Greenland is believed to have significant rare earth deposits, including a mine with over half of the world's resources and 19 million tons of rare earth oxides.

The west coast of Greenland is a potential site for rare earth mineral deposits, prompting privately funded treasure hunts.

The Surftog Carbonatite complex in Greenland contains neodymium and praseodymium deposits, essential for rare earth magnets used in electric vehicles and wind turbines.

Extracting rare earth minerals in Greenland is expected to be difficult and environmentally harmful.

Toronto's New Performance Materials has been licensed to mine rare metals in Greenland's Surfertog project.

Kobold Metals and other companies are exploring Greenland for minerals with support from billionaires like Bezos, Bloomberg, and Gates.

The Greenland government has issued a mining license to Tanbreez Mining to extract rare earths, with production set to start next year.

China is interested in Greenland's rare earth minerals, with companies like Shenghe Resources and Sungho Resources investing there.

The Guanast area in southern Greenland has the world's second-largest reserves of rare earths and uranium, accounting for 10% of global production.

Greenland's parliament has banned uranium mining, halting rare earth development at Kuannersuit, and the new prime minister, Mute Egede, vows to stop the Guanast Rare Earth Mine project.

Environmental concerns in Greenland's rare earth mineral extraction include pollution, requiring controlled technology and qualified labor.

Valuing rare earth minerals requires control of extraction and refining technology, and accurate field surveys.

The European Commission has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Greenland to develop sustainable raw materials projects and related infrastructure.

Developing Greenland's infrastructure and extracting rare earth minerals will require international cooperation and investment.

Greenland is believed to have significant rare earth deposits, including a mine with over half of the world's resources and 19 million tons of rare earth oxides.

Title:

Content: Greenland to mine rare earths in 2024 | Economic Horizontal | DW | 30.07.2023
1.
Inhalt
2.
Navigation
3.
Weitere Inhalte
4.
Metanavigation
5.
Suche
6.
Choose from 30 Languages
Advertisement
Economic stratification
Greenland to mine rare earths in 2024
According to the German "Economic Weekly" reported that a mining company has obtained permission from the Greenland government to mine rare earths on the island.
The company said production could begin next year.
Tanbreez Mining, a mining company, plans to mine rare earths in Greenland next year, according to the Economic Weekly.
“We can start production next year, ” said Greg Barnes, a geologist and owner of the company. Greenland ’ s deputy minister for minerals confirmed to the journal that a mining licence had been issued.
Barnes said the Tanbreez mine "contains more than half of the world's rare earth resources" and has 19 million tons of rare earth oxides.
Of these, 30% are highly favored heavy rare earth elements.
Rare earth contains a total of 17 kinds of metal elements, the properties of each metal are different.
Each metal has a unique industrial value.
Some of them are irreplaceable.
They are used, for example, in the manufacture of electric vehicles or wind turbines.
Last year, about two-thirds of Germany ’ s rare earths came from China. Mining such as rare earths is difficult and often harmful to the environment, as rare earths are often associated with iron ore, and the chemical process of refining often requires the use of acidic substances.
What is Rare Earth?
Barnes, owner of Tanbreez Mining, told Economic Weekly that to start mining for rare earths in Greenland, a factory would be needed to separate rare earths from heterosexual rocks.
Currently there are only such factories in Russia and China.
But one such plant will be built in the United States in the coming months.
There are also plans to build a factory in Europe.
Thanks to technological advances, the equipment that separates rare earths currently costs only $40 million.
According to Barnes, China paid 1.7 billion U.S. dollars for the equipment 13 years ago.
In January, Swedish state-owned mining company LKAB announced the discovery of Europe ’ s largest rare earth deposit to date.
But the company said it would take 10-15 years for the rare earth mine, located in Kiruna in northern Sweden, to be available to the market.
EU Plans to Diversify Rare Earth Supply Chain
(Agence France-Presse, Economic Weekly)
© 2023 Deutsche Welle Copyright Notice: All content in this article is protected by copyright law and may not be used without special permission from Deutsche Welle.
Any misconduct will lead to recovery and criminal prosecution.
DW.COM

What does Greenland's Tanbreez mine contain?

19 million tons of rare earth oxides
over half of rare earth resources

The west coast of Greenland is a potential site for rare earth mineral deposits, prompting privately funded treasure hunts.

Title:

Content: Advertisement
Economics.
A race between financiers around the world to search for this substance in Greenland.
Interesting details!
10-08-2022 | 00: 49
A-
A +
photos 0
A +
A-
CNN reports that some of the world ’ s wealthiest people are funding large treasure hunts using helicopters and signal transmitters on Greenland ’ s west coast.
The climate crisis is causing Greenland ’ s ice to melt at unprecedented rates, ironically creating an opportunity for investors and mining companies looking for a treasure trove of important minerals capable of powering clean energy transitions.
Advertisement
Search for minerals in Greenland
Many billionaires, including Jeff Bezos, Michael Bloomberg and Bill Gates, are betting that what lies beneath the surface of the hills and valleys of Disco Island and Greenland ’ s Noswak Peninsula are important enough minerals to power millions of electric vehicles.
Speaking to CNN, Kobold Metals CEO Kurt House said: “We are looking for a deposition that will be the largest or second largest nickel and cobalt deposition in the world. ”
The disappearance of Arctic ice – both on land and in the ocean – highlights a unique dichotomy: Greenland is the zero point for the effects of climate change, but it could also be the zero point for the search for the minerals needed to provide solutions to this crisis.
For their part, representatives of Kobold Metals, a California-based mineral exploration company, said the billionaires ’ club is supporting the company financially.
Bezos, Gates and Bloomberg did not respond to requests from CNN for comment on the news, and Kobold Metals is partnering with Bluejay Mining to find precious and rare metals in Greenland, which are essential for building the electric vehicles and huge batteries needed to store renewable energy.
The Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland said Greenland could be a hot spot for coal, copper, gold, rare earth elements and zinc.
The Greenland government has conducted several assessments on ice-free land and is aware of the country ’ s “ability to diversify the national economy through mineral extraction, ” the agency said.
(Arabic Post)
Go ahead.
Advertisement
Our news via your email
SIGN UP
Softimpact
All rights reserved © Lebanon24
All rights reserved © Lebanon24
Softimpact

The Surftog Carbonatite complex in Greenland contains neodymium and praseodymium deposits, essential for rare earth magnets used in electric vehicles and wind turbines.

Title:

Content: A Canadian company has been granted a license to mine rare metals in Greenland.
© AP Photo / David Goldman Greenland ice melt August 3, 2017
Follow us via
Toronto ’ s New Performance Materials, one of the few rare earth metal processors outside China, has obtained an exploration license in Greenland from Hudson Resources in Vancouver (Canada).
Washington - Sputnik.
“Through a special-purpose entity, NEO plans to explore and develop the Surfertog project to further diversify its global sources of rare earth ore and expand the supply chains that feed the company ’ s rare earth ore separation facility in Estonia, ” it said in a statement.
NEO CEO Constantine Karianopoulos told the New York Times that his goal was to reduce the company ’ s exposure to volatile global crude prices.
NEO buys semi-processed raw materials from Russia, the United States and Australia.
"Collects Rare Minerals"...
China enters the world of "space mining" with the launch of the first robot...
A picture.
The Surftog Carbonatite complex contains mineral deposits rich in neodymium and praseodymium, which are essential components of the rare earth permanent magnet used in electric vehicles, wind turbines, high-efficiency electric motors and pumps that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
NEO also plans to build a new permanent magnet manufacturing plant in Estonia to supply European manufacturers of electric and hybrid vehicles, wind turbines, and energy-efficient electric motors and pumps, the statement said.
News Ticker
0.
To participate in the discussion
Sign in or Register
loader
Conversations
Заголовок открываемого материала

Extracting rare earth minerals in Greenland is expected to be difficult and environmentally harmful.

What has Greenland's new prime minister Mute Egede pledged to do regarding Kuannersuit rare earth mining?

Toronto's New Performance Materials has been licensed to mine rare metals in Greenland's Surfertog project.

What Canadian rare earths processing company obtained an exploration permit in Greenland?

Kobold Metals and other companies are exploring Greenland for minerals with support from billionaires like Bezos, Bloomberg, and Gates.

The Greenland government has issued a mining license to Tanbreez Mining to extract rare earths, with production set to start next year.

What company has obtained permission to extract Greenland's rare earths?

China is interested in Greenland's rare earth minerals, with companies like Shenghe Resources and Sungho Resources investing there.

Title:

Content: Greenland ban on uranium mining prevents Chinese companies from expanding rare earths
November 13, 2021 17: 33
Eastern Network Television
More News Clips
As part of its Arctic strategy, China has supported the mining of rare earths in Greenland by Australia ’ s Greenland Minerals, a Chinese-owned subsidiary of Shenghe Resources, through the Belt and Road Initiative.
However, Greenland ’ s parliament passed a new law banning uranium mining and halting the development of rare earth deposits at Kuannersuit, the southern tip of Greenland.
China's rare earth mining accounts for more than 70% of the global mining volume, and China's rare earth magnetic processing volume accounts for 90% of the global processing volume.
Sungho Resources, one of the world ’ s largest producers of rare earth materials, acquired a 12.5% stake in Greenland Minerals in 2016, making it the largest shareholder in the latter.
Guanast in southern Greenland is home to the world ’ s second-largest reserves of rare earths and uranium after China, accounting for 10% of the world ’ s rare earth production.
Since former US President Donald Trump proposed the idea of buying Greenland in 2019, the rich rare earth resources of Guanaster in southern Greenland have attracted attention.
Greenland ’ s local parliament was elected early on April 6. In the end, the pro-environmental left-wing Inuit Ataqatigiit party won the election, and its leader, Mute Egede, became the new prime minister.
He declared that he would do everything in his power to stop the Guanast Rare Earth Mine project.
In response, Greenland ’ s parliament has passed a new bill aimed at banning exploration of uranium deposits, as well as other radioactive deposits such as thorium, and halting the development of rare earth deposits at the southern tip of Greenland.

What countries are invested in Greenland Minerals corp?

Which company has become the largest sharesholder in Greenland Minerals?

The Guanast area in southern Greenland has the world's second-largest reserves of rare earths and uranium, accounting for 10% of global production.

Greenland's parliament has banned uranium mining, halting rare earth development at Kuannersuit, and the new prime minister, Mute Egede, vows to stop the Guanast Rare Earth Mine project.

What has Greenland done to undermine Chinese efforts to establish a foothold in the Arctic region?

What has Greenland's new prime minister Mute Egede pledged to do regarding Kuannersuit rare earth mining?

Which Greenland rare earth deposits has its Parliament prohibited from developing?

Environmental concerns in Greenland's rare earth mineral extraction include pollution, requiring controlled technology and qualified labor.

Title:

Content: Friday 01 December 2023
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Editors
Abdurrahim Ali
Editor-in-Chief
Dalia Abdul Rahim
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Editorial Board
Abdurrahim Ali
Editor-in-Chief
Dalia Abdul Rahim
The world.
EU and Greenland sign strategic partnership on raw material value chains
Follow the latest news through the app
The European Union has signed a memorandum of understanding with the Government of Greenland in Brussels to establish a strategic partnership to develop sustainable raw material value chains.
Greenland ’ s vast natural wealth is a key asset for reaping the benefits of global value chains, as it seeks to diversify its economy in a sustainable way, while 25 of the 34 critical raw materials identified by the Commission as strategically important for European industry and green transformation can be found in Greenland.
The Executive Vice President of the European Green Deal, Enterprise Relations and Foresight of the European Commission, Maros Sivčović, signed the Memorandum of Understanding with the Government of Greenland represented by the Minister of Business, Trade, Mineral Resources, Justice and Gender Equality, Naga Nathanelsen.
The signing of the MoU will contribute to the development of sustainable projects along the raw materials value chains and the deployment of the necessary infrastructure for their development.
The MoU provides for close cooperation between Greenland and the EU in five important areas; among which is the development of economic and industrial integration of the value chains of vital raw materials and other raw materials.
This includes networking, joint project development, creating and promoting new business models, attracting investments, supporting access to finance, facilitating business linkages, developing and integrating support for economic diversification and ensuring the smooth functioning and resilience of value chains.
Foster collaboration to leverage high environmental, social and international governance (ESG) standards, to ensure that Greenland ’ s mineral sector serves as a lever for sustainable and inclusive economic growth while creating local and local value.
This includes the sustainable exploitation of mineral resources in close dialogue with the Greenland community of individuals, organisations, institutions and other stakeholders, taking fully into account the unique nature of Greenland ’ s pristine lands and applying high environmental, social and governance standards set out in legislation, conventions, guidelines and best practices.
Deploy the infrastructure needed to develop raw material value chains.
This includes taking into account the specificities of Greenland's transport and energy infrastructure needs, taking into account Arctic or sub-Arctic conditions, and supporting the mobilization of funding for such infrastructure.
Capacity building and skills development along raw material value chains.
This includes developing skills at all levels in the raw materials industry and wider society.
Greenland is eligible to participate in the EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation and provides Earth observation data thanks to the European Copernicus Satellite Programme which offers promising opportunities related to mineral exploration, sediment mapping and mining monitoring including waste management and environmental impact monitoring.
according to the statement.

Valuing rare earth minerals requires control of extraction and refining technology, and accurate field surveys.

Title:

Content: Expert: Algeria is sleeping on a precious treasure
Money and Business
Copy Link https: / / en.rt.com / trfy
Economist Abdelkader Soleimani considered that Algeria sleeps on an "inexhaustible treasure" and a considerable wealth, where there are 38 classical minerals on its soil, along with a significant stockpile of rare metals.
He pointed out that these minerals or dust, although important, require exploitation.
He stressed the need to control the technology of extraction and refining because they are toxic materials and control the tracks of mining, any conversion from dust to alloys, with the need for a formative system, a general orientation and a clear economic vision.
Economist Abdelkader Soleimani said in a statement to Al-Khobar: "It is beautiful that Algeria has an important stock of rare earth or minerals, whether the reserve is in the range of 10 or 20 percent, because there are no studies and accurate surveys in the field, but the valuation of such minerals will require control of extraction and refining technology, as they are toxic materials as well as mining."
The expert pointed out that rare earth metals or rare earth elements as defined by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, are a group of 17 chemical elements in the periodic table, specifically scandium, etrium, and lanthanides, and rare earths have become an important material in green manufacturing, but the problem lies in the difficulty of extraction and processing, especially as they are very polluted to nature, which requires control of technology and qualified labor. and refining. ”
The expert pointed out that rare earth or rare earth has returned to the forefront, especially with the statement of French President Emmanuel Macron on the possibility of cooperation between Algeria and France in the development of these minerals or rare earth, adding that "the world is witnessing a huge technological revolution and means of communication such as phones, for example, when we take the iPhone, we find that it contains eight rare metals. The exploitation and development of the exploitation of these minerals, and the intensification of competition between China, America and Britain in particular, makes them important. ”
Soleimani noted in the same context, "The trade of rare earth represents about $1.5 billion, but its importance lies in its multiple and diverse uses, including military, technological and electric vehicles.
It is noted that minerals are present in most countries, but the refining and conversion process is especially present in China, because exploiting them requires heavy and modern equipment and very sophisticated technological means, the huge capacity of mining in China makes it control 85% of the production and trade of rare soil oxide and 90% of magnetic materials.
On the other hand, the economist stressed that President Abdelmadjid Tebboune has already stressed the value of natural resources, pointing out the importance of adopting accurate studies and surveys to determine the actual capacities, whether in terms of stocks or reserves, to ensure attracting investments in the field, with the adoption of a vision to ensure a surplus of value, with the establishment of factories for refining, conversion and mining. For example, the amount of iron converted is sold at about $500 per ton, for example, that is, ensure the production of wealth, employ labor, activate a handling network and achieve comprehensive and sustainable development, with the achievement of metal poles in mining production and conversion.
The expert stressed the need for training and qualification in the field of mining, while establishing partnerships with countries experienced in the field, whether for China, South Africa or others, and avoiding the export or sale of raw materials.
Source: News
Agree.
This website uses cookies. You can read the terms of use to activate this feature by clicking here

The European Commission has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Greenland to develop sustainable raw materials projects and related infrastructure.

Developing Greenland's infrastructure and extracting rare earth minerals will require international cooperation and investment.

Title:

Content: The government of Greenland, which is located in the Arctic, said on Monday it had revoked the license of a Chinese mining company to mine an iron ore deposit near the capital, Nuuk.
The move has dealt a blow to efforts by Chinese companies to gain a foothold in the resource-rich Arctic region.
China ’ s General Nice took control of the Isua mine in 2015, replacing bankrupt London Mining.
Junan became the first Chinese company to acquire mining rights in Greenland.
Greenland is an autonomous region of Denmark and is rich in minerals.
As a result of the warming climate, waterways have been opened, allowing the resources of the Arctic Island to be developed and utilized.
The Greenland government pointed out that the mine was idle and Junan did not pay the agreed guarantee and therefore withdrew its license.
Once Junan returns the license, Greenland will re-offer it to interested companies.
At present, the government of Greenland has asked Junan to return all the geological data, pay the remaining 1.5 million Danish kroner (about $226,000) of the deposit, and clean up the mine.
The London mine, which was granted mining rights in 2013, initially planned to employ 2,000 Chinese workers to mine, with a goal of supplying about 15 million tonnes of iron ore to China each year.
Greenland banned uranium mining this year, blocking mining in the Kuannersuit region, one of the world ’ s largest rare earth mines and partly owned by a Chinese company.
Junan tried to buy an abandoned naval base in Greenland from Denmark in 2016, but sources told Reuters at the time that the Danish authorities had rejected the proposal for security reasons.
# Greenland # Junan # Mining # China # Mining


The countries of the European Union have the best waste sorting and recycling systems, with Belgium being the leader, where 91% of the population sorts garbage.

Belgium's success in waste sorting and recycling is followed by the countries of the Middle East, then the countries of Africa, then Latin America, and then Canada.

South Korea has a well-organized and highly efficient waste management system, with Seoul being the most effective, and the local municipal authorities have the responsibility to collect, recycle and dispose of domestic and commercial solid waste.

Taiwan has also introduced a waste levy policy and formulated a complex and effective waste management system, which has led to significant improvements in waste recycling.

Singapore has a small population, but its waste recycling work is more professional and centralized, with three waste management enterprises licensed by the National Environment Agency (NEA) to provide waste collection and recycling services.

In Singapore, waste is meticulously classified into paper, plastic, glass, and metal, and garden waste is collected separately, with incineration plants reducing the volume of waste by 90%.

The Taiwan government has implemented a "Resource Recovery 4-in-1 Program" which fully mobilized the role of the government, manufacturers, consumers, and licensed recycling enterprises in waste management.

The program has not only distributed the financial costs but also reflected the principle of impartiality, and has been successful in promoting waste recycling in Taiwan.

The city of Seoul has introduced a series of supporting measures to change the entire waste treatment model, public perception of waste, and living habits after the implementation of the garbage levy system in 1995.

The Shanghai Municipal Domestic Waste Management Ordinance was officially implemented in 2019, which has led to significant improvements in waste management in Shanghai.

New Zealand is a nation of committed recyclers, with a strong focus on reducing waste and keeping products and materials in use, supporting the country's sustainability shift.

The city of Timaru in New Zealand has a new materials recovery facility, which is the region's biggest resource recovery hub, and is operated by EnviroWaste, part of the EnviroNZ group.

The facility takes kerbside mixed recycling from Timaru, Waimate, Mackenzie, Ashburton, and Central Otago district councils, as well as commercial businesses' recycling, and has the capacity to process five tonnes of material per hour.

The "Clean, Green, and Safe Approach" is a unique approach that is applicable for both rural and urban settings, as well as in both community and schools, to ensure that children and the community are sensitized to keep the environment clean, green, and safe for all.

The Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle (3R) approach is an important component of modern waste reduction, and involves collecting recyclable materials, sorting and processing recyclables into raw materials, and purchasing recycled products.

The role of the government is crucial in promoting and implementing effective waste management practices, as seen in the examples of Singapore, South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan, where governments have introduced policies and regulations to support waste sorting and recycling.

In countries with successful waste recycling systems, local communities and private sectors play a crucial role in waste management by adopting the circular economy principle and minimizing waste production.

The concept of recycling is seen as a value-added activity that helps create green jobs and strengthen the local economy, making it a shared responsibility among citizens, producers, importers, consumers, and local and central administrations.

The effectiveness of waste sorting and recycling systems in countries like Belgium and South Korea is typically evaluated using performance metrics such as recycling rate, waste diversion rate, and greenhouse gas reduction.

The government plays a crucial role in promoting and implementing effective waste sorting and recycling practices, through policies such as extended producer responsibility, pay-as-you-throw systems, and public education campaigns.

The use of advanced technologies, such as smart recycling bins and waste-to-energy facilities, is also an important factor in the effectiveness of waste sorting and recycling systems in these countries.

Overall, the successful implementation of waste recycling systems in countries requires a collaborative effort between local communities, private sectors, and government agencies, with a focus on promoting sustainable practices and providing incentives for participation.

The countries of the European Union have the best waste sorting and recycling systems, with Belgium being the leader, where 91% of the population sorts garbage.

Title:

Content: ROP, or How will Kyrgyzstan recycle its waste?
In Bishkek, a seminar was held on the topic of extended producer responsibility (EPR) for the disposal of goods and packaging, organized by the WasteNet.KG. project.
The seminar was attended by producers of products, government authorities, waste processing enterprises, non-governmental and international organizations and experts.
Director of CSR Central Asia Agency Asel Arstanbekova noted that the issues of environmental safety, social responsibility of producers are very acute.
“In many countries, the topic of social expanded responsibility is already active and, having studied their experience, we would like to determine what is applicable for Kyrgyzstan, ” she said.
WasteNet.KG expert Natalia Baidakova presented the concept of the concept of extended producer responsibility (EPR), its implementation mechanisms, and the ultimate goal of which is to reduce and gradually reduce to zero the disposal of waste that can be used in recycling and recycling.
How is the situation with the ROP in Kyrgyzstan?
The issue of waste accumulation in Kyrgyzstan is reflected in many strategic documents, such as the National Development Strategy of Kyrgyzstan until 2040, the Green Economy Concept, and the Green Economy Development Program.
More than 40 laws include waste issues.
The main ones are the law on environmental protection, on industrial waste, which was adopted back in 2001.
Naturally, this document needs to be amended and supplemented.
In addition, a classification of hazardous waste based on international standards has been developed and adopted.
The legislation specifies that separate collection of waste should be carried out, for use as secondary resources it is prohibited to use hazardous waste as secondary raw materials.
But at the same time, many norms are absent, for example, there is no definition of what secondary waste is, there are no norms regulating the collection and processing of secondary raw materials, there are no norms for stimulating the processing of secondary materials, and so on.
The legislation undoubtedly requires changes, another thing is what these changes will be.
On March 19, 2021, a decree of the President of Kyrgyzstan on measures to ensure environmental and climate security was adopted.
A number of points were aimed at improving the efficiency of waste management, implementing separate collection of garbage, including stimulating the creation of recycling enterprises.
In 2019, a number of laws were also amended, for example, the law of consumption production, the procedure for handling hazardous mercury-containing waste.
What now?
In Kyrgyzstan, favorable conditions have been created for the organization of an effective management system and the introduction of expanded producer responsibility.
Thus, in December 2021, the Action Plan of the Cabinet of Ministers on the implementation of the National Development Program of the Kyrgyz Republic until 2026 was approved, which provides for the implementation of a number of measures to improve the waste management system.
The measures are aimed at introducing amendments and additions to laws, regulatory legal acts, including in terms of introducing the principles of the concept of extended responsibility of manufacturers of ROP for the disposal of goods and packaging.
Experience of other countries and international companies
Aleksandara Akirman, Caucasus and Central Asia Public Relations Manager at The Coca-Cola Foundation, noted that almost all global manufacturers of goods and packaging have committed to transfer from 8 to 10% of secondary raw materials to new packaging.
“In the next five to ten years, the companies intend to use more environmentally friendly materials, develop new types of packaging, provide for collection and processing.
At the same time, companies are trying to work with government authorities in their respective countries to ensure that such systems develop.
Now in Kyrgyzstan there is a linear economy of packaging, in which most packages go to landfill, are dumped in the form of garbage.
Almost 100% of the primary material is used.
While in a circular economy, plastic packaging is used endlessly.
The new packaging needs to be recycled.
Such a circular economy is possible.
In more than 30 countries around the world, we produce packaging from recycled materials, ” she said.
The OECD Environment Directorate, economist and environmentalist Frisief Lubinger in his speech noted that at present the ROP system is actively developing and is beginning to be used more intensively around the world.
"The transition to PPE is particularly active in North America, Europe and a number of transition economies, but it should be noted that in transition economies, additional resources are needed to make the system fully operational," he added.
Next, Givi Kalandadze, an expert from Georgia, the chairman of the operator of the ROP, said that the country has a special law on waste management, which has a special section under number 9 dedicated to the ROP.
“Also, the law has an important section dedicated to responsible persons who monitor the ROP.
Such a manager should be in each organization and be responsible for coordination, for cooperation with stakeholders in waste management. "
Experts from Kazakhstan and Russia also spoke about the system of implementation of the ROP in their countries, about successes and failures.
In addition, during the event, it was noted that the first place in the ROP system for packaging is occupied by the countries of the European Union, in which Belgium is the leader, where 91% of the population sorts garbage.
Next are the countries of the Middle East, followed by the countries of Africa, then Latin America, followed by Canada, then the countries of Southeast Asia and close the list of the countries of the former USSR.
Author: Munara Borombaeva.
Photo: Vlad Ushakov
Source: Kuramastory
Tell us your news:
BACK TO TOP
BACK TO

Belgium's success in waste sorting and recycling is followed by the countries of the Middle East, then the countries of Africa, then Latin America, and then Canada.

South Korea has a well-organized and highly efficient waste management system, with Seoul being the most effective, and the local municipal authorities have the responsibility to collect, recycle and dispose of domestic and commercial solid waste.

Title:

Content: Waste management in Hong Kong starts early and matures late. How can we catch up with Taiwan, Shanghai, Korea and the tail lights of the starry cars?
Author: 01 Weekly Report
Published: Updated:
Hong Kong's environmental protection policy has not made great progress. For many years, it seems that it has remained at the stage of "blue waste paper, yellow aluminum cans, coffee plastic bottles", and there is no plastic reduction policy.
Last year, the mainland stopped the import of waste paper, and Hong Kong recyclers also stopped collecting waste paper.
When the Government is faced with Members' questions on plastic reduction and countless initiatives by environmental groups, it is always in a state of "discussion" with the retail and restaurant industries, "under consideration", lest it harm the economic interests of the industry, and would rather harm the environmental benefits than see any actual action taken.
On July 1, 2019, the Shanghai Municipal Domestic Waste Management Ordinance was officially implemented.
At Haihong Bridge Station on the railway line, volunteers are promoting a little knowledge of garbage classification. (Visual China)
On the other hand, after years of vigorous promotion, waste management is well organized and highly efficient: South Korea ’ s waste management system is at the forefront of Asia, with Seoul being the most effective.
The local municipal authorities have the responsibility to collect, recycle and dispose of domestic and commercial solid waste. Waste management in Taiwan once lagged behind Hong Kong, but due to the early introduction of the waste levy policy by the Taiwan government, and then formulated a complex and effective waste management system, the situation in Singapore is gradually reversed. Shanghai launched the “Shanghai Municipal Domestic Waste Management Ordinance ” in 2019. The complicated measures have caused complaints from the public. Over time, the results can be said to be immediate after the people have familiarized themselves with the regulations.
Looking at the situation in these four Asian regions, it is not difficult to imagine why there is no systematic waste management in Hong Kong today, when we look back at Hong Kong's garbage collection practices, which rely entirely on the people's consciousness to separate and unsupervised waste.
For more details, please read the 285th issue of Hong Kong 01 (4 October 2021), “What should Hong Kong look for in Taiwan, Shanghai, Korea and Star? ”.
Click here to try our weekly newsletter for more in-depth coverage.
285 issues of Hong Kong 01 e-newsletter Other exclusive highlights:
Pull gate limit or energy consumption double control? China North and South electricity shortage is the same and different
The Expectations of Lam Cheng's Final Policy Address: Regaining the Dominant Power of Development and Restructuring the Land Economy
"Left glue" opens up the land, imagines that the government is lagging behind the people.
Has the central bank 'pacified' the property market twice in a week?
Sixteen Years of Progress: The Delayed Garbage Levy Ordinance
After Meng Wanzhou's return to the motherland, the public opinion has been heated to examine Sino-US relations.
Lau Kwok-hoon: Regaining the "True Hong Kong Speed" and developing a new centre in New Territories North
Is the time for UK to relax regulation of gene editing agriculture coming?
An Interview with Chu Hsing-hsiang and Hu Kuo-hsien
Leave a comment...

Taiwan has also introduced a waste levy policy and formulated a complex and effective waste management system, which has led to significant improvements in waste recycling.

Singapore has a small population, but its waste recycling work is more professional and centralized, with three waste management enterprises licensed by the National Environment Agency (NEA) to provide waste collection and recycling services.

Title:

Content: Hong Kong ’ s slow progress in environmental governance – why not look at the Greater Bay Area and the world?
Author: Liu Mengting
Published: Updated:
In 2005, the SAR Government proposed to develop a recycling economy, that is, to reduce the environmental burden by repairing, recycling and extending the service life of materials, to find a way out for recycling recyclable materials, and to promote the development of related industries and promote economic diversification.
However, more than a decade later, Hong Kong ’ s circular economy has not made much progress.
In this regard, some scholars suggest leveraging the advantages of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.
At the same time, Hong Kong ’ s waste management policy is not yet climate, and we must match the experience of “top students ” such as Korea, Taiwan and Singapore.
Circular Economy Enemies the Greater Bay Area
Professor Patrick Poon, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, has been developing a patented technology for converting waste glass into environmentally friendly bricks since the 1990s, with a view to improving the recycling efficiency of waste glass.
Green brick is a kind of concrete brick, can effectively use construction waste and waste glass, the third generation of green brick has been put into the market as paving brick.
For more than 20 years, the technology has been optimized by scholars to the fifth generation, but it is still “technology without market ”.
In an interview with "Hong Kong 01" recently, Poon mentioned the two main reasons why the development of the local green brick industry is hindered, which is also the dilemma faced by Hong Kong's circular economy.
Pan Chih-sheng says that the research on green bricks has been successful, but the price is not competitive. (photo by O'Cara)
One of the main reasons is that local manufacturing has caused the high enterprise products to lose market advantage. Poon analysis, because the whole production process of environmentally friendly bricks produced in Hong Kong is completed in Hong Kong, and the land price and labor in Hong Kong are very high, and the price has also risen with the water. It is necessary to open up the market to achieve maximum trade liberalization, so the possibility of contractors choosing Hong Kong materials for profit considerations is very low.
On the other hand, the Hong Kong government has not introduced relevant policies to require the actual use of environmentally friendly materials, in the absence of just the premise, the market share of environmentally friendly bricks is unstable, and the current use of the third generation of environmentally friendly bricks is about 20% more expensive than natural sand bricks, so the project side may not consider the use of environmentally friendly bricks.
Another major obstacle is that the government did not help. Pan Zhisheng pointed out that environmental protection bricks are made of recycled materials, although the quality and performance of the bricks are not lost to natural sand and stone, but the quality difference is greater.
However, according to the existing government regulations, the two are regarded as the same, that is, the quality of environmentally friendly materials is too high, but it may still be regarded as unqualified due to the degree of quality difference. This single regulation is a constraint for the application of environmentally friendly bricks. If the outlook does not improve, it will be more difficult to attract investors.
Under such a vicious cycle, the government has no intention to invest or give support, and the environmental protection brick industry chain has become a dead end.
The recycling rate of local waste in Hong Kong is low, and exports are facing many restrictions.
In an interview with Hong Kong 01, Wong Woon-chung, director of the Johan Centre for Applied Forestry Research in the Pearl River Delta (PRD), Hong Kong Baptist University, pointed out that the land resources in Hong Kong are tight, such as the opening of a recycling plant for recycled materials will double the cost.
Mr Wong stressed that the circular economy requires complementary advantages from different regions. There is no way out if the development vision is limited to Hong Kong. (photo by Mr Cheng Tze-feng)
Waste management in Hong Kong is inefficient and should be seen around the world
South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan implemented waste levies in 1995, 1996 and 2000 respectively. Since then, they have gradually developed comprehensive and mature environmental policies with local characteristics.
Hong Kong's waste management system has been fragmented for many years, and it is time to look at the world and learn from advanced experience and thinking.
Hong Kong ’ s waste management policy has not been good for many years, and the climate should be on par with other regions. (Photo by Tsai Cheng-pong)
Korea has introduced waste utilization measures in a multi-pronged manner to achieve long-term management, so the Korean waste management system is at the forefront of Asia.
For example, the city of Seoul, which has achieved the most remarkable results, introduced a series of supporting measures in a few years to change the entire waste treatment model, public perception of waste and living habits after the implementation of the garbage levy system in 1995.
In contrast, the Hong Kong Government is always "discussing" with the industry and "considering" the initiatives of environmental protection groups.
Taiwan is also a leader in waste management in Asia.
The Taiwan government sent a special cleaning team to collect household waste from residents using two types of recycling trucks – yellow garbage trucks are used to collect general waste from residents using official garbage bags, and white garbage trucks are used to collect raw and cooked food waste, plastic and other recyclable resources.
As early as 1997, the Taiwan Environmental Protection Agency launched the "Resource Recovery 4-in-1 Program", which fully mobilized the role of the government, manufacturers, consumers and licensed recycling enterprises in waste management, not only to skillfully distribute the financial costs, but also to reflect the principle of impartiality.
Singapore has a small population, similar to Hong Kong, but the waste recycling work is more professional and centralized.
In Singapore, three waste management enterprises are licensed by the National Environment Agency (NEA) to provide waste collection and recycling services to residents in different parts of the country. The waste is meticulously classified into paper, plastic, glass and metal, and the garden waste is collected separately.
In the recycling process, incineration plants reduce the volume of waste by 90%, and then use 3% of non-incineration and non-recyclable waste to landfill to reduce the environmental burden.
According to statistics, Singapore ’ s solid waste recycling rate reached 51.7% in 2020, a model that Hong Kong can learn from.
As for the administrative efficiency of the Mainland, it is also worth reflecting on the Hong Kong government. In July 2019, Shanghai implemented what has been described as the “world ’ s most stringent ” waste separation measure.
First of all, its domestic waste is strictly divided into four categories, namely recyclables, hazardous waste, wet waste and dry waste; secondly, if individuals or units do not dispose of garbage in accordance with the classification, they will be punished with severe high fines.
Under the mandatory implementation of the government, Shanghai residents have achieved good environmental protection results after experiencing "pain".
The Garbage Levy Ordinance has already been introduced, but the Government must not be complacent about it, but must think about how to tie in with the Ordinance in the next step, and adopt a systematic and comprehensive thinking to achieve long-term waste management.
Leave a comment...

In Singapore, waste is meticulously classified into paper, plastic, glass, and metal, and garden waste is collected separately, with incineration plants reducing the volume of waste by 90%.

The Taiwan government has implemented a "Resource Recovery 4-in-1 Program" which fully mobilized the role of the government, manufacturers, consumers, and licensed recycling enterprises in waste management.

The program has not only distributed the financial costs but also reflected the principle of impartiality, and has been successful in promoting waste recycling in Taiwan.

The city of Seoul has introduced a series of supporting measures to change the entire waste treatment model, public perception of waste, and living habits after the implementation of the garbage levy system in 1995.

The Shanghai Municipal Domestic Waste Management Ordinance was officially implemented in 2019, which has led to significant improvements in waste management in Shanghai.

New Zealand is a nation of committed recyclers, with a strong focus on reducing waste and keeping products and materials in use, supporting the country's sustainability shift.

Title:

Content: Recommended NZ | Guide to Money | Gimme: Competitions - Giveaways

Timaru’s new materials recovery facility offers local sustainability solutions

Contributor:
Fuseworks Media

South Canterbury’s waste minimisation and recycling efforts have received a major boost with the commissioning of a new $3.8 million materials recovery facility (MRF) in Timaru.

The new MRF is operated by EnviroWaste, part of the EnviroNZ group, and is the region’s biggest resource recovery hub. It takes kerbside mixed recycling from Timaru, Waimate, Mackenzie, Ashburton and Central Otago district councils, as well as commercial businesses’ recycling. Sorting mixed plastics, aluminium and steel paper and cardboard, it has the capacity to process five tonnes of material per hour.

"We’re a nation of committed recyclers - just look up and down your street on collection day," says EnviroNZ CEO Chris Aughton. "With the increasing focus on how we can reduce the waste we create and keep products and materials in use, this act of everyday environmentalism is supporting New Zealand’s sustainability shift," he says.

Household and commercial recycling requires sorting on a large scale, explains Aughton. "Our new materials recovery facility is a piece of critical regional infrastructure that expands local recycling capabilities and supports community sustainability solutions. It keeps valuable resources in circulation and reduces the amount of waste that ends up in landfill.

"By working in close partnership with local councils, together we’re able to deliver improved outcomes for the community and the environment," he says.

The opening of the next generation MRF is an important milestone for Timaru and the wider region, says Mayor Nigel Bowen. "Timaru District was ahead of the curve when it adopted its three bin system more than 15 years ago. Like nearly every sector technology has evolved and improved, so it’s great that the new contract with EnviroWaste has enabled us to build a new state of the art MRF to ensure we can continue to be sector leaders in recycling."

"This time round it’s not just Timaru District that benefits from this new facility. Through our collaboration with Waimate and Mackenzie, and now with Ashburton and Central Otago also using it, we can be a regional centre of excellence in waste management," he says.

Once sorted and separated, recyclables are sent to local and international markets so they can have a second life.

"There’s a growing number of products being made with recycled content right here in New Zealand," says Aughton. "Plastics from your recycling bin are transformed into new products that are used by the likes of food producers, farmers and the building industry, while glass bottles and jars are melted down to make new glass containers. Households are a vital link in New Zealand’s shift towards a circular economy."

All articles and comments on Voxy.co.nz have been submitted by our community of users. Please notify us if you believe an item on this site breaches our community guidelines.

The city of Timaru in New Zealand has a new materials recovery facility, which is the region's biggest resource recovery hub, and is operated by EnviroWaste, part of the EnviroNZ group.

The facility takes kerbside mixed recycling from Timaru, Waimate, Mackenzie, Ashburton, and Central Otago district councils, as well as commercial businesses' recycling, and has the capacity to process five tonnes of material per hour.

The "Clean, Green, and Safe Approach" is a unique approach that is applicable for both rural and urban settings, as well as in both community and schools, to ensure that children and the community are sensitized to keep the environment clean, green, and safe for all.

Title:

Content: Wednesday, 15 June, 2022, 12:33 AM
Advance Search
Home Op-Ed

On solid waste management in urban areas

Published : Wednesday, 15 June, 2022 at 12:00 AM  Count : 57
Muzammel Haque

Industry is the major source of greenhouse gases that are harmful to the environment and human health because it contains toxic substances and hazardous materials. Mercury, lead, and even arsenic, which are found in e-waste and released into the environment, can cause serious illnesses and harm to those who are exposed to them.

80 percent of children working on waste sites in Bangladesh suffered from respiratory illnesses, lung diseases, and high levels of lead in their blood (ILO).

Scavenger Children working on waste sites will come into contact with these hazardous elements on a daily basis for extended periods of time. The longer and more consistent the exposure, the more likely they will become ill.

Bangladesh's urban areas generate approximately 25,000 tonnes of solid waste per day, which equates to 170 kg per capita per year.

Dhaka generates one-quarter of the country's urban waste. Due to high population growth and increased per capita waste generation, total urban solid waste is expected to reach 47,000 tonnes per day by 2025. Bangladesh's annual per capita plastic consumption in urban areas tripled to 9kg in 2020 from 3kg in 2005, according to World Bank.

Every day, millions of bags are dumped in four rivers around the Dhaka city, with a large portion of them ending up in drains, lakes, and rivers. Again, toxic chemicals and radioactive materials can be found in hospital and clinical waste.

In Bangladesh, the city corporation is primarily responsible for waste collection and management. Despite limited waste management services, door-to-door community waste collection from households to local trash cans is regarded as a success.

Informal waste recycling systems are also extremely beneficial in terms of waste recycling and job creation for the poor.

To achieve the 2030 agenda for Sustainable Development Goal, urban local governments must design proper waste disposal methods and invest adequately over the next decade.

According to the UN's Sustainable Development Goal 11, we must "make cities inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable."

One of the major areas that needs significant improvement to achieve this goal is safe waste disposal. Add to that the climate change impact of methane and CO2 from poorly managed waste: within ten years, dumpsites could be responsible for up to a tenth of manmade greenhouse gas emissions.

Bangladesh should implement a long-term strategy (consisting of five interconnected strategies research, advocacy, capacity building, communication and intervention strategies) of Climate Change and Solid Waste Management Programmes under the City Corporation.

This strategy would include a mission, vision, and theory of change, and it would be a living document that would evolve and improve over time.

Effective climate change education should be provided through a suitable and low-cost environment friendly waste management system that linked the local government and private sectors for the benefit of scavenging children and a sustainable environment.

The climate smart community's goal is to use climate adaptation and mitigation technologies with the goal of eventually converting a community to be climate-smart, which focuses on maximizing the use of natural resources without depleting the community's natural systems' capacity to be sustainable.

City Corporations have been working on another unique approach known as the 'Clean, Green, and Safe Approach,' which is applicable for both rural and urban settings, as well as in both community and schools, to ensure that children, community are sensitized to ensure that the environment is clean, green, and safe for all.

Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle (3R) approach is an important component of modern waste reduction.

Collecting recyclable materials that would otherwise be considered waste, sorting and processing recyclables into raw materials such as fibers, manufacturing raw materials into new products, and purchasing recycled products are all examples of recycling.

Integrated Sustainable Waste Management (ISWM) -City Corporations should take the issue of ISWM very seriously, strengthening operational procedures, adopting innovative technologies, and involving local communities, NGOs, and private sectors in proper solid waste management.

A scientific system for organic waste collection from home to home has been established. Composting organic waste is available in some facilities across the country.

Furthermore, some farmers have joined forces to improve and expand the use and production of compost across the country. Instead, if this organic waste is composted, it could be a great source of organic fertilizer.

Anaerobic digestion is used in biogas systems to recycle organic materials, converting them into biogas, which contains both energy (gas) and valuable soil products.

Anaerobic digestion occurs naturally, in landfills, and in some livestock manure management systems, but it can be optimized, controlled, and contained with the help of an anaerobic digester.

Once capital costs are addressed and climate change adaptation, mitigation, and sustainable waste management technologies are in place, the proposed effective intervention will be self-sustaining.
Muzammel Haque, Consultant and Development Practitioner

« PreviousNext »

Latest News
Most Read News
Editor : Iqbal Sobhan Chowdhury
Published by the Editor on behalf of the Observer Ltd. from Globe Printers, 24/A, New Eskaton Road, Ramna, Dhaka.
Editorial, News and Commercial Offices : Aziz Bhaban (2nd floor), 93, Motijheel C/A, Dhaka-1000. Phone: PABX 223353467, 223353481-2; Online: 9513959; Advertisement: 9513663.
E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],   [ABOUT US]     [CONTACT US]   [AD RATE]   Developed & Maintenance by i2soft

The Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle (3R) approach is an important component of modern waste reduction, and involves collecting recyclable materials, sorting and processing recyclables into raw materials, and purchasing recycled products.

The role of the government is crucial in promoting and implementing effective waste management practices, as seen in the examples of Singapore, South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan, where governments have introduced policies and regulations to support waste sorting and recycling.

In countries with successful waste recycling systems, local communities and private sectors play a crucial role in waste management by adopting the circular economy principle and minimizing waste production.

Title:

Content: Bauhinia Party ｜ The Dilemma and Countermeasures of Hong Kong ’ s Waste Management System
Author: 01 Forum
Published: Updated:
Author ： Shi Lei
The author believes that many of the current garbage collection disputes have been implemented to the feasibility level, in fact, are related to the inadequacy of the behavior system of residential areas to place garbage, and some of the shortcomings have not been collected garbage bags to make up for.
Its shortcomings mainly include: almost all residents of the garbage can be carried out 24 hours (such as a fixed garbage room and a long "business hours"), each residents of the garbage room often let the residents put garbage into (super) large garbage bins, and each garbage room corresponding to the number of residents, resulting in if there is a "black sheep" do not buy a levy garbage bag to throw garbage, they can walk without obstruction.
Property companies or FEHD contractors may have to wait for a long time before they find a "bad horse" in the process of comprehensive garbage disposal, but at this time it is difficult to claim responsibility, which leads to the "polluter pays" principle in fact is empty words.
The recent Jordan fire has also reminded all walks of life in Hong Kong that there are a large number of "trivial" old tenements in the most prosperous city center in Hong Kong, with chaotic personnel, lack of property services, and unethical behavior, resulting in a large number of public safety risks.
In these places, even property fees are difficult to ensure that the tenants pay in full, and how can the executive power to ensure the implementation of the levy garbage bag system? If the measures to effectively and timely remove the "black sheep" from the institutional level can not be designed, and the implementation level will be discounted for various "objective reasons", then it will form the behavior of "bad money driven away from good money".
Soon, no one will follow the requirements of the levy garbage bag system to do, and the criticism is rife, may the next government will abolish the annoying garbage collection system as a "moral government".
Refer to the garbage disposal policies of representative regions of the world, you can see that their garbage classification, collection of garbage bags and other systems are "devil in the details", often in the geographical environment, the unwritten rules of behavior in the residential community, and institutional protection, etc., to ensure that timely detection, isolation and failure to classify, pack and dispose of garbage according to the system requirements, and minimize the possibility of "black sheep".
For example, in the European Union, Belgium, where I lived, they have long promoted charging garbage bags.
Similar to Japan, Korea and Taiwan, residents have a fixed time to throw garbage (usually early in the morning on certain days), and garbage bags containing garbage should be placed in designated places.
It can be imagined that there is no requirement for garbage bags to be filled with garbage, but the specified bags are filled with garbage that should not be loaded or excessive garbage will be rejected.
The main way of living in the city of Leuven, where the author was at the time, was a single building or an apartment building (but the floor is usually no more than 10 floors, and the residents do not exceed 50 households). Once the garbage bags are found to be not in compliance with the regulations, whether it is the city government or the apartment manager, the difficulty of tracing is not great, and the surrounding residents will actively cooperate.
For example, Japan, Korea and Taiwan are using garbage levies to regulate the classification of citizens and reduce waste. The above areas must use the volume charge, through the use of garbage charging plastic bags to implement polluter pays.
In addition to requiring residents to place garbage (in the correct bag) in the designated location at the specified time, Japanese and Korean garbage bags are more meticulous in sorting.
For example, Japan, which is more familiar to Hong Kong people, requires transparent bags (not limited to specific models but must be transparent, can be tied) to quickly confirm that the garbage classification is correct, and the bag is combustible garbage, plastic, metal cans, etc., or non-recyclable and non-combustible waste.
Recyclable waste paper, etc., does not need to buy a separate garbage bag, but needs to be properly wrapped. Although Japan has a much higher density of living than EU countries, neighbors will pay more attention to not sorting garbage and will not delay the action.
South Korea's recycling rate is also more than 50%, the main reason is the strict classification of garbage bags, different from a kind of paid garbage bags in Hong Kong, South Korea is a variety of paid garbage bags, and each garbage bag can only contain one kind of material, and according to the difficulty of recycling to determine the price of garbage bags, the more difficult the recovery, the higher the price of garbage bags.
As a result, South Korea ’ s recovery rate is higher.
As for the Taiwan region, in addition to adopting a regular garbage collection mode similar to Japan, in the area where there are no conditions to set up a garbage room, there is a garbage truck and recycling truck every night, and the song of the snow truck comes to the small area.
This requirement is even higher, and residents need to actively show up at a specific time, so recycling workers can more accurately and timely eliminate the "black sheep" that do not pack garbage according to regulations, and therefore refuse to accept or take other measures.
It is worth pointing out that I have only visited Japan, Korea and Taiwan on short trips, and only stayed in commercial hotels.
Therefore, details such as the garbage system in residential areas are indirectly obtained through online KOL sharing, live scene dramas and other channels.
Please note that there are errors.
From this, it can be seen that the problems existing in Hong Kong's current waste management system and the waste management experience of advanced regions abroad have produced the following suggestions that deserve serious consideration and reference by the Hong Kong Government and relevant departments:
1. Improve the behavior system of residents throwing garbage.
First of all, the public garbage room and the garbage disposal place in the residential area should no longer be allowed to throw garbage 7x24 hours.
To consider formulating standards, such as limited delivery time and designated delivery points, for the reference of the entire Hong Kong property management industry, the FEHD will implement them to prevent the "black sheep" from evading garbage bag charges.
2. Strengthen the management of "no matter" areas, standardize the premises and methods of refuse collection in areas where property services are lacking, and ensure that the refuse charging system can be effectively implemented even in these problem areas.
3, with reference to the practices of Japan, Korea, Taiwan and other places, after the successful implementation of the garbage collection system, it continues to optimize, the implementation of more detailed garbage classification management, according to different materials and recycling difficulties to carry out differentiated charges.
This will increase the willingness of the environmental protection industry to handle high-difficulty waste, while increasing the residents ’ enthusiasm for sorting and waste reduction.
Critics may think that the institutional construction of these areas requires a long period of time and a large amount of resources to invest, and may not be able to be directly replicated in the real environment of Hong Kong.
Moreover, the improvement of the relevant system requires no small investment of resources.
Perhaps this is precisely the original intention of the SAR Government to levy a "short and fast" garbage levy.
However, it is already clear that the "short and fast" has only attracted doubts, and even if it is forced to push forward, it will also be at the expense of the government's recognition.
Moreover, the "black sheep" can not be effectively eradicated in a timely manner, which will inevitably make the garbage collection system become "half suspended". Only a few able and willing citizens are willing to do so (such as cooperating with "green in the area", and working hard even in the hot sun at the recycling point to deliver their own recyclable plastic waste to the recycling point of respectable citizens). Go your own way, the system cost has been paid a lot, and the problem to be solved by the garbage levy is still the same.
No matter what kind of solution is adopted, the government will need some time to refine the design of the refuse collection system and promote it more vigorously.
The implementation of the principle of garbage collection in the European Union, Japan and Korea, and Taiwan is not completed in three or two months.
Garbage collection needs the long-term cooperation of residents, change the long-term behavior habits can be completed in a few months?
How can this be called good governance and good governance? If you cook for the government, you can't be anxious and work hard for the government for a long time, you can only make a well-intentioned system truly have the positive meaning it should have.
The author is a researcher at the Bauhinia Institute for Policy Studies.
The article is only the opinion of the author and does not represent the position of Hong Kong 01.
Please email us at 01view @ hk01.com.
Please attach the author ’ s real name and contact details.
If not applicable, no notice will be given.

The concept of recycling is seen as a value-added activity that helps create green jobs and strengthen the local economy, making it a shared responsibility among citizens, producers, importers, consumers, and local and central administrations.

The effectiveness of waste sorting and recycling systems in countries like Belgium and South Korea is typically evaluated using performance metrics such as recycling rate, waste diversion rate, and greenhouse gas reduction.

The government plays a crucial role in promoting and implementing effective waste sorting and recycling practices, through policies such as extended producer responsibility, pay-as-you-throw systems, and public education campaigns.

Title:

Content: Bauhinia Party ｜ Refresh Waste Charges
Author: 01 Forum
Published: Updated:
Like most Hong Kong people, I did not have any concept or awareness of garbage collection, until I heard that it was officially implemented on April 1 this year, and I began to pay attention to it.
In fact, the legislation on waste charging has been passed by the Legislative Council as early as August 2021, and the specific provisions of waste charging are actually very simple and clear, that is, based on the "polluter pays" principle, all waste, whether from individuals, families or groups, or according to the pre-purchased designated garbage bags, or according to the weight of the waste, the "entry fee".
As for the government's intention to implement waste charging, it is also very clear and simple, that is, to force the public to reduce waste and recycle through charging, and promote the sustainable development of ecology.
Author ： Zhou Xiaojao
Although the rules are simple and clear, it is not so easy to really land.
In order to pay less, people will try to pack more garbage into garbage bags. How should those crowded garbage bags be tracked and handled? In order to pay less, people will dispose of their garbage in public places such as streets, parks, markets, shopping malls, etc., how should such behavior be identified and enforced? As for the different groups that produce large amounts of waste, as well as the property, cleaning, refuse collection and other organizations that assist in the disposal of waste, a series of countermeasures are also required.
It is in view of the complexity of implementation that the Government has set aside a preparation period of up to 18 months for the formal implementation of the Ordinance.
However, the general public, like the author, did not really start to pay attention to the new policy, which will affect every household, until the first two or three months of its implementation, and there was a lot of uncertainty and doubt. Ming. "
But the question is, is the disruption caused by garbage charges really just a problem of insufficient publicity?
How to deal with garbage is an old problem faced by cities, especially large cities.
Specifically, there are three core issues surrounding the garbage problem: First, how to control the amount of garbage generated? Second, how to encourage the classification of garbage management? Third, how to deal with different types of garbage? The first issue mainly relates to the source of garbage: how to avoid excessive packaging?
How to promote the environmental protection of packaging materials? The second issue relates to the recycling of waste: how to guide the public to separate and collect different types of waste according to the difficulty of recycling? The third issue relates to the fate of waste: simple stacking, centralized landfill or recycling, incineration and power generation?
In response to the above garbage issue, Hong Kong has not made a satisfactory response for a long time, let alone effective action.
The lunch boxes purchased on the street are still foam or plastic that cannot be decomposed. Shopping bags provided by shopping malls are also plastic products, and the goods purchased from the mainland are wrapped in plastic layer after layer.
There was a time when Hong Kong encouraged the classification of kitchen waste and the production of agricultural fertilizer from kitchen waste. Unfortunately, this good practice failed to persist, and the public has not formed a self-awareness of garbage classification.
A large amount of waste has been sent to the countryside to landfill without any sorting. The existing three major landfills are already overwhelmed, and facilities such as waste power generation have taken more than 10 years to start.
Solving the waste problem itself is a systematic project, involving all aspects, coupled with the interests of thousands of households and changes in living habits, so each country in the disposal of the waste issue mostly adopt a gradual, tailored, durable strategy.
Japan is recognized as the best country in terms of waste disposal. The key to its success is the gradual development of a sense of garbage sorting through half a century of sustained efforts and strict laws and regulations.
Mainland China also tries to start with garbage sorting, although there is a strong enforcement force, but the government still dare not play a game of chess across the country, but choose some cities to pilot first, and then gradually push to the whole country.
In contrast, Hong Kong, which has been lagging behind on garbage disposal, naively uses “polluter pays ” as the ultimate“ killer ’ s mace ” in an attempt to “get it done. ”
This mentality is understandable, but can a simple, one-size-fits-all waste charge really solve the waste problem facing Hong Kong?
Can you encourage eco-friendly packaging?
Can you promote garbage separation?
More importantly, can the current waste charging design really reduce the amount of waste generated?
I am afraid the answers to these questions are not as optimistic as the Government thinks.
If Hong Kong ’ s waste challenge is not effectively addressed, then what is the point of this policy, which costs the time and money of all citizens and stakeholders?
For example, in order to make up for the long-term inaction on reclamation, the SAR Government hastily launched the HK $trillion-dollar Lantau Island Construction Project in the absence of full consultation with the community, making it difficult for the project to ride under the current internal and external environment. The awkward situation.
The author is not sure whether garbage collection will also face similar experiences, but if the publicity and communication in the next few months can not convince the community that the relevant garbage collection policy can effectively solve the garbage problem faced by Hong Kong, then it is necessary for the SAR Government to suspend the implementation of the relevant policy, and redesign the plan to be more gradual and targeted, focusing on effectively solving the waste generation, waste management and recycling. A series of policies, and consistent implementation.
In fact, the above doubts about the government ’ s waste charging policy have emerged since the government first introduced the relevant bill to the Legislative Council in 2018.
Although the Bills Committee set up at that time to scrutinize the relevant bills supported the direction of the Government's waste reduction policy, it also made a large number of recommendations on the effective implementation of the relevant policies. Some members even held different views on whether the relevant fees could achieve the preset targets.
The Government has also responded to the views of the Bills Committee, including improving waste reduction and recycling measures and providing assistance to those in need.
Regrettably, these reasonable measures should be perfect in the two years after the passage of the relevant regulations in the preparatory stage either in the form, or the lack of publicity, and ultimately let this in the design of the innate deficiencies, in the landing and inadequate preparation of the waste reduction policy is likely to fall into the eyes of the public "workers hurt money" and abandoned halfway.
The author, Zhou Xiaojui, is a researcher at the Bauhinia Institute for Policy Studies.
The article is only the opinion of the author and does not represent the position of Hong Kong 01.
Please email us at 01view @ hk01.com.
Please attach the author ’ s real name and contact details.
If not applicable, no notice will be given.

The use of advanced technologies, such as smart recycling bins and waste-to-energy facilities, is also an important factor in the effectiveness of waste sorting and recycling systems in these countries.

Overall, the successful implementation of waste recycling systems in countries requires a collaborative effort between local communities, private sectors, and government agencies, with a focus on promoting sustainable practices and providing incentives for participation.