The term "Luddites" historically refers to bands of English textile workers during the early 19th century who destroyed machinery they believed threatened their jobs and livelihoods, especially in cotton and woolen mills.

Crucially, these original Luddites were not simply hostile to technology itself, but resisted the unfair and rapid deployment of new machines that undermined their rights and economic survival.

Their opposition was shaped by the social and economic context of the Industrial Revolution, when mechanization shifted labor demands and displaced skilled artisans, provoking understandable anxiety over job security and control of their work environment .

In the 21st century, the label "Luddite" or "neo-Luddite" has been applied more broadly to individuals or groups resistant to adopting new technologies or ways of working.

Similar to their historical counterparts, modern resistance often arises from concerns about job displacement amid automation, fears over loss of personal control, and worries related to privacy and security.

Ethical and cultural anxieties also play a role, particularly as some technologies—such as artificial intelligence—pose complex questions about societal impact, fairness, and future human roles.

High-profile cautionary voices like Elon Musk and Stephen Hawking have contributed to public unease, reinforcing a climate of skepticism and resistance toward rapid developments in AI .

Resistance today is not only about the outcomes of technological change but also about the process by which these changes occur.

Many people feel excluded from the decision-making regarding the introduction and implementation of new technologies.

The rapid pace of innovation often overwhelms traditional social structures and individual capacities for adaptation, contributing to feelings of disenfranchisement.

Furthermore, technological change is frequently concentrated in the hands of a few large corporate entities holding significant capital, limiting democratization and broader input.

These dynamics foster resentment and skepticism from affected workers who perceive the distribution of benefits and burdens as unfair .

Psychologically, resistance is driven by fear—fear of losing one's livelihood, anxiety about socioeconomic upheaval, and perceived injustice in how technological advances impact different segments of society.

There is often a real or perceived lack of fairness and transparency, with some workers feeling that they bear the costs of change without equitable sharing in gains.

This emotional response can manifest as skepticism or outright opposition to new tools or workflows in the workplace .

Understanding the reasons behind resistance is vital for building a good working relationship with individuals who oppose or are anxious about technological change.

Legitimate fears and concerns should be recognized and validated rather than dismissed.

Clear, empathetic communication that offers support and information can help reduce anxiety.

Involving resistant individuals in change processes increases their sense of control and ownership.

Demonstrating empathy towards the challenges of adaptation and acknowledging the disruption to established comfort zones fosters trust and more cooperative attitudes .

Overall, resistance to new technologies is a recurring historical phenomenon.

The phrase "plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose"—the more things change, the more they stay the same—aptly captures this pattern.

Technological progress continually prompts cycles of hope and apprehension, innovation and resistance, as societies negotiate what adaptation means for work, identity, and social equity .

In summary, the Luddites of the 21st century can be understood as individuals or groups who resist technological change due to complex and legitimate concerns, including fear of job loss, loss of control and agency, privacy and ethical worries, exclusion from decision processes, and perceptions of unfair impact distribution.

Addressing this resistance requires thoughtful, inclusive, and empathetic approaches that recognize these underlying causes rather than framing opposition simply as irrational fear or backwardness.

Such understanding is essential for fostering a friendly and productive workplace atmosphere amid ongoing technological transformation.

The term "Luddites" historically refers to bands of English textile workers during the early 19th century who destroyed machinery they believed threatened their jobs and livelihoods, especially in cotton and woolen mills.

Title:

Content: Does AI make the arts poorer?
The real difference between the rich and the poor is the human mind.
▲ Since we have AI tools, we can do things quickly and well with a simple prompt, and the cost is low. (Illustration / Reuters)
2nd / Podcaster
I had a friend who had been unemployed for a while and asked me if I had a job for him to do, such as simple things like keeping an account and sorting out documents.
I said, if you asked me two years earlier, there must be, but unfortunately not now.
In the past, those chores took time, since the AI tool, as long as the simple prompt can be completed, the monthly fee is only a few hundred yuan, two or three hundred hourly wage students may not do so well.
He listened to me, didn ’ t believe it, and was curious to ask me how I use AI now.
In fact, the application is too broad and too complicated. To make him understand it as soon as possible, I cite my entire workflow as an example.
For example, when writing an article, in the stage of collecting materials, AI helps me to make notes of books / meetings / lectures / courses with speech, and the content is accurate and the grammar is strict. It can also be converted into various forms of charts, different lengths and various articles.
At the writing stage, I will discuss with AI what different topics can be cut into perspective, such as this article I want to know how AI is changing our society, ask it to help me summarize the main views on the Internet, and I will continue to ask for some details, and also ask it to grab the latest data for me.
Next, before po comes to the community, ask it to help me modify the typos and punctuation, the correction only takes a few seconds, and the text creation is basically completed.
I asked my friend, do you think you can do better, faster and cheaper than AI?
▲ AI can help users to take notes with voice, and the content of speech to text is accurate and the grammar is strict. It can also be converted into various forms of charts, different lengths and various articles.
(Chart / CFP)
Next, the image creation.
Now many devices, including WebCam and Monocular, the camera can lock the portrait to move in small amplitude, and even deliberately create a natural hand shake, self-portrait images are becoming more and more dependent on others.
Before the oral video, mainly rely on improvisation or reading, the former plays subtitles until the hand is broken, the latter has to get a reader to adjust the speed, now AI recognition subtitles are very common, the reader also evolved into the script will follow my words run (used readers will know how convenient this is), greatly speeding up the efficiency of recording videos.
It is also a technology derived from AI speech recognition: AI editing. Although it is not completely free from manual work, the editor is now editing by reading the text, without the need to listen with ears, which saves a lot of effort.
Music and images can be generated by AI, saving a lot of time to find materials and reducing the risk of copyright infringement.
As for the job that my friends are looking for, such as document processing and answering e-mail, I just write a SOP file to feed the robot, and it can do it flawlessly, and there is no need to rest for 24 hours.
It doesn ’ t matter if what is said above is not understood, in simple terms, I used to find two or three more people to deal with the process of chores, and it was replaced by AI, and AI did well and fast.
After all, it was all simple work.
▲ Document processing, e-mail and other things, as long as you write a SOP file to feed the robot, it can do flawless, and 24 hours without rest.
(Chart / CFP)
My friend is angry after hearing it.
I said, but I still need someone to help me, because I ’ m saving a lot of time now, have more capacity, and have the opportunity to make more money.
Do you do business sponsorship? Do you write creative scripts that are popular with young people? Do you have experience in IP marketing?
He was frustrated and said that he would not be those, as if he could only be eliminated.
Then he complained to me, saying that Taiwan's industry is serious, only the technology industry can make money, and other people live in deep water.
In fact, every technological innovation is like this, the British textile industry in the 19th century industrialization, a group of textile workers are also very angry at their loss of work, in the factory to destroy the loom.
These people are called Luddites. Now Luddites have become synonymous with opposition to technological progress. Most people also know that Luddites are marginal beings who will eventually die.
But it is obviously not accurate to attribute the fierce competition to the struggle for literature. In the example above, I am also a writer, but my property has leapt with the industrial revolution.
The difference is that I did two things: the first is the investment trend, and the second is that I treat AI as extremely cheap capital and use it to make money.
But I have taken advantage of resources, like I do not mix badly, will mix better, and mixed badly, will only mix worse.
Times change too fast, now this environment can not guarantee that you listen carefully to the classroom to teach those textbooks out of the society to eat, talent needs a flexible brain, as well as a variety of information judgment, to keep up with the pace of faster and faster technological development.
Then it is true that some people can not do, some people from the past to the present, all want to do the simplest job, they either can not find a job, or they have to get a lower salary than the robot.
▲ In the era of rapid technological changes, the advantages of language have been greatly weakened.
(Image from Google Translate)
In fact, education must be reformed as soon as possible, we need new departments, abolish some old departments, and now it seems like the pure language department of the college is really harming students, ensuring that they graduate and lose their jobs. (This sentence is easy to be misunderstood, it seems that I am belittling a particular department, I am not necessary.) And...
In my experience as a minor in Japanese at university, although I can also study culture and history, the advantages of language have been greatly weakened, and the teaching syllabus must be adjusted.)
The gap between the rich and the poor is inevitable, and policies can only try to avoid too many poor people, otherwise there will be social unrest.
Put on the beautiful idea of science fiction, before the civil unrest of mankind, I hope that robots will take care of our food like mothers.
Can you think about it? – I love this post.
Welcome to join the "cloud theory fan group" to see more!
● This article is authorized to be reproduced from the “XIX ” Facebook page.
The above remarks do not represent the position of this website. Welcome to submit "Cloud Theory" to let high-quality good articles be seen by more people, please send to editor88 @ ettoday.net or click here to submit, this website reserves the right to delete the text.
Hot Click 》
► Erotic websites can really be used for united warfare!
You want color, you want health, you don't want to be watched.
► Not "internal waters", not "territorial waters", but "territorial waters".
► Ammunition Preemptive Panic The DPP may be the initiator of the war.
► Can Singapore ’ s 3-Day Weekend Pass Taiwan ’ s Work-Time Revolution?
Share with friends:
Follow us
Back to the top.

Crucially, these original Luddites were not simply hostile to technology itself, but resisted the unfair and rapid deployment of new machines that undermined their rights and economic survival.

Title:

Content: Brian Merchant, author: “Luddites are more dangerous to the rich than Robin Hood”

The Luddites have been a great historical resource. Any showy enemy of anything that looked like technological progress has been called a Luddite. Today with generative artificial intelligence and its critics, the word has been revived. The author and journalist Brian Merchant (Iowa City, USA, 1983) saw it coming and has written a book that reviews the Luddite revolt in England at the beginning of the 19th century and its similarities with current technologies: Blood in the Machine (Blood in the Machine, currently without a planned edition in Spanish) thus explores the origins of the current revolt against big technology.

Although the book has appeared in the midst of the AI hype, Merchant began his research a decade ago: “Uber was growing and it was beginning to be seen that it was having a hard impact on taxi drivers, I heard the term Luddite from the pro-Uber sector and wrote an article titled You don't understand anything about Luddites”. Now in his book he remembers that the Luddite revolt was a labor struggle, not anti-technology, at a time when unions were prohibited. In a conversation with EL PAÍS from his residence in Los Angeles, Merchant clarifies the historical impact of the Luddites and the possible similar struggles that are being played today in Silicon Valley.

1. The Luddites were not against progress

The labor revolt over the loss of rights was more important than the destruction of textile machines: “The biggest mistake about the Luddites is to say that they were against technology and progress,” says Merchant. “They were against certain technologies because they recognized the way in which they were going to be used in their context against them as workers. It was a labor movement, against poverty, not anti-technology. The British Government began to mold them in this way almost immediately, it was keen to mock the Luddites and present the argument that they were against progress. It is very similar to how today people in positions of power in technology companies accuse those who complain about poor working conditions. It's the same story for 200 years.”

The book quotes a phrase from historian Eric Hobsbawm that explains this stage: “It was collective bargaining through riots.” According to Merchant, this tactic in a workers' struggle was very powerful for two reasons: “First, it was symbolic because everyone understood that what they were destroying was not just a machine. It was also the specific machine used to transfer wealth from the workers to the employer. Second, it was useful because they destroyed the equipment that businessmen needed.”

2. Why Robin Hood is better accepted than Ned Ludd

Ned Ludd was a legendary character. No one knows for sure if he existed. It was the legend of a teenager who would have broken the first machines at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. In 1811, rebellious workers used his legendary name to sign letters and further scare: “Ludd probably never existed. But the incarnation of it would become a mascot, an organizational tool, a wink: a powerful 19th-century meme,” Merchant writes.

See also  The Commander of the Land Forces meets in Muscat a number of Omani military leaders

Ludd lived near Nottingham (United Kingdom), like another legendary figure who has been better treated by history. There must be a reason, says Merchant: “The Luddites organized a popular and powerful rebellion. People wrote popular songs about them. They were like Robin Hood. But it is interesting that Robin Hood has endured as a positive light, while the Luddites have not. He suggests that the myth of Ned Ludd is in some ways more dangerous to the elites and the wealthy than that of Robin Hood, which is a little more nebulous and open. The Luddites say: go ahead and break the machines of your oppression. Robin Hood says: steal from the rich and give to the poor. “I think that’s a little more tolerable.”

3. How are they similar to today's problems?

The background of the book is that the history of the Luddites is similar to what happens today in Silicon Valley, where a small group of corporations dominate new technologies. “The way technologies are developed has basically not changed. You have a handful of people with access to enough capital or political influence to be able to build a factory and use automation technologies. “Back then, the most aggressive owners didn’t ask anyone how to find a way to make this a win-win.”

Merchant has received criticism for equating the great businessmen of 19th century England with 21st century America. But there are details that he does not see that far away: “The technology development process is in some ways even more undemocratic today than then. There is this immense pool of capital available to Silicon Valley innovators through venture capital. Uber wasn't profitable for 10 years, but they had access to that capital. Did anyone really like that? Did it work for workers and delivery people? Nothing mattered, they just had more money and moved on.”

See also  Just the mystery

Their opposition was shaped by the social and economic context of the Industrial Revolution, when mechanization shifted labor demands and displaced skilled artisans, provoking understandable anxiety over job security and control of their work environment .

In the 21st century, the label "Luddite" or "neo-Luddite" has been applied more broadly to individuals or groups resistant to adopting new technologies or ways of working.

Similar to their historical counterparts, modern resistance often arises from concerns about job displacement amid automation, fears over loss of personal control, and worries related to privacy and security.

Ethical and cultural anxieties also play a role, particularly as some technologies—such as artificial intelligence—pose complex questions about societal impact, fairness, and future human roles.

Title:

Content: Alert
1.2 million doses of Modena are ready for the 24th vaccine.
Memoirs of the world ’ s first semi-robot
I am not going to die, but will evolve.
When the body and the machine become one, can man be truly free?
In 2017, Peter was diagnosed with asymptomatic disease, a deadly disease that lasts only two years on average.
However, he does not want to be like any other asymptomatic patient, but can only be painfully disabled until he dies. He chooses to think of himself as a white rat under the development of high-tech, and let technology replace his losing speech, movement and sensory abilities, becoming "Peter 2.0" - the first complete cyborg (semi-robot) in history.
This book, I Am Cyber-Peter 2.0, chronicles his life after he learned from his illness, and is also a book of courage, a book of technology, and a book of love.
by Peter Scott-Morgan
Protect the Fire of Hope
Because my voice had become so weak, I had to invite nearly 30 people to sit close to me in the large conference room at the EISS Innovation Centre in London.
I ’ ve spoken to a lot of big companies before, and only two of them have shown enough courage and leadership (or commitment and social responsibility?) to actually show up at the conference.
But even if there are only two large companies, the preparation for our two days to start the operation of the foundation is enough.
Of course, there were people who attended Else Information Technology, and the internationally renowned Intel company even sent a representative to the meeting – the team that worked with Stephen Hawking.
People from the Cellophane Company are also on board, along with Ester ’ s colleagues, as well as many experts involved in the production of virtual avatars, and a few key people who are critical to the foundation ’ s operations.
This is the first day of the two days of preparation, and we are ready to start the whole two days of non-stop work, incinerating the dials - both days have to be busy from 8: 00 in the morning to 8: 00 in the evening - I have to make things go smoothly.
More importantly, I must prepare for the future and keep the Foundation on track as much as possible.
Everyone in the conference room slid their chairs toward me, and I encouraged them to sit as close as possible until everyone could hear me at a volume that sounded like I was whispering.
And then I opened:
“Welcome to the inaugural meeting of the Scott-Morgan Foundation! The next two days are your last chance to hear my voice.
In order to highlight this milestone in life, I intend to make an opening statement for everyone, connecting everything from the past to the future.
In August 1984, almost 35 years ago, I published my first book: The Robot Revolution.
When I published this book, I had a great disagreement with my editor (and the professor who reviewed it) about the end of the book.
I predict the future in the book; but I am not smart enough to predict the future is so close that I should be alive when this prediction actually happens, and may prove my prediction wrong!
For me at the time, 50 years later was a very, very distant future. ”
As explained to Francis, I continue to share my concern that humanity is about to face a fork in the road, as I predicted long ago, and that we are now unwittingly choosing the wrong path, all the way to the independent development of artificial intelligence (there is a great possibility that humanity will eventually be left far behind), rather than welcoming the future of human-AI collaboration.
If humans and artificial intelligence can work together, it will allow us to accomplish things that are difficult for both humans and artificial intelligence alone.
“I never thought that in a few decades I ’ d want to reread my book. ”
When I reread the last paragraph, I have to say that the universe really played a big joke on me, when I casually used the word "extremely fragile body" in the book, and now look at my body, which can not even be picked up by the book, it makes me smile.
So I asked Andrew to read it aloud for everyone. "
Hearing my instructions, my nephew Andrew became the focus of the spotlight, and he began to read aloud:
“If we really go down the road of ‘ amplifying human intelligence ’, it ’ s possible to keep humans and robots in the same evolutionary branch, rather than watching robots leave humans in the process of evolution. ”
If reality follows this trajectory, humans will one day be able to replace their extremely fragile bodies, survive in more permanent machines, and use supercomputers to amplify human intelligence.
And I went on:
“Thirty-five years after this book was published, everyone here now has the opportunity to move the future in this direction, and we are the best representatives of what Jerry said was ‘ on the front line of change ’ … If the future happens, there is no way to make it up!
But we all know that if this is a Hollywood blockbuster — and one day our story is bound to become a blockbuster — this is the moment when things get tougher and the stakes start to increase.
After all the out-of-frame conversations, endless thrills, great ideas, and empty promises, the true heroes of the origin story — who have the stamina, their strengths, and their boundless enthusiasm to make a real difference — are finally here.
The heroes of this story are the people in front of me, and the other members of the resistance who will be physically present in a few hours, or in electronic communications.
We are the power of change! We are the core members of this resistance.
Now is the critical moment.
We have to fight the status quo, we have to change what it means to be human, and our vision is that by working with artificial intelligence, we can liberate all people and live on — even people like me can survive — but if we don ’ t succeed in taking the next step, it ’ s over.
The reason is very simple.
No one else in the world can do what we are doing; no one else in the world is trying to do what we are trying to do.
Contrary to the vision we pursue, the status quo we are about to fight is very strong; the future we are trying to reverse has been shaped by a large part of the wrong ending.
The real reason that the process will be so difficult is that our greatest challenge is not the limitations of technology – although the limitations of technology are also huge obstacles – in fact, our most powerful enemy is the human psyche.
We must have heard the negative comments of the news media, Hollywood movies, worried celebrities, and the general public that artificial intelligence is about to attack humanity.
So we must create another possibility, another way of solving the problem; let me boldly set the tone for it — a new hope.
Although we are just now taking the first step in this new direction, we have already seen those in the establishment retreat, who feel uncomfortable about having to face technology they don ’ t understand.
We have also seen many companies and many people choose to remain silent and watch, and they do not want to participate in these affairs openly, only to wait for the changes, but also feel anxious about not being able to fully grasp the situation, on the one hand, worry about the risk of damage to their reputation, but do not understand the impact of these things on themselves.
I know the mood of these people, I really do.
That's what they are.
But we're not like that.
After careful selection, I know that everyone sitting has the ability to change the world.
Take your precious time from your daily work, contribute your precious talents, and work with others to achieve our common goals.
Some of them — not just the awesome Jerry and EasyTech — are using their courage and leadership to publicly stand up for our actions on behalf of their companies, to help break the social status quo, and to prove that no matter what the universe throws at us, we can embrace change and use it to lead the way to a future that will last forever.
Starting today and ending tomorrow, we have the opportunity to show the world a different path to the future, one that can avoid human threats and be more secure – as Jerry recently wrote: “Human beings provide background, common sense, and creativity, and artificial intelligence helps to flourish. ”
"That's what we're going to do.
We want to make a strong case for all of humanity, not just talk, we want to know and do it! We want to make results and do it for the world to see.
It ’ s also important that we use our vision, willingness to take on difficult situations, and practical action to ensure that all of these efforts will survive long after we leave the world.
We want to incorporate this spirit into this unique research institution in the form of a charitable foundation.
The official goal of our charitable foundation is precisely the dream that brought us together in the first place: to ethically use artificial intelligence, virtual reality, augmented reality, robotics, and other high-tech systems to improve behavior and health for all groups of people who are physically restricted by age, disease, disability, and other physical and mental illnesses.
Against this background, our foundation was founded to explicitly and openly harness the power of innovation so that humans can live well in the event of a change in their lives — even if it ’ s due to the onset of asymptomatic disease.
Eight weeks before I can no longer speak on my own, I will have to rely on the technology developed by the Foundation.
But what we ’ re going to do over the next two days is important not just to me, but to everyone with severe physical disabilities and, ultimately, to each of us.
Of course, our foundation will become a beacon of hope, illuminating the way forward for all who can ’ t see hope, and inspiring the progress and direction of AI development around the world.
The more our fire of hope burns, the more people will be willing to join the ranks and make the fire more dazzling and moving.
But let ’ s not forget that we are the ones who are responsible for this fire of hope, and at the heart of this fire of hope will always be humanity and our humanity.
I know that we will have many major setbacks in the next two days; I know that we will panic when we find that there is a huge gap in our thinking; I know that we will be tired and make mistakes, but it doesn ’ t matter.
We are just about to embark on a beautiful journey. We don ’ t have to rush to perfect everything at this time, just take the first step toward a bright future.
I am very proud to be able to join you on this journey, and I would like to thank you all for choosing to join me on this adventure. "
This article is excerpted from “I Am Cyberberg – Peter 2.0 ” by Facebook.
Vision Hollywood Facebook Publishing Reading Windball
Extended reading
Is it a unique person or a good partner for humans? 2022 New “Social ” Study of Cats
Will humanity be extinct?
"Jurassic World: Dominating the World" is Coming Soon
The Queen fulfills her son's wish, and Camilla will become Queen!
Andrew Garfield lied to himself, lied to Emma Stone, played Spider-Man, and was called an asshole.
Related News
Chen Ming-pang ’ s new book, “My Young Master ’ s Time, ” looks back on life with sincere writing!
Chen Ming Pun The name of a man - under a cherry tree, a passer-by, feeling desolate and dry.
Wu Xianghui, famous for writing "The Boy Who Rejected the Joint Entrance Examination", sometimes had shocking remarks. Once, in order to write the book "Farewell to Korea", he went to Korea and stayed in a hotel.
This book, let you put yourself in place - "Tell me, what have you suffered?"
My friend is sick.
And she came to ask for help, but it was a difficult question: accompany me to the end.
The woman agreed, but did not think that this was a completely lonely adventure, because - even if you found the most peaceful and quiet beauty of life; even if you can have mutual fun, support, share the taste of close food reading images, chat memories together; even if they can share the same time; until the end of the day, she and her sick friend, will still be alone, Faced with their own completely different adventures...
But until then, there is still a lot to remember, the mind, the struggle, the laughter, the foolishness... and the pain of watching others suffer, and even though there is so much suffering, it will finally be laid out and revealed in the timid question, "Tell me, what have you suffered?".
The history that cannot be learned in textbooks is hidden in the history of China that has been disappeared!
Five thousand years of Chinese history as the content, vivid, lively, interesting vernacular description, the most beautiful, the best understand Chinese history story!
From prehistory, faith history era into the historical era, full of great stories, the ancestors with Titus to conquer the four neighbors, establish dynasties, from the three emperors, Yao Shun Yu Tang to the establishment of the Zhou Dynasty, and the great powers to divide the dynasty.
Read ancient texts, learn modern writing! Let Tao Yuanming teach you how to write "Creative Autobiography"
"My name is × × ×, was born in......, parents are......" Many people write autobiographies, are written according to this pattern, although the four stable, the writing has been written, but it is a bit boring to read, if you want to stand out from the many works, it is necessary to use a special way.
At this time, "telling a story" comes in handy! Although it is writing an autobiography of a character, it is still necessary to tell your own "story" as if you were writing a story.
You can use the characteristics of writing a story to add emotions and express ideas in your autobiography; or, like writing a novel, have orgasms and turns, and display creativity and humor.
In the distant Jin Dynasty, Tao Yuanming demonstrated for us the creative autobiography, even if viewed from a modern perspective, it will not be outdated.
Now let ’ s enjoy the ancient texts and write to Tao Yuan Ming.
Memoirs of the world ’ s first semi-robot
I am not going to die, but will evolve.
When the body and the machine become one, can man be truly free?
In 2017, Peter was diagnosed with asymptomatic disease, a deadly disease that lasts only two years on average.
However, he does not want to be like any other asymptomatic patient.
When you ’ re at work, you ’ re still talking to your friends in Japanese? Just change a sentence and you ’ ll be able to turn your impressions around!
Courtesy of the Japanese is necessary.
When communicating in the workplace, is your limited vocabulary not enough to fully express your ideas, or not enough respect? Japanese communication expert Takao Saito ’ s book “Japanese Vocabulary in the Workplace ” takes you through“ Upgrading Daily Conversations ”, “Inviting Others ”,“ Replacing Difficult Words ”, “Communicating Ideas ”,“ Not Repeating the Same Words ” and “Making Meetings Smooth ” Learn how to change words, replace straight words, and smoothly avoid any situations that may offend the other party.
Product recommendation
udn Forum

High-profile cautionary voices like Elon Musk and Stephen Hawking have contributed to public unease, reinforcing a climate of skepticism and resistance toward rapid developments in AI .

Title:

Content: The new is the old well forgotten.
Where in the Network there was a fashionable insult to the opponents of AI
In the Internet discourse, deep in the study of sarcastic comments of anonymous persons, you can find the term "Luddite".
This label is often referred to as people who dare to express the slightest inclination to inhibit the constant development of artificial intelligence (AI).
Related video
Interestingly, such prominent figures as Elon Musk, Stephen Hawking and Bill Gates have been awarded the Luddite Award, which is recognition of their cautionary position regarding the potential dangers associated with artificial intelligence.
During the ceremony, Robert D. Atkinson, the organizer of the award, noted: “Unfortunately, luminaries such as Elon Musk and Stephen Hawking have contributed to the feverish refraction of hands about the impending apocalypse of artificial intelligence, ” writes IFLScience.
In Focus.Technology appeared its own Telegram-channel.
Subscribe not to miss the latest and exciting news from the world of science!
Atkinson also explained: "Do we consider any of them personally Luddites?
No, of course not.
They are pioneers of science and technology.
But they and others have done a disservice to the public — and undoubtedly have helped and comforted the increasingly common neo-Luddist impulse in modern society — by demonizing AI in the popular imagination.
But how did the term come about?
Its roots can be traced back to the early 1800s in England.
Before the industrial revolution, skilled craftsmen who knew a lot about textile production made clothes using their own machines and specialized tools.
However, a situation arose when new technologies and methods of mass production appeared, as a result of which artisans were unable to compete.
The result was a movement whose purpose was the destruction of the textile industry and the destruction of new machines.
Although there is some truth to this story, it does not reflect the whole essence of the Luddite movement.
Their actions were not driven solely by a reaction to new technologies; rather, they were a response to the profound transformations taking place in their professional activities.
While it is true that they often attacked a knitting machine known as a stocking frame, as well as other mechanized fixtures, their main concern was the labor practices associated with these machines.
Kevin Binfield, editor of the Luddite and Compassionate Works, explained their motives: "They simply wanted machines to produce high-quality goods, and that these machines employed workers who had been trained and received fair wages.
It was their only concern. ”
The nickname "Luddites" comes from the nickname "Ned Ludd", an apocryphal figure who allegedly sabotaged a textile factory in 1779, although historical evidence suggests that this man was most likely a fictional one.
In a 2007 paper, researcher David Linton explained: “Some say that a young man, possibly with cognitive impairment, named Ned Ludd once misunderstood an order and accidentally broke his frame machine.
Others argue that this was done deliberately, in a fit of anger.
Whatever the motive, it seems to have become a joke phrase that whenever the machine breaks, for whatever reason, you can say something like, "Ludd must have been here."
From this construction, it is a short step to the ironic application of the name Ludd to vandalism for political purposes. "
Between 1811 and 1816, the Luddite movement held sporadic and somewhat unorganized protests, characterized by the destruction of cars and the burning of factories.
In response, the mill owners resorted to extreme measures, using deadly force against the Luddites.
In April 1812, there was a grim turning point in Huddersfield, where at least four people died at the hands of the mill owners.
In retaliation, the Luddites killed the owner of the mill, William Horsfall, who boldly declared his intention to "smear himself with Luddite blood to the saddles."
Horsfall was shot while sitting on his horse.
Faced with these uprisings, the government immediately sent thousands of soldiers to quell the protests.
Moreover, they adopted a law according to which the breakdown of cars was subject to the death penalty or sending to colonies.
Subsequently, the movement dissipated, but the stable expression "Luddite" could not accurately convey the ideals and goals of the Luddites.
Previously, Focus wrote about the first IPSO in the history of mankind.
It turns out that it was invented in Babylon and it concerns the Flood.

Resistance today is not only about the outcomes of technological change but also about the process by which these changes occur.

Title:

Content: Overcoming The Noble Lie: Great Narratives & Compelling Futures

From New Dawn Special Issue Vol 15 No 6 (Dec 2021)

If the last two years taught us anything, it’s that humanity is now at its most critical inflection point. We stand at the precipice of a major turning in western civilisation – the culmination of a millennium of human development, seminal events, knowledge, and culture.

It is undeniable, yet not at all clear, the direction we are headed, or what the future holds, and who will be around to see it come to fruition. We are not seers or prophets and cannot peer into the future, but we can read the signposts of the past and present.

We have a wealth of shared experience and a vast living memory – a collective consciousness updated and added to every day. If we search humanity’s archive, we find answers to many of these questions. Those answers have always been available, gleaned from understanding ourselves, our journey as a family, and the human race.

French novelist Alphonse Karr famously coined the saying, “plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose,” or, the more things change, the more they are the same.

Yes, we have been here before.

Let’s step back to the late 19th and early 20th centuries – a time of upheavals and period of great turbulence on many human fronts – politically, spiritually, and technologically. The western world was in the midst of an existential crisis as secularisation brought with it two disruptive forces to the traditional order of knowledge and influence: the rise of the intellectual and mass media.

It is perhaps no coincidence that the world finds itself in a very similar impasse approximately a century later, with many of the same conditions present today, only on a much more pervasive level.

The parallels between then and now are astonishing. This should not be viewed as ‘history repeating itself’ but rather as a more intense interlude of what had already come to pass – only this time events are unfolding at much greater speed, propelled by advances in communication technology on a global scale inconceivable to previous generations. Such changes were equally profound in 1900, as were the transformations that took place across society.

As the 20th century approached, theology was supplanted by evolutionary science. An ascendant Darwinian authority presided over existential questions like “Who are we?” and “What is man’s purpose?”

Undoubtedly, this was a tumultuous time, intellectually and spiritually, with acrimony leading to heated exchanges between clergy and scientists, even leading to violent confrontations. But, with its newfound status, it was inevitable the secular power of Darwinian science would colonise the political and social sciences before giving rise to the sordid science of curative breeding known as eugenics.

Recent history leaves no doubt that if left unrestrained by morals and ethics, wanton destruction and incredible suffering are wrought in the name of science and progress. These forces of modernity materialise in today’s advances in genetic engineering that have brought us back to that point once again: humanity faces the dilemma of resisting game-changing advances of technology and innovation or surrendering to it and prostrating at the altar of science and progress.

We are an entire century into a fully secularised society in the West. Today’s tech gurus, vaccinologists, and public health officials now occupy positions of prestige and command the reverence once reserved for pontiffs, philosophers, and poet laureates. The divine mysteries have given way to the ‘divine’ algorithm, and timeless sublime prose to the transience of the latest epidemiological model – from Gandhi to Gates, Whitman to Whitty, in just a few generations. How else could a man like Dr Anthony Fauci, an 80-year-old career gatekeeper for the transnational pharmaceutical cartel, still occupy the US government’s highest-paid job, and recently voted People Magazine’s “sexiest man alive”? Albert Camus once said, “Nothing is more despicable than respect based on fear.” Indeed, if not for the wave of mass hysteria and fear that swept over the world in February 2020, few would even know of Dr Fauci, let alone revere him as a demigod. On one level, we may be deluded into believing that today’s gaudy exhibitionists are mere frivolities of pure media spectacle, but behind the facade of political celebrity is an unforgiving ideology called technocracy.

You will often hear the trope that “more people have been killed over religion than anything else.” If only it were true. The 20th century serves as a potent reminder of the misleading nature of that statement, for no other century witnessed the sheer brutality and crimes against humanity on an industrial scale perpetrated in the name of various despotic interpretations of some variant of social Darwinism or political science, reaching levels of totalitarianism never seen before in human history. There are too many examples: WWI, WWII, Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia, Maoist China, Cambodia, Vietnam, Central America, Afghanistan, and Iraq, to name only a few. In almost every instance, the preservation of secular dogma took precedence over the lives and souls of humans who were unfortunate enough to be caught in the crossfire of ‘progress’. Fascism, socialism, communism, neoliberal capitalism – each would justify collateral damage as a means to achieving the goal of transformation or the formulation of a new order.

In the 21st century, the forces that inherited the mantle of power – the dynastic families and special interests – are preparing the next act in this worldly saga.

The Grand Narrative

So often it’s been said that in war, history is written by the victors, who impose what is known as the ‘living memory’ of a nation or people, chronicling a shared experience, generally of collective sacrifice undertaken for the greater good, and paying tribute to the martyrs along the way. These become the narratives that post-war orders and worldviews are built upon, a central pillar around which the reorganisation of society and economies occurs. Without marshalling the “narrative,” a ruling establishment cannot lead and steer society in its direction of choice.

What happens in the absence of a bona fide world war? Can elites still construct an equally compelling living memory which the people can rally around?

Grand narrative management is precisely what Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum (WEF) has been attempting from the onset of the ‘global pandemic’ crisis. In 2021, the WEF announced its “Great Narrative” initiative, although evidence for this project can be traced much further back through a number of their documents and website presentations.

To create the requisite living memory, Schwab and the WEF replaced the usual military war piece with the new war on microbes. “The pandemic has revealed the acute need to focus on the future and long-term health of our societies,” said the globalist luminary.

While the rhetoric sounds innocuous, everything we’ve witnessed over the last 24 months proves beyond any doubt that their hyper-centralised ‘public health’ planning has little to do with the health of the individual and more about how the individual can be more effectively managed to serve the collective, that in turn is to be administered by the new technocracy. The WEF is merely the latest avatar for this elitist ideology whose primary goal is always to meet the ruling oligarchy’s financial and consolidation goals and objectives. This was true 100 years ago as it is today.

Just as with the global financial crash in 2008, when elites privatised their profits and socialised their losses through gargantuan government bailouts, so too will elites seek to consolidate their baronial individual asset wealth portfolios and privileged asset classes while demanding infinite self-sacrifice for everyone else – all for the greater good, of course. It is also about managing expectations, as the WEF states:

“The Great Narrative Meeting [in November 2021] is a linchpin of the Great Narrative initiative, a collaborative effort of the world’s leading thinkers to fashion longer-term perspectives and co-create a narrative that can help guide the creation of a more resilient, inclusive and sustainable vision for our collective future.”

You might be asking: what is their endgame? Put simply, every new world order needs a financial reset, and in the WEF’s Great Reset, the plan is to intentionally overinflate and collapse the current fiat money system, reimagined and replaced by a new globalised economic system backed by a new superficial asset class under the guise of the “financialisation of nature.”

That plan gained a significant foothold in October 2021 when the Rockefeller Foundation and the New York Stock Exchange announced the creation of a new asset class that will effectively monetise the natural world as well as the processes underpinning all life. All in the name of “sustainability.” The lifeblood of this system will be a new Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) which will be fully programmable, meaning that the currency issuer can stipulate how the digital money is spent.

This is the highest form of social engineering conceivable and can become the payment mechanism for Universal Basic Income, allowing the government issuer power over what you are allowed to purchase. It could limit your transactions to green spending and ‘carbon-neutral’ activities. It’s also a system designed to eliminate upward mobility unless you gain promotion through the political economy.

It could lead to the ultimate victory of the technocracy. However, its Achilles heel might be that it seeks to remake the world in such a short space of time, presumably so these masters of the universe can marvel at their ‘remarkable achievements’ in this lifetime – the ultimate act of hubris by these self-anointed stewards of the planet.

When the technocracy movement first emerged in the early 20th century, contemporary thinkers raised the alarm that pseudo-intellectualism and the mechanised worldview augured an eventual collapse of western civilisation. The timeframe wasn’t clear, only that it was inevitable. In his historical literary work, The Decline of the West (1928), Oswald Spengler described the event horizon that eventually consumes all major cultures, and which generally have a limited lifespan of roughly one thousand years. He examined eight major civilisations as examples: the Babylonians, Egyptians, Chinese, Indian, Greco-Roman, Mayan-Aztec, Arabian, and European-Western. He envisioned the West being consumed by its intellectual vortex:

Today we live so cowed under the bombardment of this intellectual artillery, the media, that hardly anyone can attain to the inward detachment that is required for a clear view of the monstrous drama. The will-to-power operating under a pure democratic disguise has finished off its masterpiece so well that the object’s sense of freedom is actually flattered by the most thorough-going enslavement that has ever existed.

Now realise what is at stake. The unconstrained vision of Davos elites may become the final revolution within a larger civilisational cycle. The Covid-19 pseudo-pandemic would be one of the catalysing events in this process, followed by global cyberwar, and then finally ending in something more outrageous like a nuclear conflagration before ushering in a New World Order.

Such a protracted multi-phased upheaval would mark the end of the main features of modern western civilisation: the post-Westphalian nation-state, the era of enlightenment and rational thought, self-governing democracy and republican forms of government. The world would move into what Zbigniew Brzezinski called a Technetronic Era. Compared to the 20th century, this would more resemble a centralised command and control economy and a highly automated society. In terms of individual rights, it would look like a neo-feudal dark age.

This cycle was discussed by American writers William Strauss and Neil Howe in their book The Fourth Turning (1997), which illustrated how the development of Anglo-American society is a feature of a much larger centuries-old cycle. Or, as Italian commentator Federico Dezzanidescribes it, “like a snake biting its own tail over the span of a century, Anglo-American societies are born, grow, mature and die, only to rise again and begin a new cycle.”

The Noble Lie

In the end, it all comes back to Malthus – Malthusianism – which is ultimately the ideological standard hoisted by the likes of Schwab, Bill Gates, Stanley Johnson, Prince Charles, and globalist outfits like the Trilateral Commission. These elites believe that the people must bear the brunt of this epic existential predicament of an overcrowded planet in a state of terminal decline due to man and his industrial exploits, which is said to be driving anthropogenic global warming to the point where Earth will be uninhabitable. To save humanity from itself, we must be forced to accept that there are too many of us, so we play their globalist game of musical chairs. We know what they mean, but they won’t state their intentions openly, not yet anyway. Only it’s not true.

In Plato’s Republic, in the dialogue of the myth of the metals (social castes), Socrates explains that to maintain order and social continuity, the ruling class must act under the aegis of “the noble lie.” This is based on the belief that from time to time, the ruling class must feed the general populace an ennobling fiction to maintain order and continuity. The noble lie is noble because it benefits the soul of the person who believes it. From an elite’s perspective, this is done for their own good and that they might feel better about their station in life.

If you think about our living memory, or what happened in the West over the last half-century, it’s been a continuum of such lies, although hardly noble: the assassination of JFK, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, Saddam’s WMDs, 19 Arab hijackers on 9/11, spreading freedom and democracy in Afghanistan, overpopulation, climate chaos, Trump-Russian collusion, Covid-19, the Great Reset, and soon it will be the coming war on China. Each epic yarn spun with the help of a 24/7 mainstream and social media barrage of propaganda and misinformation. By brainwashing the population incessantly, the establishment creates the illusion of a ‘bottom-up consensus’, so much so that the people believe they’ve collectively arrived at a grassroots consensus.

Drifting out noble lies in the 21st century has become a pretty efficient process with the consensus enforced by digital dragnet: dare oppose any noble liedeployed by the globalist caste for your own good to ‘reimagine’ and reorganise socio-economic systems, and you’re treated the same as a blasphemer in medieval times – silenced, excommunicated, banished from view, and no longer permitted to speak in the public commons. Deplatformed, depersoned, cancelled.

At the same time, however, a very real great awakening is also taking hold with a rising level of political and conscious awareness much broader and wide-ranging than anything before in human history. This is a consequence of the same global panopticon wielded against the people by the elites. Such awareness is the prerequisite to ultimate liberation, or as philosopher G.I. Gurdjieff once said, “If you wish to get out of prison, the first thing you must do is realise that you are in prison. If you think you are free, you can’t escape.”

Which brings us back to the philosophical and existential question: why are we here? What is the purpose of humans on this planet? Darwinian genetic science says we are here to promulgate our genes and advance the species. On a fundamental level, this is what makes us human. But the new green technocracy says this is no longer possible, and we must embrace a higher truth – a new altruism imbued in the Great Reset doctrine.

The irony is that collectively speaking, humanity might not survive this new ‘empty planet’ initiative. Elite technocrats will contend that only a planned society modelled after Huxley’s vision of a technocracy organised by functional castes and selective breeding in vitro can save the planet from the alleged existential menace of human consumption and climate change.

Whose compelling future is this? Is this not the ‘scientific dictatorship’ that H.G. Wells foresaw, with a global government run by an elite committee of scientists and technocrats who hold the reins of power over every aspect of life and dictate how society is organised and run minute to minute? This is unconstrained totalitarianism. Under such a system, the individual will have no agency, no conscience, and eventually no soul.

The last 250 years have been an extraordinary progression from monarchies to democratic nations, in which the state eventually assumed a god-like status. It set the stage for what is heading towards us now: the advent of globalist transhumanism and a one-world unified state.

Far from being its crowning victory, this crescendo of technocracy and the perversion of ‘progress’ exposes how materialism and the scientific priesthood cannot satisfactorily answer the fundamental questions we’ve asked since time immemorial, those eternal questions and divine mysteries pursued by monks, sages, and sannyasi. The forces of modernity cannot resolve this predicament, so people are left searching for something more grounded – where through the natural world they may also know the supernatural. Once again, people reach for religion and spirituality to find meaning and purpose, including (and not surprising as one may think) the younger generation.

We should be under no illusion about the challenges lying before us. But even beyond an awareness of what you face, you need to have a vision of a world you wish to live in. Elites have always been adept at occupying the minds of the people with propaganda, and the latest war or catastrophe, so we never settle long enough to formulate our vision of a compelling future. Instead, our vision is mired in a never-ending procession of reactive emotions, leaving us vulnerable to the power of suggestion – and a ‘compelling future’ is instead continually served up to us by our rulers. They create the problem (a noble lie) that elicits our reaction before they present us with a solution to which there is usually no alternative.

Make no mistake: the great and the good in Davos are busy designing your ‘compelling future’, and if no other counter-narrative is offered, they will decide your future for you. It’s that simple.

Qui tacet consentit. Translated: your silence is your consent.

There is still much work to be done, but the work is never done. Throughout time, this has always been the case. The more things change, the more they are the same.

This article was published in New Dawn Special Issue Vol 15 No 6.
If you appreciate this article, please consider a contribution to help maintain this website.

Footnotes

1. Albert Camus (1963), quote from “Carnets: 1935-1942”
2. Wall Street’s New Asset Class Will Put Natural World ‘Up for Sale’, childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/wall-street-new-york-stock-exchange-natural-asset-company
3. Federico Dezzani, www.geopolitica.ru/en/article/covid-destruction-institutions-and-beyond
4. What is a Noble Lie?, kenyonreview.org/2007/02/what-is-a-noble-lie/

© New Dawn Magazine and the respective author.
For our reproduction notice, click here.

About the Author

Author Patrick Henningsen is the founder and editor of the news and analysis website 21st Century Wire, and is an independent foreign and political affairs analyst for RT International. He is also the host of the SUNDAY WIRE radio program which airs live every Sunday on the Alternate Current Radio Network. Learn more about this author at: www.patrickhenningsen.com

Author Archive Page

Many people feel excluded from the decision-making regarding the introduction and implementation of new technologies.

The rapid pace of innovation often overwhelms traditional social structures and individual capacities for adaptation, contributing to feelings of disenfranchisement.

Furthermore, technological change is frequently concentrated in the hands of a few large corporate entities holding significant capital, limiting democratization and broader input.

These dynamics foster resentment and skepticism from affected workers who perceive the distribution of benefits and burdens as unfair .

Psychologically, resistance is driven by fear—fear of losing one's livelihood, anxiety about socioeconomic upheaval, and perceived injustice in how technological advances impact different segments of society.

There is often a real or perceived lack of fairness and transparency, with some workers feeling that they bear the costs of change without equitable sharing in gains.

This emotional response can manifest as skepticism or outright opposition to new tools or workflows in the workplace .

Understanding the reasons behind resistance is vital for building a good working relationship with individuals who oppose or are anxious about technological change.

Legitimate fears and concerns should be recognized and validated rather than dismissed.

Clear, empathetic communication that offers support and information can help reduce anxiety.

Involving resistant individuals in change processes increases their sense of control and ownership.

Demonstrating empathy towards the challenges of adaptation and acknowledging the disruption to established comfort zones fosters trust and more cooperative attitudes .

Overall, resistance to new technologies is a recurring historical phenomenon.

The phrase "plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose"—the more things change, the more they stay the same—aptly captures this pattern.

Technological progress continually prompts cycles of hope and apprehension, innovation and resistance, as societies negotiate what adaptation means for work, identity, and social equity .

In summary, the Luddites of the 21st century can be understood as individuals or groups who resist technological change due to complex and legitimate concerns, including fear of job loss, loss of control and agency, privacy and ethical worries, exclusion from decision processes, and perceptions of unfair impact distribution.

Addressing this resistance requires thoughtful, inclusive, and empathetic approaches that recognize these underlying causes rather than framing opposition simply as irrational fear or backwardness.

Title:

Content: -- -- -- / -- -- --
Site Management
Four Reasons to Stop Reading
Marzouq Al-Omari
• 60
• 0
A new task is assigned to the writer after his task was to write and produce knowledge and then education on the widest scale; writing makes his audience both near and far, and becomes the writer since he is a source of knowledge to come to him, so it is common in the Islamic literature that science comes to him and does not come, and it follows that depriving those who were not worthy of science from science. Except for his family. ”
The matter has turned and the writer is the one who is looking for the reader, who is responsible for the manufacture of his readers, and this is confirmed by the writing movement, and the exhibitions of selling the book, which know a great recession, and all bear the consequences of the writer, how is the manufacture of the reader?
I believe that the answer to this question calls for tracking the phenomenon – the phenomenon of reluctance to read – which is growing day after day until it has become the focus of attention of the media, the university and the social space, which specialists confirm the exacerbation of this phenomenon, and this tracking can be put on the factors that caused the emergence of this phenomenon, which can be limited to the following factors:
1. Learning:
Learning is the claim of knowledge not possession and acquisition, and pretending the appearance of its people not belonging to them in fact, and easy to obtain without effort and away from the writer and the book.
The learned individual imagines that he can acquire knowledge and discuss its issues without reading, especially with the widespread media, and this has generated self-esteem and the claim that reading the book is no longer necessary for knowledge acquisition.
This arrogant perception has given rise to negative legal, historical and general social phenomena such as a reluctance to learn, a phenomenon that has become even more prevalent in university circles.
Like criticizing the educated and ridiculing them and underestimating them, we often find the illiterate group that seized wealth and positions, and began criticizing the educated and intellectuals as they did not succeed socially so they did not form wealth and no one listened to them if they spoke, and this group became hesitant in all councils: What did the educated do?
It is also apparent to argue unknowingly; illiteracy only inherits an anti-knowledge reaction, and therefore the learned are constantly seeking to argue with the learned.
As for the causes of this negative phenomenon are many, including:
Ignorance of the truth of science: whether from the legal point of view or from the historical and factual point of view; from the legal point of view we find the first Qur ’ anic command: “Read in the name of your Lord. ” The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said:“ Whoever wants this world should know, and whoever wants the Hereafter should do it with knowledge. ”
One of the reasons is to underestimate the learner, he is no longer the celebrated individual, and therefore no longer the desired role model.
Another reason is the predominance of the highly educated in political and economic life in particular, and this has deprived the educated of access to the decision-making positions that they are supposed to be running so that life is public and the life of a Muslim is a life of science.
It has resulted on the learning as a negative behavior leave reading and then leave the first means to seek knowledge, followed by other phenomena such as manipulation of rights, no longer publishing houses reserve the rights of the author under the pretext of the decline of readability, but in many cases it became a condition for the writer to pay for it, and so the writing became a work to be fined for its owner as a punishment rather than a work should be valued as originally!
2) Indifference:
Indifference is indifference to the acquisition or non-acquisition of knowledge, and lack of awareness of its importance and necessity in the life of the Muslim man, and it is a negative behavior and from a moral perspective is a vice of vices, and reflected in the virtue of the grandfather as a high moral character.
The apathy is manifested in the non-invocation of reading as a priority in our lives, the prevalence of a behavior that belittles everything, even science, and therefore reading is no longer a thing of interest in the daily lives of many.
The reasons are many, including the phenomenon of despair that swept the lives of young people, which led to rule in the ambiguity of the future, and the fight against the intellectual and veneration of others, which devoted a rejected image to the reader, and made him judge the act of reading as a distraction and waste of time, and resulted in imbalance, and the spread of illiteracy, and the emergence of even what became known as “illiterate learners ”.
Digitization:
Digitization is a fertile space and facilitated many difficulties, and it is the most important manifestation of the communication revolution, which is a turning point in the history of social, political and historical events; what preceded it is not as after, because of the rapprochement of global culture and the transgression of cultural and civilizational peculiarities and its impact on the level of public awareness.
In addition to the promotional and advertising efficiency of the various sites, digitization was able to charm and absorb the new generation, not only in the field of news but also in the field of knowledge, and resulted in a total forgetting of the book and also resulted in another behavior is to move away from reading, and leave reading.
Through questioning some of those interested in this matter I found that they spend long hours and indulge completely in this work, but not to read a book or in search of the pleasure of reading in a new image away from the paper book and so on, but a desire to kill time, or follow simple comments that do not benefit cognitively, and there is no doubt that these are all negative goals, and they inherited the results of the justifying trend They justify this by the dominance of informatics, and that they discover the need for it, and it also facilitates access to information, and that is the secret to stay away from the book, but without awareness to stay away in its paper and electronic images even.
Absence of political support:
Political framing in any field is an important process as politics is the support that supports or rejects this or that work, and so human history records the position of politics in the success or failure of intellectual projects or renaissance and refute them if they are contrary to politics, and thus win doctrines and ideologies if they have a certain political background.
In our Islamic history, we read about the encouragement of some caliphs to writers that whoever wrote a book has its weight in gold.
Resulting on learning as a negative behavior left reading and then left the first means of seeking knowledge, and followed by other phenomena such as manipulation of rights, no longer publishing houses reserve the rights of the author under the pretext of declining readability, but in many cases it became a condition for the writer to pay for it, and so the writing became a work to be fined for its owner as a punishment rather than a work should be valued as originally!
This encouragement, which shows strong political support, has been a huge legacy that has served the whole of humanity in a vast way.
Therefore, one of the most important needs of reading as a cultural act is political support; while we find encouragement to sing in the name of “service to art ”, and to football in the name of“ service to sport ”, we find a complete absence of encouragement to read and write, and therefore we did not succeed in making the reader.
The follower of this matter finds himself following the decisions issued by the various political bodies responsible for this matter, and then can monitor the manifestations of the absence of political sponsorship to do reading as an act of civilization, including lack of support; I mean specifically here not to support the book; the writer spends years in writing one book to find himself working for free, he has no rights with any party not from the publishing house that dealt with, nor from the Ministry of Culture It is supposed to be the political body authorized to publish, distribute and sponsor the rights of the writer, and not any party.
While it is the opposite when it comes to other areas that have become competing with knowledge, such as sports and art, what is spent on singing and sports, especially football, is inconceivable, while what is spent on the book is nothing, and therefore the political basis for doing reading is completely absent.
This absence in my estimation is caused by the lack of awareness of the politicians themselves, the pressure of other aspects such as the social and economic aspect make them care at the expense of science and learning, including the lack of appreciation of the writer and writers and thus the retreat of the act of reading. The cognitive space that produces us humans, and this resulted in the neglect of the book, which in turn perpetuated the phenomenon of reluctance to read.
The reasons that prevented the new generation from taking the book and then reading as a duty of various dimensions, we can say that the reader industry is entrusted to overcome these obstacles, instead of being humble in seeking knowledge and sensing the need for it, and instead of indifference must be serious as a positive behavior that inherits discipline in all areas of life, including the field of scientific knowledge, and instead of passive exploitation and entertainment. Menna is exploited in its positive direction, and instead of the absence of political support must provide the political support for the writer and the book and thus the process of making the reader, and remains the best sitting in the sleep book.
Add your comment
All fields are required, and your email will not be published.
Please adhere to the site policy in the comments.
Your comment has been sent for review, it will be published after approval!
COMMENTS
0.
Excuse me! Excuse me!
There is no content to show!

Such understanding is essential for fostering a friendly and productive workplace atmosphere amid ongoing technological transformation.


The Mozart Effect is the notion that listening to Mozart’s music, particularly his Sonata for Two Pianos in D Major, temporarily enhances cognitive abilities, especially spatial reasoning.

Although widely popular, recent research presents a more complex and individualized picture of this effect.

A 2023 study found that classical music, including Mozart’s, does not universally improve memory or cognitive performance in people, including those with mild cognitive impairment.

Notably, individuals who habitually use music for mood regulation may benefit cognitively when listening, pointing to interindividual differences rather than a uniform effect .

Other studies note that classical instrumental music, particularly smoother piano pieces by Mozart, can enhance focus and productivity by inducing a positive emotional state receptive to learning.

In contrast, music with lyrics or complex dramatic passages can distract, making Mozart’s Sonata well-suited for educational settings .

Beyond cognition, classical music is associated with mood improvement and stress reduction, which indirectly support brain function.

Music therapy research shows benefits in mood, behavior, and cognition for elderly dementia patients when exposed to classical compositions, reflecting neurochemical changes that decrease stress hormones and enhance pleasure .

Nonetheless, scientific evidence for sustained or general cognitive gains through the Mozart Effect remains inconsistent, with improvements often linked to familiarity and emotional connection rather than the music itself .

Experts stress that the Mozart Effect depends heavily on individual preference and situation; any enjoyable music, amateur or classical, may yield similar benefits due to its subjective impact on cognition .

For classroom practice, playing Mozart’s instrumental music during breaks can promote a calm, focused atmosphere for some students but is not guaranteed to enhance cognitive performance for all.

The Mozart Effect is the notion that listening to Mozart’s music, particularly his Sonata for Two Pianos in D Major, temporarily enhances cognitive abilities, especially spatial reasoning.

Title:

Content: Search

Press "Enter" to search and "ESC" to close.
Inicio » English » Inspiration » The Sound of Success: Ideas in Music for Concentration and Productivity

The Sound of Success: Ideas in Music for Concentration and Productivity

Suscríbete a Nuestro Boletín
Recibe por email las noticias más destacadas

Does music help you concentrate? Since we spend a lot of time in front of computers trying to finish our work, wouldn’t it be nice to listen to some of music to help concentrate? Well, music lovers, it seems like Mozart and Beethoven could actually help you with your productivity. Beethoven once said: «Music is where the spirit lives, thinks and invents.»

This relationship between music and the brain is an area that has been intensively explored in research. Many studies point to the ability of music to help employees be more productive and help children in their learning process more effectively. University research in France found that students who listened to music for an hour while reading, scored significantly higher on a questionnaire compared to a group of students who read without music.

Your attention span is better when listening to music

It seems that music for concentration puts students in a heightened emotional state, so that they can be more receptive to information. «It is possible that music causes a change in the learning environment and influenced students’ motivation to stay focused while reading, which led to better performance on a multiple-choice questionnaire,» concluded the french research team in a recent article.

But before you start playing any type, you have to find the music that works better for the type of work you are trying to carry do. For example, the classic from the Baroque period is said to do wonders for brain activity when you are studying or writing. But not all classical music is created equal, so dramatic changes and complicated fugue changes may not be as conducive as a smooth piano piece. So if you have to choose a composer, we would say Mozart. There seems to be evidence that Mozart’s improves mental performance: it is called «The Mozart Effect”.

Build a harmonious space

If you don’t like classical, the discreet sound found in ambient music may work well for you instead. What is the purpose of this if you are not at the airport, you ask? Well, for creative purposes, it’s better than emptiness and silence. According to one of its pioneers, musician Brian Eno: “Background music must be able to accommodate many levels of attention when listening, without forcing one in particular. It must be as ignorable as it is interesting ”.

In fact, researchers have shown that a moderate level of noise, such as that found in the environment, can actually get creative juices flowing. Music with especially low-lows or especially high-highs should be avoided. Certain types of jazz instrumental melodies can also get your brain working.

Music without lyrics

In general, if you are doing work that requires writing, you should avoid listening to music with lyrics as the words in a song are especially destructive to your concentration. Since hearing words activates the brain’s language center, attempting to perform tasks related to another language would be like trying to have a conversation while someone else is speaking to you. But, if you are a cartoonist, and you don’t deal with sentence construction, hearing letters may not have the same effect.

Finally, studies show that listening to music you’re already familiar with may be better if you really need to focus. New songs take you into the unknown and your brain will want to listen closely to see what comes next. With the music you are familiar with you know what to expect, so it doesn’t distract you from your work. And if you like the tune you’re listening to try not to whistle it while you work, as that will only distract you.

The post The Sound of Success: Ideas in Music for Concentration and Productivity appeared first on Mundo Hispanico

Etiquetas: ,
Related post
Regresar al Inicio

Although widely popular, recent research presents a more complex and individualized picture of this effect.

Title:

Content: 4/25/23 · Research

The beneficial effects of music on memory may depend on how it is listened to

The initial results of the study of the 'Mozart effect' on neurodegeneration show that listening to classical music in the background has no benefits for learning
The research has been carried out with people experiencing mild cognitive impairment, and it did find individual differences when listening to 'high-arousal' music

Listening to 'high-arousal' music could have a positive effect on memory for people who are accustomed to using music as an emotional regulator (Image: Clem Onojeghuo, Unsplash)

Given the lack of effective treatments to counteract cognitive impairment, background music has traditionally been proposed as a possible therapeutic alternative for improving memory-related tasks. Its effect has long been the focus of debate, but this relationship has now been found to be possibly determined by new interindividual parameters, which means that it may be more complex than was previously thought. This is shown by research led by Marco Calabria, a researcher in the Cognitive Neurolab group of the Faculty of Health Sciences at the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), who is now considering new experiments.

The initial results of the Mozart effect and memory in patients with cognitive impairment (MEM-COG) study, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, suggest that listening to background classical music while performing memory tasks neither improves nor impairs learning levels among people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, listening to more 'high-arousal' music was found to have a possible positive effect on people who are accustomed to using music as an emotional regulator in their everyday lives, which suggests there is potential for further hypotheses and research.

The study, which has been published as open access in the Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, was carried out with patients at the neuropsychology unit of Barcelona's Hospital de Sant Pau, and involved researchers at the hospital, Montreal's Concordia University and Madrid's Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute.

There is no universal effect

"We found no general impact concerning the effect of music in terms of whether it had positive or negative effects on learning in cases of MCI, but we did find that it would be modulated for each individual. If people regularly use music as an emotional regulator in their daily life, such as to help them remain calm or for company, they will find it easier to obtain further benefits from music when they have to learn something new," explained Calabria, who has a PhD in Psychobiology.

The subjects of the study were people with mild amnestic cognitive impairment, i.e. they have memory problems as a result of an onset of neurodegeneration that is more specific in the parts of the brain dealing with aspects of learning and memory. The experiments consisted of observing 24 photographs of human faces. Participants were instructed to memorize them, and 10 minutes later, they were asked to look at a new series containing the previous 24 images and 24 new ones, in order to attempt to identify the ones that they had already seen.

A classical choice

The first test was performed with the subjects listening to classical music in the information consolidation phase but not in the recovery phase, while in the second exercise it was repeated with the auditory stimulus during both phases. However, no significant differences were observed in terms of results.

Classical music was used in these exercises because "it's a type of music that falls between relaxing and arousing, and has proven to be the most effective for enhancing memory". Furthermore, the fact that it is instrumental reduces the interference (that can come from lyrics) with the content that the participants have to learn in the memory task.

A ray of light

However, Calabria's team wanted to carry out a third experiment using popular music which was considered arousing rather than relaxing, and after a preliminary study, they used an instrumental version of Un rayo de sol (A ray of light), by the group Los Diablos. In that experiment, according to Calabria, the results suggested that "the use of music as a strategy for mood regulation is associated with better performance in memory tasks."

Ongoing research

This finding opens up the possibility of further research to continue exploring the role of interindividual preferences and attitudes towards music among patients with MCI. The group plans to continue the project until late 2024.

During this time, it will investigate whether background music could be more useful in other cognitive domains, such as in attention and concentration in patients with Parkinson's disease. The experiments will also involve the use of a new infrared spectroscopy device in the Neuro Lab, one of the recently opened new laboratories at the UOC, which will show the activation at the cerebral level while cognitive processes are taking place. This will help to determine whether or not there are any alterations in the brain's modulation, in which areas this takes place, and whether it depends on the type of person studied, regardless of the level of response to music.

In overall terms, this will help to find a type of marker which determines the people most likely to benefit from music in cognitive tasks. "The more we know about how background music shapes cognitive processes, the better the use we can make of music as a therapeutic tool in cognitive stimulation," concluded Calabria, an expert in the study of cognitive processes and a member of teaching staff on the UOC's Master's Degree in Neuropsychology.

This research project receives funding from the Ministry of Science and Innovation of the Government of Spain, and contributes to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) number 3, Good health and well-being.

Reference article:

Calabria, Marco et al. 'Background Music and Memory in Mild Cognitive Impairment: The Role of Interindividual Differences'. 1 Jan. 2023: 815 – 829. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-221051

Press contact

Sònia Armengou Casanovas
sarmengouc@uoc.edu
+34 619 413 823

UOC R&I

The UOC's research and innovation (R&I) is helping overcome pressing challenges faced by global societies in the 21st century by studying interactions between technology and human & social sciences with a specific focus on the network society, e-learning and e-health.

Over 500 researchers and more than 50 research groups work in the UOC's seven faculties, its eLearning Research programme and its two research centres: the Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3) and the eHealth Center (eHC).

The university also develops online learning innovations at its eLearning Innovation Center (eLinC), as well as UOC community entrepreneurship and knowledge transfer via the Hubbik platform.

Open knowledge and the goals of the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development serve as strategic pillars for the UOC's teaching, research and innovation. More information: research.uoc.edu.

Experts UOC

Press contact

You may also be interested in…

Most popular

See more on Research

A 2023 study found that classical music, including Mozart’s, does not universally improve memory or cognitive performance in people, including those with mild cognitive impairment.

Notably, individuals who habitually use music for mood regulation may benefit cognitively when listening, pointing to interindividual differences rather than a uniform effect .

Other studies note that classical instrumental music, particularly smoother piano pieces by Mozart, can enhance focus and productivity by inducing a positive emotional state receptive to learning.

Title:

Content: My channel
* Drag categories can be customized sorting
Recover Default OK
Setup
Alert
San Jose, California, resident's package was stolen. The thief was a wild boar.
Ex-girlfriend accuses "illegitimate daughter maintenance" of Hunter Biden settlement
The doctor ’ s words / When the mentally retarded person meets the familiar sound
In 2023, an estimated 6.7 million Americans aged 65 and older have Alzheimer ’ s disease.
Dementia in the elderly is an incurable disease. It is easy for patients to become isolated, because they will feel isolated and helpless about their own uselessness, and they are used to being alone in order to avoid embarrassment.
In the latter stages, they often lose the ability to communicate with people around them.
It is very painful for the patients themselves and the caregivers and family members who care for them.
In recent years, it has been found that music therapy can intervene and make up for this lack of progress.
It also increases the patient ’ s engagement with the surrounding environment and reduces many neurological symptoms, such as anxiety, depression, and unexplained tantrums.
In other words, when people with dementia are unable to connect with their loved ones, that is, when they are unable to speak their language, music is the last bridge to interact with each other.
Q1: Do people with dementia have special feelings about music?
A1: According to nearly a decade of research by the Department of Neurology at Northwestern University, it has been found that even though people with dementia lose language and other memories, memories related to music often remain in the brain.
This is because areas of the brain involved in musical memory (e.g., the cerebellum) are not affected until late in the disease process.
Familiar music can help people with dementia recover certain aspects of their memory, make them feel calm, and greatly improve their mood.
Q2: Why do people with dementia remember their favorite songs?
A2: Although suffering from severe dementia, it means that a person has very little memory of their past.
Even if you can ’ t remember your son ’ s name, familiar songs that you ’ ve heard and sung will always come to mind.
Q3: In addition to music, is listening to the radio good for elderly people with dementia?
A3: In fact, the radio can not only provide good music, but also play emotional dialogue, which can truly relieve the loneliness of the dementia patient and bring comfort and peace.
Q4: How do people with dementia react to music?
A4: According to the research of clinical psychiatrists, it is found that people with dementia who are generally slow to respond to music, especially to their favorite music.
Hearing a familiar concert naturally shows a pleasant response, such as smiling or moving your body or even starting to dance.
And it seems to produce a unique and powerful stimulus response to familiar music that awakens the patient ’ s past personal and social connections.
In theory, if music can evoke memories, it may also help patients evoke other memories or related memories of that period.
In several studies, it has been consistently found that music tends to evoke more positive and positive memories from life than other clues.
Q5: Can music also prevent cognitive decline?
A5: Playing and listening to music can help slow the decline of cognitive function in older adults, according to a new study in Medical Journal Today.
Active note vibrations increase gray matter in certain areas of the brain and increase the plasticity of brain cells. Although music does not reverse or prevent brain cell shrinkage due to aging, it can slow cognitive decline.
Q6: What kind of music is most helpful?
A6: Studies have proved that classical music is the best choice.
The International Institute of Science calls this phenomenon the "Mozart effect."
It is recommended to listen to classical music such as Mozart, Bach, Beethoven and other famous composers.
Classical music seems to move the brain more easily than other music, is best suited for concentration, and is more able to produce substantial effects in absorbing new information.
Q7: Do musicians suffer from dementia?
A7: According to the International Institute of Science, a study of twins reported that musicians have a 64% lower risk of developing mild cognitive impairment or dementia.
The analysis of two other studies found that musicians had an average 59% lower risk of dementia.
Training and performance, which can be attributed to music, stimulates the brain and improves its ability to respond to the outside world.
Q8: Which organ is most stimulated by music?
A8: Although most activities such as visual art, computing, and language are mainly only half of the brain.
But music is one of the few that can pass through the auditory nerve and stimulate neurons on both sides of the brain at the same time.
Q9: How does music react in the brain?
A9: Music can promote the production of hormones dopamine and serotonin in the brain.
These are neurotransmitters that increase the sense of pleasure and ease.
There is also the so-called love hormone - oxytocin.
At the same time, research evidence shows that music can help reduce levels of the stress hormone cortisol, instantly relieving feelings of anxiety and depression.
Q10: How long does the music last?
A10: It ’ s a concern that in people with dementia, music can improve mood, behavior, and in some cases cognitive function, which, according to the Clinical Psychiatric Society, lasts for hours or even days after the music stops.
Q11: Can people without dementia benefit from music?
A11: A recent study suggests that playing an instrument and actively listening to music can help slow cognitive decline in people aged 62-78.
This study once again determined that musical activity increases the gray matter in many areas of the brain. Gray matter is an essential nerve tissue in the brain and spinal cord.
In particular, it plays an important role in psychology, memory, mood and movement. The increase in gray matter also increases the plasticity of the brain ’ s nerves – the brain ’ s ability to reconnect itself, which is important for learning cognition and memory preservation.
In addition to actively playing music, the 2023 study also showed that long-term music training, regardless of the age of the participants, can bring potential functional benefits to the brain and help keep the brain young and slow down aging.
(The author is a practicing physician in the Greater Washington area)
Classical Music Medicine
The last one.
Anal muscle fasciitis with abdominal pain under heavy training
The next one.
Write It / Reveal Hidden Trauma Self Healing
Extended reading
Super-popular
More >

In contrast, music with lyrics or complex dramatic passages can distract, making Mozart’s Sonata well-suited for educational settings .

Beyond cognition, classical music is associated with mood improvement and stress reduction, which indirectly support brain function.

Music therapy research shows benefits in mood, behavior, and cognition for elderly dementia patients when exposed to classical compositions, reflecting neurochemical changes that decrease stress hormones and enhance pleasure .

Nonetheless, scientific evidence for sustained or general cognitive gains through the Mozart Effect remains inconsistent, with improvements often linked to familiarity and emotional connection rather than the music itself .

Experts stress that the Mozart Effect depends heavily on individual preference and situation; any enjoyable music, amateur or classical, may yield similar benefits due to its subjective impact on cognition .

For classroom practice, playing Mozart’s instrumental music during breaks can promote a calm, focused atmosphere for some students but is not guaranteed to enhance cognitive performance for all.