Geoffrey Hinton is a pioneer in artificial intelligence, known for his work on neural networks and deep learning.

He is a 75-year-old British-Canadian computer scientist who developed backpropagation and created the first image-recognizing neural network.

Hinton's work led to OpenAI's GPT and ChatGPT, and he received the 2018 A.M. Turing Award for his neural network contributions.

He has warned that unregulated AI growth could lead to AI surpassing human intelligence and being used for evil purposes.

Hinton believes AI will surpass human intelligence, with development exceeding expectations.

He has warned that autonomous systems and AI could wreak havoc and spread false information.

Hinton believes AI poses a more urgent threat to humanity than climate change, yet opposes halting AI research.

Elon Musk and Steve Wozniak have expressed concerns about AI risks, with some calling for a development moratorium.

The European Union has proposed AI regulation legislation to address potential risks.

The EU's Artificial Intelligence Act regulates AI development by categorizing tools into three risk levels.

The Act aims to ensure security and innovation through stricter rules for riskier AI and transparency for lower-risk AI.

Offenders face fines of up to 40 million euros or 7% of global revenue for non-compliance.

The public should be aware that AI poses significant benefits and risks, prompting experts like Hinton to call for caution and regulation.

AI development requires a balanced approach that prioritizes innovation and risk mitigation.

Experts propose international cooperation to establish global AI regulations.

The EU's AI regulation may set global standards, potentially benefiting the US through AI system licensing.

The regulation balances innovation with citizen rights protection.

Companies warn that the regulations may hinder AI innovation in Europe.

The EU AI Act will have global consequences and apply to all companies, including those outside the EU.

Geoffrey Hinton is a pioneer in artificial intelligence, known for his work on neural networks and deep learning.

Title:

Content: • |
• Fast Quote
• |
• Member
• Product Services / Streaming
• Settings
12 / 05 / 2023
The White House ordered AI to be evaluated, and the European Union proposed legislation to regulate AI, teach AI to be human or the best solution!
• Add Favorite Column
• Collection of articles
• Fang Zhanqi
Fang Zhanze
When I was a teenager, I studied Geographic Information System, but unfortunately I didn ’ t learn anything and I graduated with luck.
After adulthood, the accidental hit into the media circle, first and then in the print, electronic, online media to roll, slightly small.
After middle age, he completed a master ’ s degree in information technology and gradually expanded his horizons. He was determined to join a start-up company and explore different fields of technology.
In recent years, he has been actively engaged in data analysis and digital strategies, and has also been involved in the development of Location Intelligence projects. Sometimes, he can also take time to teach, not only to share what he has learned with others, but also to motivate himself to keep learning for life.
Tales of Wisdom City
Generative AI is definitely the hottest topic in the technology world today. After the popularity of ChatGPT, many companies rushed to launch similar products and gradually applied them to various industries.
But more and more people are worried that when AI is fully popularized, it will aggravate the problem of fake information flow, online fraud and other problems; even Sheffield Hinton, who is known as the "godfather of AI", is worried that AI will become too smart, afraid that it will evolve into a killer robot, which may eventually lead to the death of mankind!
How big can the negative impact of AI technology be?
How do governments around the world respond to the potential threat of AI?
Neural network is the foundation technology of ChatGPT
Fifty-one years ago, Geoffrey Hinton, who had not yet been called the “godfather of AI, ” entered the University of Edinburgh in Scotland as a graduate student and began research on artificial neural networks.
The so-called “artificial neural network ” is a mathematical model that mimics the structure and function of biological neural networks, especially the brain, and is able to learn skills by analyzing data.
This is the foundational technology behind OpenAI ChatGPT and Google Bard.
After Hinton resigned from Google, he did not have to worry about the harm his words would bring to Google, so he was interviewed by different media and said his heart: "AI may lead to the death of mankind." (Photo: University of Toronto official website)
In 2012, Hinton and his students, Ilya Sutskever and Alex Krishevsky, created a neural network system that analyzes thousands of photos and learns to recognize common things like flowers, dogs, cars, etc.
Subsequently, Hinton and two students founded DNNresearch, a startup based on this research project.
In 2013, Google acquired DNNresearch for US $44 million (approximately HK $343 million), and Hinton joined Google as Vice President and Engineering Researcher, responsible for some of the research work on Google Brain.
His protégé, Suzkville, left Google to co-found OpenAI with like-minded people, and became chief scientist, leading the research team to successfully develop the GPT model and ChatGPT.
Hinton ’ s top student, Suzkville, gave up his lucrative job at Google in 2015 to co-found OpenAI with Altman and others, and led the development of GPT and DALL-E models. (Image: University of Toronto website)
I regret working my whole life because I am worried about the dangers of AI.
In 2018, Hinton, along with University of Montreal professor Yoshua Bengio and Meta chief AI scientist Yann LeCun, won the A.M. Turing Award in recognition of their great contributions to neural networks and deep learning.
As a result, the three later became known as the “godfathers of AI ” or“ godfathers of deep learning. ”
Around the same time, Google and OpenAI began to build large-scale deep learning systems based on neural networks, which became the basis for future development of Bard and ChatGPT.
From this, it seems that Sinton plays an important role in creating the current glory of generative AI.
However, in the current era of AI, Sinton suddenly left Google in April 2023, shocking the entire AI industry.
Hinton explained that he left Google to talk freely about the potential risks of AI without harming Google.
Speaking about 50 years of research into neural networks, he said, “I ’ m very sorry about my life ’ s work. ”
The Internet will be filled with more and more fake AI-generated text, photos, and even videos, but the average person will not be able to tell the truth, Hinton said.
Moreover, sooner or later, AI technology will completely disrupt the job market, causing more and more jobs to disappear.
What is even more worrying is that at present, users can not only instruct ChatGPT to generate code, but also ask the AI to execute the code; in this way, the AI killer robots that often appear in science fiction movies will one day become a reality.
Is it not impossible for AI to destroy humanity?
Of course, this pessimistic future scenario is only a hypothetical one, but Hinton stressed that what could lead to it is already happening: a global race for AI technology has begun between Microsoft and Google, and even between China and the United States.
Most people think that the future of AI dominating everything is still far away, but he believes that AI may not take 30 to 50 years to control humans, and even find a way to kill humans, which may eventually lead to human extinction.
In the 1980s, Hinton was a professor of computer science at Carnegie Mellon University in the United States, but because he was not satisfied that the university's AI research was sponsored by the United States Department of Defense, he decided to leave the United States to teach at the University of Toronto's School of Computer Science.
He pointed out that without some kind of global regulatory agreement or regulatory mechanism, the AI arms race will intensify.
For this reason, Hinton believes that the threat posed by AI to humans may be more urgent than climate change, because the solution to climate change is obvious, as long as carbon emissions are reduced or carbon neutrality is achieved, but the current AI crisis does not know how to start. Although AI may pose an existential threat to humans, he does not agree to suspend AI research, because it can never erase the benefits and application value of AI.
Hinton believes it would be better to step up regulation of AI and make everyone aware of its potential harms.
OpenAI co-founder and CEO Sam Altman also acknowledged that ChatGPT has developed some reasoning capabilities that they can ’ t explain, and that it ’ s not entirely impossible for AI to destroy humans.
However, he said that he has installed a kill switch for ChatGPT, and if the development of ChatGPT exceeds human expectations, he will immediately press the switch to stop working.
OpenAI CEO Altman, known as the “father of ChatGPT, ” recently said he was“ a little scared ” about the potential of his children, and even admitted that there is a real possibility that AI will destroy humanity. (Image: Wikipedia)
Altman admits that ChatGPT ’ s influence in elections and the spread of disinformation is a concern, so the 2024 U.S. presidential election will be a focus for OpenAI.
(Image source: Pexels Gallery website)
The Curtain of Ignorance Makes AI Right Values
However, before we press the switch, we can try to instill the right values in AI, such as helping those most in need, not destroying humans. Google ’ s DeepMind paper published in April 2023 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggests that AI can be taught from the perspective of political philosopher John Rawls.
Rawls has proposed a concept called “The Veil of Ignorance ”, which aims to achieve the most equitable distribution of benefits when group decisions are made.
According to his book, The Debate, if a group of people stand behind a curtain, all of them will instantly lose their memory, become ignorant, and forget their identity and status in the real world.
The political philosopher Ross assumes that people are behind the “curtain of ignorance ” (left) and have no idea of their skills, identities, and status.
In this scenario, people tend to choose the most equitable distribution of rights for all. (Image: Wikipedia)
At this time, these people are asked to vote for a working principle for the society.
Because they do not know where they are in this society, they cannot make decisions in an egoistic way, and they can only judge according to the principle of fairness to all people.
The situation is like, at the birthday party, you are responsible for cutting the cake, because you do not know which piece you will get, so you will try to cut each piece to the same size.
Under the curtain of ignorance, fairness and justice that has nothing to do with personal interests will emerge.
For this reason, DeepMind believes that applying the “curtain of ignorance ” to AI training may help promote fairness in the process of“ aligning ” AI with human values.
By “alignment ”, it means aligning AI ’ s wishes with those of humanity.
If AI shares fair values with humans, AI will not have the intention to destroy humanity.
White House convenes tech giants to discuss AI threats
However, even if AI does not intend to destroy humans, it may still have many negative effects on human society.
The Center for Artificial Intelligence and Digital Policy (CAIDP), a U.S. technology ethics organization, has complained to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that OpenAI ’ s latest large language model, GPT-4, is biased and deceptive and poses a risk to privacy and public safety.
The CAIDP lists potential threats that may arise from GPT-4, including: helping hackers churn out malicious code to exacerbate cyberattacks; and biased AI training data that may reinforce social stereotypes and make people of all races and genders vulnerable to unfair treatment. The FTC is investigating OpenAI, said FTC Chairman Lina Khan. "They cannot be separated from existing legislation and the Federal Trade Commission will actively enforce them," he said.
In an effort to make GPT-4 more secure, OpenAI hired 50 experts and academics to test GPT-4 against lies, language manipulation, and dangerous scientific common sense.
The OpenAI headquarters is pictured here. (Image: Wikipedia)
In early May 2023, the White House invited Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, OpenAI founder Altman, and artificial intelligence startup Anthropic founder Dario Amodei to attend a conference to discuss the impact of AI on society.
Government officials at the meeting included Vice President Kamala Harris, Biden Chief of Staff Jeff Zients, National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, National Economic Council Chairman Lael Brainard, and Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo.
U.S. President Joe Biden also attended the meeting.
EU to pass world ’ s first AI regulatory law
Generative AI, while helping to improve lives, can also pose security, privacy and fraud issues, says Ms Ho.
She noted that AI companies have an ethical and legal responsibility to ensure the safety of their AI products, while at the same time working with governments to protect civil rights and privacy.
She stressed that the White House will work to advance potential new legislation and support new legislation to mitigate the potential harms of AI technology.
In contrast, Europe has taken a step ahead in AI legislation.
On 11 May 2023, the European Parliament ’ s Committee on Civil Liberties and Consumer Protection overwhelmingly approved a position paper calling for restrictions on the use of AI in Europe, a crucial first step towards the adoption of the world ’ s first AI regulation bill.
The draft bill will be submitted to the full European Parliament for a vote in June of the same year, after which representatives of the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission will work out the final terms of the bill in tripartite talks.
The European Parliament has adopted a position paper that strengthens restrictions on biometrics, facial recognition, and the use of AI by police in routine duties.
The parliament believes the move could lead to the world ’ s first AI regulation bill. (Image: Wikipedia)
On the other hand, the White House announced that Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, NVIDIA, Stability AI, Anthropic, and Hugging Face have all committed to participating in DEF CON 31, a computer security conference to be held in August 2023, so that their AI models will be tested and evaluated by hackers and AI experts.
Experts will try to identify errors, failures, and vulnerabilities in AI tools so that AI companies can solve existing problems in their models early on.
However, these AI companies simply agree to a one-time test, rather than a commitment to a continuous evaluation when launching or improving their products, and may therefore not be sufficient to meet the regulatory requirements.
Despite this, DEF CON 31 is still seen as the first step for an AI model to be publicly evaluated.
We hope that after each important first step in legislative regulation and public evaluation, we can put generative AI trains on the right track, so that everyone can safely benefit from technological innovation.
DEF CON is one of the largest computer security conferences in the world. In addition to cybersecurity experts and hackers, participants included staff from the FBI, the Department of Defense, and the Postal Inspection Service.
The conference covered areas such as software security, computer architecture, hardware modifications, and other vulnerable areas of information. (Image: DEF CON official website)
The content of the signed and / or unsigned articles published by Economic Times is the author's personal opinion and does not represent the position of Economic Times, and the role of Economic Times is to provide a free speech platform.
etnet won the HKEX Awards 2022 “Best Performing Securities Data Provider ” and“ Best Performing Derivative Data Provider ” ► Learn More
I want to respond
You may be interested
Enlarge display
I know. I know.
Featured Articles
• Life
• DIVA
• Healthy and good life

Title:

Content: Geoffrey Hinton, the godfather of AI, said after leaving Google that artificial intelligence is becoming smarter than humans.
2023 / 5 / 3 16: 46: 16 Source: IT House Author: Yuanyang Editor: Yuanyang
IT home May 3 news, one of the pioneers in the field of artificial intelligence, known as the "godfather of AI" Geoffrey Hinton (Geoffrey Hinton) recently announced that he has left the Google company he worked for ten years, because he is increasingly worried about the development of artificial intelligence technology.
In an interview with CNN's Jake Tapper today, he said that he believes artificial intelligence is becoming smarter than humans, and he wants to "blow the whistle" to remind people that they should seriously consider how to prevent artificial intelligence from controlling humans.
I'm just a scientist who suddenly realizes that these things are becoming smarter than we are, "Hinton said." I want to 'blow the whistle' in a way that says we should seriously worry about how to stop these things from taking control of us. "
Hinton was a pioneer in neural network technology, and his research laid the foundation for the artificial intelligence systems used in many products today.
IT House previously reported that he first revealed his departure in an interview with The New York Times on Monday and expressed his concerns about the potential harms of AI technology.
He said he was concerned that AI would lead to mass unemployment and create a world where many people “can ’ t know what ’ s real. ”
He also noted that the pace of advances in AI technology has far exceeded his and others ’ expectations.
If it becomes much smarter than us, it ’ s going to be very good at manipulating because it ’ s learned from us, and there are very few examples of a smarter thing being controlled by a dumber thing, ” Hinton told Tapper on Tuesday.
It will figure out ways to manipulate people into doing what it wants.
Hinton isn ’ t the only tech leader to express concerns about AI, and in March, a group of community members published a letter calling on AI labs to suspend training for at least six months on the most powerful AI systems, citing “profound risks to society and humanity. ”
Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, one of those who signed the letter, reiterated concerns about artificial intelligence spreading false information on “CNN Morning ” on Tuesday.“ Deception will become easier for those who want to cheat you. ” Wozniak told CNN, “We ’ re not making any changes in that — we ’ re just assuming that our existing laws will fix the problem. ” Wozniak also said there may be a need for“ some type ” of regulation.
Hinton said he did not sign the petition. “I don ’ t think we can stop this progress, ” he said.“ I didn ’ t sign the petition saying we should stop studying artificial intelligence, because if the Americans stop doing research, the Chinese won ’ t. ” But he admitted that he didn ’ t have a clear solution, “I don ’ t know if we can solve this problem. ”
I believe we should try to think about ways to solve the problem.
I don't have a solution at the moment. '
Related articles
Key word: artificial intelligence
Soft media 's website: IT home hot products - Value shopping guide, coupons most buy - rebate coupons iPhone home Win7 home Win10 home Win11 home
Soft media software: Cube cloud calendar cool point desktop Win7 optimization master Win10 optimization master soft media mobile APP application

Title:

Content: Geoffrey Hinton: GPT-4 is 100 times more knowledgeable than any human
Author: MIAO Yongqi
Published: Updated:
Computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton, known as the "godfather of artificial intelligence", announced Monday that he has resigned from Google. He has devoted his life to developing artificial intelligence systems, saying he "regrets his life's work" and is wary of the potential dangers of AI development.
In another recent interview, Hinton further talked about why he is afraid of AI development.
Hinton, 75, left Google a few days after the news broke in an interview with MIT Technology Review senior editor Will Douglas Heaven.
Hinton points out that the new generation of AI language models, especially the GPT-4, which came out in March, made him realize that these machines were moving in a direction that was much smarter than he thought, and he was afraid of these developments.
He is best known for a technique he proposed in the 1980s (with two colleagues) called backpropagation.
In short, the algorithms that allow machines to learn support almost all of today ’ s artificial neural networks, from computer vision systems to large language models.
It wasn ’ t until the 2010s that Hinton and his two recent graduates developed a “neural network ” that demonstrated its power, stronger than any computer ’ s ability to identify objects in images, and trained it to predict the next letter of a sentence, a precursor to today ’ s large-scale language patterns.
One of the students was Ilya Sutskever, the founder of OpenAI, who led the development of ChatGPT.
“We first thought it might be great. ”“ But it ’ s going to take a long time to realize that it needs to be done on a large scale to get good results. ”
In the 1980s, the discussion of “neural networks ” was considered a joke.
But Hinton doesn ’ t think so, and is working on this, software that mimics the abstract human brain and uses code as a connection between neurons. For 40 years, Hinton has viewed artificial neural networks as a clumsy attempt to mimic biological neural networks.
Now he thinks things have changed: he thinks there are better results when trying to mimic the behavior of the biological brain.
“It ’ s scary when you see it with your own eyes, ” he said.“ It ’ s a sudden change. ”
So why did ChatGPT surprise Hinton, too? He explained that the human brain has about 100 trillion connections, and “large language models have up to 500 billion, up to a trillion. ”
However, the knowledge of GPT-4 is a hundred times greater than that of any human.
So maybe it actually has a better learning algorithm than we do. "
He also pointed out that apart from the ability to learn, the ability to communicate is another kind of point.
“If you or I learn a new thing and want to teach it to another person, we can ’ t just send them a copy. ”
But artificial neural networks can do it.
It ’ s like there are 10,000 people here, and when one person learns a new thing, the other 9,999 people all learn it at the same time.
Hinton now believes that there are two types of intelligence: animal brains and artificial neural networks.
“It ’ s a completely different kind of intelligence.
“A new, better intelligence. ” Hinton believes that whether superintelligence is good or bad depends largely on whether you ’ re an optimist or a pessimist, and he says,“ mildly depressed, ” “that ’ s why I ’ m afraid. ”
“Whether these things are going to be smarter than us, I suddenly changed my mind. ”
I think they are very close to us now and they will be much smarter than us in the future, ” he said.
“How do we survive? ” he is particularly worried that people will use the tools he has developed to change the trajectory of human life, including elections and wars.
He said that he hopes to continue talking about AI security after leaving office and spend more time on “more philosophical work ”.“ As long as I ’ m still employed at Google, I can ’ t say what I want to say, ” he said. “I have a lot of good things to say about Google, and it would be more convincing if I wasn ’ t at Google. ”
Who is the godfather of AI computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton?
Hinton pioneered the basic technology of AI systems and became interested in artificial neural networks when he was a graduate student at the University of Edinburgh in 1972. In 2018, he and two experts in the field of deep learning were awarded the Turing Award, known as the “Nobel Prize in Computing ”.
What are the main concerns of “AI Godfather ” Geoffrey Hinton about the development of artificial intelligence?
He believes that the most direct impact is to promote the dissemination of false information and the loss of employment opportunities, and also worries about the use of this tool for evil, such as influencing elections and using it in war.

Title:

Content: The ‘Godfather of AI’ warns about potential dangers of the technology as he quits Google

British-Canadian computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton admits he has fears for the future of AI

In a Frankenstein-esque tale of maker and master, Geoffrey Hinton, 75, dubbed ‘the godfather of AI’, has left Google with a parting warning over the dangers of artificial intelligence.

In 2012, the British-Canadian computer scientist invented technology with two students at University of Toronto that would become the intellectual foundation for AI systems. Google purchased the rights to this neural network tech to the tune of $44 million, which also propelled Dr Hinton to receive the Turing Award in 2018, considered the Nobel Prize of computing.

Read More
The ultimate part-AI girl? One Tatler correspondent entrusts ChatGPT with her next assignment

ChatGPT’s the new It Girl in Town and now she’s got all the gossip, writes Dora Davies-Evitt in the April issue

Yet now, Dr Hinton has packed in the day job at Google to join a chorus of anxious experts demanding a rollback of AI research until more robust safety measures are designed and deployed. Dr Hinton told the BBC: ‘Right now, they’re not more intelligent than us, as far as I can tell. But I think they soon may be.’

While many look upon AI as a natural technological development akin to the internet that could lead to exciting breakthroughs for humanity, there are growing fears that AI is a Pandora’s box. Reflecting on the effects of his work, Dr Hinton said: ‘I console myself with the normal excuse: If I hadn’t done it, somebody would have,’ as he admitted, ‘it is hard to see how you can prevent the bad actors from using it for bad things.’

Read More
Cyber Society: Meet the NFT duo dominating the metaverse

Old Etonian digital artists Dominic Smith and Joe Carnell have caught the attention of Brooklyn Beckham, Steve Aoki and Jaden Smith

The scientist went on to warn that AI could be taught to ‘create sub-goals like “I need to get more power”’, and be harnessed by nefarious actors to wreak havoc. With innovation driven forward by the unstoppable competition between behemoths like Google and Microsoft, Dr Hinton warned innovation will only increase exponentially in the coming years.

There are those who are trying to apply the brakes to this runaway train. In March, an open letter was signed by over 1,000 tech leaders and researchers, including Elon Musk and fellow Turing Award winner Yoshu Bengio, calling for a six-month moratorium on AI development. A few days later, 19 leaders of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence released their own letter on the risks of AI. The signatures included that of Eric Horvitz, chief scientific officer at Microsoft.

The main outcry over AI lies in its ability to create and disseminate false news and images, which the public may find increasingly hard to identify. AI also poses a threat to academia and careers (see: Tatler’s foray into the world of ChatGPT). Dr Hinton believes that AI will fundamentally disrupt the workplace and take over the ‘drudge work’.

Read More
Lady Meta: my stratospheric rise through the metaverse

The Crypto Fashion Week debutante on becoming VR’s favourite It Girl

However Google’s chief scientist, Jeff Dean, offered words of comfort, adding: 'We remain committed to a responsible approach to AI. We’re continually learning to understand emerging risks while also innovating boldly.’

Title:

Content: AI Godfather Hinton: Artificial intelligence threatens humanity more urgently than climate change
Central News Agency
Geoffrey Hinton, a pioneer in artificial intelligence (AI), said in an interview with Reuters today that the threat posed by AI to humans may be “more urgent ” than climate change.
This is an advertisement, please continue reading.
Hinton, 75, who is regarded as one of the “godfathers ” of artificial intelligence, recently announced his departure from Alphabet, a 10-year tech company, because he wanted to make the risks of artificial intelligence public without involving employers.
Hinton ’ s research has been recognized as an important contribution to the development of contemporary AI systems. In 1986, he co-authored the influential paper Learning Representations by Back-propagating Errors, which set a milestone in the development of neural networks supporting AI technology. In 2018, he received the Turing Award for his research breakthroughs. And...
Hinton is one of a growing number of technology leaders who are concerned that machine intelligence will surpass humans and ultimately control the planet, and are openly raising concerns about the potential threat posed by AI.
“I ’ m not trying to downplay the importance of climate change, nor am I saying we shouldn ’ t worry about climate change, which is also a big risk, ” Hinton said.
But I think (artificial intelligence) may be more urgent in the end. "
“When it comes to climate change, making recommendations is simple: just stop carbon emissions.
If you do that, things will get better.
And when it comes to (artificial intelligence), there ’ s nothing we can do about it. ”
OpenAI, a U.S. artificial intelligence research lab sponsored by technology company Microsoft, launched ChatGPT, a chatbot that took the first shot at the AI race last November and quickly became the fastest-growing app in history, with 100 million monthly active users in just two months.
In April, thousands of people signed an open letter calling on all AI labs to suspend development of systems more powerful than OpenAI ’ s recently launched GPT-4 for at least six months, including social media CEO Elon Musk, AI pioneers Yoshua Bengio and Stuart Russell.
Hinton shares the concerns of the co-authors, who fear AI could pose an existential threat to humanity, but he disagrees with the suspension of research.
He said, “It ’ s not practical.
I agree that this is an existential risk, and it ’ s close, and it ’ s time to put a lot of effort into understanding what we can do. ”
Following the publication of the joint letter, the 12 members of the European Parliament called on leaders such as U.S. President Joe Biden and European Union Executive Committee Chairman Ursula von der Leyen to convene a summit to discuss how to control the development of advanced artificial intelligence systems such as ChatGPT, which are developing faster than expected.
“Technology leaders know best about [artificial intelligence], and politics must be involved, ” says Hinton.
This matter concerns all of us, so we must all think carefully. ”
This is an advertisement, please continue reading.

Title:

Content: Wednesday, December 13, 2023
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

John Riopelle — obituary

Riopelle, John William It is with great sadness...

A.I. doesn’t bleed

by John Clinton, Ramsay New knowledge merges with...

Breakfast at the Legion, December 16

At the Almonte Legion Sat. December 16 Eggs to...
Science & NatureA.I. doesn't bleed

A.I. doesn’t bleed

by John Clinton, Ramsay

New knowledge merges with old; what you know shapes what you learn. Artificial neural networks have been studied and computer algorithms have been generated to understand how artificial, computer-generated, neurons, would store a concept, and how it would revise that concept if it was flawed.

Geoffrey Hinton, a computer scientist often called ‘the godfather of AI,’ is a leading figure in neural networks; studies inspired by the way neurons are connected in the human brain. A New Yorker magazine piece describes his collaborative work in the 1960s and 1970s developing neural nets that couldn’t do anything better than a child. The technology suddenly improved about a decade ago with the large increase in processing speed and Internet data availability.

According to Google Scholar, Hinton is the second most cited researcher among psychologists and the most cited among computer and cognitive scientists.

Hinton has been worried about the potential of AI to do harm and he often talks about the existential threat that AI might pose to the human species. He has used OpenAI’s ChatGPT and this has made him uneasy. He wrote “Fox News is an oxymoron” asking ChatGPT to explain the joke. (Initial reading of this caused me to ponder – a moron full of oxygen??) The first reply told him that this implied Fox News was fake news. When he called attention to the space between oxy and moron, it explained that Fox News was addictive, like the drug OxyContin. To him, this level of understanding represents a new era in AI.

In nature, wildlife learns how to be intelligent without access to concepts expressed in words. They learn to be smart (survive) through experience. Learning, not knowledge, is the engine of intelligence. There is no use trying to explain complicated ideas that you do not understand. First, you must understand how something works. Otherwise, you just produce nonsense.

Because neural networks are so strange, no one can predict how useful – or dangerous – AI will become. OpenAI’s GPT models involve billions of artificial neurons (data) which are profoundly different than biological brains. They are not alive. Our intuitions tell us that nothing resident in a browser tab could really be thinking in the way we do.

Because a human brain can run on oatmeal, the world can support billions of brains, all different. Each brain can learn continuously, rather than being trained once, then pushed out into the world (ship it!).

If the brain dies, the knowledge dies. If a computer dies, load up another computer. Ten thousand neural nets can learn ten thousand different things at the same time and share what they have learned. This immortality (knowledge perpetuity) and replicability suggest we should be concerned about digital intelligence taking over from biological intelligence.

Current AI technology is talkative and intellectual. The problems of physical intuition will be the challenge of the next decade says Yann LeCun, a French computer scientist. A teenager can learn to drive a car in twenty hours of practice with little supervision. AI systems don’t come close to doing this – except self-driving cars – and they are over-engineered, requiring the mapping of whole cities, hundreds of engineers, and hundreds of thousands of hours of training.

And then there is the problem of what some researchers call AI ‘hallucination’, which Hinton names ‘confabulation.’ AI systems confabulate by making up plausible answers to questions that stump them. In the human mind, there is no boundary between just making it up and telling the truth. Telling the truth is just making it up correctly. ChatGPT’s ability to make things up is a flaw, but also a sign of its humanlike intelligence.

When Hinton began his research, no one thought the technology would succeed. When it started to succeed, no one thought it would succeed so quickly. He expects AI will contribute to many fields, but he fears what will happen when powerful people abuse it. Think autonomous weapons. Hinton warns that even benign autonomous systems could wreak havoc. Yann LeCun has said there is an idea that if a system is intelligent it is going to want to dominate. But the desire to dominate has nothing to do with intelligence – it has to do with testosterone.

Recently, Hinton did not sign a popular petition that called for at least a six-month pause in AI research.

“China is not going to stop development for six months.”

“So what should we do?”

“I don’t know. If this were like climate change where we either must stop burning carbon or find a way to remove carbon from the atmosphere, we know what the solution looks like. Here, with AI, it’s not like that.”

Think of the AI story in which our intuitions about the specialness of the human mind are being dislodged by thinking machines, or, having stolen fire, we risk being burned.

Are we fooling ourselves, being taken in by our own machines and the companies that hope to profit from them? By seeking to re-create the knowledge systems in our heads, have we seized the forbidden apple? Have we risked exile from our charmed world? But who would choose not to know how knowing works?

Related

FOLLOW US

Latest

From the Archives

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

He is a 75-year-old British-Canadian computer scientist who developed backpropagation and created the first image-recognizing neural network.

Which 1986 paper by Hinton became foundational for modern neural networks?

Which 1986 paper by Hinton became foundational for modern neural networks?

Hinton's work led to OpenAI's GPT and ChatGPT, and he received the 2018 A.M. Turing Award for his neural network contributions.

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

Which prestigious award did Hinton receive in 2018 for his work on neural networks?

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

Which prestigious award did Hinton receive in 2018 for his work on neural networks?

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

Which prestigious award did Hinton receive in 2018 for his work on neural networks?

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

Which prestigious award did Hinton receive in 2018 for his work on neural networks?

He has warned that unregulated AI growth could lead to AI surpassing human intelligence and being used for evil purposes.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Becomes uncontrollable
Poses ethical risks

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Becomes uncontrollable
Poses ethical risks

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Becomes uncontrollable
Poses ethical risks

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Becomes uncontrollable
Poses ethical risks

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Becomes uncontrollable
Poses ethical risks

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

Hinton believes AI will surpass human intelligence, with development exceeding expectations.

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

He has warned that autonomous systems and AI could wreak havoc and spread false information.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Becomes uncontrollable
Poses ethical risks

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Becomes uncontrollable
Poses ethical risks

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

Hinton believes AI poses a more urgent threat to humanity than climate change, yet opposes halting AI research.

Elon Musk and Steve Wozniak have expressed concerns about AI risks, with some calling for a development moratorium.

Title:

Content: My channel
* Drag categories can be customized sorting
Recover Default OK
Setup
Alert
The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on five Supreme Court ethics concerns.
New York City Council Protests to Abolish 24-hour Work
The godfather of AI leaves Google worried that artificial intelligence will fall into the wrong hands
The US media reported today that Hinton, known as the “godfather of AI ”, resigned his job at Google and openly talked about the risks of AI, worried that AI would fall into the wrong hands.
He says it ’ s hard to see how to prevent bad people from using it to do bad things.
Geoffrey Hinton, who laid the groundwork for artificial intelligence (AI) systems, told The New York Times that advances in AI pose “great risks to society and humanity. ”
In a report published today in The New York Times, Hinton was quoted as saying, “Look at how it looked five years ago and now, the difference and growth, it ’ s really scary. ”
Hinton pointed out that competition among tech giants is driving these companies to release new AI technologies at a dangerous rate, which will endanger people ’ s jobs and spread misinformation.
"It's hard to see how you can prevent bad people from using AI to do bad things," he told the New York Times.
OpenAI, the startup behind Google and now the most powerful AI chatbot, ChatGPT, began developing systems with more data than ever before in 2022.
Hinton told the New York Times that he believes these systems are surpassing human intelligence in some ways because of the sheer volume of data they analyze.
"Perhaps these systems are already more powerful than the human brain," he said.
While AI has been used to support human needs for work, the rapid development of chatbots like ChatGPT could leave human jobs in jeopardy.
He told the New York Times that AI was “taking on a chore, ” but that“ it ’ s probably going to do more than that. ”
Hinton also warned that AI could spread the wrong message, telling the New York Times that the average person would “never know what ’ s true again. ”
According to the New York Times, Hinton submitted his resignation to Google last month.
Google ’ s head of AI, Jeff Dean, expressed his gratitude to Hinton in a statement to the US media.
“As one of the first companies to publish AI principles, we remain committed to taking a responsible approach to AI, ” the statement added.
“While we innovate boldly, we are constantly discovering new risks. ”
Tech billionaire Elon Musk and many experts have called for a pause in the development of AI systems to allow time to ensure the technology is safe.
After the introduction of GPT-4, which is more powerful than the AI used by ChatGPT, Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak signed an open letter.
Hinton, who was not involved in the petition, told the New York Times that scientists should not “further scale research and development ” until they understood if they could control AI.
The New York Times Google
The last one.
The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on five Supreme Court ethics concerns.
The next one.
Equal request?
US asks Chinese airlines not to fly over Russian airspace
Extended reading
Super-popular
More >

The European Union has proposed AI regulation legislation to address potential risks.

The EU's Artificial Intelligence Act regulates AI development by categorizing tools into three risk levels.

Title:

Content: Add Favorite Column Favorite Articles
2023-06-23
The world 's first AI law is out! The European Parliament passed the artificial intelligence bill, why Google and OpenAI shout hard to bear?
Technology is always moving faster than legislation!
Generative AI is now blossoming around the world, but there are still no specific regulations. With the draft AI Act just passed by the European Parliament, this “unworkable ” situation will be rewritten – in the future, AI will be regulated to varying degrees by risk level.
However, Google is worried that the new law may endanger the company's business secrets. Open AI CEO Altman once said that the new regulation is overregulated and may withdraw from the European market!
How much impact will this bill have on the AI industry?
AI is divided into 3 risk levels for monitoring
In order to prevent the development of AI from getting out of control, the European Parliament adopted the draft Artificial Intelligence Law by a large majority on June 14, 2023.
In fact, as early as 2021, the European Union has started the legislative process on AI regulation, but at the end of 2022, the generative AI led by ChatGPT suddenly became popular, so lawmakers adjusted the draft for this new AI tool.
According to the revised draft, AI tools will be divided into three risk levels according to their technical characteristics, and there will be corresponding regulatory guidelines for different levels.
On June 14, 2023, the European Parliament passed the draft Artificial Intelligence Act by a vote of 499 to 28. (Image: Twitter @ IoanDragosT)
Unacceptable risk: Facial recognition and biometric surveillance systems operating in public places; social rating systems that classify people by race, behavior, social status, or economic ability; predictive police systems that attempt to predict future illegal activity by analyzing previous criminal behavior are classified as “unacceptable risk ” and are completely prohibited.
High risk: Using AI to score credit to determine whether an applicant can get a loan; using AI to screen resumes to determine whether a candidate can get an interview … etc., AI systems that may determine the livelihood of the public are rated as “high risk ”.
In addition, the AI algorithms of large social media platforms, which are responsible for recommending to users what content to watch, are also classified as “high risk ” and must comply with certain legal requirements because they may be used to influence public opinion and election results.
Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT are not classified as “high risk ” under the AI Act, but the source of training data for AI models is strictly required to be fully disclosed.
(Image source: Freepik Gallery)
Low risk: Video games developed using AI and AI-powered spam filters are classified as “low risk ” and are largely unrestricted.
According to the AI Act, both AI-enabled video games and AI-developed video games are classified as “low risk ”. (Credit: Freepik Gallery)
AI model training data source must be fully disclosed
Dragos Tudorache, a member of the European Parliament from Romania and co-author of the AI Act, said that this is the first formal legislation on artificial intelligence in the world, and represents the EU can lead AI in the direction of “people-oriented ”, trustworthy and safe.
“This new EU regulation will set the tone for global AI development and governance, ” stressed European Parliament Member from Romania, co-author of the AI Act. (Image: Twitter @ IoanDragosT)
The bill does not regard generative AI tools such as ChatGPT as “high risk ”, but adds guardrails and transparency requirements to the large language models behind them, including: AI developers must take safeguards to prevent AI from generating illegal content; developers must mark AI-generated content to prevent AI from being abused to spread false information; and developers must disclose data sources used to train language models. Copyrighted data for training; when a content creator ’ s work is used by AI as material to generate content, developers must offer a profit-sharing scheme to the copyright holder.
Once fully passed by the European Union, the AI Act will become the world ’ s first comprehensive AI regulation, and in future, offenders can be fined up to 40 million euros (about HK $344 million), or 7% of the company ’ s global annual revenue, whichever is higher.
Publication and press support for legislation to protect copyright
The European Union ’ s two-year AI bill passed in stages, and it certainly received a lot of applause.
The proposed regulation of generative AI is widely supported by publishers, news media, and content creators.
Under the AI Act, content creators can know if their blog posts, paintings, videos, or songs have been used to train AI models, and they can then decide whether to allow their work to be copied and used by AI, and seek compensation accordingly.
At the same time, there is no shortage of people in the tech and academic circles supporting the bill, because they believe that the current AI military competition is too fierce, and if it does not start with the most fundamental research and development process, restrictions and regulations will become unmanageable. Under the circumstances, allowing AI companies to continue to operate is certainly a worse thing for society.
However, the AI industry believes that regulation should target specific AI applications and not impose restrictions on AI development as a whole, as this will only stifle innovation in the AI industry.
Boniface de Champris, European policy manager at the Computer and Communications Industry Association, said that the EU bill should not only clearly define “risk ”, but also provide AI developers with enough flexibility so that all Europeans have access to useful AI tools.
AI Act is too vague or stifling technological innovation
Peter Schwartz, senior vice president of strategic planning at Salesforce, criticized the EU for not considering the reality when drafting the AI Act, and pointed out that European companies are slower to develop in the AI field.
He believes that the AI Act is too broad, and it is likely that some US companies will rethink their engagement in the European market.
Google also criticized the EU AI bill, emphasizing that the resources used to train AI models are commercial secrets, and the AI Act forced developers to disclose relevant information, which may allow companies to leak trade secrets or create security vulnerabilities for the system, which can be exploited by competitors or criminals.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has repeatedly called for AI regulation, and in recent months has traveled across Europe, Asia, South America and Africa to meet with lawmakers, including European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, to discuss how AI should be regulated.
Still, he hopes that regulatory legislation will not discourage AI developers from innovating.
OpenAI CEO Altman (left) visited around 100 policymakers in the Americas, Europe, Asia, and Africa in recent months, including European Commission President Von der Leyen (right), to discuss how AI regulation can be implemented without hindering technological innovation.
(Photo credit: Twitter @ vonderleyen)
On May 24, 2023, Altman said that the draft AI Act overregulates the AI industry and threatens to withdraw from the European market if OpenAI is found to be unable to comply with the new EU legislation.
His threats to leave Europe have drawn criticism from Thierry Breton, the EU ’ s internal markets executive, and several European lawmakers.
On May 26, Altman said, “We are happy to continue to operate here, and of course there are no plans to leave. ”
AI biometrics cause discrimination and privacy violations
Although some AI companies believe that the AI Act is too strong to regulate, some security experts pointed out that the scope of the law is not comprehensive enough – it lacks control of AI computing power.
Whenever a new generation of large-scale language models is released, the computing power of AI systems will increase exponentially compared to the previous generation, and the accompanying security risks may increase exponentially. Andrea Miotti, chief strategy and governance officer of Conjecture, an AI information security startup, said that the greater the computing power used to train AI models, the more powerful AI will be, and the potential risks will be greater. And...
In addition, the AI Act itself contains a more controversial provision – banning the use of biometric systems.
According to a report published by the BBC and Amnesty International, AI companies with facial and biometric technology can collect and analyze people ’ s appearance information on a large scale through social media or television images, posing a significant threat to personal privacy.
For the regulation of AI biometric technology, the European Parliament and the European Commission have not yet reached a consensus, which will become a major obstacle to the full adoption of the AI Act bill.
(Image source: Freepik Gallery)
Face recognition technology has been able to identify people according to their appearance. If it is widely introduced to law enforcement agencies, the proportion of black and brown people being intercepted and searched is likely to increase significantly.
Amnesty International has found that facial recognition cameras made by Dutch technology company TKH Security have been used by Israel to aid in the implementation of apartheid policies against Palestinians.
EU sets AI regulatory standard as a global model
The European Parliament voted to completely ban AI biometrics, but the European Commission wants to allow governments to use biometrics when searching for missing children or hunting terrorists.
In fact, the EU AI Act requires a three-way vote by the European Parliament, the European Commission, and the European Council to enter into force.
Even if the bill has been passed by the European Parliament, it will still need to be negotiated with the European Commission and the European Council.
EU officials have said they will start negotiations as soon as possible, hoping to reach an agreement by the end of 2023 so that the law can enter into force before the 2024 EU elections.
However, because the European Parliament and the European Commission have different views on the regulation of the application of biometrics, and the European Council is composed of representatives of the 27 member states of the European Union, it is difficult to say how long it will actually take to lobby and negotiate one by one.
If the final version of the AI Act can be passed by the three parties by the end of 2023, there will be a two-year grace period for adaptation, and it is expected that it will not fully enter into force until after 2025. Although the AI Act covers only EU member states, its regulations on AI regulation can serve as a reference for other countries and are expected to affect the development of global AI policy. Penetrates to all consumer products.
As a result, this world-leading AI regulatory law will have a far-reaching impact on the future development of AI.
The AI Act needs to be passed by the European Parliament, the European Council and the European Commission before it can enter into force.
Even though the bill has now been passed by the European Parliament, it is still subject to change in the future.
(Image credit: Twitter @ IoanDragosT)
Extended reading:
The development of AI is too fast to cause panic! The European Union and Canada are the first to legislate globally! OpenAI proposes to set up a special regulatory body in Washington
The White House ordered AI to be evaluated, and the European Union proposed legislation to regulate AI, teach AI to be human or the best solution!
The content of the signed and / or unsigned articles published by Economic Times is the author's personal opinion and does not represent the position of Economic Times, and the role of Economic Times is to provide a free speech platform.
Click here to learn more about the update, enter the game, and fill in the questionnaire to win the prize!
► Get to know and join now
More Smart City Story Articles
You may be interested
# Smart Living # Technology # Legislation # Generative AI # Regulation # Regulation # European Parliament # Artificial Intelligence Law # AI Act # Google # Open A # New Regulation # Europe # Impact
Editor 's recommendation
Instant Quote
Full text search
Search
Recently searched.
Dual Currency Trading
Grand National Game
More
Share

The Act aims to ensure security and innovation through stricter rules for riskier AI and transparency for lower-risk AI.

Title:

Content: Grow with AppMaster.
Become our partner
EU moves towards new regulatory framework for AI systems
The EU Presidency and parliamentary negotiators have reached a preliminary consensus on the first framework for the regulation of AI applications in the EU.
The European Council announced in a recent press release that the initiative is committed to ensuring the security of AI applications introduced to the European market.
The proposal also wants to spur AI innovation and investment in the region, while respecting fundamental rights and EU principles.
The proposed EU regulation is strategically designed in accordance with the Artificial Intelligence Act and adopts a risk-defined approach to controlling artificial intelligence.
Under this approach, riskier AI applications will operate under stricter rules.
This does not mean that low-risk artificial intelligence will be unregulated.
Instead, it enforces “transparency obligations ” to ensure that consumers make autonomous decisions about AI-generated content.
In addition, the proposed regulations introduce a fine structure proportional to the revenue of the offending company.
However, if the calculated percentage-based penalty is exceeded, a fixed amount may replace that amount.
In addition to regulation, the new AI bill also aims to promote innovation in AI systems.
It comes with novel regulations designed to facilitate testing of these systems in real-world scenarios.
These regulations will enable AI researchers and developers to refine and optimize their solutions to better meet user needs and market dynamics.
While the agreement marks an important step, completion and implementation are still ongoing.
Officials will continue to refine the details of the regulation in the coming weeks.
The new law will not be actively enforced until 2025 at the earliest.
Spain ’ s State Secretary for Digitalization and Artificial Intelligence, Camel Artigas, expressed satisfaction, calling the agreement a “historic achievement. ”
She further stated that the proposal successfully addresses global challenges in a rapidly evolving technology environment.
She paid due tribute to the initiative for maintaining a delicate balance, promoting artificial intelligence innovation in Europe, and ensuring the protection of the fundamental rights of citizens.
Platforms such as AppMaster pay close attention to the regulatory environment, continually evolve their no-code platforms to maintain compliance, and guide users to develop applications with a high degree of respect for user rights and security regulations.
These developments further demonstrate the need for instruments that are transparent, flexible and capable of putting power back into the hands of the people.
Related posts
Atlassian Integrates Artificial Intelligence into its Cloud Products to Facilitate Human-Computer Interaction
As a major move, Atlassian has rolled out artificial intelligence capabilities across the cloud to enhance the user experience.
Relevance AI ’ s revolutionary low-code platform will democratize access for AI teams
Relevance AI is an Australia-based startup committed to democratizing AI workforce development for companies of all sizes through its low-code SaaS platform.
European AI innovator Mistral AI rules out $415 million funding round
Paris-based AI startup Mistral AI has effectively closed its Series A funding round, raising $415 million.
Start for free
Are you inspired to try it yourself?
The best way to learn about the power of AppMaster is to experience it firsthand.
Free subscription, make your own app in minutes
Turn your ideas into reality

Offenders face fines of up to 40 million euros or 7% of global revenue for non-compliance.

The public should be aware that AI poses significant benefits and risks, prompting experts like Hinton to call for caution and regulation.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

AI development requires a balanced approach that prioritizes innovation and risk mitigation.

Title:

Content: AI Regulation: Senators Unveil AI Plan, Open AI CEO Wants International Agency

A growing chorus of lawmakers and technology leaders are calling for new regulations to govern the rapid rise of artificial intelligence (AI) as the transformative but largely unchecked technology permeates more aspects of daily life.

On Wednesday (May 15), a bipartisan group of senators unveiled a long-awaited plan to bolster U.S. AI efforts, calling for a significant funding boost while largely deferring on the thorny issue of regulating the rapidly advancing technology.

The legislative blueprint, laid out in a 20-page document titled “Driving U.S. Innovation in Artificial Intelligence,” urges ramping up government and private-sector AI research and development to $32 billion annually by 2026.

The plan was introduced by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and three colleagues.

National Movement for AI Regulations

U.S. politicians have been calling for more AI regulations for some time.

Sen. Mitt Romney demanded last month increased federal regulation of AI. However, such efforts are likely to encounter obstacles due to the technology’s rapid development and broad applications, making effective oversight a complex challenge, according to experts. While many acknowledged the potential risks associated with AI, they emphasized the difficulty in determining which AI systems require stringent regulation and underscore the need to strike a balance between fostering technological innovation and mitigating those risks.

AI regulation is facing headwinds at the state level. Colorado and Connecticut introduced legislation this year to become national leaders in regulating artificial intelligence, targeting companies that develop and utilize AI systems and prohibiting discrimination in critical services such as healthcare, employment and housing. However, Connecticut’s efforts collapsed after a veto threat from the Democratic Governor, citing concerns about stifling the nascent industry. At the same time, Colorado’s bill faces intense pressure from the tech lobby, arguing against a state-by-state regulatory approach, leaving lawmakers nationwide closely monitoring the outcome.

The national movement to rein in AI is part of a larger global effort. The U.S. and China are set to engage in their first high-level talks on AI, which experts believe could significantly impact the future of international commerce. The discussions aim to establish a foundation for managing AI technology and regulation, shaping policies, cooperation and safeguards against accidental mismanagement or deliberate weaponization that could devastate markets, industries and security systems.

OpenAI CEO Wants a Global AI Agency

The private sector is also pushing for change.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has expressed support for establishing an international agency to regulate artificial intelligence, citing concerns about the potential for “significant global harm” from advanced AI systems shortly.

Speaking on the “All-In” podcast on Friday (May 10), Altman emphasized the need for a balanced approach to regulation, cautioning against excessive and insufficient oversight. He believes that AI systems could soon have negative impacts that transcend national borders, necessitating an international regulatory body to ensure the safety of the most potent AI models.

“I think there will come a time in the not-so-distant future — like we’re not talking decades and decades from now — where frontier AI systems are capable of causing significant global harm,” Altman said on the podcast.

He said he believes AI systems will have a “negative impact way beyond the realm of one country” and wants to see them regulated by “an international agency looking at the most powerful systems and ensuring reasonable safety testing.”

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Experts propose international cooperation to establish global AI regulations.

Title:

Content: Expert: AI poses serious risk to global health and security China ’ s credit monitoring system oppresses people
A group of doctors and medical experts have urged the urgent need for an international treaty on AI regulation.
A group of doctors and public health experts have joined calls to suspend development of artificial intelligence until sufficient regulations are in place.
Source: SBS
Key points:
• A new study says the development of artificial intelligence could lead to the emergence of autonomous weapons capable of killing people “on an industrial scale. ”
The study ’ s authors also warn that the loss of jobs could have an impact on human health as more types of work are automated.
• The authors also warn that powerful AI-powered surveillance systems could be used to oppress people.
A group of doctors and public health experts say the development of artificial intelligence (AI) needs to be put on hold because it poses a risk to public health and safety.
According to a study published in the open journal BMJ Global Health, AI could facilitate the development of autonomous weapons capable of killing people “on an industrial scale ” without human supervision.
The study ’ s authors, David McCoy and Frederik Federspiel, say governments can also use AI to create powerful surveillance systems that can spread misinformation and social divisions, manipulate consumer choices, and even fuel government oppression.
"We do need an international treaty and a global regulatory approach," McCoy, a professor at the United Nations University in Malaysia, a United Nations General Assembly affiliated research institute and author of the study, told SBS News.
"The UN and governments are really critical to any form of effective regulation to prevent the misuse of AI," he said.
More than 75 countries or regions are currently using AI for surveillance.
Given the link between unemployment and “adverse health outcomes and behaviors, ” the study ’ s authors also warn of the health implications of unemployment as AI facilitates the automation of more types of work.
The creators of AI boast about its transformative potential, including in medicine and public health, but doctors are joining calls to stop developing AI until regulation can keep up with its progress.
How does artificial intelligence enable weapons development?
The authors of the study warn that artificial intelligence has enabled the development of lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS) to locate, select and attack human targets, all without human oversight.
"In theory, you could produce a van with hundreds of thousands of small autonomous weapons that could be targeted in a more discriminating way," Professor McCoy said.
The technology for this highly lethal weapon is relatively cheap, he added.
“We don ’ t know exactly who owns this technology or who is developing it.
“But I think it ’ s fair to say that there are governments around the world developing this technology, ” he said.
In 2021, the United Nations held talks on autonomous weapons, which did not start negotiations on an international treaty governing their use, but only agreed to continue discussions.
How does artificial intelligence contribute to the misuse of personal data?
The authors of the study say artificial intelligence has the ability to quickly clean up, organize and analyze massive data sets made up of personal data, including images.
They pointed to the role of AI in subverting democracy in the 2013 and 2017 Kenyan elections, the 2016 US presidential election, and the 2017 French presidential election.
“When combined with a rapidly improving ability to distort or distort reality, AI-powered information systems could further undermine democracy, cause a general breakdown of trust, or drive social divisions and conflict, with consequent public health implications, ” the authors said.
They argue that AI-driven surveillance could also be used by governments to oppress people more directly, such as China ’ s social credit system.
China ’ s social credit system, which combines facial recognition software with analysis of people ’ s financial transactions, activities, police records and social relationships, essentially allows the Chinese government to use a set of incentives and penalties to shape the behavior of its people.
Last week, Geoffrey Hinton, a pioneering computer scientist hailed as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” said he had left Google to talk freely about the dangers of the technology after realising that computers could become smarter than people faster than he and other experts expected.
In an interview with The New York Times, Hinton said he was concerned about the ability of AI to create convincing false images and texts, thereby creating a world where people "can no longer know what is real."
"It's hard to see how to prevent bad people from using it to do bad things," he said.
Download the app SBS Audio and follow Mandarin. You can also listen to and download SBS Mandarin audio stories anytime via Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, Spotify and other podcast platforms.
Please follow SBS Chinese for more Australian news.
Share
Published 10 May 2023 6: 18pm
By Madeleine Wedesweiler
Source: SBS
Available in other languages
Labels

The EU's AI regulation may set global standards, potentially benefiting the US through AI system licensing.

Title:

Content: Perkins Coie presented at Digital Hollywood's "AI Bill of Rights, Ethics & the Law" Summit, a one-day virtual conference that seeks to advance the conversation around the establishment of a national regulatory policy for artificial intelligence (AI). The October 19 event highlighted the tension between efforts to unleash a once-in-a-generation burst of innovation, while simultaneously safeguarding against the dangers and risk inherent in complex and still developing technologies.

Over the course of the summit, panelists discussed a wide range of topics, including government regulation versus industry self-regulation, generative AI and intellectual property (IP) rights, human interaction with AI, and balancing the benefits and risks of deepfakes, among others.

Marc Martin moderated the panel "US and EU Regulation of AI: What To Expect and How To Prepare." The panelists included Cass Matthews from Microsoft's Office of Responsible AI and Benoit Barre, a partner at Le16 Law in Paris.

Below are a few of the key questions and responses that stood out from the broader discussion.

Is there a need for government regulation of AI in the first place?

From the U.S. perspective, the panelists noted that regulations already exist that may apply to uses of AI technology (e.g., antidiscrimination laws, consumer protection laws, etc.), so we may not need to start from scratch when it comes to regulating AI. At the same time, however, there are novel aspects of AI that likely call for new regulations. Regardless of any regulations adopted by governments, the panelists noted that it remains important for companies to maintain their self-directed internal governance systems around the responsible use of AI.

From the EU perspective, the panelists observed that applying existing rules may be difficult given the complexity of AI, and even if existing rules are applied, such application may be done in diverging and fragmented ways, particularly within the context of dozens of member states independently trying to regulate AI. Accordingly, one of the main reasons the EU is working to adopt its AI Act is to have a common set of rules that build trust with users of AI technology and provide legal predictability to companies and investors. The panelists also noted that the AI Act would ensure that AI technology respects certain EU core values, another motivating factor behind the efforts to adopt the act.

Speaking of the AI Act, what is the status of this proposed legislation?

The panelists explained that important discussions among the EU Commission, EU Parliament, and EU Council (known as trilogues) began in June 2023 and are still underway. Whether the AI Act should adopt an approach that is purely risk-based or more technology-based (which will not only regulate AI systems but also their underlying AI models) lies at the heart of these discussions, according to the panelists. Generally speaking, most member-state governments (which are represented by the EU Council) want to retain the AI Act's risk-based approach, while the EU Parliament (whose members represent the people within each member state and thus tends to be more citizen-centric) wants to ensure individuals are protected against potential risks stemming from particular kinds of AI models.

From the U.S. perspective, the panelists encouraged the EU to avoid undoing the risk-based framework of the AI Act. If the proposed law continues in this direction, the panelists recommended that it should apply to advanced foundation models only, and the creation of a compute-based threshold may be a way to distinguish between those AI models that should be subject to the AI Act and those that should not.

Although the number of trilogues remains uncertain, there is anticipation that EU lawmakers will come to a final agreement by the end of 2023 (or before the next EU Parliament elections in June 2024). The AI Act will enter into force once its final text is published in the Official Journal of the European Union; two years after that, it will apply to those who are subject to its requirements.

What issues should governments focus on as they grapple with AI regulations?

The panelists agreed that it is important for the definitions in the AI Act—and any other forthcoming AI regulations more generally—to be properly scoped so that they do not inadvertently cover other technologies. Relatedly, the panelists explained how properly scoped definitions can help ensure regulations are "future proof"—that is, still applicable to AI technologies, even as this technology develops further. The panelists discussed how certain aspects of the AI Act are set up to account for this concern. For instance, the AI Office, which the AI Act contemplates establishing, can have a role in designing and implementing regulations and other secondary legislation to account for any changes in AI technology down the road.

What does the AI Act mean for the United States? How can companies prepare for the AI Act?

The panelists noted that, like General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the AI Act is likely to have global consequences, as it is set to become the first comprehensive AI regulation—but this is not necessarily a cause for concern in the United States. The panelists observed that the AI Act gets some important issues right, specifically its focus on a risk-based approach, the importance it places on internal governance, the requirements it imposes on companies to maintain robust risk and impact assessments, and the transparency requirements it calls for to ensure individuals understand where and how AI is being used. At the same time, however, the panelists observed that the AI Act's obligations should not be so onerous, nor scoped so broadly as to apply to all technology more generally.

The panelists also explained that, like GDPR, the AI Act is intended to be extraterritorial, so regardless of where a company is located, it will need to comply with the law once in effect. To be ready, companies should start early to build the right internal tools and processes they will need to assist with compliance, according to the panelists.

Should the United States create a new regulatory agency for AI?

The panelists noted that the United States likely could benefit from a licensing process for certain AI systems, particularly those based on highly capable AI models, to ensure that the right safeguards are in place. Accordingly, the panelists suggested that the United States could move in the direction of establishing a new regulatory agency for AI, which could oversee such a licensing process, among other duties.

Follow us on social media @PerkinsCoieLLP, and if you have any questions or comments, contact us here. We invite you to learn more about our Digital Media & Entertainment, Gaming & Sports industry group and check out our podcast: Innovation Unlocked: The Future of Entertainment.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

The regulation balances innovation with citizen rights protection.

Companies warn that the regulations may hinder AI innovation in Europe.

Title:

Content: • En
The world ’ s first draft of EU AI regulation is out, and European companies worry that it hinders innovation.
Illustration of AI (Photo by Reuters Dado Ruvic)
After three days of marathon negotiations, EU countries finally agreed on a draft Artificial Intelligence Act that would require any AI technology used within the EU to respect fundamental human rights, EU values, and ensure its security.
Preliminary announcements in the draft include:
1.
Develop specifications for high-impact general-purpose AI models and high-risk AI systems that may pose systemic risks in the future.
2.
Reform the governance system so that it has a certain enforcement power at the EU level.
3.
Expand the ban list, but law enforcement authorities can use AI for remote biometrics in public places, subject to relevant safeguards.
4.
Users of high-risk AI systems are obliged to conduct a basic rights impact assessment before the AI system is put into use to protect relevant rights and interests.
In fact, discussions on AI regulations have been going on in EU member states for many years, and it is hoped that clear rules can be drawn up to ensure “the best interests of humanity ”.
After three days of discussion this month, the Council of the European Union first proposed a framework for AI regulation in 2021, the draft prototype has already taken its first look.
Lawmakers agreed to set up a “two-stage ” system, with universal AI models such as ChatGPT open and transparent, while more capable AI is subject to stricter regulations.
In addition to the facial recognition system is limited to a small number of law enforcement agencies, it is strictly prohibited to use AI for “social scoring ” to avoid manipulating humans to engage in behaviors that violate their free will.
Companies that break the rules face fines of up to €35 million or even 7% of the company ’ s global earnings.
The European Union ’ s internal market commissioner, Thierry Breton, tweeted on X that it was a historic moment for the EU to officially become the first continent to set clear rules for the use of AI. The AI bill is not just a rule book, but a springboard for EU startups and researchers in the global AI race.
However, some companies worry that regulations may hinder the development of AI technology in Europe at a time when ChatGPT has launched and triggered a global wave of AI innovation. In June, companies including Airbus and Siemens protested that the initial disclosure of regulations makes innovation more difficult and does not help local businesses.
Updated: 2023-12-09 18: 38 GMT + 08: 00

The EU AI Act will have global consequences and apply to all companies, including those outside the EU.

Title:

Content: December 9, 2023

Ferrum College : Iron Blade Online

Complete Canadian News World

The European Union approves landmark rules on artificial intelligence

Open Editor’s Digest for free

EU lawmakers have approved the terms of landmark legislation to regulate artificial intelligence, moving forward with enacting the world’s most restrictive regime on the development of the technology.

Thierry Breton, European Union Commissioner, confirmed in a post on the X website that an agreement had been reached, describing it as a historic agreement. “The European Union has become the first continent to set clear rules for the use of artificial intelligence,” he wrote. “The AI Code is more than just a rulebook – it serves as a launching pad for EU startups and researchers to lead the global AI race.”

The deal came after years of discussions between member states and members of the European Parliament about the ways in which artificial intelligence should be curbed to put the interest of humanity at the heart of legislation. This came after marathon discussions that began on Wednesday of this week.

Details of the deal were still unfolding after the announcement. Breton said lawmakers agreed on a two-tiered approach, with “transparency requirements for all general-purpose AI models (such as ChatGPT)” as well as “stronger requirements for robust models with systemic impacts” across the EU.

Britton said the rules would implement safeguards for the use of AI technology while at the same time avoiding an “excessive burden” on companies.

Among the new rules, lawmakers agreed to impose strict limits on the use of facial recognition technology except for narrowly defined exceptions for law enforcement.

See also  Putin Delivers High-Level Speech in Russia: Live Updates

The legislation also includes a ban on the use of AI for “social scoring” — using metrics to determine how straight someone is — and AI systems that “manipulate human behavior to circumvent human free will.”

It is also prohibited to use artificial intelligence to exploit people who are vulnerable because of their age, disability, or economic situation.

Companies that do not comply with the rules face fines of 35 million euros, or 7 percent of global revenue.

Some technology groups were not happy. “We have a deal, but at what cost? We fully supported a risk-based approach based on the uses of AI, not the technology itself, but a last-minute attempt to regulate the underlying models,” said Cecilia Bonfield Dahl, managing director of DigitalEurope, which represents the continent’s technology sector. I turned this upside down.

“The new requirements – as well as other sweeping new laws like the Data Act – will require a lot of resources for companies to comply with, resources that will be spent on lawyers rather than hiring AI engineers.”

MEPs had spent years arguing over their position before starting negotiations with member states and the European Commission, the EU’s executive body. The three – national ministries, parliamentarians and the Commission – agreed on the final text on Friday night, allowing the legislation to become law.

European companies have expressed concern that overly restrictive rules imposed on the technology, which is rapidly evolving and gained more attention after OpenAI’s ChatGPT rollout, will hinder innovation. In June, dozens of the largest European companies, such as France’s Airbus and Germany’s Siemens, said the rules as they stood were too strict to foster innovation and help local industries.

See also  Live news updates: China's state media is stressing its zero-covid policy amid protests

Last month, the UK hosted a summit on AI safety, leading to wide-ranging commitments from 28 countries to work together to address existential risks posed by advanced AI. The event attracted leading technology figures such as OpenAI’s Sam Altman, who has previously criticized EU plans to regulate the technology.

Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, the EU’s executive body, praised lawmakers for the political agreement on AI rules.

“This is a historic moment,” she said. The Artificial Intelligence Law brings European values into a new era.

She added: “Until the law becomes fully enforceable, we will support companies and developers to anticipate the new rules. Nearly 100 companies have already expressed their interest in joining our AI Charter, under which they will commit on a voluntary basis to implement the key obligations of the law before the legal deadline.”