Salmon farming feed often includes additives such as probiotics, prebiotics, essential oils, and acidifiers to help animals absorb and assimilate food into their bodies.

Lactic Acid Bacillus B4 is a probiotic used in salmon farming feed to improve fish growth and immunity.

Glucan is used as an emulsifier and thickener in food processing, and it can also be used as a prebiotic to increase probiotics in the body.

Sucrose promotes glucan production by lactic acid bacteria B4, which is beneficial for fish health.

Insect-based proteins, such as those from black soldier fly larvae, are being used as alternatives to traditional feed ingredients in salmon farming.

These insect-based proteins can replace fish-based feed and reduce the environmental impact of salmon farming.

Antibiotics are also used as additives in salmon farming feed to maintain healthy fish stock in aquaculture.

However, the use of non-heat-treated residues, such as waste from chicken slaughterhouses, can lead to the transfer of harmful bacteria like Salmonella and Escherichia coli.

Heat treatment is required for the safe use of these residues in salmon farming feed.

Soy proteins, wheat gluten, and corn gluten meal are common additives used in salmon farming feed.

Fishmeal and fish oil are also key ingredients in compound feeds for carnivorous fish, but they can be replaced with more sustainable alternatives like algae or farmed insects.

Vegetable oils are sometimes used as a substitute for fish oil in salmon farming feed, but they lack the fatty acids found in seafood.

The use of certain additives in salmon farming feed has raised health concerns, such as the presence of PCBs, which can increase the risk of cancer.

Farmed salmon may contain higher concentrations of harmful substances like PCBs, which can pose health risks to humans.

The market for feed additives is expected to reach $29.2 billion by 2028, with North America dominating the market in 2022 and Asia-Pacific expected to grow rapidly.

The use of additives in salmon farming feed is regulated by standards and regulations, but the specifics of these regulations are not well-documented in the available sources.

In some countries, such as those in the European Union, there are strict regulations governing the use of additives in salmon farming, including the use of antibiotics and other chemicals.

However, in other countries, the regulations may be less stringent, and the use of additives may be more widespread.

Farmed salmon can contain higher levels of contaminants, such as PCBs, than wild-caught salmon, which can pose health risks to humans who consume them.

The Omega-3 fatty acid content of farmed salmon can also vary depending on the type of feed used, with some feeds containing higher levels of vegetable oils and lower levels of Omega-3s.

Overall, the use of additives in salmon farming is a complex issue, with both benefits and drawbacks, and more research is needed to fully understand the impacts of these additives on the environment and human health.

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has ruled that mealworms are safe for human consumption, and they can be used as a replacement for fishmeal in salmon farming.

Insect-based ingredients have shown promise in supplementing fishmeal in salmon farming, with studies by NOAA demonstrating their potential.

The EU allows mealworms to be used as nutritional additives in pet and farm feeds, including salmon farming.

However, there are limited specific country regulations mentioned for salmon farming additives, with most countries having general regulations for aquaculture.

In Canada, fish farms are required to have a sea lice management plan, and the use of certain pesticides like SLICE is regulated.

Sea lice are becoming resistant to SLICE in Canada, prompting the search for alternative anti-parasite agents.

The Norwegian Aquaculture Act regulates salmon farming in Norway, but there are no specific regulations mentioned for additives.

The Aquaculture Stewardship Council sets standards for salmon farming, including requirements for feed and additives.

In China, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs implements a National Aquatic Products plan, which includes monitoring of veterinary drug residues in aquatic products.

China has a high pass rate for veterinary drug residue monitoring in aquatic products, with a rate of 99.2%.

Russia has veterinary rules for keeping fish in artificially created habitats, including requirements for feed distribution systems and waste removal.

Fish farms in Russia must provide water meeting quality standards for fishery significance, and disinfection of vehicles and equipment is required.

The use of feed-grade fish in aquaculture is being reduced in China, with a target to drop feed-grade fish catch to below 20% by 2020.

China is the world's biggest consumer of fishmeal, mostly used in aquaculture, and imports around 1.4 million tonnes of fishmeal annually.

Compound feed used in aquaculture in China contains animal and plant-based ingredients and added nutrients.

Antibiotic use in animals, including salmon farming, requires a veterinary prescription.

Regular veterinary visits promote best practices and reduce the need for antibiotics in salmon farming.

Preventive biosecurity measures are crucial for animal health in salmon farming, and antibiotic use is banned to compensate for poor hygiene or management.

Group treatment of animals is allowed through medicated feed or water in salmon farming, but the use of antibiotics is regulated.

Researchers are exploring alternatives to antibiotics, such as bacteriophages, which are viruses that can target and kill specific bacteria, to reduce antibiotic use in salmon farming.

Proteon Pharma is one company that uses bacteriophage technology to reduce antibiotic use in aquaculture, including salmon farming.

Bacteriophages are a new product in the Indian market and have been introduced to control Salmonella and E. coli in salmon farming.

The use of bacteriophages has been shown to be effective in reducing antibiotic use and promoting a healthier environment in salmon farming.

Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) is a method of farming that uses finned-fish, shellfish, and seaweeds together to benefit each other and reduce the need for antibiotics.

IMTA has been shown to reduce environmental effects and provide a sustainable source of fertilizer, and is being developed in countries such as Scotland, Ireland, and France.

Genetic research is also being conducted to identify disease-resistant genes in salmon, which could help reduce the need for antibiotics in salmon farming.

Gene editing is being used to produce disease-resistant salmon embryos, which could help reduce the need for antibiotics in salmon farming.

Selective breeding is also being used to increase salmon resistance to sea lice, but this is a slow process.

Alternative control strategies, such as feed supplements and clean fish, are being used to reduce the need for antibiotics in salmon farming.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has created a platform to help countries deal with antibiotic resistance, and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has developed an Action Plan to support the Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance.

The FAO works with the WHO and the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) to address antimicrobial resistance in salmon farming and other animal health issues.

Antibiotic resistance is a major concern in salmon farming, and countries are taking steps to reduce the use of antibiotics and promote more sustainable and healthy farming practices.

Sea lice are a major problem in salmon farming, and can harm or kill juvenile wild salmon, and the industry is spending millions of dollars to develop new technologies to control sea lice.

Canada requires fish farms to have a sea lice management plan, and farms are publicly reporting lice counts every month.

The use of specialized delousing boats is one method being used to remove sea lice from fish, and researchers are exploring new methods to control sea lice, including the use of genetic research to identify disease-resistant genes in salmon.

The Norwegian Aquaculture Act regulates salmon farming in Norway, and there are also certifications for humane and sustainable salmon farming from organizations such as the Aquaculture Stewardship Council, RSPCA, and A Greener World.

The Aquaculture Stewardship Council sets a standard for salmon farming, which includes requirements for the use of additives in feed.

The RSPCA sets welfare standards for farmed Atlantic salmon, which may include guidelines for the use of additives.

A Greener World certifies humane salmon farming, which may involve the use of certain additives or prohibitions on others.

The Marine Stewardship Council certifies sustainable salmon fishing, but it is not clear if this certification includes standards for additives used in feed.

There are no specific regulations mentioned for the use of additives in salmon farming in Canada and Chile.

Norway plans to boost salmon farming with research on mesopelagic fish and algae, which may involve the use of new additives in feed.

Compound feed use reduces fishmeal and fish oil in aquaculture, and fishmeal and fish oil are essential ingredients in compound feeds.

No global standards are mentioned for the use of additives in salmon farming, which may indicate a lack of regulation in this area.

The actual escapees of salmon from farms in Norway were two to four times higher than reported, and genetic introgression of escaped farmed salmon altered wild salmon life history, but it is not clear if additives played a role in this.

Salmon lice reduced salmon returns by 50,000 in Norway from 2010-2014, and salmon lice caused fewer salmon returns in subsequent years, but the relationship between additives and salmon l

Salmon farming feed often includes additives such as probiotics, prebiotics, essential oils, and acidifiers to help animals absorb and assimilate food into their bodies.

Title:

Content: Compound Harmless Feed Additive Market – Status and Development, Average Product Price and Market Shares of Key Players

Market Research Reports, Business Consulting Services & Analytics

The increase in the demand for and consumption of livestock-based products as well as the growth in animal feed production is anticipated to grow the market.

HYDERABAD, TELANGANA, INDIA, January 17, 2023 /EINPresswire.com/ -- IndustryARC, in its latest report, predicts that The Compound Harmless Feed Additive Market is estimated to reach $29.2 billion by 2028, growing at a CAGR of 5.1% over the forecast period 2023-2028. Feed additives are a diverse group of molecules, substances or living things that help animals take food, absorb it, assimilate it into their bodies, grow and stay healthy. They have an impact on physiological processes like reproduction, stress resistance and immune system performance. Feed additives can be immune stimulants, probiotics, prebiotics, essential oils, acidifiers or others. The anticipated rise in demand for feed additives as a consequence of the growing demand for animal feed is one of the major factors driving the market for compound harmless feed additives during the forecast period of 2023–2028. According to European Feed Manufacturers' Federation, farm animals in the EU27 consumed an estimated 701 million tonnes of feed in 2021, of which about 22 % are produced by Compound Feed manufacturers.

Click here to browse the complete report summary:
https://www.industryarc.com/Research/Global-Compound-Harmless-Feed-Additive-Industry-Market-Research-511853

Save more @ IndustryARC,
Use the code “FLAT1000” & get FLAT 1000$ OFF on any Market Report
Offer available for limited period only..!!

Key takeaways:

This IndustryARC report on the Compound Harmless Feed Additive Market highlights the following areas -

1. Geographically, North America dominated the Compound Harmless Feed Additive market in 2022, owing to the rising livestock production in Mexico and the United States. Asia-Pacific is anticipated to be the fastest growing market during the forecast period 2023-2028, owing to the heavy demand for natural poultry feed additives augmented by the consumption of processed poultry in countries such as China, India and Australia.

2. The increase in the demand for and consumption of livestock-based products as well as the growth in animal feed production is anticipated to grow over the forecast period of 2023–2028.

3. The standardization of meat products as a result of disease outbreaks and the implementation of innovative animal husbandry practices to improve meat quality are projected to drive the market.

4. A detailed analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats would be provided in the Compound Harmless Feed Additive Market Report.

Interested in knowing more relevant information? Click here:
https://www.industryarc.com/pdfdownload.php?id=511853

Segmental Analysis:

Compound Harmless Feed Additive Market Segment Analysis – by Additive Type : Based on additive type, the Compound Harmless Feed Additive market is further segmented into antibiotics, vitamins, antioxidants, amino acids, enzymes, mycotoxin detoxifiers, prebiotics, probiotics, flavors and sweeteners, pigments, binder acidifiers and minerals.

Compound Harmless Feed Additive Market Segment Analysis – by Livestock : Based on livestock, the Compound Harmless Feed Additive market is further segmented into pork and swine, poultry, cattle, aquaculture and others. The poultry segment held the largest revenue market share in 2022, owing to the rise in demand for natural poultry feed additives and poultry-based items including meat and eggs.

Compound Harmless Feed Additive Market Segment Analysis – by Geography : Based on geography, the North American Compound Harmless Feed Additive market accounted for 36% of revenue share in 2022, due to the rising demand and consumption of meat in the region.

Competitive Landscape:

The top 5 players in the Compound Harmless Feed Additive Industry are -

1. BASF SE
2. Koninklijke DSM N.V.
3. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
4. Bluestar Adisseo
5. DeKalb Feeds Inc.

Click on the following link to buy the Compound Harmless Feed Additive Market Report:
https://www.industryarc.com/reports/request-quote?id=511853

Why Choose IndustryARC?

IndustryARC is one of the leading market research and consulting firms in the world. It produces over 500 unique market reports annually. If you are looking for a detailed overview of a particular market, you can simply connect with the team at IndustryARC. You can not only buy your preferred market report from the website, but also get personalized assistance on specific reports.

Related Reports:

A. Cattle Feed Market
https://www.industryarc.com/Report/15063/cattle-feed-market.html

B. Animal Probiotics Market
https://www.industryarc.com/Report/18555/animal-probiotics-market.html

Contact Us:

Mr. Venkat Reddy
IndustryARC
Email: venkat@industryarc.com, sales@industryarc.com
USA: (+1) 970-236-3677, (+1) 815-656-4596
IND: (+91) 40-485-49062

Venkat Reddy
IndustryARC
+1 614-588-8538
venkat@industryarc.com
Visit us on social media:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Lactic Acid Bacillus B4 is a probiotic used in salmon farming feed to improve fish growth and immunity.

Title:

Content: Yogurt is amazing! Feeding Wu Guo to eat for 2 months, the fisherman smiles and wears a helmet: anti-collision
▲ The water laboratory said that in recent years, due to climate change, the unusually high temperature in the summer, it is easy to cause the fish to be attacked by germs. (Photo by reporter Yang Chih-hing)
Journalist Hsu Chien-yi / reporting from Taipei
In recent years, the unusually high temperature in summer has led to the outbreak of germs, which has caused great losses to farmers. The probiotic Lactic Acid Bacillus B4, which helps to improve fish growth and enhance their immunity, and its glucan product Lactic Acid Bacillus B4 functional yogurt was added to the feed. Farming time to reduce the risk of breeding.
The water laboratory pointed out that glucan can be used as an emulsifier and thickener flavor carrier in food processing. In terms of health care, research shows that glucan can be used as a prebiotic to increase the number of probiotics - bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria in the body, and regulate immunity.
As mentioned in the water test, lactic acid bacteria B4, previously screened from the gut of perch fish, is a probiotic with special enzymes. Adding cheap sucrose can promote the production of glucan by lactic acid bacteria B4, and developed functional yogurt and ice cream containing glucan with lactic acid bacteria B4.
[Advertisement] Please continue reading...
According to the water test, the literature points out that probiotics or prebiotics such as glycans and oligosaccharides as feed additives can effectively improve the growth and immunity of fish and shrimp. The combined use of probiotics and prebiotics is usually higher than the combined effect of the two alone. Probiotics that produce pathogens can also produce glucans themselves, so the lactobacillus B4 yogurt is applied to aquaculture.
Experimental studies show that the addition of lactic acid bacteria B4 yogurt in the feed helps to improve the growth and resistance to pathogens.
▲ The feed in the test tank is evenly mixed with lactic acid bacteria B4 yogurt and the feed by an electric mixer.
(Photo / Supplied by Aquatic Research Institute)
In recent years, due to climate change, the unusually high temperature in summer can easily lead to the outbreak of germs, causing the death of fish and loss of farmers. Three years ago, the Kaohsiung City Animal Protection Department sought technical assistance from the water laboratory. 4 Yogurt feed for 2 months, fish feeding conditions are better than the control pond, growth is very fast, at the end of May harvest, no disease, fish average weight 570 grams, strong and healthy.
When the fish are harvested, the fisherman must wear a safety helmet to avoid being injured by the energetic Wu Kuo. The fish in the control pond eat worse than the test pond and grow more slowly. In mid-June, the fish suffered from streptococcus disease. It must be treated with drugs. The average weight is 467 grams, which is much lower than the average. Test pool.
The water laboratory further stressed that in order to understand whether the feed containing lactic acid bacteria B4 yogurt can really survive the cool summer, and the Kaohsiung Municipal Bureau of Animal Protection specially arranged the test in the summer the previous year. The results showed that although the test group and the control group of the fish containing lactic acid bacteria B4 yogurt were all suffering from streptococcal disease, the test group were milder drug. The treatment only takes 3 days to heal, and the control group is more serious, requiring more than 7 days of drug treatment.
Therefore, the addition of lactic acid bacteria B4 yogurt in broccoli feed helps to improve the growth and health of the fish, shortens the breeding time, reduces the breeding risk and slows the severity of the disease, and the cost of adding lactic acid bacteria B4 yogurt per kilogram of feed is only about 0.5 yuan.
Share with friends:
※ This article is copyrighted and cannot be reproduced without permission. [ETtoday Copyright Notice]
Related News
Hot News
The best video
And more.
Hot News
Back to the top.

Glucan is used as an emulsifier and thickener in food processing, and it can also be used as a prebiotic to increase probiotics in the body.

Sucrose promotes glucan production by lactic acid bacteria B4, which is beneficial for fish health.

Insect-based proteins, such as those from black soldier fly larvae, are being used as alternatives to traditional feed ingredients in salmon farming.

Title:

Content: Insects food farmed fish in France
Insects food farmed fish in France
RITEL, France – A plant in the French region of Ardennes is breeding a black soldier fly, which converts agricultural waste into proteins used to feed pets, especially farmed fish, in a market that is booming worldwide due to rapidly increasing demand.
Rafael Semia, director of the Agronotris plant in Ritel, which will release its first batch of insect flour this summer and aims to produce 5,000 tonnes of it in 2024, explains that “the growth of aquaculture is phenomenal, which means we need raw materials to feed these breeding farms. ”
Last week, the company announced the construction of a second plant at Ritel, which will begin next year, to convert “more than 280,000 tonnes ” of organic waste into“ 30,000 tonnes of flour, ” without specifying at what date or amount of investment.
There is no interest in feeding fish with fish that can be eaten directly by humans or with soybeans that are widely imported.
Under recent changes to European rules, more than 5 percent of fish consumed in the EU could come from farms using insect-based proteins by 2030, according to estimates by the pro-insect flour lobby group in Brussels.
Existing farmed fish diets are made partly from wild fish.
International NGOs have for years denounced this contradiction, which they blame for overfishing, with dire consequences for ecosystems, the marine food chain and the livelihoods of local populations.
Therefore, the insect meal represents an alternative being developed in France from three players that are now in the manufacturing stage: Insect, Innovavid and Agronotrice, which raised 100 million euros in 2021 and finally signed a contract worth “tens of millions of euros ” with Biomar.
This Danish company, a world leader in the manufacture of farmed fish feed and salmon in particular, has decided to invest in this project.
“There is no interest in feeding fish with fish that can be eaten directly by humans ” or with soybeans, which are widely imported and whose intensive farming contributes to the expansion of deforestation, says Biumar ’ s marketing director Catherine Briar.
In Ritel, inside a transparent container, there are like thousands of semolina seeds.
Cedric Oriol, co-founder of Agronotris, says, “These larvae have just hatched.
Today, it weighs 15 micrograms, and this weight will double ten thousand times in just two weeks.
So 100 grams of larvae will become a ton of larvae in two weeks. ”
The rapid growth of black soldier fly larvae is one of the reasons the company chose this non-invasive species known as the composting queen.
French factories raise black soldier flies that convert agricultural waste into proteins used to feed animals and fish
This choice, along with the dough recipe or optimal conditions for the marketing of the production, has been the subject of 12 years of research at a laboratory in Toulouse, according to the company.
After two weeks of growth, 98 percent of the larvae are crushed to make proteins, while 2 percent are kept for use in reproduction.
Inside one of the cages, where adult flies move, Antoine Riebois, wearing a hat covered with insects, explains that “the main activity here is to lay eggs, and the goal is to recover as many eggs as possible. ”
The black soldier fly can lay between 600 and 1,000 eggs in its short two-week life.
Another use associated with fly breeding is a mixture of insect droppings known as feras, which is an excellent fertilizer for agriculture.
The company aims to produce about 16,000 tons quickly.
The use of this waste to manufacture human food is not expected any time soon.
Rafael Semia, director of the plant, said: “It will take time, but tomorrow the actors in the insect branch will be at the forefront of human food processing. ”
arabic

These insect-based proteins can replace fish-based feed and reduce the environmental impact of salmon farming.

Antibiotics are also used as additives in salmon farming feed to maintain healthy fish stock in aquaculture.

Title:

Content:
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

trusted source

proofread

Anticipating obsolescence: The next step to enhancing the sustainability of aquaculture

With growing concerns about the environmental toll of single species fish farms, a research project has been looking at the feasibility of introducing a more sustainable and potentially more profitable method of fish farming, using three complementary species.

Much as native American people planted squash, maize and climbing beans together to benefit each other, (often called the "three sisters"), farming finned-fish, shellfish and seaweeds together could benefit each other and reduce any environmental effects of fish farming. Small scale integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA), as the system is called, has traditionally been used at a small domestic scale in Asia, providing the farmer with more than one product to sell or use.

The feasibility study conducted by Bangor University and published in Ecological Modelling has identified the locations around the Atlantic coast which would be most suitable for IMTA, based on farming salmon, and Oarweed, a type of kelp seaweed commonly found in temperate Atlantic coasts. The research considered the natural distribution of the three species, whether suitable locations clashed with busy shipping lanes or marine protected areas and whether there was close access to sizeable ports in order to reach markets.

The western coast of Lewis in the Outer Hebrides, Scotland; Lough Swilly in County Donegal, Ireland, and the western coast of Brittany, northwest France were found to be the best locations to further develop IMTA based aquaculture.

As Conchúr Hughes of Bangor University's School of Ocean Sciences explained, "One of the problems with the type of single species aquaculture practiced in Europe is that excess food and feces can lead to deterioration of local ecology, while density can mean that aquaculture companies need to use antibiotics and other additives to maintain a healthy fish-stock.

"Mussels are filter feeders, they can be responsible for removing up to 54% of salmon waste materials from the , using it as energy to grow, while the oarweed removes soluble nutrients from the water column. Oarweed can then be farmed to use in a variety of products, from food supplements for human consumption or for fish farms, as a fertilizer or as an ingredient in pharmaceuticals.

"Each of these species complements the other and mitigates against problems."

IMTA-based aquaculture

Both salmon and mussels are important food sources in Europe, and while oarweed is not as yet, this is a sector that is expected to experience a rapid increase in demand in the coming years- and can provide an alternative sustainable source of fertilizer and other products.

Seaweed cultivation can also provide environmental benefits. The seaweed in the water acts as a buffer against as it approaches the shore, reducing the energy as it passes through the seaweed, much as trees act as a buffer against strong winds, which can help reduce erosion. It also elevates the pH and oxygenates the water.

More information: Conchúr Hughes et al, Habitat suitability modelling for an integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) system along Europe's Atlantic coast, Ecological Modelling (2023). DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110459

Provided by Bangor University

Citation: Anticipating obsolescence: The next step to enhancing the sustainability of aquaculture (2023, September 27) retrieved 27 September 2023 from https://phys.org/news/2023-09-obsolescence-sustainability-aquaculture.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

How the humble sea cucumber could transform fish farming

0 shares

Feedback to editors

However, the use of non-heat-treated residues, such as waste from chicken slaughterhouses, can lead to the transfer of harmful bacteria like Salmonella and Escherichia coli.

Title:

Content: Detecting 6 fish pores in Hama that feed its fish with waste that leads to carcinogenic diseases
13-04-2023
Detecting 6 fish pores in Hama that feed its fish with waste that leads to carcinogenic diseases
The Director of Internal Trade and Consumer Protection in Hama Riad Zeyoud revealed the seizure of 6 fish feeds farmed fish harmful to humans when eating them.
Zeyoud explained that three fish were seized in the Kazuo Valley, providing the fish of breeding with non-heat-treated residues, which may transfer the spores of Salmonella and Escherichia coli, which cause various diseases and health problems to humans when eaten by the consumer who buys and feeds those fish.
In the same context, the head of the Consumer Protection Department in Hama, Dr. Jaafar Al-Safaf, pointed out that a fourth fish was seized in the same area in violation of feeding the fish, the waste of chicken slaughterhouses that are not heat-treated, pointing out that these fish were not confiscated because they could not be transported and are in the process of growth.
Al-Safaf also pointed out in the same context that the seizure of the Shorouk fish in the Kazuo Valley was also in violation of feeding the waste of the chicken slaughterhouses without heat treatment, with the amount of one and a half tons of catfish, and the owner was fined a total value of 12 million Syrian pounds, in addition to organizing the seizure of Aboud fish in the same area and the type of the violation. Syrian pound.
After communicating with the veterinarian Bilal Ismail, he pointed out that the food mentioned (the waste of broiler slaughterhouses) provided to fish is for obtaining animal protein, which works to increase the food conversion within a short period, but when resorting to this method must be subjected to microbial and viral surveillance, without which may lead to common diseases between fish and consumers (chronic or carcinogenic diseases).
He added that these residues, if their bacterial virulence is large, may lead to the occurrence of the breeder in large economic losses on the one hand, and on the other hand will be a health disaster transmitted to human consumers even if the disease is controlled through the use of antibiotics after trespassing with waste, and known fish that are given these residues by their meat and feeling unpalatable to human consumption.
Trace.

Heat treatment is required for the safe use of these residues in salmon farming feed.

Soy proteins, wheat gluten, and corn gluten meal are common additives used in salmon farming feed.

Title:

Content: 262
Views

China Works to Get Wild-Caught Fish Out of its Aquaculture Feed

[By Zhang Chun]

A 2021 Chinese government initiative to stop aquaculture feed being made from only young or low-value fish and to instead start producing “compound feed” – mixed with ingredients harvested from the land – is opening up a greener future for the sector.

According to the Ministry of Agriculture, in a series of trials last year, the sole use of low-value “feed-grade” fish as aquaculture feed was reduced by 77 percent, and by as much as 94 percent in farming of largemouth bass. Experts say the switch to compound feed could see overall use of feed-grade fish slashed by half for farming of certain species.

What is compound feed?

Compound feed normally contains a mixture of animal- and plant-based ingredients, and added nutrients such as vitamins. For aquaculture feeds containing fishmeal and fish oil, common additives include soy proteins, wheat gluten and corn gluten meal.

Feed-grade fish are those in a catch that are small, low in commercial value, or unsuitable for human consumption. They are sent to be processed into fishmeal and fish oil, or fed directly to farmed fish. But a significant proportion of feed-grade fish consists of juveniles of commercially important species. Once caught they can no longer grow into adult fish and breed, or be caught and sold on the market. Their removal damages ocean food chains and ecosystem stability.

The last decade and more has seen increased calls for China to tackle the use of feed-grade fish in aquaculture, but the current round of trials is the first organised by the Ministry of Agriculture. It focuses on species such as the yellow croaker, Japanese sea bass and largemouth bass, which tend to be fed more feed-grade fish. While those species don’t account for much of China’s fed aquaculture output, they do require much more protein than others to put on the same amount of weight. Compound feed cuts down on the use of fish by substituting vegetable alternatives, and is cheaper.

In the long term, sustained reductions in the use of fishmeal and fish oil in feed will be necessary to protect wild fisheries.

Aquaculture driving feed-grade fish catch

Fishers never used to set out to catch feed-grade fish; it was bycatch, with no economic value. Then in the 1980s, global aquaculture took off. “There was a lot of need for fishmeal and oil,” Rashid Sumalia, a fisheries researcher at the University of British Columbia, told China Dialogue. People started going out “purposely to catch them at distance, because there was a market”, he added.

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization’s (FAO’s) 2020 global fisheries and aquaculture report, the use of fish for reduction to fishmeal and fish oil peaked in 1994 at 30 million tonnes, and stood at 18 million tonnes by 2018. Another 4 million tonnes were used elsewhere, including directly in feed for aquaculture, livestock and fur animals.

It wasn’t until the mid and late 1990s that aquaculture took off in China. The FAO’s 1998 fisheries and aquaculture report describes how rare it was for fish catches in Asia to go unused or be used as aquaculture feed. But in Asia, particularly in China and Vietnam, aquaculture has expanded rapidly and the region now accounts for almost 90 percent of global output. In China, output tripled between 1998 and 2020, to represent 60 percent of the global total.

Although many of the species farmed in China need little or no feed, fed fish and crustacean aquaculture accounts for half of output and requires millions of tonnes of feed-grade fish from Chinese waters alone. China does not currently have statistics on its feed-grade fish catch or use in fed aquaculture. One study calculated that in 2016 4.6 million tonnes of feed-grade fish were caught, 35 percent of the total recorded catch in China’s waters, and most was used directly as feed.

“The state is certainly aware of the problem,” said Fang Qing, China general manager for the Aquaculture Stewardship Council, adding that the difficulty in banning some harmful types of fishing gear in China is due to the ongoing market for the feed-grade fish it brings in. Since 2018, China has put minimum size limits in place for 15 commercial fish species, and ruled that feed-grade fish catch would drop to below 20% by 2020. There is no data available indicating whether this target was met.

This it isn’t just a Chinese problem. According to a 2017 study by the University of British Columbia, many countries, including the US and Norway, use feed-grade fish directly as feed. But the practice increased significantly in Asia between the 1990s and 2010, with feed-grade fish coming to account for a high percentage of landed catches.

Replacing feed-grade fish

In early 2019, the Ministry of Agriculture announced it would work to make Chinese aquaculture more environmentally friendly, and proposed the use of compound feed instead of purely fish-based feed. In April 2021, several provinces started trials of compound feed as part of more concrete action plans.

Compound feed for aquaculture is usually a mix of fishmeal, fish oil, wheat flour, soybean meal, vegetable oil and other land-grown ingredients. The amount of fishmeal and fish oil needed depends on the type of fish to be fed, and its stage of growth. According to Fang Qing, carnivorous fish such as the yellow croaker need huge quantities of meat protein at certain stages in their growth, and the relationship between particular nutrients and the growth and physiology of the fish can be complex. Hence, producing appropriate compound feed involves a lot of research and development.

To quantify how efficiently a species is farmed, the aquaculture industry uses a ratio called Fish in:Fish out (FIFO). The closer the FIFO is to 1, the more fish meat is produced per unit of input; a score of 1 means an extra kilogram of fish used as feed results in an extra kilogram of fish to harvest.

A study published in 2020 shows a FIFO of almost 1 for salmon and trout, thanks to the use of compound feeds which require less fishmeal and fish oil. If only fish were used to feed those species, the FIFO figure would be similar to that of the yellow croaker – over 6, according to an upcoming paper co-authored by Zhang Wenbo, an assistant professor in the College of Fisheries and Life Science at Shanghai Ocean University. His research into conventional yellow croaker aquaculture in China found that the direct use of feed-grade fish is still the best option for the yellow croaker farmers. But Fang Qing told China Dialogue that a lot of feed-grade fish fed to yellow croaker goes uneaten, and ends up sinking to the seabed or rotting, causing pollution and increasing the risk of disease.

More compound feed use would help reduce FIFO numbers in two ways: by cutting use of feed-grade fish, and by increasing conversion ratios – that is, generating more fish growth per unit of feed.

Zhejiang is taking the lead in both those areas. Since 2016, the province has been shutting fishmeal factories during the closed season and restricting the percentage of feed-grade fish in the overall catch. This, combined with the use of compound feed, saw Zhejiang cut the use of feed-grade fish by 835,000 tonnes across 710,000 mu (474 square kilometres) of aquaculture farms during the 13th FYP period (2016-2020). “Previously, feed-grade fish were the primary feed for largemouth bass in Zhejiang. These last two years that’s almost all been replaced with compound feed.” The FIFO ratio for farmed largemouth bass in Zhejiang could come down to 1.5, half the national average for this species, according to 2016 calculations Zhang Wenbo contributed to.

But cutting back on feed-grade fish use in China won’t be easy. Fishers catch a wide range of fish with a wide range of gear. At the local level there is a lack of fisher associations that can impose rules on the sector, making management tricky. Zhejiang’s success can be ascribed to strong local regulations. “There are no successful [international] examples that China can apply,” said Fang Qing. Alongside legislation to bolster oversight of the feed-grade fish catch, he also suggests developing feeds which will be more palatable to fish, and labelling products according to their use of feed-grade fish or compound feed, so consumers can make an informed choice.

Increasing the efficiency of fish inputs

The use of compound feed isn’t the end of the story. At least for now, fishmeal and fish oil are essential ingredients in those feeds. And while the global supply of fishmeal and fish oil has fallen from its peak in 2000 to a fairly stable level, the demand for aquaculture feeds has been increasing. That requires the development of feeds containing less meal and oil.

Plans announced by Norway to boost salmon farming have led to concerns about the supply of fishmeal and fish oil as well as vegetable ingredients. The country has started researching the use of mesopelagic fish (which inhabit the middle depths of the ocean), algae and farmed insects to meet that need and make feed more efficient. A more complete solution would be to develop entirely vegetarian feeds, with no fishmeal at all. However, as things stand that would only be suitable for a few species.

“Fishmeal is the most expensive of the ingredients found in bulk feeds. Reducing the amount in those feeds is the best way to make them cheaper,” Zhang Wenbo points out. A tonne of fishmeal costs around 10,000 yuan (US$1,500), compared to 1,000–4,000 yuan for bran or soybean meal, he added. “Feed conversion ratios are also affected by the type of aquaculture, the make-up of the feed, and genetic selection – the breeding of strains more suited to compound feeds,” he said. This is more difficult in China, with its wide range of farmed species, than in Norway, where salmon dominates. But progress is still being made, and associated targets have been set in the 14th Five Year Plan (2021–25).

Increasing the efficiency of fishmeal and fish oil use in China will also ease global pressures on the supply and help protect juvenile fish. China is the world’s biggest consumer of fishmeal, with the largest part being used in aquaculture, and the second largest being fed to pigs. But the country only produces 400,000–700,000 tonnes of fishmeal a year – not even close to meeting domestic demand. Fishmeal imports have held steady since 2017, at about 1.4 million tonnes, but jumped to 1.82 million tonnes in 2021, with experts ascribing the change to the recovery in pig farming. The extra fishmeal came from the Americas and elsewhere in Asia.

Zhang Wenbo explains that China’s fishmeal and fish oil imports come from forage fish, caught specifically to be turned into fishmeal, and Peru is the main supplier. Relatively little of China’s fishmeal is made from feed-grade fish. “Imports of by-product processed fishmeal from Vietnam and Thailand have been increasing in recent years,” he said.

Minimizing the feed-grade fish catch

Cutting back on the use of feed-grade fish is good for the sustainable development of both wild fishing and aquaculture. It will also help protect already vulnerable ocean ecosystems. In 1959, fishing vessels in China’s Bohai Sea caught 420 kg of fish per net for every hour they worked. By 1993, that had fallen to 30 kg, and only 8 kg between 1998 and 2011. The above-mentioned research into China’s feed-grade fish catch found that a long-term stable total catch has masked trends including falling biomass and changes in end use.

The losses to biodiversity and ecological services cannot be measured in financial terms, and the fishing industry needs more than simply output. Wang Songlin, president and founder of the Qingdao Marine Conservation Society, believes the industry needs to work towards a balance of ecological, economic and social benefits. He told China Dialogue that even if total catch may still be the same by volume, the underlying destruction to the integrity of ecosystems and the environment should not be ignored.

Management of the sector in China has acquired a new ecological focus. Alongside the use of compound feeds, some provinces are providing fishery stewardship subsidies for the protection of rare and endangered species and for keeping down feed-grade fish catch volumes.

Protecting juvenile fish isn’t just a matter for China – it’s crucial for ocean ecosystems around the world. Rashid Sumalia said: “If you look at the economies and the ecology at the higher level, you don’t want to [catch feed-grade fish] because the losses are too high” to be sustainable. Sumalia acknowledges that many people rely on that fishing for their livelihoods but says: “We need to take it down as far as we can.”

Zhang Chun is a senior researcher at China Dialogue. This article appears courtesy of China Dialogue Ocean and may be found in its original form here

The opinions expressed herein are the author's and not necessarily those of The Maritime Executive.

Fishmeal and fish oil are also key ingredients in compound feeds for carnivorous fish, but they can be replaced with more sustainable alternatives like algae or farmed insects.

Vegetable oils are sometimes used as a substitute for fish oil in salmon farming feed, but they lack the fatty acids found in seafood.

Title:

Content: Cheaper salmon is 'as good as premium farmed products when it comes to Omega 3', study shows

  • Fish-eaters benefit from two Omega 3 fatty acids – EPA and DHA – which can boost heart health and thinking skills
  • Researchers analysed packs of farmed Scottish and Norwegian salmon from 10 UK supermarkets
  • The best provided 67% of the recommended weekly Omega 3 but the worst only offered 26%
  • Fillets from two stores did not contain significantly more Omega 3 than non-premium products

Premium farmed salmon may be no healthier than value brands when it comes to Omega 3, a study has shown.

Fish-eaters benefit from two Omega 3 fatty acids – EPA and DHA – which can boost heart health and thinking skills.

Researchers analysed packs of farmed Scottish and Norwegian salmon from 10 UK supermarkets.

The best provided 67 per cent of the recommended weekly Omega 3 but the worst only offered 26 per cent.

Fillets from two stores did not contain significantly more Omega 3 than non-premium products.

Premium farmed salmon may be no healthier than value brands when it comes to Omega 3, a study has shown. Fish-eaters benefit from two Omega 3 fatty acids – EPA and DHA – which can boost heart health and thinking skills. (File image)

Farmed salmon tend to be fed a mixture of fish and vegetable oils but the latter lack the fatty acids found in seafood.

Study leader Dr Matthew Sprague, from Stirling University, said: 'The amount of EPA and DHA can vary based on the cut of salmon, as well as what it was fed, but farmed salmon is still high in nutrients.'

Salmon not only contains Omega 3 but selenium and phosphorus, which are also important for health.

Andrew Opie, director of food and sustainability at the British Retail Consortium, said: 'Consumers take various factors into consideration when buying salmon, including its health benefits and the way it is produced, and they will weigh these up when choosing what to purchase in a supermarket.'

Salmon not only contains Omega 3 but selenium and phosphorus, which are also important for health

Phil Brooke, from Compassion in World Farming, said: 'Intensive fish farming is bad for fish welfare and the product only contains Omega 3 due to the wasteful consumption of feed containing fish oil.'

Wild salmon consume only fish oil, which they get from algae and smaller fish, but lose fatty acids from that fish oil, as they become leaner during the migration back from the sea to the river to spawn.

This means farmed fish, which are kept confined in cages within the sea, can contain more Omega 3 than the wild variety.

But vegetable oil is more accessible, sustainable, and also cheaper than fish oil for the expanding fish farming industry.

So more of this can be used, which substantially reduces the amount of Omega 3 in farmed salmon.

Advertisement

Cheaper salmon is 'as good as premium farmed products when it comes to Omega 3', study shows

No comments have so far been submitted. Why not be the first to send us your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The use of certain additives in salmon farming feed has raised health concerns, such as the presence of PCBs, which can increase the risk of cancer.

Title:

Content: Miscellaneous
Publish Date: December 13, 2021 8: 47 GMT
Updated on: December 13, 2021 9: 40 GMT
Study: Eating Too Much ‘ Farm Salmon ’ May Cause Cancer
A medical study published on Monday warned that overeating salmon raised in farm ponds could lead to cancer.
The Daily Newspaper noted.
+ A -A
Source: Erm News
A medical study published on Monday warned that overeating salmon raised in farm ponds could lead to cancer.
The Daily Express newspaper pointed out that "some previous studies found that salmon, jam in ponds, which is widely consumed around the world, doubles the risk of prostate cancer," pointing out that "salmon is a useful food source for health because it contains omega-3 fatty acids."
"While one salmon is caught in open water, like the seas, the other is bred in tight spaces (farms and ponds), which could have implications for human health," the paper said.
Studies have found that PCBs in farm-raised salmon were about 8 times higher than concentrations in wild salmon, adding that PCBs have been banned for commercial use for decades, but their effects can still be found in the environment, which may adversely affect human diet and therefore health.
According to a study by the Environmental Defense Fund, eating salmon raised in farm ponds on a regular basis may increase the risk of cancer after multiple cases of contamination have been detected in the United States and other countries.
"Medical scientific findings, published in the Journal of Medical Sciences, suggest that cheap farmed salmon sold in stores may do more harm than good."
“Risk analysis suggests that consumption of farmed Atlantic salmon may pose health risks that detract from the beneficial effects of fish consumption, ” the study said.
Eating farmed salmon more than once a month may be enough to increase the risk of cancer.
"In multivariate analyses, men with the highest concentrations of PCBs were twice as likely to develop prostate cancer than men with the lowest concentrations."
Download Erm News app on your phone

What health concerns are there specifically related to additives in farmed salmon feed?

Farmed salmon may contain higher concentrations of harmful substances like PCBs, which can pose health risks to humans.

Title:

Content: Miscellaneous
Publish Date: December 13, 2021 8: 47 GMT
Updated on: December 13, 2021 9: 40 GMT
Study: Eating Too Much ‘ Farm Salmon ’ May Cause Cancer
A medical study published on Monday warned that overeating salmon raised in farm ponds could lead to cancer.
The Daily Newspaper noted.
+ A -A
Source: Erm News
A medical study published on Monday warned that overeating salmon raised in farm ponds could lead to cancer.
The Daily Express newspaper pointed out that "some previous studies found that salmon, jam in ponds, which is widely consumed around the world, doubles the risk of prostate cancer," pointing out that "salmon is a useful food source for health because it contains omega-3 fatty acids."
"While one salmon is caught in open water, like the seas, the other is bred in tight spaces (farms and ponds), which could have implications for human health," the paper said.
Studies have found that PCBs in farm-raised salmon were about 8 times higher than concentrations in wild salmon, adding that PCBs have been banned for commercial use for decades, but their effects can still be found in the environment, which may adversely affect human diet and therefore health.
According to a study by the Environmental Defense Fund, eating salmon raised in farm ponds on a regular basis may increase the risk of cancer after multiple cases of contamination have been detected in the United States and other countries.
"Medical scientific findings, published in the Journal of Medical Sciences, suggest that cheap farmed salmon sold in stores may do more harm than good."
“Risk analysis suggests that consumption of farmed Atlantic salmon may pose health risks that detract from the beneficial effects of fish consumption, ” the study said.
Eating farmed salmon more than once a month may be enough to increase the risk of cancer.
"In multivariate analyses, men with the highest concentrations of PCBs were twice as likely to develop prostate cancer than men with the lowest concentrations."
Download Erm News app on your phone

What health concerns are there specifically related to additives in farmed salmon feed?

The market for feed additives is expected to reach $29.2 billion by 2028, with North America dominating the market in 2022 and Asia-Pacific expected to grow rapidly.

The use of additives in salmon farming feed is regulated by standards and regulations, but the specifics of these regulations are not well-documented in the available sources.

In some countries, such as those in the European Union, there are strict regulations governing the use of additives in salmon farming, including the use of antibiotics and other chemicals.

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning antibiotics in farmes salmon?

What has the release of Netflix's ecological crisis documentary "Seaspiracy"  exposed?

The pollution risks associated with antibiotics used in sea-farmed salmon.

What health concerns are there specifically related to additives in farmed salmon feed?

However, in other countries, the regulations may be less stringent, and the use of additives may be more widespread.

Title:

Content: Alert
The first wave of large-scale private school exits has hit the "Carpentry School" with more directors and supervisors.
More than 70% of the mortgage can be borrowed from the central bank.
Remember to bring an umbrella after work! 11 counties and cities rain special report to fear the road to night
More than 300 people change their name to eat enough … your favorite salmon is abused and pollutes the sea? Netflix "Ocean Conspiracy" exposed to the black screen
In the past, more than 300 people in Taiwan changed their name after turning around the famous sushi restaurant “Sushi Lang ” to launch the“ Free Salmon to Eat ” campaign, setting off a “salmon chaos ” in society, showing the people ’ s love for salmon.
With Netflix ’ s new ecological crisis documentary “Seaspiracy ”, which exposes the problems of antibiotics released by“ sea captive salmon ” and fears of pollution, as well as millions of salmon crammed in underwater cages, mercilessly attacked by fish lice, and violating the nature of wild migration, people can ’ t help but look at the issue of animal persecution. It has been proven to sense pain.
What are the cruelties hidden in the world-famous seafood “farmed salmon ”?
How can fish welfare be improved?
More than 300 people changed their name to "salmon" to eat! The salmon that Taiwanese love to eat is not wild at all.
As with many livestock farms on the land, salmon is of high economic value, so many aquaculture operators around the world use sea box nets to trap and breed salmon in captivity, and regularly feed them to pipelines in order to obtain huge "salmon gold" business opportunities.
If you look at Taiwan from a perspective, according to the statistics of customs imports and exports in 2020, the weight of locally imported “captive salmon ” alone is as high as 18,000 tons, with a total value of about NT $5.15 billion.
On the other hand, even if the world is hit by the epidemic in 2020, Norway, the world ’ s largest exporter of salmon, not only will the production of salmon still reach 1.1 million tons, but the export volume will also reach a record second high.
But with the release of Netflix ’ s new marine crisis documentary “Seaspiracy ” in 2023, the blood-soaked disclosure of the sea farming salmon behind the following three unknown dark sides, finally let the terrible“ salmon hell ” shake the world.
1.
High-density farmed salmon have nowhere to escape! Scales and fins are mercilessly devoured by sea lice parasites
Compared to free wild salmon, captive salmon are likely to be crowded together by the fish, constantly colliding, friction, conflict, and nowhere to hide, resulting in scales, kisses, and fins are broken, infectious anemia, spinal deformities and other symptoms, and are more likely to be parasitized by sea lice.
For example, a survey by the global animal lobby welfare organization Compassion in World Farming found that floating dead fish can be found everywhere in crowded salmon farms, and such a harsh living environment is simply a hotbed for the spread of disease.
What is even more frightening is that once the salmon is entangled in sea lice, the scales, skin tissue, surface mucus and blood on the body will soon become food for the parasites.
As the scales of the salmon gradually disappear, in addition to the pain of the body beginning to erode, the pain of infection in the wound or loss of immunity can also plunge them into the abyss of death.
For example, in the clip of "The Ocean Conspiracy", it directly captures the horror of the salmon being eaten alive by a parasite to the eyes, the limbs, and the body.
2.
Marine farmed salmon put into chemicals, antibiotics! Marine pollution affects ecological food chain
In order to solve the salmon nightmare, farmers have to put a lot of irritating chemicals and antibiotics into the box to remove sea lice and reduce the risk of disease in high-density breeding, or to increase the water temperature and try to kill sea lice.
But the pumps and containers used by the former to transport chemicals have undoubtedly made the salmon's sea cages smaller and tighter, while the temperature of the latter has already exceeded the range that the salmon can adapt to, and each of them has brought great pain to the salmon.
At the same time, antibiotics and pesticides flowing into the sea will of course lead to pollution of the surrounding environment, and the organic waste generated by captive salmon will also seriously affect the entire bottom ecology.
In April 2023, the environmental group Greenpeace accused Chile ’ s salmon farming industry of dumping sewage into the ocean, killing more than 5,000 tons of salmon from oxidation.
3.
Undersea cages violate the migratory nature of wild salmon! Millions of animals are ignored
Not only that, Scotland, the world ’ s third largest Atlantic salmon farming exporter, which supplies about 10% of Taiwan ’ s salmon imports each year, has also been raised by the farm animal protection group Compassion in World Farming (CIWF) at the end of 2020, pointing directly to the 22 farms of the local five largest salmon farming companies, and raising millions of salmon in the sea bottom in one breath, completely depriving them of their migratory nature.
Because the migratory nature of salmon has always been a mystery in the animal world, some studies have suggested that salmon can always find the "origin" by remembering the special smell of their birthplace, or by being guided by the magnetic fields of the Sun and Earth.
Regardless of the truth, the physiological structure of salmon is obviously sensitive to sensing the environment, judging the location, and even evading electric shocks in real time.
Therefore, allowing them to roam aimlessly in the box for many years is a kind of cruelty to the body and spirit, depriving the fish instinct of long-distance migration.
All the unhealthy salmon raised in captivity are eaten by humans!
Food chain security in jeopardy
In other words, the three major concerns of captive salmon at sea have caused more than 25% of Scotland ’ s fish populations to suffer and die before they are slaughtered, resulting in a huge waste of food and a complete disregard for animal welfare.
In addition, countless dead fish have been dumped directly in open barrels by Scottish farmers, allowing wild birds and other wildlife to come into contact for food, potentially endangering the safety of other ecological chains.
Salmon farming on land is more humane to the earth! Salmon business opportunities and marine conservation to create food sustainability
Fortunately, this traditional salmon farming method is expected to gradually come to an end.
Because the international company Atlantic Sapphire has been developing "land salmon farm" for 10 years, and in 2022, it invested nearly 4 billion US dollars (about 112 billion US dollars) to build the world's largest land salmon farm Bluehouse in Florida, the United States.
The biggest feature of the land salmon farm is the use of the Recirculating Aquaculture System (RAS) to effectively control the temperature, salinity, pH and oxygen content of the water body, and effectively eliminate carbon dioxide and filter waste, to ensure that the salmon are free from parasites and diseases, while reducing the possibility of marine pollution.
Johan Andreassen, CEO of Atlantic Sapphire: “Ten years ago no one believed that farming salmon on land was financially viable; now Atlantic Sapphire is finally proving that it works, so the question now is how much competition there will be and how much scale there will be in this industry. ”
In order to prove that land-based salmon farming will eventually become a trend in the marine industry, Atlantic Sapphire CEO Johan Andreassen is also looking further into the future, with an estimated 372,000 square meters of fish tanks on about 650,000 square meters of land by 2031, allowing land-based salmon to meet 41% of the annual salmon consumption in the United States.
Also thanks to Atlantic Sapphire, one of the world ’ s largest salmon producers, Norwegian company Grieg Seafood has entered into a joint venture with Årdal Aqua to build a 5,000-tonne annual land farm there.
Salmon Evolution, also from Norway, joined forces with Dongwon Industries, South Korea ’ s largest seafood company, in 2023 to expand its “salmon footprint ” to South Korea.
At the same time, Benchmark Genetics, an aquaculture company that has always strictly controlled the quality of salmon eggs, now sells up to 10% of its salmon eggs to the land-based farming industry to improve the yield and quality of “land-based captive salmon. ”
People from all walks of life, through their own efforts, hope to work for the welfare of salmon, no longer be poisoned by the lust of human words, even if they reproduce artificially, they can also maintain their physical and mental health, and achieve the true meaning of "sustainable food" on earth.
Extended reading:
Taitung version roasted sushi to eat raw meat? Ami youth innovates traditional cuisine with Japanese soul
24 / 7 APP monitoring of Taiwan 's sea bream! Yunlin' s "0 turtle pond" creates 42 times more than 300 million business opportunities
(This article is from the 2023.07.02 "Vision" website and is prohibited from reproducing without consent.)
Salmon Sushi Lang Switching Sushi Netflix
Related News
We can cool down! 11 counties and cities have been warned to rain into the night.
The weather is hot, and an afternoon thunderstorm can cool down slightly.
The weather bureau issued a special report on heavy rain in 11 counties and cities in Taoyuan at 15: 45.
More than 300 people change their name to eat enough … your favorite salmon is abused and pollutes the sea? Netflix "Ocean Conspiracy" exposed to the black screen
In the past, more than 300 people in Taiwan changed their name after turning around the famous sushi restaurant “Sushi Lang ” to launch the“ Free Salmon to Eat ” campaign, setting off a “salmon chaos ” in society, showing the people ’ s love for salmon.
With Netflix ’ s new ecological crisis documentary “Seaspiracy ”, which exposes the problems of antibiotics released by“ sea captive salmon ” and fears of pollution, as well as millions of salmon crammed in underwater cages, mercilessly attacked by fish lice, and violating the nature of wild migration, people can ’ t help but look at the issue of animal persecution. It has been proven to sense pain.
What are the cruelties hidden in the world-famous seafood “farmed salmon ”?
How can fish welfare be improved?
Study: Brain shrinks from 17,000 years ago
As the climate changes, species evolve to change their physiological structures to adapt to the climate, but not necessarily for the better.
An analysis of 50,000 years of climate records and human remains has revealed an adaptive response to a decrease in human brain size, possibly due to environmental stress caused by higher temperatures around 15,000 years ago.
Summer infection and heatstroke cases may peak, man's body temperature is 41.8 degrees and he is in a coma.
According to the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the number of heat injuries from January to June this year reached 956, a new high in three years.
Dr. Kao Wei-feng, chief physician of the Department of Emergency Medicine at the Taipei Medical University Hospital...
A picture of the weather! "Hot Roasted Potato" Relaxed This Afternoon Thunderstorm Until the Weekend
The temperature in Yuli Township, Hualien County was the highest today at 38.3 degrees.
The Central Weather Bureau issued a high temperature signal for tomorrow's 12 counties and cities in the afternoon, but starting tomorrow,...
Taiwan Railway R200 diesel locomotive unveiled
Taiwan Railway 's new R200 diesel-electric locomotive was officially unveiled at a new car meeting in Changhua Fan Garage this afternoon. Minister of Communications Wang Guocai said that Taiwan Railway has compiled a 100 billion yuan car purchase plan in recent years.
udn Forum
Product recommendation

Farmed salmon can contain higher levels of contaminants, such as PCBs, than wild-caught salmon, which can pose health risks to humans who consume them.

Title:

Content: Miscellaneous
Publish Date: December 13, 2021 8: 47 GMT
Updated on: December 13, 2021 9: 40 GMT
Study: Eating Too Much ‘ Farm Salmon ’ May Cause Cancer
A medical study published on Monday warned that overeating salmon raised in farm ponds could lead to cancer.
The Daily Newspaper noted.
+ A -A
Source: Erm News
A medical study published on Monday warned that overeating salmon raised in farm ponds could lead to cancer.
The Daily Express newspaper pointed out that "some previous studies found that salmon, jam in ponds, which is widely consumed around the world, doubles the risk of prostate cancer," pointing out that "salmon is a useful food source for health because it contains omega-3 fatty acids."
"While one salmon is caught in open water, like the seas, the other is bred in tight spaces (farms and ponds), which could have implications for human health," the paper said.
Studies have found that PCBs in farm-raised salmon were about 8 times higher than concentrations in wild salmon, adding that PCBs have been banned for commercial use for decades, but their effects can still be found in the environment, which may adversely affect human diet and therefore health.
According to a study by the Environmental Defense Fund, eating salmon raised in farm ponds on a regular basis may increase the risk of cancer after multiple cases of contamination have been detected in the United States and other countries.
"Medical scientific findings, published in the Journal of Medical Sciences, suggest that cheap farmed salmon sold in stores may do more harm than good."
“Risk analysis suggests that consumption of farmed Atlantic salmon may pose health risks that detract from the beneficial effects of fish consumption, ” the study said.
Eating farmed salmon more than once a month may be enough to increase the risk of cancer.
"In multivariate analyses, men with the highest concentrations of PCBs were twice as likely to develop prostate cancer than men with the lowest concentrations."
Download Erm News app on your phone

What health concerns are there specifically related to additives in farmed salmon feed?

The Omega-3 fatty acid content of farmed salmon can also vary depending on the type of feed used, with some feeds containing higher levels of vegetable oils and lower levels of Omega-3s.

Overall, the use of additives in salmon farming is a complex issue, with both benefits and drawbacks, and more research is needed to fully understand the impacts of these additives on the environment and human health.

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has ruled that mealworms are safe for human consumption, and they can be used as a replacement for fishmeal in salmon farming.

Title:

Content: World’s Largest Insect Farm to Open in France

Once fully operational, the massive vertical farm will produce 200,000 tonnes of insect-based ingredients a year.

Ÿnsect, one of the world’s largest insect rangers, is betting big on bugs to help push the world in a more sustainable direction.

Founded in 2011, the company is fast approaching its goal of opening the world’s largest insect farm and dramatically scaling up its operations. Located about an hour north of Paris, the state-of-the-art facility will leverage automated systems and vertical farming techniques to raise mealworms (Tenebrio molitor) and enable the production of over 200,000 tonnes of insect-based ingredients per year. The site, estimated to be completed by the end of 2022, will join two other Ÿnsect facilities already operational in France and the Netherlands.

"It’s an automated warehouse, very similar to an Amazon warehouse, where instead of storing stuff, we are storing live insects," Ÿnsect CEO and co-founder Antoine Hubert told Time last year. "There is a climate-control system which is highly complex to maintain temperature and moisture from zero to 30 meters high. All operations are automated. Anything that you do on [an insect] farm is done with robots."

Feed for Fish, Fertilizer for Plants, Burgers for Humans

For the past decade, mealworms cultivated at Ÿnsect’s farms have been turned into powders and oils that have become nutritional additives to pet and farm feeds. Thanks to a ruling last year by the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) that deemed mealworms safe for human consumption, the company has also begun selling its powders for shakes, cereal bars, pasta, and even alt-meat burgers. In addition, the shed shells of the rapidly growing mealworms are collected and sold as beneficial organic fertilizers to farmers.

According to MealFlour, a project that promotes mealworm farming as a way to battle malnutrition in Guatemala, a serving of mealworm powder is 55% protein, contains all essential amino and fatty acids, and has more iron than sirloin beef. Compared to the production of milk, pork, chicken, and beef, mealworms are also more sustainable and require fewer resources and energy.

While its recent forays into human foodstuffs have garnered attention, Ÿnsect's focus presently remains on helping to feed sustainably the animals that feed the world. For instance, aquaculture, like salmon farming, is a resource-intensive operation that uses both land-based crops (soy) and massive amounts of wild-caught fish to create what's known as fishmeal. With food production projected to have to grow by more than 70% by 2050 to meet demand, the overfishing of oceans to feed aquaculture operations is not a feasible option. Studies, such as a recent trial by NOAA, have shown that supplementing or even replacing fishmeal with insect- and plant-based foods holds promise for eliminating the need for wild-caught sources. According to Hubert, there are other positives as well.

"They [salmon] were reaching the maturity stage faster and eating less so they were avoiding a large quantity of feed," he told Fast Company in 2020. "There was less mortality so the farmers get more fish eventually than before... This also explains why we have a carbon-negative balance, because we are avoiding so many quantities of inputs to feed fish to have the same quantities of fish."

Hubert added to Fast Company that Ÿnsect has contracts worth more than $100 million with fish feed producers. This past year, with the acquisition of U.S.-based mealworm producer Jord, it also began entering new markets, such as the rapidly growing U.S. backyard chicken feed market.

A Record-Breaking Vertical Farm

One look at the animated video of Ÿnsect’s new facility up above and you can see why it’s been touted as an automated marvel. Mealworms will be reared by robots in stacked tubs stretching several stories tall. Unlike other insect food alternatives such as flies or crickets, mealworms do not hop or fly, allowing the company to maximize the space available.

In an effort to make sure the creatures are ethically farmed, Hubert reached out to philosophers from the Sorbonne University to judge their welfare. As he told The Guardian, the students determined that the mealworms had "more in common with mushroom-growing and hothousing vegetables" than with livestock.

"They have no brain in the strict sense of the word," he said. "We know they have a reflex reaction and they communicate and build intelligent structures, but nobody has shown they feel anything. However, what is important is to respect them as living organisms, which we do."

In addition to the new farm in France, Ÿnsect plans to continue to scale its operations with additional facilities, including a major site in the U.S. The biggest hurdle ahead, however, says Hubert, is making insects a normal part of everyday diets.

"I believe that the big challenge is accepting insects as part of the human diet," he told Authority Magazine. "A large part of the world's population eats insects, but we must be able to prove its properties and its benefits for the environment in order to reach more and have more impact!"

View Article Sources
  1. "Ÿnsect Welcomes European Interministerial Delegation to Amiens." Ynsect.

  2. "Why Eat Mealworms?" MealFlour.

  3. "Edible Insects." Food and Agriculture Organization.

  4. van Dijk, Michiel, et al. "A Meta-Analysis of Projected Global Food Demand and Population At Risk of Hunger for the Period 2010–2050." Nature Food, vol. 2, no. 7, 2021, pp. 494-501., doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00322-9

  5. "The Future of Fish Feed May Lie in Insects, Mold, and Algae." National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Insect-based ingredients have shown promise in supplementing fishmeal in salmon farming, with studies by NOAA demonstrating their potential.

The EU allows mealworms to be used as nutritional additives in pet and farm feeds, including salmon farming.

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

However, there are limited specific country regulations mentioned for salmon farming additives, with most countries having general regulations for aquaculture.

In Canada, fish farms are required to have a sea lice management plan, and the use of certain pesticides like SLICE is regulated.

Title:

Content: Skip to Content

Drug-resistant sea lice an increasing problem for B.C. fish farms, new study finds

By Melanie Nagy

Click here for updates on this story

    May 14, 2022 (CTV Network) — Every spring, endangered juvenile wild salmon migrate from B.C.’s rivers to the Pacific Ocean, but their numbers are dwindling and some fear sea lice parasites are increasingly to blame. Sea lice are tiny, oval shaped crustaceans that can cling to the backs of wild salmon, feeding on their skin, muscle tissue and blood. Adult fish are generally not harmed when a few lice attach themselves, but juveniles with underdeveloped scales can be harmed or killed when heavily infested. While the parasite occurs naturally in the waters off B.C.’s coast, there’s long been concern over outbreaks on aquaculture farms where open-net pens make it possible for lice to move from farmed fish to young migrating salmon. “Salmon farms act as this year-round reservoir for sea lice, potentially providing sea lice to wild juvenile salmon when they wouldn’t normally get them,” conservation biologist Sean Godwin said. Godwin is the lead author in a recent study that looked at the state of sea lice in the Pacific Ocean. Along with his fellow researchers, he found the parasite is increasingly becoming resistant to one of the main tools the industry relies on to combat the problem. “Our paper found that this tool, which is a pesticide known [as] SLICE, or emamectin benzoate, is becoming less effective and that sea lice are developing resistance to it on farms here,” Godwin said. To assess parasite resistance, “bioassay, treatment and salmon-louse count data from 2010 to 2021” were analyzed. During that time, the researchers found a notable decrease in the effectiveness of SLICE. “It is going to be more difficult for salmon farms to control sea lice outbreaks on their farms,” said Godwin. In the province’s stunning Clayoquot Sound, Bonny Glambeck routinely uses a fine-mesh net and a sample cup to test the waters near fish farms. Glambeck heads the Tofino-based conservation society known as Clayoquot Action and every year she monitors industry lice counts and tracks wild salmon infestations. “The control of sea lice on fish farms is something I do not believe the industry has ever been able to crack,” she said. “Parasites like these sea lice proliferate on these farms and then they can pass them on to wild salmon. With that, we feel that every year that goes by and these farms are allowed to pollute the waters with these infestations, they are just wiping out another generation of wild salmon.” Fisheries and Oceans Canada requires all fish farms in Canadian coastal waters to have a sea lice management plan. The federal department also places a limit of three lice per salmon during the spring when young salmon are out-migrating and are most vulnerable. In addition to that, the industry publicly reports lice counts on individual company websites every month. “The worry is that those lice levels might accumulate and then be released back to affect wild migratory salmon. The science doesn’t support that, but the concern exists so the industry responds to that,” said Brian Kingzett. Kingzett is the science and policy director with the BC Salmon Farmers Association. He says the industry has warned the federal government for years about the waning efficacy of SLICE, and has long called on Ottawa to approve new pesticide options. “There are other anti-parasite agents that have been approved in other areas of the world and we would certainly like to add that to our toolbox.” While SLICE is the only approved pesticide in Canada, it is not the only option for a fish farm struggling with a lice infestation. Kingzett says other environmentally friendly methods include the use of specialized delousing boats. One readily used vessel can suck fish from ocean-based pens into tanks where pressurized water is used to forcibly remove any attached lice. According to the industry, any dislodged bugs are collected by filters for disposal so they are not reintroduced to the marine environment. “During the last five years, the industry has spent about $100 million on importing new technologies,” Kingzett said. “Fish farming is an important industry in B.C. because we are facing a global seafood shortage and the farming sector is looking to provide sustainable, high-quality product.” The industry, however, is controversial and there’s been an ongoing battle to have all fish farms in the province removed. Earlier this month, there was a large protest in Tofino involving Indigenous leaders, conservationists and environmentalists. The group took to the waters near a local fish farm to voice their opposition to the industry and call on Ottawa to evict them. “It is a do-or-die moment for the salmon farming industry,” said Alexandra Morton, who is an independent biologist and longtime wild salmon activist. “We need to do whatever we can to save wild salmon populations because they are sadly on the verge of extinction.” In response, those in support of fish farms argue they are not a direct threat to wild salmon and are a vital industry. According to the BC Salmon Farmers Association, there are nearly 5,000 jobs linked to fish farms and at least $1 billion “in economic activity” is generated annually. Despite that, Ottawa has previously announced that it’s committed to phasing out open-net salmon farms in B.C. by 2025. In addition, it’s uncertain if 79 federal fish farm licenses expiring in June will be renewed.

Please note: This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.

Matthew Talbot
matthew.talbot@bellmedia.ca

CNN Newsource

Skip to content

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

Sea lice are becoming resistant to SLICE in Canada, prompting the search for alternative anti-parasite agents.

The Norwegian Aquaculture Act regulates salmon farming in Norway, but there are no specific regulations mentioned for additives.

Title:

Content: DUBLIN, March 9, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- The "Global Salmon Market, By Species, By Fish Type, By Distribution Channel, By Product Type, Estimation & Forecast, 2017 - 2027" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The global salmon market held a market value of USD 20,880.5 Million in 2021 and is projected to reach USD 27,344.0 Million by the year 2027. The market is anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 4.6% from 2022 to 2027. Approximately, 3,282.72 kilo tons of salmon was estimated to be sold in 2021.

Salmon is a common name for a Salmonidae family's species of the ray-finned fish. The market is expected to be driven by the rising prevalence of chronic conditions and global rise in penetration of e-commerce sector. Furthermore, rise in consumer awareness towards the health benefits of salmon are also expected to contribute to the market growth.

Despite the driving factors, depletion of sea species are anticipated to hinder the market growth. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the market was negatively impacted due to closure of fishing activities and hence, decrease in the supply of salmon in global markets.

Growth Influencers:

Rise in consumer awareness towards the health benefits of salmon

Salmon provides various health benefits. It is rich in Omega-3 fatty acids, is a great source of protein, high in Vitamin B, good source of potassium, loaded with selenium, contains astaxanthin, reduced the risk of heart diseases, helps in weight management, helps to fight inflammation, and protects brain health. Consumers are getting aware regarding all these benefits, which is increasing its adoption, hence boosting the market growth.

Competitive Landscape

Major players in the global salmon market include Cermaq Group ASA, Leroy Seafood Group ASA, Mowi ASA, SalMar ASA, AquaChile, Cooke Aquaculture, Bakkafrost, Grieg Seafood, Multiexport, Blumar, Salmones Camanchaca, Australis Seafoods, Nova Sea, Tassal Group, Sinkaberg-Hansen, Nordlaks, Bremnes Seashore, Norway Royal Salmon, Alsaker Fjordbruk, and Other Prominent Players.

These market players are involved in collaborations, mergers & acquisitions, and new product launches, among other initiatives, to strengthen their market presence. For instance, in January 2022, Benchmark Animal Health and Cermaq received funding from the Research Council of Norway for research and development of Tenacibaculum vaccines for Salmon. Furthermore, Bekkafrost collaborated with the salmon industry through the Faroe Fish Farmer's Association And Global Salmon Initiative (GSI).

The global Salmon market report provides insights on the below pointers:

  • Market Penetration: Provides comprehensive information on the market offered by the prominent players
  • Market Development: The report offers detailed information about lucrative emerging markets and analyzes penetration across mature segments of the markets
  • Market Diversification: Provides in-depth information about untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments
  • Competitive Landscape Assessment: Mergers & acquisitions, certifications, product launches in the global Salmon market have been provided in this research report. In addition, the report also emphasizes the SWOT analysis of the leading players.
  • Product Development & Innovation: The report provides intelligent insights on future technologies, R&D activities, and breakthrough product developments
  • Global Salmon Production: Total Harvest of Atlantic Salmon, 2016-2020
  • Salmon Production Cost Breakdown
  • Consumer Behavior Analysis: By Region, By Age, By Gender, By Annual Household Income, Seasonal of Fish
  • Fresh Salmon Export: Trends & Predictions for the Supply of Salmon Consumed (USD Million) in the United States; Largest Fishing Companies
  • Regulatory Landscape: Section 6 of Norwegian Aquaculture Act , Aquaculture Stewardship Council Salmon standard, RSPCA welfare standards for Farmed Atlantic salmon, A Greener World (AGW), Marine Stewardship Council (MSC)

The global Salmon market report answers questions such as:

  • What is the market size and forecast of the Global Salmon Market?
  • What are the inhibiting factors and impact of COVID-19 on the Global Salmon Market during the assessment period?
  • Which are the products/segments/applications/areas to invest in over the assessment period in the Global Salmon Market?
  • What is the competitive strategic window for opportunities in the Global Salmon Market?
  • What are the technology trends and regulatory frameworks in the Global Salmon Market?
  • What is the market share of the leading players in the Global Salmon Market?
  • What modes and strategic moves are considered favorable for entering the Global Salmon Market?

Key Topics Covered:

Chapter 1. Research Framework

Chapter 2. Executive Summary: Global Salmon Market

Chapter 3. Global Salmon Market Overview

3.1. Industry Value Chain Analysis

3.1.1. Raw Material

3.1.2. Processing and Packaging

3.1.3. Distributor

3.1.4. End User

3.2. Industry Outlook

3.2.1. Global Salmon Production

3.2.2. Salmon Production Cost Breakdown

3.2.3. Fresh Salmon Export

3.2.4. Consumer Behavior Analysis

3.2.4.1. Income

3.2.4.2. Occupation

3.2.4.3. Seasonal of Fish

3.2.5. Trends and Predictions for the Supply of Salmon Consumed in the United States

3.2.6. Largest Fishing Companies

3.3. PESTLE Analysis

3.4. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

3.4.1. Bargaining Power of Suppliers

3.4.2. Bargaining Power of Buyers

3.4.3. Threat of Substitutes

3.4.4. Threat of New Entrants

3.4.5. Degree of Competition

3.5. Market Dynamics and Trends

3.5.1. Key Trends

3.5.2. Growth Drivers

3.5.3. Restraints/ Challenges

3.6. Market Growth and Outlook

3.6.1. Market Revenue Estimates and Forecast (US$ Mn), 2017-2027

3.6.2. Market Volume Estimates and Forecast (MMT), 2017-2027

3.6.3. Pricing Analysis

3.7. Covid-19 Impact Assessment on Market Growth Trend

3.7.1. Growth Trend Shift Analysis

3.7.2. Industry Best Practices

3.8. Regulatory Landscape

Chapter 4. Competition Dashboard

4.1. Market Concentration Rate

4.2. Company Market Share Analysis (Value %), 2020

4.3. Competitor Mapping

Chapter 5. Salmon Market Analysis, By Species

5.1. Key Insights

5.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

5.2.1. Atlantic

5.2.2. Pink

5.2.3. Chum/Dog

5.2.4. Coho

5.2.5. Sockeye

5.2.6. Others

Chapter 6. Salmon Market Analysis, By Fish Type

6.1. Key Insights

6.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

6.2.1. Farmed

6.2.2. Wild

Chapter 7. Salmon Market Analysis, By Product Type

7.1. Key Insights

7.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

7.2.1. Canned

7.2.2. Fresh

7.2.3. Frozen

7.2.4. Others

Chapter 8. Salmon Market Analysis, By Retail

8.1. Key Insights

8.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

8.2.1. Retail

8.2.1.1. E-commerce (online)

8.2.1.2. Brick & Mortar Stores (offline)

8.2.2. HoReCa & Wholesale

8.2.3. Processed Food Industry

8.2.4. Other Institutional Customers

Chapter 9. Salmon Market Analysis, By Region

9.1. Key Insights

9.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

9.2.1. North America

9.2.1.1. The U.S.

9.2.1.2. Canada

9.2.1.3. Mexico

9.2.2. Europe

9.2.2.1. Western Europe

9.2.2.1.1. The UK

9.2.2.1.2. Germany

9.2.2.1.3. France

9.2.2.1.4. Italy

9.2.2.1.5. Spain

9.2.2.1.6. Rest of Western Europe

9.2.2.2. Eastern Europe

9.2.2.2.1. Poland

9.2.2.2.2. Russia

9.2.2.2.3. Rest of Eastern Europe

9.2.3. Asia Pacific

9.2.3.1. China

9.2.3.2. India

9.2.3.3. Japan

9.2.3.4. Australia & New Zealand

9.2.3.5. ASEAN

9.2.3.6. Rest of Asia Pacific

9.2.4. Middle East & Africa

9.2.4.1. UAE

9.2.4.2. Saudi Arabia

9.2.4.3. South Africa

9.2.4.4. Rest of MEA

9.2.5. South America

9.2.5.1. Argentina

9.2.5.2. Brazil

9.2.5.3. Rest of South America

Chapter 10. North America Salmon Market Analysis

10.1. Key Insights

10.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

10.2.1. By Species

10.2.2. By Type

10.2.3. By Product

10.2.4. By Distribution Channel

10.2.5. By Country

Chapter 11. Europe Salmon Market Analysis

11.1. Key Insights

11.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

11.2.1. By Species

11.2.2. By Type

11.2.3. By Product

11.2.4. By Distribution Channel

11.2.5. By Country

Chapter 12. Asia Pacific Salmon Market Analysis

12.1. Key Insights

12.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

12.2.1. By Species

12.2.2. By Type

12.2.3. By Product

12.2.4. By Distribution Channel

12.2.5. By Country

Chapter 13. Middle East and Africa Salmon Market Analysis

13.1. Key Insights

13.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

13.2.1. By Species

13.2.2. By Type

13.2.3. By Product

13.2.4. By Distribution Channel

13.2.5. By Country

Chapter 14. South America Salmon Market Analysis

14.1. Key Insights

14.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

14.2.1. By Species

14.2.2. By Type

14.2.3. By Product

14.2.4. By Distribution Channel

14.2.5. By Country

Chapter 15. Company Profile (Company Overview, Financial Matrix, Key Product landscape, Key Personnel, Key Competitors, Contact Address, and Business Strategy Outlook) *

15.1. Cremaq Group ASA

15.2. Leroy Seafood Group ASA

15.3. Mowi ASA

15.4. SalMar ASA

15.5. AquaChile

15.6. Cooke Aquaculture

15.7. Bakkafrost

15.8. Grieg Seafood

15.9. Multiexport

15.10. Blumar

15.11. Salmones Camanchaca

15.12. Australis Seafoods

15.13. Nova Sea

15.14. Tassal Group

15.15. Sinkaberg-Hansen

15.16. Nordlaks

15.17. Bremnes Seashore

15.18. Norway Royal Salmon

15.19. Alsaker Fjordbruk

15.20. Other Prominent players

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/di479t

Media Contact:

Research and Markets

Laura Wood, Senior Manager

press@researchandmarkets.com

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470

For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630

For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907

Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-salmon-market-to-2027---by-species-fish-type-distribution-channel-product-type-and-region-301498918.html

SOURCE Research and Markets

DISCLAIMER FOR COMMENTS: The views expressed by public comments are not those of this company or its affiliated companies. Please note by clicking on "Post" you acknowledge that you have read the TERMS OF USE and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Your comments may be used on air. Be polite. Inappropriate posts or posts containing offsite links, images, GIFs, inappropriate language, or memes may be removed by the moderator. Job listings and similar posts are likely automated SPAM messages from Facebook and are not placed by WFMZ-TV.

The Aquaculture Stewardship Council sets standards for salmon farming, including requirements for feed and additives.

In China, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs implements a National Aquatic Products plan, which includes monitoring of veterinary drug residues in aquatic products.

Title:

Content: People 's Daily Online > > Economy and Technology
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs: In the first half of 2023, the pass rate of veterinary drug residue monitoring of aquatic products in China is 99.2%.
08 / 09 / 2023 14: 07 | Source: People's Daily Online
Small number
Beijing, August 9 (Reporter Li Dong) Recently, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs released the monitoring of veterinary drug residues of aquatic products in the first half of 2023.
The monitoring results show that in the first half of 2023, the qualified rate of veterinary drug residue monitoring of aquatic products in China is 99.2%, and the qualified rate of veterinary drug residue monitoring of aquatic products in China is continuously stable at more than 99%.
From the sampling of species, the yellow fish, turbot, flounder, rainbow trout, floral perch, spotted catfish, prawns and clayfish are all qualified.
In March this year, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs launched the implementation of the 2023 National Aquatic Products Veterinary Drug Residues Monitoring Plan and the 2023 National Aquatic Animal Disease Monitoring Plan to deploy the supervision of veterinary drugs and other inputs for aquaculture in 2023 and the prevention and control of aquatic animal diseases.
According to the relevant person in charge of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, according to the plan, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs monitors the residual status of aquatic veterinary drugs in 31 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government), four planned cities and Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, and investigates the hidden safety risks of so-called "non-pharmaceutical" "" and other unapproved inputs for aquaculture.
"At the same time, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs will also carry out special monitoring of 11 aquatic animal diseases in 30 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government) and the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, investigate three aquatic animal diseases and carry out research on grass carp related diseases," the person said.
"In the next step, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs will strengthen the supervision and law enforcement of key varieties and key drugs according to the monitoring results, strengthen training and publicity and guidance on the popularization of drug related knowledge, and guide all localities to further implement the local responsibility, supervision responsibility and the main responsibility of producers and operators.
(Editor: Qiao Yiqiong, Gao Lei)
Public Number ： People 's Network Finance
Share it so more people can see it.
Back to top

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning antibiotics in farmes salmon?

China has a high pass rate for veterinary drug residue monitoring in aquatic products, with a rate of 99.2%.

Russia has veterinary rules for keeping fish in artificially created habitats, including requirements for feed distribution systems and waste removal.

Title:

Content: Karelia23 November 2021 8: 52
From September 1, new veterinary rules for keeping fish came into force
Trout farming is a key branch of Karelian agriculture.
Most of the Russian trout is grown in our region.
Trout farming is a key branch of Karelian agriculture
In order for the fish that will fall on the table of consumers to be of high quality and safe, enterprises need to comply with veterinary requirements.
The North Sea Interregional Office of the Rosselkhoznadzor informs.
On September 1, 2021, the Veterinary Rules for keeping fish and other aquatic animals in an artificially created habitat for the purpose of their breeding, cultivation, sale and acclimatization, approved by Order of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation No. 782 of December 23, 2020, came into force.
The rules provide requirements for the maintenance of fish in farms.
Thus, fish or other aquatic animals should be provided with water that meets quality standards for objects of fishery significance, including standards for maximum permissible concentrations of harmful substances.
When entering the territory of fish farming areas, it is necessary to disinfect the chassis of vehicles with disinfectant aerosols.
Disinfection is subject to equipment and inventory used in the areas.
Disinfection mats (cuvettes) are installed at the entrances and exits in the premises located on separate production areas along the width of the passage with a length of at least 1 m, filled with foam, sawdust or other porous elastic material and impregnated with disinfectant solutions.
Rules for cleaning feed distribution systems are provided.
For example, when using automated wet feed dispensing systems, equipment and devices for dispensing feed are cleaned and washed after each feeding.
With the use of automated dry feed distribution systems, equipment and devices for the distribution of feed are washed, disinfected and dried after the end of the production cycle, but at least once a year.
Requirements for cages
Requirements for the location of sites are described (for example, quarantine sites should be located below the terrain and the watercourse), as well as the equipment necessary for the sites (tanks for antiparasitic, therapeutic and prophylactic treatment of fish, an independent water supply system, etc.).
Fish cages or other technical means used for keeping fish within the boundaries of the fish breeding site shall be designed to be resistant to destruction or deformation during their operation, as well as during mechanical cleaning of their surface from fouling, and shall be made of corrosion-resistant and harmless to aquatic animals materials.
During operation, the cages should be attached to shore facilities or anchor systems.
Attachment structures should ensure the integrity of cages and the preservation of their placement within the boundaries of the fish breeding site.
The mesh size of the cage shall correspond to the size of the fish contained in them in order to prevent injury to them, as well as to prevent the penetration of animals beyond the cage.
The design of the cages should provide for the possibility of removing the corpses of fish from them during the period of detention.
Removal of corpses of fish, as well as aquatic animals with external injuries, should be carried out daily.
Removal of corpses of fish and other aquatic animals from the bottom of the cages should be carried out at least once a year.
Removal of waste products of fish, as well as residues of feed from cages should be provided with the help of a watercourse and (or) forced drainage.
When keeping fish of different age groups, the content of each age group of fish should be carried out in cages standing separately from each other.
Cages intended for keeping fish up to the age of 2 years inclusive are placed upstream.
When carrying out bleeding of fish and other aquatic animals, the discharge of blood into water bodies is prohibited.
Disease prevention
Veterinary regulations also provide for requirements for quarantine of fish and requirements for mandatory preventive measures and diagnostic studies of fish.
Fish are subject to inspection, diagnostic studies, vaccinations and treatments in accordance with the plans of anti-epizootic measures established in the area, as well as preventive anti-parasitic treatments when transplanted from one reservoir to another.
Inspection with laboratory (ichthyopathological) studies of fish contained in isolated production areas should be carried out at least 4 times a year, and on non-isolated - at least 2 times a year.
Laboratory (ichthyopathological) studies should be carried out in ichthyopathological laboratories located in areas intended for the maintenance of producers and repair young animals, incubation of caviar, in quarantine areas, or in laboratories that are part of the system of bodies and organizations of the State Veterinary Service of the Russian Federation, or accredited in the national accreditation system.
Disposal and destruction of fish corpses are carried out in accordance with the veterinary rules for the movement, storage, processing and disposal of biological waste, approved by the Order of the Ministry of Agriculture of Russia No. 626 of October 26, 2020.
Features of keeping fish, other aquatic animals are established in accordance with the status of the region, established in accordance with the Veterinary rules for regionalization of the territory of the Russian Federation, approved by the order of the Ministry of Agriculture of Russia of December 14, 2015.
N 635.
It 's interesting

Fish farms in Russia must provide water meeting quality standards for fishery significance, and disinfection of vehicles and equipment is required.

The use of feed-grade fish in aquaculture is being reduced in China, with a target to drop feed-grade fish catch to below 20% by 2020.

China is the world's biggest consumer of fishmeal, mostly used in aquaculture, and imports around 1.4 million tonnes of fishmeal annually.

Compound feed used in aquaculture in China contains animal and plant-based ingredients and added nutrients.

Antibiotic use in animals, including salmon farming, requires a veterinary prescription.

Title:

Content: Agriland recently shared part one in a two-part myth-busting series about antibiotics and animals from the European Platform for the Responsible Using of Medicines in Animals (EPRUMA).

Here, we present part two in the series.

  • Myth 1 – Intensive farming favours the development of antimicrobial resistance
  • Fact – The main driver for resistance development is the level of use/misuse of antibiotics, which is not necessarily linked to farm scale or system. Resistant bacteria are found on intensive and organic farms alike, since animals become sick at some time in all production systems, and so are treated with veterinary antibiotics whenever this is deemed necessary by a veterinarian (Commission Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007).
  • Myth 2 – Antibiotics are excessively used in animals by non-competent persons
  • Fact – Regulation 2019/6 indicates that antibiotics in animals are used only following the examination, diagnosis and prescription by a vet. Vets are highly educated to evaluate the health condition of animals under their care, to diagnose and to prescribe the necessary treatment in the same way that doctors do for people. They are additionally well-aware of the mechanisms leading to the development of antibiotic resistance and the risks for animals and people in the same way that doctors are for people. Enforcing veterinary supervision and care through the implementation of regular veterinary visits as foreseen by the Regulation (EU) 2016/429 can have a major impact on promotion and implementation of best practices, which leads to better health of animals and minimise the need to use antibiotics.
  • Myth 3 – Preventive treatment is used on EU farms to compensate for poor hygiene and husbandry
  • Fact – Animals, like humans, can become sick even when kept under the best conditions. Animals are recognised as sentient beings and have to be treated by a vet when sick. Applying preventive biosecurity measures is also crucial in ensuring overall health of animals. Regulation 2019/6 bans the preventive (prophylactic) use of antibiotics in groups of animals. Preventive treatment with antibiotics in animals is only permitted for individual animals and in exceptional cases for a small number of animals, when the risk of an infection is very high and the consequences are likely to be severe.
  • The use of antibiotics in animals is only allowed on veterinary prescription and the use of veterinary medicines ‘to compensate for poor hygiene, inadequate animal husbandry or lack of care or to compensate for poor farm management’ is expressly banned as per Regulation 2019/6.
  • Myth 4 – Treatment of animals as a group is not necessary in farming practices in the EU
  • Fact – Treatment of groups of animals through their drinking water/feed can be the safest and most effective treatment method. Regulation 2019/4 on medicated feed introduces strict rules for the use of oral medication, via feed or water. Getting control of individual animals and injecting them can be very stressful to the animal, especially if a course of treatment involving daily dosage is needed. Hence, this makes individual treatment stressful and impractical. It should be up to the vet to decide the optimum way to administer medication, which remains under veterinary control and prescription.
  • Myth 5 – We have to set a target for zero use of antibiotics in animals
  • Fact – The target should be the reduction of antibiotic resistance and not the zero use of antibiotics in animals or in people. Antibiotics must be available when needed and be used prudently and responsible in both animals and humans, following a diagnosis and a prescription by a veterinarian (in animals) or a doctor (in humans), who need these tools to control infections and stop the spread of disease.

Regular veterinary visits promote best practices and reduce the need for antibiotics in salmon farming.

Preventive biosecurity measures are crucial for animal health in salmon farming, and antibiotic use is banned to compensate for poor hygiene or management.

Group treatment of animals is allowed through medicated feed or water in salmon farming, but the use of antibiotics is regulated.

Researchers are exploring alternatives to antibiotics, such as bacteriophages, which are viruses that can target and kill specific bacteria, to reduce antibiotic use in salmon farming.

Title:

Content: News

Proteon Pharma to set up plant in Maharashtra

Our Bureau | Updated on: Apr 20, 2022

The company is a global leader in bacteriophage technology for livestock farming and aquaculture | Photo Credit: MOORTHY M

To produce antibacterial solution for livestock by 2023 and tap neighbouring countries

Poland-based Proteon Pharmaceuticals (India) plans to set up a fully functional plant in Maharashtra to produce antibacterial solution for livestock by 2023.

The company is a global leader in bacteriophage technology for livestock farming and aquaculture and aims to improve the food safety standard of animal products by reducing the usage of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) risk in poultry, dairy and aqua.

It provides an innovative, safe and effective antibacterial solution as bacteriophages which are an alternative to antibiotics to control the pathogenic bacteria.

The company is also looking to scale up its operations in South-East Asia, especially India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Vietnam and neighbouring countries.

Sachin Ingewar, Regional Sales Director, India Subcontinent and South East Asia Region, said the company will strengthen the base of channel partners and is in talks to commence distribution of products in other APAC countries.

The growing demand for packaged and processed meat has pushed the livestock farm owners to produce antibiotic-free meat to match consumers’ demand. However, bacteriophages being an innovative new product for the Indian market, the acceptance of the product has been slow as customers are not fully aware of the benefits.

“Switching over from a traditional medication method to a relatively new concept is about a change in mindset and this is the only challenge," he said.

Major infection

Diseases caused by Salmonella and E. coli are the major challenges faced by poultry producers. The infection caused by these bacteria not only impacts poultry’s health but also the profitability of the producer and consumers health.

Proteon introduced Bafasal+G® into the Indian market few years back and last year Bafacoltm was launched as a feed additive for poultry to control infection.

“We have also introduced Bafador for aquaculture to control Pseudomonas and Aeromonas challenges, and will soon be launching Bafacam to control mastitis in dairy animals. There are also many other products in the pipeline to enhance the profitability of the farm owners,” said Ingewar.

Published on April 20, 2022
COMMENTS

You May Also Like

Recommended for you

What health concerns are there specifically related to additives in farmed salmon feed?

Proteon Pharma is one company that uses bacteriophage technology to reduce antibiotic use in aquaculture, including salmon farming.

Bacteriophages are a new product in the Indian market and have been introduced to control Salmonella and E. coli in salmon farming.

The use of bacteriophages has been shown to be effective in reducing antibiotic use and promoting a healthier environment in salmon farming.

Title:

Content: A new bacteriophage has been discovered
Bacteria of the genus Aeromonas are a real thunderstorm of fish farms, when infected, most of their inhabitants die.
Scientists propose to use against the pathogen its natural enemies - viruses that can infect and destroy these bacteria.
Microbiologists from the Federal Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, together with foreign colleagues, identified a potentially suitable virus belonging to a previously unknown genus, and studied its genome.
An article describing a new bacteriophage, called Gekk3-15, was published in F1000Research.
The work was carried out within the framework of the NCMU "Agrotechnologies of the Future", implemented with the support of the national project "Science and Universities".
In most developed countries, fish are bred in special aquaculture farms.
But, growing it in artificial reservoirs, there is a risk of losing a considerable share of the livestock.
The fact is that due to the large crowding in cages and artificial ponds, bacterial infections spread rapidly among fish - much faster than in their natural habitat.
One of the most common diseases in the inhabitants of such farms is caused by bacteria from the genus Aeromonas.
In severe cases, aeromonosis destroys up to 90% of the livestock, and breeders have a long time to clean and disinfect the cages before starting to grow fish again.
Antibiotics can be used to control pathogens, but in many countries, at different stages of food production, they are strictly regulated or even banned.
Strains of bacteriophage viruses act precisely and selectively only on certain bacteria, so they are considered a promising biological agent against infections, including in fisheries.
This method of protection is safe for the environment, humans and animals.
Microbiologists from the Federal Research Center of Biotechnology RAS with colleagues from the University of Leicester (UK) for the first time sequenced and decoded the genome of one of the bacteriophages - a natural enemy of the bacteria Aeromonas.
In search of varieties of viruses that would suit this purpose, biologists took samples in Russian reservoirs.
One of the most promising was a strain isolated in 2021 from the Norishka River in Mikhailovsky Park in Moscow, which was called Gekk3-15.
It turned out to be a small myovirus with a genome of 64,847 base pairs.
Virologists read and deciphered his genome, and also studied the structure of the new strain under an electron microscope.
In the genes of the virus, structural proteins were encrypted - including those necessary to create the "tail" of the bacteriophage, which scientists observed under a microscope.
It acts as a syringe and is able to contract and inject the genetic material of the virus into the shell of the victim cell.
The researchers studied the genes responsible for the metabolism of the new Gekk3-15 and proved its ability to destroy the bacterial cells it infected.
Virologists examined the genes of the virus using databases of genomic sequences to find its closest “relatives ” and determine its place on the evolutionary tree.
Since the percentage of similarity of structural proteins in Gekk3-15 and related virus Pseudomonas phage (strain EPa61) ranged from 38% to 63%, the scientists concluded that the studied virus is a representative of a new genus, and maybe even a subfamily.
Thus, in the course of the study, scientists discovered a representative of a new bacteriophage taxon - the Gekk3-15 phage, which expands the idea of   the biological diversity of bacterial viruses.

Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) is a method of farming that uses finned-fish, shellfish, and seaweeds together to benefit each other and reduce the need for antibiotics.

IMTA has been shown to reduce environmental effects and provide a sustainable source of fertilizer, and is being developed in countries such as Scotland, Ireland, and France.

Genetic research is also being conducted to identify disease-resistant genes in salmon, which could help reduce the need for antibiotics in salmon farming.

Title:

Content: Roslin Institute conducts research to identify disease-resistant genes in salmon
With the aim of identifying the genes that can make Atlantic salmon resistant to sea lice and parasites that severely affect fish health and well-being, scientists are costing the global aquaculture sector around £800 million a year. acquired with regard to the resistance mechanisms of Atlantic salmon, which is highly sensitive.
Led by researchers from the Roslin Institute and the Institute of Aquaculture at the University of Stirling, the project will receive a total of £1.7 million from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and the Sustainable Aquaculture Innovation Centre (SAIC), which is an industrial partnership award with aquaculture company Benchmark Genetics.
Gene selection
Researchers will use previously collected data from 12,000 infected fish to identify areas of the salmon genome associated with resistance to sea lice, and will also compare Atlantic salmon with Coho salmon to investigate key mechanisms, genes and proteins involved in their various responses to lice.
These genes will then be targeted to produce genetically modified salmon embryos, and gene editing, which enables precise and targeted changes to genetic code, has been used in previous studies by scientists from the Roslin Institute to identify disease-resistant genes in salmon, and has potential applications in aquaculture to improve health and well-being traits.
Alternative control strategies, such as feed supplements and clean fish, are partially effective, as some lice develop drug resistance, and selective breeding to increase salmon resistance to lice is an effective but relatively slow process because salmon production takes up to four years to reach maturity for reproduction.
Importance of research
Prof Ross Houston, personal head of genetics in aquaculture at the Roslin Institute, said: “Gene editing has the potential to accelerate disease-resistant salmon reproduction by making targeted changes informed by years of research into the genetic and functional mechanisms of resistance to sea lice. It is a major source of employment in rural communities in the Scottish Highlands.
Dr Diego Robledo of the Roslin Institute says: “Different species show varying resistance to sea lice, while Atlantic salmon are very durable, the Koho salmon is almost completely resistant, and we ’ ll compare the genomes of the two species to understand how they relate to their response to lice, so we can identify the main mechanisms underlying resistance in Koho salmon. genomic editing. ”
Professor James Brown, Professor of Aquatic Animal Health at the University of Stirling, said: “The Institute of Aquaculture at the University of Stirling offers more than 30 years of research on the interactions of sea lice and Atlantic salmon in this collaboration.

What health concerns are there specifically related to additives in farmed salmon feed?

Gene editing is being used to produce disease-resistant salmon embryos, which could help reduce the need for antibiotics in salmon farming.

What health concerns are there specifically related to additives in farmed salmon feed?

Selective breeding is also being used to increase salmon resistance to sea lice, but this is a slow process.

Alternative control strategies, such as feed supplements and clean fish, are being used to reduce the need for antibiotics in salmon farming.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has created a platform to help countries deal with antibiotic resistance, and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has developed an Action Plan to support the Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance.

Title:

Content: World Health Organization: 70% used antibiotics unnecessarily during Coronavirus treatment
Monday ، 22 November 2021 01: 26 PM
Global Health Press Conference on the Use of Antibiotics in Coronavirus Treatment
I wrote Hope Allam.
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
On Monday, 22 November, the World Health Organization (WHO) held a video press conference on aspects surrounding the use of antibiotics in the treatment of Coronavirus, and the current situation, on the occasion of World Antibiotics Day, which falls from 18 to 24 November each year.
The World Health Organization (WHO) said in a statement that this year the slogan "Spread awareness and contribute to stopping drug resistance against microbes."
For his part, Dr. Gary Gregg Konioshi, Consultant Emergency Health at the Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, said that Corona is not treated with antibiotics, which have been used randomly, which is useless in the treatment of Corona virus, and it also has serious complications on the heart and kidneys, explaining that bacterial infection may be a form of complication of the virus, and can be used in the case of bacterial infection only. Bacterial infections account for only 4%, and they are those who develop the bacterial infection associated with the coronavirus, although 70% have taken antibiotics unnecessarily.
He said that antibiotics are not used except under the guidance of a doctor and are not used in the infection of the virus, explaining that taking antibiotics will not affect them as a very small percentage are those who get a bacterial infection associated with the infection of the coronavirus.
For her part, Dr. Hanan Belkhi, Assistant Director General at the headquarters of antimicrobial resistance, said that the resistance of bacteria to antibiotics threatens human health and has repercussions on animal health, so the World Health Organization has created a platform to help countries implement their plans to deal with the resistance of bacteria to antibiotics in order to maintain the effectiveness of antibiotics. We know the ability of the virus to mutate.
Dr. Maha Talaat, Regional Advisor for Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Prevention and Control at the WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, explained that bacterial resistance has an impact on dental health, and there must be awareness and we must know our effective role to combat this problem as antibiotics have lost their effectiveness in fighting various diseases.
Antimicrobial drugs are essential in the treatment of diseases, and their use is essential to protect human and animal health, the overuse of antimicrobials in the livestock, aquaculture and crop production sector is a major concern for the risk of the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistant microorganisms (antibiotics).
Antimicrobials are widely used in aquaculture, animal production, and in crop cultivation, and can be spread through our food, the organization said, explaining that since the beginning of the coronavirus epidemic, there has been extensive use of antibiotics to treat bacterial infections in coronavirus patients.
FAO ’ s Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance supports the WHO-led Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance in highlighting the need for a “One Health ” approach, involving public health and veterinary authorities, the food and agriculture sector, and the environment.
The main objectives of the action plan are to improve awareness on antimicrobial resistance and related threats, develop surveillance capacity, strengthen governance on antimicrobial resistance, and promote good practices in food and agricultural systems for the prudent use of antimicrobials.
FAO is working closely in a tripartite initiative with the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), to ensure a collaborative approach to one health from all sectors in the Region, which is essential to effectively address antimicrobial resistance.
The message of the World Antimicrobial Awareness Week (WAAW) 2021, “Spread Awareness, Stop Resistance ” will contribute to creating awareness to control antimicrobial resistance.
The press conference was attended by Dr. Gary Gregg Kuniyoshi, Emergency Health Consultant at the Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office, Dr. Maha Talaat, Regional Advisor for Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Prevention and Control at the Regional Office of the Organization for the Eastern Mediterranean, and Dr. Jenan Belkhi, Assistant Director-General at the Antimicrobial Resistance Headquarters.
Leave a comment and read the comments of the readers.
No comments on the news.
Leave a comment
Your comment will appear after the review.

The FAO works with the WHO and the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) to address antimicrobial resistance in salmon farming and other animal health issues.

What health concerns are there specifically related to additives in farmed salmon feed?

Antibiotic resistance is a major concern in salmon farming, and countries are taking steps to reduce the use of antibiotics and promote more sustainable and healthy farming practices.

What has the release of Netflix's ecological crisis documentary "Seaspiracy"  exposed?

The pollution risks associated with antibiotics used in sea-farmed salmon.

What health concerns are there specifically related to additives in farmed salmon feed?

Sea lice are a major problem in salmon farming, and can harm or kill juvenile wild salmon, and the industry is spending millions of dollars to develop new technologies to control sea lice.

Canada requires fish farms to have a sea lice management plan, and farms are publicly reporting lice counts every month.

The use of specialized delousing boats is one method being used to remove sea lice from fish, and researchers are exploring new methods to control sea lice, including the use of genetic research to identify disease-resistant genes in salmon.

The Norwegian Aquaculture Act regulates salmon farming in Norway, and there are also certifications for humane and sustainable salmon farming from organizations such as the Aquaculture Stewardship Council, RSPCA, and A Greener World.

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

The Aquaculture Stewardship Council sets a standard for salmon farming, which includes requirements for the use of additives in feed.

The RSPCA sets welfare standards for farmed Atlantic salmon, which may include guidelines for the use of additives.

A Greener World certifies humane salmon farming, which may involve the use of certain additives or prohibitions on others.

The Marine Stewardship Council certifies sustainable salmon fishing, but it is not clear if this certification includes standards for additives used in feed.

There are no specific regulations mentioned for the use of additives in salmon farming in Canada and Chile.

Norway plans to boost salmon farming with research on mesopelagic fish and algae, which may involve the use of new additives in feed.

Compound feed use reduces fishmeal and fish oil in aquaculture, and fishmeal and fish oil are essential ingredients in compound feeds.

No global standards are mentioned for the use of additives in salmon farming, which may indicate a lack of regulation in this area.

The actual escapees of salmon from farms in Norway were two to four times higher than reported, and genetic introgression of escaped farmed salmon altered wild salmon life history, but it is not clear if additives played a role in this.

Title:

Content: ‘It will be death knell for all Connemara rivers’: fish farm plan sparks concerns

Angling: Covid-19 regulations fail to dampen spirits at Annamoe Fishery event

Tipperary angler Pat Noonan (centre), winner of the post-Christmas outing at Annamoe Trout Fisheries, with six rainbow trout. On left, Stuart McGrane, organiser of the day and Brian Nally, proprietor

The report in Angling Notes in November last focused on alerting readers of the application by MOWI (formally Marine Harvest) for a proposed new 22-cage fish farm in Ballinakill Bay, Connemara. The Department of Marine has recently announced that the application is now being processed.

Numerous correspondence of grave concern have been sent to Minister for the Marine Charlie McConalogue and Minister for the Environment Eamon Ryan in relation to the proposed licence application.

Inland Fisheries Ireland (IFI) has submitted its reasons for objecting to the licence as have Salmon Watch Ireland, Galway Bay Against Salmon Cages and many environmental groups and angling clubs throughout the country.

Commenting on behalf of the Drowes Fishery, Seamus O’Neill said: “If this licence is granted it will be the death knell for all of the Connemara rivers, especially the Kylemore river, which enters the sea at Ballinakill Bay. The decision by IFI to publish its submission in the new year is unusual and most welcome,” he said.

New scientific evidence of the detrimental effects fish farms are having on the environment is coming to light on a regular basis. In MOWI’s home country, the Norwegian government appointed 13 scientists to report on the effects fish farms are having on the wild salmon population returning to rivers.

The report by the Norwegian Scientific Advisory Committee for Atlantic Salmon is most terrifying. Of particular interest are the sections on the detrimental effects salmon farm lice and escapees are having on wild salmon populations.

In 2019, 1,393,000 metric tons of farmed Atlantic salmon were produced in Norway. It was reported that 43,000 escaped from fish farms in 2020. The mean annual number of escapees reported during the last 10 years was 168,000 salmon.

The actual numbers were two to four times higher than reported, according to the Institute of Marine Research during 2005-2011.

Studies have also shown there is widespread genetic introgression of escaped farmed salmon in wild salmon. The gene flow from escaped farmed salmon has altered the life history of wild Atlantic salmon in Norwegian rivers. Individuals with high levels of introgression from farmed fish have altered age and size at maturation.

Salmon returning to rivers each year has also diminished due to the impacts of salmon lice. This reduction threatens salmon populations in the most impacted areas and has significantly reduced the harvestable surplus for angling and marine fisheries over large parts of the country.

In 2010-2014, the report estimated that 50,000 fewer salmon returned from the ocean each year due to the impacts of salmon lice. For 2018, it was estimated there was a reduction of 29,000 salmon due to salmon lice, and for 2019 a reduction of 39,000 salmon.

The full report can be viewed at Status of Wild Atlantic Salmon in Norway 2021.

Covid fails to dampen spirits at Annamoe Fishery

Covid regulations were to the fore at the post-Christmas fly fishing outing to Annamoe Fishery in Roundwood, Co Wicklow, last Tuesday.

All the usual protocols associated with competitions were set aside for the 15 competitors. No gatherings, no cross-checking size limits, 5m distance between anglers and the fishery lodge remained closed. It was a case of bring your own sandwiches and tea and stay outside at your peg.

That said, the day was a huge success. “It was like a summer’s day” was a comment overheard. Mild temperatures, sunshine and slack winds. And the fish responded in good numbers too. A total of 34 trout were landed (and returned), with Templemore angler Pat Noonan taking the honours with six fish. Craig Sheridan caught a beauty of 3.5lb.

Annamoe Trout Fisheries is open most days. Contact Brian for fly-casting lessons and further details at 0404-45470.

*If you have an angling story to share, please send to me at angling@irishtimes.com.

GO BACK
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Salmon lice reduced salmon returns by 50,000 in Norway from 2010-2014, and salmon lice caused fewer salmon returns in subsequent years, but the relationship between additives and salmon l

Salmon lice reduced salmon returns by 50,000 in Norway from 2010-2014, and salmon lice caused fewer salmon returns in subsequent years, but the relationship between additives and salmon l

Salmon lice reduced salmon returns by 50,000 in Norway from 2010-2014, and salmon lice caused fewer salmon returns in subsequent years, but the relationship between additives and salmon l