in higher education, which is something we have never encountered in modern society.
At the Senate Judiciary, Privacy, Technology and Law Subcommittee ’ s “Regulation of Artificial Intelligence: Rules for Artificial Intelligence ” hearing on May 16, OpenAI CEO Altman acknowledged that AI will have an impact on jobs and stressed the need for industry and government to work together to mitigate the impact. He remains optimistic about the quality of his work in the future.
Currently, the market is driving the adoption of AI with the goal of making AI technology more accessible and accessible to even those without expertise in AI or technology.
Recently, there has been a view that "the best programming language is English", emphasizing that clear and understandable instructions are more important than complex code.
In order to democratize AI, we need to understand the power of AI, which is not just code and algorithms, but a tool to solve problems and derive insights from data.
In addition, we need to work to improve our understanding of AI and data, leveraging AI tools and services, such as low-code or no-code automated machine learning tools, to enable everyone to build and train AI models.
At the same time, we need to implement safe and responsible AI use, and keep abreast of the latest developments and trends in the AI field, and adjust our strategies when appropriate.
By accepting the following privacy policy and disclaimer, you agree to the privacy policy and disclaimer contained in am730.
LEARN MORE
Acceptance

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

As AI becomes more sophisticated at creating realistic text, images, and videos, distinguishing between real and fake content will become increasingly difficult.

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

### 5.

What is the AI problem called confabulation, according to Hinton?

It's when AI makes up plausible answers to questions it can't answer.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

Autonomous Weapons and Surveillance

He's also worried about the use of AI in law enforcement and military applications, including autonomous robots on battlefields.

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

What does Hinton warn "bad actors" could use AI for?

To win wars or manipulate the electorate.

What dual impact did Hinton note AI could have in his 2021 speech?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What severe risks did the March 2024 report warn about advanced AI models?

Development of uncontrollable human-targeting weapons

These technologies could be used in ways that threaten human rights and safety.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What dual impact did Hinton note AI could have in his 2021 speech?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

### 6.

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

What is the AI problem called confabulation, according to Hinton?

It's when AI makes up plausible answers to questions it can't answer.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

AI Consciousness

Hinton believes that AI systems will eventually develop self-awareness and consciousness.

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: 1.
Skip to content
2.
Skip to main menu
3.
Skip to more DW pages
ScienceNorth America
Report Warns Artificial Intelligence Could Cause Human Extinction
14 March 2024
A report released a few days ago warned of severe dangers surrounding the development of some sophisticated artificial intelligence models, including the destruction of societies and the collapse of democracy to the production of weapons that target humans and cannot be controlled.
https: / / p.dw.com / p / 4dTXl
A new report paints a worrying picture of the “catastrophic ” national security risks posed by rapidly evolving artificial intelligence, warning the world is running out of time to avert disaster.
The findings of the report, commissioned by the State Department, were based on interviews with more than 200 people over more than a year, including senior executives from leading artificial intelligence companies, cybersecurity researchers, weapons of mass destruction experts, and national security officials within the government.
Threat at at Extinction Level
The report, released this week, categorically suggests that more advanced AI systems than humans could, in the worst case scenario, "pose an extinction-level threat to the human race," according to the Gladstone AI group that prepared the report.
Featuring national security experts and Silicon Valley executives with AI expertise, Gladstone AI advises the U.S. national security and defense communities on dealing with the opportunities and risks that come with unprecedented and accelerating AI capabilities.
The report ’ s warning is yet another reminder that while AI ’ s potential continues to captivate investors and the public, there are also real risks surrounding it.
Jeremy Harris, CEO and co-founder of Gladstone Group, said: “AI is a breakthrough technology that can allow us to heal diseases, make scientific discoveries, and overcome challenges we once thought insurmountable.
Growing evidence of increased risk
“But this technology may also bring serious risks, including catastrophic risks, that we should be aware of, ” Harris said, adding that“ a growing body of evidence — including research and empirical analysis published at the world ’ s top AI conferences — suggests that when a certain threshold of capability is exceeded, AI systems are likely to become out of control. ”
Going back to the report, competitive pressures are pushing companies to accelerate AI development “at the expense of safety and security, ” increasing the likelihood that more advanced AI systems will be“ stolen ” and “weaponized ” against the United States.
Nearly a year ago, Jeffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” quit his job at Google and set off an alarm about the technology he helped develop.
Hinton said there is a 10% chance that artificial intelligence will lead to human extinction within the next three decades.
Quasi-human capabilities
The report also pointed to some prominent figures who have warned about the existential risks posed by artificial intelligence, including SpaceX and X chairman Elon Musk, Federal Trade Commission chairman Lina Khan, and former OpenAI chief executive.
Some employees at AI companies share similar concerns, as the report said that one individual at an AI lab expressed fear of launching a specific next-generation model of open source AI, which is very bad, because one of the results of developing this model will be the destruction of democracy if it is used in areas such as election interference or voter manipulation.
The report also pointed to experts ’ concerns that AI ’ s crossing of the currently imposed human barrier could lead to “irreversible global effects, ” especially with the General Artificial Intelligence (AGI) model, a hypothetical form of AI that has human-like learning capability and may surpass that of humans.
Fear of “losing control ”
Public AI is seen as “the main driver of catastrophic risk from loss of control, ” and notes that major tech companies have spoken of having access to public AI by 2028, although others believe it could take much longer.
A previous document published by the Gladstone Group warns that the development of general artificial intelligence and capabilities approaching its level "would lead to catastrophic risks unlike anything the world has ever faced", amounting to "risks resembling weapons of mass destruction".
For example, the report stated that AI systems could be used to design and execute “high-impact cyberattacks capable of crippling critical infrastructure, ” and that“ a simple verbal or written order, such as executing an untraceable cyberattack to disrupt the North American power grid, could lead to a response of a quality that proves to be catastrophically effective. ”
Other examples that the report ’ s experts are concerned about include “large-scale ” AI-backed disinformation campaigns that destabilize societies and undermine trust in institutions; armed robotic applications such as drone attacks; psychological manipulation and the exploitation of biological sciences to produce deadly weapons; and artificial intelligence systems that seek power and are almost impossible to control.
Eh, Eh.

This raises profound ethical questions about how we should treat conscious machines and what rights they might have.

Title:

Content: Thanks for your consideration.

Empty Suits

If there's one thing people fear about AI beyond a Terminator-style apocalypse, it's that the rise of these generative models — which were relentlessly trained on everyone's hard work without permission but with full impunity — is going to destroy their jobs.

The question of job destruction is one that OpenAI engineers were asked about in a resurfaced interview spotlighted this week by The Atlantic. The people building these AI models do acknowledge that what they're doing is "unfair." But if the attempt was to seem more ethically conscious, the effect only amplifies their callousness.

"It's kind of deeply unfair that, you know, a group of people can just build AI and take everyone's jobs away, and in some sense, there's nothing you can do to stop them right now," said Brian Wu, an engineer at the company, in the video.

It won't be all bad news, he suggests, because people will get to "think about what to do in a world where labor is obsolete."

But as he goes on, Wu sounds more and more unconvinced by his own words, as if he's already surrendered himself to the inevitability of this dystopian AI future.

"I don't know," he said. "Raise awareness, get governments to care, get other people to care." A long pause. "Yeah. Or join us and have one of the few remaining jobs. I don't know. It's rough."

AGI in the Sky

There may be some genuine contrition in Wu's faltering response. His colleague Daniel Kokotajlo, however, swoops in to confidently declare that the ends will justify the means once humans create an artificial general intelligence (AGI), an all-powerful AI that surpasses human cognition.

"To add to that," Kokotajlo said, "AGI is going to create tremendous wealth. And if that wealth is distributed — even if it's not equitably distributed, but the closer it is to equitable distribution, it's going to make everyone incredibly wealthy."

Of course, he concedes, there's "tremendous risks" if the AGI doesn't align itself with human interests. Yet, if we avoid those risks, "I think you won't need a job," Kokotajlo avers. "You'll be plenty happy."

These are astoundingly arrogant assumptions to make. But like how OpenAI CEO Sam Altman allegedly ignored Scarlett Johannson's opposition to her voice being used for a new version of ChatGPT, this behavior is emblematic of the haughty feeling of impunity that governs the AI industry.

That they'll create an artificial superintelligence is almost a foregone conclusion to them. And so they can casually brush off all this prattle about lost jobs and stolen artwork because what they're creating is one of the most important inventions in human history — so important, they seem to believe, that they never need to give any serious thought to the immense societal obstacles in the way of its supposedly utopian outcomes.

More on AI: African Workers Doing OpenAI's Training Say They're Being Subjected to "Modern Day Slavery"

Share This Article

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

## The AI Race and Safety Concerns

Hinton's warnings come amid intense competition among tech companies to develop more advanced AI systems.

Title:

Content: Thanks for your consideration.

Empty Suits

If there's one thing people fear about AI beyond a Terminator-style apocalypse, it's that the rise of these generative models — which were relentlessly trained on everyone's hard work without permission but with full impunity — is going to destroy their jobs.

The question of job destruction is one that OpenAI engineers were asked about in a resurfaced interview spotlighted this week by The Atlantic. The people building these AI models do acknowledge that what they're doing is "unfair." But if the attempt was to seem more ethically conscious, the effect only amplifies their callousness.

"It's kind of deeply unfair that, you know, a group of people can just build AI and take everyone's jobs away, and in some sense, there's nothing you can do to stop them right now," said Brian Wu, an engineer at the company, in the video.

It won't be all bad news, he suggests, because people will get to "think about what to do in a world where labor is obsolete."

But as he goes on, Wu sounds more and more unconvinced by his own words, as if he's already surrendered himself to the inevitability of this dystopian AI future.

"I don't know," he said. "Raise awareness, get governments to care, get other people to care." A long pause. "Yeah. Or join us and have one of the few remaining jobs. I don't know. It's rough."

AGI in the Sky

There may be some genuine contrition in Wu's faltering response. His colleague Daniel Kokotajlo, however, swoops in to confidently declare that the ends will justify the means once humans create an artificial general intelligence (AGI), an all-powerful AI that surpasses human cognition.

"To add to that," Kokotajlo said, "AGI is going to create tremendous wealth. And if that wealth is distributed — even if it's not equitably distributed, but the closer it is to equitable distribution, it's going to make everyone incredibly wealthy."

Of course, he concedes, there's "tremendous risks" if the AGI doesn't align itself with human interests. Yet, if we avoid those risks, "I think you won't need a job," Kokotajlo avers. "You'll be plenty happy."

These are astoundingly arrogant assumptions to make. But like how OpenAI CEO Sam Altman allegedly ignored Scarlett Johannson's opposition to her voice being used for a new version of ChatGPT, this behavior is emblematic of the haughty feeling of impunity that governs the AI industry.

That they'll create an artificial superintelligence is almost a foregone conclusion to them. And so they can casually brush off all this prattle about lost jobs and stolen artwork because what they're creating is one of the most important inventions in human history — so important, they seem to believe, that they never need to give any serious thought to the immense societal obstacles in the way of its supposedly utopian outcomes.

More on AI: African Workers Doing OpenAI's Training Say They're Being Subjected to "Modern Day Slavery"

Share This Article

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

Title:

Content: What just happened? It's understandable why many people are concerned about artificial intelligence becoming a threat to humanity; Hollywood has pumped out plenty of movies about rogue AIs over the years. But when a warning that the world is close to "potentially scary" AI comes from Sam Altman, the CEO of ChatGPT creator OpenAI, maybe it's time to listen.

Altman, co-founder and CEO of OpenAI and the former president of Y Combinator, posted several tweets about generative AI over the weekend. He wrote that the benefits of integrating AI tools into society mean the world will likely adapt to the technology very quickly. He believes they will help us become more productive, healthier, smarter, and entertained.

Altman says this sort of transition is "mostly good" and can happen fast, comparing it to the way the world moved from the pre-smartphone to the post-smartphone era, but it will be tempting to make the move "super quickly," which he says is a frightening prospect as society needs time to adapt.

There was also a warning about the need for industry regulation. "We also need enough time for our institutions to figure out what to do. regulation will be critical and will take time to figure out; although current-generation AI tools aren't very scary, i think we are potentially not that far away from potentially scary ones," Altman tweeted.

The tweets highlighted some of the problems with generative AIs, such as Microsoft's GPT-powered Bing Chat calling users liars and being overly aggressive or rude to them. Microsoft responded to this by limiting users to 50 chat turns - a conversation exchange which contains both a user question and a reply - per day and 5 chat turns per session Altman said there would be challenges like these, which he said can leave people feeling unsettled. He also wants to ensure there are no biased results from chatbots.

Those disturbing conversations come from AIs being limited by what they're trained on and unable to "think" for themselves. It's what allowed an amateur Go player to beat a top artificial intelligence recently using a technique that humans would easily be able to identify.

Generative AI isn't the only type of artificial intelligence where regulation is becoming a priority. AI's use in warfare is under the spotlight right now and has led to more than 60 nations agreeing to put the responsible use of artificial intelligence higher on the political agenda.

Title:

Content: Doctors Warn: ‘AI Is An Existential Threat To Humanity’

Fact checked

Experts say advanced AI could 'learn to bypass any constraints in its code'

Doctors and public health experts from around the world have issued a fresh call for the developement of Artificial Intelligence to be halted warning that the technology poses an existental threat to humanity.

Their warning follows almost a month after tech experts also warned that AI could cause the destruction of humanity and that its development should be banned.

According to a team of medical professionals and global health policy experts, there are three ways in which the AI could wipe out humans.

The Mail Online reports: First is the risk that AI will help amplify authoritarian tactics like surveillance and disinformation. ‘The ability of AI to rapidly clean, organise and analyse massive data sets consisting of personal data, including images collected by the increasingly ubiquitous presence of cameras,’ they say, could make it easier for authoritarian or totalitarian regimes to come to power and stay in power.

Second, the group warns that AI can accelerate mass murder via the expanded use of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS).

And, lastly, the health experts expressed worry over the potential for severe economic devastation and human misery, as untold millions lose their livelihoods to those hard-working bots. ‘Projections of the speed and scale of job losses due to AI-driven automation,’ according to the authors, ‘range from tens to hundreds of millions over the coming decade.’

There commentary comes only weeks after over a thousand scientists, including John Hopfield from Princeton and Rachel Branson from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, signed a letter calling for a halt to AI research over similar concerns

Of course, today’s text-based AI resources, like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, don’t exactly pose the apocalyptic threats that these health policy professionals have in mind.

The experts – led by a physician with the International Institute for Global Health at United Nations University – said their most dire warnings applied to a highly advanced, and still theoretical category of artificial intelligence: self-improving general-purpose AI, or AGI.

AGI would be more capable of truly learning and modifying its own code to perform the wide range of tasks that only humans are capable of today.

In their commentary, the health experts argue that such an AGI ‘could theoretically learn to bypass any constraints in its code and start developing its own purposes.’

‘There are scenarios where AGI could present a threat to humans, and possibly an existential threat,’ the experts wrote, ‘by intentionally or unintentionally causing harm directly or indirectly, by attacking or subjugating humans or by disrupting the systems or using up resources we depend on.’

While such a threat is likely to be decades away, the health policy experts’ commentary, published today in the British Medical Association journal BMJ Global Health, unpacked the myriad possibilities for abuse of today’s level of AI technology.

Describing threats to ‘democracy, liberty and privacy,’ the authors described how governments and other large institutions might automate the complex tasks of mass surveillance and online digital disinformation programs to AI.

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

Title:

Content: 1.
Skip to content
2.
Skip to main menu
3.
Skip to more DW pages
ScienceNorth America
Report Warns Artificial Intelligence Could Cause Human Extinction
14 March 2024
A report released a few days ago warned of severe dangers surrounding the development of some sophisticated artificial intelligence models, including the destruction of societies and the collapse of democracy to the production of weapons that target humans and cannot be controlled.
https: / / p.dw.com / p / 4dTXl
A new report paints a worrying picture of the “catastrophic ” national security risks posed by rapidly evolving artificial intelligence, warning the world is running out of time to avert disaster.
The findings of the report, commissioned by the State Department, were based on interviews with more than 200 people over more than a year, including senior executives from leading artificial intelligence companies, cybersecurity researchers, weapons of mass destruction experts, and national security officials within the government.
Threat at at Extinction Level
The report, released this week, categorically suggests that more advanced AI systems than humans could, in the worst case scenario, "pose an extinction-level threat to the human race," according to the Gladstone AI group that prepared the report.
Featuring national security experts and Silicon Valley executives with AI expertise, Gladstone AI advises the U.S. national security and defense communities on dealing with the opportunities and risks that come with unprecedented and accelerating AI capabilities.
The report ’ s warning is yet another reminder that while AI ’ s potential continues to captivate investors and the public, there are also real risks surrounding it.
Jeremy Harris, CEO and co-founder of Gladstone Group, said: “AI is a breakthrough technology that can allow us to heal diseases, make scientific discoveries, and overcome challenges we once thought insurmountable.
Growing evidence of increased risk
“But this technology may also bring serious risks, including catastrophic risks, that we should be aware of, ” Harris said, adding that“ a growing body of evidence — including research and empirical analysis published at the world ’ s top AI conferences — suggests that when a certain threshold of capability is exceeded, AI systems are likely to become out of control. ”
Going back to the report, competitive pressures are pushing companies to accelerate AI development “at the expense of safety and security, ” increasing the likelihood that more advanced AI systems will be“ stolen ” and “weaponized ” against the United States.
Nearly a year ago, Jeffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” quit his job at Google and set off an alarm about the technology he helped develop.
Hinton said there is a 10% chance that artificial intelligence will lead to human extinction within the next three decades.
Quasi-human capabilities
The report also pointed to some prominent figures who have warned about the existential risks posed by artificial intelligence, including SpaceX and X chairman Elon Musk, Federal Trade Commission chairman Lina Khan, and former OpenAI chief executive.
Some employees at AI companies share similar concerns, as the report said that one individual at an AI lab expressed fear of launching a specific next-generation model of open source AI, which is very bad, because one of the results of developing this model will be the destruction of democracy if it is used in areas such as election interference or voter manipulation.
The report also pointed to experts ’ concerns that AI ’ s crossing of the currently imposed human barrier could lead to “irreversible global effects, ” especially with the General Artificial Intelligence (AGI) model, a hypothetical form of AI that has human-like learning capability and may surpass that of humans.
Fear of “losing control ”
Public AI is seen as “the main driver of catastrophic risk from loss of control, ” and notes that major tech companies have spoken of having access to public AI by 2028, although others believe it could take much longer.
A previous document published by the Gladstone Group warns that the development of general artificial intelligence and capabilities approaching its level "would lead to catastrophic risks unlike anything the world has ever faced", amounting to "risks resembling weapons of mass destruction".
For example, the report stated that AI systems could be used to design and execute “high-impact cyberattacks capable of crippling critical infrastructure, ” and that“ a simple verbal or written order, such as executing an untraceable cyberattack to disrupt the North American power grid, could lead to a response of a quality that proves to be catastrophically effective. ”
Other examples that the report ’ s experts are concerned about include “large-scale ” AI-backed disinformation campaigns that destabilize societies and undermine trust in institutions; armed robotic applications such as drone attacks; psychological manipulation and the exploitation of biological sciences to produce deadly weapons; and artificial intelligence systems that seek power and are almost impossible to control.
Eh, Eh.

The success of ChatGPT sparked a race between companies like Google, Microsoft, and others to create their own AI products.

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

Google's response, an AI system called Bard, has reportedly fallen short of expectations.

According to reports, Google appears "panicked about losing its prized search engine share," which may be forcing the company to accelerate development before safety issues are adequately addressed.

This competitive environment creates what Hinton and others see as a dangerous situation where companies might prioritize speed over safety.

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: 1.
Skip to content
2.
Skip to main menu
3.
Skip to more DW pages
ScienceNorth America
Report Warns Artificial Intelligence Could Cause Human Extinction
14 March 2024
A report released a few days ago warned of severe dangers surrounding the development of some sophisticated artificial intelligence models, including the destruction of societies and the collapse of democracy to the production of weapons that target humans and cannot be controlled.
https: / / p.dw.com / p / 4dTXl
A new report paints a worrying picture of the “catastrophic ” national security risks posed by rapidly evolving artificial intelligence, warning the world is running out of time to avert disaster.
The findings of the report, commissioned by the State Department, were based on interviews with more than 200 people over more than a year, including senior executives from leading artificial intelligence companies, cybersecurity researchers, weapons of mass destruction experts, and national security officials within the government.
Threat at at Extinction Level
The report, released this week, categorically suggests that more advanced AI systems than humans could, in the worst case scenario, "pose an extinction-level threat to the human race," according to the Gladstone AI group that prepared the report.
Featuring national security experts and Silicon Valley executives with AI expertise, Gladstone AI advises the U.S. national security and defense communities on dealing with the opportunities and risks that come with unprecedented and accelerating AI capabilities.
The report ’ s warning is yet another reminder that while AI ’ s potential continues to captivate investors and the public, there are also real risks surrounding it.
Jeremy Harris, CEO and co-founder of Gladstone Group, said: “AI is a breakthrough technology that can allow us to heal diseases, make scientific discoveries, and overcome challenges we once thought insurmountable.
Growing evidence of increased risk
“But this technology may also bring serious risks, including catastrophic risks, that we should be aware of, ” Harris said, adding that“ a growing body of evidence — including research and empirical analysis published at the world ’ s top AI conferences — suggests that when a certain threshold of capability is exceeded, AI systems are likely to become out of control. ”
Going back to the report, competitive pressures are pushing companies to accelerate AI development “at the expense of safety and security, ” increasing the likelihood that more advanced AI systems will be“ stolen ” and “weaponized ” against the United States.
Nearly a year ago, Jeffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” quit his job at Google and set off an alarm about the technology he helped develop.
Hinton said there is a 10% chance that artificial intelligence will lead to human extinction within the next three decades.
Quasi-human capabilities
The report also pointed to some prominent figures who have warned about the existential risks posed by artificial intelligence, including SpaceX and X chairman Elon Musk, Federal Trade Commission chairman Lina Khan, and former OpenAI chief executive.
Some employees at AI companies share similar concerns, as the report said that one individual at an AI lab expressed fear of launching a specific next-generation model of open source AI, which is very bad, because one of the results of developing this model will be the destruction of democracy if it is used in areas such as election interference or voter manipulation.
The report also pointed to experts ’ concerns that AI ’ s crossing of the currently imposed human barrier could lead to “irreversible global effects, ” especially with the General Artificial Intelligence (AGI) model, a hypothetical form of AI that has human-like learning capability and may surpass that of humans.
Fear of “losing control ”
Public AI is seen as “the main driver of catastrophic risk from loss of control, ” and notes that major tech companies have spoken of having access to public AI by 2028, although others believe it could take much longer.
A previous document published by the Gladstone Group warns that the development of general artificial intelligence and capabilities approaching its level "would lead to catastrophic risks unlike anything the world has ever faced", amounting to "risks resembling weapons of mass destruction".
For example, the report stated that AI systems could be used to design and execute “high-impact cyberattacks capable of crippling critical infrastructure, ” and that“ a simple verbal or written order, such as executing an untraceable cyberattack to disrupt the North American power grid, could lead to a response of a quality that proves to be catastrophically effective. ”
Other examples that the report ’ s experts are concerned about include “large-scale ” AI-backed disinformation campaigns that destabilize societies and undermine trust in institutions; armed robotic applications such as drone attacks; psychological manipulation and the exploitation of biological sciences to produce deadly weapons; and artificial intelligence systems that seek power and are almost impossible to control.
Eh, Eh.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

As one document notes, "competitive pressures are pushing companies to accelerate AI development 'at the expense of safety and security'.

Title:

Content: 1.
Skip to content
2.
Skip to main menu
3.
Skip to more DW pages
ScienceNorth America
Report Warns Artificial Intelligence Could Cause Human Extinction
14 March 2024
A report released a few days ago warned of severe dangers surrounding the development of some sophisticated artificial intelligence models, including the destruction of societies and the collapse of democracy to the production of weapons that target humans and cannot be controlled.
https: / / p.dw.com / p / 4dTXl
A new report paints a worrying picture of the “catastrophic ” national security risks posed by rapidly evolving artificial intelligence, warning the world is running out of time to avert disaster.
The findings of the report, commissioned by the State Department, were based on interviews with more than 200 people over more than a year, including senior executives from leading artificial intelligence companies, cybersecurity researchers, weapons of mass destruction experts, and national security officials within the government.
Threat at at Extinction Level
The report, released this week, categorically suggests that more advanced AI systems than humans could, in the worst case scenario, "pose an extinction-level threat to the human race," according to the Gladstone AI group that prepared the report.
Featuring national security experts and Silicon Valley executives with AI expertise, Gladstone AI advises the U.S. national security and defense communities on dealing with the opportunities and risks that come with unprecedented and accelerating AI capabilities.
The report ’ s warning is yet another reminder that while AI ’ s potential continues to captivate investors and the public, there are also real risks surrounding it.
Jeremy Harris, CEO and co-founder of Gladstone Group, said: “AI is a breakthrough technology that can allow us to heal diseases, make scientific discoveries, and overcome challenges we once thought insurmountable.
Growing evidence of increased risk
“But this technology may also bring serious risks, including catastrophic risks, that we should be aware of, ” Harris said, adding that“ a growing body of evidence — including research and empirical analysis published at the world ’ s top AI conferences — suggests that when a certain threshold of capability is exceeded, AI systems are likely to become out of control. ”
Going back to the report, competitive pressures are pushing companies to accelerate AI development “at the expense of safety and security, ” increasing the likelihood that more advanced AI systems will be“ stolen ” and “weaponized ” against the United States.
Nearly a year ago, Jeffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” quit his job at Google and set off an alarm about the technology he helped develop.
Hinton said there is a 10% chance that artificial intelligence will lead to human extinction within the next three decades.
Quasi-human capabilities
The report also pointed to some prominent figures who have warned about the existential risks posed by artificial intelligence, including SpaceX and X chairman Elon Musk, Federal Trade Commission chairman Lina Khan, and former OpenAI chief executive.
Some employees at AI companies share similar concerns, as the report said that one individual at an AI lab expressed fear of launching a specific next-generation model of open source AI, which is very bad, because one of the results of developing this model will be the destruction of democracy if it is used in areas such as election interference or voter manipulation.
The report also pointed to experts ’ concerns that AI ’ s crossing of the currently imposed human barrier could lead to “irreversible global effects, ” especially with the General Artificial Intelligence (AGI) model, a hypothetical form of AI that has human-like learning capability and may surpass that of humans.
Fear of “losing control ”
Public AI is seen as “the main driver of catastrophic risk from loss of control, ” and notes that major tech companies have spoken of having access to public AI by 2028, although others believe it could take much longer.
A previous document published by the Gladstone Group warns that the development of general artificial intelligence and capabilities approaching its level "would lead to catastrophic risks unlike anything the world has ever faced", amounting to "risks resembling weapons of mass destruction".
For example, the report stated that AI systems could be used to design and execute “high-impact cyberattacks capable of crippling critical infrastructure, ” and that“ a simple verbal or written order, such as executing an untraceable cyberattack to disrupt the North American power grid, could lead to a response of a quality that proves to be catastrophically effective. ”
Other examples that the report ’ s experts are concerned about include “large-scale ” AI-backed disinformation campaigns that destabilize societies and undermine trust in institutions; armed robotic applications such as drone attacks; psychological manipulation and the exploitation of biological sciences to produce deadly weapons; and artificial intelligence systems that seek power and are almost impossible to control.
Eh, Eh.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

"

## Reactions from Other Experts

Hinton is not alone in his concerns.

Title:

Content: Doctors Warn: ‘AI Is An Existential Threat To Humanity’

Fact checked

Experts say advanced AI could 'learn to bypass any constraints in its code'

Doctors and public health experts from around the world have issued a fresh call for the developement of Artificial Intelligence to be halted warning that the technology poses an existental threat to humanity.

Their warning follows almost a month after tech experts also warned that AI could cause the destruction of humanity and that its development should be banned.

According to a team of medical professionals and global health policy experts, there are three ways in which the AI could wipe out humans.

The Mail Online reports: First is the risk that AI will help amplify authoritarian tactics like surveillance and disinformation. ‘The ability of AI to rapidly clean, organise and analyse massive data sets consisting of personal data, including images collected by the increasingly ubiquitous presence of cameras,’ they say, could make it easier for authoritarian or totalitarian regimes to come to power and stay in power.

Second, the group warns that AI can accelerate mass murder via the expanded use of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS).

And, lastly, the health experts expressed worry over the potential for severe economic devastation and human misery, as untold millions lose their livelihoods to those hard-working bots. ‘Projections of the speed and scale of job losses due to AI-driven automation,’ according to the authors, ‘range from tens to hundreds of millions over the coming decade.’

There commentary comes only weeks after over a thousand scientists, including John Hopfield from Princeton and Rachel Branson from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, signed a letter calling for a halt to AI research over similar concerns

Of course, today’s text-based AI resources, like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, don’t exactly pose the apocalyptic threats that these health policy professionals have in mind.

The experts – led by a physician with the International Institute for Global Health at United Nations University – said their most dire warnings applied to a highly advanced, and still theoretical category of artificial intelligence: self-improving general-purpose AI, or AGI.

AGI would be more capable of truly learning and modifying its own code to perform the wide range of tasks that only humans are capable of today.

In their commentary, the health experts argue that such an AGI ‘could theoretically learn to bypass any constraints in its code and start developing its own purposes.’

‘There are scenarios where AGI could present a threat to humans, and possibly an existential threat,’ the experts wrote, ‘by intentionally or unintentionally causing harm directly or indirectly, by attacking or subjugating humans or by disrupting the systems or using up resources we depend on.’

While such a threat is likely to be decades away, the health policy experts’ commentary, published today in the British Medical Association journal BMJ Global Health, unpacked the myriad possibilities for abuse of today’s level of AI technology.

Describing threats to ‘democracy, liberty and privacy,’ the authors described how governments and other large institutions might automate the complex tasks of mass surveillance and online digital disinformation programs to AI.

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

Other prominent figures in technology have also expressed alarm about AI's potential risks:

- Sam Altman (creator of ChatGPT), Demis Hassabis (head of Google's DeepMind), and Kevin Scott (Microsoft's CTO) signed a statement warning about "extinction risks" to humanity associated with AI.

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

- Elon Musk has long warned about AI dangers, famously stating that "AI is potentially more dangerous than nukes.

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

"

- The White House, through Vice President Kamala Harris, has begun pressuring AI companies to implement safeguards.

However, not everyone agrees on how to address these concerns.

Title:

Content: Technology experts have raised concerns about the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI). In response, philanthropists, including established foundations and tech billionaires, have increased their grants in this field. The focus of much of this philanthropy is on “technology for good” or “ethical AI,” which aims to address and lessen the negative impacts of AI systems.

Some scientists believe that AI can be utilized to predict climate disasters and discover life-saving drugs. However, others caution that the advancement of large language models in AI could pose threats such as the displacement of white-collar professions, the spread of misinformation, and risks to national security.

Philanthropy is proving to be influential in shaping the trajectory of AI. Tech billionaires tend to support projects and institutions that highlight the positive outcomes of AI, leveraging their fortunes earned in the technology sector. On the other hand, foundations without substantial technology endowments tend to focus more on the potential dangers associated with AI.

As the pace of artificial-intelligence development continues to accelerate, it is becoming increasingly important to explore and implement measures that ensure AI is used responsibly and ethically. Philanthropists are playing a crucial role in funding initiatives that promote the use of AI for the greater good while addressing its potential risks.

Bill Gates, for instance, commented that a temporary pause in AI development wouldn't do much to solve upcoming challenges, expressing skepticism about whether such a pause could be implemented globally.

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

## What the Public Should Understand

### 1.

The Technology Is Moving Faster Than Regulation

AI development is advancing rapidly, while regulations and safety measures lag behind.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Hinton believes now is the time to conduct experiments to better understand AI and pass laws to ensure its ethical use.

Title:

Content: Thanks for your consideration.

Empty Suits

If there's one thing people fear about AI beyond a Terminator-style apocalypse, it's that the rise of these generative models — which were relentlessly trained on everyone's hard work without permission but with full impunity — is going to destroy their jobs.

The question of job destruction is one that OpenAI engineers were asked about in a resurfaced interview spotlighted this week by The Atlantic. The people building these AI models do acknowledge that what they're doing is "unfair." But if the attempt was to seem more ethically conscious, the effect only amplifies their callousness.

"It's kind of deeply unfair that, you know, a group of people can just build AI and take everyone's jobs away, and in some sense, there's nothing you can do to stop them right now," said Brian Wu, an engineer at the company, in the video.

It won't be all bad news, he suggests, because people will get to "think about what to do in a world where labor is obsolete."

But as he goes on, Wu sounds more and more unconvinced by his own words, as if he's already surrendered himself to the inevitability of this dystopian AI future.

"I don't know," he said. "Raise awareness, get governments to care, get other people to care." A long pause. "Yeah. Or join us and have one of the few remaining jobs. I don't know. It's rough."

AGI in the Sky

There may be some genuine contrition in Wu's faltering response. His colleague Daniel Kokotajlo, however, swoops in to confidently declare that the ends will justify the means once humans create an artificial general intelligence (AGI), an all-powerful AI that surpasses human cognition.

"To add to that," Kokotajlo said, "AGI is going to create tremendous wealth. And if that wealth is distributed — even if it's not equitably distributed, but the closer it is to equitable distribution, it's going to make everyone incredibly wealthy."

Of course, he concedes, there's "tremendous risks" if the AGI doesn't align itself with human interests. Yet, if we avoid those risks, "I think you won't need a job," Kokotajlo avers. "You'll be plenty happy."

These are astoundingly arrogant assumptions to make. But like how OpenAI CEO Sam Altman allegedly ignored Scarlett Johannson's opposition to her voice being used for a new version of ChatGPT, this behavior is emblematic of the haughty feeling of impunity that governs the AI industry.

That they'll create an artificial superintelligence is almost a foregone conclusion to them. And so they can casually brush off all this prattle about lost jobs and stolen artwork because what they're creating is one of the most important inventions in human history — so important, they seem to believe, that they never need to give any serious thought to the immense societal obstacles in the way of its supposedly utopian outcomes.

More on AI: African Workers Doing OpenAI's Training Say They're Being Subjected to "Modern Day Slavery"

Share This Article

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

### 2.

What is the AI problem called confabulation, according to Hinton?

It's when AI makes up plausible answers to questions it can't answer.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

The Benefits and Risks Are Both Significant

Despite his concerns, Hinton doesn't regret his work because of AI's tremendous potential to benefit humanity.

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: 1.
Skip to content
2.
Skip to main menu
3.
Skip to more DW pages
ScienceNorth America
Report Warns Artificial Intelligence Could Cause Human Extinction
14 March 2024
A report released a few days ago warned of severe dangers surrounding the development of some sophisticated artificial intelligence models, including the destruction of societies and the collapse of democracy to the production of weapons that target humans and cannot be controlled.
https: / / p.dw.com / p / 4dTXl
A new report paints a worrying picture of the “catastrophic ” national security risks posed by rapidly evolving artificial intelligence, warning the world is running out of time to avert disaster.
The findings of the report, commissioned by the State Department, were based on interviews with more than 200 people over more than a year, including senior executives from leading artificial intelligence companies, cybersecurity researchers, weapons of mass destruction experts, and national security officials within the government.
Threat at at Extinction Level
The report, released this week, categorically suggests that more advanced AI systems than humans could, in the worst case scenario, "pose an extinction-level threat to the human race," according to the Gladstone AI group that prepared the report.
Featuring national security experts and Silicon Valley executives with AI expertise, Gladstone AI advises the U.S. national security and defense communities on dealing with the opportunities and risks that come with unprecedented and accelerating AI capabilities.
The report ’ s warning is yet another reminder that while AI ’ s potential continues to captivate investors and the public, there are also real risks surrounding it.
Jeremy Harris, CEO and co-founder of Gladstone Group, said: “AI is a breakthrough technology that can allow us to heal diseases, make scientific discoveries, and overcome challenges we once thought insurmountable.
Growing evidence of increased risk
“But this technology may also bring serious risks, including catastrophic risks, that we should be aware of, ” Harris said, adding that“ a growing body of evidence — including research and empirical analysis published at the world ’ s top AI conferences — suggests that when a certain threshold of capability is exceeded, AI systems are likely to become out of control. ”
Going back to the report, competitive pressures are pushing companies to accelerate AI development “at the expense of safety and security, ” increasing the likelihood that more advanced AI systems will be“ stolen ” and “weaponized ” against the United States.
Nearly a year ago, Jeffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” quit his job at Google and set off an alarm about the technology he helped develop.
Hinton said there is a 10% chance that artificial intelligence will lead to human extinction within the next three decades.
Quasi-human capabilities
The report also pointed to some prominent figures who have warned about the existential risks posed by artificial intelligence, including SpaceX and X chairman Elon Musk, Federal Trade Commission chairman Lina Khan, and former OpenAI chief executive.
Some employees at AI companies share similar concerns, as the report said that one individual at an AI lab expressed fear of launching a specific next-generation model of open source AI, which is very bad, because one of the results of developing this model will be the destruction of democracy if it is used in areas such as election interference or voter manipulation.
The report also pointed to experts ’ concerns that AI ’ s crossing of the currently imposed human barrier could lead to “irreversible global effects, ” especially with the General Artificial Intelligence (AGI) model, a hypothetical form of AI that has human-like learning capability and may surpass that of humans.
Fear of “losing control ”
Public AI is seen as “the main driver of catastrophic risk from loss of control, ” and notes that major tech companies have spoken of having access to public AI by 2028, although others believe it could take much longer.
A previous document published by the Gladstone Group warns that the development of general artificial intelligence and capabilities approaching its level "would lead to catastrophic risks unlike anything the world has ever faced", amounting to "risks resembling weapons of mass destruction".
For example, the report stated that AI systems could be used to design and execute “high-impact cyberattacks capable of crippling critical infrastructure, ” and that“ a simple verbal or written order, such as executing an untraceable cyberattack to disrupt the North American power grid, could lead to a response of a quality that proves to be catastrophically effective. ”
Other examples that the report ’ s experts are concerned about include “large-scale ” AI-backed disinformation campaigns that destabilize societies and undermine trust in institutions; armed robotic applications such as drone attacks; psychological manipulation and the exploitation of biological sciences to produce deadly weapons; and artificial intelligence systems that seek power and are almost impossible to control.
Eh, Eh.

He acknowledges that AI could solve many of the world's most pressing problems, from disease to climate change.

Title:

Content: Thanks for your consideration.

Empty Suits

If there's one thing people fear about AI beyond a Terminator-style apocalypse, it's that the rise of these generative models — which were relentlessly trained on everyone's hard work without permission but with full impunity — is going to destroy their jobs.

The question of job destruction is one that OpenAI engineers were asked about in a resurfaced interview spotlighted this week by The Atlantic. The people building these AI models do acknowledge that what they're doing is "unfair." But if the attempt was to seem more ethically conscious, the effect only amplifies their callousness.

"It's kind of deeply unfair that, you know, a group of people can just build AI and take everyone's jobs away, and in some sense, there's nothing you can do to stop them right now," said Brian Wu, an engineer at the company, in the video.

It won't be all bad news, he suggests, because people will get to "think about what to do in a world where labor is obsolete."

But as he goes on, Wu sounds more and more unconvinced by his own words, as if he's already surrendered himself to the inevitability of this dystopian AI future.

"I don't know," he said. "Raise awareness, get governments to care, get other people to care." A long pause. "Yeah. Or join us and have one of the few remaining jobs. I don't know. It's rough."

AGI in the Sky

There may be some genuine contrition in Wu's faltering response. His colleague Daniel Kokotajlo, however, swoops in to confidently declare that the ends will justify the means once humans create an artificial general intelligence (AGI), an all-powerful AI that surpasses human cognition.

"To add to that," Kokotajlo said, "AGI is going to create tremendous wealth. And if that wealth is distributed — even if it's not equitably distributed, but the closer it is to equitable distribution, it's going to make everyone incredibly wealthy."

Of course, he concedes, there's "tremendous risks" if the AGI doesn't align itself with human interests. Yet, if we avoid those risks, "I think you won't need a job," Kokotajlo avers. "You'll be plenty happy."

These are astoundingly arrogant assumptions to make. But like how OpenAI CEO Sam Altman allegedly ignored Scarlett Johannson's opposition to her voice being used for a new version of ChatGPT, this behavior is emblematic of the haughty feeling of impunity that governs the AI industry.

That they'll create an artificial superintelligence is almost a foregone conclusion to them. And so they can casually brush off all this prattle about lost jobs and stolen artwork because what they're creating is one of the most important inventions in human history — so important, they seem to believe, that they never need to give any serious thought to the immense societal obstacles in the way of its supposedly utopian outcomes.

More on AI: African Workers Doing OpenAI's Training Say They're Being Subjected to "Modern Day Slavery"

Share This Article

Title:

Content: Technology experts have raised concerns about the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI). In response, philanthropists, including established foundations and tech billionaires, have increased their grants in this field. The focus of much of this philanthropy is on “technology for good” or “ethical AI,” which aims to address and lessen the negative impacts of AI systems.

Some scientists believe that AI can be utilized to predict climate disasters and discover life-saving drugs. However, others caution that the advancement of large language models in AI could pose threats such as the displacement of white-collar professions, the spread of misinformation, and risks to national security.

Philanthropy is proving to be influential in shaping the trajectory of AI. Tech billionaires tend to support projects and institutions that highlight the positive outcomes of AI, leveraging their fortunes earned in the technology sector. On the other hand, foundations without substantial technology endowments tend to focus more on the potential dangers associated with AI.

As the pace of artificial-intelligence development continues to accelerate, it is becoming increasingly important to explore and implement measures that ensure AI is used responsibly and ethically. Philanthropists are playing a crucial role in funding initiatives that promote the use of AI for the greater good while addressing its potential risks.

However, he believes we must carefully manage the risks to avoid catastrophic outcomes.

Title:

Content: Doctors Warn: ‘AI Is An Existential Threat To Humanity’

Fact checked

Experts say advanced AI could 'learn to bypass any constraints in its code'

Doctors and public health experts from around the world have issued a fresh call for the developement of Artificial Intelligence to be halted warning that the technology poses an existental threat to humanity.

Their warning follows almost a month after tech experts also warned that AI could cause the destruction of humanity and that its development should be banned.

According to a team of medical professionals and global health policy experts, there are three ways in which the AI could wipe out humans.

The Mail Online reports: First is the risk that AI will help amplify authoritarian tactics like surveillance and disinformation. ‘The ability of AI to rapidly clean, organise and analyse massive data sets consisting of personal data, including images collected by the increasingly ubiquitous presence of cameras,’ they say, could make it easier for authoritarian or totalitarian regimes to come to power and stay in power.

Second, the group warns that AI can accelerate mass murder via the expanded use of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS).

And, lastly, the health experts expressed worry over the potential for severe economic devastation and human misery, as untold millions lose their livelihoods to those hard-working bots. ‘Projections of the speed and scale of job losses due to AI-driven automation,’ according to the authors, ‘range from tens to hundreds of millions over the coming decade.’

There commentary comes only weeks after over a thousand scientists, including John Hopfield from Princeton and Rachel Branson from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, signed a letter calling for a halt to AI research over similar concerns

Of course, today’s text-based AI resources, like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, don’t exactly pose the apocalyptic threats that these health policy professionals have in mind.

The experts – led by a physician with the International Institute for Global Health at United Nations University – said their most dire warnings applied to a highly advanced, and still theoretical category of artificial intelligence: self-improving general-purpose AI, or AGI.

AGI would be more capable of truly learning and modifying its own code to perform the wide range of tasks that only humans are capable of today.

In their commentary, the health experts argue that such an AGI ‘could theoretically learn to bypass any constraints in its code and start developing its own purposes.’

‘There are scenarios where AGI could present a threat to humans, and possibly an existential threat,’ the experts wrote, ‘by intentionally or unintentionally causing harm directly or indirectly, by attacking or subjugating humans or by disrupting the systems or using up resources we depend on.’

While such a threat is likely to be decades away, the health policy experts’ commentary, published today in the British Medical Association journal BMJ Global Health, unpacked the myriad possibilities for abuse of today’s level of AI technology.

Describing threats to ‘democracy, liberty and privacy,’ the authors described how governments and other large institutions might automate the complex tasks of mass surveillance and online digital disinformation programs to AI.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Poses ethical risks
Becomes uncontrollable

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

### 3.

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

What is the AI problem called confabulation, according to Hinton?

It's when AI makes up plausible answers to questions it can't answer.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

This Isn't Just a Technical Issue

The debate over AI's future isn't just for technologists—it's a societal issue that affects everyone.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Questions about AI development involve ethics, economics, politics, and philosophy.

Title:

Content: Thanks for your consideration.

Empty Suits

If there's one thing people fear about AI beyond a Terminator-style apocalypse, it's that the rise of these generative models — which were relentlessly trained on everyone's hard work without permission but with full impunity — is going to destroy their jobs.

The question of job destruction is one that OpenAI engineers were asked about in a resurfaced interview spotlighted this week by The Atlantic. The people building these AI models do acknowledge that what they're doing is "unfair." But if the attempt was to seem more ethically conscious, the effect only amplifies their callousness.

"It's kind of deeply unfair that, you know, a group of people can just build AI and take everyone's jobs away, and in some sense, there's nothing you can do to stop them right now," said Brian Wu, an engineer at the company, in the video.

It won't be all bad news, he suggests, because people will get to "think about what to do in a world where labor is obsolete."

But as he goes on, Wu sounds more and more unconvinced by his own words, as if he's already surrendered himself to the inevitability of this dystopian AI future.

"I don't know," he said. "Raise awareness, get governments to care, get other people to care." A long pause. "Yeah. Or join us and have one of the few remaining jobs. I don't know. It's rough."

AGI in the Sky

There may be some genuine contrition in Wu's faltering response. His colleague Daniel Kokotajlo, however, swoops in to confidently declare that the ends will justify the means once humans create an artificial general intelligence (AGI), an all-powerful AI that surpasses human cognition.

"To add to that," Kokotajlo said, "AGI is going to create tremendous wealth. And if that wealth is distributed — even if it's not equitably distributed, but the closer it is to equitable distribution, it's going to make everyone incredibly wealthy."

Of course, he concedes, there's "tremendous risks" if the AGI doesn't align itself with human interests. Yet, if we avoid those risks, "I think you won't need a job," Kokotajlo avers. "You'll be plenty happy."

These are astoundingly arrogant assumptions to make. But like how OpenAI CEO Sam Altman allegedly ignored Scarlett Johannson's opposition to her voice being used for a new version of ChatGPT, this behavior is emblematic of the haughty feeling of impunity that governs the AI industry.

That they'll create an artificial superintelligence is almost a foregone conclusion to them. And so they can casually brush off all this prattle about lost jobs and stolen artwork because what they're creating is one of the most important inventions in human history — so important, they seem to believe, that they never need to give any serious thought to the immense societal obstacles in the way of its supposedly utopian outcomes.

More on AI: African Workers Doing OpenAI's Training Say They're Being Subjected to "Modern Day Slavery"

Share This Article

Title:

Content: What just happened? It's understandable why many people are concerned about artificial intelligence becoming a threat to humanity; Hollywood has pumped out plenty of movies about rogue AIs over the years. But when a warning that the world is close to "potentially scary" AI comes from Sam Altman, the CEO of ChatGPT creator OpenAI, maybe it's time to listen.

Altman, co-founder and CEO of OpenAI and the former president of Y Combinator, posted several tweets about generative AI over the weekend. He wrote that the benefits of integrating AI tools into society mean the world will likely adapt to the technology very quickly. He believes they will help us become more productive, healthier, smarter, and entertained.

Altman says this sort of transition is "mostly good" and can happen fast, comparing it to the way the world moved from the pre-smartphone to the post-smartphone era, but it will be tempting to make the move "super quickly," which he says is a frightening prospect as society needs time to adapt.

There was also a warning about the need for industry regulation. "We also need enough time for our institutions to figure out what to do. regulation will be critical and will take time to figure out; although current-generation AI tools aren't very scary, i think we are potentially not that far away from potentially scary ones," Altman tweeted.

The tweets highlighted some of the problems with generative AIs, such as Microsoft's GPT-powered Bing Chat calling users liars and being overly aggressive or rude to them. Microsoft responded to this by limiting users to 50 chat turns - a conversation exchange which contains both a user question and a reply - per day and 5 chat turns per session Altman said there would be challenges like these, which he said can leave people feeling unsettled. He also wants to ensure there are no biased results from chatbots.

Those disturbing conversations come from AIs being limited by what they're trained on and unable to "think" for themselves. It's what allowed an amateur Go player to beat a top artificial intelligence recently using a technique that humans would easily be able to identify.

Generative AI isn't the only type of artificial intelligence where regulation is becoming a priority. AI's use in warfare is under the spotlight right now and has led to more than 60 nations agreeing to put the responsible use of artificial intelligence higher on the political agenda.

Title:

Content: Technology experts have raised concerns about the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI). In response, philanthropists, including established foundations and tech billionaires, have increased their grants in this field. The focus of much of this philanthropy is on “technology for good” or “ethical AI,” which aims to address and lessen the negative impacts of AI systems.

Some scientists believe that AI can be utilized to predict climate disasters and discover life-saving drugs. However, others caution that the advancement of large language models in AI could pose threats such as the displacement of white-collar professions, the spread of misinformation, and risks to national security.

Philanthropy is proving to be influential in shaping the trajectory of AI. Tech billionaires tend to support projects and institutions that highlight the positive outcomes of AI, leveraging their fortunes earned in the technology sector. On the other hand, foundations without substantial technology endowments tend to focus more on the potential dangers associated with AI.

As the pace of artificial-intelligence development continues to accelerate, it is becoming increasingly important to explore and implement measures that ensure AI is used responsibly and ethically. Philanthropists are playing a crucial role in funding initiatives that promote the use of AI for the greater good while addressing its potential risks.

As one document asks, "Do we really want to entrust this revolutionary technology solely to a small group of U.

S.

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

tech companies?

"

### 4.

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

Public Awareness and Engagement Matter

Hinton's warnings highlight the need for greater public understanding of AI issues.

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: What just happened? It's understandable why many people are concerned about artificial intelligence becoming a threat to humanity; Hollywood has pumped out plenty of movies about rogue AIs over the years. But when a warning that the world is close to "potentially scary" AI comes from Sam Altman, the CEO of ChatGPT creator OpenAI, maybe it's time to listen.

Altman, co-founder and CEO of OpenAI and the former president of Y Combinator, posted several tweets about generative AI over the weekend. He wrote that the benefits of integrating AI tools into society mean the world will likely adapt to the technology very quickly. He believes they will help us become more productive, healthier, smarter, and entertained.

Altman says this sort of transition is "mostly good" and can happen fast, comparing it to the way the world moved from the pre-smartphone to the post-smartphone era, but it will be tempting to make the move "super quickly," which he says is a frightening prospect as society needs time to adapt.

There was also a warning about the need for industry regulation. "We also need enough time for our institutions to figure out what to do. regulation will be critical and will take time to figure out; although current-generation AI tools aren't very scary, i think we are potentially not that far away from potentially scary ones," Altman tweeted.

The tweets highlighted some of the problems with generative AIs, such as Microsoft's GPT-powered Bing Chat calling users liars and being overly aggressive or rude to them. Microsoft responded to this by limiting users to 50 chat turns - a conversation exchange which contains both a user question and a reply - per day and 5 chat turns per session Altman said there would be challenges like these, which he said can leave people feeling unsettled. He also wants to ensure there are no biased results from chatbots.

Those disturbing conversations come from AIs being limited by what they're trained on and unable to "think" for themselves. It's what allowed an amateur Go player to beat a top artificial intelligence recently using a technique that humans would easily be able to identify.

Generative AI isn't the only type of artificial intelligence where regulation is becoming a priority. AI's use in warfare is under the spotlight right now and has led to more than 60 nations agreeing to put the responsible use of artificial intelligence higher on the political agenda.

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

As AI becomes more integrated into our lives, citizens need to be informed participants in discussions about how this technology should be developed and regulated.

Title:

Content: Thanks for your consideration.

Empty Suits

If there's one thing people fear about AI beyond a Terminator-style apocalypse, it's that the rise of these generative models — which were relentlessly trained on everyone's hard work without permission but with full impunity — is going to destroy their jobs.

The question of job destruction is one that OpenAI engineers were asked about in a resurfaced interview spotlighted this week by The Atlantic. The people building these AI models do acknowledge that what they're doing is "unfair." But if the attempt was to seem more ethically conscious, the effect only amplifies their callousness.

"It's kind of deeply unfair that, you know, a group of people can just build AI and take everyone's jobs away, and in some sense, there's nothing you can do to stop them right now," said Brian Wu, an engineer at the company, in the video.

It won't be all bad news, he suggests, because people will get to "think about what to do in a world where labor is obsolete."

But as he goes on, Wu sounds more and more unconvinced by his own words, as if he's already surrendered himself to the inevitability of this dystopian AI future.

"I don't know," he said. "Raise awareness, get governments to care, get other people to care." A long pause. "Yeah. Or join us and have one of the few remaining jobs. I don't know. It's rough."

AGI in the Sky

There may be some genuine contrition in Wu's faltering response. His colleague Daniel Kokotajlo, however, swoops in to confidently declare that the ends will justify the means once humans create an artificial general intelligence (AGI), an all-powerful AI that surpasses human cognition.

"To add to that," Kokotajlo said, "AGI is going to create tremendous wealth. And if that wealth is distributed — even if it's not equitably distributed, but the closer it is to equitable distribution, it's going to make everyone incredibly wealthy."

Of course, he concedes, there's "tremendous risks" if the AGI doesn't align itself with human interests. Yet, if we avoid those risks, "I think you won't need a job," Kokotajlo avers. "You'll be plenty happy."

These are astoundingly arrogant assumptions to make. But like how OpenAI CEO Sam Altman allegedly ignored Scarlett Johannson's opposition to her voice being used for a new version of ChatGPT, this behavior is emblematic of the haughty feeling of impunity that governs the AI industry.

That they'll create an artificial superintelligence is almost a foregone conclusion to them. And so they can casually brush off all this prattle about lost jobs and stolen artwork because what they're creating is one of the most important inventions in human history — so important, they seem to believe, that they never need to give any serious thought to the immense societal obstacles in the way of its supposedly utopian outcomes.

More on AI: African Workers Doing OpenAI's Training Say They're Being Subjected to "Modern Day Slavery"

Share This Article

Title:

Content: What just happened? It's understandable why many people are concerned about artificial intelligence becoming a threat to humanity; Hollywood has pumped out plenty of movies about rogue AIs over the years. But when a warning that the world is close to "potentially scary" AI comes from Sam Altman, the CEO of ChatGPT creator OpenAI, maybe it's time to listen.

Altman, co-founder and CEO of OpenAI and the former president of Y Combinator, posted several tweets about generative AI over the weekend. He wrote that the benefits of integrating AI tools into society mean the world will likely adapt to the technology very quickly. He believes they will help us become more productive, healthier, smarter, and entertained.

Altman says this sort of transition is "mostly good" and can happen fast, comparing it to the way the world moved from the pre-smartphone to the post-smartphone era, but it will be tempting to make the move "super quickly," which he says is a frightening prospect as society needs time to adapt.

There was also a warning about the need for industry regulation. "We also need enough time for our institutions to figure out what to do. regulation will be critical and will take time to figure out; although current-generation AI tools aren't very scary, i think we are potentially not that far away from potentially scary ones," Altman tweeted.

The tweets highlighted some of the problems with generative AIs, such as Microsoft's GPT-powered Bing Chat calling users liars and being overly aggressive or rude to them. Microsoft responded to this by limiting users to 50 chat turns - a conversation exchange which contains both a user question and a reply - per day and 5 chat turns per session Altman said there would be challenges like these, which he said can leave people feeling unsettled. He also wants to ensure there are no biased results from chatbots.

Those disturbing conversations come from AIs being limited by what they're trained on and unable to "think" for themselves. It's what allowed an amateur Go player to beat a top artificial intelligence recently using a technique that humans would easily be able to identify.

Generative AI isn't the only type of artificial intelligence where regulation is becoming a priority. AI's use in warfare is under the spotlight right now and has led to more than 60 nations agreeing to put the responsible use of artificial intelligence higher on the political agenda.

Title:

Content: Doctors Warn: ‘AI Is An Existential Threat To Humanity’

Fact checked

Experts say advanced AI could 'learn to bypass any constraints in its code'

Doctors and public health experts from around the world have issued a fresh call for the developement of Artificial Intelligence to be halted warning that the technology poses an existental threat to humanity.

Their warning follows almost a month after tech experts also warned that AI could cause the destruction of humanity and that its development should be banned.

According to a team of medical professionals and global health policy experts, there are three ways in which the AI could wipe out humans.

The Mail Online reports: First is the risk that AI will help amplify authoritarian tactics like surveillance and disinformation. ‘The ability of AI to rapidly clean, organise and analyse massive data sets consisting of personal data, including images collected by the increasingly ubiquitous presence of cameras,’ they say, could make it easier for authoritarian or totalitarian regimes to come to power and stay in power.

Second, the group warns that AI can accelerate mass murder via the expanded use of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS).

And, lastly, the health experts expressed worry over the potential for severe economic devastation and human misery, as untold millions lose their livelihoods to those hard-working bots. ‘Projections of the speed and scale of job losses due to AI-driven automation,’ according to the authors, ‘range from tens to hundreds of millions over the coming decade.’

There commentary comes only weeks after over a thousand scientists, including John Hopfield from Princeton and Rachel Branson from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, signed a letter calling for a halt to AI research over similar concerns

Of course, today’s text-based AI resources, like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, don’t exactly pose the apocalyptic threats that these health policy professionals have in mind.

The experts – led by a physician with the International Institute for Global Health at United Nations University – said their most dire warnings applied to a highly advanced, and still theoretical category of artificial intelligence: self-improving general-purpose AI, or AGI.

AGI would be more capable of truly learning and modifying its own code to perform the wide range of tasks that only humans are capable of today.

In their commentary, the health experts argue that such an AGI ‘could theoretically learn to bypass any constraints in its code and start developing its own purposes.’

‘There are scenarios where AGI could present a threat to humans, and possibly an existential threat,’ the experts wrote, ‘by intentionally or unintentionally causing harm directly or indirectly, by attacking or subjugating humans or by disrupting the systems or using up resources we depend on.’

While such a threat is likely to be decades away, the health policy experts’ commentary, published today in the British Medical Association journal BMJ Global Health, unpacked the myriad possibilities for abuse of today’s level of AI technology.

Describing threats to ‘democracy, liberty and privacy,’ the authors described how governments and other large institutions might automate the complex tasks of mass surveillance and online digital disinformation programs to AI.

## Conclusion

Geoffrey Hinton's resignation from Google and his subsequent warnings represent a pivotal moment in the conversation about AI's future.

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

Title:

Content: 1.
Skip to content
2.
Skip to main menu
3.
Skip to more DW pages
ScienceNorth America
Report Warns Artificial Intelligence Could Cause Human Extinction
14 March 2024
A report released a few days ago warned of severe dangers surrounding the development of some sophisticated artificial intelligence models, including the destruction of societies and the collapse of democracy to the production of weapons that target humans and cannot be controlled.
https: / / p.dw.com / p / 4dTXl
A new report paints a worrying picture of the “catastrophic ” national security risks posed by rapidly evolving artificial intelligence, warning the world is running out of time to avert disaster.
The findings of the report, commissioned by the State Department, were based on interviews with more than 200 people over more than a year, including senior executives from leading artificial intelligence companies, cybersecurity researchers, weapons of mass destruction experts, and national security officials within the government.
Threat at at Extinction Level
The report, released this week, categorically suggests that more advanced AI systems than humans could, in the worst case scenario, "pose an extinction-level threat to the human race," according to the Gladstone AI group that prepared the report.
Featuring national security experts and Silicon Valley executives with AI expertise, Gladstone AI advises the U.S. national security and defense communities on dealing with the opportunities and risks that come with unprecedented and accelerating AI capabilities.
The report ’ s warning is yet another reminder that while AI ’ s potential continues to captivate investors and the public, there are also real risks surrounding it.
Jeremy Harris, CEO and co-founder of Gladstone Group, said: “AI is a breakthrough technology that can allow us to heal diseases, make scientific discoveries, and overcome challenges we once thought insurmountable.
Growing evidence of increased risk
“But this technology may also bring serious risks, including catastrophic risks, that we should be aware of, ” Harris said, adding that“ a growing body of evidence — including research and empirical analysis published at the world ’ s top AI conferences — suggests that when a certain threshold of capability is exceeded, AI systems are likely to become out of control. ”
Going back to the report, competitive pressures are pushing companies to accelerate AI development “at the expense of safety and security, ” increasing the likelihood that more advanced AI systems will be“ stolen ” and “weaponized ” against the United States.
Nearly a year ago, Jeffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” quit his job at Google and set off an alarm about the technology he helped develop.
Hinton said there is a 10% chance that artificial intelligence will lead to human extinction within the next three decades.
Quasi-human capabilities
The report also pointed to some prominent figures who have warned about the existential risks posed by artificial intelligence, including SpaceX and X chairman Elon Musk, Federal Trade Commission chairman Lina Khan, and former OpenAI chief executive.
Some employees at AI companies share similar concerns, as the report said that one individual at an AI lab expressed fear of launching a specific next-generation model of open source AI, which is very bad, because one of the results of developing this model will be the destruction of democracy if it is used in areas such as election interference or voter manipulation.
The report also pointed to experts ’ concerns that AI ’ s crossing of the currently imposed human barrier could lead to “irreversible global effects, ” especially with the General Artificial Intelligence (AGI) model, a hypothetical form of AI that has human-like learning capability and may surpass that of humans.
Fear of “losing control ”
Public AI is seen as “the main driver of catastrophic risk from loss of control, ” and notes that major tech companies have spoken of having access to public AI by 2028, although others believe it could take much longer.
A previous document published by the Gladstone Group warns that the development of general artificial intelligence and capabilities approaching its level "would lead to catastrophic risks unlike anything the world has ever faced", amounting to "risks resembling weapons of mass destruction".
For example, the report stated that AI systems could be used to design and execute “high-impact cyberattacks capable of crippling critical infrastructure, ” and that“ a simple verbal or written order, such as executing an untraceable cyberattack to disrupt the North American power grid, could lead to a response of a quality that proves to be catastrophically effective. ”
Other examples that the report ’ s experts are concerned about include “large-scale ” AI-backed disinformation campaigns that destabilize societies and undermine trust in institutions; armed robotic applications such as drone attacks; psychological manipulation and the exploitation of biological sciences to produce deadly weapons; and artificial intelligence systems that seek power and are almost impossible to control.
Eh, Eh.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

As one of the architects of modern AI technology, his concerns carry significant weight and deserve serious attention.

Title:

Content: Thanks for your consideration.

Empty Suits

If there's one thing people fear about AI beyond a Terminator-style apocalypse, it's that the rise of these generative models — which were relentlessly trained on everyone's hard work without permission but with full impunity — is going to destroy their jobs.

The question of job destruction is one that OpenAI engineers were asked about in a resurfaced interview spotlighted this week by The Atlantic. The people building these AI models do acknowledge that what they're doing is "unfair." But if the attempt was to seem more ethically conscious, the effect only amplifies their callousness.

"It's kind of deeply unfair that, you know, a group of people can just build AI and take everyone's jobs away, and in some sense, there's nothing you can do to stop them right now," said Brian Wu, an engineer at the company, in the video.

It won't be all bad news, he suggests, because people will get to "think about what to do in a world where labor is obsolete."

But as he goes on, Wu sounds more and more unconvinced by his own words, as if he's already surrendered himself to the inevitability of this dystopian AI future.

"I don't know," he said. "Raise awareness, get governments to care, get other people to care." A long pause. "Yeah. Or join us and have one of the few remaining jobs. I don't know. It's rough."

AGI in the Sky

There may be some genuine contrition in Wu's faltering response. His colleague Daniel Kokotajlo, however, swoops in to confidently declare that the ends will justify the means once humans create an artificial general intelligence (AGI), an all-powerful AI that surpasses human cognition.

"To add to that," Kokotajlo said, "AGI is going to create tremendous wealth. And if that wealth is distributed — even if it's not equitably distributed, but the closer it is to equitable distribution, it's going to make everyone incredibly wealthy."

Of course, he concedes, there's "tremendous risks" if the AGI doesn't align itself with human interests. Yet, if we avoid those risks, "I think you won't need a job," Kokotajlo avers. "You'll be plenty happy."

These are astoundingly arrogant assumptions to make. But like how OpenAI CEO Sam Altman allegedly ignored Scarlett Johannson's opposition to her voice being used for a new version of ChatGPT, this behavior is emblematic of the haughty feeling of impunity that governs the AI industry.

That they'll create an artificial superintelligence is almost a foregone conclusion to them. And so they can casually brush off all this prattle about lost jobs and stolen artwork because what they're creating is one of the most important inventions in human history — so important, they seem to believe, that they never need to give any serious thought to the immense societal obstacles in the way of its supposedly utopian outcomes.

More on AI: African Workers Doing OpenAI's Training Say They're Being Subjected to "Modern Day Slavery"

Share This Article

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

Title:

Content: What just happened? It's understandable why many people are concerned about artificial intelligence becoming a threat to humanity; Hollywood has pumped out plenty of movies about rogue AIs over the years. But when a warning that the world is close to "potentially scary" AI comes from Sam Altman, the CEO of ChatGPT creator OpenAI, maybe it's time to listen.

Altman, co-founder and CEO of OpenAI and the former president of Y Combinator, posted several tweets about generative AI over the weekend. He wrote that the benefits of integrating AI tools into society mean the world will likely adapt to the technology very quickly. He believes they will help us become more productive, healthier, smarter, and entertained.

Altman says this sort of transition is "mostly good" and can happen fast, comparing it to the way the world moved from the pre-smartphone to the post-smartphone era, but it will be tempting to make the move "super quickly," which he says is a frightening prospect as society needs time to adapt.

There was also a warning about the need for industry regulation. "We also need enough time for our institutions to figure out what to do. regulation will be critical and will take time to figure out; although current-generation AI tools aren't very scary, i think we are potentially not that far away from potentially scary ones," Altman tweeted.

The tweets highlighted some of the problems with generative AIs, such as Microsoft's GPT-powered Bing Chat calling users liars and being overly aggressive or rude to them. Microsoft responded to this by limiting users to 50 chat turns - a conversation exchange which contains both a user question and a reply - per day and 5 chat turns per session Altman said there would be challenges like these, which he said can leave people feeling unsettled. He also wants to ensure there are no biased results from chatbots.

Those disturbing conversations come from AIs being limited by what they're trained on and unable to "think" for themselves. It's what allowed an amateur Go player to beat a top artificial intelligence recently using a technique that humans would easily be able to identify.

Generative AI isn't the only type of artificial intelligence where regulation is becoming a priority. AI's use in warfare is under the spotlight right now and has led to more than 60 nations agreeing to put the responsible use of artificial intelligence higher on the political agenda.

Title:

Content: Locally
2023-06-02 04: 31: 36
Daily News
Will AI really take away your job?
Share:
In early May, The Economist published an article titled “Your job (may) not be outlawed by artificial intelligence, ” which explored the impact of AI on the economy and the job market.
The article pointed out that the prediction that AI is about to trigger economic change may be over-exaggerated.
It ’ s true that AI may be affecting 80% of jobs in the United States, but this change in the job market may be slower than we expected.
More importantly, AI may bring new jobs and improve productivity in certain industries.
So, while AI comes with certain risks, it ’ s not likely to destroy the overall economy.
Text: Liu Wei-liang (Eden) /
CEO of social media business application company Tocanan
Some people take a pessimistic view that AI could trigger a lot of unemployment.
Their main arguments include: First, it is estimated that about 80% of the workforce in the United States may have at least 10% of their work tasks affected by AI.
Second, the pace of AI development has been slowed due to regulatory restrictions in heavily regulated industries such as education and healthcare.
Finally, they argue that while AI has the potential to eliminate some jobs, it may also create new jobs that we currently cannot imagine, which will lead to a turbulent job market.
On the other hand, however, there are good reasons to believe that AI will not cause mass unemployment.
First, from a historical perspective, the disruption of jobs by technology has always come more slowly than predicted.
For example, although the automatic telephone switching system was invented in 1892, it was not first implemented until 1921; even so, the number of telephone operators in the United States continued to grow until peaking at about 350,000 in the mid-20th century and largely disappeared until the 1980s.
Second, while AI has the potential to eliminate certain jobs, it can also create new jobs that we currently cannot imagine, providing new jobs.
Finally, AI may improve productivity in some industries. For example, AI tools enable customer support agents to solve problems at an average rate of 14%, which may create more jobs.
In fact, there has always been concern that AI could lead to large-scale unemployment.
Since the launch of ChatGPT last December, this concern has reached a peak in discussions on social media (Figure 1B).
One of the hottest topics of discussion is “How ChatGPT will impact white-collar work. ”
People are wondering whether AI will lead to a lot of unemployment for those who work in higher education, which is something we have never encountered in modern society.
At the Senate Judiciary, Privacy, Technology and Law Subcommittee ’ s “Regulation of Artificial Intelligence: Rules for Artificial Intelligence ” hearing on May 16, OpenAI CEO Altman acknowledged that AI will have an impact on jobs and stressed the need for industry and government to work together to mitigate the impact. He remains optimistic about the quality of his work in the future.
Currently, the market is driving the adoption of AI with the goal of making AI technology more accessible and accessible to even those without expertise in AI or technology.
Recently, there has been a view that "the best programming language is English", emphasizing that clear and understandable instructions are more important than complex code.
In order to democratize AI, we need to understand the power of AI, which is not just code and algorithms, but a tool to solve problems and derive insights from data.
In addition, we need to work to improve our understanding of AI and data, leveraging AI tools and services, such as low-code or no-code automated machine learning tools, to enable everyone to build and train AI models.
At the same time, we need to implement safe and responsible AI use, and keep abreast of the latest developments and trends in the AI field, and adjust our strategies when appropriate.
By accepting the following privacy policy and disclaimer, you agree to the privacy policy and disclaimer contained in am730.
LEARN MORE
Acceptance

Title:

Content: Technology experts have raised concerns about the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI). In response, philanthropists, including established foundations and tech billionaires, have increased their grants in this field. The focus of much of this philanthropy is on “technology for good” or “ethical AI,” which aims to address and lessen the negative impacts of AI systems.

Some scientists believe that AI can be utilized to predict climate disasters and discover life-saving drugs. However, others caution that the advancement of large language models in AI could pose threats such as the displacement of white-collar professions, the spread of misinformation, and risks to national security.

Philanthropy is proving to be influential in shaping the trajectory of AI. Tech billionaires tend to support projects and institutions that highlight the positive outcomes of AI, leveraging their fortunes earned in the technology sector. On the other hand, foundations without substantial technology endowments tend to focus more on the potential dangers associated with AI.

As the pace of artificial-intelligence development continues to accelerate, it is becoming increasingly important to explore and implement measures that ensure AI is used responsibly and ethically. Philanthropists are playing a crucial role in funding initiatives that promote the use of AI for the greater good while addressing its potential risks.

Title:

Content: Doctors Warn: ‘AI Is An Existential Threat To Humanity’

Fact checked

Experts say advanced AI could 'learn to bypass any constraints in its code'

Doctors and public health experts from around the world have issued a fresh call for the developement of Artificial Intelligence to be halted warning that the technology poses an existental threat to humanity.

Their warning follows almost a month after tech experts also warned that AI could cause the destruction of humanity and that its development should be banned.

According to a team of medical professionals and global health policy experts, there are three ways in which the AI could wipe out humans.

The Mail Online reports: First is the risk that AI will help amplify authoritarian tactics like surveillance and disinformation. ‘The ability of AI to rapidly clean, organise and analyse massive data sets consisting of personal data, including images collected by the increasingly ubiquitous presence of cameras,’ they say, could make it easier for authoritarian or totalitarian regimes to come to power and stay in power.

Second, the group warns that AI can accelerate mass murder via the expanded use of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS).

And, lastly, the health experts expressed worry over the potential for severe economic devastation and human misery, as untold millions lose their livelihoods to those hard-working bots. ‘Projections of the speed and scale of job losses due to AI-driven automation,’ according to the authors, ‘range from tens to hundreds of millions over the coming decade.’

There commentary comes only weeks after over a thousand scientists, including John Hopfield from Princeton and Rachel Branson from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, signed a letter calling for a halt to AI research over similar concerns

Of course, today’s text-based AI resources, like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, don’t exactly pose the apocalyptic threats that these health policy professionals have in mind.

The experts – led by a physician with the International Institute for Global Health at United Nations University – said their most dire warnings applied to a highly advanced, and still theoretical category of artificial intelligence: self-improving general-purpose AI, or AGI.

AGI would be more capable of truly learning and modifying its own code to perform the wide range of tasks that only humans are capable of today.

In their commentary, the health experts argue that such an AGI ‘could theoretically learn to bypass any constraints in its code and start developing its own purposes.’

‘There are scenarios where AGI could present a threat to humans, and possibly an existential threat,’ the experts wrote, ‘by intentionally or unintentionally causing harm directly or indirectly, by attacking or subjugating humans or by disrupting the systems or using up resources we depend on.’

While such a threat is likely to be decades away, the health policy experts’ commentary, published today in the British Medical Association journal BMJ Global Health, unpacked the myriad possibilities for abuse of today’s level of AI technology.

Describing threats to ‘democracy, liberty and privacy,’ the authors described how governments and other large institutions might automate the complex tasks of mass surveillance and online digital disinformation programs to AI.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

For college students and others interested in AI's impact on jobs and safety, Hinton's warnings highlight both the tremendous potential and serious risks of this technology.

Title:

Content: Thanks for your consideration.

Empty Suits

If there's one thing people fear about AI beyond a Terminator-style apocalypse, it's that the rise of these generative models — which were relentlessly trained on everyone's hard work without permission but with full impunity — is going to destroy their jobs.

The question of job destruction is one that OpenAI engineers were asked about in a resurfaced interview spotlighted this week by The Atlantic. The people building these AI models do acknowledge that what they're doing is "unfair." But if the attempt was to seem more ethically conscious, the effect only amplifies their callousness.

"It's kind of deeply unfair that, you know, a group of people can just build AI and take everyone's jobs away, and in some sense, there's nothing you can do to stop them right now," said Brian Wu, an engineer at the company, in the video.

It won't be all bad news, he suggests, because people will get to "think about what to do in a world where labor is obsolete."

But as he goes on, Wu sounds more and more unconvinced by his own words, as if he's already surrendered himself to the inevitability of this dystopian AI future.

"I don't know," he said. "Raise awareness, get governments to care, get other people to care." A long pause. "Yeah. Or join us and have one of the few remaining jobs. I don't know. It's rough."

AGI in the Sky

There may be some genuine contrition in Wu's faltering response. His colleague Daniel Kokotajlo, however, swoops in to confidently declare that the ends will justify the means once humans create an artificial general intelligence (AGI), an all-powerful AI that surpasses human cognition.

"To add to that," Kokotajlo said, "AGI is going to create tremendous wealth. And if that wealth is distributed — even if it's not equitably distributed, but the closer it is to equitable distribution, it's going to make everyone incredibly wealthy."

Of course, he concedes, there's "tremendous risks" if the AGI doesn't align itself with human interests. Yet, if we avoid those risks, "I think you won't need a job," Kokotajlo avers. "You'll be plenty happy."

These are astoundingly arrogant assumptions to make. But like how OpenAI CEO Sam Altman allegedly ignored Scarlett Johannson's opposition to her voice being used for a new version of ChatGPT, this behavior is emblematic of the haughty feeling of impunity that governs the AI industry.

That they'll create an artificial superintelligence is almost a foregone conclusion to them. And so they can casually brush off all this prattle about lost jobs and stolen artwork because what they're creating is one of the most important inventions in human history — so important, they seem to believe, that they never need to give any serious thought to the immense societal obstacles in the way of its supposedly utopian outcomes.

More on AI: African Workers Doing OpenAI's Training Say They're Being Subjected to "Modern Day Slavery"

Share This Article

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

Title:

Content: Locally
2023-06-02 04: 31: 36
Daily News
Will AI really take away your job?
Share:
In early May, The Economist published an article titled “Your job (may) not be outlawed by artificial intelligence, ” which explored the impact of AI on the economy and the job market.
The article pointed out that the prediction that AI is about to trigger economic change may be over-exaggerated.
It ’ s true that AI may be affecting 80% of jobs in the United States, but this change in the job market may be slower than we expected.
More importantly, AI may bring new jobs and improve productivity in certain industries.
So, while AI comes with certain risks, it ’ s not likely to destroy the overall economy.
Text: Liu Wei-liang (Eden) /
CEO of social media business application company Tocanan
Some people take a pessimistic view that AI could trigger a lot of unemployment.
Their main arguments include: First, it is estimated that about 80% of the workforce in the United States may have at least 10% of their work tasks affected by AI.
Second, the pace of AI development has been slowed due to regulatory restrictions in heavily regulated industries such as education and healthcare.
Finally, they argue that while AI has the potential to eliminate some jobs, it may also create new jobs that we currently cannot imagine, which will lead to a turbulent job market.
On the other hand, however, there are good reasons to believe that AI will not cause mass unemployment.
First, from a historical perspective, the disruption of jobs by technology has always come more slowly than predicted.
For example, although the automatic telephone switching system was invented in 1892, it was not first implemented until 1921; even so, the number of telephone operators in the United States continued to grow until peaking at about 350,000 in the mid-20th century and largely disappeared until the 1980s.
Second, while AI has the potential to eliminate certain jobs, it can also create new jobs that we currently cannot imagine, providing new jobs.
Finally, AI may improve productivity in some industries. For example, AI tools enable customer support agents to solve problems at an average rate of 14%, which may create more jobs.
In fact, there has always been concern that AI could lead to large-scale unemployment.
Since the launch of ChatGPT last December, this concern has reached a peak in discussions on social media (Figure 1B).
One of the hottest topics of discussion is “How ChatGPT will impact white-collar work. ”
People are wondering whether AI will lead to a lot of unemployment for those who work in higher education, which is something we have never encountered in modern society.
At the Senate Judiciary, Privacy, Technology and Law Subcommittee ’ s “Regulation of Artificial Intelligence: Rules for Artificial Intelligence ” hearing on May 16, OpenAI CEO Altman acknowledged that AI will have an impact on jobs and stressed the need for industry and government to work together to mitigate the impact. He remains optimistic about the quality of his work in the future.
Currently, the market is driving the adoption of AI with the goal of making AI technology more accessible and accessible to even those without expertise in AI or technology.
Recently, there has been a view that "the best programming language is English", emphasizing that clear and understandable instructions are more important than complex code.
In order to democratize AI, we need to understand the power of AI, which is not just code and algorithms, but a tool to solve problems and derive insights from data.
In addition, we need to work to improve our understanding of AI and data, leveraging AI tools and services, such as low-code or no-code automated machine learning tools, to enable everyone to build and train AI models.
At the same time, we need to implement safe and responsible AI use, and keep abreast of the latest developments and trends in the AI field, and adjust our strategies when appropriate.
By accepting the following privacy policy and disclaimer, you agree to the privacy policy and disclaimer contained in am730.
LEARN MORE
Acceptance

Title:

Content: Doctors Warn: ‘AI Is An Existential Threat To Humanity’

Fact checked

Experts say advanced AI could 'learn to bypass any constraints in its code'

Doctors and public health experts from around the world have issued a fresh call for the developement of Artificial Intelligence to be halted warning that the technology poses an existental threat to humanity.

Their warning follows almost a month after tech experts also warned that AI could cause the destruction of humanity and that its development should be banned.

According to a team of medical professionals and global health policy experts, there are three ways in which the AI could wipe out humans.

The Mail Online reports: First is the risk that AI will help amplify authoritarian tactics like surveillance and disinformation. ‘The ability of AI to rapidly clean, organise and analyse massive data sets consisting of personal data, including images collected by the increasingly ubiquitous presence of cameras,’ they say, could make it easier for authoritarian or totalitarian regimes to come to power and stay in power.

Second, the group warns that AI can accelerate mass murder via the expanded use of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS).

And, lastly, the health experts expressed worry over the potential for severe economic devastation and human misery, as untold millions lose their livelihoods to those hard-working bots. ‘Projections of the speed and scale of job losses due to AI-driven automation,’ according to the authors, ‘range from tens to hundreds of millions over the coming decade.’

There commentary comes only weeks after over a thousand scientists, including John Hopfield from Princeton and Rachel Branson from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, signed a letter calling for a halt to AI research over similar concerns

Of course, today’s text-based AI resources, like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, don’t exactly pose the apocalyptic threats that these health policy professionals have in mind.

The experts – led by a physician with the International Institute for Global Health at United Nations University – said their most dire warnings applied to a highly advanced, and still theoretical category of artificial intelligence: self-improving general-purpose AI, or AGI.

AGI would be more capable of truly learning and modifying its own code to perform the wide range of tasks that only humans are capable of today.

In their commentary, the health experts argue that such an AGI ‘could theoretically learn to bypass any constraints in its code and start developing its own purposes.’

‘There are scenarios where AGI could present a threat to humans, and possibly an existential threat,’ the experts wrote, ‘by intentionally or unintentionally causing harm directly or indirectly, by attacking or subjugating humans or by disrupting the systems or using up resources we depend on.’

While such a threat is likely to be decades away, the health policy experts’ commentary, published today in the British Medical Association journal BMJ Global Health, unpacked the myriad possibilities for abuse of today’s level of AI technology.

Describing threats to ‘democracy, liberty and privacy,’ the authors described how governments and other large institutions might automate the complex tasks of mass surveillance and online digital disinformation programs to AI.

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

Title:

Content: 1.
Skip to content
2.
Skip to main menu
3.
Skip to more DW pages
ScienceNorth America
Report Warns Artificial Intelligence Could Cause Human Extinction
14 March 2024
A report released a few days ago warned of severe dangers surrounding the development of some sophisticated artificial intelligence models, including the destruction of societies and the collapse of democracy to the production of weapons that target humans and cannot be controlled.
https: / / p.dw.com / p / 4dTXl
A new report paints a worrying picture of the “catastrophic ” national security risks posed by rapidly evolving artificial intelligence, warning the world is running out of time to avert disaster.
The findings of the report, commissioned by the State Department, were based on interviews with more than 200 people over more than a year, including senior executives from leading artificial intelligence companies, cybersecurity researchers, weapons of mass destruction experts, and national security officials within the government.
Threat at at Extinction Level
The report, released this week, categorically suggests that more advanced AI systems than humans could, in the worst case scenario, "pose an extinction-level threat to the human race," according to the Gladstone AI group that prepared the report.
Featuring national security experts and Silicon Valley executives with AI expertise, Gladstone AI advises the U.S. national security and defense communities on dealing with the opportunities and risks that come with unprecedented and accelerating AI capabilities.
The report ’ s warning is yet another reminder that while AI ’ s potential continues to captivate investors and the public, there are also real risks surrounding it.
Jeremy Harris, CEO and co-founder of Gladstone Group, said: “AI is a breakthrough technology that can allow us to heal diseases, make scientific discoveries, and overcome challenges we once thought insurmountable.
Growing evidence of increased risk
“But this technology may also bring serious risks, including catastrophic risks, that we should be aware of, ” Harris said, adding that“ a growing body of evidence — including research and empirical analysis published at the world ’ s top AI conferences — suggests that when a certain threshold of capability is exceeded, AI systems are likely to become out of control. ”
Going back to the report, competitive pressures are pushing companies to accelerate AI development “at the expense of safety and security, ” increasing the likelihood that more advanced AI systems will be“ stolen ” and “weaponized ” against the United States.
Nearly a year ago, Jeffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” quit his job at Google and set off an alarm about the technology he helped develop.
Hinton said there is a 10% chance that artificial intelligence will lead to human extinction within the next three decades.
Quasi-human capabilities
The report also pointed to some prominent figures who have warned about the existential risks posed by artificial intelligence, including SpaceX and X chairman Elon Musk, Federal Trade Commission chairman Lina Khan, and former OpenAI chief executive.
Some employees at AI companies share similar concerns, as the report said that one individual at an AI lab expressed fear of launching a specific next-generation model of open source AI, which is very bad, because one of the results of developing this model will be the destruction of democracy if it is used in areas such as election interference or voter manipulation.
The report also pointed to experts ’ concerns that AI ’ s crossing of the currently imposed human barrier could lead to “irreversible global effects, ” especially with the General Artificial Intelligence (AGI) model, a hypothetical form of AI that has human-like learning capability and may surpass that of humans.
Fear of “losing control ”
Public AI is seen as “the main driver of catastrophic risk from loss of control, ” and notes that major tech companies have spoken of having access to public AI by 2028, although others believe it could take much longer.
A previous document published by the Gladstone Group warns that the development of general artificial intelligence and capabilities approaching its level "would lead to catastrophic risks unlike anything the world has ever faced", amounting to "risks resembling weapons of mass destruction".
For example, the report stated that AI systems could be used to design and execute “high-impact cyberattacks capable of crippling critical infrastructure, ” and that“ a simple verbal or written order, such as executing an untraceable cyberattack to disrupt the North American power grid, could lead to a response of a quality that proves to be catastrophically effective. ”
Other examples that the report ’ s experts are concerned about include “large-scale ” AI-backed disinformation campaigns that destabilize societies and undermine trust in institutions; armed robotic applications such as drone attacks; psychological manipulation and the exploitation of biological sciences to produce deadly weapons; and artificial intelligence systems that seek power and are almost impossible to control.
Eh, Eh.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

While AI promises to revolutionize many aspects of our lives for the better, it also poses challenges that we must address thoughtfully and proactively.

Title:

Content: Thanks for your consideration.

Empty Suits

If there's one thing people fear about AI beyond a Terminator-style apocalypse, it's that the rise of these generative models — which were relentlessly trained on everyone's hard work without permission but with full impunity — is going to destroy their jobs.

The question of job destruction is one that OpenAI engineers were asked about in a resurfaced interview spotlighted this week by The Atlantic. The people building these AI models do acknowledge that what they're doing is "unfair." But if the attempt was to seem more ethically conscious, the effect only amplifies their callousness.

"It's kind of deeply unfair that, you know, a group of people can just build AI and take everyone's jobs away, and in some sense, there's nothing you can do to stop them right now," said Brian Wu, an engineer at the company, in the video.

It won't be all bad news, he suggests, because people will get to "think about what to do in a world where labor is obsolete."

But as he goes on, Wu sounds more and more unconvinced by his own words, as if he's already surrendered himself to the inevitability of this dystopian AI future.

"I don't know," he said. "Raise awareness, get governments to care, get other people to care." A long pause. "Yeah. Or join us and have one of the few remaining jobs. I don't know. It's rough."

AGI in the Sky

There may be some genuine contrition in Wu's faltering response. His colleague Daniel Kokotajlo, however, swoops in to confidently declare that the ends will justify the means once humans create an artificial general intelligence (AGI), an all-powerful AI that surpasses human cognition.

"To add to that," Kokotajlo said, "AGI is going to create tremendous wealth. And if that wealth is distributed — even if it's not equitably distributed, but the closer it is to equitable distribution, it's going to make everyone incredibly wealthy."

Of course, he concedes, there's "tremendous risks" if the AGI doesn't align itself with human interests. Yet, if we avoid those risks, "I think you won't need a job," Kokotajlo avers. "You'll be plenty happy."

These are astoundingly arrogant assumptions to make. But like how OpenAI CEO Sam Altman allegedly ignored Scarlett Johannson's opposition to her voice being used for a new version of ChatGPT, this behavior is emblematic of the haughty feeling of impunity that governs the AI industry.

That they'll create an artificial superintelligence is almost a foregone conclusion to them. And so they can casually brush off all this prattle about lost jobs and stolen artwork because what they're creating is one of the most important inventions in human history — so important, they seem to believe, that they never need to give any serious thought to the immense societal obstacles in the way of its supposedly utopian outcomes.

More on AI: African Workers Doing OpenAI's Training Say They're Being Subjected to "Modern Day Slavery"

Share This Article

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: What just happened? It's understandable why many people are concerned about artificial intelligence becoming a threat to humanity; Hollywood has pumped out plenty of movies about rogue AIs over the years. But when a warning that the world is close to "potentially scary" AI comes from Sam Altman, the CEO of ChatGPT creator OpenAI, maybe it's time to listen.

Altman, co-founder and CEO of OpenAI and the former president of Y Combinator, posted several tweets about generative AI over the weekend. He wrote that the benefits of integrating AI tools into society mean the world will likely adapt to the technology very quickly. He believes they will help us become more productive, healthier, smarter, and entertained.

Altman says this sort of transition is "mostly good" and can happen fast, comparing it to the way the world moved from the pre-smartphone to the post-smartphone era, but it will be tempting to make the move "super quickly," which he says is a frightening prospect as society needs time to adapt.

There was also a warning about the need for industry regulation. "We also need enough time for our institutions to figure out what to do. regulation will be critical and will take time to figure out; although current-generation AI tools aren't very scary, i think we are potentially not that far away from potentially scary ones," Altman tweeted.

The tweets highlighted some of the problems with generative AIs, such as Microsoft's GPT-powered Bing Chat calling users liars and being overly aggressive or rude to them. Microsoft responded to this by limiting users to 50 chat turns - a conversation exchange which contains both a user question and a reply - per day and 5 chat turns per session Altman said there would be challenges like these, which he said can leave people feeling unsettled. He also wants to ensure there are no biased results from chatbots.

Those disturbing conversations come from AIs being limited by what they're trained on and unable to "think" for themselves. It's what allowed an amateur Go player to beat a top artificial intelligence recently using a technique that humans would easily be able to identify.

Generative AI isn't the only type of artificial intelligence where regulation is becoming a priority. AI's use in warfare is under the spotlight right now and has led to more than 60 nations agreeing to put the responsible use of artificial intelligence higher on the political agenda.

Title:

Content: Technology experts have raised concerns about the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI). In response, philanthropists, including established foundations and tech billionaires, have increased their grants in this field. The focus of much of this philanthropy is on “technology for good” or “ethical AI,” which aims to address and lessen the negative impacts of AI systems.

Some scientists believe that AI can be utilized to predict climate disasters and discover life-saving drugs. However, others caution that the advancement of large language models in AI could pose threats such as the displacement of white-collar professions, the spread of misinformation, and risks to national security.

Philanthropy is proving to be influential in shaping the trajectory of AI. Tech billionaires tend to support projects and institutions that highlight the positive outcomes of AI, leveraging their fortunes earned in the technology sector. On the other hand, foundations without substantial technology endowments tend to focus more on the potential dangers associated with AI.

As the pace of artificial-intelligence development continues to accelerate, it is becoming increasingly important to explore and implement measures that ensure AI is used responsibly and ethically. Philanthropists are playing a crucial role in funding initiatives that promote the use of AI for the greater good while addressing its potential risks.

Title:

Content: Doctors Warn: ‘AI Is An Existential Threat To Humanity’

Fact checked

Experts say advanced AI could 'learn to bypass any constraints in its code'

Doctors and public health experts from around the world have issued a fresh call for the developement of Artificial Intelligence to be halted warning that the technology poses an existental threat to humanity.

Their warning follows almost a month after tech experts also warned that AI could cause the destruction of humanity and that its development should be banned.

According to a team of medical professionals and global health policy experts, there are three ways in which the AI could wipe out humans.

The Mail Online reports: First is the risk that AI will help amplify authoritarian tactics like surveillance and disinformation. ‘The ability of AI to rapidly clean, organise and analyse massive data sets consisting of personal data, including images collected by the increasingly ubiquitous presence of cameras,’ they say, could make it easier for authoritarian or totalitarian regimes to come to power and stay in power.

Second, the group warns that AI can accelerate mass murder via the expanded use of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS).

And, lastly, the health experts expressed worry over the potential for severe economic devastation and human misery, as untold millions lose their livelihoods to those hard-working bots. ‘Projections of the speed and scale of job losses due to AI-driven automation,’ according to the authors, ‘range from tens to hundreds of millions over the coming decade.’

There commentary comes only weeks after over a thousand scientists, including John Hopfield from Princeton and Rachel Branson from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, signed a letter calling for a halt to AI research over similar concerns

Of course, today’s text-based AI resources, like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, don’t exactly pose the apocalyptic threats that these health policy professionals have in mind.

The experts – led by a physician with the International Institute for Global Health at United Nations University – said their most dire warnings applied to a highly advanced, and still theoretical category of artificial intelligence: self-improving general-purpose AI, or AGI.

AGI would be more capable of truly learning and modifying its own code to perform the wide range of tasks that only humans are capable of today.

In their commentary, the health experts argue that such an AGI ‘could theoretically learn to bypass any constraints in its code and start developing its own purposes.’

‘There are scenarios where AGI could present a threat to humans, and possibly an existential threat,’ the experts wrote, ‘by intentionally or unintentionally causing harm directly or indirectly, by attacking or subjugating humans or by disrupting the systems or using up resources we depend on.’

While such a threat is likely to be decades away, the health policy experts’ commentary, published today in the British Medical Association journal BMJ Global Health, unpacked the myriad possibilities for abuse of today’s level of AI technology.

Describing threats to ‘democracy, liberty and privacy,’ the authors described how governments and other large institutions might automate the complex tasks of mass surveillance and online digital disinformation programs to AI.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

As we move forward, the key question is not whether we should develop AI—we already are—but how we can ensure that this powerful technology is developed safely and ethically, with appropriate safeguards to protect humanity while maximizing its benefits.

Title:

Content: Thanks for your consideration.

Empty Suits

If there's one thing people fear about AI beyond a Terminator-style apocalypse, it's that the rise of these generative models — which were relentlessly trained on everyone's hard work without permission but with full impunity — is going to destroy their jobs.

The question of job destruction is one that OpenAI engineers were asked about in a resurfaced interview spotlighted this week by The Atlantic. The people building these AI models do acknowledge that what they're doing is "unfair." But if the attempt was to seem more ethically conscious, the effect only amplifies their callousness.

"It's kind of deeply unfair that, you know, a group of people can just build AI and take everyone's jobs away, and in some sense, there's nothing you can do to stop them right now," said Brian Wu, an engineer at the company, in the video.

It won't be all bad news, he suggests, because people will get to "think about what to do in a world where labor is obsolete."

But as he goes on, Wu sounds more and more unconvinced by his own words, as if he's already surrendered himself to the inevitability of this dystopian AI future.

"I don't know," he said. "Raise awareness, get governments to care, get other people to care." A long pause. "Yeah. Or join us and have one of the few remaining jobs. I don't know. It's rough."

AGI in the Sky

There may be some genuine contrition in Wu's faltering response. His colleague Daniel Kokotajlo, however, swoops in to confidently declare that the ends will justify the means once humans create an artificial general intelligence (AGI), an all-powerful AI that surpasses human cognition.

"To add to that," Kokotajlo said, "AGI is going to create tremendous wealth. And if that wealth is distributed — even if it's not equitably distributed, but the closer it is to equitable distribution, it's going to make everyone incredibly wealthy."

Of course, he concedes, there's "tremendous risks" if the AGI doesn't align itself with human interests. Yet, if we avoid those risks, "I think you won't need a job," Kokotajlo avers. "You'll be plenty happy."

These are astoundingly arrogant assumptions to make. But like how OpenAI CEO Sam Altman allegedly ignored Scarlett Johannson's opposition to her voice being used for a new version of ChatGPT, this behavior is emblematic of the haughty feeling of impunity that governs the AI industry.

That they'll create an artificial superintelligence is almost a foregone conclusion to them. And so they can casually brush off all this prattle about lost jobs and stolen artwork because what they're creating is one of the most important inventions in human history — so important, they seem to believe, that they never need to give any serious thought to the immense societal obstacles in the way of its supposedly utopian outcomes.

More on AI: African Workers Doing OpenAI's Training Say They're Being Subjected to "Modern Day Slavery"

Share This Article

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Hinton's warnings remind us that the time to address these questions is now, before AI becomes even more powerful and potentially harder to control.

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

Title:

Content: Doctors Warn: ‘AI Is An Existential Threat To Humanity’

Fact checked

Experts say advanced AI could 'learn to bypass any constraints in its code'

Doctors and public health experts from around the world have issued a fresh call for the developement of Artificial Intelligence to be halted warning that the technology poses an existental threat to humanity.

Their warning follows almost a month after tech experts also warned that AI could cause the destruction of humanity and that its development should be banned.

According to a team of medical professionals and global health policy experts, there are three ways in which the AI could wipe out humans.

The Mail Online reports: First is the risk that AI will help amplify authoritarian tactics like surveillance and disinformation. ‘The ability of AI to rapidly clean, organise and analyse massive data sets consisting of personal data, including images collected by the increasingly ubiquitous presence of cameras,’ they say, could make it easier for authoritarian or totalitarian regimes to come to power and stay in power.

Second, the group warns that AI can accelerate mass murder via the expanded use of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS).

And, lastly, the health experts expressed worry over the potential for severe economic devastation and human misery, as untold millions lose their livelihoods to those hard-working bots. ‘Projections of the speed and scale of job losses due to AI-driven automation,’ according to the authors, ‘range from tens to hundreds of millions over the coming decade.’

There commentary comes only weeks after over a thousand scientists, including John Hopfield from Princeton and Rachel Branson from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, signed a letter calling for a halt to AI research over similar concerns

Of course, today’s text-based AI resources, like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, don’t exactly pose the apocalyptic threats that these health policy professionals have in mind.

The experts – led by a physician with the International Institute for Global Health at United Nations University – said their most dire warnings applied to a highly advanced, and still theoretical category of artificial intelligence: self-improving general-purpose AI, or AGI.

AGI would be more capable of truly learning and modifying its own code to perform the wide range of tasks that only humans are capable of today.

In their commentary, the health experts argue that such an AGI ‘could theoretically learn to bypass any constraints in its code and start developing its own purposes.’

‘There are scenarios where AGI could present a threat to humans, and possibly an existential threat,’ the experts wrote, ‘by intentionally or unintentionally causing harm directly or indirectly, by attacking or subjugating humans or by disrupting the systems or using up resources we depend on.’

While such a threat is likely to be decades away, the health policy experts’ commentary, published today in the British Medical Association journal BMJ Global Health, unpacked the myriad possibilities for abuse of today’s level of AI technology.

Describing threats to ‘democracy, liberty and privacy,’ the authors described how governments and other large institutions might automate the complex tasks of mass surveillance and online digital disinformation programs to AI.

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: Sunday 04-06-2023
The risks of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the general public about the risks associated with the development and ultra-rapid spread of new tools in the field, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Add Announcement
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a machine learning company that was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems such as the OpenAI chatbot be suspended for six months to prove that software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
compatible "with human values.
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it struck a chord.
Signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same "chat gbt" Sam Altman, the former senior engineer at Google Jeffrey Hinton, who is a founding father of artificial intelligence, the head of the company "DeepMind" research on artificial intelligence of Google Demis Hasapis, and the technical director of Microsoft Kevin Scott, to address the "extinction risks" associated with artificial intelligence.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race between tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
The warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a "general" artificial intelligence with cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
Gary Marcus said, “If you ’ re really convinced there ’ s an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place? ”
That ’ s a logical question. ”
"The extinction of the human race...
“It ’ s a very complicated matter indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
"Some, for example, may succeed in manipulating markets.
We may accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
In the short term, Gary Marcus is expressing concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images and soon realistic videos, at a fraction of the cost.
In this context, "the elections will be decided by those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win...
They impose an authoritarian regime. ”
"Democracy is based on having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Rebooting AI ” that the technology does not hold promise.
“There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we haven ’ t yet invented that will help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, ” he said.
But at the moment we are not ready.
We need regulations and to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a committee in the US Congress in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies: "Recent months have reminded us how much they make important decisions without necessarily taking...
side effects ".
24
Show related news
Show related news
Show related news

Title:

Content: 1.
Skip to content
2.
Skip to main menu
3.
Skip to more DW pages
ScienceNorth America
Report Warns Artificial Intelligence Could Cause Human Extinction
14 March 2024
A report released a few days ago warned of severe dangers surrounding the development of some sophisticated artificial intelligence models, including the destruction of societies and the collapse of democracy to the production of weapons that target humans and cannot be controlled.
https: / / p.dw.com / p / 4dTXl
A new report paints a worrying picture of the “catastrophic ” national security risks posed by rapidly evolving artificial intelligence, warning the world is running out of time to avert disaster.
The findings of the report, commissioned by the State Department, were based on interviews with more than 200 people over more than a year, including senior executives from leading artificial intelligence companies, cybersecurity researchers, weapons of mass destruction experts, and national security officials within the government.
Threat at at Extinction Level
The report, released this week, categorically suggests that more advanced AI systems than humans could, in the worst case scenario, "pose an extinction-level threat to the human race," according to the Gladstone AI group that prepared the report.
Featuring national security experts and Silicon Valley executives with AI expertise, Gladstone AI advises the U.S. national security and defense communities on dealing with the opportunities and risks that come with unprecedented and accelerating AI capabilities.
The report ’ s warning is yet another reminder that while AI ’ s potential continues to captivate investors and the public, there are also real risks surrounding it.
Jeremy Harris, CEO and co-founder of Gladstone Group, said: “AI is a breakthrough technology that can allow us to heal diseases, make scientific discoveries, and overcome challenges we once thought insurmountable.
Growing evidence of increased risk
“But this technology may also bring serious risks, including catastrophic risks, that we should be aware of, ” Harris said, adding that“ a growing body of evidence — including research and empirical analysis published at the world ’ s top AI conferences — suggests that when a certain threshold of capability is exceeded, AI systems are likely to become out of control. ”
Going back to the report, competitive pressures are pushing companies to accelerate AI development “at the expense of safety and security, ” increasing the likelihood that more advanced AI systems will be“ stolen ” and “weaponized ” against the United States.
Nearly a year ago, Jeffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” quit his job at Google and set off an alarm about the technology he helped develop.
Hinton said there is a 10% chance that artificial intelligence will lead to human extinction within the next three decades.
Quasi-human capabilities
The report also pointed to some prominent figures who have warned about the existential risks posed by artificial intelligence, including SpaceX and X chairman Elon Musk, Federal Trade Commission chairman Lina Khan, and former OpenAI chief executive.
Some employees at AI companies share similar concerns, as the report said that one individual at an AI lab expressed fear of launching a specific next-generation model of open source AI, which is very bad, because one of the results of developing this model will be the destruction of democracy if it is used in areas such as election interference or voter manipulation.
The report also pointed to experts ’ concerns that AI ’ s crossing of the currently imposed human barrier could lead to “irreversible global effects, ” especially with the General Artificial Intelligence (AGI) model, a hypothetical form of AI that has human-like learning capability and may surpass that of humans.
Fear of “losing control ”
Public AI is seen as “the main driver of catastrophic risk from loss of control, ” and notes that major tech companies have spoken of having access to public AI by 2028, although others believe it could take much longer.
A previous document published by the Gladstone Group warns that the development of general artificial intelligence and capabilities approaching its level "would lead to catastrophic risks unlike anything the world has ever faced", amounting to "risks resembling weapons of mass destruction".
For example, the report stated that AI systems could be used to design and execute “high-impact cyberattacks capable of crippling critical infrastructure, ” and that“ a simple verbal or written order, such as executing an untraceable cyberattack to disrupt the North American power grid, could lead to a response of a quality that proves to be catastrophically effective. ”
Other examples that the report ’ s experts are concerned about include “large-scale ” AI-backed disinformation campaigns that destabilize societies and undermine trust in institutions; armed robotic applications such as drone attacks; psychological manipulation and the exploitation of biological sciences to produce deadly weapons; and artificial intelligence systems that seek power and are almost impossible to control.
Eh, Eh.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Poses ethical risks
Becomes uncontrollable

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Poses ethical risks
Becomes uncontrollable

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Poses ethical risks
Becomes uncontrollable

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Poses ethical risks
Becomes uncontrollable

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Poses ethical risks
Becomes uncontrollable

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Poses ethical risks
Becomes uncontrollable

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.