The salmon farming industry uses various additives in the feed during the farming process, including antibiotics, chemicals, and insect-based ingredients, which can contribute to marine pollution and have negative impacts on human health.

The use of antibiotics and chemicals in salmon farming has raised concerns about the impact on human health and the environment, with high-density farmed salmon being prone to disease and parasites like sea lice.

Additives such as fishmeal and fish oil are used in salmon farming, but their use has been linked to the depletion of wild fish stocks and the degradation of the marine environment.

Insect-based ingredients, such as mealworms, are being used as a sustainable alternative to traditional fishmeal, providing a valuable source of protein and essential amino acids for salmon.

The European Food Safety Agency has deemed insect-based ingredients safe for human consumption, and they can help reduce mortality rates in salmon farming and decrease the environmental impact of the industry.

However, the use of additives in salmon farming has also been linked to health concerns, including the presence of PCBs in farmed salmon, which can increase the risk of cancer.

Farmed salmon has been found to have higher levels of PCBs than wild salmon, with levels 8 times higher in some cases, and consumption of farmed salmon has been linked to an increased risk of prostate cancer in men.

The regulatory frameworks governing the use of additives in salmon farming vary between countries, with some countries having stricter regulations than others, and the Norwegian Aquaculture Act and the Aquaculture Stewardship Council are examples of regulatory frameworks that govern the use of additives in salmon farming.

The differences in regulatory frameworks between countries can impact the industry, environment, and human health, and have implications for global salmon trade and consumption.

In the United States, specifically in Maine, there are proposed regulations for finfish aquaculture, including stocking density limits and waste discharge laws, but no specific regulations for additives are mentioned.

In Norway, the Aquaculture Act regulates salmon farming, and there are certifications from organizations such as the Aquaculture Stewardship Council and the Marine Stewardship Council, but no specific regulations for additives are mentioned.

The RSPCA has welfare standards for farmed Atlantic salmon, and A Greener World certifies salmon farms, but no specific information is available on additives.

The use of additives in salmon farming is a complex issue, with both positive and negative impacts on human health and the environment, and requires careful regulation and monitoring.

The global salmon market is projected to grow, but the industry must balance its growth with the need to protect the environment and ensure the health and safety of consumers.

The regulatory frameworks for salmon farming additives in Norway, Canada, and Chile are not fully compared, but some information is available on the environmental and health impacts of salmon farming in these countries.

Norway is the world's largest exporter of salmon, and its aquaculture industry is subject to regulations and standards that may differ from those in other countries.

The Ministry of Fisheries monitors fishing products for safety, including the additives used in salmon farming, to ensure compliance with regulations.

The FDA monitors seafood imports, including salmon, for banned antibiotics and additives, and refuses contaminated products.

The FSSAI conducts surveillance on food items, including salmon, to ensure compliance with regulations, and non-compliance leads to penalties.

The EU monitors antitrust rules in salmon farming, and companies may face fines for non-compliance.

The Codex Alimentarius sets international food standards, including those for additives used in salmon farming, which are adopted by countries such as Zambia.

The consequences of non-compliance with regulations and standards for additives in salmon farming include severe fines, reputational damage, and permit revocation, as well as potential health risks to consumers.

The measures in place to monitor and enforce compliance with regulations and standards for additives in salmon farming include regular inspections, sampling, and testing, as well as public reporting and transparency.

The Scottish salmon sector is a significant contributor to the Scottish economy, delivering £760 million and supporting 10,000 workers, but faces challenges such as low unemployment and limited labor availability.

The Canadian salmon farming industry has shrunk by 40 per cent since 2020, due to factors such as climate change and regulatory decisions, and the closure of fish farms in the Discovery Islands region has reduced salmon supply by 40,000 tonnes.

The differences in regulatory frameworks between countries can have significant impacts on the industry, environment, and human health, and highlight the need for standardized regulations governing the use of additives in salmon farming.

The salmon farming industry uses various additives in the feed during the farming process, including antibiotics, chemicals, and insect-based ingredients, which can contribute to marine pollution and have negative impacts on human health.

Title:

Content: Alert
The first wave of large-scale private school exits has hit the "Carpentry School" with more directors and supervisors.
More than 70% of the mortgage can be borrowed from the central bank.
Remember to bring an umbrella after work! 11 counties and cities rain special report to fear the road to night
More than 300 people change their name to eat enough … your favorite salmon is abused and pollutes the sea? Netflix "Ocean Conspiracy" exposed to the black screen
In the past, more than 300 people in Taiwan changed their name after turning around the famous sushi restaurant “Sushi Lang ” to launch the“ Free Salmon to Eat ” campaign, setting off a “salmon chaos ” in society, showing the people ’ s love for salmon.
With Netflix ’ s new ecological crisis documentary “Seaspiracy ”, which exposes the problems of antibiotics released by“ sea captive salmon ” and fears of pollution, as well as millions of salmon crammed in underwater cages, mercilessly attacked by fish lice, and violating the nature of wild migration, people can ’ t help but look at the issue of animal persecution. It has been proven to sense pain.
What are the cruelties hidden in the world-famous seafood “farmed salmon ”?
How can fish welfare be improved?
More than 300 people changed their name to "salmon" to eat! The salmon that Taiwanese love to eat is not wild at all.
As with many livestock farms on the land, salmon is of high economic value, so many aquaculture operators around the world use sea box nets to trap and breed salmon in captivity, and regularly feed them to pipelines in order to obtain huge "salmon gold" business opportunities.
If you look at Taiwan from a perspective, according to the statistics of customs imports and exports in 2020, the weight of locally imported “captive salmon ” alone is as high as 18,000 tons, with a total value of about NT $5.15 billion.
On the other hand, even if the world is hit by the epidemic in 2020, Norway, the world ’ s largest exporter of salmon, not only will the production of salmon still reach 1.1 million tons, but the export volume will also reach a record second high.
But with the release of Netflix ’ s new marine crisis documentary “Seaspiracy ” in 2023, the blood-soaked disclosure of the sea farming salmon behind the following three unknown dark sides, finally let the terrible“ salmon hell ” shake the world.
1.
High-density farmed salmon have nowhere to escape! Scales and fins are mercilessly devoured by sea lice parasites
Compared to free wild salmon, captive salmon are likely to be crowded together by the fish, constantly colliding, friction, conflict, and nowhere to hide, resulting in scales, kisses, and fins are broken, infectious anemia, spinal deformities and other symptoms, and are more likely to be parasitized by sea lice.
For example, a survey by the global animal lobby welfare organization Compassion in World Farming found that floating dead fish can be found everywhere in crowded salmon farms, and such a harsh living environment is simply a hotbed for the spread of disease.
What is even more frightening is that once the salmon is entangled in sea lice, the scales, skin tissue, surface mucus and blood on the body will soon become food for the parasites.
As the scales of the salmon gradually disappear, in addition to the pain of the body beginning to erode, the pain of infection in the wound or loss of immunity can also plunge them into the abyss of death.
For example, in the clip of "The Ocean Conspiracy", it directly captures the horror of the salmon being eaten alive by a parasite to the eyes, the limbs, and the body.
2.
Marine farmed salmon put into chemicals, antibiotics! Marine pollution affects ecological food chain
In order to solve the salmon nightmare, farmers have to put a lot of irritating chemicals and antibiotics into the box to remove sea lice and reduce the risk of disease in high-density breeding, or to increase the water temperature and try to kill sea lice.
But the pumps and containers used by the former to transport chemicals have undoubtedly made the salmon's sea cages smaller and tighter, while the temperature of the latter has already exceeded the range that the salmon can adapt to, and each of them has brought great pain to the salmon.
At the same time, antibiotics and pesticides flowing into the sea will of course lead to pollution of the surrounding environment, and the organic waste generated by captive salmon will also seriously affect the entire bottom ecology.
In April 2023, the environmental group Greenpeace accused Chile ’ s salmon farming industry of dumping sewage into the ocean, killing more than 5,000 tons of salmon from oxidation.
3.
Undersea cages violate the migratory nature of wild salmon! Millions of animals are ignored
Not only that, Scotland, the world ’ s third largest Atlantic salmon farming exporter, which supplies about 10% of Taiwan ’ s salmon imports each year, has also been raised by the farm animal protection group Compassion in World Farming (CIWF) at the end of 2020, pointing directly to the 22 farms of the local five largest salmon farming companies, and raising millions of salmon in the sea bottom in one breath, completely depriving them of their migratory nature.
Because the migratory nature of salmon has always been a mystery in the animal world, some studies have suggested that salmon can always find the "origin" by remembering the special smell of their birthplace, or by being guided by the magnetic fields of the Sun and Earth.
Regardless of the truth, the physiological structure of salmon is obviously sensitive to sensing the environment, judging the location, and even evading electric shocks in real time.
Therefore, allowing them to roam aimlessly in the box for many years is a kind of cruelty to the body and spirit, depriving the fish instinct of long-distance migration.
All the unhealthy salmon raised in captivity are eaten by humans!
Food chain security in jeopardy
In other words, the three major concerns of captive salmon at sea have caused more than 25% of Scotland ’ s fish populations to suffer and die before they are slaughtered, resulting in a huge waste of food and a complete disregard for animal welfare.
In addition, countless dead fish have been dumped directly in open barrels by Scottish farmers, allowing wild birds and other wildlife to come into contact for food, potentially endangering the safety of other ecological chains.
Salmon farming on land is more humane to the earth! Salmon business opportunities and marine conservation to create food sustainability
Fortunately, this traditional salmon farming method is expected to gradually come to an end.
Because the international company Atlantic Sapphire has been developing "land salmon farm" for 10 years, and in 2022, it invested nearly 4 billion US dollars (about 112 billion US dollars) to build the world's largest land salmon farm Bluehouse in Florida, the United States.
The biggest feature of the land salmon farm is the use of the Recirculating Aquaculture System (RAS) to effectively control the temperature, salinity, pH and oxygen content of the water body, and effectively eliminate carbon dioxide and filter waste, to ensure that the salmon are free from parasites and diseases, while reducing the possibility of marine pollution.
Johan Andreassen, CEO of Atlantic Sapphire: “Ten years ago no one believed that farming salmon on land was financially viable; now Atlantic Sapphire is finally proving that it works, so the question now is how much competition there will be and how much scale there will be in this industry. ”
In order to prove that land-based salmon farming will eventually become a trend in the marine industry, Atlantic Sapphire CEO Johan Andreassen is also looking further into the future, with an estimated 372,000 square meters of fish tanks on about 650,000 square meters of land by 2031, allowing land-based salmon to meet 41% of the annual salmon consumption in the United States.
Also thanks to Atlantic Sapphire, one of the world ’ s largest salmon producers, Norwegian company Grieg Seafood has entered into a joint venture with Årdal Aqua to build a 5,000-tonne annual land farm there.
Salmon Evolution, also from Norway, joined forces with Dongwon Industries, South Korea ’ s largest seafood company, in 2023 to expand its “salmon footprint ” to South Korea.
At the same time, Benchmark Genetics, an aquaculture company that has always strictly controlled the quality of salmon eggs, now sells up to 10% of its salmon eggs to the land-based farming industry to improve the yield and quality of “land-based captive salmon. ”
People from all walks of life, through their own efforts, hope to work for the welfare of salmon, no longer be poisoned by the lust of human words, even if they reproduce artificially, they can also maintain their physical and mental health, and achieve the true meaning of "sustainable food" on earth.
Extended reading:
Taitung version roasted sushi to eat raw meat? Ami youth innovates traditional cuisine with Japanese soul
24 / 7 APP monitoring of Taiwan 's sea bream! Yunlin' s "0 turtle pond" creates 42 times more than 300 million business opportunities
(This article is from the 2023.07.02 "Vision" website and is prohibited from reproducing without consent.)
Salmon Sushi Lang Switching Sushi Netflix
Related News
We can cool down! 11 counties and cities have been warned to rain into the night.
The weather is hot, and an afternoon thunderstorm can cool down slightly.
The weather bureau issued a special report on heavy rain in 11 counties and cities in Taoyuan at 15: 45.
More than 300 people change their name to eat enough … your favorite salmon is abused and pollutes the sea? Netflix "Ocean Conspiracy" exposed to the black screen
In the past, more than 300 people in Taiwan changed their name after turning around the famous sushi restaurant “Sushi Lang ” to launch the“ Free Salmon to Eat ” campaign, setting off a “salmon chaos ” in society, showing the people ’ s love for salmon.
With Netflix ’ s new ecological crisis documentary “Seaspiracy ”, which exposes the problems of antibiotics released by“ sea captive salmon ” and fears of pollution, as well as millions of salmon crammed in underwater cages, mercilessly attacked by fish lice, and violating the nature of wild migration, people can ’ t help but look at the issue of animal persecution. It has been proven to sense pain.
What are the cruelties hidden in the world-famous seafood “farmed salmon ”?
How can fish welfare be improved?
Study: Brain shrinks from 17,000 years ago
As the climate changes, species evolve to change their physiological structures to adapt to the climate, but not necessarily for the better.
An analysis of 50,000 years of climate records and human remains has revealed an adaptive response to a decrease in human brain size, possibly due to environmental stress caused by higher temperatures around 15,000 years ago.
Summer infection and heatstroke cases may peak, man's body temperature is 41.8 degrees and he is in a coma.
According to the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the number of heat injuries from January to June this year reached 956, a new high in three years.
Dr. Kao Wei-feng, chief physician of the Department of Emergency Medicine at the Taipei Medical University Hospital...
A picture of the weather! "Hot Roasted Potato" Relaxed This Afternoon Thunderstorm Until the Weekend
The temperature in Yuli Township, Hualien County was the highest today at 38.3 degrees.
The Central Weather Bureau issued a high temperature signal for tomorrow's 12 counties and cities in the afternoon, but starting tomorrow,...
Taiwan Railway R200 diesel locomotive unveiled
Taiwan Railway 's new R200 diesel-electric locomotive was officially unveiled at a new car meeting in Changhua Fan Garage this afternoon. Minister of Communications Wang Guocai said that Taiwan Railway has compiled a 100 billion yuan car purchase plan in recent years.
udn Forum
Product recommendation

What has the release of Netflix's ecological crisis documentary "Seaspiracy"  exposed?

The pollution risks associated with antibiotics used in sea-farmed salmon.

What health concerns are there specifically related to additives in farmed salmon feed?

The use of antibiotics and chemicals in salmon farming has raised concerns about the impact on human health and the environment, with high-density farmed salmon being prone to disease and parasites like sea lice.

What has the release of Netflix's ecological crisis documentary "Seaspiracy"  exposed?

The pollution risks associated with antibiotics used in sea-farmed salmon.

What health concerns are there specifically related to additives in farmed salmon feed?

Additives such as fishmeal and fish oil are used in salmon farming, but their use has been linked to the depletion of wild fish stocks and the degradation of the marine environment.

Title:

Content: Ad

The EU must not support intensive fish farming — it's not sustainable

Free Article

The Hungarian presidency of the Council of the European Union, which will run between 1 July and 31 December 2024, has announced in its programme that it will pay particular attention to the development of “sustainable and competitive aquaculture”, arguing that “it is the animal protein production sector with the smallest environmental footprint.”

Beyond a supposedly low carbon footprint, aquaculture is also presented as an alternative to mitigate declining wild fish catches. However, under the term “aquaculture” we find various production models – some of which are more environmentally benign when conducted at appropriate scale, such as the cultivation of mussels, clams, and oysters, and some of which come with significant damaging impacts.

Many European consumers who want to eat fish from sustainable sources believe farmed salmon, trout and seabass are sustainable choices. But the intensive farming of carnivorous fin fish is neither socially nor environmentally sustainable.

The environmental impacts of this industrial production model include an increase in harmful algal blooms, a negative impact on sea grass meadows due to the accumulation of organic matter around farms, mass fish die-offs, the use of the harmful substances such as carcinogenic formaldehyde or antibiotics, and water pollution, creating dead zones on the sea bed underneath the farms. Adding to this, carnivorous farmed fish such as salmon and seabass require high volumes of fishmeal and fish oil from wild-caught fish in their feed.

In Europe, industrial aquaculture of carnivorous fish at sea is damaging the environment and displacing traditional activities such as coastal small-scale fisheries.

On the island of Poros, Greece, for example, the plan is to increase the area dedicated to open net pen carnivorous fish farms by 28 times. Yet, underwater video depicts that marine ecosystem near the current small-scale pens is completely dead from the waste and pollution of the farms, and local professional fishermen attest to a loss of wild fish since the influx of fish farms.

Beyond Europe, the production of fishmeal and fish oil necessary to feed carnivorous farmed fish is depleting wild fish stocks. This is the case in West Africa where the overfishing of small pelagics such as sardines and mackerel for industrial fish farms in Europe is undermining food security and the livelihoods of small-scale fishers and women fish-processors. Fish is taken away from people in low-income countries to feed the farmed fish which will be consumed in wealthy nations.

The UN special rapporteur on the right to food acknowledged this in his report to the Human Rights Council in early 2024: “Many farmed fish are carnivorous species that require feed products harvested from wild fish stock, thereby creating another source of pressure on wild fish stocks and disrupting ecosystems.

Moreover, global feed companies are exacerbating food insecurity in some communities. For example, over half a million tons of pelagic fish that could feed over 33 million people in the region are instead extracted from the ocean along the coast of West Africa and converted to fishmeal and fish oil, primarily in order to feed farmed fish and livestock, mostly in Asia and Europe.”

The current EU strategy for aquaculture does not respond to the social and environmental challenges posed by this sector and fails to clearly define what “sustainable” aquaculture is. In fact, in a special report on aquaculture, the European Court of Auditors (ECA) found that the European Union has been pouring funds into the development of aquaculture with little proof that this has contributed to the sector’s “environmental and social sustainability or its competitiveness.” The ECA report further highlights that “there are currently no indicators available to monitor the environmental sustainability of EU aquaculture.”

Under the agriculture and fisheries agenda, Hungary has reaffirmed its wish to support farmers, and fish farmers, through a “farmer-friendly European food system.” Rather they should support low impact small-scale fishers as primary food producers.

Under the Hungarian presidency, the EU should discontinue support for industrial aquaculture of carnivorous species and instead promote more sustainable small-scale aquaculture options that can co-exist instead of negatively affecting small-scale fisheries in Europe and beyond. If Europe wants to be a model in sustainable ocean governance, it must place small-scale, low-impact fisheries and aquaculture at the heart of its food policy.

This is an open letter signed by the following organisations from Africa and Europe: African Confederation of Artisanal Fisheries Organisations (CAOPA), Coalition for Fair Fisheries Arrangements (CFFA), Feedback Europe, Low Impact Fishers of Europe (LIFE), Compassion in World Farming and the Rauch Foundation.

Disclaimer

This article is sponsored by a third party. All opinions in this article reflect the views of the author and not of EUobserver.

Author Bio

The Coalition for Fair Fisheries Arrangements is a platform of European and African organisations that raises awareness about the impacts of the EU-Africa fisheries agreements on artisanal fishing communities.

Tags

Author Bio

The Coalition for Fair Fisheries Arrangements is a platform of European and African organisations that raises awareness about the impacts of the EU-Africa fisheries agreements on artisanal fishing communities.

Ad

Related articles

Ad
Ad

Insect-based ingredients, such as mealworms, are being used as a sustainable alternative to traditional fishmeal, providing a valuable source of protein and essential amino acids for salmon.

Title:

Content: World’s Largest Insect Farm to Open in France

Once fully operational, the massive vertical farm will produce 200,000 tonnes of insect-based ingredients a year.

Ÿnsect, one of the world’s largest insect rangers, is betting big on bugs to help push the world in a more sustainable direction.

Founded in 2011, the company is fast approaching its goal of opening the world’s largest insect farm and dramatically scaling up its operations. Located about an hour north of Paris, the state-of-the-art facility will leverage automated systems and vertical farming techniques to raise mealworms (Tenebrio molitor) and enable the production of over 200,000 tonnes of insect-based ingredients per year. The site, estimated to be completed by the end of 2022, will join two other Ÿnsect facilities already operational in France and the Netherlands.

"It’s an automated warehouse, very similar to an Amazon warehouse, where instead of storing stuff, we are storing live insects," Ÿnsect CEO and co-founder Antoine Hubert told Time last year. "There is a climate-control system which is highly complex to maintain temperature and moisture from zero to 30 meters high. All operations are automated. Anything that you do on [an insect] farm is done with robots."

Feed for Fish, Fertilizer for Plants, Burgers for Humans

For the past decade, mealworms cultivated at Ÿnsect’s farms have been turned into powders and oils that have become nutritional additives to pet and farm feeds. Thanks to a ruling last year by the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) that deemed mealworms safe for human consumption, the company has also begun selling its powders for shakes, cereal bars, pasta, and even alt-meat burgers. In addition, the shed shells of the rapidly growing mealworms are collected and sold as beneficial organic fertilizers to farmers.

According to MealFlour, a project that promotes mealworm farming as a way to battle malnutrition in Guatemala, a serving of mealworm powder is 55% protein, contains all essential amino and fatty acids, and has more iron than sirloin beef. Compared to the production of milk, pork, chicken, and beef, mealworms are also more sustainable and require fewer resources and energy.

While its recent forays into human foodstuffs have garnered attention, Ÿnsect's focus presently remains on helping to feed sustainably the animals that feed the world. For instance, aquaculture, like salmon farming, is a resource-intensive operation that uses both land-based crops (soy) and massive amounts of wild-caught fish to create what's known as fishmeal. With food production projected to have to grow by more than 70% by 2050 to meet demand, the overfishing of oceans to feed aquaculture operations is not a feasible option. Studies, such as a recent trial by NOAA, have shown that supplementing or even replacing fishmeal with insect- and plant-based foods holds promise for eliminating the need for wild-caught sources. According to Hubert, there are other positives as well.

"They [salmon] were reaching the maturity stage faster and eating less so they were avoiding a large quantity of feed," he told Fast Company in 2020. "There was less mortality so the farmers get more fish eventually than before... This also explains why we have a carbon-negative balance, because we are avoiding so many quantities of inputs to feed fish to have the same quantities of fish."

Hubert added to Fast Company that Ÿnsect has contracts worth more than $100 million with fish feed producers. This past year, with the acquisition of U.S.-based mealworm producer Jord, it also began entering new markets, such as the rapidly growing U.S. backyard chicken feed market.

A Record-Breaking Vertical Farm

One look at the animated video of Ÿnsect’s new facility up above and you can see why it’s been touted as an automated marvel. Mealworms will be reared by robots in stacked tubs stretching several stories tall. Unlike other insect food alternatives such as flies or crickets, mealworms do not hop or fly, allowing the company to maximize the space available.

In an effort to make sure the creatures are ethically farmed, Hubert reached out to philosophers from the Sorbonne University to judge their welfare. As he told The Guardian, the students determined that the mealworms had "more in common with mushroom-growing and hothousing vegetables" than with livestock.

"They have no brain in the strict sense of the word," he said. "We know they have a reflex reaction and they communicate and build intelligent structures, but nobody has shown they feel anything. However, what is important is to respect them as living organisms, which we do."

In addition to the new farm in France, Ÿnsect plans to continue to scale its operations with additional facilities, including a major site in the U.S. The biggest hurdle ahead, however, says Hubert, is making insects a normal part of everyday diets.

"I believe that the big challenge is accepting insects as part of the human diet," he told Authority Magazine. "A large part of the world's population eats insects, but we must be able to prove its properties and its benefits for the environment in order to reach more and have more impact!"

View Article Sources
  1. "Ÿnsect Welcomes European Interministerial Delegation to Amiens." Ynsect.

  2. "Why Eat Mealworms?" MealFlour.

  3. "Edible Insects." Food and Agriculture Organization.

  4. van Dijk, Michiel, et al. "A Meta-Analysis of Projected Global Food Demand and Population At Risk of Hunger for the Period 2010–2050." Nature Food, vol. 2, no. 7, 2021, pp. 494-501., doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00322-9

  5. "The Future of Fish Feed May Lie in Insects, Mold, and Algae." National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The European Food Safety Agency has deemed insect-based ingredients safe for human consumption, and they can help reduce mortality rates in salmon farming and decrease the environmental impact of the industry.

However, the use of additives in salmon farming has also been linked to health concerns, including the presence of PCBs in farmed salmon, which can increase the risk of cancer.

Title:

Content: Miscellaneous
Publish Date: December 13, 2021 8: 47 GMT
Updated on: December 13, 2021 9: 40 GMT
Study: Eating Too Much ‘ Farm Salmon ’ May Cause Cancer
A medical study published on Monday warned that overeating salmon raised in farm ponds could lead to cancer.
The Daily Newspaper noted.
+ A -A
Source: Erm News
A medical study published on Monday warned that overeating salmon raised in farm ponds could lead to cancer.
The Daily Express newspaper pointed out that "some previous studies found that salmon, jam in ponds, which is widely consumed around the world, doubles the risk of prostate cancer," pointing out that "salmon is a useful food source for health because it contains omega-3 fatty acids."
"While one salmon is caught in open water, like the seas, the other is bred in tight spaces (farms and ponds), which could have implications for human health," the paper said.
Studies have found that PCBs in farm-raised salmon were about 8 times higher than concentrations in wild salmon, adding that PCBs have been banned for commercial use for decades, but their effects can still be found in the environment, which may adversely affect human diet and therefore health.
According to a study by the Environmental Defense Fund, eating salmon raised in farm ponds on a regular basis may increase the risk of cancer after multiple cases of contamination have been detected in the United States and other countries.
"Medical scientific findings, published in the Journal of Medical Sciences, suggest that cheap farmed salmon sold in stores may do more harm than good."
“Risk analysis suggests that consumption of farmed Atlantic salmon may pose health risks that detract from the beneficial effects of fish consumption, ” the study said.
Eating farmed salmon more than once a month may be enough to increase the risk of cancer.
"In multivariate analyses, men with the highest concentrations of PCBs were twice as likely to develop prostate cancer than men with the lowest concentrations."
Download Erm News app on your phone

What health concerns are there specifically related to additives in farmed salmon feed?

Farmed salmon has been found to have higher levels of PCBs than wild salmon, with levels 8 times higher in some cases, and consumption of farmed salmon has been linked to an increased risk of prostate cancer in men.

What health concerns are there specifically related to additives in farmed salmon feed?

The regulatory frameworks governing the use of additives in salmon farming vary between countries, with some countries having stricter regulations than others, and the Norwegian Aquaculture Act and the Aquaculture Stewardship Council are examples of regulatory frameworks that govern the use of additives in salmon farming.

Title:

Content: DUBLIN, March 9, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- The "Global Salmon Market, By Species, By Fish Type, By Distribution Channel, By Product Type, Estimation & Forecast, 2017 - 2027" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The global salmon market held a market value of USD 20,880.5 Million in 2021 and is projected to reach USD 27,344.0 Million by the year 2027. The market is anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 4.6% from 2022 to 2027. Approximately, 3,282.72 kilo tons of salmon was estimated to be sold in 2021.

Salmon is a common name for a Salmonidae family's species of the ray-finned fish. The market is expected to be driven by the rising prevalence of chronic conditions and global rise in penetration of e-commerce sector. Furthermore, rise in consumer awareness towards the health benefits of salmon are also expected to contribute to the market growth.

Despite the driving factors, depletion of sea species are anticipated to hinder the market growth. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the market was negatively impacted due to closure of fishing activities and hence, decrease in the supply of salmon in global markets.

Growth Influencers:

Rise in consumer awareness towards the health benefits of salmon

Salmon provides various health benefits. It is rich in Omega-3 fatty acids, is a great source of protein, high in Vitamin B, good source of potassium, loaded with selenium, contains astaxanthin, reduced the risk of heart diseases, helps in weight management, helps to fight inflammation, and protects brain health. Consumers are getting aware regarding all these benefits, which is increasing its adoption, hence boosting the market growth.

Competitive Landscape

Major players in the global salmon market include Cermaq Group ASA, Leroy Seafood Group ASA, Mowi ASA, SalMar ASA, AquaChile, Cooke Aquaculture, Bakkafrost, Grieg Seafood, Multiexport, Blumar, Salmones Camanchaca, Australis Seafoods, Nova Sea, Tassal Group, Sinkaberg-Hansen, Nordlaks, Bremnes Seashore, Norway Royal Salmon, Alsaker Fjordbruk, and Other Prominent Players.

These market players are involved in collaborations, mergers & acquisitions, and new product launches, among other initiatives, to strengthen their market presence. For instance, in January 2022, Benchmark Animal Health and Cermaq received funding from the Research Council of Norway for research and development of Tenacibaculum vaccines for Salmon. Furthermore, Bekkafrost collaborated with the salmon industry through the Faroe Fish Farmer's Association And Global Salmon Initiative (GSI).

The global Salmon market report provides insights on the below pointers:

  • Market Penetration: Provides comprehensive information on the market offered by the prominent players
  • Market Development: The report offers detailed information about lucrative emerging markets and analyzes penetration across mature segments of the markets
  • Market Diversification: Provides in-depth information about untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments
  • Competitive Landscape Assessment: Mergers & acquisitions, certifications, product launches in the global Salmon market have been provided in this research report. In addition, the report also emphasizes the SWOT analysis of the leading players.
  • Product Development & Innovation: The report provides intelligent insights on future technologies, R&D activities, and breakthrough product developments
  • Global Salmon Production: Total Harvest of Atlantic Salmon, 2016-2020
  • Salmon Production Cost Breakdown
  • Consumer Behavior Analysis: By Region, By Age, By Gender, By Annual Household Income, Seasonal of Fish
  • Fresh Salmon Export: Trends & Predictions for the Supply of Salmon Consumed (USD Million) in the United States; Largest Fishing Companies
  • Regulatory Landscape: Section 6 of Norwegian Aquaculture Act , Aquaculture Stewardship Council Salmon standard, RSPCA welfare standards for Farmed Atlantic salmon, A Greener World (AGW), Marine Stewardship Council (MSC)

The global Salmon market report answers questions such as:

  • What is the market size and forecast of the Global Salmon Market?
  • What are the inhibiting factors and impact of COVID-19 on the Global Salmon Market during the assessment period?
  • Which are the products/segments/applications/areas to invest in over the assessment period in the Global Salmon Market?
  • What is the competitive strategic window for opportunities in the Global Salmon Market?
  • What are the technology trends and regulatory frameworks in the Global Salmon Market?
  • What is the market share of the leading players in the Global Salmon Market?
  • What modes and strategic moves are considered favorable for entering the Global Salmon Market?

Key Topics Covered:

Chapter 1. Research Framework

Chapter 2. Executive Summary: Global Salmon Market

Chapter 3. Global Salmon Market Overview

3.1. Industry Value Chain Analysis

3.1.1. Raw Material

3.1.2. Processing and Packaging

3.1.3. Distributor

3.1.4. End User

3.2. Industry Outlook

3.2.1. Global Salmon Production

3.2.2. Salmon Production Cost Breakdown

3.2.3. Fresh Salmon Export

3.2.4. Consumer Behavior Analysis

3.2.4.1. Income

3.2.4.2. Occupation

3.2.4.3. Seasonal of Fish

3.2.5. Trends and Predictions for the Supply of Salmon Consumed in the United States

3.2.6. Largest Fishing Companies

3.3. PESTLE Analysis

3.4. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

3.4.1. Bargaining Power of Suppliers

3.4.2. Bargaining Power of Buyers

3.4.3. Threat of Substitutes

3.4.4. Threat of New Entrants

3.4.5. Degree of Competition

3.5. Market Dynamics and Trends

3.5.1. Key Trends

3.5.2. Growth Drivers

3.5.3. Restraints/ Challenges

3.6. Market Growth and Outlook

3.6.1. Market Revenue Estimates and Forecast (US$ Mn), 2017-2027

3.6.2. Market Volume Estimates and Forecast (MMT), 2017-2027

3.6.3. Pricing Analysis

3.7. Covid-19 Impact Assessment on Market Growth Trend

3.7.1. Growth Trend Shift Analysis

3.7.2. Industry Best Practices

3.8. Regulatory Landscape

Chapter 4. Competition Dashboard

4.1. Market Concentration Rate

4.2. Company Market Share Analysis (Value %), 2020

4.3. Competitor Mapping

Chapter 5. Salmon Market Analysis, By Species

5.1. Key Insights

5.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

5.2.1. Atlantic

5.2.2. Pink

5.2.3. Chum/Dog

5.2.4. Coho

5.2.5. Sockeye

5.2.6. Others

Chapter 6. Salmon Market Analysis, By Fish Type

6.1. Key Insights

6.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

6.2.1. Farmed

6.2.2. Wild

Chapter 7. Salmon Market Analysis, By Product Type

7.1. Key Insights

7.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

7.2.1. Canned

7.2.2. Fresh

7.2.3. Frozen

7.2.4. Others

Chapter 8. Salmon Market Analysis, By Retail

8.1. Key Insights

8.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

8.2.1. Retail

8.2.1.1. E-commerce (online)

8.2.1.2. Brick & Mortar Stores (offline)

8.2.2. HoReCa & Wholesale

8.2.3. Processed Food Industry

8.2.4. Other Institutional Customers

Chapter 9. Salmon Market Analysis, By Region

9.1. Key Insights

9.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

9.2.1. North America

9.2.1.1. The U.S.

9.2.1.2. Canada

9.2.1.3. Mexico

9.2.2. Europe

9.2.2.1. Western Europe

9.2.2.1.1. The UK

9.2.2.1.2. Germany

9.2.2.1.3. France

9.2.2.1.4. Italy

9.2.2.1.5. Spain

9.2.2.1.6. Rest of Western Europe

9.2.2.2. Eastern Europe

9.2.2.2.1. Poland

9.2.2.2.2. Russia

9.2.2.2.3. Rest of Eastern Europe

9.2.3. Asia Pacific

9.2.3.1. China

9.2.3.2. India

9.2.3.3. Japan

9.2.3.4. Australia & New Zealand

9.2.3.5. ASEAN

9.2.3.6. Rest of Asia Pacific

9.2.4. Middle East & Africa

9.2.4.1. UAE

9.2.4.2. Saudi Arabia

9.2.4.3. South Africa

9.2.4.4. Rest of MEA

9.2.5. South America

9.2.5.1. Argentina

9.2.5.2. Brazil

9.2.5.3. Rest of South America

Chapter 10. North America Salmon Market Analysis

10.1. Key Insights

10.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

10.2.1. By Species

10.2.2. By Type

10.2.3. By Product

10.2.4. By Distribution Channel

10.2.5. By Country

Chapter 11. Europe Salmon Market Analysis

11.1. Key Insights

11.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

11.2.1. By Species

11.2.2. By Type

11.2.3. By Product

11.2.4. By Distribution Channel

11.2.5. By Country

Chapter 12. Asia Pacific Salmon Market Analysis

12.1. Key Insights

12.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

12.2.1. By Species

12.2.2. By Type

12.2.3. By Product

12.2.4. By Distribution Channel

12.2.5. By Country

Chapter 13. Middle East and Africa Salmon Market Analysis

13.1. Key Insights

13.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

13.2.1. By Species

13.2.2. By Type

13.2.3. By Product

13.2.4. By Distribution Channel

13.2.5. By Country

Chapter 14. South America Salmon Market Analysis

14.1. Key Insights

14.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2017 - 2027 (US$ Mn & MMT)

14.2.1. By Species

14.2.2. By Type

14.2.3. By Product

14.2.4. By Distribution Channel

14.2.5. By Country

Chapter 15. Company Profile (Company Overview, Financial Matrix, Key Product landscape, Key Personnel, Key Competitors, Contact Address, and Business Strategy Outlook) *

15.1. Cremaq Group ASA

15.2. Leroy Seafood Group ASA

15.3. Mowi ASA

15.4. SalMar ASA

15.5. AquaChile

15.6. Cooke Aquaculture

15.7. Bakkafrost

15.8. Grieg Seafood

15.9. Multiexport

15.10. Blumar

15.11. Salmones Camanchaca

15.12. Australis Seafoods

15.13. Nova Sea

15.14. Tassal Group

15.15. Sinkaberg-Hansen

15.16. Nordlaks

15.17. Bremnes Seashore

15.18. Norway Royal Salmon

15.19. Alsaker Fjordbruk

15.20. Other Prominent players

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/di479t

Media Contact:

Research and Markets

Laura Wood, Senior Manager

press@researchandmarkets.com

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470

For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630

For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907

Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-salmon-market-to-2027---by-species-fish-type-distribution-channel-product-type-and-region-301498918.html

SOURCE Research and Markets

DISCLAIMER FOR COMMENTS: The views expressed by public comments are not those of this company or its affiliated companies. Please note by clicking on "Post" you acknowledge that you have read the TERMS OF USE and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Your comments may be used on air. Be polite. Inappropriate posts or posts containing offsite links, images, GIFs, inappropriate language, or memes may be removed by the moderator. Job listings and similar posts are likely automated SPAM messages from Facebook and are not placed by WFMZ-TV.

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

The differences in regulatory frameworks between countries can impact the industry, environment, and human health, and have implications for global salmon trade and consumption.

In the United States, specifically in Maine, there are proposed regulations for finfish aquaculture, including stocking density limits and waste discharge laws, but no specific regulations for additives are mentioned.

Title:

Content: Lawmakers in Maine -- home to aquaculture producer Cooke and land-based yellowtail farmer Kingfish --are continuing to call for stricter regulations when it comes to current and future aquaculture leases.

The latest set of proposals come from Maine Democratic Sen. Nicole Grohoski, who has two bills in the works aimed at regulating the industry.

The first proposal from Grohoski would ask the state's Commissioner of Marine Resources to not issue a lease for marine finfish aquaculture if the stocking density exceeds 22 kilograms per cubic meter or if the biomass exceeds 780 metric tons. The measure would also apply to current leases under the current version of the bill.

That bill is scheduled to have a public hearing on Thursday.

"Arbitrarily changing stocking limits through legislation may simply restrict a producer’s ability to introduce new technologies and innovative equipment which otherwise enables aquaculture farms to operate even more sustainably," Joel Richardson, Cooke's vice president of public relations, told IntraFish.

If passed, he added, any existing or future fish farming companies in Maine would be impacted by the legislation.

While Richardson did not comment on the stocking densities at Cooke's salmon aquaculture facilities in Maine, the state's Department of Marine Resources lists the company as having 24 licenses active aquaculture leases in the state.

"The salmon farms of today have improved significantly from the farms of decades ago," Richardson said. "In our experience, some legislative changes can be counterproductive and do not typically keep up with the rapid pace of technological advancement in the aquaculture sector.

"One of the key reasons why Maine has been successful in aquaculture growth is that the state, academia, industry and communities work collaboratively to establish the associated regulatory policy and legislation."

The lawmaker's other active bill would direct the state's Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to review state laws and rules regulating the licensing of waste discharges from proposed finfish aquaculture facilities, including any waste discharge modeling requirements or standards.

“On-water finfish farming is not what it was decades ago," the senator said of the legislation in a statement, adding she was working to protect both the state's coast and the livelihoods of its lobstermen.

"Nor are our coastal marine environments as healthy as they once were. This bill will move Maine in the right direction as we ensure our regulations are up to date with modern practices, so we can protect the health of our cold, clean waters.”

That bill received a divided committee report, with nine members in favor and four against, reported the local news site Mount Deseret Islander. A majority vote is needed to move the bill out of committee for House and Senate review, the news site said.

The latest of many

This is not the first time this year that strict measures have been proposed by Maine legislators for aquaculture. In March, a measure brought forward by a different Maine senator sought to place strict new regulations on land-based aquaculture facilities in the state.

While that proposal died in committee following significant industry outcry, the state's aquaculture industry remains on edge, with local opposition from residents and lawmakers having the ability to significantly hinder projects.

"As with many bills you see proposed, while it may not directly impact all aquaculture producers, they can set a precedent for unreasonable regulations in future," Megan Sorby, an operations manager for Maine's land-based yellowtail producer The Kingfish Company, told IntraFish of legislation such as Sen. Grohoski's.

She pointed to the senator's proposal to limit stocking densities as being in conflict with the current regulatory decisions, which are "driven by the unique environmental conditions at each farm site and the sites’ ability to process the nutrients coming out of the farm."

"Each site is different and Maine’s environmental monitoring regime is designed to help the farmer determine the appropriate biomass that will not exceed the sites carrying capacity and harm the environment," she said.

"This is trying to impose a 'one size fits all' approach, which would eliminate the existing robust analysis that is currently part of the regulatory framework."

Sign up for our Salmon Newsletter
Keep on top of the fast-moving salmon sector with our free newsletter.

In Norway, the Aquaculture Act regulates salmon farming, and there are certifications from organizations such as the Aquaculture Stewardship Council and the Marine Stewardship Council, but no specific regulations for additives are mentioned.

The RSPCA has welfare standards for farmed Atlantic salmon, and A Greener World certifies salmon farms, but no specific information is available on additives.

The use of additives in salmon farming is a complex issue, with both positive and negative impacts on human health and the environment, and requires careful regulation and monitoring.

The global salmon market is projected to grow, but the industry must balance its growth with the need to protect the environment and ensure the health and safety of consumers.

The regulatory frameworks for salmon farming additives in Norway, Canada, and Chile are not fully compared, but some information is available on the environmental and health impacts of salmon farming in these countries.

Norway is the world's largest exporter of salmon, and its aquaculture industry is subject to regulations and standards that may differ from those in other countries.

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

The Ministry of Fisheries monitors fishing products for safety, including the additives used in salmon farming, to ensure compliance with regulations.

Title:

Content: ANNOUNCEMENTS
Marine fishing: monitoring field outputs to ensure the safety of products
The Ministry of Fisheries, through the mixed teams consisting of veterinarians and inspectors from the Ministry and the sectors of trade and promotion of exports and agriculture, is keen to intensify the control field outputs.
To check the safety of fishing products and ensure their conformity with health conditions, especially in light of high temperatures.
Huntur Abderrahman, director of the monitoring of fishing activities, aquaculture and control of the market of products at the Ministry of Fisheries, said in a statement “Loag ”.
The control of fishery products is carried out periodically by veterinarians and inspectors in order to ensure the safety of the products before they are marketed to the consumer.
Hentur also pointed out that the sector is working to strengthen the number of veterinarians to intensify their presence at the local level.
to ensure greater transparency and control ” of fishing products.
He pointed out that the fishing products are monitored as soon as they arrive at the port by veterinarians from the concerned sectors and the State Veterinary Inspectorate to ensure their quality.
Monitoring is also carried out at the level of dams and water bodies.
He explained that the conditions of storage, cooling and packaging of marine products are checked until they reach the marketing or conversion units.
He added that after confirming the quality of the products, a health certificate is issued by the veterinarian that allows the transfer of fishing products from the port to the points of sale or transfer units.
Huntur also pointed out that the distribution network of fishing products has been strengthened by the acquisition of several refrigerated trucks.
to ensure the safety of the product.
He also stressed that the logistics network is good and characterized by all the necessary conditions, which ensures the arrival of fishing products from the ports to the maximum points in the south in good sanitary conditions.
He pointed out that the fishery products exported to European countries fully comply with the strict standards and conditions in force.
This translates into the quality, quality and health of local fishery products.
Permanent Link: https: / / nhar.tv / yOwxg
ANNOUNCEMENTS
ANNOUNCEMENTS

The FDA monitors seafood imports, including salmon, for banned antibiotics and additives, and refuses contaminated products.

Title:

Content: FDA Adds Nekkanti Sea Foods to Import Alert on Nitrofurans; Refuses Shrimp Contaminated with Banned Antibiotics from Five Different Countries in April

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published detailed data regarding 107 total seafood entry line refusals in April, of which eight (7.5%) were of shrimp for reasons related to banned antibiotics.

Over the first four months of this year, the FDA has refused a total of 31 entry lines of shrimp for reasons related to banned antibiotics, putting the agency on pace for a total of 93 shrimp entry line refusals for veterinary drug residues in 2022, which would be the most for a year since 2016.

The eight shrimp entry lines refused in April were for shipments from five different companies in Bangladesh, China, Hong Kong, India, and Malaysia:

·     Gemini Sea Food, Ltd. (Bangladesh), a company that is currently listed on Import Alert 16-129 (“Detention Without Physical Examination of Seafood Products Due to Nitrofurans”) as of November 15, 2021, had two entry lines refused for shrimp contaminated with nitrofurans and veterinary drug residues by the Division of Northeast Imports on April 14, 2022 and one entry line refused for shrimp contaminated with nitrofurans and veterinary drug residues by the Division of Northeast Imports on April 19, 2022;

·     Mr. Fang’s Store (Putian) Green Food Co., Ltd. (China), a company that is not on the green list of Import Alert 16-131 (“Detention Without Physical Examination of Aquacultured, Shrimp, Dace, and Eel from China – Presence of New Animal Drugs and/or Unsafe Food Additives”), had one entry line refused for shrimp contaminated with veterinary drug residues and unsafe additives by the Division of West Coast Imports on April 5, 2021;

·     Wing Cheong Marine Product (Hong Kong), a company that is not currently listed on Import Alert 16-124 (“Detention Without Physical Examination of Aquaculture Seafood Products Due to Unapproved Drugs”), Import Alert 16-127 (“Detention Without Physical Examination of Crustaceans Due to Chloramphenicol”), or Import Alert 16-129 (“Detention Without Physical Examination of Seafood Products Due to Nitrofurans”), had one entry line refused for shrimp contaminated with veterinary drug residues and unsafe additives by the Division of West Coast Imports on April 28, 2022;

·     Nekkanti Sea Foods Limited (India), a company that is currently listed on Import Alert 16-129 (“Detention Without Physical Examination of Seafood Products Due to Nitrofurans”) as of May 3, 2022, had one entry line refused for shrimp contaminated with veterinary drug residues by the Division of Northeast Imports on April 21, 2022; and

·     EB Frozen Food Sdn. Bhd. (Malaysia), a company located in peninsular Malaysia that is not on the green list of Import Alert 16-136 (“Detention Without Physical Examination of Aquacultured Shrimp and Prawns from Peninsular Malaysia Due to Presence of Drug Residues from Unapproved Animal Drugs or the Presence of Unsafe Food Additives”), had two entry line refused for shrimp contaminated with veterinary drug residues and unsafe additives by the Division of West Coast Imports on April 14, 2022.

In addition to these shipments, the FDA also refused another twelve entry lines of shrimp for the presence of salmonella and another four entry lines of shrimp for being filthy.

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning antibiotics in farmes salmon?

The FSSAI conducts surveillance on food items, including salmon, to ensure compliance with regulations, and non-compliance leads to penalties.

Title:

Content:     The Economic Times daily newspaper is available online now.

    FSSAI to launch quality check of food items like dairy products, spices, fortified rice

    Synopsis

    The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) plans to conduct surveillance on various food items like fortified rice, dairy products, and spices sold in the domestic market. This comes after a probe into alleged violation of norms in branded spices. FSSAI is already taking samples of spices from all brands to check compliance with its norms. The number of samples analyzed by FSSAI has substantially increased over the years, showing efforts to enforce food safety regulations. Non-compliance can lead to penalties under the FSS Act, including fines and imprisonment.

    New Delhi | Pune: The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has ordered a nationwide testing of the spices of all brands. This after Singapore and Hong Kong suspended the sale of some spice blends of two top-selling brands - MDH and Everest - citing high levels of ethylene oxide (ETO), a pesticide which is unfit for human consumption and a cancer risk with long exposure.

    The regulator has ordered its officials to conduct extensive inspections, sampling and testing at all spice manufacturing units, with a focus on those making curry powders and mixed spice blends. It has also ordered state governments to test spices and ensure quality. Apart from spices, FSSAI also plans to launch surveillance on other food items such as fortified rice and dairy products.

    Spices Board Decision
    Separately, India's Spices Board has made testing for ETO mandatory for all spices being exported to Hong Kong and Singapore. Testing has been made mandatory from May 6. "All the spice consignments, including ready-to-eat (RTE) products, destined for Singapore and Hong Kong shall be accompanied with a cleared analytical report for ETO issued by Spices Board," the board said.

    Even though Indian authorities have set standards for 30 spices and condiments, export destinations such as Hong Kong, Singapore and the US have their own standards, which experts said are stricter than those in India.

    Hong Kong last month suspended sales of three spice blends made by MDH and an Everest spice mix for fish curry. Singapore ordered a recall of the same Everest mix. The US customs authority has also rejected several shipments of MDH citing contamination with salmonella in the last six months.

    After the issue came to light, MDH said that it does not use ETO at any stage of storing, processing, or packing its spices. Everest said that all its products undergo stringent quality control checks. It said the reports of the brand being banned in Singapore and Hong Kong was false and that the orders were only to recall the products and temporarily hold them for further inspection.

    Even as FSSAI expands its crackdown on spice brands that do not meet quality standards, other manufacturers said that they adhere to all necessary regulations and follow stringent testing protocols.

    "All our spices comply with the regulations set up by FSSAI for Indian markets and by the Spices Board of India for the overseas markets. All export consignments are tested by the Spices Board and shipped only once they comply with their regulations and specifications," Mohit Malhotra, CEO of Dabur.

    (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)
    ( Originally published on May 02, 2024 )
    (Catch all the Business News, Breaking News Budget 2024 News, Budget 2024 Live Coverage, Events and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)

    Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily Market Updates & Live Business News.

    ...more

    Stories you might be interested in

The EU monitors antitrust rules in salmon farming, and companies may face fines for non-compliance.

Title:

Content: SALM

EU says Norwegian salmon producers might have distorted competition

Credit: REUTERS/SERGEI KARPUKHIN

Adds company responses and share price reaction

Jan 25 (Reuters) - The European Commission has informed six Norwegian salmon producers of its suspicion that they breached EU antitrust rules by distorting competition for spot sales of Norwegian farmed Atlantic salmon in the EU, it said on Thursday.

The Commission said it was concerned that Cermaq, Grieg Seafood GSFG.OL, Bremnes, Leroy LSG.OL, Mowi MOWI.OL and SalMar SALM.OL had exchanged commercially sensitive information about prices and volumes between 2011 and 2019 to reduce market uncertainty.

Mowi, SalMar, Leroy and Grieg Seafood issued statements contesting the Commission's preliminary findings, maintaining their commitment to competition laws and expressing their intention to cooperate with the investigation.

Cermaq said it explicitly disagreed with the Commission's preliminary findings but will refrain from further comment until watchdog's final decision.

A Bremnes representative was not immediately available for comment.

Shares in Mowi, SalMar, Leroy and Grieg Seafood fell 4.9%, 1.9%, 5.7% and 7.1% respectively after the Commission announcement.

Antitrust regulators raided salmon farms in several European Union countries in February 2019, including some owned by Mowi, on suspicions of involvement in a cartel.

The Commission did not name the companies at the time. But Mowi, the world's biggest producer of farmed Atlantic salmon, said that EU regulators had raided two of its businesses, in Scotland and the Netherlands.

Norway accounts for more than half of the farmed Atlantic salmon worldwide and the EU is its main importer.

The alleged conduct concerns sales of fresh, whole and gutted Atlantic salmon farmed in Norway. It does not concern frozen farmed Atlantic salmon or processed products such as salmon fillets, loins or smoked salmon, the commission said.

The statement of objections sent to the companies does not prejudge the outcome of an investigation, it added.

(Reporting by Bart Meijer additional reporting by Jesus Calero Editing by David Goodman )

((Bart.Meijer@thomsonreuters.com;))

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

Tags

More Related Articles

This data feed is not available at this time.

Sign up for Smart Investing to get the latest news, strategies and tips to help you invest smarter.

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning additives in salmon feed?

What countries or jurisdictions have regulations concerning antibiotics in farmes salmon?

The Codex Alimentarius sets international food standards, including those for additives used in salmon farming, which are adopted by countries such as Zambia.

Title:

Content: Sylvia Masebo calls for safer food handling to prevent illnesses, fatalities and costs on the health care system

0
1 views

Minister of Health Sylvia Masebo has called for safer food handling in order to prevent illnesses, fatalities and reduce costs on the health care system.

When launching the Fifth World Food Safety Day on television, Ms. Masebo said food safety is essential in protecting individuals from bacteria, parasites and contaminants.

The United Nations General Assembly in 2018 December adopted and designated 7th June every year as World Food Safety day in order to strengthen food safety measures globally.

Ms. Masebo said food safety standards ensure protection of the lives of everyone as they establish the criteria which food should meet to protect consumers and establish confidence in the product.

“Food safety is essential in protecting individuals from bacteria, parasites, contaminants such as heavy metals and residues of pesticides and veterinary drugs that can be passed through food consumption. By practicing safe food handling, these food hazards can prevent illnesses and fatalities and reduce costs on the health care system. Food safety is an essential part of food security and it is only safe food that can meet nutritional needs and help adults to live an active and healthy life and children to grow and develop. Therefore, Food safety has a direct impact on health as Safe food allows for the uptake of nutrients, promotes long-term human development and achievement of several of the Sustainable Development Goals,” Ms. Masebo said.

“Although Zambia has had challenges to quantify the burden of foodborne illnesses, studies indicate that most diarrheal cases are strongly associated with food contamination and food poisoning. In 2018, 933 cases with four (4) deaths were recoded because of food poisoning and it is hence imperative that the government enforces safe food standards from the farm to the table.Food safety standards ensure protection of the lives of everyone as they establish the criteria which food should meet to protect consumers and establish confidence in the product. The Codex Alimentarius Commission, to which Zambia is a member since 1971, has been setting international food standards for 60 years. The Codex Alimentarius has 236 standards, 84 guidelines, 56 codes of practice, 126 maximum levels for contaminants in food, and over 10 000 quantitative standards covering maximum levels for food additives and maximum residue limits for pesticides and veterinary drugs in food. Adoption of these standards and guidelines into national legislation ensures reduction of food hazards and protection of the consumers from ill health associated with consumption of unsafe food,” she said.

Ms. Masebo said health risks associated with veterinary drug residues have been a source of concern due to antimicrobial resistance in humans.

Ms. Masebo continued:” It is therefore the duty of the Government to help protect the livelihoods of food traders by establishing a robust food control system and rigorous export and import controls. Food standards also protect consumers by making sure that the food they consume is safer and contributes to consumer confidence in the products.The Government under the leadership of His Excellency, Mr. Hakainde Hichilema, President of Republic of Zambia has put up robust measures to improve food safety.Following the enactment of the Food Safety Act No.7 of 2019, the Ministry has commenced development of science driven Food Safety regulations and reviewing the Food and Drugs Regulations, which are anchored on the repealed Food and Drugs Act Chapter 303. The Ministry is also in its final stage of appointing the members of the Food Safety Coordinating Committee in order to strengthen stakeholder coordination in the food value chain.”

Ms. Masebo added that the fifth World Food Safety Day is meant to draw attention and inspire action to help prevent, detect and manage foodborne risks.

“The Ministry in collaboration with the Ministry of Commerce Trade and Industry and with support from the European Union Development Fund Round 11 has developed and finalized the Food Safety inspection manual for Border Posts and currently commenced development of the Food Safety sampling plans, which are currently in their draft phase awaiting finalization. Further, more Environmental Health Staff were recruited during the recruitment of 11,000 Health workers to facilitate Legal Enforcement and compliance to food standards.The fifth World Food Safety Day is meant to draw attention and inspire action to help prevent, detect and manage foodborne risks, contributing to food security, human health, economic prosperity, agricultural production, market access, tourism and sustainable development. As the country moves to sustainable agriculture and increased food security, allow me to emphasise that Food security is achieved when all citizens have physical and economical access to food that meets their dietary needs for an active and healthy life. If it is not safe, it is not Food and there is no Food Security without Food Safety,” she said

“As I conclude, allow me to make the following Call to action. Policy makers 1 Make safe food an easy choice by shaping public support Programmes, such as food aid, school feeding and other publicly owned food outlets.2. Focus on establishing robust national food safety system and ensure it complies with food safety standards.Encourage and engage in multisectoral collaboration at the local, national, regional and global levels.Food businesses.Engage employees, suppliers and other stakeholders to grow and develop a food safety culture. Comply with national and international food standards.Educational institutions and workplaces.Promote safe food handling.Engage with families and involve them in food safety activities for Support food safety education.Consumers Practice safe food handling at home and follow WHO’s Five Keys to Safer Food keep clean separate raw and cooked foods. cook thoroughly keep food at safe temperatures, and use safe water and raw materials,” Ms. Masebo concluded.

The consequences of non-compliance with regulations and standards for additives in salmon farming include severe fines, reputational damage, and permit revocation, as well as potential health risks to consumers.

Title:

Content: Regulatory Compliance And Enforcement – What You Need To Know And How We Can Help

SS
Stephen Scown

Contributor

Stephen Scown
Over the past year, UK regulators have intensified inspections and prosecutions for significant legislative breaches, resulting in severe fines, reputational damage, and potential custodial sentences. This article explores non-compliance consequences and showcases successful client defense strategies.
UK Environment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Over the last 12 months there has been a noticeable increase in activity levels by the main UK regulators; conducting inspections, investigations and prosecutions where significant breaches of legislation have taken place resulting in actual harm or a risk of harm.

In this article, we look at the consequences of non-compliance and some examples of why things go wrong and explain how we have been able to help our rural clients.

What is the cost of getting it wrong?

In the event of a successful prosecution brought by the Health and Safety Executive, Environment Agency, Food Standards Agency and Local Authority Environmental Health Departments, the Courts have unlimited sentencing powers in terms of the fines that can be imposed. There are other consequences that are less straightforward to quantify in financial terms, such as reputational damage, the impact of director disqualification and having a criminal conviction.

Fines are worked out by taking account of an organisation's culpability, the level of harm caused or harm risked, and their financial status. As an example, an organisation with an annual turnover of less than £2 million whose culpability in the context of a work-related accident was found to be "high" involving a high likelihood of a significant harm, would be exposed to a potential fine of over £100,000 excluding costs. Individuals convicted of a health and safety offence can receive a custodial sentence of up to 2 years.

Similar sanctions can be, and often are, imposed for environmental offences. Recent examples include;

  • a 12 month custodial sentence and £600,000 prosecution costs order imposed on a Herefordshire farmer for undertaking non-permitted dredging and re-profiling of a 1.5km stretch of a river in a site of special scientific interest (SSSI), and
  • custodial sentences of up to 30 months handed to individuals involved in a large -scale illegal waste operation at a Staffordshire farm.

Why things have gone wrong and how we have been able to help

Health and Safety

What happened?

A member of the public claimed to have been injured after coming into contact with cows with calves at foot at the client's farm. Warning signs had been put up but these were regularly vandalised or removed.

An investigation was undertaken by HSE and an Improvement Notice was served. Acting on our advice, the Improvement Notice was appealed.

How did we help?

We successfully argued that there were no reasonably practicable alternatives to placing cows with calves in the field in question or offering other routes for rights of way users routes to follow. To minimise the risk of a future incident, the client agreed to monitor and replace warning signs more frequently and also committed to only letting cows with calves graze in the field that had established good temperaments.

We were able to persuade HSE to withdraw the Improvement Notice for technical reasons and, as a result of the prompt and effective remedial action taken by the client, also to agree not to serve a further Improvement Notice or take formal enforcement action in the form of a prosecution.

Environmental

What happened?

The following is not an uncommon story.

A farming client was approached by an individual who claimed to be the owner of a permitted waste transfer station and recycling operation nearby. The client was offered the opportunity of being provided with significant volumes of what was described as clean hardcore/construction waste to make good his farm tracks and also to receive a modest payment for each load.

No enquiries were undertaken by the client to make sure that the individual was a legitimate waste operator, there was an environmental permit in place for their site and also an exemption registered for the intended activities. The client also failed to check, or ask for documentation, to confirm the material's waste type and, importantly that it was clean and therefore free from hazardous substances.

How did we help?

Shortly afterwards, the Environment Agency became aware of what had happened and established that the imported waste was heavily contaminated with asbestos containing materials. We then became involved.

The Agency initially suspected the client of deliberately accepting contaminated hardcore in return for payment. However, through written caution representations, the background and circumstances were explained to the Agency, who quickly accepted that the client should no longer be treated as a suspect.

The client subsequently provided a witness statement to the Environment Agency for use as evidence against the prosecution brought against the illegal waste operator.

The client was fortunate as he was able to recover the costs of removing the waste to a properly permitted site as part of the victim compensation order made by the sentencing judge. We raised the making of an application for a victim compensation order with the Agency at an early stage and collated the necessary evidence required for the Agency's application to succeed.

Food Safety/Food Hygiene

What happened?

We were approached by the owner of a farm and farm shop who was being prosecuted by the Foods Standards Agency. The client was alleged to have committed multiple food safety offences associated with the sale of a dairy product.

The prosecution's case was that the client's offending was deliberate, occurred over a substantial period of time and had caused a serious health risk.

How did we help?

We went on the record for the client and, following analysis of the evidence, we challenged the basis of the Food Standards Agency's case.

As a result of undertaking focused lines of enquiry and gathering further evidence, we were able to persuade the Food Standards Agency to accept that the quality of only one small batch of the dairy product had been compromised and that the reason was due to a sudden, isolated and unknown, malfunction with the client's processing equipment.

Had the case originally advanced by the prosecution not been challenged, the sentencing guideline that would have applied (to the client) included the ability for the court to impose a custodial sentence of up to two years. Instead, a very modest fine was imposed.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More

Title:

Content: Health · Life
Do the "four strictest" to protect food safety (people's health in the ten years)
Our reporter Wang Meihua
July 19, 2022 05: 38 Source: People 's Daily Overseas Edition
On June 29, in Lianyungang, Jiangsu, inspectors were collecting vegetable samples to detect the presence of pesticide residues.
Photo by Zhu Huanan (People 's Vision)
The picture shows that on June 20, the staff of the market supervision and management department of Huaibei City, Anhui Province, inspected the implementation of basic information such as the identity and health status of the food delivery staff, registration, updating and filing at the rider management site of the takeaway enterprise.
Photo by Li Xin (People 's Vision)
People eat for the day, food for peace first.
Food safety is related to everyone's health and life safety, and it must be grasped and tightened.
Since the 18th Party Congress, China's food safety work has made positive progress, and truly achieved "the most rigorous standards, the most stringent supervision, the most severe punishment, the most serious accountability, to ensure the safety of the broad masses of the people" on the tip of the tongue ".
1419 national food safety standards have been issued
Food safety is no small matter, to create the most rigorous food safety standard system, "eat at ease" problem can have a chapter to follow.
Food safety standards are mandatory technical regulations, which are not only the basic compliance of producers and operators, but also an important basis for supervision and law enforcement.
In the past 10 years, the National Health and Health Commission has set up a national standard review committee with nearly 400 experts from 17 departments, adhering to the scientific basis of rigorous risk assessment, and establishing a standard development system with open and transparent procedures, extensive participation of experts in various fields, and evaluation of scientific authority.
Up to now, 1,419 national food safety standards have been issued, including more than 20,000 indicators, covering the main health hazards from farmland to table, from production and processing to the whole chain of products, and all links, to ensure the safety of the diet of the whole population.
The framework of the standard system is not only in line with the dietary structure of Chinese residents, but also in line with international practices.
"The food safety standards and monitoring and evaluation department of the State Health and Health Commission," Liu Jinfeng, director of the food safety standards and monitoring and evaluation department of the State Health and Health Commission, said that the State Health and Health Commission has integrated the enforcement content of food safety standards, food hygiene, specification quality and industry standards, focusing on solving the problem of "a large number of standards, not knowing which to use".
In recent years, in accordance with the requirements of the "most rigorous standards", the National Health Commission has improved the standard development system based on risk monitoring and evaluation.
At present, China's food safety standards system is divided into four categories: general standards, product standards, production and operation norms and inspection methods, covering the entire process from raw materials to the table.
The four categories of standards are linked to each other to control food safety risks from different angles.
Liu Jinfeng said that China has been the chair of the International Codex Committee on Food Additives and Pesticide Residues for 15 consecutive years, taking the lead in coordinating the food standards work of the Asian Codex Committee, and playing a positive role in the development and exchange of international and regional food safety standards.
Monitoring of food contamination and harmful factors in 99% of counties
Let the people eat at ease, food safety risk monitoring and evaluation is the "gatekeeper".
According to Li Ning, director of the National Food Safety Risk Assessment Center, after more than ten years of organizing and implementing the national food safety risk monitoring and evaluation, it has initially grasped the status and trend of major food contamination in China, and basically grasped the trend and pathogenesis of major foodborne diseases in different regions and seasons.
"For example, poisonous mushroom poisoning occurs mainly in some areas in the south.
In recent years, local governments have strengthened risk warnings in areas with high incidence of poisoning, and increased targeted popularizing propaganda such as consumers not taking or eating wild mushrooms, which has significantly reduced the number of cases and deaths of toxic mushroom poisoning.
At present, China has established two major monitoring networks at the national, provincial, municipal and county levels for monitoring food pollution and harmful factors, and for monitoring foodborne diseases, as well as a national food safety risk assessment system.
The monitoring of food pollution and harmful factors has covered 99% of counties and districts, and the monitoring of foodborne diseases has covered more than 70,000 medical institutions at all levels.
Food Contaminants and Harmful Factors Monitoring Food categories cover all 32 categories of food such as cereals and oils, fruits and vegetables, eggs and milk, meat and poultry, and aquatic products that are consumed daily by residents.
"These measures make important food safety hazards more sensitive to identification and early warning, not only for the development of standards to provide a scientific basis, but also for the orderly development of industry norms and protection of public health to provide strong support." Liu Jinfeng said.
In recent years, the take-away delivery business has developed rapidly, the network catering service has gradually increased, and its food safety problems have been widely concerned.
"From the point of view of food safety, whether it is takeout or food, online shopping or physical store purchase, the safety requirements for food are the same," Liu said.
Takeaway and online food manufacturers and operators should strictly abide by relevant laws and regulations and standards, strengthen the management of production, storage, transportation and distribution, and jointly maintain the "tongue safety" of consumers.
Strict Approval Management System for Food Additives
Food additives can improve the quality and color, smell and taste of food, and play an important role in preventing food spoilage.
But many people have doubts about food additives - can you eat them?
"The development of the food industry is inseparable from food additives, such as colorants used to improve food color, preservatives used to prevent food corruption, and coagulants used in brine point tofu, which are food additives."
It is the existence of food additives that makes the production, storage, transportation and circulation of food normal, and all kinds of food in supermarkets can be so colorful. Li Ning said that China has adopted a strict approval management system for the use of food additives, and only food additives that are technically necessary and safe and reliable will be approved for use.
Even if the safety is guaranteed, the process is not necessary and the use will not be approved.
China has strict regulations on what kinds of food additives can be used in and how much is used; there are also strict requirements for the management, labeling, and production licensing of food additives.
As long as the food additives that meet the requirements of the standard are used in accordance with the scope and amount of use of the standard, they are safe.
Some consumers are worried that the daily intake of multiple foods contains the same food additive, whether it will exceed the standard and bring extra burden to the body.
In this regard, Li Ning said that when the National Health and Health Commission formulated the scope of use and dosage of each food additive in food, it has fully considered the situation that consumers may consume a variety of foods containing the same additive in a day.
"As long as the production enterprises strictly follow the standards of food additives to use, food is qualified, consumers do not need to worry about additives on the health of additional burden." Li Ning said, suggesting that consumers in the dietary pattern of reasonable matching, balanced meals, in accordance with the Chinese dietary guidelines recommended dietary patterns, eat healthier and more nutritious.
(Editor: Yang Guangyu, Hu Yongqiu)
Related News

Title:

Content: Embattled Chilean salmon producer Nova Austral will have to pay fines totaling $947,654 (€874,275) for damaging the seabed at one of its production sites following an appeals court ruling this week, Chile's environmental authority, the Superintendencia del Medio Ambiente (SMA) said.

The fine was originally handed down in July 2022 after SMA alleged the seabed had been altered at the Aracena 14 production site in the Magallanes region of southern Chile.

That same month the company had permits revoked at other production sites after repeated instances of overproduction were found to have caused environmental damage in the Alberto de Agostini National Park, Magallanes Region.

The measures in place to monitor and enforce compliance with regulations and standards for additives in salmon farming include regular inspections, sampling, and testing, as well as public reporting and transparency.

Title:

Content: Skip to Content

Drug-resistant sea lice an increasing problem for B.C. fish farms, new study finds

By Melanie Nagy

Click here for updates on this story

    May 14, 2022 (CTV Network) — Every spring, endangered juvenile wild salmon migrate from B.C.’s rivers to the Pacific Ocean, but their numbers are dwindling and some fear sea lice parasites are increasingly to blame. Sea lice are tiny, oval shaped crustaceans that can cling to the backs of wild salmon, feeding on their skin, muscle tissue and blood. Adult fish are generally not harmed when a few lice attach themselves, but juveniles with underdeveloped scales can be harmed or killed when heavily infested. While the parasite occurs naturally in the waters off B.C.’s coast, there’s long been concern over outbreaks on aquaculture farms where open-net pens make it possible for lice to move from farmed fish to young migrating salmon. “Salmon farms act as this year-round reservoir for sea lice, potentially providing sea lice to wild juvenile salmon when they wouldn’t normally get them,” conservation biologist Sean Godwin said. Godwin is the lead author in a recent study that looked at the state of sea lice in the Pacific Ocean. Along with his fellow researchers, he found the parasite is increasingly becoming resistant to one of the main tools the industry relies on to combat the problem. “Our paper found that this tool, which is a pesticide known [as] SLICE, or emamectin benzoate, is becoming less effective and that sea lice are developing resistance to it on farms here,” Godwin said. To assess parasite resistance, “bioassay, treatment and salmon-louse count data from 2010 to 2021” were analyzed. During that time, the researchers found a notable decrease in the effectiveness of SLICE. “It is going to be more difficult for salmon farms to control sea lice outbreaks on their farms,” said Godwin. In the province’s stunning Clayoquot Sound, Bonny Glambeck routinely uses a fine-mesh net and a sample cup to test the waters near fish farms. Glambeck heads the Tofino-based conservation society known as Clayoquot Action and every year she monitors industry lice counts and tracks wild salmon infestations. “The control of sea lice on fish farms is something I do not believe the industry has ever been able to crack,” she said. “Parasites like these sea lice proliferate on these farms and then they can pass them on to wild salmon. With that, we feel that every year that goes by and these farms are allowed to pollute the waters with these infestations, they are just wiping out another generation of wild salmon.” Fisheries and Oceans Canada requires all fish farms in Canadian coastal waters to have a sea lice management plan. The federal department also places a limit of three lice per salmon during the spring when young salmon are out-migrating and are most vulnerable. In addition to that, the industry publicly reports lice counts on individual company websites every month. “The worry is that those lice levels might accumulate and then be released back to affect wild migratory salmon. The science doesn’t support that, but the concern exists so the industry responds to that,” said Brian Kingzett. Kingzett is the science and policy director with the BC Salmon Farmers Association. He says the industry has warned the federal government for years about the waning efficacy of SLICE, and has long called on Ottawa to approve new pesticide options. “There are other anti-parasite agents that have been approved in other areas of the world and we would certainly like to add that to our toolbox.” While SLICE is the only approved pesticide in Canada, it is not the only option for a fish farm struggling with a lice infestation. Kingzett says other environmentally friendly methods include the use of specialized delousing boats. One readily used vessel can suck fish from ocean-based pens into tanks where pressurized water is used to forcibly remove any attached lice. According to the industry, any dislodged bugs are collected by filters for disposal so they are not reintroduced to the marine environment. “During the last five years, the industry has spent about $100 million on importing new technologies,” Kingzett said. “Fish farming is an important industry in B.C. because we are facing a global seafood shortage and the farming sector is looking to provide sustainable, high-quality product.” The industry, however, is controversial and there’s been an ongoing battle to have all fish farms in the province removed. Earlier this month, there was a large protest in Tofino involving Indigenous leaders, conservationists and environmentalists. The group took to the waters near a local fish farm to voice their opposition to the industry and call on Ottawa to evict them. “It is a do-or-die moment for the salmon farming industry,” said Alexandra Morton, who is an independent biologist and longtime wild salmon activist. “We need to do whatever we can to save wild salmon populations because they are sadly on the verge of extinction.” In response, those in support of fish farms argue they are not a direct threat to wild salmon and are a vital industry. According to the BC Salmon Farmers Association, there are nearly 5,000 jobs linked to fish farms and at least $1 billion “in economic activity” is generated annually. Despite that, Ottawa has previously announced that it’s committed to phasing out open-net salmon farms in B.C. by 2025. In addition, it’s uncertain if 79 federal fish farm licenses expiring in June will be renewed.

Please note: This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.

Matthew Talbot
matthew.talbot@bellmedia.ca

CNN Newsource

Skip to content

The Scottish salmon sector is a significant contributor to the Scottish economy, delivering £760 million and supporting 10,000 workers, but faces challenges such as low unemployment and limited labor availability.

Title:

Content: Scottish salmon is an economic powerhouse that can help UK get through tough times but post-Brexit trade problems must be addressed – Tavish Scott

As millions of people enjoy eating Scottish salmon over the festive period, it’s worth remembering the incredible hard work that goes into this extraordinary global success story.

While you read this, probably at home with your family, hard-working farmers are out there looking after their fish. Our success is a 24/7/365 business, requiring an immense effort from the hundreds of people working in Scotland’s remotest communities – often in the harshest conditions – including the skippers and marine operatives, the country’s most-qualified vets, the fish husbandry experts who help to hatch and rear salmon that can thrive in the cold fresh waters off the west coast, and the 10,000 workers in hundreds of supply chain companies that help get salmon from egg to plate.

It also involves the efforts of government ministers in Edinburgh and London, our international partners, and the tens of thousands of restaurateurs, fishmongers and chefs who serve up one of the most nutritious foods we can eat. Working together, we are collectively part of a global success story which now delivers an extraordinary £760 million for the Scottish economy.

Hide Ad

That includes a direct economic contribution of £303 million in gross value added (GVA), up nearly a fifth on pre-pandemic levels, with the supply chain further supporting jobs in every part of Scotland, and employment costs benefitting local communities and companies all year round. All this has been achieved by a dedicated workforce despite the incredible challenges of Covid and Brexit. By tapping into salmon farming’s full potential, I’m confident the ‘blue economy’ can deliver even greater benefits for local communities – and could be worth £1 billion to the Scottish economy in just a few years.

Hide Ad

Demand for our product remains strong at home and abroad. Scottish salmon exports recovered to near-record figures in 2021, increasing to £614 million. Scottish salmon remains the UK’s biggest food export, followed by bread and pastries, chocolate, cereals, and cheese. We don’t expect to repeat last year’s record-breaking performance in 2022, but the sector remains very strong and international demand remains high – particularly in France, where Scottish salmon is recognised by chefs, restaurants and consumers as the best in the world.

Meanwhile, sales of all salmon in UK shops are running at £1.2 billion a year, making up nearly 30 per cent of total fish sales – an increasing proportion and cementing salmon’s place as the UK’s most popular fish. A high level of domestic seafood consumption is not only healthy for the population, but it will also help the economy in some of the most rural areas of Scotland combat the challenges being faced by many at this time.

Hide Ad

Scottish salmon is also widely accepted in our farming regions with a clear majority supporting salmon farming in their local communities. An opinion poll published this year confirmed that the majority of Scots who live near salmon farms support what we do. Residents said that farms provide jobs for local people, help to improve the local economy, and provide a high-quality product that Scotland can be proud of. And 2022 also marked the 30th anniversary of Scottish salmon being awarded the Label Rouge accolade.

Our popularity further extends to the planet’s best chefs, which is why Salmon Scotland was recently accepted into the prestigious Worldchef group in recognition of the extraordinary quality of our high-protein fish and we look forward to engaging with top chefs at home and abroad over the next 12 months.

Hide Ad

The coming year will not be without its economic challenges. So it’s imperative that governments tap into the full potential of the Scottish salmon sector.

For the Scottish Government, that means a more streamlined regulatory framework that is more transparent and efficient, removing unnecessary planning delays and the bureaucracy generated by too many quangos. We are fortunate to have strong support from Scottish ministers – but that doesn’t always translate to the way that government in Edinburgh operates.

Hide Ad

We have put forward a sensible proposal to redirect millions of pounds which currently head to Crown Estate Scotland coffers and invest that money in housing in the communities where we farm, providing affordable housing for local workers.

Delivering regulatory reform is what will enable Scotland to compete with our international rivals, as well as enable the Scottish Government’s ambition for the sector between now and 2050. We would also welcome an approach from policymakers and regulators based on evidence, science and facts – not perception and pandering to campaign groups which attack the sector.

Hide Ad

As for the UK Government, following an unprecedented period of political turmoil, we need ministers to address the post-Brexit challenges our sector faces. There is low unemployment and extremely limited labour availability in areas where our businesses operate.

A more enlightened approach to immigration is vital to assist business, and we want to make progress on digital export health certificates in 2023. Next summer, it is also imperative that we do not see a repeat of the cross-channel delays which affected us and so many other businesses.

Hide Ad

The Brexit vote is in the past, but trade is about the future. So we need the UK Government to put its shoulder to the wheel and supercharge our trading relationships with our most important markets.

With a long recession ahead of us, few sectors are as well placed as ours to help the country through this – and then deliver our recovery and renewal. Given the ever-growing global population, the blue economy has to be the future. Salmon from Scotland is key to that. That is both the prize and the opportunity ahead of us.

Hide Ad

Tavish Scott is chief executive of Salmon Scotland

The Canadian salmon farming industry has shrunk by 40 per cent since 2020, due to factors such as climate change and regulatory decisions, and the closure of fish farms in the Discovery Islands region has reduced salmon supply by 40,000 tonnes.

Title:

Content: A now closed fish farm within B.C.’s Discovery Islands region. In February, the Federal Government shut down 15 fish farms within the area. It has sparked the Canadian Aquaculture Industry Alliance (CAIA) to start an ad campaign designed to “Stop Closing Salmon Farms in B.C.” - Photo courtesy Sheri Beaulieu/Canadian Aquaculture Industry Alliance

‘Stop closing fish farms in B.C.’; open letter shows aquaculture industry not backing down

CAIA president Tim Kennedy talks new strategies as Aquaculture Canada summit opens in Victoria

According to Canadian Aquaculture Industry Alliance (CAIA) president Tim Kennedy, the recent hits the aquaculture industry has taken, including the closure of 15 fish farms in the Discovery Islands, is nothing new.

“I think where we are, 40 years is a very very short time for a whole new way of producing food,” said Kennedy from his office in Toronto. “The sector has been under attack, and I think unfairly for many years. We were very, very new. It is such a crazy, polarizing situation, but there is an absolute clear solution where we can see innovation and technology deployment accelerated. The industry has been under siege for a long time.”

READ MORE: Fisheries Department confirms closure of 15 Discovery Islands salmon farms

Kennedy was in Victoria this week, meeting with industry professionals and scientists, as well as having spoken at the Aquaculture Canada conference, which went on from May 7 to 10. Kennedy felt it was a time to share ideals and get answers from some of the industry’s best and brightest minds.

“A lot of the individuals there will be non-industry based. They are academics and work with different universities,” Kennedy said before the event. “There’ll be some good discussion and good debate about some very technical issues our industry faces. It is kind of an exciting place to be in and I think that’s what we’re looking forward to.”

It is also the reason why the CAIA launched an ad campaign, dedicated to “Stop Closing B.C. Salmon Farms,” as well as an open letter imploring the federal government to support B.C. Salmon farmers and the industry, as farms have shrunk by 40 per cent since 2020. The joint letter, written by representatives of the CAIA, was signed by industry heads from several national food associations, including the Animal Nutrition Association of Canada , the Canadian Aquaculture Suppliers Association, and the Canadian Meat Council.

“Our campaign came about because we know that activists have been using these types of campaigns for the longest time,” said Kennedy. “Ultimately, we needed to have a stronger voice. We haven’t. We want to think positive and think there’s a really positive outcome for the future of B.C. Salmon farming.”

Kennedy has said that the federal government’s decision to close the farms is really affecting the public, with rising costs and the continued importing of goods.

“Political decisions like this are hurting people’s pocket books,” said Kennedy. “All of the data that we are seeing within the sector is saying that the closures within B.C., a very tight market within the globe for salmon production. Taking that 40,000 tonnes out of British Columbia, in North America where salmon is by far the most popular seafood. It has a major impact on supply availability and price. B.C. Salmon could go to Ontario, could go to Alberta or the United States. This is directly impacting people — none of this is based on science. It’s pure politics.”

The North American market, he insists, will directly shift toward importing salmon. Ultimately, however, Kennedy does agree that with all hands on board at the Aquaculture Canada summit, there can be a viable solution for activists, as well as the industry as it heads forward with murky waters ahead.

“There are real changes in wild salmon right now that are principally driven by climate change, habitat loss, pollution and others. There is a concern,” said Kennedy. “There is a deep attachment to wild salmon within British Columbia culture. There’s a lot of anger and frustration and polarization and we have to break through that. I think we have to break through that polarization and look for a reasonable path ahead.”

For more information regarding the ad campaign, visit http://www.lovesalmon.ca

Edward Hitchins
edward.hitchins@campbellrivermirror.com

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter

DFOFish FarmsSalmon farming

Be Among The First To Know

Sign up for a free account today, and receive top headlines in your inbox Monday to Saturday.

Sign Up with google Sign Up with facebook

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reset your password

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

A link has been emailed to you - check your inbox.

Don't have an account? Click here to sign up

The differences in regulatory frameworks between countries can have significant impacts on the industry, environment, and human health, and highlight the need for standardized regulations governing the use of additives in salmon farming.