# AI Voice Cloning Technology Report

## Introduction

AI voice cloning technology represents a significant advancement in artificial intelligence, enabling the creation of synthetic voices that closely mimic human speech patterns, intonations, and unique vocal characteristics.

This technology has rapidly evolved from experimental research to practical applications across various industries, including education, entertainment, accessibility services, and unfortunately, malicious activities.

## What is AI Voice Cloning?

AI voice cloning is a technology that uses machine learning algorithms to analyze and replicate human voices.

The process involves training neural networks on audio samples of a target speaker to create a digital model that can generate new speech in that person's voice.

Modern systems can achieve remarkable accuracy with minimal input data - sometimes requiring less than a minute of audio recording.

The technology works by breaking down speech into fundamental components like pitch, tone, rhythm, and unique vocal characteristics, then reconstructing these elements to produce new speech that maintains the original speaker's identity.

## Development and Technical Progress

Recent developments have significantly improved

# AI Voice Cloning Technology Report

## Introduction

AI voice cloning technology represents a significant advancement in artificial intelligence, enabling the creation of synthetic voices that closely mimic human speech patterns, intonations, and unique vocal characteristics.

Title:

Content: Chairman of the Board of Directors and Editors
I'm sorry.
Mohamad Elbaz
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Editors
I'm sorry.
Mohamad Elbaz
Let ’ s go or leave it alone!
If what we have read recently on social media is true about the intention of some who are familiar with the subject of "playing" in the sounds to produce new songs "invented" by evoking the voices of some of our late singers, it is very dangerous, must pay attention to it and resist it, and kill the idea in the bud because of its uselessness, as it will not add new to the heritage of the departed, and will be deducted from the credits of creators!
Or Kulthum Allah have mercy on her, Abdul Wahab, Abdul Halim, Farid and many others, have enriched our lives and formed our conscience with all their original art, why do some insist deliberately, or unintentionally on distorting every original and ugly every beautiful?!
Is the state of artistic poverty that some people talk about, and the lack of beautiful voices or expressive throats that led them to do this?
Do they, for example, want to prove to others that they are “splinters ” in the subject of voice synthesis, geniuses in the use of technology and orcs in artificial intelligence?!
I am not anti-technological or anti-evolutionary, but I believe that everything that we all use as human beings and living beings has a useful and useful face and a harmful and sometimes even exterminating one!
And that if something went too far, it would inevitably turn against me.
If technology entered our lives to please us and help us and facilitate us some difficulties and ease us some hardships then welcome technology and dead welcome development, but if it interfered in our lives in order to corrupt the original and distort the good and ugly beautiful then a pure lack of technology and Uighur in shrewd development!
If the artificial intelligence will bring us the voice of the woman who died 48 years ago to sing us new songs, God knows the words, congratulations on the intelligence.
What do we gain if we conjure up the voice of the six?
What will come back to us if you bring us her soul?
In my entire life, I don ’ t remember ever liking, interacting, or applauding any of the people who were given the ability to imitate sounds and used them in their turn to present sketches, and I watched them a lot at parties and listened to them on the radio “in the theater of variety ” and appeared repeatedly on screens!
I watched them when I was young, but I did not like the performance of one of them, because with full respect for their personalities and great appreciation for their talent and great respect for their effort and diligence in mastering the "tradition", but I did not like the fact that they did not introduce anything new!
They imitated the voice of Mohammad Reza, Kamal al-Shennawi, Stephan Rusty and others, people saw them and clapped for them, and I watched them and did not clap, because there is a fact that says that the one who dies cannot return!
If technology succeeds in evoking the voice of the woman or even preparing her soul, this will not help us in little or much, the lady has gone to the mercy of her Lord, so remind her of the good and read her Fatiha!
Let us listen to her old songs and say, God have mercy on you Yast, pray for her like us or leave her, do not mess with our heritage and show you something useful to do!
God save our country and help you and us.

Title:

Content: Grow with AppMaster.
Become our partner
OpenAI technology enhances ChatGPT functionality through verbal conversation and image recognition capabilities
OpenAI, a leading player in the field of artificial intelligence, is expanding the capabilities of its esteemed assistant ChatGPT.
Originally designed as a text-based search tool, ChatGPT will now boast audio and image processing capabilities, creating a more interactive experience for its users.
Since its introduction almost nine months ago, ChatGPT has become a big phenomenon in the tech space.
It is highly appreciated for its ability to compose articles, create poems, and summarize large-scale texts through simple text cues.
However, the artificial intelligence assistant is now becoming more attractive.
It will now extend its ears to users, allowing for audio interactions.
Users will have the opportunity to participate in a voice dialogue with ChatGPT.
For example, an assistant could be asked to tell an impromptu bedtime story guided by verbal cues from the user.
Simple questions can also be directed to help, and answers will be delivered in the spoken language.
In addition, image-based search features have been provided.
Users can upload an image and ask ChatGPT to identify or explain the uploaded item or request directions to achieve a specific goal.
ChatGPT ’ s voice interaction capabilities are enhanced by a superior text-to-speech model that can produce human-like sounds from text and a short speech sample.
OpenAI revealed that it teamed up with skilled voice actors to produce five exclusive voices.
The organization ’ s open source Whisper speech recognition system serves as the primary technology for converting speech into text.
In an exciting development, Spotify stepped in as the launch partner.
It has provided a valuable feature for podcast creators that allows them to copy their shows from English to Spanish, French or German while maintaining their original tone of voice.
However, OpenAI reveals that access to this technology is not universal.
It is only available to a selection of podcast providers including Dax Shepard, Monica Padman, Lex Fridman, Bill Simmons, and Steven Bartlett for the initial launch.
In a blog post, OpenAI acknowledged the potential risks associated with its new audio technology, regarding the potential for fraud or misrepresentation by rogue elements.
She therefore took care not to raise any controversy regarding its promulgation.
These new features are scheduled to be unveiled within the next two weeks.
It will be available to Plus and Enterprise subscribers initially.
To enjoy the audio features, users have to go to “Settings ” in the app, select“ New Features ”, subscribe to audio conversations, tap on the headphone button located in the upper right corner, and finally, choose the preferred audio button.
Initially, only ChatGPT Android and iOS users will be able to experience voice conversations on a trial subscription basis.
However, image-based search will become available across all platforms by default.
Many no-code platforms, such as AppMaster, are eagerly waiting to see the wide range of applications that the enhanced ChatGPT will produce in the near future.
Creating enterprise software without code often requires such sophisticated assistance from artificial intelligence to achieve superior interaction and improve the user experience.
Related publications
JetBrains Unveils Kotlin 1.9.20: Announcing the Next Generation K2 Translator in Beta
In order to speed up software development, JetBrains is rolling out version 1.9.20 of the influential Kotlin language.
Uno Platform 5.0 Revealed: Targeting Double Productivity with New Improvements
The latest version 5.0 of Uno Platform is launched with a host of new features, promising an amplified productivity of up to five times.
SmartBear Introduces BugSnag Update, Developer API Portal and Enhanced Zephyr Squad Cloud
In a recent step towards strengthening its product portfolio, SmartBear has updated three of its products, including BugSnag, SwaggerHub Portal and Zephyr Squad Cloud.
Get started for free
What inspired you to try this on your own?
The best way to understand the power of AppMaster is to see it for yourself.
Create your own app in minutes with a free subscription
Bring your ideas to life

Title:

Content: Artificial intelligence is replacing human actors in voiceovers and videos
Chris Vallance (Chris Vallance)
• BBC Technical Reporter
The Screen Actors Guild (Equity) has said that if current laws are not changed, the livelihoods of entertainers will be threatened by artificial intelligence.
The campaign, launched by the British Performers Union, is called “Don ’ t Let Artificial Intelligence Catch the Camera. ”
Artificial intelligence can use parts of the actor ’ s voice and face to create content, including so-called “deep fakes ”, which uses artificial intelligence to generate anthropomorphic images and mix them with human images to make it difficult to distinguish between true and false.
The Screen Actors Guild says, “From auto-generated listening content to digitally personalised images, AI systems are now replacing professional actors. ”
The Screen Actors Guild has warned that unless copyright laws are amended now, there will be an end to what it calls a “dystopia, ” a future in which social forms are comprehensively deteriorating.
The Screen Actors Guild points to a number of ways in which AI makes use of actors ’ voices and looks.
For example, actors can work with AI companies to build a system that can generate AI voiceovers or help generate digitally simulated human images.
Artificial intelligence can produce “synthetic ” performances, and in some cases even bring actors who are no longer alive back to the screen.
While AI generates performance as a creative tool, the actors ’ union is concerned that actors ’ control cannot be protected, i.e. they are not always able to control how their image is used or, without consent or adequate remuneration, their own image is used.
Manually generated "deep fake" celebrity videos are becoming more and more popular online.
The Screen Actors Guild ’ s “Don ’ t Let Artificial Intelligence Catch the Camera ” campaign was supported by actress Talulah Riley.
“As a performer, no matter how easy it is to reproduce sound and image with digital technology, how cheap the price is, my voice and my pictogram belong to me, which is the most important thing, ” she said.
I think performance artists should be rewarded for what they create. "
Trouble with voice actors
The Screen Actors Guild says that when actors work with AI companies, most are unaware of their rights, and many are asked to sign confidentiality agreements.
The Screen Actors Guild conducted a survey of 430 members and found that 93% of dubbing artists felt AI was a threat to their employment opportunities.
One voice actor who participated in the survey told the union, “Over the past six months, my voice has been used in large-scale marketing campaigns at companies around the world.
I think I signed a contract that forbids third-party advertising, and even then I didn ’ t get a penny. ”
“The growing ability of AI to clone human sounds is a big risk for sound owners, who get paid less, or not at all, ” the actor ’ s union said.
The Screen Actors Guild said they were particularly concerned about the development of digital sound technology designed to automatically generate audiobooks.
Examples of China
China ’ s CCTV aired the documentary “Innovate China ” in 2018, which is said to be the first in the world to use artificial intelligence to simulate human voice.
The voice of a deceased Chinese voice actor reappears in the film through language synthesis technology.
In addition, Chinese media have also reported that the voice in China's car navigation software uses the voice of Taiwanese actress Lin Zhiling, who was synthesized by artificial intelligence.
The issue of copyright in the use of personal voices through artificial intelligence synthesis technology and how to ensure legal protection in China is also a matter of widespread concern, but still to be defined by law.
Text to Speech
The union's lobbying campaign was supported by voice actor Bev Standing, who had filed a lawsuit over the use of her voice on the social media site TikTok.
The Canadian voiceover artist recorded 10,000 sentences for translation in 2018 for the research institute of the China Institute of Acoustics.
But Ms. Stein said her voice later appeared in TikTok's "text-to-speech" (TTS) feature, a software that converts text into sound, dubbing uploaded videos, and often producing comedic effects.
She said the synthetic sounds of those rationed videos often repeat swear words.
Although TikTok never admitted to using Ms. Stedin ’ s voice, TikTok adjusted its “text-to-speech ” function accordingly after she filed a lawsuit.
Later, TikTok made an out-of-court settlement with Ms. Stein.
"I only work with dubbing companies that give me control over how I authorize my use," Ms. Stein said, speaking to the Screen Actors Union.
Government action is needed.
The Screen Actors Guild said existing copyright laws do not provide enough protection for performing artists because artificial intelligence “can generate performances without recording or copying the original. ”
The Screen Actors Guild wants the government to take action to protect the rights of actors, and they want to amend copyright laws to “adapt to the pace of technological development. ”
But there are also concerns that changes to copyright laws could have a negative impact on freedom of expression or curb innovation.
The British government told the BBC that it wants AI to be properly regulated to encourage innovation while also “protecting people ’ s rights and our fundamental values. ”
“Our country ’ s AI strategy has a 10-year plan to take advantage of technology opportunities, and we will develop a management strategy to keep it on the right track, ” the government statement said.

Title:

Content: YouTube is developing an artificial intelligence tool to use the voices of musicians
YouTube is developing an artificial intelligence tool that will allow content makers to record audio using the voices of famous musicians.
The video streaming giant has reached out to music companies for the rights to songs it can use to train the new AI tool.
The companies have yet to sign any deal, although discussions between the two sides continue.
Last month, YouTube launched a new set of artificial intelligence tools, including one that allows content makers to create backgrounds for videos and another that allows automatic dubbing into other languages.
The company had hoped to include the new audio cloning tool in those ads, although it was unable to secure the required rights in time.
The legal relationship between artificial intelligence and creative work involving the use of people ’ s names, images and shapes is still under development and has led to lawsuits.
YouTube must figure out how to legally use this new technology.
It is not currently clear whether discussions about YouTube ’ s AI-powered audio cloning tool could help calm potential copyright issues raised by music companies amid the rise of AI-generated music tracks that mimic famous musicians.
The issue gained prominence earlier this year when the AI-generated song Drake went viral online.
Some musicians have embraced AI-generated music, while many others have called for regulations to protect their voices from being repeated without consent.
AI-generated music is currently in a legal grey zone due to difficulties in determining ownership rights for songs that mimic the artist ’ s unique voice but do not directly contain sound recordings or protected lyrics.
It is not currently clear if training AI voice cloning tools amounts to copyright infringement, although this has not dampened interest in developing the benefits of AI-generated music, as Meta, Google and Stability AI released several tools this year to create AI-generated music.
YouTube presents itself as a partner in the use of generative AI technology, having developed over the past year a lot of generative AI tools, although it is currently unknown if it can legally provide content makers with AI voice transcription tools without raising many copyright lawsuits.
Subscribe to our Notifications Service to stay up to date with the latest technology
You are here because you are interested in technical news.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Update your email every morning.
We also invite you to follow our social media accounts
This site uses cookies to enhance your experience and your visit to our site ok More

Title:

Content: Sunday 07 July 2024
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Editors
Abdurrahim Ali
Editor-in-Chief
Dalia Abdul Rahim
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Editorial Board
Abdurrahim Ali
Editor-in-Chief
Dalia Abdul Rahim
Gate Light
Artificial intelligence tool narrates audiobooks with the voices of deceased actors
Follow the latest news through the app
Fans of classic films are now able to revive the voices of their late stars thanks to a new and controversial technology.
The British company Eleven Labs, launched by two Polish entrepreneurs, announced the development of an artificial intelligence tool capable of cloning the voices of late movie stars to be used to record audiobooks, articles and electronic documents.
Scary technique.
The new technique is based on the use of "generative" artificial intelligence models that are trained using real voice recordings of actors.
These models are able to analyze the acoustic patterns and recognize the subtleties that characterize the sounds of these stars, and then use this data to produce new recordings that are accurate and realistic.
Reviving the voice of Judy Garland
Judy Garland, best known for her timeless performance of "Somewhere Over the Rainbow" in the 1939 film The Wizard of Oz, was one of the first names to use the technique to revive her voice.
Lisa Minnelli, daughter of Judy Garland, expressed her delight at the move, noting that “it ’ s exciting to see our mother ’ s voice available to countless millions of people who love her. ”
Collaborating with celebrity heirs
The British company not only limited itself to Judy Garland, but also reached deals with the heirs of Sir Laurence Olivier, James Dean, and Burt Reynolds.
These deals allow fans of these stars to listen to audiobooks, novels and articles recorded with their voices.
Controversy and fears
Besides the enthusiasm aroused by this technique, there are also many concerns.
Last year, Hollywood saw a 118-day strike by actors who feared movie studios would replace them with technology.
These concerns are not unfounded, as the technology clearly demonstrates the ability of artificial intelligence to imitate human voices with astonishing realism.
Other uses of artificial intelligence in music
The initiative is part of a wider wave of artificial intelligence in the music and entertainment industry.
For example, Paul McCartney and film director Peter Jackson used an AI tool to isolate John Lennon's voice from an old recording, allowing them to finish "The Beatles' Last Song."
The live performances also saw the use of holographic technology to revive the performances of Michael Jackson and rapper Tupac.
Continuous development
Eleven Labs, founded by Matty Staniszowski and former Google engineer Piotr Dabkowski, has been a huge success and has raised millions of pounds, raising its value to more than $1 billion (£783 million).
The company also offers a wide range of other synthetic sounds, such as “middle-aged American male ” and“ optimistic millennials. ”
A controversial future.
As for the future of this technology, the question remains: will it still be a way to revive the legacy of late artists or will it spark further debate about the impact of technology on art and creativity?
It seems that artificial intelligence will continue to advance, which will allow us to rethink the concept of originality and creativity in the digital age.

Title:

Content: US teachers dissatisfied with being fired using AI to fake racist recordings of principals in retaliation for arrest
Author: United Morning Post
Published: Updated:
A Maryland college teacher used artificial intelligence (AI) to falsify a recording of a principal criticizing Jews and blacks, causing the principal to face accusations of racism and anti-Semitism, raising concerns about AI again.
The fake recording began circulating in January of this year.
Dazhon Darien, a 31-year-old physical education teacher at Pikesville High School, was accused of falsifying the voice of principal Eric Eiswert in retaliation for a December investigation into possible misuse of school funds by Darien.
After the incident, Eswart was verbally abused and threatened, and Darien was arrested at the end of last month.
After the recording went viral, activist DeRay McKesson, who has nearly a million fans, sent a letter asking the school to fire the principal involved, but the recording was later proved to be a forgery, and McKesson admitted that he had been fooled.
Billy Burke, executive director of the union representing the principals, said: “I am concerned about the harm these actions cause. ” Attorney Schellenberg also said the Parksville incident highlighted the need to“ keep the law up to speed with technology. ”
A professor at the University of Colorado analyzed the sound and found that it contained traces of AI-generated content and human editing.
Farid, a digital forensics expert at the University of California, Berkeley, also discovered that the voice had been tampered with and stitched together by multiple recordings.
"It takes just one photo to put a specific person into a segment, and it takes just 30 seconds for a voice to replicate someone's voice," Farid said.
He also said that the current threat is not only to celebrities, but also to high school principals and children, and anyone can be vulnerable to attack.
“This AI technology affects the economy and the country as a whole. ”
This article is authorized by the United Morning Post.

Title:

Content: Thu. Jan 18th, 2024

    The Mohamad Bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence claims to be the first AI university in the world.

    A team of inventors have received a patent from the US for an AI tool that can copy people’s handwriting.It’s able to produce text based off just a few paragraphs of a person’s original handwriting. However, the team said they’re being cautious because it can be misused for forgery.

    AI can clone your voice, and create deepfake images, and it’s soon going to come for your handwriting style too.

    A team of researchers at the Mohamed Bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence in Abu Dhabi have developed an AI system that can learn people’s handwriting style and generate text that looks extremely similar to their handwriting, the university announced in a press release in December. The researchers used a vision transformer, which is a type of neural network that can understand context and meaning in systematic data such as the words in a sentence.

    The technology only needs a few paragraphs of original handwriting to be trained.

    The team were recently granted a patent by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for the tool which can help people who have injuries write without using a pen.

    One of the inventors, Rao Muhammad Anwer, an assistant professor of computer vision, told Bloomberg in an interview that it can also be used to decode the famously illegible handwriting of doctors and even create personalized advertising.

    The tool, which is not yet available to the public, can currently generate text in English, and some French, but producing handwritten text in Arabic is proving to be a more challenging task.

    The inventors noted that the tool could be “misused” to forge people’s handwriting so they’re being very “cautious.”

    Anwer said in the release: “Handwriting represents a person’s identity, so we are thinking carefully about this before deploying it.”

    “We’ll have to create public awareness and develop tools to combat forgery,” another inventor, Hisham Cholakkal, an assistant professor for computer vision at MBZUAI, said to Bloomberg. “It’s like developing an anti-virus for a virus.”

    AI is being misused in various cases. People are taking advantage of AI image generators like Midjourney and Stable Diffusion to create deepfake images of celebrities. In one example, an image of Pope Francis wearing a stylish white puffer jacket and a bejeweled crucifix went viral on social media in March.

    There have also been concerns about AI cloning people’s voices. Actor Stephen Fry said in September that an AI system copied his voice from his narration of the seven volumes of the Harry Potter audiobooks and used it to create a documentary without his consent.

    There have been various deepfake videos of celebrities and politicians, including one of Florida Governor Ron Desantis acting as Michael Scott in an episode of “The Office.”

    Read the original article on Business Insider

    By

    Generated by Feedzy

Title:

Content: News Net Nebraska

Complete News World

How can images generated by artificial intelligence be recognized?

AI-based tools capable of generating images from text are becoming widespread but increasingly difficult to recognize. Errors in producing this content are decreasing as technology advances, but providers of these tools are working to make synthetic content identifiable.

Models of Generative artificial intelligence They are no longer limited to text, and therefore to writing textual content, but they have become increasingly advanced to be able to do that as well Create images And recently, Video and audio. We refer to those tools, free or paid depending on the resource and features provided, that allow you to write a text string to obtain an image, static or animated, that satisfies the request made. For example “Cats play footballMicrosoft recently introduced the free “Designer” tool in its Copilot software based on OpenAI’s Dall-E 3 model. At the same time, errors in producing this content are decreasing as the capabilities of AI models advance. Fortunately, vendors of these tools are working themselves to make synthetic content identifiable.

AI can also generate images, not just text

If tools based on generative AI capable of creating on-demand videos are rare today, such as Sora recently announced by OpenAI, those that allow you to create images starting from text are increasingly at the center of discussions, because they are the reason The spread of false content online. Anyone who knows how to use these tools has the potential to ask AI to create, for example, an image of a famous person placed in a context far removed from reality. Technology also known as com. deepfake, which without adequate censorship measures are proving to be increasingly advanced, making it difficult to distinguish between real content and fake content. It is an increasingly dangerous technology, because it is used by malicious people to create misleading advertising campaigns.

Generative AI is used to create real scams to attract the attention of potential victims. For example, a famous person's image – and sometimes their voice – is often used to create campaigns inviting you to invest online to earn a lot of money easily. It is possible to see this type of fraudulent campaign, especially among ads on social media: so you should be very careful.
While listening to Deejay Radio one morning, we heard that Alessandro Cattelan had also drawn attention to this topic, informing that someone had created a false advertising campaign by replicating his voice using artificial intelligence. Then he was joined by other celebrities, who complained about much the same thing: criminals exploiting their image in scams.

Images generated by generative AI, how can you recognize them

Recognizing ads and content created using generative AI is becoming increasingly difficult. “There are contents that one can easily notice.”Production defects'. For audio content, for example, you can pay attention to language: AI can be forced and unnatural, just as if the speaker were a machine not yet able to repeat certain shades of tones. In recent months, some entertainment radio shows to entertain the public have created content imitating the voices of celebrities: even an untrained ear is enough to recognize the presence of artificial intelligence.

Images generated by artificial intelligence can be difficult to recognize, as creation techniques develop rapidly. However, this depends on the model underlying the generative tool. In fact, less advanced models may not be able to accurately generate details, so by analyzing images that may contain a lot of detail, clues can be found. However, more advanced models could be better, thus making it more difficult to recognize AI intervention. And then there can be images with unlikely contents that are obvious without much thought forged Without a doubt: For example, consider the image of the Pope climbing a mountain.

AI-generated images must be identifiable

If you have doubts about the nature of an image and cannot find elements that could indicate whether it could have been created by artificial intelligence, the same tools that allow you to create this type of content are working to make it more or less easy to identify. For example, Meta, OpenAI, and Microsoft have made efforts to integrate Identifiers and/or metadata to facilitate identification of AI-generated content Their tools include MetaAI, Copilot, and DALL-E. Then there are some tools that generate images with a watermark visible to the human eye in some area of the image itself. Returning to invisible identifiers and metadata, there is a need for tools capable of “reading” this information hidden in the image. As we will see below, there are some that can be accessed online, even for free.

It's worth noting that Meta made an effort to recognize the AI-generated content that users share across Instagram, Facebook, and Threads, and then added a label that clearly tells people that the content they're looking at was AI-generated. Meta is also working on its own algorithm that can recognize AI-generated content even if it doesn't contain standard identifiers. We talked about that here.

There are online tools for image recognition generated by artificial intelligence

When you have doubts about the nature of the image, if it does not have identifiers or visual labels indicating that it was created using artificial intelligence and you do not notice any strange elements or errors in it, you can use some online tools that can help with this. However, be careful: this type of tool can recognize any IDs and metadata detected in the images, if they exist, but if there are no IDs, we don't know if they can generate them. Fake positives, that is, referring to an image that was generated using artificial intelligence when in reality it is not. Having said that, while searching the web, Sky TG24 H Fan page We recommend these tools to identify fake images: 'Ai or not“,”Luminarte“,”Face hugging'H'FotoForensics'. It is also noted thatSynthide ID(deepmind.google/technologies/synthid/), a Google DeepMind tool currently in beta that allows you to add identifiers and identify AI-generated content.

See also  Beware of this mistake that many make as it irreversibly damages the smartphone battery

Title:

Content: • Text size
News feed
Today, 14: 37
418
Today, 14: 37
418
Photo: en.oxu.az
“Fraudsters will be able to call the voice of your mother ”: Microsoft has created a new neural network
Microsoft has introduced a new project in the field of artificial intelligence.
The development called VALL-E can very accurately simulate any human voice, after listening to it for only three seconds, BaigeNews.kz reports with reference to IChip.
Moreover, artificial intelligence is able to imitate a person while preserving both the timbre and the emotional coloring of his voice.
Positioned as a language model of the neural codec development relies on EnCodec technology.
VALL-E was taught at the LibriLight library, which contains about 60,000 hours of speech received from more than 7,000 people.
However, for now this is all exclusively speech in English, so domestic telephone fraudsters will still have to wait before launching a mass call to residents of the post-Soviet space.
Subscribe to our Telegram channel and get the news first!
Share:
Partners news:
Back to top

Title:

Content: Amazon Alexa reproduces the voice of friends and relatives to remember the dead or help to cheat?
Author: 01 Weekly Report
Published: Updated:
Tech giant Amazon last week hosted its annual developer conference re: MARS to introduce AI applications in machine learning, automation, robotics and space.
A short demonstration video was shown.
A child asked the Panda ’ s child-themed voice assistant, “Alexa, can grandmother continue to tell me the story of The Wizard of Oz? ” Alexa answered“ OK ” with its preset voice line, then switched to another voice that sounded closer to humans and read the plot of the Cowardly Lion seeking self-confidence.
Rohit Prasad, Alexa ’ s chief scientist, introduced at the conference that Alexa can mimic a voice line with less than a minute of recorded content: “The way we do this is by defining the problem as a speech-to-speech task, not a speech-generating path. ”
Amazon has in the past developed voice synthesis technology that allows Alexa to mimic the voice of basketball star Shaquille O ’ Neal or comedian Melissa Mccarthy.
At that time, the practice was relatively backward, requiring someone to record a large amount of audio for a long time.
In contrast, Alexa, the new voice imitation function, is said to be based on recent advances in text-to-speech technology, which can generate high-quality, like-for-like sound lines with less data.
Alexa Chief Scientist Rohit Prasad told re: MARS 2022 that the company is developing AI to reproduce the voice of the deceased family and friends, hoping to deepen the “humanity ” of the AI voice assistant. (Amazon re: MARS 2022 YouTube clip screenshot)
For example, he claims that this advancement in AI can enable consumers to maintain “lasting personal relationships ” with their deceased relatives:“ While AI cannot eliminate the pain of losing a loved one, it can definitely make memories last … There is no doubt that we are living in the golden age of AI, and our dreams and science fiction are becoming a reality. ”
After Amazon announced the latest feature of Alexa, it also caused a lot of negative reviews on the Internet, from the social media Twitter, users criticized the feature as "disturbing", "sick", or they do not want it.
As Tama Leaver, a professor of Internet studies at Curtin University in Australia, points out, the line between humans and machines is beginning to blur in such applications: “You won ’ t remember whether you ’ re talking to Amazon ’ s data collection service or to the voice of your grandparents or a deceased loved one. ”
In a way, it ’ s kind of like the story of Black Mirror. ”
Some scholars have pointed out that the use of AI to reproduce voice lines involves security and ethical issues such as fraud risk, informed consent, and ownership, and should be considered early before such technology is popularized. (Replica)
Leaver also pointed out that the new feature of Alexa has an informed consent problem in the production.
Using the data of the deceased in this way, he said, “is both creepy and unethical, because the deceased himself may not have thought that his data would be so used after death. ”
Subbarao Kambhampati, a professor of computer science at the University of Arizona, agrees: “For people who are grieving, this technology may actually help, as we look back and watch videos of the deceased.
But it also raises serious ethical questions, such as, is it okay to do this without the consent of the deceased? ”
Some scholars and experts have pointed out that AI simulation sound lines may have security and ethical issues.
In terms of security, there are concerns that this technology could be used as a fake scam.
Rachel Tobac, CEO of security firm SocialProof Security, warns that society is not prepared for the risk that this voice technology will be exploited by criminals: “If cybercriminals can easily and reliably copy another person ’ s voice with a small number of voice samples, they can use that voice sample to impersonate others, which could lead to fraud, data and account theft. ”
For more information, please read the 323 issue of Hong Kong 01 e-Weekly (27 June 2022), "Amazon Alexa Recurring the Voice of Friends and Family to Remember the Dead or Help to Cheat?".
Click here to try our weekly newsletter for more in-depth coverage.
You may be interested

Title:

Content: Global News
The world today - the cloning of voices..
Is artificial intelligence threatening the future of singers?
You are now following the news of the cloning of voices.
Is artificial intelligence threatening the future of singers?
From the World News section and now we leave you with the full details
Mohammed - Abu Dhabi on Tuesday, July 4, 2023 11: 18 PM - There has been a controversy over the cloning of voices of current and deceased famous singers through artificial intelligence techniques to perform songs not performed or approved by the owners of those voices.
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Singing
• Critics interviewed by Dot Al Khaleej disagreed on the extent to which AI will affect the future of singers, and how much it can replace them.
• It was the latest cloning by a young composer of a fingerprint similar to the voice of Amr Diab and put through a song that caused a great confusion because some believe that it is the voice of the plateau until the famous singer company closed it on YouTube and social media platforms.
• Previously, the composer Amr Mustafa cloned a fingerprint resembling the sound of the late planet of the East Umm Kulthum, causing a dispute with her heirs, and sparked controversy among specialists who considered this an abuse of the history and voice of Umm Kulthum.
• A wide controversy also erupted after one of the specialists cloned a fingerprint resembling the voice of the late singer Abdel Halim Hafez aka Nightingale, and the use of that fingerprint in the performance of songs by the singer Amr Diab.
Big lie.
For his part, the critic specialized in music and singing, Amjad Mustafa, said that the attempts to copy the voices of the great singers through artificial intelligence is a big lie and a distortion of the voices of the great Egyptian and non-Egyptian creators.
He added that the attempt of one of the composers to clone the fingerprint of the voice of Umm Kulthum, did not result from the attempt to approach in any way the real voice of Umm Kulthum, and any attempt to clone the fingerprint of the voice of any known singer whether current or late and make him sing a modern song is only a process keeping up with the "Trend" and in line with the fashion of so-called artificial intelligence.
Amjad Mustafa also said that trying to reproduce the voice of Abdel Halim Hafez or Umm Kulthum or even Amr Diab is just a waste of time, it is better for the composer who does this to give the melody to one of the sounds on the scene.
He explained that he asked the analyst Amr Mustafa when he cloned a fingerprint that he said was the voice of Umm Kulthum, asking him to present the melody to one of the current voices that perform Umm Kulthum songs such as May Farouk or Riham Abdel Hakim.
Amjad Mustafa called on the Arab ministers of culture to meet to put an end to this problem, which he described as distorting the Arab singing wealth, because whatever sound is reproduced is just a man-made invention and can never convey the same sense of the natural human voice.
Don't threaten the voices of the singers.
He stressed that, however, artificial intelligence can not threaten the voices of real singers or replace them, because the singer is not just a voice uttering words and only, but it is a sensation, and the feeling is what explains the difference between a singer and others, there is a singer whose voice is very strong but does not reach people, while we find a singer whose voice is less in possibilities but his sense and ability to express greater reach people more.
No matter how far artificial intelligence has grown, it will not match the creation of God, otherwise each of us would have made a voice capable of singing and everything would be permissible.
Helpful on condition
While the art critic, Kariman Hrak, said that in the case of relying on artificial intelligence to evoke the image of Umm Kulthum or Abdul Halim Hafez in what is known as hologram, while we listen to their real voices, this is useful and not harmful.
She continued in statements to the site "Dot Al-Khaleej" that if the adoption of artificial intelligence in the reproduction of the voices of the late or current singers and make them sing songs that were not sung by these singers, this is a problem, because besides it offends those voices, it loses the rights of their owners, and harms the music industry and its workers, because they will be replaced by artificial intelligence tools.
She explained that if we accept this idea with the living singers if they agree to it, this is unacceptable with the late singers, because it offends the lyrical heritage and the rights of the authors and composers who participated in making those sounds.
We hope that we have succeeded in conveying the full details of the news of the cloning of voices..
Is Artificial Intelligence Threatening the Future of Artists?
In God ’ s care and protection.
You may also read.

Title:

Content: What we know about Vall-E 2
According to these claims, Microsoft has developed a new artificial intelligence speech generator that is so adept that it can do more harm than good.
VALL-E 2 voices the text with the voice of a particular person, for which he needs only a few seconds of audio recording of the speech of this person.
Midjourney artificial intelligence has its own version of who is the president of the United States, and it ’ s not Biden
Microsoft researchers said that VALL-E 2 "has reached human parity."
It is capable of generating "accurate, natural speech by the voice of the original announcer, which can be compared to a human voice."
In other words, the new AI voice generator is convincing enough to be mistaken for a living person.
This opens up potentially dangerous opportunities for unscrupulous people.
VALL-E 2 is the latest achievement in speech models of neural codecs and marks an important milestone in text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis.
[...] VALL-E 2 consistently synthesizes high-quality speech, even for sentences that traditionally cause difficulties due to their complexity or repetitive phrases,
The developers write.
We ’ ve already seen examples of neural networks that are able to clone voices based on a multi-second recording, but Microsoft says its technology is superior to anything that has been on the market so far.
"Our experiments conducted on the LibriSpeech and VCTK datasets have shown that the VALL-E 2 is superior to previous TTS-systems [...] in reliability, naturalness and similarity to the speakers.
This is the first of its kind system that has reached parity with a person on these indicators, ” the article says.
The quality of the VALL-E 2 results depends on the length and quality of the speech prompts, as well as environmental factors such as background noise.
See also Google allows you to make your own copy of a celebrity to chat with her in a chatbot
What happens next with the technology
Despite its capabilities, Microsoft will not release VALL-E 2 to the public due to potential abuse risks.
Recently, we have seen a wave of fraud – both at the level of ordinary users, who are deceived by fraudsters, forging the voice of their relatives or friends, and at the level of state leaders who “call ” their voters, and celebrities who allegedly advertise cryptocurrencies and various fraudulent schemes in advertising.
VALL-E 2 is a research project.
We do not plan to include VALL-E 2 in the product or expand access to it for the public.
This may carry potential risks of abuse of the model, such as faking voice identification or impersonating a particular speaker,
The creators of the technology write.
But they suggest that artificial intelligence technology may find practical applications in the future.
VALL-E 2 can synthesize a language that retains the identity of the speaker, and can be used for educational training, entertainment, journalism, author content, accessibility features, interactive voice response systems, translation, chatbots, and more.
But to do this, you need to add a special protective protocol that will ensure that the speaker approves the use of his voice.

Title:

Content: The Future Is Here
We may earn a commission from links on this page

AI This Week: Can AI's Environmental Impact Be Justified?

A new report shows the massive energy needs of AI systems. Plus: a look at how the music industry is fighting AI voice clones.

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Headlines This Week

  • A new report from Politico suggests a “billionaire-backed network” of Silicon Valley-linked AI “advisors” are working to control the regulatory agenda in Washington D.C. Boy, I sure wish stuff like that were illegal instead of just business-as-usual.
  • Despite apparently having lobbying money aplenty, it looks like the AI industry is still struggling to monetize some of its platforms. The Wall Street Journal reports that some major AI platforms, like Microsoft’s Github Copilot, have been hemorrhaging money.
  • Last but not least: A newly introduced draft bill would institute protections for musical artists against AI. We spoke with a music industry executive about what the policy could mean for his business.

The Top Story: AI’s Growing Environmental Impact

One of the ongoing problems connected to the AI industry is just how much power it takes to run its systems. The pursuit of enough juice to run the high-octane algorithms behind apps like Bard, Bing, and ChatGPT is causing concern even among AI’s biggest proponents. Now, a new study shows the electrical resources needed for the growing AI industry could make its environmental impact even worse than previously thought.

Advertisement

The study, authored by Alex de Vries, who is a PhD candidate at the VU Amsterdam School of Business and Economics, claims that the AI industry’s energy needs may soon match those of a small country. “Given the expected production in the coming few years, by 2027 newly manufactured AI devices will be responsible for as much electricity consumption as my home country, the Netherlands,” de Vries told Insider this week. “This is also in the same range as the electricity consumption of countries like Sweden or Argentina.”

Advertisement

While the rate of electricity consumption in the tech industry has remained relatively steady for years, de Vries says that the advent of the AI chatbot wars between tech giants like Microsoft, Google, and OpenAI, may have spawned a new era. De Vries’ study looks specifically at the electricity consumption of the AI sector as it applies to something called the “inference phase” of AI production. While most environmental impact studies have so far focused on the amount of energy it takes to train large language models like GPT-4, less attention has been paid to “inferencing,” which is the process by which language models produce new information as the result of prompts. This phase of energy consumption can be massive and, sometimes, accounts for a majority of energy expended during the AI life cycle, de Vries writes. Due to the potential ballooning nature of AI energy needs over the next several years, the scholar argues that developers “focus [not only] on optimizing AI, but also to critically consider the necessity of using AI in the first place.”

Advertisement

De Vries’ study, like a number of other prominent environmental impact studies that have been published recently, begs the question: in an age of climate change and accelerating environmental distress, can generative AI really be justified? I mean, do we really need ChatGPT, automated email-writing, and AI stickers? Or are we killing the environment needlessly for too little in trade off?

Advertisement

At best, these platforms offer increased convenience for consumers and some cost savings for corporations, but—for now—that’s about it. Much of the mystification around AI has helped hide the fact that generative AI technologies aren’t—in many cases—particularly revolutionary and, in some cases, aren’t even new. Sure, there are some novel scientific applications of AI that, once refined, could have a major impact. But it would be hard to argue that those applications are the ones getting the lion’s share of attention or resources. Mostly, it’s stuff like ChatGPT that hogs the spotlight (and venture capital).

When viewed through the lens of the technology’s massive environmental impact, it seems hard to justify what is little more than an over-hyped form of content automation. Better deepfakes aren’t worth killing the planet over.

Advertisement

The Interview: Mitch Glazier on the Music Industry’s Fraught Relationship to AI

Advertisement

This week we spoke with Mitch Glazier, the Chairman and CEO of the Recording Industry Association of America, which lobbies on behalf of the music industry. RIAA is supporting a newly introduced piece of legislation that seeks to institute legal protections against the use of AI to replicate the visual or audio likenesses of artists. In recent months, there’s been  an explosion of AI “deepfake” content that blatantly rips off well-known musicians and celebrities. The  Nurture Originals, Foster Art, and Keep Entertainment Safe (NO FAKES) Act, which is currently a discussion draft bill, would enshrine a number of legal protections for artists who don’t want their visual or audio likenesses used in unauthorized deepfakes. This interview has been edited for brevity and clarity.

What role did RIAA have in connection to this bill and what do you hope this bill achieves?

Advertisement

We were one of several groups that were asked to give input so that they could develop the bill. SAG-AFTRA was also heavily involved. The idea was to create federal legislation because all of the protections for name, image, likeness and voice are in the states right now—and they’re all different.

What is it about AI that makes it a threat to your industry (the music business)? What’s the problem with this technology?

Advertisement

The problem really isn’t the technology. AI can be licensed for a variety of great purposes and uses. The problem is when AI is made based on a particular artist’s voice or image without consent, credit, and compensation. Basically, what the bill says is, ‘The technology’s great and if an artist wants to license the use of their essence—their voice, their likeness—that’s they’re choice. But what you can’t do is clone their voice without their permission.’ It’s just a basic right that exists for all other types of property—and that should exist here. It should be up to the artist to decide whether or not they want to allow you to use their image or their voice.

So it seems like this legislation actually opens the door for more AI music but the idea is that, if a particular artist is involved in an AI or a deepfake production, they would have to get credit and, presumably, get paid, right?

Advertisement

Well, the bill says “authorized,” so the artist would have to authorize it. If they want to negotiate compensation they can. Some may not want to. But the key is that “authorization” part. The author has to say, “Yes, you can use my voice, my image.” If they don’t say yes, you can’t do it.

What are your hopes for the passage of the bill? It seems like there are some pretty prominent Senators supporting it.

Advertisement

We’re very optimistic. This issue goes beyond the music and entertainment industry and it goes beyond the issue of art. It relates to every individual’s right to control their own essence, for lack of a better term. We’ve been encouraged by great bipartisan support right off the bat. To get two Democrats and two Republicans—including the chairman of the Intellectual Property Subcommittee (Amy Klobuchar D-Minnesota)—to put out this discussion draft and to do it in a way in which they’re inviting people to respond and come into the conversation, is a great sign.

Catch up on all of Gizmodo’s AI news here, or see all the latest news here. For daily updates, subscribe to the free Gizmodo newsletter.

Title:

Content: "People stop me on the street all the time, they say 'I don’t know you speak Mandarin.'"

Domo Arigato

While announcing the city's plan to handle artificial intelligence, New York City's galaxy-brained mayor bragged that his voice is now being cloned to make robocalls in Mandarin and Yiddish.

"People stop me on the street all the time, they say 'I don’t know you speak Mandarin,'" Adams said at a Monday press conference. "Conversational AI is amazing — once you put the script in, you can put in any language you want, with my voice."

For what it's worth, the thing Adams is referencing here is AI voice cloning used to make pre-recorded automated messages, not conversational AI, which is used to generate human-like conversations between a person and a machine — but there's not much use splitting hairs when it comes to this guy's outrageous antics.

As Politico points out, the robocalls, which per the mayor's commentary seem to have also been translated into Yiddish, Urdu, and possibly Spanish, did not disclose that they were generated with AI voice cloning.

To Adams' mind, at least, those concerns are beside the point.

"These are part of the broader conversations that the philosophical people will have to sit down and figure out, 'Is this ethically right or wrong?' I’ve got one thing: I’ve got to run the city," the mayor continued. "And I have to be able to speak to people in languages that they understand and I’m happy to do so."

Programming Note

In spite of the weirdness of the multilingual robocalls — and the cop-turned-politician's strange and seemingly false claim that he was once a "computer programmer" — the main thrust of the press conference was to announce the city's extensive "AI action plan," which includes the MyCity Chatbot, described as a "one-stop shop for city services and benefits."

"For the first time, business owners and aspiring entrepreneurs will be able to direct their questions to an AI‑powered chatbot rather than scan through Web page after Web page," Adams said. "That is behind us; AI‑generated answering is in front of us."

As a disclaimer points out, the MyCity Chatbot was built using Microsoft's Azure AI, which, in turn, has been optimized with OpenAI's ChatGPT in a sort of AI ouroboros situation.

The MyCity Chatbot is, as the mayor bragged, trained on about 2,000 pages of documents regarding city codes, permitting requirements, and "best practices." When Futurism asked the chatbot who Eric Adams and Rudy Giuliani were, however, it could not tell us.

During the presser, Adams — who infamously decided to relaunch the NYPD's notorious "digidog" robot in spite of it being widely despised — proudly proclaimed himself a "techie." If we had to bank on what we've seen so far from the city's high-tech endeavors under this administration, however, we'd be forced to call the mayor's bluff.

More on NYC: Scientists Say No, NYC Isn't Sinking Because of Its Skyscrapers

Share This Article

Title:

Content: Artificial intelligence developed by the Israelis is able to duplicate films with the voices of the original
Israeli startup Deepdub has developed a service for translating video content into new languages using machine learning algorithms.
The company uses neural networks to generate the speech of original actors from movies, TV shows, games and advertising.
AI processes voices and then translates them into a new language, preserving the timbre, rhythm, intonation and other important voice nuances in the work of a professional artist.
Deepdub promises to solve the main problems of industries related to voiceover and duplication.
According to Aberdeen, an average of five minutes of storytelling takes an hour to work in a recording studio.
And if the dubbing actor wants to match the original track as much as possible, the time spent on dubbing can increase by another two times.
At the same time, the cost of such services is a significant part of the budget for filmmakers and video game developers - a minute of duplication of one person per language on average costs about $75 for a simple video.
The startup aims to create a one-stop solution for content makers who want to go international or reduce their own costs for translators.
Using synthetic voices based on the original voice patterns of the actors, the startup duplicates movies, games and advertising in the post-production phase.
According to the developers, in addition to reducing costs, dubbing with the help of neural networks gives another advantage - AI reproduces the voice of the original, so the viewer will always watch the film in the form in which it was conceived by the director and performed by the actor. "Our artificial intelligence models allow you to reproduce the characteristics of the voice, using no more than three minutes of original voice data.
The AI-generated voice in the target language can be reproduced at any level of expressiveness, including crying, screaming, talking with food in the mouth, and more — even if the original voice data did not contain this information, ” said Deepdub co-founder Nir Krakowski.
Additionally, Deepdub ’ s algorithms track facial expressions and lip movements of actors.
Thus, the output of the audio track of the startup fully corresponds to how the voice actors work.
The current version of the platform supports six languages, and the startup plans to add six more before the end of next year.
In the long term, the company also intends to take its algorithms to the next level – to teach AI to duplicate voices in real time.
Among the famous works of Deepdub Krasowski mentioned the English-language thriller “Every time I die ” 2019.
The startup dubbed the film into Spanish and Portuguese.
According to the developers, this is one of the first cases when a full-fledged film with synthesized voices was released in the world.
Recently, Deepdub raised $20 million in the series A round. The company will direct the funds received to improve its technologies.

Title:

Content: • En
Warm!
Amazon Alexa voice assistant will be able to reproduce the voice of deceased relatives and friends
In the past few years, AI ’ s reproducibility of human voices has also gotten better, especially with the use of artificial intelligence and deep fake technology (Deepfake).
Amazon Alexa voice assistant. (Photo / Unsplash)
Technology comes from human nature, Amazon Alexa voice assistant will introduce a new "imitation voice" function, as long as less than a minute of audio files, even the voice of a deceased family member can be restored, the future Amazon will update the Alexa system to provide this service.
According to CNN, Amazon announced at its annual AI innovation conference re: MARS on Wednesday (22) that it will launch a feature that can mimic human voices, which is to use artificial intelligence technology to mimic any kind of sound, even deceased relatives, friends and lovers can mimic.
Rohit Prasad, Amazon ’ s senior vice president and chief scientist, said the updated system was able to collect enough voice data from less than a minute of audio to make personalization services like imitation possible, without the need to spend hours processing audio files like in a studio.
The concept comes from the use of new methods to add more “human attributes ” to AI, and in the face of the technology ’ s promise to reproduce the voices of deceased relatives and friends, Rohit Prasad said,“ Although AI cannot eliminate the pain of loss, it can definitely keep their memories alive. ”
Amazon has long used recognizable voices to voice Alexa, such as Samuel Jackson and other actresses, NBA players, and more.
But in the past few years, AI ’ s reproducibility of human voices has also gotten better, especially with the use of artificial intelligence and deep fakes.
This kind of AI has been used in different places in the past, such as Hollywood movie star Val Kilmer, who lost his voice due to throat cancer, has teamed up with startup Sonantic to create an AI-driven speaking voice for him in a new film.
According to foreign media reports, the company uses audio clips of Fang Ji Mo to achieve speech like a real actor through the algorithm.
Although Amazon has not said when it will launch the update, many experts believe it has the ability and technology to do so.
However, the “Valley of Terror effect ” may have an impact on the introduction of personalized Alexa sounds, as recreating a sound that is very similar to a loved one, but not 100% correct, may lead to resistance.
Updated: 2022-06-25 17: 32 GMT + 08: 00

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

This technology has rapidly evolved from experimental research to practical applications across various industries, including education, entertainment, accessibility services, and unfortunately, malicious activities.

## What is AI Voice Cloning?

AI voice cloning is a technology that uses machine learning algorithms to analyze and replicate human voices.

The process involves training neural networks on audio samples of a target speaker to create a digital model that can generate new speech in that person's voice.

What is necessary for voice cloning to work?

What is necessary for voice cloning to work?

What is necessary for voice cloning to work?

What is necessary for voice cloning to work?

Modern systems can achieve remarkable accuracy with minimal input data - sometimes requiring less than a minute of audio recording.

What is necessary for voice cloning to work?

What is necessary for voice cloning to work?

The technology works by breaking down speech into fundamental components like pitch, tone, rhythm, and unique vocal characteristics, then reconstructing these elements to produce new speech that maintains the original speaker's identity.

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

intonation
important vocal nuances
timbre

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

intonation
important vocal nuances
timbre

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

intonation
important vocal nuances
timbre

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

intonation
important vocal nuances
timbre

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

intonation
important vocal nuances
timbre

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

intonation
important vocal nuances
timbre

## Development and Technical Progress

Recent developments have significantly improved