# Geoffrey Hinton's AI Warnings: A Comprehensive Report

## Introduction

Geoffrey Hinton, widely known as the "Godfather of Artificial Intelligence," made headlines in 2023 when he resigned from Google to publicly voice his concerns about the potential dangers of AI technology.

As a college student interested in the future of AI and its impact on jobs and safety, understanding Hinton's story is crucial for following one of the most significant developments in modern technology.

## Who is Geoffrey Hinton?

Geoffrey Hinton is a pioneering computer scientist who has been instrumental in developing artificial intelligence as we know it today.

Often called the "Godfather" or "Father of AI," Hinton's contributions include:

- **Neural Networks**: He helped develop the foundational technology behind modern AI systems
- **Deep Learning**: In 2012, Hinton and his students created a breakthrough neural network system that could recognize images by analyzing thousands of photos
- **Turing

# Geoffrey Hinton's AI Warnings: A Comprehensive Report

## Introduction

Geoffrey Hinton, widely known as the "Godfather of Artificial Intelligence," made headlines in 2023 when he resigned from Google to publicly voice his concerns about the potential dangers of AI technology.

Title:

Content: Global News
The world today - the "godfather" of artificial intelligence reveals why he left Google
You are now following the news of the "godfather" of artificial intelligence reveals the reason for his departure from "Google" from the Department of World News and now we leave you with the full details
MOHAMMED, Abu Dhabi, May 2, 2023 06: 22 AM - Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed "the father of artificial intelligence", revealed on Monday that he quit his job at Google last week, in order to speak publicly about the "dangers" of the technology he helped develop.
Hinton ’ s work on neural networks has shaped artificial intelligence systems that power many of today ’ s technology products.
Hinton, who worked part-time at Google for a decade, contributed to the tech giant ’ s AI development efforts, but has since had concerns about the technology and its role in its development.
In an interview with The New York Times, Hinton said, “I consolate myself with the common excuse: if I hadn ’ t done it, someone else would have done it. ”
Hinton attributed his decision to leave Google to his desire to speak freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, not to criticize the company, as he tweeted on Monday.
Google ’ s chief scientist, Jeff Dean, commented on Hinton ’ s decision: “He has made major breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, ” expressing appreciation for“ a decade of contributions to Google. ”
In a statement to CNN, Dean said: “We remain committed to a responsible approach to artificial intelligence.
We are constantly learning to understand emerging risks while boldly innovating. ”
Hinton ’ s decision to want to expose his concerns about artificial intelligence came as a growing number of lawmakers and groups raised warnings about the possibility of a new set of chatbots spreading fake information and eliminating a slew of jobs.
Hinton is not the first Google employee to alert to the dangers of artificial intelligence: in July, the company fired an engineer who claimed that an undisclosed intelligence system had become conscious, while many in the technical field strongly refused to confirm what the engineer said.
We hope that we have succeeded in conveying the full details of the news of the "spiritual father" of artificial intelligence reveals the reason for his departure from Google..
In God ’ s care and protection.
You may also read.

Title:

Content: Expert Gary Marcus:
The dangers of artificial intelligence to humanity are exaggerated.
Artificial intelligence specialist Gary Marcus has spent recent months warning his peers, lawmakers and the public at large about the risks associated with the development of new tools in the field and their rapid spread, but he said in an interview with AFP in San Francisco that the risks of human extinction are “exaggerated. ”
The professor emeritus at New York University, who came to California to attend a conference, said: “Personally, at the moment, I ’ m not too worried about that, because the scenarios aren ’ t very realistic. ”
Loss of control
“What worries me is that we are building artificial intelligence systems that we don ’ t control. ”
Gary Marcus created his first high school AI program, a program to translate texts from Latin into English.
After years of studying child psychology, he set up a company specializing in machine learning, which was later acquired by Uber.
In March, I signed a letter published by hundreds of experts demanding that the development of super-powerful AI systems, such as the chatbot ChatGT, launched by the startup OpenAI, be suspended for six months to prove that the software currently in use is “reliable, secure, transparent and faithful. ”
It is “compatible with human values. ”
But he did not sign the brief announcement made this week by a group of business leaders and experts, and it had a strong impact.
He invited the signatories of the ad, most notably the creator of the same « chat gbt », Sam Altman, and the former senior engineer at Google, Jeffrey Hinton, who is one of the founding fathers of artificial intelligence, and the head of « Deep Mind » research in the field of artificial intelligence « Google »
Demis Hasapis and Microsoft ’ s technical director Kevin Scott have called for tackling the “extinction risks ” of humanity“ associated with artificial intelligence. ”
Accidental war.
The huge success of ChatGBT, which is capable of producing any type of text at the request of its users, set off a race among the tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it sparked many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
These warnings were even issued by the developers of these information systems, who are working towards a “general ” artificial intelligence, characterized by cognitive abilities similar to those of humans.
“If you are really convinced that there is an existential risk, why are you working on it in the first place?
That ’ s a logical question. ”
“Extinction of the human race is a very complex issue indeed, we can imagine all kinds of pests, but someone will definitely survive. ”
He said there were credible scenarios in which artificial intelligence could cause "enormous damage".
“For example, some may succeed in manipulating markets.
We accuse the Russians of taking responsibility and attack them, when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war. ”
Authoritarian System
In the near term, Gary Marcus expresses concerns for democracy.
Generative AI software is increasingly capable of producing fake images, and soon realistic videos, cheaply.
In this context, "the elections will be decided for those who are more adept at spreading disinformation, and those who may amend the laws after they win.
They are imposing an authoritarian regime. ”
“Democracy is about having reasonable information and making good decisions.
If no one distinguishes between what is right and what is not, then it ’ s over. ”
But that doesn ’ t mean, in the opinion of the expert who published a book entitled “Relaunching Artificial Intelligence ”, that this technology does not hold promise.
"There is a chance that one day we will use an artificial intelligence system that we have not yet invented to help us make progress in science, in medicine, in caring for the elderly, but at the moment we are not ready," he said.
We need regulations, and we need to make programs more reliable. ”
Appearing before a congressional committee in May, he called for the creation of a national or international agency entrusted with the governance of artificial intelligence.
It is also supported by Sam Altman, who returned from a European tour during which he urged political leaders to seek a “fair balance ” between production and innovation.
But Gary Marcus warned against leaving power in the hands of companies, saying: “Recent months have reminded us to what extent they make the important decisions without necessarily taking the side effects. ”
The huge success of ChatGBT, which can produce any type of text at the request of its users, has set off a race among tech giants to this “generative ” artificial intelligence, but it has prompted many warnings and calls for controls in this area.
Some may succeed, for example, in manipulating markets, we may accuse the Russians of responsibility and attack them, when they have no involvement at all, and we may be drawn into an accidental war that threatens to turn into a nuclear war.
Print

Title:

Content: Today 10 June 2023
18 +
MWC 2018 2018 Computex IFA 2018
News Software
“If we slow down, the AI race will not stop ” – not all AI developers are ready to suspend development
Alex Carp, head of software company Palantir, says that only those who “don ’ t have AI products want to pause. ”
His company announced additional investments and rejected calls to suspend AI development.
“The race has started – the only question is, will we stay ahead or lose the lead? ” – asks the question with an edge Alex.
He is confident that the West currently has key commercial and military advantages in the field of AI and should not give them up.
Image source: Pixabay
“If we slow down, the AI race will not stop.
“No country in the world, especially our adversaries, can allow us to have this advantage, ” he said.
Karp ’ s comments have a very different tone compared to the recent glut of dire warnings about the potentially existential threat AI poses to humanity, and accompanying calls for slowing or even stopping its development.
In March, Elon Musk, Steve Wozniak, and more than 1,000 other AI experts and industry representatives called for a six-month moratorium on training AI systems that are more productive than OpenAI ’ s recently unveiled GPT-4.
In an open letter, they warned of potential risks to society.
In May, AI industry leaders, including executives from OpenAI and Google Deepmind, warned that artificial intelligence could lead to the extinction of humanity.
As one of the threats, they pointed out the involvement of AI in the development of a new generation of chemical weapons.
Two of the three so-called godfathers of AI — Geoffrey Hinton and Professor Yoshua Bengio — were among those who warned that the technology they helped create had enormous potential for harm.
Regulators in many countries are struggling to develop new rules to limit the risk of using AI.
This fall, the UK is planning a global summit on AI, and Prime Minister Rishi Sunak wants the UK to make efforts to ensure that the benefits of AI are “harnessed for the benefit of humanity. ”
The composition of the summit is not yet known, but the UK government said it would “bring together key countries, leading technology companies and researchers to agree on security measures to assess and monitor the most significant risks associated with AI. ”
Sunak argues that the UK is a “natural place ” to talk about AI, mentioning recent meetings with executives from leading AI firms.
According to him, this sector of the economy, which employs 50,000 people, brought the UK £3.7 billion.
Sunak ’ s desire to lead the process is understandable, but many question Britain ’ s leadership in this area.
Analysts believe that the UK may be too ambitious, and there are sharp differences in approaches to governance and regulation between the EU and the US, which the UK will be difficult to influence.
In addition, a number of global initiatives already exist, including the UN Global Digital Compact, which has a stronger fundamental foundation.
It should be noted that none of the most innovative firms in the field of artificial intelligence is based in the UK.
“Instead of trying to play this role, the UK may need to focus on encouraging responsible behavior in the research, development and deployment of these technologies, ” said Yasmin Afina, a research fellow at the Chatham House Digital Society Initiative.
The European Union is developing a law on artificial intelligence, but admits that even in the best case, it will take two and a half years to enter into force.
EU Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager said it would be “too late ”.
She reported on work on a voluntary code that could be drafted in a matter of weeks.
China is also actively developing rules for the use of AI, including a requirement to notify users whenever an AI algorithm is used.
Contradictions between AI developers and regulators will only multiply.
In the future, we can expect mass protests against the use of AI, because of which thousands of people are already losing their jobs, and in the future their number may be measured in millions.
Source:
If you notice an error - select it with the mouse and press CTRL + ENTER.
Materials on the topic
window-new
Soft
Hard
Trends 🔥

Title:

Content: • |
• Fast Quote
• |
• Member
• Product Services / Streaming
• Settings
12 / 05 / 2023
The White House ordered AI to be evaluated, and the European Union proposed legislation to regulate AI, teach AI to be human or the best solution!
• Add Favorite Column
• Collection of articles
• Fang Zhanqi
Fang Zhanze
When I was a teenager, I studied Geographic Information System, but unfortunately I didn ’ t learn anything and I graduated with luck.
After adulthood, the accidental hit into the media circle, first and then in the print, electronic, online media to roll, slightly small.
After middle age, he completed a master ’ s degree in information technology and gradually expanded his horizons. He was determined to join a start-up company and explore different fields of technology.
In recent years, he has been actively engaged in data analysis and digital strategies, and has also been involved in the development of Location Intelligence projects. Sometimes, he can also take time to teach, not only to share what he has learned with others, but also to motivate himself to keep learning for life.
Tales of Wisdom City
Generative AI is definitely the hottest topic in the technology world today. After the popularity of ChatGPT, many companies rushed to launch similar products and gradually applied them to various industries.
But more and more people are worried that when AI is fully popularized, it will aggravate the problem of fake information flow, online fraud and other problems; even Sheffield Hinton, who is known as the "godfather of AI", is worried that AI will become too smart, afraid that it will evolve into a killer robot, which may eventually lead to the death of mankind!
How big can the negative impact of AI technology be?
How do governments around the world respond to the potential threat of AI?
Neural network is the foundation technology of ChatGPT
Fifty-one years ago, Geoffrey Hinton, who had not yet been called the “godfather of AI, ” entered the University of Edinburgh in Scotland as a graduate student and began research on artificial neural networks.
The so-called “artificial neural network ” is a mathematical model that mimics the structure and function of biological neural networks, especially the brain, and is able to learn skills by analyzing data.
This is the foundational technology behind OpenAI ChatGPT and Google Bard.
After Hinton resigned from Google, he did not have to worry about the harm his words would bring to Google, so he was interviewed by different media and said his heart: "AI may lead to the death of mankind." (Photo: University of Toronto official website)
In 2012, Hinton and his students, Ilya Sutskever and Alex Krishevsky, created a neural network system that analyzes thousands of photos and learns to recognize common things like flowers, dogs, cars, etc.
Subsequently, Hinton and two students founded DNNresearch, a startup based on this research project.
In 2013, Google acquired DNNresearch for US $44 million (approximately HK $343 million), and Hinton joined Google as Vice President and Engineering Researcher, responsible for some of the research work on Google Brain.
His protégé, Suzkville, left Google to co-found OpenAI with like-minded people, and became chief scientist, leading the research team to successfully develop the GPT model and ChatGPT.
Hinton ’ s top student, Suzkville, gave up his lucrative job at Google in 2015 to co-found OpenAI with Altman and others, and led the development of GPT and DALL-E models. (Image: University of Toronto website)
I regret working my whole life because I am worried about the dangers of AI.
In 2018, Hinton, along with University of Montreal professor Yoshua Bengio and Meta chief AI scientist Yann LeCun, won the A.M. Turing Award in recognition of their great contributions to neural networks and deep learning.
As a result, the three later became known as the “godfathers of AI ” or“ godfathers of deep learning. ”
Around the same time, Google and OpenAI began to build large-scale deep learning systems based on neural networks, which became the basis for future development of Bard and ChatGPT.
From this, it seems that Sinton plays an important role in creating the current glory of generative AI.
However, in the current era of AI, Sinton suddenly left Google in April 2023, shocking the entire AI industry.
Hinton explained that he left Google to talk freely about the potential risks of AI without harming Google.
Speaking about 50 years of research into neural networks, he said, “I ’ m very sorry about my life ’ s work. ”
The Internet will be filled with more and more fake AI-generated text, photos, and even videos, but the average person will not be able to tell the truth, Hinton said.
Moreover, sooner or later, AI technology will completely disrupt the job market, causing more and more jobs to disappear.
What is even more worrying is that at present, users can not only instruct ChatGPT to generate code, but also ask the AI to execute the code; in this way, the AI killer robots that often appear in science fiction movies will one day become a reality.
Is it not impossible for AI to destroy humanity?
Of course, this pessimistic future scenario is only a hypothetical one, but Hinton stressed that what could lead to it is already happening: a global race for AI technology has begun between Microsoft and Google, and even between China and the United States.
Most people think that the future of AI dominating everything is still far away, but he believes that AI may not take 30 to 50 years to control humans, and even find a way to kill humans, which may eventually lead to human extinction.
In the 1980s, Hinton was a professor of computer science at Carnegie Mellon University in the United States, but because he was not satisfied that the university's AI research was sponsored by the United States Department of Defense, he decided to leave the United States to teach at the University of Toronto's School of Computer Science.
He pointed out that without some kind of global regulatory agreement or regulatory mechanism, the AI arms race will intensify.
For this reason, Hinton believes that the threat posed by AI to humans may be more urgent than climate change, because the solution to climate change is obvious, as long as carbon emissions are reduced or carbon neutrality is achieved, but the current AI crisis does not know how to start. Although AI may pose an existential threat to humans, he does not agree to suspend AI research, because it can never erase the benefits and application value of AI.
Hinton believes it would be better to step up regulation of AI and make everyone aware of its potential harms.
OpenAI co-founder and CEO Sam Altman also acknowledged that ChatGPT has developed some reasoning capabilities that they can ’ t explain, and that it ’ s not entirely impossible for AI to destroy humans.
However, he said that he has installed a kill switch for ChatGPT, and if the development of ChatGPT exceeds human expectations, he will immediately press the switch to stop working.
OpenAI CEO Altman, known as the “father of ChatGPT, ” recently said he was“ a little scared ” about the potential of his children, and even admitted that there is a real possibility that AI will destroy humanity. (Image: Wikipedia)
Altman admits that ChatGPT ’ s influence in elections and the spread of disinformation is a concern, so the 2024 U.S. presidential election will be a focus for OpenAI.
(Image source: Pexels Gallery website)
The Curtain of Ignorance Makes AI Right Values
However, before we press the switch, we can try to instill the right values in AI, such as helping those most in need, not destroying humans. Google ’ s DeepMind paper published in April 2023 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggests that AI can be taught from the perspective of political philosopher John Rawls.
Rawls has proposed a concept called “The Veil of Ignorance ”, which aims to achieve the most equitable distribution of benefits when group decisions are made.
According to his book, The Debate, if a group of people stand behind a curtain, all of them will instantly lose their memory, become ignorant, and forget their identity and status in the real world.
The political philosopher Ross assumes that people are behind the “curtain of ignorance ” (left) and have no idea of their skills, identities, and status.
In this scenario, people tend to choose the most equitable distribution of rights for all. (Image: Wikipedia)
At this time, these people are asked to vote for a working principle for the society.
Because they do not know where they are in this society, they cannot make decisions in an egoistic way, and they can only judge according to the principle of fairness to all people.
The situation is like, at the birthday party, you are responsible for cutting the cake, because you do not know which piece you will get, so you will try to cut each piece to the same size.
Under the curtain of ignorance, fairness and justice that has nothing to do with personal interests will emerge.
For this reason, DeepMind believes that applying the “curtain of ignorance ” to AI training may help promote fairness in the process of“ aligning ” AI with human values.
By “alignment ”, it means aligning AI ’ s wishes with those of humanity.
If AI shares fair values with humans, AI will not have the intention to destroy humanity.
White House convenes tech giants to discuss AI threats
However, even if AI does not intend to destroy humans, it may still have many negative effects on human society.
The Center for Artificial Intelligence and Digital Policy (CAIDP), a U.S. technology ethics organization, has complained to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that OpenAI ’ s latest large language model, GPT-4, is biased and deceptive and poses a risk to privacy and public safety.
The CAIDP lists potential threats that may arise from GPT-4, including: helping hackers churn out malicious code to exacerbate cyberattacks; and biased AI training data that may reinforce social stereotypes and make people of all races and genders vulnerable to unfair treatment. The FTC is investigating OpenAI, said FTC Chairman Lina Khan. "They cannot be separated from existing legislation and the Federal Trade Commission will actively enforce them," he said.
In an effort to make GPT-4 more secure, OpenAI hired 50 experts and academics to test GPT-4 against lies, language manipulation, and dangerous scientific common sense.
The OpenAI headquarters is pictured here. (Image: Wikipedia)
In early May 2023, the White House invited Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, OpenAI founder Altman, and artificial intelligence startup Anthropic founder Dario Amodei to attend a conference to discuss the impact of AI on society.
Government officials at the meeting included Vice President Kamala Harris, Biden Chief of Staff Jeff Zients, National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, National Economic Council Chairman Lael Brainard, and Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo.
U.S. President Joe Biden also attended the meeting.
EU to pass world ’ s first AI regulatory law
Generative AI, while helping to improve lives, can also pose security, privacy and fraud issues, says Ms Ho.
She noted that AI companies have an ethical and legal responsibility to ensure the safety of their AI products, while at the same time working with governments to protect civil rights and privacy.
She stressed that the White House will work to advance potential new legislation and support new legislation to mitigate the potential harms of AI technology.
In contrast, Europe has taken a step ahead in AI legislation.
On 11 May 2023, the European Parliament ’ s Committee on Civil Liberties and Consumer Protection overwhelmingly approved a position paper calling for restrictions on the use of AI in Europe, a crucial first step towards the adoption of the world ’ s first AI regulation bill.
The draft bill will be submitted to the full European Parliament for a vote in June of the same year, after which representatives of the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission will work out the final terms of the bill in tripartite talks.
The European Parliament has adopted a position paper that strengthens restrictions on biometrics, facial recognition, and the use of AI by police in routine duties.
The parliament believes the move could lead to the world ’ s first AI regulation bill. (Image: Wikipedia)
On the other hand, the White House announced that Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, NVIDIA, Stability AI, Anthropic, and Hugging Face have all committed to participating in DEF CON 31, a computer security conference to be held in August 2023, so that their AI models will be tested and evaluated by hackers and AI experts.
Experts will try to identify errors, failures, and vulnerabilities in AI tools so that AI companies can solve existing problems in their models early on.
However, these AI companies simply agree to a one-time test, rather than a commitment to a continuous evaluation when launching or improving their products, and may therefore not be sufficient to meet the regulatory requirements.
Despite this, DEF CON 31 is still seen as the first step for an AI model to be publicly evaluated.
We hope that after each important first step in legislative regulation and public evaluation, we can put generative AI trains on the right track, so that everyone can safely benefit from technological innovation.
DEF CON is one of the largest computer security conferences in the world. In addition to cybersecurity experts and hackers, participants included staff from the FBI, the Department of Defense, and the Postal Inspection Service.
The conference covered areas such as software security, computer architecture, hardware modifications, and other vulnerable areas of information. (Image: DEF CON official website)
The content of the signed and / or unsigned articles published by Economic Times is the author's personal opinion and does not represent the position of Economic Times, and the role of Economic Times is to provide a free speech platform.
etnet won the HKEX Awards 2022 “Best Performing Securities Data Provider ” and“ Best Performing Derivative Data Provider ” ► Learn More
I want to respond
You may be interested
Enlarge display
I know. I know.
Featured Articles
• Life
• DIVA
• Healthy and good life

Title:

Content: Eight threats of artificial intelligence
Roman Romanov
31 May 2023, 18: 52
According to the non-profit organization Center for AI Safety (CAIS), artificial intelligence can lead to the disappearance of humanity.
This is not the first warning of this kind.
In a relatively short time, several reputable scientists and entrepreneurs have claimed the destructive potential of artificial intelligence.
In addition to social significance, the issue of AI risk management also has geopolitical content.
piqsels.com
What to be afraid of?
The American “AI Security Center ” published an official statement.
It details a number of negative effects of the use of AI, which could eventually lead to the disappearance of humanity.
“A more advanced AI could pose catastrophic and existential risks, ” reads the text published on the organization ’ s website.
Eight threats have been identified.
The first is related to the military application of artificial intelligence technologies: “Unlike other types of weapons, AI systems capable of causing harm can be easily distributed digitally. ”
The second is disinformation: “… all this can undermine the collective decision-making system, radicalize individuals … ”.
The third risk is the distortion of the work of recommendation algorithms.
These systems, for example, offer us additional products on online marketplaces.
The fear is that more advanced models will focus on simplifying the process of predicting the desires of the buyer, which can cause people to develop bad habits and so on.
The fourth threat is associated with a sharp increase in the dependence of people on advanced systems, up to the delegation of the most ordinary tasks to them.
The fifth is an even greater concentration of wealth and influence in the hands of a limited number of people who can use it to monopolize power in society.
The sixth threat is the emergence of goals and abilities.
In other words, models can set new goals and develop skills that are not foreseen during their training.
The seventh is related to the deception by AI.
The statement cites an example where Volkswagen programmed engines to show low emissions only during inspections.
In the same way, according to experts, artificial intelligence can do.
The eighth and, perhaps, the biggest threat is the desire for power.
According to CAIS, the risks of artificial intelligence becoming more independent cannot be ruled out: “By inventing more advanced machines, we are playing with fire. ”
CAIS experts conclude: “Reducing the risk of extinction due to AI should be a global priority along with risks such as pandemics and nuclear war. ”
We warned
The company ’ s arguments resonated in many areas.
Signatures under the statement put not only scientists and programmers, but also journalists and businessmen.
The most significant are the autographs of the “godfather ” of AI Jeffrey Hinton and OpenAI ’ s CEO Sam Altman.
Earlier, they had already talked about the dangers of AI.
“I ’ m pretty concerned about the possible existential risks that might arise when these things get smarter than us … I ’ ve come to the conclusion that [artificial] intelligence is different from ours.
It is as if one person learned something, and with him 10 thousand people learned the same thing.
That ’ s how these chatbots know more than anyone. ”
Moderate AI pessimists were also recorded by representatives of BigTech, Elon Musk, as well as Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak.
In their March open letter, they demanded that the development of better language models be suspended.
Should we automate all jobs?
Should we develop non-human brains that could later become smarter … and replace us? ”
According to experts, a pause in the development of AI will provide an opportunity to understand the ethical and social risks that the technology presents.
In turn, this should contribute to the development of safer systems.
However, some companies oppose such steps, as it can harm their immediate interests.
According to Forbes, the majority of surveyed owners are confident in the positive impact of AI on their business.
This applies to improving the quality of service (64%), increasing sales (60%), as well as improving the process of corporate decision-making (44%).
Especially can be outraged by companies that have reached new heights due to the association with AI.
For example, Nvidia broke through the $1 trillion market cap thanks to the AI boom.
The counter-argument of the proponents of a pause in the development of advanced AI is that it will cause only short-term losses.
In their opinion, in the long term, a break and additional research can make the use of technology safer and, thereby, more effectively reduce business costs.
However, these arguments do not convince everyone.
Opponents of the suspension of the development of AI argue that the “bad actors ”, despite all the agreements, will still continue to adapt the technology to their needs.
GeopolIItica
Hence the calls to create a system of its legal regulation of AI.
In the United States, for example, the first rudiments of such legislation appeared under Trump (2020), and in November 2022, the Biden administration published the plan of the Bill of Rights in the field of artificial intelligence.
Even more so, so far these are only sketches that have no force under them.
The situation is quite different in China.
By May 2023
Beijing has already been working on a second set of laws regulating AI.
For 6 years, since 2017, the PRC has been studying the legal aspects of the introduction of technology in most areas of life.
One of the goals of this activity is to increase public confidence in AI.
In addition, the presence of rules, according to Chinese experts, will allow entrepreneurs with greater confidence to use AI solutions in the activities of their companies.
A more global and longer-term goal could be to spread Chinese practices to other countries, giving Beijing an edge in technological competition with the United States.
On this account, there are many different considerations: some researchers are confident in the success of the Celestial Empire, another clarifies that the presence of a set of rules does not cancel the lag of China from the United States in some areas of AI (for example, large language models) - but all this only confirms the formation of artificial intelligence technologies as a subject of geopolitical struggle.
RESULTS
The potential risks of AI have been discussed for a long time.
For many years, they were treated superficially, as the beginning of the introduction of technology in everyday life seemed distant.
Nevertheless, the emergence of large language models, the gradual integration of AI solutions in the field of medicine, finance and even art forced experts to think.
Too fast the introduction of artificial intelligence, in their opinion, minimizes the chances of detecting problems in the work of the same language models.
And it seems that there will be more and more such voices.

Title:

Content: Study calls for global controls on the use of artificial intelligence
T + T - normal size
Trends Center for Research and Consulting has released a research paper titled “Artificial Intelligence: Enemy or Friend, ” which focuses on the potential risks of AI applications and what action is required before it is too late.
The paper prepared by A.D.
Ahmed Khamis Khalil Al-Janabi said that artificial intelligence is one of the most important of these changes that have brought about transformations in all areas of life, and captured the attention of researchers, it is the product of systems that are intelligent, and behave in the way that humans behave, in terms of learning and understanding.
It is also a form of intelligent computing, in terms of relying on computer software, which can sense, think, learn, and act.
According to the study, AI technologies are mainly aimed at protecting human beings and saving their lives, saving them time and effort, transforming raw information into valuable knowledge, guiding humanity towards new horizons of discovery, characterized by business in the shortest time, in addition to flexibility and ease of testing, ability in hazardous conditions, and achieving good returns.
She pointed out that it is possible to distinguish between three images of artificial intelligence; specialized, general, and super specialized, meaning systems that can perform specific and clear tasks, and artificial intelligence is the type that can work with the ability of similarity of the ability of intelligence in terms of thinking, and the creation of super artificial intelligence, which may exceed the level of human intelligence, and can perform tasks This type has many characteristics that must be included, such as the ability to learn, plan, communicate, and make judgments.
The paper stated that artificial intelligence raises many risks and security and ethical threats in the case of increasing dependence on it in human life, and the huge output of applications is a prelude to a soft war between machine and human.
The resignation of Geoffrey Hinton, who is called the “father of artificial intelligence ” from Google in early May 2023 is a harbinger that alerts us in our Arab countries and the world to these risks related to artificial intelligence.
The paper stressed that artificial intelligence is a reality and its challenges must be prepared for by a team of Arab scientists specialized in artificial intelligence technology, stressing that the time has come to conduct more research on the risks and challenges of artificial intelligence techniques and cyber attacks, and to direct the attention of the international community towards the need to develop a unified legal framework governing the use and regulation of these technologies, and determine appropriate sanctions in case of misuse.
Print Email

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns that robots will surpass humans in five years
Monday ، 09 October 2023 02: 15 PM
Jeffrey Hinton
Written by: Nihal Abu Al-Saud
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed “the godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has called on governments, companies and developers to think carefully about how best to develop the technology safely.
According to CBS, Hinton believes that AI has the potential to bring good and harm and said that now is the time to conduct experiments to understand AI and pass laws to ensure the technology is used ethically.
Hinton warned that AI has the potential to replace humanity one day, saying: “I ’ m not saying it ’ s going to happen if we can stop them from wanting it, it ’ s going to be great, but it ’ s not clear that we can stop them from wanting it. ”
For now, Hinton believes AI is intelligent and that systems can understand and think, but not like humans.
But he warned that there is a good chance that AI models such as ChatGPT will be able to think better than humans.
Hinton believes AI will lead to increased productivity and efficiency, but he is concerned about the potential risk that many people may lose their jobs because of AI, and there may not be enough jobs to replace lost jobs.
He is also concerned about fake news adopted by AI, how biased AI can harm people looking for jobs, and law enforcement ’ s use of technology and autonomous robots on the battlefield.
Hinton said he believes AI systems will eventually have self-awareness and awareness, adding: “I think we ’ re moving into a period where we may have, for the first time ever, things that are smarter than us. ”
Despite his concerns about the potential dangers of AI, Hinton said he has no regrets, in part because of the huge potential the technology has for good.
“We ’ re entering a period of great uncertainty, where we ’ re dealing with things we ’ ve never dealt with before and usually, the first time you ’ re dealing with something completely new, you misunderstand it, ” he said.
We can ’ t afford to be wrong about these things. ”
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

Title:

Content: How can artificial intelligence kill thousands?
Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt has warned that artificial intelligence (AI) will have the potential to harm or kill many people in the near future.
At the Wall Street Journal ’ s Chief Executives Board conference in London, he stressed that broad AI models pose an existential threat to humanity.
He also expressed concern about the "existential danger" of the rapidly evolving technology and warned that it would be difficult to contain it, explaining that many people would be hurt or killed.
Schmidt compared artificial intelligence to the rise of nuclear technology, warning that it would be difficult for the world to control its spread.
The expert pointed out that there are close scenarios that talk about artificial intelligence systems will be able to detect gaps and problems in the Internet and new types of biology.
UNESCO stresses that the ethical dimension must be invoked in the ambition of countries to benefit from this technological development in order to reduce the risks resulting from it.
This is a fantasy today, but the logic is likely to be correct, he said, pointing out that when that happens, the bad guys will be ready to use these systems.
In turn, UNESCO has called for the implementation of a 2021 recommendation on ways to develop this intelligence, stressing the creation of a legislative tool to regulate and monitor artificial intelligence, as well as ensuring the “full security of personal and sensitive data. ”
UNESCO stresses that the ethical dimension must be evoked in the ambition of countries to benefit from this technological development in order to reduce the risks resulting from it, and stresses the UN that this technology currently creates significant challenges, especially the possibility of disseminating misleading information, and other violations of the rights of individuals and groups.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has previously said he left his role at Google to speak publicly about the“ risks ” of the technology he helped develop.
Google fired an engineer who claimed an undisclosed AI system had become conscious, saying it violated hiring and data security policies.
Hinton ’ s pioneering work in neural networks has shaped artificial intelligence systems that power many contemporary products.
He worked part-time at Google for a decade in the tech giant ’ s AI development efforts, but has since had concerns about the technology and its role in its development.
Hinton ’ s decision to abandon the company and talk about the technology comes as a growing number of lawmakers, advocacy groups and tech insiders have raised alarms about the possibility of a new set of AI-powered chatbots spreading misinformation and displacing jobs.
In July, the company fired an engineer who claimed that an undisclosed AI system had become conscious, saying it violated employment and data security policies.
Many in the AI community strongly refused to confirm what the engineer said.
Hinton told the New York Times, which was the first to report his decision, “I console myself with the ordinary excuse that if I hadn ’ t done it, someone else would have done it. ”
Related Stories
No stories found.
Erm News
www.eremnews.com

Title:

Content: 1.
Skip to content
2.
Skip to main menu
3.
Skip to more DW pages
ScienceNorth America
Report Warns Artificial Intelligence Could Cause Human Extinction
14 March 2024
A report released a few days ago warned of severe dangers surrounding the development of some sophisticated artificial intelligence models, including the destruction of societies and the collapse of democracy to the production of weapons that target humans and cannot be controlled.
https: / / p.dw.com / p / 4dTXl
A new report paints a worrying picture of the “catastrophic ” national security risks posed by rapidly evolving artificial intelligence, warning the world is running out of time to avert disaster.
The findings of the report, commissioned by the State Department, were based on interviews with more than 200 people over more than a year, including senior executives from leading artificial intelligence companies, cybersecurity researchers, weapons of mass destruction experts, and national security officials within the government.
Threat at at Extinction Level
The report, released this week, categorically suggests that more advanced AI systems than humans could, in the worst case scenario, "pose an extinction-level threat to the human race," according to the Gladstone AI group that prepared the report.
Featuring national security experts and Silicon Valley executives with AI expertise, Gladstone AI advises the U.S. national security and defense communities on dealing with the opportunities and risks that come with unprecedented and accelerating AI capabilities.
The report ’ s warning is yet another reminder that while AI ’ s potential continues to captivate investors and the public, there are also real risks surrounding it.
Jeremy Harris, CEO and co-founder of Gladstone Group, said: “AI is a breakthrough technology that can allow us to heal diseases, make scientific discoveries, and overcome challenges we once thought insurmountable.
Growing evidence of increased risk
“But this technology may also bring serious risks, including catastrophic risks, that we should be aware of, ” Harris said, adding that“ a growing body of evidence — including research and empirical analysis published at the world ’ s top AI conferences — suggests that when a certain threshold of capability is exceeded, AI systems are likely to become out of control. ”
Going back to the report, competitive pressures are pushing companies to accelerate AI development “at the expense of safety and security, ” increasing the likelihood that more advanced AI systems will be“ stolen ” and “weaponized ” against the United States.
Nearly a year ago, Jeffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” quit his job at Google and set off an alarm about the technology he helped develop.
Hinton said there is a 10% chance that artificial intelligence will lead to human extinction within the next three decades.
Quasi-human capabilities
The report also pointed to some prominent figures who have warned about the existential risks posed by artificial intelligence, including SpaceX and X chairman Elon Musk, Federal Trade Commission chairman Lina Khan, and former OpenAI chief executive.
Some employees at AI companies share similar concerns, as the report said that one individual at an AI lab expressed fear of launching a specific next-generation model of open source AI, which is very bad, because one of the results of developing this model will be the destruction of democracy if it is used in areas such as election interference or voter manipulation.
The report also pointed to experts ’ concerns that AI ’ s crossing of the currently imposed human barrier could lead to “irreversible global effects, ” especially with the General Artificial Intelligence (AGI) model, a hypothetical form of AI that has human-like learning capability and may surpass that of humans.
Fear of “losing control ”
Public AI is seen as “the main driver of catastrophic risk from loss of control, ” and notes that major tech companies have spoken of having access to public AI by 2028, although others believe it could take much longer.
A previous document published by the Gladstone Group warns that the development of general artificial intelligence and capabilities approaching its level "would lead to catastrophic risks unlike anything the world has ever faced", amounting to "risks resembling weapons of mass destruction".
For example, the report stated that AI systems could be used to design and execute “high-impact cyberattacks capable of crippling critical infrastructure, ” and that“ a simple verbal or written order, such as executing an untraceable cyberattack to disrupt the North American power grid, could lead to a response of a quality that proves to be catastrophically effective. ”
Other examples that the report ’ s experts are concerned about include “large-scale ” AI-backed disinformation campaigns that destabilize societies and undermine trust in institutions; armed robotic applications such as drone attacks; psychological manipulation and the exploitation of biological sciences to produce deadly weapons; and artificial intelligence systems that seek power and are almost impossible to control.
Eh, Eh.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

As a college student interested in the future of AI and its impact on jobs and safety, understanding Hinton's story is crucial for following one of the most significant developments in modern technology.

Title:

Content: HI, {{username}}
Manage account
Change password
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
Here ’ s What Bill Gates Said After Calling on Tech Leaders to Stop Developing AI Systems
6.
APRIL
2023.
A
+
A
- Ah!
Print
Email
Email
A
+
A
- Ah!
Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, says he believes a pause in AI development won ’ t do much to solve the challenges ahead.
This is Gates ’ first public comment since Tesla CEO Elon Musk and more than 1,000 tech leaders and innovators called for a six-month moratorium on AI development, saying in an interview with Reuters that he doesn ’ t understand how a pause can take place globally.
Tech leaders have called for an urgent halt in the development of Microsoft ’ s new chatbot systems, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, summarize long documents, and do a lot of work.
Gates added that the technology holds revolutionary potential similar to the Internet and mobile phones, and asked in his talk to Reuters about the practical application of stopping the development of artificial intelligence and how to impose it.
Gates doesn ’ t think asking a particular group to stop development will solve the challenges, but there are clearly significant benefits to these things.
What we need to do is identify the danger points, he said.
MORE ABOUT
ADVERTISE HERE
JUST IN
TRENDING
HEADLINES
{{headlineCount}} new {{headlineCount = = 1?
'update': 'updates'}}
+ MORE HEADLINES
TRENDING
• online ordering system for restaurants
• The best online ordering systems for restaurants
•

Title:

Content: Setup
• Day and night
with the system.
Light color
Dark color
• Theme Colors
Ilya left OpenAI insider exposure: Altman cut his team's computing power to prioritize products to make money, leaving Tucao will lose equity
Quantum Bit 2024 / 5 / 18 17: 57: 48
Jan Leike, head of OpenAI Super Alignment, who just followed Ilya out of the company, revealed the real reason for leaving, and more.
One is that the computing power is not enough, and the 20% promised to the super-aligned team is lacking in weight, causing the team to go against the current, but it is also becoming more and more difficult.
Second, security is not valued, and the priority of AGI's security governance is better than the launch of "shining products".
Then, more gossip was dug up by others.
For example, OpenAI departing members must sign an agreement to ensure that they do not say bad things about OpenAI after leaving the company, and if they do not sign, they will automatically give up the company's shares.
But there are still hard bones who refuse to sign up and say that the core leadership has been divided on security priorities for a long time.
So far last year, the conflict between the two factions has reached a critical point, and this seems to be quite dignified.
Therefore, although Altman has sent a co-founder to take over the Super Alignment team, it is still not favored by the outside world.
Twitter users who rushed to the forefront thanked Jan for having the courage to say this amazing melon, and lamented:
It seems that OpenAI really doesn ’ t pay much attention to this security!
However, in retrospect, Altman, now in charge of OpenAI, can still sit for the time being.
He came out to thank Jan for his contributions to OpenAI super alignment and security, saying that Jan was sad and reluctant to leave.
Of course, the point is actually this sentence:
Wait. In two days, I'll be tweeting something longer than this.
The promised 20% hashrate actually has the composition of drawing big cakes
From last year's OpenAI Gong Dou to now, the soul figure and former chief scientist Ilya has barely appeared in public and spoken out.
Before he publicly announced his departure, opinions had been divided.
A lot of people think Ilya saw something terrible, like an AI system that could destroy humanity.
The first thing I wake up every day is to think about what Ilya sees.
This time Jan is open, the core reason is that the technical school and the market party security priorities have different views.
The differences are very serious, and the consequences are now...
Everybody saw it too.
According to Vox, a source familiar with OpenAI said that more security-focused employees have lost confidence in Altman, and that “it ’ s been a process of trust breaking down bit by bit. ”
But as you can see, not many departing employees are willing to talk about it publicly on public platforms and occasions.
Part of the reason is that OpenAI has a long tradition of having employees sign exit agreements with non-disparaging agreements.
Refusing to sign is tantamount to giving up the OpenAI option, which means that employees who come out and talk can lose a huge amount of money.
However, the dominoes fell one by one —
Ilya ’ s resignation adds to the recent wave of departures from OpenAI.
Following the announcement of his departure, at least five security team members have left in addition to Jan, the head of the Super Alignment team.
There is also a hard bone, Daniel Kokotajlo (hereinafter referred to as DK Brother), who has not signed a non-derogatory agreement.
Last year, DK wrote that he thought there was a 70% chance of an existential disaster for AI.
DK joined OpenAI in 2022, working in the governance team, mainly on guiding OpenAI to safely deploy AI.
But he also recently resigned and gave an interview:
OpenAI is training more powerful AI systems with the goal of eventually surpassing human intelligence across the board.
It may be the best thing that has ever happened to humanity, but it could also be the worst thing if we're not careful.
DK Brother elaborated that in that year, he joined OpenAI, full of revenge and hope for security governance, hoping that the closer OpenAI is to AGI, the more responsible it can be.
But many on the team slowly realized that OpenAI wouldn ’ t be like this anymore.
"There has been a gradual loss of confidence in the OpenAO leadership and their ability to handle AGI responsibly", which is why DK has resigned.
Disappointment over future AGI security work is part of Ilya ’ s growing wave of departures.
Part of the reason is that the super-aligned team may not be as resourceful as the outside world thinks.
Even if the hyper-aligned team is working at full capacity, the team will only get 20% of the computing power promised by OpenAI.
And some of the team's requests are often denied.
Of course, this is because computing resources are so important to AI companies that each point needs to be properly allocated, and because the work of the super-aligned team is to “solve different types of security issues that actually arise if the company succeeds in building AGIs. ”
In other words, the Super Alignment team corresponds to the future security issues that OpenAI needs to face — the focus is on the future, whether it will occur or not.
As of press time, Altman has not sent out his "longer tweet (than Jan's)."
But he briefly mentioned that Jan was right about security concerns, saying, "We still have a lot to do; we're committed to doing that."
At this point, we can start a small bench and so on, and then we will eat melon together for the first time.
In summary, the Super Alignment team has gone a lot of people, especially the departure of Ilya and Jan, which makes the team in the storm face a situation of lack of leadership.
Co-founder John Schulma took over, but no longer had a dedicated team.
The new Super Alignment team will be more loosely linked groups with members spread across the company ’ s various departments, which an OpenAI spokesperson described as “more deeply integrated. ”
This is also questioned, as John ’ s original full-time job was to ensure the security of the current OpenAI product.
After suddenly taking on more responsibilities, can John get busy and lead the two teams that focus on the present and the future security issues?
The Ilya-Altman Controversy
If the time line is lengthened, in fact, today's collapse is the sequel to the OpenAI "palace fight" Ilya-Altman dispute.
Back in November, Ilya was still there, working with the OpenAI board to try to fire Altman.
The reason given at the time was that he was not sincere enough in his communication.
In other words, we don ’ t trust him.
But the end result was obvious, Altman with his "allies" threatened to join Microsoft, resulting in the board succumbing and the recall failed.
Ilya leaves the board.
Altman, on his side, chose members who were more favorable to him to join the board.
After this, Ilya disappeared from the social platform until the official announced his departure a few days ago.
And it is said that it has not been in the OpenAI office for about six months.
He also left an intriguing tweet at the time, but it was quickly deleted.
In the past month, I have learned many lessons.
One of the lessons is that the phrase “beatings will continue until morale improves ” applies more often than it should.
But according to insiders, Ilya has long co-led the Super Alignment team.
On Altman ’ s side, employees ’ biggest accusations against him are inconsistencies, such as his claim that he wants to prioritize safety, but his behavior is contradictory.
Other than the originally promised computing resources were not given.
There are also funds such as looking for Saudi Arabia to raise money to build the core.
Employees who are concerned about safety are confused.
If he really cares about building and deploying AI in the safest way possible, wouldn ’ t it be so crazy to accumulate chips to speed up the technology?
Earlier, OpenAI ordered chips from a startup that Altman had invested in.
The amount is as high as 51 million US dollars (about 360 million yuan).
At that time, in the report of the former employees of OpenAI in the days of Gong Dou, the description of Altman seems to have been confirmed once again.
Because of this "inconsistent" operation from beginning to end, employees gradually lost confidence in OpenAI and Altman.
Ilya is like that, Jan Laike is like that, and so is the Super Alignment team.
Intimate netizens have sorted out the important nodes of relevant things that have happened in the past few years - first, a thoughtful reminder, and the P (doom) mentioned below refers to the possibility of “AI triggering the doomsday scenario. ”
• In 2021, the GPT-3 team leader left OpenAI for “security ” issues and founded Anthropic; one of them thought P (doom) was 10-25%;
In 2021, the head of security research at RLHF left, with P (doom) at 50%.
In 2023, the OpenAI board fired Altman.
In 2024, OpenAI fired two security researchers.
In 2024, an OpenAI researcher with a special focus on security left, and he believes that P (doom) is already at 70%.
In 2024, Ilya and Jan Laike left.
Tech or Market?
Since the development of the big model to date, "how to achieve AGI?" can actually be reduced to two routes.
The technical school hopes that the technology is mature and controllable to be reapplied; the market school believes that the application of the "progressive" approach to the end while opening up.
This is also the fundamental difference in the Ilya-Altman dispute over OpenAI ’ s mission:
Is it focused on AGI and super alignment, or is it focused on extending ChatGPT services?
The larger the ChatGPT service, the greater the amount of computation required; this will take up AGI ’ s security research time.
If OpenAI is a non-profit organization dedicated to research, they should spend more time on super alignment.
From the perspective of some OpenAI initiatives, the result is obviously not, they just want to get the top of the competition in the big model, and provide more services for enterprises and consumers.
In Ilya ’ s view, this is a very dangerous thing.
Even if we don't know what will happen with the expansion, Ilya believes that the best way to do this is to put safety first.
Open and transparent so that we humans can ensure that AGI is safely constructed, not in some secretive way.
But under Altman ’ s leadership, OpenAI seems to be pursuing neither open source nor super alignment.
Instead, it just wants to rush in the direction of AGI while trying to build a moat.
So did AI scientist Ilya make the right choice, or did Silicon Valley businessman Altman come to the end?
It is not yet known.
But at least OpenAI now faces a critical choice.
Industry insiders summed up two key signals, one is that ChatGPT is OpenAI ’ s main revenue, and without better model support, GPT-4 will not be available to everyone for free;
The other is that if the departing team members (Jan, Ilya, etc.) don ’ t worry about more powerful features soon, they won ’ t care about alignment issues …
If the AI stays at this level, it basically doesn ’ t matter.
But the fundamental contradiction of OpenAI has not been resolved, on the one hand, the concerns of fire-stealing AI scientists about the responsible development of AGI, and on the other, the urgency of the Silicon Valley market to commercialize the technology to promote sustainability.
The two sides are irreconcilable, science is completely out of OpenAI, and the outside world still does not know, GPT exactly where?
People who desperately want to know the answer to this question are a little tired.
A sense of powerlessness came to mind, as Ilya ’ s teacher, Hinton, one of the Turing Three, said:
I'm old, I'm worried, but there's nothing I can do about it.
Reference links:
• [1] https: / / www.vox.com / future-perfect / 2024 / 5 / 17 / 24158403 / openai-resignations-ai-safety-ilya-sutskever-jan-leike-artificial-intelligence
• [2] https: / / x.com / janleike / status / 1791498174659715494
• [3] https: / / twitter.com / sama / status / 1791543264090472660
Advertisement Statement: The external redirect links contained in the text (including not limited to hyperlinks, QR codes, passwords, etc.) are used to convey more information and save selection time. The results are for reference only. All articles of IT House contain this statement.
Related articles
Keyword: OpenAI ChatGPT Altman
Soft media 's website: IT home hot products - Value shopping guide, coupons most buy - rebate coupons iPhone home Win7 home Win10 home Win11 home
Soft media software: Cube cool point desktop Win7 optimization master Win10 optimization master soft media mobile APP application

Title:

Content: Advertisement
Arabic-International
Is Artificial Intelligence More Dangerous to Humanity than Nuclear Warfare?
02-06-2023 | 11: 00
A-
A +
photos 0
A +
A-
Once again, the heads of two prominent AI companies have issued a warning of the existential risks posed by advanced AI.
DeepMind and OpenAI executives Demis Hasebes and Sam Altman have pledged their support for a brief statement published by the Centre for AI Safety, calling on regulators and lawmakers to take AI ’ s “serious risks ” more seriously.
Advertisement
“Mitigating AI mortality should be a global priority, along with other risks that affect society as a whole, such as pandemics and nuclear war, ” the statement said.
The Center for Artificial Intelligence Safety, a San Francisco-based nonprofit that aims to "reduce the socially significant risks posed by artificial intelligence," said the use of AI in warfare may be "excessively harmful" because it could be used to develop new chemical weapons and boost air warfare.
The brief statement was signed by senior executives and academics in space science, although it does not explain what the signatories see as being threatened with annihilation by the dangers of artificial intelligence.
Signatories include Geoffrey Hinton, sometimes nicknamed the “godfather of artificial intelligence ”, and Elia Sotskifer, CEO of ChatGPT and one of the developers of OpenAI.
The list of signatories also includes dozens of managers of well-known companies, such as the director of Google, one of the founders of Skype, and the founders of the artificial intelligence company Anthropic.
Today, global discussions are focused on artificial intelligence after a number of companies launched new tools that enable users to produce text, images and even computer codes, without costing them anything but asking for what they want.
Experts say the technology could strip humans of many jobs – but this new statement points to deeper and greater risks.
The rise of tools such as ChatGBT and Dall-E has led to fears that artificial intelligence will one day annihilate humanity if it surpasses human intelligence.
Earlier this year, prominent tech bosses called on leading AI companies to halt their systems development for six months to work out ways to mitigate risks.
“Artificial intelligence systems that can compete with human intelligence can pose enormous risks to society and humanity as a whole, ” said an open letter published by the Future of Life Institute.
AI research and development activities should be focused on making today ’ s highly sophisticated and sophisticated systems more accurate, secure, clear, transparent, capable, adaptive, reliable, and loyal (to human life). ”
Go ahead.
Advertisement
Our news via your email
SIGN UP

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

## Who is Geoffrey Hinton?

Geoffrey Hinton is a pioneering computer scientist who has been instrumental in developing artificial intelligence as we know it today.

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

Often called the "Godfather" or "Father of AI," Hinton's contributions include:

- **Neural Networks**: He helped develop the foundational technology behind modern AI systems
- **Deep Learning**: In 2012, Hinton and his students created a breakthrough neural network system that could recognize images by analyzing thousands of photos
- **Turing

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

Which prestigious award did Hinton receive in 2018 for his work on neural networks?

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

Which prestigious award did Hinton receive in 2018 for his work on neural networks?