The use of additives in salmon farming is a common practice to promote fish health and growth, with substances like antibiotics and pesticides being used to control disease and parasites.

Additives such as probiotics, prebiotics, and essential oils are also used in salmon farming to improve fish health and immunity.

Lactic Acid Bacillus B4 is a probiotic additive used in salmon farming to improve fish growth and immunity.

Glucan is a prebiotic used in salmon farming to increase probiotics in the body and regulate immunity.

Insect-based ingredients, such as mealworms, are used as nutritional additives in salmon farming to provide a sustainable alternative to traditional feed sources.

However, the use of additives in salmon farming can also have negative consequences, such as the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the contamination of farmed salmon with toxic chemicals like PCBs.

The use of non-heat-treated residues in fish feed can transfer Salmonella and Escherichia coli, posing health risks to humans.

Untreated residues can cause economic losses for breeders and health disasters, highlighting the need for proper treatment and regulation.

Regulatory agencies, such as those in Taiwan and China, monitor the use of additives in salmon farming and impose fines and penalties for non-compliance.

In Canada, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans regulates salmon farming, including the use of additives, and requires fish farms to have a sea lice management plan.

The European Food Safety Agency has deemed mealworms safe for human consumption, providing a potential alternative to traditional additives.

The FDA monitors seafood imports for banned antibiotics and additives, and refuses contaminated products from several countries.

China has a National Aquatic Products Veterinary Drug Residues Monitoring Plan, which supervises veterinary drugs and other inputs for aquaculture.

The Ministry of Agriculture in China monitors veterinary drug residues in aquatic products, including salmon, and has a 99.9% pass rate of veterinary drug residue monitoring.

Overall, the use of additives in salmon farming is a complex issue, with both benefits and drawbacks, and more research is needed to fully understand the impacts on human health and the environment.

Standards and regulations governing the use of additives in salmon farming vary by country, with some countries having stricter regulations than others.

In Norway, the Aquaculture Act regulates salmon farming, including the use of additives, but the specifics of these regulations are not provided.

The use of additives in salmon farming is also guided by standardized drug use to ensure aquatic product safety.

Provinces in China investigate and punish cases of illegal banned drug use, and regulatory agencies release lists of food violations for border inspection.

The FDA suspends import applications from non-compliant farms, and regulatory agencies inspect food products for pesticide residue tolerance standards.

China has a strict approval management system for food additives, and only safe and necessary food additives are approved for use.

Regulatory agencies in Chile, such as the Superintendencia del Medio Ambiente, can impose fines and revoke permits for non-compliance with environmental regulations.

In the EU, regulatory agencies investigate antitrust breaches and monitor the use of additives in salmon farming.

The EU is the main importer of Norwegian farmed Atlantic salmon, and regulatory agencies take measures to ensure compliance with additive use standards.

Meetings are held with industry experts to promote correct drug use, and regulatory agencies conduct spot checks on breeding grounds.

The National Authority monitors foodstuffs and agricultural inputs, and ensures conformity with international quality standards.

The Ministry of Health sets up joint committees for food safety, and regulatory agencies focus on prevention and control of food risks.

Non-compliance with additive use standards can lead to economic losses and health disasters, highlighting the importance of compliance with additive use standards.

Fines can be imposed for non-compliance, and regulatory agencies can close non-compliant farms to strengthen source management.

Regulatory agencies release lists of food violations for border inspection, and contaminated products can be detected through border inspections.

The use of additives in salmon farming is regulated by various agencies, and non-compliance can have severe consequences.

The use of additives in salmon farming is a common practice to promote fish health and growth, with substances like antibiotics and pesticides being used to control disease and parasites.

Additives such as probiotics, prebiotics, and essential oils are also used in salmon farming to improve fish health and immunity.

Title:

Content: Compound Harmless Feed Additive Market – Status and Development, Average Product Price and Market Shares of Key Players

Market Research Reports, Business Consulting Services & Analytics

The increase in the demand for and consumption of livestock-based products as well as the growth in animal feed production is anticipated to grow the market.

HYDERABAD, TELANGANA, INDIA, January 17, 2023 /EINPresswire.com/ -- IndustryARC, in its latest report, predicts that The Compound Harmless Feed Additive Market is estimated to reach $29.2 billion by 2028, growing at a CAGR of 5.1% over the forecast period 2023-2028. Feed additives are a diverse group of molecules, substances or living things that help animals take food, absorb it, assimilate it into their bodies, grow and stay healthy. They have an impact on physiological processes like reproduction, stress resistance and immune system performance. Feed additives can be immune stimulants, probiotics, prebiotics, essential oils, acidifiers or others. The anticipated rise in demand for feed additives as a consequence of the growing demand for animal feed is one of the major factors driving the market for compound harmless feed additives during the forecast period of 2023–2028. According to European Feed Manufacturers' Federation, farm animals in the EU27 consumed an estimated 701 million tonnes of feed in 2021, of which about 22 % are produced by Compound Feed manufacturers.

Click here to browse the complete report summary:
https://www.industryarc.com/Research/Global-Compound-Harmless-Feed-Additive-Industry-Market-Research-511853

Save more @ IndustryARC,
Use the code “FLAT1000” & get FLAT 1000$ OFF on any Market Report
Offer available for limited period only..!!

Key takeaways:

This IndustryARC report on the Compound Harmless Feed Additive Market highlights the following areas -

1. Geographically, North America dominated the Compound Harmless Feed Additive market in 2022, owing to the rising livestock production in Mexico and the United States. Asia-Pacific is anticipated to be the fastest growing market during the forecast period 2023-2028, owing to the heavy demand for natural poultry feed additives augmented by the consumption of processed poultry in countries such as China, India and Australia.

2. The increase in the demand for and consumption of livestock-based products as well as the growth in animal feed production is anticipated to grow over the forecast period of 2023–2028.

3. The standardization of meat products as a result of disease outbreaks and the implementation of innovative animal husbandry practices to improve meat quality are projected to drive the market.

4. A detailed analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats would be provided in the Compound Harmless Feed Additive Market Report.

Interested in knowing more relevant information? Click here:
https://www.industryarc.com/pdfdownload.php?id=511853

Segmental Analysis:

Compound Harmless Feed Additive Market Segment Analysis – by Additive Type : Based on additive type, the Compound Harmless Feed Additive market is further segmented into antibiotics, vitamins, antioxidants, amino acids, enzymes, mycotoxin detoxifiers, prebiotics, probiotics, flavors and sweeteners, pigments, binder acidifiers and minerals.

Compound Harmless Feed Additive Market Segment Analysis – by Livestock : Based on livestock, the Compound Harmless Feed Additive market is further segmented into pork and swine, poultry, cattle, aquaculture and others. The poultry segment held the largest revenue market share in 2022, owing to the rise in demand for natural poultry feed additives and poultry-based items including meat and eggs.

Compound Harmless Feed Additive Market Segment Analysis – by Geography : Based on geography, the North American Compound Harmless Feed Additive market accounted for 36% of revenue share in 2022, due to the rising demand and consumption of meat in the region.

Competitive Landscape:

The top 5 players in the Compound Harmless Feed Additive Industry are -

1. BASF SE
2. Koninklijke DSM N.V.
3. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
4. Bluestar Adisseo
5. DeKalb Feeds Inc.

Click on the following link to buy the Compound Harmless Feed Additive Market Report:
https://www.industryarc.com/reports/request-quote?id=511853

Why Choose IndustryARC?

IndustryARC is one of the leading market research and consulting firms in the world. It produces over 500 unique market reports annually. If you are looking for a detailed overview of a particular market, you can simply connect with the team at IndustryARC. You can not only buy your preferred market report from the website, but also get personalized assistance on specific reports.

Related Reports:

A. Cattle Feed Market
https://www.industryarc.com/Report/15063/cattle-feed-market.html

B. Animal Probiotics Market
https://www.industryarc.com/Report/18555/animal-probiotics-market.html

Contact Us:

Mr. Venkat Reddy
IndustryARC
Email: venkat@industryarc.com, sales@industryarc.com
USA: (+1) 970-236-3677, (+1) 815-656-4596
IND: (+91) 40-485-49062

Venkat Reddy
IndustryARC
+1 614-588-8538
venkat@industryarc.com
Visit us on social media:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Lactic Acid Bacillus B4 is a probiotic additive used in salmon farming to improve fish growth and immunity.

Title:

Content: Yogurt is amazing! Feeding Wu Guo to eat for 2 months, the fisherman smiles and wears a helmet: anti-collision
▲ The water laboratory said that in recent years, due to climate change, the unusually high temperature in the summer, it is easy to cause the fish to be attacked by germs. (Photo by reporter Yang Chih-hing)
Journalist Hsu Chien-yi / reporting from Taipei
In recent years, the unusually high temperature in summer has led to the outbreak of germs, which has caused great losses to farmers. The probiotic Lactic Acid Bacillus B4, which helps to improve fish growth and enhance their immunity, and its glucan product Lactic Acid Bacillus B4 functional yogurt was added to the feed. Farming time to reduce the risk of breeding.
The water laboratory pointed out that glucan can be used as an emulsifier and thickener flavor carrier in food processing. In terms of health care, research shows that glucan can be used as a prebiotic to increase the number of probiotics - bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria in the body, and regulate immunity.
As mentioned in the water test, lactic acid bacteria B4, previously screened from the gut of perch fish, is a probiotic with special enzymes. Adding cheap sucrose can promote the production of glucan by lactic acid bacteria B4, and developed functional yogurt and ice cream containing glucan with lactic acid bacteria B4.
[Advertisement] Please continue reading...
According to the water test, the literature points out that probiotics or prebiotics such as glycans and oligosaccharides as feed additives can effectively improve the growth and immunity of fish and shrimp. The combined use of probiotics and prebiotics is usually higher than the combined effect of the two alone. Probiotics that produce pathogens can also produce glucans themselves, so the lactobacillus B4 yogurt is applied to aquaculture.
Experimental studies show that the addition of lactic acid bacteria B4 yogurt in the feed helps to improve the growth and resistance to pathogens.
▲ The feed in the test tank is evenly mixed with lactic acid bacteria B4 yogurt and the feed by an electric mixer.
(Photo / Supplied by Aquatic Research Institute)
In recent years, due to climate change, the unusually high temperature in summer can easily lead to the outbreak of germs, causing the death of fish and loss of farmers. Three years ago, the Kaohsiung City Animal Protection Department sought technical assistance from the water laboratory. 4 Yogurt feed for 2 months, fish feeding conditions are better than the control pond, growth is very fast, at the end of May harvest, no disease, fish average weight 570 grams, strong and healthy.
When the fish are harvested, the fisherman must wear a safety helmet to avoid being injured by the energetic Wu Kuo. The fish in the control pond eat worse than the test pond and grow more slowly. In mid-June, the fish suffered from streptococcus disease. It must be treated with drugs. The average weight is 467 grams, which is much lower than the average. Test pool.
The water laboratory further stressed that in order to understand whether the feed containing lactic acid bacteria B4 yogurt can really survive the cool summer, and the Kaohsiung Municipal Bureau of Animal Protection specially arranged the test in the summer the previous year. The results showed that although the test group and the control group of the fish containing lactic acid bacteria B4 yogurt were all suffering from streptococcal disease, the test group were milder drug. The treatment only takes 3 days to heal, and the control group is more serious, requiring more than 7 days of drug treatment.
Therefore, the addition of lactic acid bacteria B4 yogurt in broccoli feed helps to improve the growth and health of the fish, shortens the breeding time, reduces the breeding risk and slows the severity of the disease, and the cost of adding lactic acid bacteria B4 yogurt per kilogram of feed is only about 0.5 yuan.
Share with friends:
※ This article is copyrighted and cannot be reproduced without permission. [ETtoday Copyright Notice]
Related News
Hot News
The best video
And more.
Hot News
Back to the top.

Glucan is a prebiotic used in salmon farming to increase probiotics in the body and regulate immunity.

Insect-based ingredients, such as mealworms, are used as nutritional additives in salmon farming to provide a sustainable alternative to traditional feed sources.

Title:

Content: World’s Largest Insect Farm to Open in France

Once fully operational, the massive vertical farm will produce 200,000 tonnes of insect-based ingredients a year.

Ÿnsect, one of the world’s largest insect rangers, is betting big on bugs to help push the world in a more sustainable direction.

Founded in 2011, the company is fast approaching its goal of opening the world’s largest insect farm and dramatically scaling up its operations. Located about an hour north of Paris, the state-of-the-art facility will leverage automated systems and vertical farming techniques to raise mealworms (Tenebrio molitor) and enable the production of over 200,000 tonnes of insect-based ingredients per year. The site, estimated to be completed by the end of 2022, will join two other Ÿnsect facilities already operational in France and the Netherlands.

"It’s an automated warehouse, very similar to an Amazon warehouse, where instead of storing stuff, we are storing live insects," Ÿnsect CEO and co-founder Antoine Hubert told Time last year. "There is a climate-control system which is highly complex to maintain temperature and moisture from zero to 30 meters high. All operations are automated. Anything that you do on [an insect] farm is done with robots."

Feed for Fish, Fertilizer for Plants, Burgers for Humans

For the past decade, mealworms cultivated at Ÿnsect’s farms have been turned into powders and oils that have become nutritional additives to pet and farm feeds. Thanks to a ruling last year by the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) that deemed mealworms safe for human consumption, the company has also begun selling its powders for shakes, cereal bars, pasta, and even alt-meat burgers. In addition, the shed shells of the rapidly growing mealworms are collected and sold as beneficial organic fertilizers to farmers.

According to MealFlour, a project that promotes mealworm farming as a way to battle malnutrition in Guatemala, a serving of mealworm powder is 55% protein, contains all essential amino and fatty acids, and has more iron than sirloin beef. Compared to the production of milk, pork, chicken, and beef, mealworms are also more sustainable and require fewer resources and energy.

While its recent forays into human foodstuffs have garnered attention, Ÿnsect's focus presently remains on helping to feed sustainably the animals that feed the world. For instance, aquaculture, like salmon farming, is a resource-intensive operation that uses both land-based crops (soy) and massive amounts of wild-caught fish to create what's known as fishmeal. With food production projected to have to grow by more than 70% by 2050 to meet demand, the overfishing of oceans to feed aquaculture operations is not a feasible option. Studies, such as a recent trial by NOAA, have shown that supplementing or even replacing fishmeal with insect- and plant-based foods holds promise for eliminating the need for wild-caught sources. According to Hubert, there are other positives as well.

"They [salmon] were reaching the maturity stage faster and eating less so they were avoiding a large quantity of feed," he told Fast Company in 2020. "There was less mortality so the farmers get more fish eventually than before... This also explains why we have a carbon-negative balance, because we are avoiding so many quantities of inputs to feed fish to have the same quantities of fish."

Hubert added to Fast Company that Ÿnsect has contracts worth more than $100 million with fish feed producers. This past year, with the acquisition of U.S.-based mealworm producer Jord, it also began entering new markets, such as the rapidly growing U.S. backyard chicken feed market.

A Record-Breaking Vertical Farm

One look at the animated video of Ÿnsect’s new facility up above and you can see why it’s been touted as an automated marvel. Mealworms will be reared by robots in stacked tubs stretching several stories tall. Unlike other insect food alternatives such as flies or crickets, mealworms do not hop or fly, allowing the company to maximize the space available.

In an effort to make sure the creatures are ethically farmed, Hubert reached out to philosophers from the Sorbonne University to judge their welfare. As he told The Guardian, the students determined that the mealworms had "more in common with mushroom-growing and hothousing vegetables" than with livestock.

"They have no brain in the strict sense of the word," he said. "We know they have a reflex reaction and they communicate and build intelligent structures, but nobody has shown they feel anything. However, what is important is to respect them as living organisms, which we do."

In addition to the new farm in France, Ÿnsect plans to continue to scale its operations with additional facilities, including a major site in the U.S. The biggest hurdle ahead, however, says Hubert, is making insects a normal part of everyday diets.

"I believe that the big challenge is accepting insects as part of the human diet," he told Authority Magazine. "A large part of the world's population eats insects, but we must be able to prove its properties and its benefits for the environment in order to reach more and have more impact!"

View Article Sources
  1. "Ÿnsect Welcomes European Interministerial Delegation to Amiens." Ynsect.

  2. "Why Eat Mealworms?" MealFlour.

  3. "Edible Insects." Food and Agriculture Organization.

  4. van Dijk, Michiel, et al. "A Meta-Analysis of Projected Global Food Demand and Population At Risk of Hunger for the Period 2010–2050." Nature Food, vol. 2, no. 7, 2021, pp. 494-501., doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00322-9

  5. "The Future of Fish Feed May Lie in Insects, Mold, and Algae." National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

However, the use of additives in salmon farming can also have negative consequences, such as the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the contamination of farmed salmon with toxic chemicals like PCBs.

Title:

Content:
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

trusted source

proofread

Anticipating obsolescence: The next step to enhancing the sustainability of aquaculture

With growing concerns about the environmental toll of single species fish farms, a research project has been looking at the feasibility of introducing a more sustainable and potentially more profitable method of fish farming, using three complementary species.

Much as native American people planted squash, maize and climbing beans together to benefit each other, (often called the "three sisters"), farming finned-fish, shellfish and seaweeds together could benefit each other and reduce any environmental effects of fish farming. Small scale integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA), as the system is called, has traditionally been used at a small domestic scale in Asia, providing the farmer with more than one product to sell or use.

The feasibility study conducted by Bangor University and published in Ecological Modelling has identified the locations around the Atlantic coast which would be most suitable for IMTA, based on farming salmon, and Oarweed, a type of kelp seaweed commonly found in temperate Atlantic coasts. The research considered the natural distribution of the three species, whether suitable locations clashed with busy shipping lanes or marine protected areas and whether there was close access to sizeable ports in order to reach markets.

The western coast of Lewis in the Outer Hebrides, Scotland; Lough Swilly in County Donegal, Ireland, and the western coast of Brittany, northwest France were found to be the best locations to further develop IMTA based aquaculture.

As Conchúr Hughes of Bangor University's School of Ocean Sciences explained, "One of the problems with the type of single species aquaculture practiced in Europe is that excess food and feces can lead to deterioration of local ecology, while density can mean that aquaculture companies need to use antibiotics and other additives to maintain a healthy fish-stock.

"Mussels are filter feeders, they can be responsible for removing up to 54% of salmon waste materials from the , using it as energy to grow, while the oarweed removes soluble nutrients from the water column. Oarweed can then be farmed to use in a variety of products, from food supplements for human consumption or for fish farms, as a fertilizer or as an ingredient in pharmaceuticals.

"Each of these species complements the other and mitigates against problems."

IMTA-based aquaculture

Both salmon and mussels are important food sources in Europe, and while oarweed is not as yet, this is a sector that is expected to experience a rapid increase in demand in the coming years- and can provide an alternative sustainable source of fertilizer and other products.

Seaweed cultivation can also provide environmental benefits. The seaweed in the water acts as a buffer against as it approaches the shore, reducing the energy as it passes through the seaweed, much as trees act as a buffer against strong winds, which can help reduce erosion. It also elevates the pH and oxygenates the water.

More information: Conchúr Hughes et al, Habitat suitability modelling for an integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) system along Europe's Atlantic coast, Ecological Modelling (2023). DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110459

Provided by Bangor University

Citation: Anticipating obsolescence: The next step to enhancing the sustainability of aquaculture (2023, September 27) retrieved 27 September 2023 from https://phys.org/news/2023-09-obsolescence-sustainability-aquaculture.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

How the humble sea cucumber could transform fish farming

0 shares

Feedback to editors

What has the release of Netflix's ecological crisis documentary "Seaspiracy"  exposed?

The pollution risks associated with antibiotics used in sea-farmed salmon.

What health concerns are there specifically related to additives in farmed salmon feed?

The use of non-heat-treated residues in fish feed can transfer Salmonella and Escherichia coli, posing health risks to humans.

Title:

Content: Detecting 6 fish pores in Hama that feed its fish with waste that leads to carcinogenic diseases
13-04-2023
Detecting 6 fish pores in Hama that feed its fish with waste that leads to carcinogenic diseases
The Director of Internal Trade and Consumer Protection in Hama Riad Zeyoud revealed the seizure of 6 fish feeds farmed fish harmful to humans when eating them.
Zeyoud explained that three fish were seized in the Kazuo Valley, providing the fish of breeding with non-heat-treated residues, which may transfer the spores of Salmonella and Escherichia coli, which cause various diseases and health problems to humans when eaten by the consumer who buys and feeds those fish.
In the same context, the head of the Consumer Protection Department in Hama, Dr. Jaafar Al-Safaf, pointed out that a fourth fish was seized in the same area in violation of feeding the fish, the waste of chicken slaughterhouses that are not heat-treated, pointing out that these fish were not confiscated because they could not be transported and are in the process of growth.
Al-Safaf also pointed out in the same context that the seizure of the Shorouk fish in the Kazuo Valley was also in violation of feeding the waste of the chicken slaughterhouses without heat treatment, with the amount of one and a half tons of catfish, and the owner was fined a total value of 12 million Syrian pounds, in addition to organizing the seizure of Aboud fish in the same area and the type of the violation. Syrian pound.
After communicating with the veterinarian Bilal Ismail, he pointed out that the food mentioned (the waste of broiler slaughterhouses) provided to fish is for obtaining animal protein, which works to increase the food conversion within a short period, but when resorting to this method must be subjected to microbial and viral surveillance, without which may lead to common diseases between fish and consumers (chronic or carcinogenic diseases).
He added that these residues, if their bacterial virulence is large, may lead to the occurrence of the breeder in large economic losses on the one hand, and on the other hand will be a health disaster transmitted to human consumers even if the disease is controlled through the use of antibiotics after trespassing with waste, and known fish that are given these residues by their meat and feeling unpalatable to human consumption.
Trace.

Untreated residues can cause economic losses for breeders and health disasters, highlighting the need for proper treatment and regulation.

Regulatory agencies, such as those in Taiwan and China, monitor the use of additives in salmon farming and impose fines and penalties for non-compliance.

Title:

Content: "No illegal drugs found" in 15 fish farms: AFCD will examine production and marketing links
▲ The Fisheries Department said that no illegal drugs were used in tracing 15 other grouper farms. (Photo / courtesy of the Council of Agriculture)
Journalist Hsu Chien-yi / reporting from Taipei
On December 30 last year, the General Administration of Customs of the People 's Republic of China reported that Taiwan' s two batches of grouper fish were found to be peacock green and crystal purple. Better health and safety.
In order to thoroughly trace the origin of the fish, the mainland has cooperated with the local government to carry out movement control, and conducted spot checks on various breeding grounds to test fish bodies such as peacock green, crystal purple, tetracycline (tetracycline), etc. In addition, considering environmental factors, the fish ponds in the bottom of the earth were also supplemented with subsoil and pool water to be tested for peacock green and crystal purple.
[Advertisement] Please continue reading...
The fishery department said that the fish is a very important aquaculture industry in Taiwan. Both the fishery industry and the domestic aquaculture industry attach great importance to the quality and health and safety of the fish.
In addition, the Fisheries Department is scheduled to invite professional scholars and representatives of industry and ecology familiar with the industry to hold a relevant meeting on January 26. The departments of the quarantine system will also conduct the correct drug use promotion at the production site. National Fish Quality.
In order to ensure the safety of fish, Taiwan's aquaculture fish are monitored before they go on the market, and will continue to do so in the future.
Share with friends:
※ This article is copyrighted and cannot be reproduced without permission. [ETtoday Copyright Notice]
Related News
Hot News
The best video
And more.
Hot News
Back to the top.

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning antibiotics in farmes salmon?

In Canada, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans regulates salmon farming, including the use of additives, and requires fish farms to have a sea lice management plan.

Title:

Content: Skip to Content

Drug-resistant sea lice an increasing problem for B.C. fish farms, new study finds

By Melanie Nagy

Click here for updates on this story

    May 14, 2022 (CTV Network) — Every spring, endangered juvenile wild salmon migrate from B.C.’s rivers to the Pacific Ocean, but their numbers are dwindling and some fear sea lice parasites are increasingly to blame. Sea lice are tiny, oval shaped crustaceans that can cling to the backs of wild salmon, feeding on their skin, muscle tissue and blood. Adult fish are generally not harmed when a few lice attach themselves, but juveniles with underdeveloped scales can be harmed or killed when heavily infested. While the parasite occurs naturally in the waters off B.C.’s coast, there’s long been concern over outbreaks on aquaculture farms where open-net pens make it possible for lice to move from farmed fish to young migrating salmon. “Salmon farms act as this year-round reservoir for sea lice, potentially providing sea lice to wild juvenile salmon when they wouldn’t normally get them,” conservation biologist Sean Godwin said. Godwin is the lead author in a recent study that looked at the state of sea lice in the Pacific Ocean. Along with his fellow researchers, he found the parasite is increasingly becoming resistant to one of the main tools the industry relies on to combat the problem. “Our paper found that this tool, which is a pesticide known [as] SLICE, or emamectin benzoate, is becoming less effective and that sea lice are developing resistance to it on farms here,” Godwin said. To assess parasite resistance, “bioassay, treatment and salmon-louse count data from 2010 to 2021” were analyzed. During that time, the researchers found a notable decrease in the effectiveness of SLICE. “It is going to be more difficult for salmon farms to control sea lice outbreaks on their farms,” said Godwin. In the province’s stunning Clayoquot Sound, Bonny Glambeck routinely uses a fine-mesh net and a sample cup to test the waters near fish farms. Glambeck heads the Tofino-based conservation society known as Clayoquot Action and every year she monitors industry lice counts and tracks wild salmon infestations. “The control of sea lice on fish farms is something I do not believe the industry has ever been able to crack,” she said. “Parasites like these sea lice proliferate on these farms and then they can pass them on to wild salmon. With that, we feel that every year that goes by and these farms are allowed to pollute the waters with these infestations, they are just wiping out another generation of wild salmon.” Fisheries and Oceans Canada requires all fish farms in Canadian coastal waters to have a sea lice management plan. The federal department also places a limit of three lice per salmon during the spring when young salmon are out-migrating and are most vulnerable. In addition to that, the industry publicly reports lice counts on individual company websites every month. “The worry is that those lice levels might accumulate and then be released back to affect wild migratory salmon. The science doesn’t support that, but the concern exists so the industry responds to that,” said Brian Kingzett. Kingzett is the science and policy director with the BC Salmon Farmers Association. He says the industry has warned the federal government for years about the waning efficacy of SLICE, and has long called on Ottawa to approve new pesticide options. “There are other anti-parasite agents that have been approved in other areas of the world and we would certainly like to add that to our toolbox.” While SLICE is the only approved pesticide in Canada, it is not the only option for a fish farm struggling with a lice infestation. Kingzett says other environmentally friendly methods include the use of specialized delousing boats. One readily used vessel can suck fish from ocean-based pens into tanks where pressurized water is used to forcibly remove any attached lice. According to the industry, any dislodged bugs are collected by filters for disposal so they are not reintroduced to the marine environment. “During the last five years, the industry has spent about $100 million on importing new technologies,” Kingzett said. “Fish farming is an important industry in B.C. because we are facing a global seafood shortage and the farming sector is looking to provide sustainable, high-quality product.” The industry, however, is controversial and there’s been an ongoing battle to have all fish farms in the province removed. Earlier this month, there was a large protest in Tofino involving Indigenous leaders, conservationists and environmentalists. The group took to the waters near a local fish farm to voice their opposition to the industry and call on Ottawa to evict them. “It is a do-or-die moment for the salmon farming industry,” said Alexandra Morton, who is an independent biologist and longtime wild salmon activist. “We need to do whatever we can to save wild salmon populations because they are sadly on the verge of extinction.” In response, those in support of fish farms argue they are not a direct threat to wild salmon and are a vital industry. According to the BC Salmon Farmers Association, there are nearly 5,000 jobs linked to fish farms and at least $1 billion “in economic activity” is generated annually. Despite that, Ottawa has previously announced that it’s committed to phasing out open-net salmon farms in B.C. by 2025. In addition, it’s uncertain if 79 federal fish farm licenses expiring in June will be renewed.

Please note: This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.

Matthew Talbot
matthew.talbot@bellmedia.ca

CNN Newsource

Skip to content

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning antibiotics in farmes salmon?

The European Food Safety Agency has deemed mealworms safe for human consumption, providing a potential alternative to traditional additives.

The FDA monitors seafood imports for banned antibiotics and additives, and refuses contaminated products from several countries.

Title:

Content: FDA Adds Nekkanti Sea Foods to Import Alert on Nitrofurans; Refuses Shrimp Contaminated with Banned Antibiotics from Five Different Countries in April

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published detailed data regarding 107 total seafood entry line refusals in April, of which eight (7.5%) were of shrimp for reasons related to banned antibiotics.

Over the first four months of this year, the FDA has refused a total of 31 entry lines of shrimp for reasons related to banned antibiotics, putting the agency on pace for a total of 93 shrimp entry line refusals for veterinary drug residues in 2022, which would be the most for a year since 2016.

The eight shrimp entry lines refused in April were for shipments from five different companies in Bangladesh, China, Hong Kong, India, and Malaysia:

·     Gemini Sea Food, Ltd. (Bangladesh), a company that is currently listed on Import Alert 16-129 (“Detention Without Physical Examination of Seafood Products Due to Nitrofurans”) as of November 15, 2021, had two entry lines refused for shrimp contaminated with nitrofurans and veterinary drug residues by the Division of Northeast Imports on April 14, 2022 and one entry line refused for shrimp contaminated with nitrofurans and veterinary drug residues by the Division of Northeast Imports on April 19, 2022;

·     Mr. Fang’s Store (Putian) Green Food Co., Ltd. (China), a company that is not on the green list of Import Alert 16-131 (“Detention Without Physical Examination of Aquacultured, Shrimp, Dace, and Eel from China – Presence of New Animal Drugs and/or Unsafe Food Additives”), had one entry line refused for shrimp contaminated with veterinary drug residues and unsafe additives by the Division of West Coast Imports on April 5, 2021;

·     Wing Cheong Marine Product (Hong Kong), a company that is not currently listed on Import Alert 16-124 (“Detention Without Physical Examination of Aquaculture Seafood Products Due to Unapproved Drugs”), Import Alert 16-127 (“Detention Without Physical Examination of Crustaceans Due to Chloramphenicol”), or Import Alert 16-129 (“Detention Without Physical Examination of Seafood Products Due to Nitrofurans”), had one entry line refused for shrimp contaminated with veterinary drug residues and unsafe additives by the Division of West Coast Imports on April 28, 2022;

·     Nekkanti Sea Foods Limited (India), a company that is currently listed on Import Alert 16-129 (“Detention Without Physical Examination of Seafood Products Due to Nitrofurans”) as of May 3, 2022, had one entry line refused for shrimp contaminated with veterinary drug residues by the Division of Northeast Imports on April 21, 2022; and

·     EB Frozen Food Sdn. Bhd. (Malaysia), a company located in peninsular Malaysia that is not on the green list of Import Alert 16-136 (“Detention Without Physical Examination of Aquacultured Shrimp and Prawns from Peninsular Malaysia Due to Presence of Drug Residues from Unapproved Animal Drugs or the Presence of Unsafe Food Additives”), had two entry line refused for shrimp contaminated with veterinary drug residues and unsafe additives by the Division of West Coast Imports on April 14, 2022.

In addition to these shipments, the FDA also refused another twelve entry lines of shrimp for the presence of salmonella and another four entry lines of shrimp for being filthy.

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning antibiotics in farmes salmon?

China has a National Aquatic Products Veterinary Drug Residues Monitoring Plan, which supervises veterinary drugs and other inputs for aquaculture.

Title:

Content: People 's Daily Online > > Economy and Technology
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs: In the first half of 2023, the pass rate of veterinary drug residue monitoring of aquatic products in China is 99.2%.
08 / 09 / 2023 14: 07 | Source: People's Daily Online
Small number
Beijing, August 9 (Reporter Li Dong) Recently, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs released the monitoring of veterinary drug residues of aquatic products in the first half of 2023.
The monitoring results show that in the first half of 2023, the qualified rate of veterinary drug residue monitoring of aquatic products in China is 99.2%, and the qualified rate of veterinary drug residue monitoring of aquatic products in China is continuously stable at more than 99%.
From the sampling of species, the yellow fish, turbot, flounder, rainbow trout, floral perch, spotted catfish, prawns and clayfish are all qualified.
In March this year, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs launched the implementation of the 2023 National Aquatic Products Veterinary Drug Residues Monitoring Plan and the 2023 National Aquatic Animal Disease Monitoring Plan to deploy the supervision of veterinary drugs and other inputs for aquaculture in 2023 and the prevention and control of aquatic animal diseases.
According to the relevant person in charge of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, according to the plan, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs monitors the residual status of aquatic veterinary drugs in 31 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government), four planned cities and Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, and investigates the hidden safety risks of so-called "non-pharmaceutical" "" and other unapproved inputs for aquaculture.
"At the same time, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs will also carry out special monitoring of 11 aquatic animal diseases in 30 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government) and the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, investigate three aquatic animal diseases and carry out research on grass carp related diseases," the person said.
"In the next step, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs will strengthen the supervision and law enforcement of key varieties and key drugs according to the monitoring results, strengthen training and publicity and guidance on the popularization of drug related knowledge, and guide all localities to further implement the local responsibility, supervision responsibility and the main responsibility of producers and operators.
(Editor: Qiao Yiqiong, Gao Lei)
Public Number ： People 's Network Finance
Share it so more people can see it.
Back to top

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning antibiotics in farmes salmon?

The Ministry of Agriculture in China monitors veterinary drug residues in aquatic products, including salmon, and has a 99.9% pass rate of veterinary drug residue monitoring.

Title:

Content: People 's Daily Online > > Economy and Technology
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs: In 2021, the pass rate of veterinary drug residue monitoring and sampling of aquatic products from national origin was 99.9%.
December 30, 2021 14: 29 | Source: People's Daily Online
Small number
Beijing, December 30 (Reporter Li Nanhua) According to the website of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, a few days ago, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs released the status of veterinary drug residue monitoring in national production areas in 2021, and the pass rate of veterinary drug residue monitoring in national production areas was 99.9%, up 0.8 percentage points year-on-year.
Among them, the pass rate of 35 aquatic products such as tilapia and prawns reached 100%, and the quality and safety level of aquaculture aquatic products continued to be good.
According to the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, in March this year, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs launched the "2021 Veterinary Drug Residues Monitoring Plan for Aquatic Products in National Production Areas", and organized local agricultural and rural (fishery) departments and relevant aquatic product quality inspection institutions to randomly select 81,500 batches of aquatic products in breeding areas to test seven banned (stop) drug indicators. And...
The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs has instructed relevant provinces to investigate and punish cases of illegal use of banned drugs according to law.
The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs requires all localities to continue to pay close attention to the supervision of inputs used in aquaculture, severely crack down on illegal activities in all aspects, do a good job of guiding the use of aquaculture standardized drugs, effectively prevent and control the hidden dangers of quality and safety, and make every effort to ensure the safety of aquatic products.
(Editor: Li Nanhua, Lu Qian)
Share it so more people can see it.
Back to top

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning antibiotics in farmes salmon?

Overall, the use of additives in salmon farming is a complex issue, with both benefits and drawbacks, and more research is needed to fully understand the impacts on human health and the environment.

Title:

Content: Successfully registered!
Please go through the link provided in the body of the e-mail message
Eating too much “farm salmon ” can cause cancer
© Fotolia / Deyan GeorgievFresh salmon in store
Follow us via
A new medical study has revealed the risks of overeating salmon raised in farm ponds, confirming that it can lead to cancer.
According to a study by the US Environmental Defense Fund, eating salmon raised in farm ponds on a regular basis may increase the risk of cancer after multiple cases of contamination have been detected in the US and other countries.
"Risk analysis suggests that consumption of farmed Atlantic salmon may pose health risks that detract from the beneficial effects of fish consumption," the study said.
"Medical scientific findings, published in the Journal of Medical Sciences, suggest that cheap farmed salmon sold in stores may do more harm than good."
Eating farmed salmon more than once a month may be enough to increase the risk of cancer.
"In multivariate analyses, men with the highest concentrations of PCBs were twice as likely to develop prostate cancer than men with the lowest concentrations."
News Ticker
0.
New first, old first.
loader
To participate in the discussion
Sign in or Register
loader
Conversations
Заголовок открываемого материала

Standards and regulations governing the use of additives in salmon farming vary by country, with some countries having stricter regulations than others.

Title:

Content: DUBLIN, March 9, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- The "Global Salmon Market, By Species, By Fish Type, By Distribution Channel, By Product Type, Estimation & Forecast, 2017 - 2027" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The global salmon market held a market value of USD 20,880.5 Million in 2021 and is projected to reach USD 27,344.0 Million by the year 2027. The market is anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 4.6% from 2022 to 2027. Approximately, 3,282.72 kilo tons of salmon was estimated to be sold in 2021.

Salmon is a common name for a Salmonidae family's species of the ray-finned fish. The market is expected to be driven by the rising prevalence of chronic conditions and global rise in penetration of e-commerce sector. Furthermore, rise in consumer awareness towards the health benefits of salmon are also expected to contribute to the market growth.

Despite the driving factors, depletion of sea species are anticipated to hinder the market growth. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the market was negatively impacted due to closure of fishing activities and hence, decrease in the supply of salmon in global markets.

Growth Influencers:

Rise in consumer awareness towards the health benefits of salmon

Salmon provides various health benefits. It is rich in Omega-3 fatty acids, is a great source of protein, high in Vitamin B, good source of potassium, loaded with selenium, contains astaxanthin, reduced the risk of heart diseases, helps in weight management, helps to fight inflammation, and protects brain health. Consumers are getting aware regarding all these benefits, which is increasing its adoption, hence boosting the market growth.

Competitive Landscape

Major players in the global salmon market include Cermaq Group ASA, Leroy Seafood Group ASA, Mowi ASA, SalMar ASA, AquaChile, Cooke Aquaculture, Bakkafrost, Grieg Seafood, Multiexport, Blumar, Salmones Camanchaca, Australis Seafoods, Nova Sea, Tassal Group, Sinkaberg-Hansen, Nordlaks, Bremnes Seashore, Norway Royal Salmon, Alsaker Fjordbruk, and Other Prominent Players.

These market players are involved in collaborations, mergers & acquisitions, and new product launches, among other initiatives, to strengthen their market presence. For instance, in January 2022, Benchmark Animal Health and Cermaq received funding from the Research Council of Norway for research and development of Tenacibaculum vaccines for Salmon. Furthermore, Bekkafrost collaborated with the salmon industry through the Faroe Fish Farmer's Association And Global Salmon Initiative (GSI).

The global Salmon market report provides insights on the below pointers:

  • Market Penetration: Provides comprehensive information on the market offered by the prominent players
  • Market Development: The report offers detailed information about lucrative emerging markets and analyzes penetration across mature segments of the markets
  • Market Diversification: Provides in-depth information about untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments
  • Competitive Landscape Assessment: Mergers & acquisitions, certifications, product launches in the global Salmon market have been provided in this research report. In addition, the report also emphasizes the SWOT analysis of the leading players.
  • Product Development & Innovation: The report provides intelligent insights on future technologies, R&D activities, and breakthrough product developments
  • Global Salmon Production: Total Harvest of Atlantic Salmon, 2016-2020
  • Salmon Production Cost Breakdown
  • Consumer Behavior Analysis: By Region, By Age, By Gender, By Annual Household Income, Seasonal of Fish
  • Fresh Salmon Export: Trends & Predictions for the Supply of Salmon Consumed (USD Million) in the United States; Largest Fishing Companies
  • Regulatory Landscape: Section 6 of Norwegian Aquaculture Act , Aquaculture Stewardship Council Salmon standard, RSPCA welfare standards for Farmed Atlantic salmon, A Greener World (AGW), Marine Stewardship Council (MSC)

The global Salmon market report answers questions such as:

  • What is the market size and forecast of the Global Salmon Market?
  • What are the inhibiting factors and impact of COVID-19 on the Global Salmon Market during the assessment period?
  • Which are the products/segments/applications/areas to invest in over the assessment period in the Global Salmon Market?
  • What is the competitive strategic window for opportunities in the Global Salmon Market?
  • What are the technology trends and regulatory frameworks in the Global Salmon Market?
  • What is the market share of the leading players in the Global Salmon Market?
  • What modes and strategic moves are considered favorable for entering the Global Salmon Market?

Key Topics Covered:

Chapter 1. Research Framework

Chapter 2. Executive Summary: Global Salmon Market

Chapter 3. Global Salmon Market Overview

3.1. Industry Value Chain Analysis

3.1.1. Raw Material

3.1.2. Processing and Packaging

3.1.3. Distributor

3.1.4. End User

3.2. Industry Outlook

3.2.1. Global Salmon Production

3.2.2. Salmon Production Cost Breakdown

3.2.3. Fresh Salmon Export

3.2.4. Consumer Behavior Analysis

3.2.4.1. Income

3.2.4.2. Occupation

3.2.4.3. Seasonal of Fish

3.2.5. Trends and Predictions for the Supply of Salmon Consumed in the United States

3.2.6. Largest Fishing Companies

3.3. PESTLE Analysis

3.4. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

3.4.1. Bargaining Power of Suppliers

3.4.2. Bargaining Power of Buyers

3.4.3. Threat of Substitutes

3.4.4. Threat of New Entrants

3.4.5. Degree of Competition

3.5. Market Dynamics and Trends

3.5.1. Key Trends

3.5.2. Growth Drivers

3.5.3. Restraints/ Challenges

3.6. Market Growth and Outlook

3.6.1. Market Revenue Estimates and Forecast (US$ Mn), 2017-2027

3.6.2. Market Volume Estimates and Forecast (MMT), 2017-2027

3.6.3. Pricing Analysis

3.7. Covid-19 Impact Assessment on Market Growth Trend

3.7.1. Growth Trend Shift Analysis

3.7.2. Industry Best Practices

3.8. Regulatory Landscape

Chapter 4. Competition Dashboard

4.1. Market Concentration Rate

4.2. Company Market Share Analysis (Value %), 2020

4.3. Competitor Mapping

Chapter 5. Salmon Market Analysis, By Species

5.1. Key Insights

5.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

5.2.1. Atlantic

5.2.2. Pink

5.2.3. Chum/Dog

5.2.4. Coho

5.2.5. Sockeye

5.2.6. Others

Chapter 6. Salmon Market Analysis, By Fish Type

6.1. Key Insights

6.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

6.2.1. Farmed

6.2.2. Wild

Chapter 7. Salmon Market Analysis, By Product Type

7.1. Key Insights

7.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

7.2.1. Canned

7.2.2. Fresh

7.2.3. Frozen

7.2.4. Others

Chapter 8. Salmon Market Analysis, By Retail

8.1. Key Insights

8.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

8.2.1. Retail

8.2.1.1. E-commerce (online)

8.2.1.2. Brick & Mortar Stores (offline)

8.2.2. HoReCa & Wholesale

8.2.3. Processed Food Industry

8.2.4. Other Institutional Customers

Chapter 9. Salmon Market Analysis, By Region

9.1. Key Insights

9.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

9.2.1. North America

9.2.1.1. The U.S.

9.2.1.2. Canada

9.2.1.3. Mexico

9.2.2. Europe

9.2.2.1. Western Europe

9.2.2.1.1. The UK

9.2.2.1.2. Germany

9.2.2.1.3. France

9.2.2.1.4. Italy

9.2.2.1.5. Spain

9.2.2.1.6. Rest of Western Europe

9.2.2.2. Eastern Europe

9.2.2.2.1. Poland

9.2.2.2.2. Russia

9.2.2.2.3. Rest of Eastern Europe

9.2.3. Asia Pacific

9.2.3.1. China

9.2.3.2. India

9.2.3.3. Japan

9.2.3.4. Australia & New Zealand

9.2.3.5. ASEAN

9.2.3.6. Rest of Asia Pacific

9.2.4. Middle East & Africa

9.2.4.1. UAE

9.2.4.2. Saudi Arabia

9.2.4.3. South Africa

9.2.4.4. Rest of MEA

9.2.5. South America

9.2.5.1. Argentina

9.2.5.2. Brazil

9.2.5.3. Rest of South America

Chapter 10. North America Salmon Market Analysis

10.1. Key Insights

10.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

10.2.1. By Species

10.2.2. By Type

10.2.3. By Product

10.2.4. By Distribution Channel

10.2.5. By Country

Chapter 11. Europe Salmon Market Analysis

11.1. Key Insights

11.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

11.2.1. By Species

11.2.2. By Type

11.2.3. By Product

11.2.4. By Distribution Channel

11.2.5. By Country

Chapter 12. Asia Pacific Salmon Market Analysis

12.1. Key Insights

12.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

12.2.1. By Species

12.2.2. By Type

12.2.3. By Product

12.2.4. By Distribution Channel

12.2.5. By Country

Chapter 13. Middle East and Africa Salmon Market Analysis

13.1. Key Insights

13.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

13.2.1. By Species

13.2.2. By Type

13.2.3. By Product

13.2.4. By Distribution Channel

13.2.5. By Country

Chapter 14. South America Salmon Market Analysis

14.1. Key Insights

14.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

14.2.1. By Species

14.2.2. By Type

14.2.3. By Product

14.2.4. By Distribution Channel

14.2.5. By Country

Chapter 15. Company Profile (Company Overview, Financial Matrix, Key Product landscape, Key Personnel, Key Competitors, Contact Address, and Business Strategy Outlook) *

15.1. Cremaq Group ASA

15.2. Leroy Seafood Group ASA

15.3. Mowi ASA

15.4. SalMar ASA

15.5. AquaChile

15.6. Cooke Aquaculture

15.7. Bakkafrost

15.8. Grieg Seafood

15.9. Multiexport

15.10. Blumar

15.11. Salmones Camanchaca

15.12. Australis Seafoods

15.13. Nova Sea

15.14. Tassal Group

15.15. Sinkaberg-Hansen

15.16. Nordlaks

15.17. Bremnes Seashore

15.18. Norway Royal Salmon

15.19. Alsaker Fjordbruk

15.20. Other Prominent players

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/di479t

Media Contact:

Research and Markets

Laura Wood, Senior Manager

press@researchandmarkets.com

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470

For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630

For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907

Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-salmon-market-to-2027---by-species-fish-type-distribution-channel-product-type-and-region-301498918.html

SOURCE Research and Markets

DISCLAIMER FOR COMMENTS: The views expressed by public comments are not those of this company or its affiliated companies. Please note by clicking on "Post" you acknowledge that you have read the TERMS OF USE and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Your comments may be used on air. Be polite. Inappropriate posts or posts containing offsite links, images, GIFs, inappropriate language, or memes may be removed by the moderator. Job listings and similar posts are likely automated SPAM messages from Facebook and are not placed by WFMZ-TV.

In Norway, the Aquaculture Act regulates salmon farming, including the use of additives, but the specifics of these regulations are not provided.

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

The use of additives in salmon farming is also guided by standardized drug use to ensure aquatic product safety.

Provinces in China investigate and punish cases of illegal banned drug use, and regulatory agencies release lists of food violations for border inspection.

The FDA suspends import applications from non-compliant farms, and regulatory agencies inspect food products for pesticide residue tolerance standards.

Title:

Content: Chinese hairy crabs detected with dioxin over standard food and drug administration suspends import from farm
Journalist Hsu Juo-yin / reporting from Taipei
This (3) afternoon, the Food and Drug Department (FDA) announced that it would suspend the application for import inspection of the farm from China to strengthen source management.
This is an advertisement, please continue reading.
The Food and Drug Department (FEHD) today released a list of food violations for border inspection. Among them, the "live Chinese chestnut crabs" exported from China, commonly known as hairy crabs, are found to be illegal. According to the "Food Containing Dioxin and Polychlorinated Biphenyls", the Dioxin limit is 3.5 pg / g wet weight, and the total amount of Dioxin polychlorinated Biphenyls is 6.5 pg / g wet. However, this batch found that the total content of dioxin 10.4 pg / g wet weight, dioxin and dioxin polychlorinated biphenyls was 10.8 pg / g wet weight, which did not comply with Article 15 of the Food Safety and Health Management Law, and the total weight of 6400 kg was returned or destroyed according to the regulations.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said that considering dioxin pollution as an environmental pollution problem, in order to strengthen the source management of hairy crabs in the mouth, the Dongfangxu Seawater Breeding Farm in Panshan County, registration number: 2100 / AC001, is closed from today.
In addition, the list of violations also see the fresh strawberries exported from Japan, the Food and Drug Administration also mentioned that during the inspection in December 111, Japan's fresh strawberries exported to Taiwan were detected by the border inspection and six batches did not meet Taiwan's "pesticide residue tolerance standards".
This is an advertisement, please continue reading.

China has a strict approval management system for food additives, and only safe and necessary food additives are approved for use.

Title:

Content: Health · Life
Do the "four strictest" to protect food safety (people's health in the ten years)
Our reporter Wang Meihua
July 19, 2022 05: 38 Source: People 's Daily Overseas Edition
On June 29, in Lianyungang, Jiangsu, inspectors were collecting vegetable samples to detect the presence of pesticide residues.
Photo by Zhu Huanan (People 's Vision)
The picture shows that on June 20, the staff of the market supervision and management department of Huaibei City, Anhui Province, inspected the implementation of basic information such as the identity and health status of the food delivery staff, registration, updating and filing at the rider management site of the takeaway enterprise.
Photo by Li Xin (People 's Vision)
People eat for the day, food for peace first.
Food safety is related to everyone's health and life safety, and it must be grasped and tightened.
Since the 18th Party Congress, China's food safety work has made positive progress, and truly achieved "the most rigorous standards, the most stringent supervision, the most severe punishment, the most serious accountability, to ensure the safety of the broad masses of the people" on the tip of the tongue ".
1419 national food safety standards have been issued
Food safety is no small matter, to create the most rigorous food safety standard system, "eat at ease" problem can have a chapter to follow.
Food safety standards are mandatory technical regulations, which are not only the basic compliance of producers and operators, but also an important basis for supervision and law enforcement.
In the past 10 years, the National Health and Health Commission has set up a national standard review committee with nearly 400 experts from 17 departments, adhering to the scientific basis of rigorous risk assessment, and establishing a standard development system with open and transparent procedures, extensive participation of experts in various fields, and evaluation of scientific authority.
Up to now, 1,419 national food safety standards have been issued, including more than 20,000 indicators, covering the main health hazards from farmland to table, from production and processing to the whole chain of products, and all links, to ensure the safety of the diet of the whole population.
The framework of the standard system is not only in line with the dietary structure of Chinese residents, but also in line with international practices.
"The food safety standards and monitoring and evaluation department of the State Health and Health Commission," Liu Jinfeng, director of the food safety standards and monitoring and evaluation department of the State Health and Health Commission, said that the State Health and Health Commission has integrated the enforcement content of food safety standards, food hygiene, specification quality and industry standards, focusing on solving the problem of "a large number of standards, not knowing which to use".
In recent years, in accordance with the requirements of the "most rigorous standards", the National Health Commission has improved the standard development system based on risk monitoring and evaluation.
At present, China's food safety standards system is divided into four categories: general standards, product standards, production and operation norms and inspection methods, covering the entire process from raw materials to the table.
The four categories of standards are linked to each other to control food safety risks from different angles.
Liu Jinfeng said that China has been the chair of the International Codex Committee on Food Additives and Pesticide Residues for 15 consecutive years, taking the lead in coordinating the food standards work of the Asian Codex Committee, and playing a positive role in the development and exchange of international and regional food safety standards.
Monitoring of food contamination and harmful factors in 99% of counties
Let the people eat at ease, food safety risk monitoring and evaluation is the "gatekeeper".
According to Li Ning, director of the National Food Safety Risk Assessment Center, after more than ten years of organizing and implementing the national food safety risk monitoring and evaluation, it has initially grasped the status and trend of major food contamination in China, and basically grasped the trend and pathogenesis of major foodborne diseases in different regions and seasons.
"For example, poisonous mushroom poisoning occurs mainly in some areas in the south.
In recent years, local governments have strengthened risk warnings in areas with high incidence of poisoning, and increased targeted popularizing propaganda such as consumers not taking or eating wild mushrooms, which has significantly reduced the number of cases and deaths of toxic mushroom poisoning.
At present, China has established two major monitoring networks at the national, provincial, municipal and county levels for monitoring food pollution and harmful factors, and for monitoring foodborne diseases, as well as a national food safety risk assessment system.
The monitoring of food pollution and harmful factors has covered 99% of counties and districts, and the monitoring of foodborne diseases has covered more than 70,000 medical institutions at all levels.
Food Contaminants and Harmful Factors Monitoring Food categories cover all 32 categories of food such as cereals and oils, fruits and vegetables, eggs and milk, meat and poultry, and aquatic products that are consumed daily by residents.
"These measures make important food safety hazards more sensitive to identification and early warning, not only for the development of standards to provide a scientific basis, but also for the orderly development of industry norms and protection of public health to provide strong support." Liu Jinfeng said.
In recent years, the take-away delivery business has developed rapidly, the network catering service has gradually increased, and its food safety problems have been widely concerned.
"From the point of view of food safety, whether it is takeout or food, online shopping or physical store purchase, the safety requirements for food are the same," Liu said.
Takeaway and online food manufacturers and operators should strictly abide by relevant laws and regulations and standards, strengthen the management of production, storage, transportation and distribution, and jointly maintain the "tongue safety" of consumers.
Strict Approval Management System for Food Additives
Food additives can improve the quality and color, smell and taste of food, and play an important role in preventing food spoilage.
But many people have doubts about food additives - can you eat them?
"The development of the food industry is inseparable from food additives, such as colorants used to improve food color, preservatives used to prevent food corruption, and coagulants used in brine point tofu, which are food additives."
It is the existence of food additives that makes the production, storage, transportation and circulation of food normal, and all kinds of food in supermarkets can be so colorful. Li Ning said that China has adopted a strict approval management system for the use of food additives, and only food additives that are technically necessary and safe and reliable will be approved for use.
Even if the safety is guaranteed, the process is not necessary and the use will not be approved.
China has strict regulations on what kinds of food additives can be used in and how much is used; there are also strict requirements for the management, labeling, and production licensing of food additives.
As long as the food additives that meet the requirements of the standard are used in accordance with the scope and amount of use of the standard, they are safe.
Some consumers are worried that the daily intake of multiple foods contains the same food additive, whether it will exceed the standard and bring extra burden to the body.
In this regard, Li Ning said that when the National Health and Health Commission formulated the scope of use and dosage of each food additive in food, it has fully considered the situation that consumers may consume a variety of foods containing the same additive in a day.
"As long as the production enterprises strictly follow the standards of food additives to use, food is qualified, consumers do not need to worry about additives on the health of additional burden." Li Ning said, suggesting that consumers in the dietary pattern of reasonable matching, balanced meals, in accordance with the Chinese dietary guidelines recommended dietary patterns, eat healthier and more nutritious.
(Editor: Yang Guangyu, Hu Yongqiu)
Related News

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

Regulatory agencies in Chile, such as the Superintendencia del Medio Ambiente, can impose fines and revoke permits for non-compliance with environmental regulations.

Title:

Content: Embattled Chilean salmon producer Nova Austral will have to pay fines totaling $947,654 (€874,275) for damaging the seabed at one of its production sites following an appeals court ruling this week, Chile's environmental authority, the Superintendencia del Medio Ambiente (SMA) said.

The fine was originally handed down in July 2022 after SMA alleged the seabed had been altered at the Aracena 14 production site in the Magallanes region of southern Chile.

That same month the company had permits revoked at other production sites after repeated instances of overproduction were found to have caused environmental damage in the Alberto de Agostini National Park, Magallanes Region.

In the EU, regulatory agencies investigate antitrust breaches and monitor the use of additives in salmon farming.

Title:

Content: SALM

EU says Norwegian salmon producers might have distorted competition

Credit: REUTERS/SERGEI KARPUKHIN

Adds company responses and share price reaction

Jan 25 (Reuters) - The European Commission has informed six Norwegian salmon producers of its suspicion that they breached EU antitrust rules by distorting competition for spot sales of Norwegian farmed Atlantic salmon in the EU, it said on Thursday.

The Commission said it was concerned that Cermaq, Grieg Seafood GSFG.OL, Bremnes, Leroy LSG.OL, Mowi MOWI.OL and SalMar SALM.OL had exchanged commercially sensitive information about prices and volumes between 2011 and 2019 to reduce market uncertainty.

Mowi, SalMar, Leroy and Grieg Seafood issued statements contesting the Commission's preliminary findings, maintaining their commitment to competition laws and expressing their intention to cooperate with the investigation.

Cermaq said it explicitly disagreed with the Commission's preliminary findings but will refrain from further comment until watchdog's final decision.

A Bremnes representative was not immediately available for comment.

Shares in Mowi, SalMar, Leroy and Grieg Seafood fell 4.9%, 1.9%, 5.7% and 7.1% respectively after the Commission announcement.

Antitrust regulators raided salmon farms in several European Union countries in February 2019, including some owned by Mowi, on suspicions of involvement in a cartel.

The Commission did not name the companies at the time. But Mowi, the world's biggest producer of farmed Atlantic salmon, said that EU regulators had raided two of its businesses, in Scotland and the Netherlands.

Norway accounts for more than half of the farmed Atlantic salmon worldwide and the EU is its main importer.

The alleged conduct concerns sales of fresh, whole and gutted Atlantic salmon farmed in Norway. It does not concern frozen farmed Atlantic salmon or processed products such as salmon fillets, loins or smoked salmon, the commission said.

The statement of objections sent to the companies does not prejudge the outcome of an investigation, it added.

(Reporting by Bart Meijer additional reporting by Jesus Calero Editing by David Goodman )

((Bart.Meijer@thomsonreuters.com;))

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

Tags

More Related Articles

This data feed is not available at this time.

Sign up for Smart Investing to get the latest news, strategies and tips to help you invest smarter.

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning antibiotics in farmes salmon?

The EU is the main importer of Norwegian farmed Atlantic salmon, and regulatory agencies take measures to ensure compliance with additive use standards.

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning antibiotics in farmes salmon?

Meetings are held with industry experts to promote correct drug use, and regulatory agencies conduct spot checks on breeding grounds.

The National Authority monitors foodstuffs and agricultural inputs, and ensures conformity with international quality standards.

Title:

Content: Ministry of Health set up joint committee of four ministries to support food safety in Tunisia
The National Authority for Health Safety of Food Products organized a national symposium on "Quality systems and management of risks associated with food contamination" on Tuesday in Tunis, on the occasion of the fifth World Food Safety Day on June 7 of each year, which is organized this year under the theme "Food Standards Save Lives".
The Ministry of Health is working to establish a joint committee between four ministries, namely health, agriculture, trade and environment, in order to further support the safety of food and animal products, announced Minister of Health Ali Al-Murabit during this regular seminar in cooperation with the World Health Organization (WHO).
"..."
The minister explained that this joint committee will enable the unification of the interventions of all parties concerned with food products and the implementation of several joint projects, in order to ensure the availability of health safety conditions for food in Tunisia and its conformity with international standards of quality and health and to support export opportunities to international markets.
The topics of this symposium focused in particular on the legal and institutional framework for food health safety, in addition to the importance of regulations and specifications related to food health safety, as well as the role assigned to quality systems in controlling the risks associated with food contamination.
The Director General of the National Authority for Health Safety of Food Products, Mohammed Al-Rabhi, said in a press statement on the sidelines of this symposium that the Authority undertakes major tasks directly related to the health of the citizen and the national food security and the economy of the country and its main goal is to focus prevention and control in all states of the Republic.
Established in 2019 under Law No. 25 on the health safety of foodstuffs and animal foods, the Authority monitors foodstuffs in the import or export process, animal food and agricultural inputs (chemical fertilizers and pesticides), as well as drinking water, canned water and treated wastewater systems used in agriculture.
For his part, Francisco Acosta Soto, Deputy Head of the EU Delegation in Tunisia, considered that ensuring food safety in Tunisia is important for the EU countries, especially as it exports important quantities of fish and grains to many European countries.
Francisco Acosta Soto pointed out the importance of monitoring the use of chemical fertilizers and their conformity with international standards in order to ensure the safety and quality of vegetables and fruits and prevent foodborne diseases.
The representative of the World Health Organization in Tunisia, Ibrahim El-Zeek, said that foodborne diseases cause huge economic losses and hinder the path of human development, pointing out that contaminated and unsafe food causes more than 200 diseases ranging from diarrhea to cancers, affecting nearly 600 million people worldwide and causing more than 400,000 deaths annually.
*. *. *

The Ministry of Health sets up joint committees for food safety, and regulatory agencies focus on prevention and control of food risks.

Non-compliance with additive use standards can lead to economic losses and health disasters, highlighting the importance of compliance with additive use standards.

Fines can be imposed for non-compliance, and regulatory agencies can close non-compliant farms to strengthen source management.

Regulatory agencies release lists of food violations for border inspection, and contaminated products can be detected through border inspections.

The use of additives in salmon farming is regulated by various agencies, and non-compliance can have severe consequences.

Title:

Content: Regulatory Compliance And Enforcement – What You Need To Know And How We Can Help

SS
Stephen Scown

Contributor

Stephen Scown
Over the past year, UK regulators have intensified inspections and prosecutions for significant legislative breaches, resulting in severe fines, reputational damage, and potential custodial sentences. This article explores non-compliance consequences and showcases successful client defense strategies.
UK Environment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Over the last 12 months there has been a noticeable increase in activity levels by the main UK regulators; conducting inspections, investigations and prosecutions where significant breaches of legislation have taken place resulting in actual harm or a risk of harm.

In this article, we look at the consequences of non-compliance and some examples of why things go wrong and explain how we have been able to help our rural clients.

What is the cost of getting it wrong?

In the event of a successful prosecution brought by the Health and Safety Executive, Environment Agency, Food Standards Agency and Local Authority Environmental Health Departments, the Courts have unlimited sentencing powers in terms of the fines that can be imposed. There are other consequences that are less straightforward to quantify in financial terms, such as reputational damage, the impact of director disqualification and having a criminal conviction.

Fines are worked out by taking account of an organisation's culpability, the level of harm caused or harm risked, and their financial status. As an example, an organisation with an annual turnover of less than £2 million whose culpability in the context of a work-related accident was found to be "high" involving a high likelihood of a significant harm, would be exposed to a potential fine of over £100,000 excluding costs. Individuals convicted of a health and safety offence can receive a custodial sentence of up to 2 years.

Similar sanctions can be, and often are, imposed for environmental offences. Recent examples include;

  • a 12 month custodial sentence and £600,000 prosecution costs order imposed on a Herefordshire farmer for undertaking non-permitted dredging and re-profiling of a 1.5km stretch of a river in a site of special scientific interest (SSSI), and
  • custodial sentences of up to 30 months handed to individuals involved in a large -scale illegal waste operation at a Staffordshire farm.

Why things have gone wrong and how we have been able to help

Health and Safety

What happened?

A member of the public claimed to have been injured after coming into contact with cows with calves at foot at the client's farm. Warning signs had been put up but these were regularly vandalised or removed.

An investigation was undertaken by HSE and an Improvement Notice was served. Acting on our advice, the Improvement Notice was appealed.

How did we help?

We successfully argued that there were no reasonably practicable alternatives to placing cows with calves in the field in question or offering other routes for rights of way users routes to follow. To minimise the risk of a future incident, the client agreed to monitor and replace warning signs more frequently and also committed to only letting cows with calves graze in the field that had established good temperaments.

We were able to persuade HSE to withdraw the Improvement Notice for technical reasons and, as a result of the prompt and effective remedial action taken by the client, also to agree not to serve a further Improvement Notice or take formal enforcement action in the form of a prosecution.

Environmental

What happened?

The following is not an uncommon story.

A farming client was approached by an individual who claimed to be the owner of a permitted waste transfer station and recycling operation nearby. The client was offered the opportunity of being provided with significant volumes of what was described as clean hardcore/construction waste to make good his farm tracks and also to receive a modest payment for each load.

No enquiries were undertaken by the client to make sure that the individual was a legitimate waste operator, there was an environmental permit in place for their site and also an exemption registered for the intended activities. The client also failed to check, or ask for documentation, to confirm the material's waste type and, importantly that it was clean and therefore free from hazardous substances.

How did we help?

Shortly afterwards, the Environment Agency became aware of what had happened and established that the imported waste was heavily contaminated with asbestos containing materials. We then became involved.

The Agency initially suspected the client of deliberately accepting contaminated hardcore in return for payment. However, through written caution representations, the background and circumstances were explained to the Agency, who quickly accepted that the client should no longer be treated as a suspect.

The client subsequently provided a witness statement to the Environment Agency for use as evidence against the prosecution brought against the illegal waste operator.

The client was fortunate as he was able to recover the costs of removing the waste to a properly permitted site as part of the victim compensation order made by the sentencing judge. We raised the making of an application for a victim compensation order with the Agency at an early stage and collated the necessary evidence required for the Agency's application to succeed.

Food Safety/Food Hygiene

What happened?

We were approached by the owner of a farm and farm shop who was being prosecuted by the Foods Standards Agency. The client was alleged to have committed multiple food safety offences associated with the sale of a dairy product.

The prosecution's case was that the client's offending was deliberate, occurred over a substantial period of time and had caused a serious health risk.

How did we help?

We went on the record for the client and, following analysis of the evidence, we challenged the basis of the Food Standards Agency's case.

As a result of undertaking focused lines of enquiry and gathering further evidence, we were able to persuade the Food Standards Agency to accept that the quality of only one small batch of the dairy product had been compromised and that the reason was due to a sudden, isolated and unknown, malfunction with the client's processing equipment.

Had the case originally advanced by the prosecution not been challenged, the sentencing guideline that would have applied (to the client) included the ability for the court to impose a custodial sentence of up to two years. Instead, a very modest fine was imposed.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More