The use of additives in salmon farming is a common practice to enhance the growth and health of the fish, with additives such as vitamins, minerals, and amino acids being commonly used.

Some of the common additives used in salmon farming include soy proteins, wheat gluten, corn gluten meal, vitamins, fishmeal, and fish oil.

Fishmeal is a key ingredient in salmon farming feed, while fish oil is essential in aquaculture feeds to provide necessary fatty acids.

Vitamins are added nutrients in compound feed, which can help reduce the use of fishmeal and fish oil.

The use of additives in salmon farming can have health concerns associated with it, such as the accumulation of pollutants in fish with high fat content.

Farmed salmon can contain more Omega 3 than wild salmon due to the use of fish oil in their feed, but vegetable oils are also used as a cheaper and more sustainable alternative.

The use of additives in salmon farming is governed by various standards and regulations, which can vary by country, but the goal is to ensure the health and safety of both the fish and the consumers.

In Norway, the use of additives in salmon farming is regulated by the Aquaculture Act, which includes standards for additives used in feed.

The Aquaculture Stewardship Council has a standard for salmon farming, which includes guidelines for additive use.

The RSPCA has welfare standards for farmed Atlantic salmon, which may include guidelines for additive use.

In China, the use of additives in salmon farming is regulated by the Food Safety Law, which standardizes food additive use and storage.

The General Administration of Market Supervision regulates food additive use, including in salmon farming, and ensures that food additives are stored separately from food products.

The use of additives in salmon farming can have environmental impacts, such as pollution and waste, and reducing their use can have economic benefits, such as reducing the cost of feed.

Compound feed can cut down on fish use and is cheaper, making it a more economical option for salmon farmers.

China reduced feed-grade fish use by 77 percent in some aquaculture trials, which can help reduce the environmental impact of salmon farming.

Replacing feed-grade fish with compound feed can reduce pollution and protect vulnerable ocean ecosystems.

The economic value of salmon aquaculture can be affected by the use of additives, and reducing their use can help maintain a healthy and sustainable industry.

Land-based salmon farming can reduce marine pollution and is a more sustainable option for the industry.

Atlantic Sapphire built a large land salmon farm in Florida, which can help reduce the environmental impact of salmon farming.

Microbubble oxygenation reduces marine pollution and increases growth rate, making it a viable option for salmon farmers.

Microbubble technology reduces pollution and increases seafood production, which can help minimize the need for additives.

Domestic feed production can help reduce the use of additives, and domestic feed contains 40% raw protein and essential amino acids.

Domestic feed can be used in industrial and private water farms, making it a more sustainable option for the industry.

Overall, the use of additives in salmon farming is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits, as well as the development of effective regulatory frameworks to ensure consumer safety and promote sustainable aquaculture practices.

The detection of additives in salmon feed and tissue is a crucial aspect of ensuring the safety and quality of farmed salmon, and modern methods such as DNA macrobarcode technology and real-time fluorescent PCR are being used for this purpose.

The use of probiotics, such as Lactic Acid Bacillus B4, in salmon farming has been shown to improve fish growth and immunity.

Probiotics like Lactic Acid Bacillus B4 also produce glucan, which increases probiotics and regulates immunity in fish when sucrose is added.

The addition of yogurt feed containing Lactic Acid Bacillus B4 to the diet of fish for 2 months has been found to reduce disease and increase fish weight.

Farmed salmon may contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and artificial toxins, which are harmful to human health.

Farmed salmon has higher PCB levels than wild salmon, with PCB levels being 8 times higher in farmed salmon.

Eating farmed salmon may increase cancer risk due to the high levels of PCBs present in the fish.

High PCB concentrations in farmed salmon can double the risk of prostate cancer in men.

The consumption of farmed salmon with high levels of additives can have negative health effects on the immune and nervous systems.

The excess fat in farmed salmon can accumulate pollutants, making it a less healthy option for human consumption.

Farmed salmon can contain more Omega 3 than wild salmon, but the use of vegetable oils in feed can reduce the Omega 3 content.

The variable feed used in salmon farming can affect the nutritional content of farmed salmon, making it essential to regulate and monitor feed quality.

Reducing additives in salmon farming can mitigate environmental degradation.

IMTA systems reduce excess food and feces in water, which can help minimize the need for additives.

Mussels remove up to 54% of salmon waste materials, and oarweed removes soluble nutrients from the water column, reducing the need for additives.

Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture is a sustainable method that can reduce the need for antibiotics and additives.

The use of additives in salmon farming can harm the environment, and reducing their use can have economic benefits, such as reducing the cost of feed.

The economic value of salmon aquaculture can be affected by the use of additives, and reducing their use can help maintain a healthy and sustainable industry.

Tasmania's fisheries and aquaculture contributed $800 million to the economy in 2020-21, and reducing additive use can help maintain this economic value.

Strategies to minimize additive use include implementing IMTA systems, using microbubble oxygenation, and producing domestic feed.

These strategies can help maintain fish health and growth rates while reducing the environmental impact of salmon farming.

The use of additives in salmon farming is regulated by standards and regulations in countries such as Norway, Scotland, and China.

The Fish Feed and Additives market has key players like Aller Aqua AS and Biomar AS, which can help drive the development of more sustainable feed options.

The market size and growth rate of the Fish Feed and Additives market are analyzed over the forecast period, which can help identify trends and opportunities for reducing additive use.

Overall, the use of additives in salmon farming is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits, as well as the development of effective regulatory frameworks to ensure consumer safety and promote sustainable aquaculture practices.

The use of additives in salmon farming is a common practice to enhance the growth and health of the fish, with additives such as vitamins, minerals, and amino acids being commonly used.

Title:

Content: Uncategorized

Global and United States Organic Feed Additive Market Report & Forecast 2022-2028

Organic Feed Additive market is segmented by region (country), players, by Type and by Application. Players, stakeholders, and other participants in the global Organic Feed Additive market will be able to gain the upper hand as they use the report as a powerful resource. The segmental analysis focuses on revenue and forecast by region (country), by Type and by Application for the period 2017-2028.

For United States market, this report focuses on the Organic Feed Additive market size by players, by Type and by Application, for the period 2017-2028. The key players include the global and local players, which play important roles in United States.

Segment by Type

Minerals

Amino Acids

Vitamins

Enzymes

Others

Segment by Application

Ruminants

Poultry

Swine

Aquatic Animals

Others

By Region

North America

U.S.

Canada

Europe

Germany

France

U.K.

Italy

Russia

Asia-Pacific

China

Japan

South Korea

India

Australia

China Taiwan

Indonesia

Thailand

Malaysia

Latin America

Mexico

Brazil

Argentina

Middle East & Africa

Turkey

Saudi Arabia

UAE

By Company

Evonik

Dow

DSM

Adisseo

BASF

ADM

Nutreco

Charoen Pokphand Group

Cargill

Sumitomo

Kemin Industries

Biomin

Alltech

Addcon

Bio Agri Mix

Table of content

1 Study Coverage
1.1 Organic Feed Additive Product Introduction
1.2 Global Organic Feed Additive Outlook 2017 VS 2022 VS 2028
1.2.1 Global Organic Feed Additive Sales in US$ Million for the Year 2017-2028
1.2.2 Global Organic Feed Additive Sales in Volume for the Year 2017-2028
1.3 United States Organic Feed Additive Outlook 2017 VS 2022 VS 2028
1.3.1 United States Organic Feed Additive Sales in US$ Million for the Year 2017-2028
1.3.2 United States Organic Feed Additive Sales in Volume for the Year 2017-2028
1.4 Organic Feed Additive Market Size, United States VS Global, 2017 VS 2022 VS 2028
1.4.1 The Market Share of United States Organic Feed Additive in Global, 2017 VS 2022 VS 2028
1.4.2 The Growth Rate of Organic Feed Additive Market Size, United States VS Global, 2017 VS 2022 VS 2028
1.5 Organic Feed Additive Market Dynamics
1.5.1 Organic Feed Additive Industry Trends
1.5.2 Organic Feed Additive Market Drivers
1.5.3 Organic Feed Additive Market Challenges
1.5.4 Organic Feed Additive Market Restraints
1.6 Study Objectives
1.7 Years Considered
2 Market by Type
2.1 Organic Feed Additive Market Segment by Type
2.1.1 Minerals
2.1.2 Amino Acids
2.1.3 Vitamins
2.1.4 Enzymes
2.1.5 Others
2.2 Global Organic Feed Additive Market Size by Type
2.2.1 Global Organic Feed Additive Sales in Value, by

CONTACT US:
276 5th Avenue, New York , NY 10001,United States
International: (+1) 646 781 7170 / +91 8087042414
Visit: https://www.grandresearchstore.com/
https://www.grandresearchstore.com/latest ArticlesRead Morelatest Articleslatest Publications

Related Articles

Back to top button

Some of the common additives used in salmon farming include soy proteins, wheat gluten, corn gluten meal, vitamins, fishmeal, and fish oil.

Title:

Content: 262
Views

China Works to Get Wild-Caught Fish Out of its Aquaculture Feed

[By Zhang Chun]

A 2021 Chinese government initiative to stop aquaculture feed being made from only young or low-value fish and to instead start producing “compound feed” – mixed with ingredients harvested from the land – is opening up a greener future for the sector.

According to the Ministry of Agriculture, in a series of trials last year, the sole use of low-value “feed-grade” fish as aquaculture feed was reduced by 77 percent, and by as much as 94 percent in farming of largemouth bass. Experts say the switch to compound feed could see overall use of feed-grade fish slashed by half for farming of certain species.

What is compound feed?

Compound feed normally contains a mixture of animal- and plant-based ingredients, and added nutrients such as vitamins. For aquaculture feeds containing fishmeal and fish oil, common additives include soy proteins, wheat gluten and corn gluten meal.

Feed-grade fish are those in a catch that are small, low in commercial value, or unsuitable for human consumption. They are sent to be processed into fishmeal and fish oil, or fed directly to farmed fish. But a significant proportion of feed-grade fish consists of juveniles of commercially important species. Once caught they can no longer grow into adult fish and breed, or be caught and sold on the market. Their removal damages ocean food chains and ecosystem stability.

The last decade and more has seen increased calls for China to tackle the use of feed-grade fish in aquaculture, but the current round of trials is the first organised by the Ministry of Agriculture. It focuses on species such as the yellow croaker, Japanese sea bass and largemouth bass, which tend to be fed more feed-grade fish. While those species don’t account for much of China’s fed aquaculture output, they do require much more protein than others to put on the same amount of weight. Compound feed cuts down on the use of fish by substituting vegetable alternatives, and is cheaper.

In the long term, sustained reductions in the use of fishmeal and fish oil in feed will be necessary to protect wild fisheries.

Aquaculture driving feed-grade fish catch

Fishers never used to set out to catch feed-grade fish; it was bycatch, with no economic value. Then in the 1980s, global aquaculture took off. “There was a lot of need for fishmeal and oil,” Rashid Sumalia, a fisheries researcher at the University of British Columbia, told China Dialogue. People started going out “purposely to catch them at distance, because there was a market”, he added.

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization’s (FAO’s) 2020 global fisheries and aquaculture report, the use of fish for reduction to fishmeal and fish oil peaked in 1994 at 30 million tonnes, and stood at 18 million tonnes by 2018. Another 4 million tonnes were used elsewhere, including directly in feed for aquaculture, livestock and fur animals.

It wasn’t until the mid and late 1990s that aquaculture took off in China. The FAO’s 1998 fisheries and aquaculture report describes how rare it was for fish catches in Asia to go unused or be used as aquaculture feed. But in Asia, particularly in China and Vietnam, aquaculture has expanded rapidly and the region now accounts for almost 90 percent of global output. In China, output tripled between 1998 and 2020, to represent 60 percent of the global total.

Although many of the species farmed in China need little or no feed, fed fish and crustacean aquaculture accounts for half of output and requires millions of tonnes of feed-grade fish from Chinese waters alone. China does not currently have statistics on its feed-grade fish catch or use in fed aquaculture. One study calculated that in 2016 4.6 million tonnes of feed-grade fish were caught, 35 percent of the total recorded catch in China’s waters, and most was used directly as feed.

“The state is certainly aware of the problem,” said Fang Qing, China general manager for the Aquaculture Stewardship Council, adding that the difficulty in banning some harmful types of fishing gear in China is due to the ongoing market for the feed-grade fish it brings in. Since 2018, China has put minimum size limits in place for 15 commercial fish species, and ruled that feed-grade fish catch would drop to below 20% by 2020. There is no data available indicating whether this target was met.

This it isn’t just a Chinese problem. According to a 2017 study by the University of British Columbia, many countries, including the US and Norway, use feed-grade fish directly as feed. But the practice increased significantly in Asia between the 1990s and 2010, with feed-grade fish coming to account for a high percentage of landed catches.

Replacing feed-grade fish

In early 2019, the Ministry of Agriculture announced it would work to make Chinese aquaculture more environmentally friendly, and proposed the use of compound feed instead of purely fish-based feed. In April 2021, several provinces started trials of compound feed as part of more concrete action plans.

Compound feed for aquaculture is usually a mix of fishmeal, fish oil, wheat flour, soybean meal, vegetable oil and other land-grown ingredients. The amount of fishmeal and fish oil needed depends on the type of fish to be fed, and its stage of growth. According to Fang Qing, carnivorous fish such as the yellow croaker need huge quantities of meat protein at certain stages in their growth, and the relationship between particular nutrients and the growth and physiology of the fish can be complex. Hence, producing appropriate compound feed involves a lot of research and development.

To quantify how efficiently a species is farmed, the aquaculture industry uses a ratio called Fish in:Fish out (FIFO). The closer the FIFO is to 1, the more fish meat is produced per unit of input; a score of 1 means an extra kilogram of fish used as feed results in an extra kilogram of fish to harvest.

A study published in 2020 shows a FIFO of almost 1 for salmon and trout, thanks to the use of compound feeds which require less fishmeal and fish oil. If only fish were used to feed those species, the FIFO figure would be similar to that of the yellow croaker – over 6, according to an upcoming paper co-authored by Zhang Wenbo, an assistant professor in the College of Fisheries and Life Science at Shanghai Ocean University. His research into conventional yellow croaker aquaculture in China found that the direct use of feed-grade fish is still the best option for the yellow croaker farmers. But Fang Qing told China Dialogue that a lot of feed-grade fish fed to yellow croaker goes uneaten, and ends up sinking to the seabed or rotting, causing pollution and increasing the risk of disease.

More compound feed use would help reduce FIFO numbers in two ways: by cutting use of feed-grade fish, and by increasing conversion ratios – that is, generating more fish growth per unit of feed.

Zhejiang is taking the lead in both those areas. Since 2016, the province has been shutting fishmeal factories during the closed season and restricting the percentage of feed-grade fish in the overall catch. This, combined with the use of compound feed, saw Zhejiang cut the use of feed-grade fish by 835,000 tonnes across 710,000 mu (474 square kilometres) of aquaculture farms during the 13th FYP period (2016-2020). “Previously, feed-grade fish were the primary feed for largemouth bass in Zhejiang. These last two years that’s almost all been replaced with compound feed.” The FIFO ratio for farmed largemouth bass in Zhejiang could come down to 1.5, half the national average for this species, according to 2016 calculations Zhang Wenbo contributed to.

But cutting back on feed-grade fish use in China won’t be easy. Fishers catch a wide range of fish with a wide range of gear. At the local level there is a lack of fisher associations that can impose rules on the sector, making management tricky. Zhejiang’s success can be ascribed to strong local regulations. “There are no successful [international] examples that China can apply,” said Fang Qing. Alongside legislation to bolster oversight of the feed-grade fish catch, he also suggests developing feeds which will be more palatable to fish, and labelling products according to their use of feed-grade fish or compound feed, so consumers can make an informed choice.

Increasing the efficiency of fish inputs

The use of compound feed isn’t the end of the story. At least for now, fishmeal and fish oil are essential ingredients in those feeds. And while the global supply of fishmeal and fish oil has fallen from its peak in 2000 to a fairly stable level, the demand for aquaculture feeds has been increasing. That requires the development of feeds containing less meal and oil.

Plans announced by Norway to boost salmon farming have led to concerns about the supply of fishmeal and fish oil as well as vegetable ingredients. The country has started researching the use of mesopelagic fish (which inhabit the middle depths of the ocean), algae and farmed insects to meet that need and make feed more efficient. A more complete solution would be to develop entirely vegetarian feeds, with no fishmeal at all. However, as things stand that would only be suitable for a few species.

“Fishmeal is the most expensive of the ingredients found in bulk feeds. Reducing the amount in those feeds is the best way to make them cheaper,” Zhang Wenbo points out. A tonne of fishmeal costs around 10,000 yuan (US$1,500), compared to 1,000–4,000 yuan for bran or soybean meal, he added. “Feed conversion ratios are also affected by the type of aquaculture, the make-up of the feed, and genetic selection – the breeding of strains more suited to compound feeds,” he said. This is more difficult in China, with its wide range of farmed species, than in Norway, where salmon dominates. But progress is still being made, and associated targets have been set in the 14th Five Year Plan (2021–25).

Increasing the efficiency of fishmeal and fish oil use in China will also ease global pressures on the supply and help protect juvenile fish. China is the world’s biggest consumer of fishmeal, with the largest part being used in aquaculture, and the second largest being fed to pigs. But the country only produces 400,000–700,000 tonnes of fishmeal a year – not even close to meeting domestic demand. Fishmeal imports have held steady since 2017, at about 1.4 million tonnes, but jumped to 1.82 million tonnes in 2021, with experts ascribing the change to the recovery in pig farming. The extra fishmeal came from the Americas and elsewhere in Asia.

Zhang Wenbo explains that China’s fishmeal and fish oil imports come from forage fish, caught specifically to be turned into fishmeal, and Peru is the main supplier. Relatively little of China’s fishmeal is made from feed-grade fish. “Imports of by-product processed fishmeal from Vietnam and Thailand have been increasing in recent years,” he said.

Minimizing the feed-grade fish catch

Cutting back on the use of feed-grade fish is good for the sustainable development of both wild fishing and aquaculture. It will also help protect already vulnerable ocean ecosystems. In 1959, fishing vessels in China’s Bohai Sea caught 420 kg of fish per net for every hour they worked. By 1993, that had fallen to 30 kg, and only 8 kg between 1998 and 2011. The above-mentioned research into China’s feed-grade fish catch found that a long-term stable total catch has masked trends including falling biomass and changes in end use.

The losses to biodiversity and ecological services cannot be measured in financial terms, and the fishing industry needs more than simply output. Wang Songlin, president and founder of the Qingdao Marine Conservation Society, believes the industry needs to work towards a balance of ecological, economic and social benefits. He told China Dialogue that even if total catch may still be the same by volume, the underlying destruction to the integrity of ecosystems and the environment should not be ignored.

Management of the sector in China has acquired a new ecological focus. Alongside the use of compound feeds, some provinces are providing fishery stewardship subsidies for the protection of rare and endangered species and for keeping down feed-grade fish catch volumes.

Protecting juvenile fish isn’t just a matter for China – it’s crucial for ocean ecosystems around the world. Rashid Sumalia said: “If you look at the economies and the ecology at the higher level, you don’t want to [catch feed-grade fish] because the losses are too high” to be sustainable. Sumalia acknowledges that many people rely on that fishing for their livelihoods but says: “We need to take it down as far as we can.”

Zhang Chun is a senior researcher at China Dialogue. This article appears courtesy of China Dialogue Ocean and may be found in its original form here

The opinions expressed herein are the author's and not necessarily those of The Maritime Executive.

Fishmeal is a key ingredient in salmon farming feed, while fish oil is essential in aquaculture feeds to provide necessary fatty acids.

Vitamins are added nutrients in compound feed, which can help reduce the use of fishmeal and fish oil.

The use of additives in salmon farming can have health concerns associated with it, such as the accumulation of pollutants in fish with high fat content.

Title:

Content: Salmon Meat Fresh Orange Red VS Dark Red From Flavor Color Fat Determine Salmon Cultured or Wild
Food Safety 13: 09 2023 / 11 / 11
Share:
Share:
There are three major differences between wild salmon and farmed salmon.
The average consumer relies on the label on the packaging to confirm whether the salmon is farmed or wild, and the food label is different from country to country.
Stan liked the Japanese way of labelling the fish. Whether it was farmed or wild was clearly written; however, if there were no such labelling elsewhere, how would you know where it came from?
In order to make the meat more beautiful, the fish will be added to the feed to make the meat appear bright orange red, attracting consumers to buy, that is, everyone sees the color of salmon meat on weekdays, because the wild salmon does not have that kind of pigment, the fish will appear dark red, it does not look so beautiful.
If you look carefully, the fish meat of the salmon will have a very obvious white fat line, because the feed is specially added a lot of fat to speed up the weight of the fish, but in fact, the wild salmon in the food eaten in the wild environment, there is not so much fat, so the fat line of the wild salmon is smaller than that of the fish.
In addition, because many pollutants are fat-soluble, too much fat in fish makes pollutants accumulate; in terms of taste, wild salmon does not have as much fat as fish, so it is not so oily when cooking, but its fish meat is more delicious.
Of course, you may be very health-conscious and afraid that wild salmon is too expensive, but there are many other omega-3 rich ingredients to choose from.
Fish, you can eat mackerel, mackerel, tuna, sardines, etc. Plants, you can eat flaxseeds, chia seeds and peach, but note that the Omege-3 of the plant is not directly absorbed, you must undergo physical transformation to obtain, so absorption will be slower; as for supplements, you can choose fish oil or krill oil, these are very good and convenient to choose. And...
HKET App has been fully upgraded, TOPICK offers a range of family, health, entertainment, Hong Kong news and leisure life information and videos for everyone.
Download now.. https: / / onelink.to / f92q4m
Author: Pilot Stan

Farmed salmon can contain more Omega 3 than wild salmon due to the use of fish oil in their feed, but vegetable oils are also used as a cheaper and more sustainable alternative.

Title:

Content: Cheaper salmon is 'as good as premium farmed products when it comes to Omega 3', study shows

  • Fish-eaters benefit from two Omega 3 fatty acids – EPA and DHA – which can boost heart health and thinking skills
  • Researchers analysed packs of farmed Scottish and Norwegian salmon from 10 UK supermarkets
  • The best provided 67% of the recommended weekly Omega 3 but the worst only offered 26%
  • Fillets from two stores did not contain significantly more Omega 3 than non-premium products

Premium farmed salmon may be no healthier than value brands when it comes to Omega 3, a study has shown.

Fish-eaters benefit from two Omega 3 fatty acids – EPA and DHA – which can boost heart health and thinking skills.

Researchers analysed packs of farmed Scottish and Norwegian salmon from 10 UK supermarkets.

The best provided 67 per cent of the recommended weekly Omega 3 but the worst only offered 26 per cent.

Fillets from two stores did not contain significantly more Omega 3 than non-premium products.

Premium farmed salmon may be no healthier than value brands when it comes to Omega 3, a study has shown. Fish-eaters benefit from two Omega 3 fatty acids – EPA and DHA – which can boost heart health and thinking skills. (File image)

Farmed salmon tend to be fed a mixture of fish and vegetable oils but the latter lack the fatty acids found in seafood.

Study leader Dr Matthew Sprague, from Stirling University, said: 'The amount of EPA and DHA can vary based on the cut of salmon, as well as what it was fed, but farmed salmon is still high in nutrients.'

Salmon not only contains Omega 3 but selenium and phosphorus, which are also important for health.

Andrew Opie, director of food and sustainability at the British Retail Consortium, said: 'Consumers take various factors into consideration when buying salmon, including its health benefits and the way it is produced, and they will weigh these up when choosing what to purchase in a supermarket.'

Salmon not only contains Omega 3 but selenium and phosphorus, which are also important for health

Phil Brooke, from Compassion in World Farming, said: 'Intensive fish farming is bad for fish welfare and the product only contains Omega 3 due to the wasteful consumption of feed containing fish oil.'

Wild salmon consume only fish oil, which they get from algae and smaller fish, but lose fatty acids from that fish oil, as they become leaner during the migration back from the sea to the river to spawn.

This means farmed fish, which are kept confined in cages within the sea, can contain more Omega 3 than the wild variety.

But vegetable oil is more accessible, sustainable, and also cheaper than fish oil for the expanding fish farming industry.

So more of this can be used, which substantially reduces the amount of Omega 3 in farmed salmon.

Advertisement

Cheaper salmon is 'as good as premium farmed products when it comes to Omega 3', study shows

No comments have so far been submitted. Why not be the first to send us your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The use of additives in salmon farming is governed by various standards and regulations, which can vary by country, but the goal is to ensure the health and safety of both the fish and the consumers.

Title:

Content:
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

trusted source

proofread

Anticipating obsolescence: The next step to enhancing the sustainability of aquaculture

With growing concerns about the environmental toll of single species fish farms, a research project has been looking at the feasibility of introducing a more sustainable and potentially more profitable method of fish farming, using three complementary species.

Much as native American people planted squash, maize and climbing beans together to benefit each other, (often called the "three sisters"), farming finned-fish, shellfish and seaweeds together could benefit each other and reduce any environmental effects of fish farming. Small scale integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA), as the system is called, has traditionally been used at a small domestic scale in Asia, providing the farmer with more than one product to sell or use.

The feasibility study conducted by Bangor University and published in Ecological Modelling has identified the locations around the Atlantic coast which would be most suitable for IMTA, based on farming salmon, and Oarweed, a type of kelp seaweed commonly found in temperate Atlantic coasts. The research considered the natural distribution of the three species, whether suitable locations clashed with busy shipping lanes or marine protected areas and whether there was close access to sizeable ports in order to reach markets.

The western coast of Lewis in the Outer Hebrides, Scotland; Lough Swilly in County Donegal, Ireland, and the western coast of Brittany, northwest France were found to be the best locations to further develop IMTA based aquaculture.

As Conchúr Hughes of Bangor University's School of Ocean Sciences explained, "One of the problems with the type of single species aquaculture practiced in Europe is that excess food and feces can lead to deterioration of local ecology, while density can mean that aquaculture companies need to use antibiotics and other additives to maintain a healthy fish-stock.

"Mussels are filter feeders, they can be responsible for removing up to 54% of salmon waste materials from the , using it as energy to grow, while the oarweed removes soluble nutrients from the water column. Oarweed can then be farmed to use in a variety of products, from food supplements for human consumption or for fish farms, as a fertilizer or as an ingredient in pharmaceuticals.

"Each of these species complements the other and mitigates against problems."

IMTA-based aquaculture

Both salmon and mussels are important food sources in Europe, and while oarweed is not as yet, this is a sector that is expected to experience a rapid increase in demand in the coming years- and can provide an alternative sustainable source of fertilizer and other products.

Seaweed cultivation can also provide environmental benefits. The seaweed in the water acts as a buffer against as it approaches the shore, reducing the energy as it passes through the seaweed, much as trees act as a buffer against strong winds, which can help reduce erosion. It also elevates the pH and oxygenates the water.

More information: Conchúr Hughes et al, Habitat suitability modelling for an integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) system along Europe's Atlantic coast, Ecological Modelling (2023). DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110459

Provided by Bangor University

Citation: Anticipating obsolescence: The next step to enhancing the sustainability of aquaculture (2023, September 27) retrieved 27 September 2023 from https://phys.org/news/2023-09-obsolescence-sustainability-aquaculture.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

How the humble sea cucumber could transform fish farming

0 shares

Feedback to editors

In Norway, the use of additives in salmon farming is regulated by the Aquaculture Act, which includes standards for additives used in feed.

Title:

Content: DUBLIN, March 9, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- The "Global Salmon Market, By Species, By Fish Type, By Distribution Channel, By Product Type, Estimation & Forecast, 2017 - 2027" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The global salmon market held a market value of USD 20,880.5 Million in 2021 and is projected to reach USD 27,344.0 Million by the year 2027. The market is anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 4.6% from 2022 to 2027. Approximately, 3,282.72 kilo tons of salmon was estimated to be sold in 2021.

Salmon is a common name for a Salmonidae family's species of the ray-finned fish. The market is expected to be driven by the rising prevalence of chronic conditions and global rise in penetration of e-commerce sector. Furthermore, rise in consumer awareness towards the health benefits of salmon are also expected to contribute to the market growth.

Despite the driving factors, depletion of sea species are anticipated to hinder the market growth. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the market was negatively impacted due to closure of fishing activities and hence, decrease in the supply of salmon in global markets.

Growth Influencers:

Rise in consumer awareness towards the health benefits of salmon

Salmon provides various health benefits. It is rich in Omega-3 fatty acids, is a great source of protein, high in Vitamin B, good source of potassium, loaded with selenium, contains astaxanthin, reduced the risk of heart diseases, helps in weight management, helps to fight inflammation, and protects brain health. Consumers are getting aware regarding all these benefits, which is increasing its adoption, hence boosting the market growth.

Competitive Landscape

Major players in the global salmon market include Cermaq Group ASA, Leroy Seafood Group ASA, Mowi ASA, SalMar ASA, AquaChile, Cooke Aquaculture, Bakkafrost, Grieg Seafood, Multiexport, Blumar, Salmones Camanchaca, Australis Seafoods, Nova Sea, Tassal Group, Sinkaberg-Hansen, Nordlaks, Bremnes Seashore, Norway Royal Salmon, Alsaker Fjordbruk, and Other Prominent Players.

These market players are involved in collaborations, mergers & acquisitions, and new product launches, among other initiatives, to strengthen their market presence. For instance, in January 2022, Benchmark Animal Health and Cermaq received funding from the Research Council of Norway for research and development of Tenacibaculum vaccines for Salmon. Furthermore, Bekkafrost collaborated with the salmon industry through the Faroe Fish Farmer's Association And Global Salmon Initiative (GSI).

The global Salmon market report provides insights on the below pointers:

  • Market Penetration: Provides comprehensive information on the market offered by the prominent players
  • Market Development: The report offers detailed information about lucrative emerging markets and analyzes penetration across mature segments of the markets
  • Market Diversification: Provides in-depth information about untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments
  • Competitive Landscape Assessment: Mergers & acquisitions, certifications, product launches in the global Salmon market have been provided in this research report. In addition, the report also emphasizes the SWOT analysis of the leading players.
  • Product Development & Innovation: The report provides intelligent insights on future technologies, R&D activities, and breakthrough product developments
  • Global Salmon Production: Total Harvest of Atlantic Salmon, 2016-2020
  • Salmon Production Cost Breakdown
  • Consumer Behavior Analysis: By Region, By Age, By Gender, By Annual Household Income, Seasonal of Fish
  • Fresh Salmon Export: Trends & Predictions for the Supply of Salmon Consumed (USD Million) in the United States; Largest Fishing Companies
  • Regulatory Landscape: Section 6 of Norwegian Aquaculture Act , Aquaculture Stewardship Council Salmon standard, RSPCA welfare standards for Farmed Atlantic salmon, A Greener World (AGW), Marine Stewardship Council (MSC)

The global Salmon market report answers questions such as:

  • What is the market size and forecast of the Global Salmon Market?
  • What are the inhibiting factors and impact of COVID-19 on the Global Salmon Market during the assessment period?
  • Which are the products/segments/applications/areas to invest in over the assessment period in the Global Salmon Market?
  • What is the competitive strategic window for opportunities in the Global Salmon Market?
  • What are the technology trends and regulatory frameworks in the Global Salmon Market?
  • What is the market share of the leading players in the Global Salmon Market?
  • What modes and strategic moves are considered favorable for entering the Global Salmon Market?

Key Topics Covered:

Chapter 1. Research Framework

Chapter 2. Executive Summary: Global Salmon Market

Chapter 3. Global Salmon Market Overview

3.1. Industry Value Chain Analysis

3.1.1. Raw Material

3.1.2. Processing and Packaging

3.1.3. Distributor

3.1.4. End User

3.2. Industry Outlook

3.2.1. Global Salmon Production

3.2.2. Salmon Production Cost Breakdown

3.2.3. Fresh Salmon Export

3.2.4. Consumer Behavior Analysis

3.2.4.1. Income

3.2.4.2. Occupation

3.2.4.3. Seasonal of Fish

3.2.5. Trends and Predictions for the Supply of Salmon Consumed in the United States

3.2.6. Largest Fishing Companies

3.3. PESTLE Analysis

3.4. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

3.4.1. Bargaining Power of Suppliers

3.4.2. Bargaining Power of Buyers

3.4.3. Threat of Substitutes

3.4.4. Threat of New Entrants

3.4.5. Degree of Competition

3.5. Market Dynamics and Trends

3.5.1. Key Trends

3.5.2. Growth Drivers

3.5.3. Restraints/ Challenges

3.6. Market Growth and Outlook

3.6.1. Market Revenue Estimates and Forecast (US$ Mn), 2017-2027

3.6.2. Market Volume Estimates and Forecast (MMT), 2017-2027

3.6.3. Pricing Analysis

3.7. Covid-19 Impact Assessment on Market Growth Trend

3.7.1. Growth Trend Shift Analysis

3.7.2. Industry Best Practices

3.8. Regulatory Landscape

Chapter 4. Competition Dashboard

4.1. Market Concentration Rate

4.2. Company Market Share Analysis (Value %), 2020

4.3. Competitor Mapping

Chapter 5. Salmon Market Analysis, By Species

5.1. Key Insights

5.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

5.2.1. Atlantic

5.2.2. Pink

5.2.3. Chum/Dog

5.2.4. Coho

5.2.5. Sockeye

5.2.6. Others

Chapter 6. Salmon Market Analysis, By Fish Type

6.1. Key Insights

6.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

6.2.1. Farmed

6.2.2. Wild

Chapter 7. Salmon Market Analysis, By Product Type

7.1. Key Insights

7.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

7.2.1. Canned

7.2.2. Fresh

7.2.3. Frozen

7.2.4. Others

Chapter 8. Salmon Market Analysis, By Retail

8.1. Key Insights

8.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

8.2.1. Retail

8.2.1.1. E-commerce (online)

8.2.1.2. Brick & Mortar Stores (offline)

8.2.2. HoReCa & Wholesale

8.2.3. Processed Food Industry

8.2.4. Other Institutional Customers

Chapter 9. Salmon Market Analysis, By Region

9.1. Key Insights

9.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

9.2.1. North America

9.2.1.1. The U.S.

9.2.1.2. Canada

9.2.1.3. Mexico

9.2.2. Europe

9.2.2.1. Western Europe

9.2.2.1.1. The UK

9.2.2.1.2. Germany

9.2.2.1.3. France

9.2.2.1.4. Italy

9.2.2.1.5. Spain

9.2.2.1.6. Rest of Western Europe

9.2.2.2. Eastern Europe

9.2.2.2.1. Poland

9.2.2.2.2. Russia

9.2.2.2.3. Rest of Eastern Europe

9.2.3. Asia Pacific

9.2.3.1. China

9.2.3.2. India

9.2.3.3. Japan

9.2.3.4. Australia & New Zealand

9.2.3.5. ASEAN

9.2.3.6. Rest of Asia Pacific

9.2.4. Middle East & Africa

9.2.4.1. UAE

9.2.4.2. Saudi Arabia

9.2.4.3. South Africa

9.2.4.4. Rest of MEA

9.2.5. South America

9.2.5.1. Argentina

9.2.5.2. Brazil

9.2.5.3. Rest of South America

Chapter 10. North America Salmon Market Analysis

10.1. Key Insights

10.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

10.2.1. By Species

10.2.2. By Type

10.2.3. By Product

10.2.4. By Distribution Channel

10.2.5. By Country

Chapter 11. Europe Salmon Market Analysis

11.1. Key Insights

11.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

11.2.1. By Species

11.2.2. By Type

11.2.3. By Product

11.2.4. By Distribution Channel

11.2.5. By Country

Chapter 12. Asia Pacific Salmon Market Analysis

12.1. Key Insights

12.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

12.2.1. By Species

12.2.2. By Type

12.2.3. By Product

12.2.4. By Distribution Channel

12.2.5. By Country

Chapter 13. Middle East and Africa Salmon Market Analysis

13.1. Key Insights

13.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

13.2.1. By Species

13.2.2. By Type

13.2.3. By Product

13.2.4. By Distribution Channel

13.2.5. By Country

Chapter 14. South America Salmon Market Analysis

14.1. Key Insights

14.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

14.2.1. By Species

14.2.2. By Type

14.2.3. By Product

14.2.4. By Distribution Channel

14.2.5. By Country

Chapter 15. Company Profile (Company Overview, Financial Matrix, Key Product landscape, Key Personnel, Key Competitors, Contact Address, and Business Strategy Outlook) *

15.1. Cremaq Group ASA

15.2. Leroy Seafood Group ASA

15.3. Mowi ASA

15.4. SalMar ASA

15.5. AquaChile

15.6. Cooke Aquaculture

15.7. Bakkafrost

15.8. Grieg Seafood

15.9. Multiexport

15.10. Blumar

15.11. Salmones Camanchaca

15.12. Australis Seafoods

15.13. Nova Sea

15.14. Tassal Group

15.15. Sinkaberg-Hansen

15.16. Nordlaks

15.17. Bremnes Seashore

15.18. Norway Royal Salmon

15.19. Alsaker Fjordbruk

15.20. Other Prominent players

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/di479t

Media Contact:

Research and Markets

Laura Wood, Senior Manager

press@researchandmarkets.com

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470

For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630

For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907

Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-salmon-market-to-2027---by-species-fish-type-distribution-channel-product-type-and-region-301498918.html

SOURCE Research and Markets

DISCLAIMER FOR COMMENTS: The views expressed by public comments are not those of this company or its affiliated companies. Please note by clicking on "Post" you acknowledge that you have read the TERMS OF USE and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Your comments may be used on air. Be polite. Inappropriate posts or posts containing offsite links, images, GIFs, inappropriate language, or memes may be removed by the moderator. Job listings and similar posts are likely automated SPAM messages from Facebook and are not placed by WFMZ-TV.

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

The Aquaculture Stewardship Council has a standard for salmon farming, which includes guidelines for additive use.

The RSPCA has welfare standards for farmed Atlantic salmon, which may include guidelines for additive use.

In China, the use of additives in salmon farming is regulated by the Food Safety Law, which standardizes food additive use and storage.

Title:

Content: People 's Daily Online > > Economy and Technology
The General Administration of Market Supervision announced new regulations on food additive management to solicit opinions from the public
November 14, 2022 15: 12 | Source: People's Daily Online
Small number
Beijing, November 14 (Reporter Sun Boyang) Reporters learned from the General Administration of Market Supervision that in order to further standardize the management of food additives, the General Administration of Market Supervision drafted the "Announcement on further standardizing the management of food additives for catering service providers (draft for comments)" (hereinafter referred to as the "draft for comments"), open for public comments.
According to the draft, catering service providers should strictly follow the principles of food additive use, the types of food additives allowed to be used, the scope of use and the maximum amount of use or residue, and standardize the management of food additives.
The draft also requires that food service enterprises should treat the management of food additives as an important part of daily control, weekly inspection and monthly scheduling.
According to the draft, catering service providers should set up counters (places) to store food additives, mark the words "food additives", and store them separately from food and food-related products.
The draft requires that the use of food additives by catering service providers must not cover up food corruption and deterioration; must not cover up the quality defects of the food itself or the processing process or use food additives for the purpose of doping, adulteration and counterfeiting.
At the same time, catering service providers are encouraged to promise to consumers to standardize the use of food additives and publicize the use of food additives.
The "Draft for Solicitation of Comments" proposed that local market supervision departments should urge catering service providers to implement the main responsibility of food safety, strictly implement the requirements of this announcement, and standardize the management of food additives.
Strengthen supervision and sampling inspection in the catering service sector, and investigate and punish those who use food additives in excess of scope and in excess of limit in accordance with Article 124 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
Any person suspected of committing a crime shall be transferred to a public security organ.
(Editor: Sun Hongli, Lu Qian)
Public Number ： People 's Network Finance
Share it so more people can see it.
Back to top

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning antibiotics in farmes salmon?

The General Administration of Market Supervision regulates food additive use, including in salmon farming, and ensures that food additives are stored separately from food products.

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

The use of additives in salmon farming can have environmental impacts, such as pollution and waste, and reducing their use can have economic benefits, such as reducing the cost of feed.

Compound feed can cut down on fish use and is cheaper, making it a more economical option for salmon farmers.

China reduced feed-grade fish use by 77 percent in some aquaculture trials, which can help reduce the environmental impact of salmon farming.

Replacing feed-grade fish with compound feed can reduce pollution and protect vulnerable ocean ecosystems.

The economic value of salmon aquaculture can be affected by the use of additives, and reducing their use can help maintain a healthy and sustainable industry.

Title:

Content: Our Future

Economic value of key fisheries and aquaculture sectors drop, report says

April 8 2024 - 5:00am
The economic value of both salmon aquaculture and the rock lobster fishery reduced during 2020-21. File picture

Tasmania's key fisheries and aquatic sectors contributed just over $800 million towards the state's economy in 2020-21, according to a new report from the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS).

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

$0/

(min cost $0)

or signup to continue reading

See subscription options

Duncan Bailey

Journalist

Passionate about all things happening in the North East with a focus on health and politics. Got a story? Get in touch: duncan.bailey@examiner.com.au

Get the latest Launceston news in your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.

Land-based salmon farming can reduce marine pollution and is a more sustainable option for the industry.

Title:

Content: Alert
The first wave of large-scale private school exits has hit the "Carpentry School" with more directors and supervisors.
More than 70% of the mortgage can be borrowed from the central bank.
Remember to bring an umbrella after work! 11 counties and cities rain special report to fear the road to night
More than 300 people change their name to eat enough … your favorite salmon is abused and pollutes the sea? Netflix "Ocean Conspiracy" exposed to the black screen
In the past, more than 300 people in Taiwan changed their name after turning around the famous sushi restaurant “Sushi Lang ” to launch the“ Free Salmon to Eat ” campaign, setting off a “salmon chaos ” in society, showing the people ’ s love for salmon.
With Netflix ’ s new ecological crisis documentary “Seaspiracy ”, which exposes the problems of antibiotics released by“ sea captive salmon ” and fears of pollution, as well as millions of salmon crammed in underwater cages, mercilessly attacked by fish lice, and violating the nature of wild migration, people can ’ t help but look at the issue of animal persecution. It has been proven to sense pain.
What are the cruelties hidden in the world-famous seafood “farmed salmon ”?
How can fish welfare be improved?
More than 300 people changed their name to "salmon" to eat! The salmon that Taiwanese love to eat is not wild at all.
As with many livestock farms on the land, salmon is of high economic value, so many aquaculture operators around the world use sea box nets to trap and breed salmon in captivity, and regularly feed them to pipelines in order to obtain huge "salmon gold" business opportunities.
If you look at Taiwan from a perspective, according to the statistics of customs imports and exports in 2020, the weight of locally imported “captive salmon ” alone is as high as 18,000 tons, with a total value of about NT $5.15 billion.
On the other hand, even if the world is hit by the epidemic in 2020, Norway, the world ’ s largest exporter of salmon, not only will the production of salmon still reach 1.1 million tons, but the export volume will also reach a record second high.
But with the release of Netflix ’ s new marine crisis documentary “Seaspiracy ” in 2023, the blood-soaked disclosure of the sea farming salmon behind the following three unknown dark sides, finally let the terrible“ salmon hell ” shake the world.
1.
High-density farmed salmon have nowhere to escape! Scales and fins are mercilessly devoured by sea lice parasites
Compared to free wild salmon, captive salmon are likely to be crowded together by the fish, constantly colliding, friction, conflict, and nowhere to hide, resulting in scales, kisses, and fins are broken, infectious anemia, spinal deformities and other symptoms, and are more likely to be parasitized by sea lice.
For example, a survey by the global animal lobby welfare organization Compassion in World Farming found that floating dead fish can be found everywhere in crowded salmon farms, and such a harsh living environment is simply a hotbed for the spread of disease.
What is even more frightening is that once the salmon is entangled in sea lice, the scales, skin tissue, surface mucus and blood on the body will soon become food for the parasites.
As the scales of the salmon gradually disappear, in addition to the pain of the body beginning to erode, the pain of infection in the wound or loss of immunity can also plunge them into the abyss of death.
For example, in the clip of "The Ocean Conspiracy", it directly captures the horror of the salmon being eaten alive by a parasite to the eyes, the limbs, and the body.
2.
Marine farmed salmon put into chemicals, antibiotics! Marine pollution affects ecological food chain
In order to solve the salmon nightmare, farmers have to put a lot of irritating chemicals and antibiotics into the box to remove sea lice and reduce the risk of disease in high-density breeding, or to increase the water temperature and try to kill sea lice.
But the pumps and containers used by the former to transport chemicals have undoubtedly made the salmon's sea cages smaller and tighter, while the temperature of the latter has already exceeded the range that the salmon can adapt to, and each of them has brought great pain to the salmon.
At the same time, antibiotics and pesticides flowing into the sea will of course lead to pollution of the surrounding environment, and the organic waste generated by captive salmon will also seriously affect the entire bottom ecology.
In April 2023, the environmental group Greenpeace accused Chile ’ s salmon farming industry of dumping sewage into the ocean, killing more than 5,000 tons of salmon from oxidation.
3.
Undersea cages violate the migratory nature of wild salmon! Millions of animals are ignored
Not only that, Scotland, the world ’ s third largest Atlantic salmon farming exporter, which supplies about 10% of Taiwan ’ s salmon imports each year, has also been raised by the farm animal protection group Compassion in World Farming (CIWF) at the end of 2020, pointing directly to the 22 farms of the local five largest salmon farming companies, and raising millions of salmon in the sea bottom in one breath, completely depriving them of their migratory nature.
Because the migratory nature of salmon has always been a mystery in the animal world, some studies have suggested that salmon can always find the "origin" by remembering the special smell of their birthplace, or by being guided by the magnetic fields of the Sun and Earth.
Regardless of the truth, the physiological structure of salmon is obviously sensitive to sensing the environment, judging the location, and even evading electric shocks in real time.
Therefore, allowing them to roam aimlessly in the box for many years is a kind of cruelty to the body and spirit, depriving the fish instinct of long-distance migration.
All the unhealthy salmon raised in captivity are eaten by humans!
Food chain security in jeopardy
In other words, the three major concerns of captive salmon at sea have caused more than 25% of Scotland ’ s fish populations to suffer and die before they are slaughtered, resulting in a huge waste of food and a complete disregard for animal welfare.
In addition, countless dead fish have been dumped directly in open barrels by Scottish farmers, allowing wild birds and other wildlife to come into contact for food, potentially endangering the safety of other ecological chains.
Salmon farming on land is more humane to the earth! Salmon business opportunities and marine conservation to create food sustainability
Fortunately, this traditional salmon farming method is expected to gradually come to an end.
Because the international company Atlantic Sapphire has been developing "land salmon farm" for 10 years, and in 2022, it invested nearly 4 billion US dollars (about 112 billion US dollars) to build the world's largest land salmon farm Bluehouse in Florida, the United States.
The biggest feature of the land salmon farm is the use of the Recirculating Aquaculture System (RAS) to effectively control the temperature, salinity, pH and oxygen content of the water body, and effectively eliminate carbon dioxide and filter waste, to ensure that the salmon are free from parasites and diseases, while reducing the possibility of marine pollution.
Johan Andreassen, CEO of Atlantic Sapphire: “Ten years ago no one believed that farming salmon on land was financially viable; now Atlantic Sapphire is finally proving that it works, so the question now is how much competition there will be and how much scale there will be in this industry. ”
In order to prove that land-based salmon farming will eventually become a trend in the marine industry, Atlantic Sapphire CEO Johan Andreassen is also looking further into the future, with an estimated 372,000 square meters of fish tanks on about 650,000 square meters of land by 2031, allowing land-based salmon to meet 41% of the annual salmon consumption in the United States.
Also thanks to Atlantic Sapphire, one of the world ’ s largest salmon producers, Norwegian company Grieg Seafood has entered into a joint venture with Årdal Aqua to build a 5,000-tonne annual land farm there.
Salmon Evolution, also from Norway, joined forces with Dongwon Industries, South Korea ’ s largest seafood company, in 2023 to expand its “salmon footprint ” to South Korea.
At the same time, Benchmark Genetics, an aquaculture company that has always strictly controlled the quality of salmon eggs, now sells up to 10% of its salmon eggs to the land-based farming industry to improve the yield and quality of “land-based captive salmon. ”
People from all walks of life, through their own efforts, hope to work for the welfare of salmon, no longer be poisoned by the lust of human words, even if they reproduce artificially, they can also maintain their physical and mental health, and achieve the true meaning of "sustainable food" on earth.
Extended reading:
Taitung version roasted sushi to eat raw meat? Ami youth innovates traditional cuisine with Japanese soul
24 / 7 APP monitoring of Taiwan 's sea bream! Yunlin' s "0 turtle pond" creates 42 times more than 300 million business opportunities
(This article is from the 2023.07.02 "Vision" website and is prohibited from reproducing without consent.)
Salmon Sushi Lang Switching Sushi Netflix
Related News
We can cool down! 11 counties and cities have been warned to rain into the night.
The weather is hot, and an afternoon thunderstorm can cool down slightly.
The weather bureau issued a special report on heavy rain in 11 counties and cities in Taoyuan at 15: 45.
More than 300 people change their name to eat enough … your favorite salmon is abused and pollutes the sea? Netflix "Ocean Conspiracy" exposed to the black screen
In the past, more than 300 people in Taiwan changed their name after turning around the famous sushi restaurant “Sushi Lang ” to launch the“ Free Salmon to Eat ” campaign, setting off a “salmon chaos ” in society, showing the people ’ s love for salmon.
With Netflix ’ s new ecological crisis documentary “Seaspiracy ”, which exposes the problems of antibiotics released by“ sea captive salmon ” and fears of pollution, as well as millions of salmon crammed in underwater cages, mercilessly attacked by fish lice, and violating the nature of wild migration, people can ’ t help but look at the issue of animal persecution. It has been proven to sense pain.
What are the cruelties hidden in the world-famous seafood “farmed salmon ”?
How can fish welfare be improved?
Study: Brain shrinks from 17,000 years ago
As the climate changes, species evolve to change their physiological structures to adapt to the climate, but not necessarily for the better.
An analysis of 50,000 years of climate records and human remains has revealed an adaptive response to a decrease in human brain size, possibly due to environmental stress caused by higher temperatures around 15,000 years ago.
Summer infection and heatstroke cases may peak, man's body temperature is 41.8 degrees and he is in a coma.
According to the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the number of heat injuries from January to June this year reached 956, a new high in three years.
Dr. Kao Wei-feng, chief physician of the Department of Emergency Medicine at the Taipei Medical University Hospital...
A picture of the weather! "Hot Roasted Potato" Relaxed This Afternoon Thunderstorm Until the Weekend
The temperature in Yuli Township, Hualien County was the highest today at 38.3 degrees.
The Central Weather Bureau issued a high temperature signal for tomorrow's 12 counties and cities in the afternoon, but starting tomorrow,...
Taiwan Railway R200 diesel locomotive unveiled
Taiwan Railway 's new R200 diesel-electric locomotive was officially unveiled at a new car meeting in Changhua Fan Garage this afternoon. Minister of Communications Wang Guocai said that Taiwan Railway has compiled a 100 billion yuan car purchase plan in recent years.
udn Forum
Product recommendation

Atlantic Sapphire built a large land salmon farm in Florida, which can help reduce the environmental impact of salmon farming.

Microbubble oxygenation reduces marine pollution and increases growth rate, making it a viable option for salmon farmers.

Title:

Content: 【 Environmental Technology 】 Microbubble Oxygenation Technology Effectively Reduces Marine Cultivation Pollution
Technology 11: 00 2022 / 04 / 09
Share:
The study found that microbubble oxygenation successfully increased the growth rate of shrimp and other aquaculture species, while reducing the amount of clean water needed for aquaculture facilities to operate. (AFP)
The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) estimates that more than a third of the world ’ s natural marine resources have been overfished, affecting the ecological level of sustainable development.
However, seafood farming produces organic pollutants, which also have a negative impact on the environment.
Researchers have developed new technologies that not only reduce pollution from seafood farming, but also increase seafood production.
【 Medical Technology 】 Australia develops mobile app to detect COVID-19 with coughing sound instead of fast test
Waste water caused by lack of oxygen in the farm
Because seafood consumes a lot of food during aquaculture, the feces and food residues produced by it will still be discharged into the fence and become waste water.
Wastewater is rich in nutrients for plankton and bacteria, and can catalyze the rate of reproduction.
The process of decomposing nutrients and breathing in waste water consumes dissolved oxygen in the water, resulting in hypoxia in the farm environment, which affects seafood production.
To address this vicious cycle, Faik Hamad, associate professor of engineering at Teesside University, teamed up with Poo Balan Ganesan, associate professor of engineering at the University of Malaya, to develop a “micro-bubble aeration technology ” that provides a safer, chemical-free and low-energy alternative to seawater disinfection.
[Cryptocurrency] US company uses coal waste to power cryptocurrency “mining ”
The microbubbles produced by the microbubbles they developed release free radicals (OH ions) that can detoxify wastewater and degrade organic pollutants.
Microbubbles also increase the level of dissolved oxygen in the water, increasing the viability of seafood, and then increasing the production of seafood.
Shrimp growth rate increased by 30%
The study found that microbubble oxygenation successfully increased the growth rate of shrimp and other aquaculture species, while reducing the amount of clean water needed for aquaculture facilities to operate.
The study has tested aquaculture species such as seawater white shrimp and giant freshwater shrimp, and found that they have increased their growth rate by 30%.
“Microbubble oxygenation technology has become a potential new direction for the seafood farming industry. ” Poo Balan Ganesan said,“ This technology will make the industry more economically and environmentally sustainable, while also maximizing productivity and land use efficiency while reducing energy demand and the negative impact of the previous industry. ”
For each episode of "Entrepreneurship ideas", please come to Hong Kong corporate brands to share tips for doing business under the epidemic.
See the latest episode:
Editor-in-Chief: Chen Cheuk-Hsien
Open hket app and read more
Follow the latest financial news analysis, like hket Facebook
Subscribe to the Hong Kong Economic Times email newsletter
Receive first-hand financial news Learn more about investment and financial knowledge Submit my consent to receive promotional messages from Hong Kong Economic Times Group. You may also check the privacy policy of this website Terms of Use

Microbubble technology reduces pollution and increases seafood production, which can help minimize the need for additives.

Domestic feed production can help reduce the use of additives, and domestic feed contains 40% raw protein and essential amino acids.

Title:

Content: Russian food will increase the mass of salmon fish three times - RIA Novosti, 02.10.2023
Registration was successful!
Please follow the link from the letter sent to
Science
Russian food will increase the mass of salmon fish three times
© iStock.com / mtcuradoКумжа
Read ria.ru in
MOSCOW, October 2 – RIA Novosti.
A new all-domestic starter food for salmon fish was presented by NArFU scientists.
According to them, the results of the experiments showed an increase in the weight of the model by almost three times, which is comparable to the effect of the use of high-quality imported analogues, the press service of the university reported.
Today, as the experts of the university note, special feeds are used for high productivity of aqua farms that can give the maximum increase in fish weight with a minimum feed coefficient.
However, at the moment about 80% of such feed on the market is imported, which creates problems in the supply of domestic farms.
In Russia, they learned how much microplastics contain the White and Barents Seas
Researchers of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov (NArFU) presented experimental formulations of starter feed for young salmon species of fish, the effectiveness of which is comparable to imported analogues, and the price is half as low due to the use of only domestic components.
“
“The feed is rich in essential amino acids, it contains more than 40% of the mass fraction of raw protein, which allows us to consider the developed composition of the feed formulation as a full-fledged, balanced and high-quality product ready for use in the industrial production of fish farms, ” said Alexander Antonov, Head of the Department of Landscape Architecture and Artificial Forests of NArFU.
© Photo: NArFU / Alexander AntonovStarter food for salmon fish, developed in NArFU
Starter feed for salmon fish, developed in NArFU
1 of 2
© Photo: NArFU / Alexander AntonovMolod kumzhi, grown during the experiment
Young Trout Cultivated in the Experiment
2 of 2
Starter feed for salmon fish, developed in NArFU
1 of 2
Young Trout Cultivated in the Experiment
2 of 2
The effectiveness of the domestic "diet" was tested on the basis of the Solzensky production and experimental salmon plant in the Arkhangelsk region.
As a model fish, trout was chosen - lake or brook fish from the salmon family.
"At the end of the experiment - after 40 days of feeding - the increase in fish weight was 187% (mass increased by 2.9 times), in length by 32%.
On average, trout by weight grew by 7.2% (0.24 g) per day, which is a good indicator that is comparable to the results of changes in the biometric values of fish that feed on high-quality imported feed, "Antonov said.
In Russia found a way to accelerate the growth of the number of sturgeon
He added that the project is very promising for commercialization, and can be widely used both in large industrial water farms and in private business.
All work on the production of feed was carried out in the feed shop of the NArFU Aquaculture Center on Russian equipment.
According to the scientist, the main goal that now stands before the team is the development of a line of forage for trout and obtaining safe fish products in conditions of mass production.
The research was carried out within the framework of the REC project "Russian Arctic: New Materials, Technologies and Research Methods" with the support of the Ministry of Economic Development, Industry and Science of the Arkhangelsk Region.
"They're coming for wine."
Debunked myths around one of the most mysterious fish
News feed
0
New firstOld firstFirst
loader
On-line
Title of the material to be opened
To participate in the discussion,
log in or register
loader
Discussions
Title of the material to be opened

Domestic feed can be used in industrial and private water farms, making it a more sustainable option for the industry.

Overall, the use of additives in salmon farming is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits, as well as the development of effective regulatory frameworks to ensure consumer safety and promote sustainable aquaculture practices.

Title:

Content: Miscellaneous
Study warns of the risk of common food additives on the health of offspring if taken during pregnancy!
Spain – Eating a common additive in ultra-processed foods during pregnancy may increase the risk of health problems in offspring, scientists say.
A Spanish study on rats found that two common emulsions used to bind food chemicals led their offspring to develop physical and mental health problems, such as anxiety.
The study looked at two additives — carboxymethylcellulose and polysorbate 80 — found in thousands of foods, including microwaves, butter, sauces and ice cream, adding to a long list of health problems caused by eating too many ultra-processed foods, a staple of the American diet.
The researchers gave the female mice water containing 1% emulsifiers, the maximum amount allowed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Typically, between 0.25% and 0.8% are added to food.
The mice continued to receive water during pregnancy and lactation.
The control group was given water without emulsions.
They found that the offspring of mice experienced unintentional weight loss and anxious behaviors at the age of 10 weeks.
Male rats were more likely to lose weight, while females suffered from anxiety more often.
This is because the emulsions disrupted neural connections in the hypothalamus, the brain structure that serves as the body ’ s control center.
The hypothalamus produces leptin, a hormone that makes the body consume more energy, leading to weight loss.
Unintentional weight loss, when uncontrolled, can lead to serious health consequences, including malnutrition.
Female rats also experienced higher levels of anxiety.
While the mice in the study lost weight, the high rates of obesity suggest that additives in processed foods can cause the opposite effect in humans.
For example, a global comparative study published in Obesity Reviews showed that an increase in an individual ’ s consumption of ultra-processed foods and beverages was associated with a higher body mass index (BMI).
Jessica Cording, a registered dietitian in New York City, told the Daily Mail previously, “[Processed superfoods] tend to be very high in sodium, things like sodium, sugar, refined carbohydrates in general, unhealthy fats, as well as preservatives. ”
Although the health effects in the new study are mild, they add to a long list of complications that previous research has found.
For example, a 2022 study in the Journal of Neuroscience found that increasing the consumption of ultra-processed foods by 10% could increase the risk of dementia.
In addition, a large study in France found that the same increase in ultra-processed foods led to an increased risk of breast cancer.
Two studies by researchers in Spain and France found a link between consumption of ultra-processed foods and an increased risk of premature death.
In the new study, the researchers said more research is needed to clarify how these effects in mice translate into how healthy they are in humans.
The study was published in the journal PLOS Biology.
Source: Daily Mail
You can read the news from the source here.
About News Source
Libyan Observatory Newspaper

The detection of additives in salmon feed and tissue is a crucial aspect of ensuring the safety and quality of farmed salmon, and modern methods such as DNA macrobarcode technology and real-time fluorescent PCR are being used for this purpose.

Title:

Content: People 's Daily Online > > Economy and Technology
This detection technology allows adulterated meat products to be hidden
April 05, 2022 08: 59 | Source: Science and Technology Daily
Small number
Original title: "Lamb head selling dog meat"? This detection technology makes adulterated meat products invisible
The unqualified sauerkraut is packaged into old altar sauerkraut, and the high-priced sweet potato powder is replaced by low-priced cassava powder... On March 15, CCTV 3 15 evening exposed a series of problem foods.
A few days ago, a Jiangsu couple was punished for selling pork when beef was discovered by the management department, which also attracted the attention and hot discussion of netizens.
“Eat first, eat first. ”
Using pork and duck to fake beef and mutton, using low-priced meat to impersonate high-priced meat, adulteration of meat in animal-derived food has been one of the main problems affecting food quality and safety.
So how should we conduct meat adulteration detection quickly, accurately and efficiently, so as to better protect the people's "meat basket" and ensure people's health?
DNA Macro Barcode Technology Emerges as a New Method for Identification of Meat Ingredients
The sale of meat is an old faux pas.
Although China has formulated relevant regulations to supervise the quality and safety of meat and meat products, in recent years, with the increasing demand of beef and mutton markets, it can bring huge profits to the poor, and the phenomenon of meat adulteration is still common.
How to identify fake beef?
Some people on the Internet use the "look, smell and ask" to carefully observe: with the eyes to see, observe and distinguish; with the nose to smell the smell of meat; with the hands to feel the elasticity of meat...
However, it is still too difficult for consumers to identify fake meat by their own eyes.
Therefore, strengthening the detection technology to tackle key problems and continuously improve the detection ability has become an important task of market supervision departments.
"Fast, effective, accurate and reliable detection technology is the key means to effectively supervise meat adulteration." Gan Yongqi, deputy director and deputy director of the microbiology department of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Food and Drug Inspection Institute, said that DNA detection methods are highly specific and sensitive, and the results are not easily affected by food processing methods.
Gan Yongqi introduced that DNA barcodes are special regions in DNA, usually composed of central variable regions and bilateral conserved regions used to distinguish target species, which can be used as genetic markers of an organism.
Adulterated meat species can be identified by PCR amplification and sequencing of specific regions of DNA fragments, and then by searching online databases for comparison.
In recent years, with the development of gene sequencing technology, DNA macrobarcode technology came into being.
"DNA macrobarcode technology combines DNA barcode and high-throughput sequencing technology, which is more powerful than traditional DNA barcode, and has the characteristics of high throughput, high precision and fast speed. It provides an ideal method for detecting multiple species in food matrix at the same time, including non-expected species.
How to specifically apply DNA macro barcode technology to detect meat and its products?
Gan Yongqi introduced that in order to identify the species in the sample, first establish a reliable database containing the DNA barcode of the target species.
The specific primer is used for PCR amplification of the barcode sequence of the species DNA and obtaining the amplifiers, then the amplifiers from different samples are combined, different amplifiers are sequenced at the same time in one program operation, the sequenced species gene sequence is matched with the barcode database, and finally the identification result is obtained through bioinformatics software analysis.
"The method can simultaneously perform the composition and component sequencing analysis of at least 96 samples in 6 hours, improving the efficiency of detection and saving time and labor costs," said Gan Yongqi.
Recently, Gan Yongqi 's laboratory purchased 11 different types of meat products from the market, such as sausage, ham sausage, bacon, bacon, bacon, hot pot meat slices, dried meatballs, meatballs, kebabs, canned meats, etc. A total of more than 70 copies, using DNA macrobarcode technology for the detection of animal-derived components.
"The results of each sample sequencing analysis were in line with expectations.
For example, five different animal ingredients were detected in one fish seed package, namely chicken, pig, duck, bighead and trevally, which were consistent with the product label, Gan Yongqi said.
In recent years, the laboratory has selected species such as bony fish, cartilaginous fish, mammals, birds, reptiles and other species from the domestic meat products market, the natural environment and the list of national key protected wildlife as research objects, and has built a classification database of more than 1,500 genera and more than 2,700 species of animals.
He said that the laboratory is currently expanding the range of test samples, in-depth research on the specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of meat adulteration detection methods.
DNA macrobarcode technology is widely used in many fields around the world
In the past 20 years, gene sequencing technology has experienced the development of first-generation sequencing, second-generation sequencing and third-generation sequencing, and has made great progress in scale, throughput and application.
"The development of second-generation sequencing technology has laid the foundation for a huge increase in sequencing throughput and a reduction in costs.
Three-generation sequencing technology can meet the requirements of long read and rapid sequencing of whole genome, "said Gan Yongqi.
At present, what are the challenges faced by DNA macro barcode technology in meat doping detection?
Studies have shown that the current standard DNA barcodes used for classification and identification of animals and plants are not fully suitable for use in environmental samples.
For starters, standard DNA barcodes tend to be specific regions that can identify similar species, often with longer gene sequences.
However, DNA in the environment tends to degrade into shorter gene segments, which hampers the amplification of barcodes.
Second, DNA macrobarcoding technology needs to amplify the DNA of all species in a sample at the same time, so excessive amplification of some species must be limited.
Therefore, it is necessary to screen and compare several non-standard candidate barcodes to determine new DNA regions to meet the limitations of this method.
In addition, in the quantitative analysis of species diversity, due to some factors in the high-throughput sequencing process, the results may be biased, which in turn affects the accuracy of the quantitative estimation of species in the original sample.
As one of the main problems of food safety, adulteration of meat and its products has attracted more and more attention in recent years.
Despite some challenges, DNA macrobarcode technology can quickly and accurately identify unknown species, which undoubtedly provides an excellent technical means for meat adulteration detection.
In addition to meat adulteration detection, what other areas can DNA macrobarcoding technology currently be used in?
“In theory, almost any sample could be identified by DNA barcoding.
In recent years, the technology has been applied in many fields, such as ecology, forensic science, biotechnology, food industry, animal diet, food quality and so on. "Gan Yongqi said.
At present, DNA macro barcode technology has been widely used in many fields around the world.
However, because the technology has not formed a perfect detection standard at home and abroad, it is limited to the research stage.
Gan Yongqi said that based on the research of the technology, their team has applied for two national invention patents and one group standard for detection methods, and will build a free and shared data analysis network platform in the future to clear the obstacles for the application of the technology.
There are four main methods of identifying common animal-derived ingredients.
What other biotechnologies can be used to detect adulteration in meat?
Gan Yongqi said that the current common meat products authenticity identification methods include four kinds of authenticity identification methods based on morphology, metabolomics, proteomics and genomics.
Gan Yongqi introduced that the morphological method has developed from the original optical microscopy technology that relies more on experimental operators to a new identification method that combines electron microscopy and data image analysis. The method is simple in operation, high in flux and low in cost, but the accuracy is not high, and is commonly used as a rapid screening method.
He said that the nucleic acid detection method is specific, high sensitivity, the result is not easy to be affected by the way of food processing, but also can detect heat-treated meat products, stability and accuracy are higher, so it has become the mainstream method of animal-derived component identification.
Commonly used techniques are polymerase chain reaction (PCR), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), amplification fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), DNA sequencing, etc., which can distinguish the species of animals and can even be used for animal variety identification and individual identification, and has been widely used in the traceability system of meat.
"In addition, real-time fluorescent PCR technology is also currently used for the identification and quantitative detection of animal-derived components." Gan Yongqi said.
(Editor: Zhao Zhuqing, Chen Jian)
Share it so more people can see it.
Back to top

The use of probiotics, such as Lactic Acid Bacillus B4, in salmon farming has been shown to improve fish growth and immunity.

Title:

Content: Yogurt is amazing! Feeding Wu Guo to eat for 2 months, the fisherman smiles and wears a helmet: anti-collision
▲ The water laboratory said that in recent years, due to climate change, the unusually high temperature in the summer, it is easy to cause the fish to be attacked by germs. (Photo by reporter Yang Chih-hing)
Journalist Hsu Chien-yi / reporting from Taipei
In recent years, the unusually high temperature in summer has led to the outbreak of germs, which has caused great losses to farmers. The probiotic Lactic Acid Bacillus B4, which helps to improve fish growth and enhance their immunity, and its glucan product Lactic Acid Bacillus B4 functional yogurt was added to the feed. Farming time to reduce the risk of breeding.
The water laboratory pointed out that glucan can be used as an emulsifier and thickener flavor carrier in food processing. In terms of health care, research shows that glucan can be used as a prebiotic to increase the number of probiotics - bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria in the body, and regulate immunity.
As mentioned in the water test, lactic acid bacteria B4, previously screened from the gut of perch fish, is a probiotic with special enzymes. Adding cheap sucrose can promote the production of glucan by lactic acid bacteria B4, and developed functional yogurt and ice cream containing glucan with lactic acid bacteria B4.
[Advertisement] Please continue reading...
According to the water test, the literature points out that probiotics or prebiotics such as glycans and oligosaccharides as feed additives can effectively improve the growth and immunity of fish and shrimp. The combined use of probiotics and prebiotics is usually higher than the combined effect of the two alone. Probiotics that produce pathogens can also produce glucans themselves, so the lactobacillus B4 yogurt is applied to aquaculture.
Experimental studies show that the addition of lactic acid bacteria B4 yogurt in the feed helps to improve the growth and resistance to pathogens.
▲ The feed in the test tank is evenly mixed with lactic acid bacteria B4 yogurt and the feed by an electric mixer.
(Photo / Supplied by Aquatic Research Institute)
In recent years, due to climate change, the unusually high temperature in summer can easily lead to the outbreak of germs, causing the death of fish and loss of farmers. Three years ago, the Kaohsiung City Animal Protection Department sought technical assistance from the water laboratory. 4 Yogurt feed for 2 months, fish feeding conditions are better than the control pond, growth is very fast, at the end of May harvest, no disease, fish average weight 570 grams, strong and healthy.
When the fish are harvested, the fisherman must wear a safety helmet to avoid being injured by the energetic Wu Kuo. The fish in the control pond eat worse than the test pond and grow more slowly. In mid-June, the fish suffered from streptococcus disease. It must be treated with drugs. The average weight is 467 grams, which is much lower than the average. Test pool.
The water laboratory further stressed that in order to understand whether the feed containing lactic acid bacteria B4 yogurt can really survive the cool summer, and the Kaohsiung Municipal Bureau of Animal Protection specially arranged the test in the summer the previous year. The results showed that although the test group and the control group of the fish containing lactic acid bacteria B4 yogurt were all suffering from streptococcal disease, the test group were milder drug. The treatment only takes 3 days to heal, and the control group is more serious, requiring more than 7 days of drug treatment.
Therefore, the addition of lactic acid bacteria B4 yogurt in broccoli feed helps to improve the growth and health of the fish, shortens the breeding time, reduces the breeding risk and slows the severity of the disease, and the cost of adding lactic acid bacteria B4 yogurt per kilogram of feed is only about 0.5 yuan.
Share with friends:
※ This article is copyrighted and cannot be reproduced without permission. [ETtoday Copyright Notice]
Related News
Hot News
The best video
And more.
Hot News
Back to the top.

Probiotics like Lactic Acid Bacillus B4 also produce glucan, which increases probiotics and regulates immunity in fish when sucrose is added.

The addition of yogurt feed containing Lactic Acid Bacillus B4 to the diet of fish for 2 months has been found to reduce disease and increase fish weight.

Farmed salmon may contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and artificial toxins, which are harmful to human health.

Title:

Content: Health & Beauty › Know the Health Benefits of Canned Salmon
Canned Salmon
When you need a quick lunch or dinner, eating canned foods is an easy and quick solution, and you can consider buying canned salmon as an alternative.
It is known that fish is a major source of omega-3 fatty acids, which are characterized by their health benefits to reduce the risk of heart disease, and in the next report we explain the benefits and harms, according to the report published in eatthis.
1) Get more omega-3
Omega-3 fatty acids are heart-healthy fats known for their anti-inflammatory properties, when consumed regularly, they contribute to normal cholesterol levels, and can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, and this makes them essential in any balanced diet, and salmon is an excellent source of omega-3 fatty acids.
2- Rich in protein
If you ’ re struggling to get enough protein in your diet, canned salmon may be an excellent solution, and one can of canned salmon contains about 34 grams of protein, which is 68% of the recommended daily value, according to certified nutritionist Serena Boone.
“Protein is an important nutrient that should make up about 10 to 35 percent of your total diet, and vegetable protein and protein from fish and poultry are best for your health and the environment, ” says Boone.
(c) Obtaining sodium
One disadvantage of eating canned foods is that they are salty, which helps to preserve them because they are already cooked, one can of salmon may contain 30% of your daily sodium needs – more than 650 milligrams.
This may not be a big problem if you are healthy and consume mostly fresh, unprocessed foods, however if you have high blood pressure or kidney problems, eating canned fish often may not be a good idea.
4 Get Calcium:
Although you should pay attention to sodium intake, there is a benefit to eating canned salmon: it is full of minerals, electrolytes, and calcium, as eating 3.5 ounces of canned salmon provides the same amount of calcium as a glass of skim milk.
5. Contains filtered chemicals
Nutrition expert Serena Boone has confirmed that canned foods can run the risk of containing bisphenol A, a known endocrine disruptor linked to cancer, and recommended that canned foods, including canned salmon, should be purchased in BPA-free packages.
6. Contains toxic chemicals:
Many brands of canned salmon contain farmed salmon, which can be a problem and is at greater risk for containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), artificial toxins that can have negative health effects on the immune, nervous and endocrine systems and can be linked to cancer.
Source: eatthis
You may also like...
Add this news to your site:
Copy the code at the top and paste it on your page, blog or site
This news contains no comments.
Be the first to comment on this news now!
Write your comment
Your name...
Email Address:
Your email will not be shown with comment
PASSWORD
86747.
Please enter the number that appears in front of you in the field of the PIN
Sign up for ArabNet 5 Newsletter
Galileo Site Manager - Galileo Site Manager ®

What health concerns are there specifically related to additives in farmed salmon feed?

Farmed salmon has higher PCB levels than wild salmon, with PCB levels being 8 times higher in farmed salmon.

Title:

Content: Miscellaneous
Publish Date: December 13, 2021 8: 47 GMT
Updated on: December 13, 2021 9: 40 GMT
Study: Eating Too Much ‘ Farm Salmon ’ May Cause Cancer
A medical study published on Monday warned that overeating salmon raised in farm ponds could lead to cancer.
The Daily Newspaper noted.
+ A -A
Source: Erm News
A medical study published on Monday warned that overeating salmon raised in farm ponds could lead to cancer.
The Daily Express newspaper pointed out that "some previous studies found that salmon, jam in ponds, which is widely consumed around the world, doubles the risk of prostate cancer," pointing out that "salmon is a useful food source for health because it contains omega-3 fatty acids."
"While one salmon is caught in open water, like the seas, the other is bred in tight spaces (farms and ponds), which could have implications for human health," the paper said.
Studies have found that PCBs in farm-raised salmon were about 8 times higher than concentrations in wild salmon, adding that PCBs have been banned for commercial use for decades, but their effects can still be found in the environment, which may adversely affect human diet and therefore health.
According to a study by the Environmental Defense Fund, eating salmon raised in farm ponds on a regular basis may increase the risk of cancer after multiple cases of contamination have been detected in the United States and other countries.
"Medical scientific findings, published in the Journal of Medical Sciences, suggest that cheap farmed salmon sold in stores may do more harm than good."
“Risk analysis suggests that consumption of farmed Atlantic salmon may pose health risks that detract from the beneficial effects of fish consumption, ” the study said.
Eating farmed salmon more than once a month may be enough to increase the risk of cancer.
"In multivariate analyses, men with the highest concentrations of PCBs were twice as likely to develop prostate cancer than men with the lowest concentrations."
Download Erm News app on your phone

What health concerns are there specifically related to additives in farmed salmon feed?

Eating farmed salmon may increase cancer risk due to the high levels of PCBs present in the fish.

What health concerns are there specifically related to additives in farmed salmon feed?

High PCB concentrations in farmed salmon can double the risk of prostate cancer in men.

What health concerns are there specifically related to additives in farmed salmon feed?

The consumption of farmed salmon with high levels of additives can have negative health effects on the immune and nervous systems.

The excess fat in farmed salmon can accumulate pollutants, making it a less healthy option for human consumption.

Farmed salmon can contain more Omega 3 than wild salmon, but the use of vegetable oils in feed can reduce the Omega 3 content.

The variable feed used in salmon farming can affect the nutritional content of farmed salmon, making it essential to regulate and monitor feed quality.

Reducing additives in salmon farming can mitigate environmental degradation.

IMTA systems reduce excess food and feces in water, which can help minimize the need for additives.

Mussels remove up to 54% of salmon waste materials, and oarweed removes soluble nutrients from the water column, reducing the need for additives.

Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture is a sustainable method that can reduce the need for antibiotics and additives.

The use of additives in salmon farming can harm the environment, and reducing their use can have economic benefits, such as reducing the cost of feed.

Tasmania's fisheries and aquaculture contributed $800 million to the economy in 2020-21, and reducing additive use can help maintain this economic value.

Strategies to minimize additive use include implementing IMTA systems, using microbubble oxygenation, and producing domestic feed.

These strategies can help maintain fish health and growth rates while reducing the environmental impact of salmon farming.

The use of additives in salmon farming is regulated by standards and regulations in countries such as Norway, Scotland, and China.

The Fish Feed and Additives market has key players like Aller Aqua AS and Biomar AS, which can help drive the development of more sustainable feed options.

Title:

Content: Fish Feed and Additives Market Analysis | Aller Aqua AS, Biomar AS, Biomin GmbH, Cargill Incorporated

[New York, November 2023] – Serving as a valuable resource for industry leaders and newcomers alike, a comprehensive market analysis report focusing on the Fish Feed and Additives Market was recently published. This comprehensive report offers a detailed review of the global Fish Feed and Additives market and its sub-segments, providing revenue forecasts and strategic insights that can drive business success in the coming years.

You can access a sample of this report here:https://www.statsndata.org/download-sample.php?id=172809

This report caters to a wide audience, from industry experts looking to learn about the dynamic Fish Feed and Additives market to newcomers seeking guidance. Customization options are available to ensure the report suits your specific needs.

Key industry players, including:

• Alltech Inc.
• Aller Aqua AS
• Biomar AS
• Biomin GmbH
• Cargill Incorporated
• Nutreco NV
• Ridley Corporation
• Archer Daniels Midland Co.
• BASF SE
• Nutriad International, are featured prominently in the report, shedding light on their business strategies, financial status, and upcoming products

In addition to answering these critical questions, the report provides insights into the future trajectory of the Fish Feed and Additives market by offering a forward-looking perspective. It provides decision makers with the information needed to effectively guide the development of the market over the forecast period.

Report Highlights:

– Competitive Landscape: In-depth analysis of evolving competitive dynamics for effective adaptation and strategy formulation.
– Future Outlook: Understand the forces driving or inhibiting Fish Feed and Additives market growth with a forward-looking, six-year forecast.
– Product Analytics: Identify key product segments and their growth potential to align your strategies with market trends.
– Informed Decision Making: Deepen your Fish Feed and Additives market understanding and segment analysis for well-informed business decisions.

Market segmentation is a crucial aspect, categorizing the market by type, product, and end-user. This segmentation enhances the accuracy of market descriptions.

Fish Feed and Additives Market Segmentation Analysis includes:

Fish Feed and Additives Market segmentation : By Type

• Sea Fish
• Freshwater Fish

Fish Feed and Additives Market Segmentation: By Application

• Feed
• Additive

Request Discount On Full Report:https://www.statsndata.org/checkout-report.php?id=172809

Key Questions Analyzed in this Report:

  • What will be the market size and growth rate over the forecast period?
  • What are the key factors driving the Fish Feed and Additives market?
  • What risks and challenges are on the horizon for the market?
  • Who are the major players in the Fish Feed and Additives market?
  • How are their market shares affected by current trends?
  • What are the key findings of Porter’s five forces model?
  • What global expansion opportunities await you in the Fish Feed and Additives market?

Conclusion

In conclusion, Embrace data-driven decision making with our comprehensive Fish Feed and Additives market research report. It is your roadmap for navigating the ever-changing market landscape and positioning your business for success.

Table Of Content

Chapter 1 Fish Feed and Additives Market Overview

1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Fish Feed and Additives

1.2 Fish Feed and Additives Market Segmentation by Type

1.3 Fish Feed and Additives Market Segmentation by Application

1.4 Fish Feed and Additives Market Segmentation by Regions

1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Fish Feed and Additives (2018-2029)

Chapter 2 Global Economic Impact on Fish Feed and Additives Industry

2.1 Global Macroeconomic Environment Analysis

2.2 Global Macroeconomic Environment Analysis by Regions

Chapter 3 Global Fish Feed and Additives Market Competition by Manufacturers

3.1 Global Fish Feed and Additives Production and Share by Manufacturers (2018 to 2023)

3.2 Global Fish Feed and Additives Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2018 to 2023)

3.3 Global Fish Feed and Additives Average Price by Manufacturers (2018 to 2023)

3.4 Manufacturers Fish Feed and Additives Manufacturing Base Distribution, Production Area and Product Type

3.5 Fish Feed and Additives Market Competitive Situation and Trends

Chapter 4 Global Fish Feed and Additives Production, Revenue (Value) by Region (2018-2023)

4.1 Global Fish Feed and Additives Production by Region (2018-2023)

4.2 Global Fish Feed and Additives Production Market Share by Region (2018-2023)

4.3 Global Fish Feed and Additives Revenue (Value) and Market Share by Region (2018-2023)

4.4 Global Fish Feed and Additives Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2018-2023)

Continue…

For customizations and specific requests, you can visit: https://www.statsndata.org/request-customization.php?id=172809

Contact Us

sales@statsndata.org

https://www.statsndata.org

Scroll to Top

The market size and growth rate of the Fish Feed and Additives market are analyzed over the forecast period, which can help identify trends and opportunities for reducing additive use.