Voice cloning learns from recordings and acoustic features via NLP to replicate voices.

OpenAI’s Voice Engine and Microsoft’s VALL‑E generate realistic speech from 3–15‑second samples.

VALL‑E 2 reaches human‑parity from seconds of audio but is unreleased due to abuse risks.

Deep learning models infer timbre, rhythm, and intonation to produce natural‑sounding TTS.

Models trained on English or classical Arabic may perform worse on other dialects.

NVIDIA’s RAD‑TTS and similar tools let users control tempo, pitch, and voice transformation.

Entertainment uses include AI dubbing and reviving performers; ElevenLabs cloned Judy Garland and works with heirs of Laurence Olivier and James Dean.

A high‑profile demo deepfaked France’s President Macron singing.

Accessibility gains include reading assistance, translation, and voices for nonverbal or speech‑impaired people.

Alexa mimicked a grandmother’s voice to read to a child after under a minute of audio.

AI voices support impaired speakers, exemplified by actor Val Kilmer’s synthetic voice.

Criminals use clones for ransom and impersonation scams, leveraging short audio to demand money.

Authorities warn clones can fuel scams and election deception, requiring vigilance and verification.

Consumer guidance urges identity checks and AI‑voice detection to tell synthetic from human speech.

Americans lost an estimated $2.6 billion to voice‑cloning fraud in 2022.

The FCC prohibits robocalls using AI‑generated voices under the TCPA without prior express written consent.

U.S. authorities have banned AI‑generated voice calls used for fraud.

Commentators warn unregulated cloning can exploit artists and undermine livelihoods in music and beyond.

The Scarlett Johansson case spotlights consent and likeness issues and difficulties with legal remedies.

Policy experts urge clear laws defining legal uses, mandating transparency, and enabling enforcement.

Ethical debates span permission, privacy, and misinformation alongside accessibility and education benefits.

Voice cloning learns from recordings and acoustic features via NLP to replicate voices.

Title:

Content: Opinions and Articles
What is deepfake technology and how does it work?
What is deepfake technology and what is its mechanism of action and the limits of its potential that can be used to fake videos, images and sounds?
# Alert your personal opinion as a specialist in the field in the last post:
Deepfake is a very dangerous artificial intelligence technique that is used in the manufacture and counterfeiting of videos, images and sounds, which can show people saying or doing things they never said or did in fact and can reach high accuracy in it with the large size of data used in the training of the quasms that the technology works on.
Let ’ s start with Voice Deepfake, also known as Voice Cloning, is an artificial intelligence technique designed to create quasmids capable of imitating the voice of a real person.
In order to do this, it must be trained on the recordings of the target person and after the completion of the training phase, the algorithm is able to produce a synthetic voice similar to the voice of the target person.
To do this, specialists use natural language processing techniques such as NLP, a machine learning technique that enables computers to interpret, process, and understand human language.
These techniques are used to identify the distinctive voice features of the voice of the target person and there are a large number of voice features that are analyzed, including the feature of pitch and low voice so that there are people characterized by high voice and others by low voice, and is also analyzed speed feature in the nature of the speech of the target person, and also of these features Cadence, which is the way the voice of the target.
Of course, to reach high accuracy, there must be huge data to train Khasmia many recordings of the target person and the easiest way to reach quick results to falsify the voice of a person is to use one of the existing Khasmia online open source and the transfer learning technology on it and train the algorithm on a simple recording can Khasmia trained high precision easily identify the voice features and imitate.
But the problem is that most of the existing algorithms yes are high precision but they have been trained on either recordings in English or classical Arabic and algorithms trained on ZD data for those who enter a section in Sudanese bicycles get what is known as data drifting and this leads me a sharp decline in the accuracy of the results of the algorithm so you will find the product section very clear that it is fake.
Good and solution?
In the case of trying to fake the voice of a person in a Sudanese dialect using the technology of transfer learning will not benefit and will not come satisfactory results so you must train Khasmia from scratch on data using too many clips for the target person and is a very cumbersome process so you find there is a Russian company that offers this service to produce clips in English to fake videos and voice me anyone but at a cost of $20,000 per minute English can cost you $100,000.
The conclusion of the personal opinion that the audio in the video is real, but the video may be an old video was installed audio and adjust the synchronization and movement of the lips using the Deepfake technology in the video I noticed in the movement of the lips of the speaker some errors in the synchronization between what is said and the movement of the lips.
with my regards,
M.M. Mohammed A.M.
Valid
Researcher and Engineer Automated Robotics and Expert Artificial Intelligence Systems
London, United Kingdom
# Cher _ in _ the _ good
A dose of awareness
# شير _ على _ معر _ مع

What is necessary for voice cloning to work?

OpenAI’s Voice Engine and Microsoft’s VALL‑E generate realistic speech from 3–15‑second samples.

Title:

Content: Chairman of the Board of Directors and Editors
I'm sorry.
Mohamad Elbaz
Editor-in-Chief
Wael Lotfy
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Editors
I'm sorry.
Mohamad Elbaz
Editor-in-Chief
Wael Lotfy
Microsoft has developed a language system that can mimic a person ’ s voice from a sample of just three seconds.
Microsoft has developed an intelligent language system, an AI-powered program that can mimic someone ’ s voice and mimic their voice from a three-second audio sample.
The new system, called VALL-E, converts written texts into audio clips, and speech can match both the speaker ’ s tone of voice and the way of talking — even room acoustics, where it can be used for custom or sophisticated text-to-speech applications.
Not only does the system create audio clips by writing random texts, but it can also take into account the reading style and tone of voice, to show the character of the original voice in the fake audio clips.
The system is still under development and research, but the project offers a high level of accuracy in simulating the factors and sound effects surrounding the speaker in the original clip of only 3 seconds, so that they are highlighted in the manufactured clips closer to the truth.
Samples of audio clips presented by "Microsoft" to reveal the capabilities of its new system, a precise level of the program in creating audio clips as recorded during a phone call, by quoting the style of sound and its level and intensity, from the original clip recorded to the user during his speech in fact.
And proved "Microsoft" through the audio clips published on the page of the new system on "JetHub" that the system can create audio clips in different ways, using the voice of one person.

VALL‑E 2 reaches human‑parity from seconds of audio but is unreleased due to abuse risks.

Title:

Content: What we know about Vall-E 2
According to these claims, Microsoft has developed a new artificial intelligence speech generator that is so adept that it can do more harm than good.
VALL-E 2 voices the text with the voice of a particular person, for which he needs only a few seconds of audio recording of the speech of this person.
Midjourney artificial intelligence has its own version of who is the president of the United States, and it ’ s not Biden
Microsoft researchers said that VALL-E 2 "has reached human parity."
It is capable of generating "accurate, natural speech by the voice of the original announcer, which can be compared to a human voice."
In other words, the new AI voice generator is convincing enough to be mistaken for a living person.
This opens up potentially dangerous opportunities for unscrupulous people.
VALL-E 2 is the latest achievement in speech models of neural codecs and marks an important milestone in text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis.
[...] VALL-E 2 consistently synthesizes high-quality speech, even for sentences that traditionally cause difficulties due to their complexity or repetitive phrases,
The developers write.
We ’ ve already seen examples of neural networks that are able to clone voices based on a multi-second recording, but Microsoft says its technology is superior to anything that has been on the market so far.
"Our experiments conducted on the LibriSpeech and VCTK datasets have shown that the VALL-E 2 is superior to previous TTS-systems [...] in reliability, naturalness and similarity to the speakers.
This is the first of its kind system that has reached parity with a person on these indicators, ” the article says.
The quality of the VALL-E 2 results depends on the length and quality of the speech prompts, as well as environmental factors such as background noise.
See also Google allows you to make your own copy of a celebrity to chat with her in a chatbot
What happens next with the technology
Despite its capabilities, Microsoft will not release VALL-E 2 to the public due to potential abuse risks.
Recently, we have seen a wave of fraud – both at the level of ordinary users, who are deceived by fraudsters, forging the voice of their relatives or friends, and at the level of state leaders who “call ” their voters, and celebrities who allegedly advertise cryptocurrencies and various fraudulent schemes in advertising.
VALL-E 2 is a research project.
We do not plan to include VALL-E 2 in the product or expand access to it for the public.
This may carry potential risks of abuse of the model, such as faking voice identification or impersonating a particular speaker,
The creators of the technology write.
But they suggest that artificial intelligence technology may find practical applications in the future.
VALL-E 2 can synthesize a language that retains the identity of the speaker, and can be used for educational training, entertainment, journalism, author content, accessibility features, interactive voice response systems, translation, chatbots, and more.
But to do this, you need to add a special protective protocol that will ensure that the speaker approves the use of his voice.

Deep learning models infer timbre, rhythm, and intonation to produce natural‑sounding TTS.

Deepdub, a film dubbing company, uses an AI to process voice and translate into a different language and promises to preserve what?

timbre
important vocal nuances
intonation

Models trained on English or classical Arabic may perform worse on other dialects.

What are some risks regarding AI voice clning?

NVIDIA’s RAD‑TTS and similar tools let users control tempo, pitch, and voice transformation.

Title:

Content: NEWS
NVIDIA told about its success in the synthesis of natural human speech by AI
NVIDIA told about its success in the synthesis of natural human speech by AI
Artificial intelligence now allows you to recreate the voice of virtual assistants in smartphones and smart speakers, very similar to human speech.
Although it is still possible to notice the differences between synthesized and live speech, which we hear in everyday conversation and in the media.
This is because humans speak with complex rhythms, intonations, and timbres that AI is difficult to replicate.
However, thanks to the work of NVIDIA, the differences are gradually blurring.
The company ’ s researchers create models and tools for high-quality controlled speech synthesis that convey the richness of human speech without sound artifacts.
Their latest designs are now on display at Interspeech 2021, which runs until September 3.
These models can help create voice automated customer service lines for banks and retailers, animate video game or book characters, and provide real-time speech synthesis for digital avatars.
NVIDIA ’ s creative team even uses this technology to create an expressive narrative for a series of videos about the possibilities of artificial intelligence.
Until recently, these rollers were voiced by a person.
Previous models of speech synthesis offered limited control over the tempo and pitch of the synthesized voice, so attempts to narrate artificial intelligence did not evoke the emotional response that a talented human speaker could give.
That changed over the past year, when NVIDIA ’ s text-to-speech research team developed more powerful and manageable speech synthesis models, such as RAD-TTS.
By teaching a text-to-speech model based on human speech, the RAD-TTS model can convert any text note into a speaker ’ s voice.
Another feature of the model is voice transformation, where the words of one speaker (or even singing) are transmitted by the voice of another speaker.
The RAD-TTS interface gives users the ability to accurately control the height, duration and energy of the synthesized voice at the frame level.
As a result, for example, a man can read a text and then convert it into a female voice.
The capabilities of the AI model go beyond voiceover.
Text-to-speech conversion can be used in games, to help people with voice impairments, or to help users translate between languages with their own voice.
AI can even recreate the performances of famous singers, combining not only the melody of the song, but also the emotional expression of the vocals.
Expressive speech synthesis is just one element of NVIDIA ’ s research into conversational AI.
This area also includes natural language processing, automatic speech recognition, keyword detection, sound enhancement, and more.
These developments were made using the NVIDIA NeMo toolkit and are open source solutions.
They are optimized to run efficiently on NVIDIA GPUs and are available for use by researchers and developers.
Source: NVIDIA
Report a typo
Text to be sent to our editors:

Entertainment uses include AI dubbing and reviving performers; ElevenLabs cloned Judy Garland and works with heirs of Laurence Olivier and James Dean.

Title:

Content: Sunday 07 July 2024
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Editors
Abdurrahim Ali
Editor-in-Chief
Dalia Abdul Rahim
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Editorial Board
Abdurrahim Ali
Editor-in-Chief
Dalia Abdul Rahim
Gate Light
Artificial intelligence tool narrates audiobooks with the voices of deceased actors
Follow the latest news through the app
Fans of classic films are now able to revive the voices of their late stars thanks to a new and controversial technology.
The British company Eleven Labs, launched by two Polish entrepreneurs, announced the development of an artificial intelligence tool capable of cloning the voices of late movie stars to be used to record audiobooks, articles and electronic documents.
Scary technique.
The new technique is based on the use of "generative" artificial intelligence models that are trained using real voice recordings of actors.
These models are able to analyze the acoustic patterns and recognize the subtleties that characterize the sounds of these stars, and then use this data to produce new recordings that are accurate and realistic.
Reviving the voice of Judy Garland
Judy Garland, best known for her timeless performance of "Somewhere Over the Rainbow" in the 1939 film The Wizard of Oz, was one of the first names to use the technique to revive her voice.
Lisa Minnelli, daughter of Judy Garland, expressed her delight at the move, noting that “it ’ s exciting to see our mother ’ s voice available to countless millions of people who love her. ”
Collaborating with celebrity heirs
The British company not only limited itself to Judy Garland, but also reached deals with the heirs of Sir Laurence Olivier, James Dean, and Burt Reynolds.
These deals allow fans of these stars to listen to audiobooks, novels and articles recorded with their voices.
Controversy and fears
Besides the enthusiasm aroused by this technique, there are also many concerns.
Last year, Hollywood saw a 118-day strike by actors who feared movie studios would replace them with technology.
These concerns are not unfounded, as the technology clearly demonstrates the ability of artificial intelligence to imitate human voices with astonishing realism.
Other uses of artificial intelligence in music
The initiative is part of a wider wave of artificial intelligence in the music and entertainment industry.
For example, Paul McCartney and film director Peter Jackson used an AI tool to isolate John Lennon's voice from an old recording, allowing them to finish "The Beatles' Last Song."
The live performances also saw the use of holographic technology to revive the performances of Michael Jackson and rapper Tupac.
Continuous development
Eleven Labs, founded by Matty Staniszowski and former Google engineer Piotr Dabkowski, has been a huge success and has raised millions of pounds, raising its value to more than $1 billion (£783 million).
The company also offers a wide range of other synthetic sounds, such as “middle-aged American male ” and“ optimistic millennials. ”
A controversial future.
As for the future of this technology, the question remains: will it still be a way to revive the legacy of late artists or will it spark further debate about the impact of technology on art and creativity?
It seems that artificial intelligence will continue to advance, which will allow us to rethink the concept of originality and creativity in the digital age.

Eleven Labs is extending its voice cloning services for which industries?

What company created an AI tool that could mimic the voices of deceased movie stars?

A high‑profile demo deepfaked France’s President Macron singing.

Title:

Content: AI voice cloning opens up vast areas for entertainment and counterfeiting
Cairo - Center Gate Wednesday 30 August 2023, 04: 14 pm
A French videographer uses Deep Vike to simulate the voices of current and outgoing politicians who are having a live conversation with Twitch users, including French President Emmanuel Macron and two of his famous predecessors, Charles de Gaulle and Jacques Chirac.
Anis Ayari, an artificial intelligence engineer and owner of a YouTube channel for scientific simplification called Defend Intelligence, was behind his “deep fakes ” as satirical content.
But the experiment took on negative dimensions on Tuesday, when a netizen asked the alleged Macron what the worst name was for a French village, and the artificial intelligence answered “La Mor or Juve ”, meaning“ Death to Jews ” in French, a small village in the Loire region of central France that was renamed in 2015.
This led to the immediate blocking of the canal.
The channel ’ s owner wrote in a previous Twitter message that he had filed an appeal against the decision and relaunched live streaming sessions on rival platform Kik.com.
Months ago, this expert, who promotes virtual “assistants ” to companies, also used deep fakes to get the French president to sing his voice a song by famous singer Charles Aznavour.
He revealed in a video the techniques he adopted in this video trick.
Reproduction of historical figures
Finally, Ayari began to clone historical or other current figures such as Elon Musk, engaging them in “discussions ” with current political players.
Anis Ayari says: “We will simulate a political debate and we will see where we get on this. ”
Artificial intelligence dominates Germany ’ s ‘ game show ’
Accomplishing tasks through artificial intelligence is a new concern for workers and professionals
Worried about its consequences.
Google ’ s artificial intelligence tool for writing news texts
To copy the voice of a character, it is enough to collect a few minutes of his speech, without any external interference.
Software then creates a model for his voice, allowing it to be used in new content, even in foreign languages.
“If we have 15 to 30 seconds of good quality, we start to get remarkable results.
There is no longer any need for computer programming. ”
Ayari launched an appeal to fund the live broadcast of his version of the French president.
Ayari asserts that using different information services costs him about 150 euros per day.
The "cynical" content
Tradition, however, has its limits, as the movement of the lips shows some loopholes.
Faced with absurd questions from some netizens, Emmanuel Macron in the copycat version gives strange answers, including, for example, “The subject of the pension system is out of my programming.
Let ’ s talk about more fun topics. ”
As the French president puts it in the AI-developed version, “My statement about my assets has the same credibility as the promises of a politician in his election campaign. ”
Anis Ayari points out that “there was a boom in the generation of votes last year, and it is accelerating. ”
Several projects are underway that will allow non-professionals to practice deep fakes in China, South Korea and Japan, where manga voices are popular.
Two artificial intelligence versions of the US president
On Trump or Biden 2024 via Twitch, two AI-developed versions of current US President Joe Biden and his predecessor, Donald Trump, engaged in a long summer exchange that continues under the watchful eye of hundreds of Internet users who can launch topics for discussion in writing.
Musicians have also paid a price for these technologies, as their voices have been reproduced in works of art without charge.
Actors, for their part, are concerned about the use of their studio images, and the information security community is witnessing a rise in phone-based phishing techniques.
But should we fear a new wave of disinformation using these technologies?
Anis Ayari answers, “The more people realize [the spread of deepfakes], the more critical they will feel. ”
On the other hand, he claims that the content he posted is “ironic. ”
More from the middle gate.
Related Titles
Stone Age village discovered in France after 150 years of excavation
Environmental disaster threatens UK's Wye River
French woman in US makes guitars from mycelium mushroom
(Video) Visitors flocked to an American park to watch a flower bloom with the smell of...
Malaysians say goodbye to baby panda before sending them back to China
More...
Most preferred in this section.

What are some risks regarding AI voice clning?

Accessibility gains include reading assistance, translation, and voices for nonverbal or speech‑impaired people.

Title:

Content: OpenAI, the creators of ChatGPT, provided a glimpse into their latest artificial intelligence (AI) innovation on Friday—a tool known as Voice Engine, capable of generating “natural-sounding speech” and mimicking human voices with remarkable accuracy. According to OpenAI’s blog post, Voice Engine can produce lifelike speech from just a single 15-second audio sample, closely resembling the original speaker.

This cutting-edge AI tool has far-reaching applications, including reading assistance, content translation, and providing a voice for individuals who are nonverbal or afflicted by speech conditions. Despite its potential benefits, OpenAI acknowledges the serious risks associated with Voice Engine, particularly in an election year.

Development of Voice Engine began in late 2022, with private testing conducted among a select group of trusted partners starting late last year. OpenAI stresses that these partners adhere to stringent usage policies, ensuring explicit consent from the original speaker and prohibiting unauthorized impersonation.

To maintain transparency, any audio generated by Voice Engine is watermarked to aid in tracing its origin. OpenAI advocates for widespread deployment of voice authentication to verify the original speaker’s consent and suggests implementing a “no-go voice list” to prevent the creation of voices resembling prominent figures.

Moreover, OpenAI recommends phasing out voice-based authentication for sensitive information access, such as bank accounts. Despite these precautions, the company remains cautious about releasing Voice Engine more broadly.

OpenAI aims to foster a dialogue on the responsible deployment of synthetic voices, considering societal adaptation to these advancements. Based on ongoing discussions and test results, the company will make informed decisions regarding the technology’s widespread deployment.

The unveiling of Voice Engine comes amid escalating concerns surrounding AI-generated deepfakes and their potential to propagate misinformation, particularly in the context of elections. As OpenAI navigates the ethical and societal implications of Voice Engine, the tech community awaits further insights into the future of this transformative AI tool.

By Impact Lab

How will AI Voice help educators with building courses?

Alexa mimicked a grandmother’s voice to read to a child after under a minute of audio.

Title:

Content: - A plus A.
OKAZ _ online @
Amazon has developed a program that can learn to imitate a person ’ s voice in less than a minute, although the tech giant has drawn criticism for presenting the program as a way to imitate the voices of deceased relatives.
The company showed the program through a video of the voice assistant "Alexa" reading the story of "The Wizard of Oz" to a young boy using the voice of his grandmother, Rohit Prasad, head of research Alexa, when viewing the video pointed to the fact that many people lost loved ones during the Corona pandemic.

What is necessary for voice cloning to work?

AI voices support impaired speakers, exemplified by actor Val Kilmer’s synthetic voice.

Title:

Content: • En
Warm!
Amazon Alexa voice assistant will be able to reproduce the voice of deceased relatives and friends
In the past few years, AI ’ s reproducibility of human voices has also gotten better, especially with the use of artificial intelligence and deep fake technology (Deepfake).
Amazon Alexa voice assistant. (Photo / Unsplash)
Technology comes from human nature, Amazon Alexa voice assistant will introduce a new "imitation voice" function, as long as less than a minute of audio files, even the voice of a deceased family member can be restored, the future Amazon will update the Alexa system to provide this service.
According to CNN, Amazon announced at its annual AI innovation conference re: MARS on Wednesday (22) that it will launch a feature that can mimic human voices, which is to use artificial intelligence technology to mimic any kind of sound, even deceased relatives, friends and lovers can mimic.
Rohit Prasad, Amazon ’ s senior vice president and chief scientist, said the updated system was able to collect enough voice data from less than a minute of audio to make personalization services like imitation possible, without the need to spend hours processing audio files like in a studio.
The concept comes from the use of new methods to add more “human attributes ” to AI, and in the face of the technology ’ s promise to reproduce the voices of deceased relatives and friends, Rohit Prasad said,“ Although AI cannot eliminate the pain of loss, it can definitely keep their memories alive. ”
Amazon has long used recognizable voices to voice Alexa, such as Samuel Jackson and other actresses, NBA players, and more.
But in the past few years, AI ’ s reproducibility of human voices has also gotten better, especially with the use of artificial intelligence and deep fakes.
This kind of AI has been used in different places in the past, such as Hollywood movie star Val Kilmer, who lost his voice due to throat cancer, has teamed up with startup Sonantic to create an AI-driven speaking voice for him in a new film.
According to foreign media reports, the company uses audio clips of Fang Ji Mo to achieve speech like a real actor through the algorithm.
Although Amazon has not said when it will launch the update, many experts believe it has the ability and technology to do so.
However, the “Valley of Terror effect ” may have an impact on the introduction of personalized Alexa sounds, as recreating a sound that is very similar to a loved one, but not 100% correct, may lead to resistance.
Updated: 2022-06-25 17: 32 GMT + 08: 00

Criminals use clones for ransom and impersonation scams, leveraging short audio to demand money.

Title:

Content: Scammers can use AI tools to clone the voices of you and your family—how to protect yourself

A robocall impersonating President Joe Biden urged New Hampshire voters not to participate in Tuesday's presidential primary — and it probably won't be the last AI voice scam this election season.

"Of course, this will be used by foreign nation states just like the trolling farms they already have. This is just another weapon in the arsenal," Adrianus Warmenhoven, a cybersecurity expert at NordVPN, tells CNBC Make It.

The fraudulent robocall begins by saying, "What a bunch of malarkey," in a voice that sounds like President Biden's, according to NBC News. The call then instructs recipients to "save your vote for the November election" and refrain from participating in the nation's first presidential primary, which is when voters choose which candidate they would like to be their political party's nominee in the general election.

New Hampshire's Attorney General's office says it has launched an investigation following a series of complaints about the robocalls.

"Although the voice in the robocall sounds like the voice of President Biden, this message appears to be artificially generated based on initial indications," the attorney general's office said in a Jan. 22 statement. "These messages appear to be an unlawful attempt to disrupt the New Hampshire Presidential Primary Election and to suppress New Hampshire voters."

Thanks to the rapid development of the type of AI technology used to clone and mimic people's voices, these types of AI-powered schemes are becoming more common — and scammers aren't just spoofing well-known public figures.

In March, the Federal Trade Commission issued a consumer alert warning people that scammers could target them by using AI technology to clone the voice of a family member in order to convince them to send the scammers money.

How to protect yourself from AI voice scams

Although it's getting harder to differentiate between what's real and what may be an AI-generated deepfake, there are a couple of steps you can take to protect yourself.

1. Fact-check and verify

When it comes to AI voice scams like the one involving Biden, you should double check that what you're hearing is actually correct, Warmenhoven says.

Although the spoofed version of President Biden voice told New Hampshire voters to "save" their votes for the November general election, a quick Google search reveals that registered Republicans and undeclared voters could cast their ballot in Tuesday's primary.

If you suspect you're being targeted by a cybercriminal, you can also check online to see if there have been any recent reports of AI-generated voice scams, Warmenhoven says.

2. End the call

If you decide to answer a call from an unknown number and it sounds like a panicked family member is asking you for money, try not to panic yourself.

Instead, end the call and try calling or texting the person using the number they've given you, rather than the one that called, to check that they're OK, Warmenhoven says.

The same goes if you receive a call from a scammer pretending to be your bank. Don't immediately believe their claims. Instead, end the call and call the number listed on your bank's website or on the back or your debit or credit card, he says.

It's especially important to get off the phone with these types of scammers, because they don't need an especially long clip of your voice in order to use AI to clone it.

"Even if you just say 'Hello? Is anybody there ?' or just mumble something, you'll give up lots of words and inflections in your voice and then [a scammer] can clone your voice," Warmenhoven says.

In May, McAfee researchers found that free online tools could be used to clone someone's voice using just three seconds of audio, per the computer software company's "The Artificial Imposter" report.

"Advanced artificial intelligence tools are changing the game for cybercriminals. Now, with very little effort, they can clone a person's voice and deceive a close contact into sending money," Steve Grobman, McAfee's chief technology officer, said in the report. "It's important to remain vigilant and to take proactive steps to keep you and your loved ones safe."

DON'T MISS: Want to be smarter and more successful with your money, work & life? Sign up for our new newsletter!

Want to land your dream job in 2024? Take CNBC's new online course How to Ace Your Job Interview to learn what hiring managers are really looking for, body language techniques, what to say and not to say, and the best way to talk about pay. Get started today and save 50% with discount code EARLYBIRD.

Contact Us

Authorities warn clones can fuel scams and election deception, requiring vigilance and verification.

Title:

Content: This website uses relevant technologies to provide a better reading experience, while respecting the privacy of users. Click here to understand the privacy statement of the Central News Agency. When you close this window, you agree to the above regulations.
Your browser does not appear to support Traditional Chinese.
Would you like to go to CNA ’ s English website, “Focus Taiwan ”?
Koko Koko Koko Koko Koko Koko
"日本語版「フィーカス」について" (in Japanese).
Central News First-hand News APP
Download
OpenAI Reveals New Voice Replication Tool Will Be Strictly Regulated to Prevent Abuse
2024 / 3 / 30 13: 38
Please agree to our privacy policy in order to enable news listening.
Please agree to our privacy policy in order to enable news listening.
U.S. artificial intelligence (AI) development company OpenAI today revealed a voice copying tool that intends to implement strict controls before implementing protection against speech fraud.
According to an OpenAI blog post sharing the results of the small scale test, the model, called Voice Engine, can mainly copy a person ’ s voice based on a 15-second sound sample.
San Francisco-based OpenAI said, “We acknowledge the significant risks involved in generating speech that resembles someone ’ s voice, especially given the election year … We work with U.S. and international partners in government, media, entertainment, education, civil society, and other areas to ensure that we incorporate their input into the build process. ”
Fake information researchers are concerned that AI-powered applications are being abused in a critical election year, as voice copying tools become more and more affordable, easy to use, and difficult to track.
OpenAI, which recognises these issues, said it would be cautious and kept abreast of wider releases "based on the potential for synthetic speech abuse."
A few months ago, a political adviser to a Democratic presidential primary candidate in the United States admitted to impersonating President Joe Biden ’ s voice by calling AI-generated automated voice calls that sounded like Biden ’ s call to voters not to vote in January ’ s New Hampshire primary.
The incident alarmed experts who feared a flood of AI-generated fake information ahead of the US presidential election in November and other important elections around the world.
OpenAI said that partners testing the Voice Engine have agreed to a number of specifications, including requiring that all voices copied by the tool be given explicit and informed consent.
OpenAI also said that it is also necessary to clearly inform the audience that the sound they hear is generated by AI.
“We have implemented a range of security measures, including digital watermarking to track the source of all audio generated by the Voice Engine and proactively monitor how the tool is used, ” OpenAI said.
(Translator: Zeng Yixuan / Review: Zhang Xiaowen) 1130330
Central News Agency "First-hand News" app
The text, pictures and audio and video of this website shall not be reproduced, broadcast or transmitted or used without authorization.
Please continue reading.
Electric Power Association: The development of AI computing power needs sufficient power, the government should support the deployment
172.30.142.201

What are some risks regarding AI voice clning?

Consumer guidance urges identity checks and AI‑voice detection to tell synthetic from human speech.

Title:

Content: Advertisement
Technology and Science
A very important feature.
This is the new Truecaller app!
29-05-2024 | 14: 00
A-
A +
photos 0
A +
A-
Caller ID service Truecaller has launched the world ’ s first AI voice detection feature, the “AI Call Scanner ”, to enhance its anti-spam and fraud capabilities.
This innovative tool uses artificial intelligence to identify sounds made by artificial intelligence during phone calls and alert users in real time.
Advertisement
Voice scams using artificial intelligence that mimic human voices for financial extortion have been on the rise since they first appeared around 2019.
Fraudsters often use social media to collect voice samples and train AI to clone voices, which they then use to deceive a person ’ s family.
Aware of the growing threat, Truecaller has developed an AI Call Scanner tool to combat these complex scams.
Truecaller designed the “AI Call Scanner ” feature to distinguish between human sounds and sounds made by artificial intelligence, protecting users from scams.
The service has integrated this feature into its Android app, part of the premium subscription, and is rolling out in the United States first, followed by India and other major Truecaller markets.
When receiving a suspicious call, users can tap a button within the app to activate the “AI Call Scanner ” and the call then integrates with a secure line that records a sample of the caller ’ s voice.
This sample is analyzed by Truecaller ’ s advanced AI model, which quickly determines whether the voice is human or artificial intelligence.
In order to use the AI Call Scanner feature, Truecaller must be set as your default calling app, and if the call looks suspicious, you can tap the Start AI Detection button in the app to briefly suspend the call while the AI analyzes the audio.
A message appears saying “analysis, ” indicating that the AI is working, and during the call you receive a message stating whether the sound is human or made by the AI, allowing you to take immediate action.
Truecaller says it is also exploring ways to improve the AI Call Scanner feature, including enhancing accuracy, reducing response times and adapting to new audio compositing technologies.
(aitnews)
Go ahead.
Advertisement
Our news via your email
SIGN UP

What has the US Federal Trade Commission warned about the use of voice cloning tools?

Difficult to distinguish from human voice

Americans lost an estimated $2.6 billion to voice‑cloning fraud in 2022.

Title:

Content: Opinions and Articles
Motasem Akra: Yankee sanctions and the technology of the voice of death and life
Yankee sanctions and the sound of life and death technology
To prevent intentional or honest misunderstandings, we start with questions and then answer them:
Is my girlfriend alive?: I don't know.
There is no conclusive evidence.
Is the man dead?
Oh, I don't know.
There's no evidence.
Is the man hurt?
I don't know, but if he's alive, the probability of injury is very likely, but there's also no conclusive evidence.
Has the audio recording of my Hameedi resolved the controversy?
Because the astonishing development in the reproduction of sounds allows for the perfect falsification of a speech with the same voice and tone as the person to whom it is attributed.
The quality of the reproduction of sounds is such that it is possible to take a sample of the voice of a girl and produce a speech that she did not say, but it contains all the details of her voice, including crying and crying to a degree of perfection believed by her mother, who took her out of her stomach and chatted with her countless daily hours.
A few months ago, Western media including The Guardian and CNN reported the story of a woman who believed a call cloned from the voice of her eldest daughter, 15-year-old Brianna.
Brianna went away to train for a ski race.
In the absence of the girl, the mother ’ s phone rang and her daughter ’ s voice greeted her with screaming and wailing.
A man said he had kidnapped the girl and demanded a ransom of $1 million, which he later reduced to $50,000.
The mother told CNN: “It sounded just like my daughter ’ s voice, in terms of tone, everything. ”
Federal officials say such schemes have become more complex, and that some modern crimes have one thing in common: cloned voices.
The growth of cheap and accessible AI software has allowed con artists to clone sounds and create excerpts of dialogue that look like reality.
This crime is so common that Americans lost $2.6 billion in 2022 in such frauds.
A reasonably good clone can be created with less than a minute of sound, and some claim that a few seconds may be enough as a sample to allow complex cloning.
Note first that all the cloning needs is a sample less than a minute of sound.
He added that there is a wealth of samples in which the team speaks in audio and video hours, hours and days.
Second, note that the programs of voice reproduction are cheap and available to any ordinary criminal as it allows the reproduction of a mother in the voice and crying and whining of an object that emerged from her womb and whistled in a daily adhesion did not break or break.
Moreover, the rapid support and its allies abroad have Qarun ’ s money and access to the latest trends in civilian and military technology that are not available in the market or are expensive.
Third, he noted that the reference here is not for rapid technical support capabilities, as the Janjaweed is just a front for a regional bloc with political, financial, military and technological influence of the first degree.
This point is made clear by the fact that Rapid Support runs an empire — military, financial, economic, investment, political, diplomatic, media — that is vast, complex and complex.
Despite the complex complexity of the conflict environment in its local, regional and global dimensions, Rapid Support manages all these files with a rare and admirable skill.
But it is paradoxical to compare the dexterity of managing a complex rapid support empire with the minuscule intellectual ceiling of most of his leadership.
It is clear that this difficult management exceeds the capabilities of the Janjaweed intellectual and technical cadre, leaving no doubt that the real management of the rapid support empire is carried out by external parties at a high and global level of qualification, funding and access.
I also noticed that General Hemeti used phrases that are not common in Sudan, such as the phrase “Ya ’ ib al-Shoum ”, which he repeated more than once.
This is a shameful term that is not widely used in Sudan.
He also used the term “yashrasheh ” in the description of the team al-Burhan, which is also an unpopular phrase that came to its head in the 1980s and then removed from the dictionary of youth (adults usually choose a conservative language).
Some have suggested that Hemeti wanted to say that al-Burhan was “suspicious ” of the Corniche, but out of chastity he chose to run instead.
In any case, the use of the term shatran has declined, but this does not negate its circulation in limited pockets.
The question here is what prompted the team Hemeti to use a Levantine or uncommon vocabulary that I have not heard from him in the past.
Lieutenant General Hemedti is an eloquent speaker who is rich in Bedouin vocabulary, but his political and urban vocabulary is limited outside the vernacular of the Bedouin.
I should be careful in what I mentioned above, I do not claim to be acquainted with all the vocabulary and dialogues of the team Daglo in the past or a quarter.
These words may exist for any reason in his dictionary and there may be an understandable justification for them that I do not know.
All I meant here was to raise points without making judgments.
The bottom line is that the audio recording doesn ’ t prove that Hemeti ’ s team is alive, and that doesn ’ t mean I have to pretend or even guess that he ’ s dead.
All I ’ ve said is that modern technological development means that audio recording cannot be established as definitive evidence of a man ’ s life.
I do not claim his death or his life, but his absence from the cameras raises questions about his existence, or at least about his health.
In a related case, the U.S. government announced sanctions against Mr. Abdul Rahim Dagalo for ethnically targeting crimes in western Sudan.
The question arose as to why the US government would punish Mr. Abdul Rahim and keep silent about General Dagalo.
There are two possible explanations.
The first explanation is that the administration wanted to send a stern warning without burning Hemeti because his presence is important for negotiating any settlement and implementing it, and then serious guidance against him is difficult to negotiate a solution with him because the US administration and other intermediaries will be embarrassed to adopt a deal with someone whom it accused of crimes in the gravity of racial targeting and sexual slavery.
The second possibility is that the US administration does not know whether Hemeti is alive or dead or in the house between the two houses.
So she decided to hedge against possible ridicule if it later turned out that she had sanctioned a corpse or a semi-corpse.
However, the choice of General Abdul Rahim is an acknowledgement by the US government of the fact that the war in Sudan is actually managed, even if at a low degree, by Abdul Rahim and not Hemeti, while the political management is in the hands of Mr. Yousef Ezzat, who appears and happens to be a full-fledged insolent figure of the outputs of the universities of fifty-six countries rather than a fierce Bedouin warrior.
Mu ’ tasem is knocking.

The FCC prohibits robocalls using AI‑generated voices under the TCPA without prior express written consent.

Title:

Content: Moving at rapid speed, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has just announced its unanimous adoption of a new Declaratory Ruling finding that voice calls using artificial intelligence (AI)-generated voices fall under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).

The ruling takes effect immediately and gives state attorneys general powerful new tools to go after voice cloning scams. Under FCC rules, telemarketers that use robocalls subject to the TCPA are required to obtain prior express written consent from the consumer unless an exemption applies. The TCPA has always prohibited the use of both prerecorded and artificial voices but advances in AI-generated voices have prompted the FCC to specifically address their use.

In recent years, scammers and other parties have begun using AI to create fake and even "cloned" artificial voices, including those of celebrities, politicians, and even a call recipient's family member. In this election season, there has been increasing concern about the use of voice clones to engage in voter suppression schemes.

Concerned about the potential malevolent uses of these AI-generated voice calls, the FCC issued a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) in November on the topic of "Implications of Artificial Intelligence Technologies on Protecting Consumers from Unwanted Robocalls and Robotexts." In the NOI, the FCC asked questions regarding the use of "AI-influenced" technologies in robocalling. A coalition of 26 state attorneys general, as well as a telecommunication carrier trade group, strongly urged the FCC to take action to give the attorneys general clear authority to act against AI-generated robocall violators.

The FCC now has made clear that the use of voice cloning in telephone calls and texts falls within the FCC's statutory authority under the TCPA. A major intent of the ruling is to communicate that the TCPA "does not allow for any carve-out of technologies that purport to provide the equivalent of a live agent, thus preventing unscrupulous businesses from attempting to exploit any perceived ambiguity in our TCPA rules."

As FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel explained, "with this Declaratory Ruling, we will have another tool to go after voice cloning scams and get this junk off the line."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

U.S. authorities have banned AI‑generated voice calls used for fraud.

Title:

Content: Artificial Intelligence Calls Banned for Fraud
US authorities have banned automated calls using voices generated by artificial intelligence (AI) software as part of efforts to combat fraud and misinformation enabled by the technology.
In a statement, Federal Communications Commission Chairperson Jessica Rosenworcel said that malicious actors use voices created by artificial intelligence in unwanted phone calls for various purposes, including blackmailing individuals, impersonating celebrities, and misleading voters.
She warned “the scammers behind these phone calls. ”
The committee said its decision, which goes into effect immediately, makes the voice cloning techniques used in these automated calls, known in English as robocalls, illegal and considered fraud on consumers.
The significant development of generative artificial intelligence over the past year has raised concerns that have led to several attempts to regulate the use of this technology, which allows the creation of content (text, images and sounds) on simple request in everyday language.
“The increase in these types of calls has accelerated in recent years as this technology allows consumers to be deceived with misleading information by mimicking the voices of celebrities, political candidates and close family members. ”
In this context, forged phone calls using the voice of President Joe Biden have recently emerged dissuading New Hampshire residents from voting in the Democratic primary.
An investigation is under way into a "possible illegal attempt to disrupt" the vote.
In October, Biden signed a decree to improve the regulation of artificial intelligence in terms of its impact on security, justice and the labor market.
One of the main recommendations of the text is the development of tools to facilitate the monitoring of content produced by artificial intelligence.
Jessica Rosenworcel said on Thursday that “new tools to crack down on these frauds and ensure the protection of the public from fraud and misinformation will be available to state prosecutors from now on. ”
Suggest a correction.

Commentators warn unregulated cloning can exploit artists and undermine livelihoods in music and beyond.

Title:

Content: EXCLUSIVE - Recording exec's warning to top Republican on rise of AI: Expert tells Marsha Blackburn 'fake music' is illegal and may destroy the livelihoods of musicians and artists

  • Chairman and CEO of the Recording Industry Association of America Mitch Glazier spoke with Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., on her 'Unmuted' podcast
  • AI programs are creating new content using 'voice cloning' based off an already-established artist's work without their permission and without compensation

Artificial Intelligence (AI) created 'fake music' using 'voice cloning' technology is beginning to infiltrate the recording industry, negatively impacting artist compensation and poising other challenges to copyright laws, according to a top recording executive.

Chairman and CEO of the Recording Industry Association of America Mitch Glazier spoke with Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., on her 'Unmuted' podcast and outlined a number of issues poised by AI-generated programs.

The clip, first obtained by DailyMail.com, the pair discussed challenges facing the music industry due to the rise of AI programs creating new content using 'voice cloning' based off an already-established artist's work.

Glazier, who has worked for over 20 years on the music industry's transition to streaming services, told Blackburn it is a 'double whammy' that AI programs are able to produce 'fake music' and also steal an artist's unique voice without proper compensation.

Chairman and CEO of the Recording Industry Association of America Mitch Glazier spoke with Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., on her 'Unmuted' podcast

'The artist and their partners should and do own their work. That's the entire constitutional premise that we've all fought for for so long - that this is the sweat of your brow, this is your genius,' Glazier said. 'You get to own this you get to create it, you get to decide who gets to use it and how and when it comes to your voice and your image and your likeness.'

He called it extremely 'personal' that someone can basically steal your essence and put your voice on a song 'you never meant to record' or that doesn't reflect your own experience.

'It can be putting it on something that you definitely wouldn't want to say,' he added.

'And so the the ability of these AI platforms to produce what I would call 'fake music' or inauthentic music at the rate that they do so and then to steal an artists voice to do it. It's almost like a double whammy,' continued Glazier.

Blackburn agreed, saying there are a 'sequence of problems' that are stemming from the unauthorized replication of work, which goes into copyright law issues.

The CEO explained how copyright laws have been violated through the use of AI technologies.

'The AI platform is taking an exact copy - under law we call it a 'reproduction' - which means that a rights been violated and you deserve to be compensated for it,' Glazier told Blackburn.

He said that when making an exact copy, the creator has an 'obligation' to get a license for the use, as YouTube and Spotify do - which is a partnership so both sides thrive.

'You're not supposed to break the law and ask questions later, which is what's happening,' he continued.

Glazier has praised the work of the Human Artistry Campaign, which put together 'principles for AI' that he says will help protect the work of 'human creators.'

He added that not all AI technologies are bad, and often help propel and supplement creative music work.

Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., on her 'Unmuted' podcast outlined a number of issues poised by AI-generated programs

During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing earlier this month, Blackburn questioned OpenAI CEO Sam Altman about some of the issues facing the music industry

But there are 'basic rules' that need to be followed to ensure artists get the value they are deserved.

'As AI technologies advance, we need basic rules of the road to ensure that artists, creators, performers, and their works are respected and valued,' he tweeted.

The principles note that technology has long 'empowered' human expression and will continue to do so.

It also urges lawmakers to not back any copyright exemptions that might allow AI developers to 'exploit' artists and the interests of creators should be central in any future policy making processes.

During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing earlier this month, Blackburn questioned OpenAI CEO Sam Altman about some of the issues facing the music industry.

Blackburn pressed Altman during the hearing to commit to not training 'AI models on artists' and songwriters' copyrighted works, or use their voices and their likenesses without first receiving their consent.'

Altman did not directly commit to Blackburn's request.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., opened the hearing by playing an AI-generation of his own voice.

Recording exec warns top Republican on issues stemming from rise of AI and 'fake music'

The comments below have not been moderated.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

The Scarlett Johansson case spotlights consent and likeness issues and difficulties with legal remedies.

Title:

Content:

When tech goes bad: Celebrities and the dangers of deepfake technology

Find out how the use of deepfake technology is causing celebrities distress and bringing up important ethical issues in the digital era, as seen in the cases of Scarlett Johansson and Rashmika Mandanna.

By  Varun ShethMay 22, 2024 5:36 PM
The recent controversy around Scarlett Johansson's artificial intelligence (AI) voice resemblance highlights the widespread danger that deepfake technology poses to prominent personalities. (Image sourced via Forbes)

Artificial intelligence breakthroughs have given rise to deepfakes, which can produce realistic-looking but completely fake material. Although there are innovative and entertaining uses for this technology, its abuse has created serious moral and legal issues. Deepfake deceptions have made celebrities in particular great targets, with potentially disastrous consequences for both their personal and professional life. The recent controversy around Scarlett Johansson's artificial intelligence (AI) voice resemblance highlights the widespread danger that deepfake technology poses to prominent personalities.

The video that started the deepfake controversy featured British-Indian influencer Zara Patel, whose face had been Photoshopped to seem like actress Rashmika Mandanna. Following the outcry caused by the viral video, Mandanna expressed her extreme distress. Her comment brought to light the horrifying consequences of deepfake technology. Similar to this, there have been concerns raised regarding the improper use of deepfake technology in the entertainment business when an altered photo of Katrina Kaif from her upcoming film "Tiger 3" appeared online.

Hollywood legend Tom Hanks was forced to post a caution on social media earlier this month over the usage of an AI-generated image of himself in a misleading dental plan advertisement. Hanks stressed in a post to his 9.5 million Instagram followers that his picture was being used without permission.

Despite legal obstacles, Scarlett Johansson encountered deepfake issues when her face was transformed for pornographic films. She acknowledged the difficulties in taking legal action against these AI-generated movies and emphasised the size of the internet and the difficulties in policing content of this kind. Johansson had yet another incident lately when her vocal resemblance appeared in OpenAI's ChatGPT 4.0 system. This time, she filed a lawsuit, which ultimately forced OpenAI to remove the voice.

Jimmy Donaldson, better known online as Mr. Beast, was the target of a dishonest TikTok advertisement that used fraudulent AI to promise viewers $2 iPhones. This instance demonstrated how frauds linked to deepfake may propagate bogus information and trick viewers into accepting fictitious claims. Donaldson's experience shows how deepfakes may be used in scams, making attempts to oversee and regulate the technology even more difficult.

Tags
First Published on May 22, 2024 5:36 PM

More from Storyboard18

How it Works

Shah Rukh Khan admitted to Ahmedabad hospital due to heatstroke

How it Works

ASCI finds healthcare and illegal betting top violative sector in FY24

How it Works

TRAI hosts meeting of regulators to combat spam calls, messages

How it Works

BJP’s political ads hit it off with the public, six in ten say it influenced them to cast a vote

How it Works

Failed Zee-Sony merger cost Zee a whopping Rs 432 crore

How it Works

Celebrity image protection explained: Understanding personality rights and legal options

How it Works

Big tech's data advantage and opaque algorithms threaten fair competition: CCI’s Ravneet Kaur

Policy experts urge clear laws defining legal uses, mandating transparency, and enabling enforcement.

Title:

Content: Freedom Square (Beishe Review) Policy response strategy for artificial intelligence deep counterfeiting and voice copying technology
◎ Cai Yue Ting
Deep hypocrisy and voice copying are technologies that use artificial intelligence to generate fake or manipulative media that can be used for a variety of purposes, including entertainment, education, and journalism.
If it is abused for fraud and the dissemination of false information, it will damage the reputation and rights of the individual, and it will affect social order and national security.
Because there are major potential hazards, it is necessary to formulate relevant regulations and effective management, and it can promote the healthy development of this innovative industry.
Consolidating practice cases to standardize policy measures to manage deep counterfeiting and voice copying can go hand in hand with the following aspects:
I. Regulations:
The content of the bill should include: (1) clearly stipulate the legal and illegal use of deep counterfeiting and voice copying to protect personal and national security and rights; (2) establish effective enforcement mechanisms and regular amendments to ensure the effective implementation of the law and adapt to the rapid development of technology; (3) use ethics education and advocacy; and (4) specify appropriate punitive measures.
2. Technical supervision:
(1) Establish an effective enforcement mechanism, consisting of experts with professional knowledge and technical ability, to (1) supervise the development and application of deep counterfeiting and voice reproduction technology to ensure that the use of the technology complies with laws, regulations and ethical standards; (2) adhere to the principle of minimum intervention, and strike a balance between protecting personal privacy and preventing abuse; and (3) promote the sound development of the industry.
Restrictions on use: Restrictions on the use of deep counterfeiting and voice copying technologies, especially in sensitive areas such as finance, politics, law, and medicine, and where they may have a serious impact on personal privacy.
Transparency and Authentication: (1) Require developers and users of deep counterfeiting and voice copying technologies to provide transparency to ensure that users are informed and consent to the use of their data.
(2) Establish a certification mechanism to ensure that only accredited institutions and individuals can use these technologies.
(4) Technical research: Encourage research on deep counterfeiting and voice copying technologies, especially research on detecting and preventing abuse, and research on how to protect personal privacy.
Participation, use of ethics education and public awareness: to strengthen the education of the public and related industries, and to raise awareness of the potential risks of deep counterfeiting and voice copying technology.
Authorities should provide corresponding preventive measures and education and training.
The development of deep counterfeiting and voice reproduction technology has brought many potential risks, but it is also an integral part of the country ’ s sustainable development.
This industry requires the participation of multiple stakeholders, how to ensure that these technologies are used responsibly and ethically through legal, technical and educational means, and to minimize their potential hazards, to the rapid and vigorous development of the industry is a matter of urgency.
(The author is Deputy Secretary General of Beishe, Director of Research and Development of the Institute for Information Technology)
No need to smoke, no need to grab, now use the APP to watch the news, guarantee the daily winning point I download the APP
I've added friends, thank you.
Welcome to [Free Commentary]
It's a compliment. Good.
It has been praised, thank you.
Editor 's Choice

Ethical debates span permission, privacy, and misinformation alongside accessibility and education benefits.

Title:

Content: The scary side of artificial intelligence

The pros of AI outweigh the Cons or threats in our day-to-day lives, and there’s no magic pill to protect us from the scary threats of AI.

  • Exclusive

It's a free Content, simply login/signup to unlock

Get in-depth Industry Insights and Analysis through our “Exclusive” content, presented to you by our esteemed panel of writers, for free

By continuing, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge our Privacy Policy. This same account can be used across all Economic Times B2B portals.

  • Updated On Oct 3, 2023 at 03:02 PM IST

Artificial intelligence (AI), as we all know, is the simulation of human intelligence leveraging computer systems and machines. AI programs can continuously learn and evolve with experience. In technical terms, AI systems render the output by churning and analyzing the data for correlations and patterns and help make future predictions using these patterns.

Advt
Today AI is being used extensively in all facets of our lives starting from lifestyle, e-commerce, home appliances, automobiles, navigation, transport, healthcare, agriculture, education, financial planning, chatbots, marketing, cyber security, virtual assistant, industrial automation and many more.

Clearly, we have and are leveraging the strengths of AI to the fullest to automate the routine tasks and make it auto-learn over a period. There’s no doubt that AI has revolutionized the lives of all – organizations, consumers etc. But as they say, “Everything comes at a price”. This analogy is quite true for AI as well, there have been a lot of threats that have emerged using AI and are being utilized by the Cyber criminals to dupe the ignorant users, cause mental stress and extort money.

continued below

Executive Workshop

I’m not going to delve into all of threats but would like to elucidate some of the real ones that have come to the surface recently:

Voice cloning or mimicry

As the name suggests, it uses machine learning algorithms to simulate anyone’s voice. It requires certain voice data to analyze and learn the specific patterns of any individual. There are certain advantages of cloning a voice that can be used in voice assistants, chatbots, navigation systems and other areas. Voice cloning has existed for a while but was restricted to experts who possess the technical knowledge to be able to use the same. But now AI Voice cloning tools are available on the open Internet that anyone can leverage with literally no technical knowledge or cost to clone anyone’s voice. All you need to do is just Google and it will pop up and get a bunch of both free and paid AI Voice cloning tools.

Advt
In fact, recently one of the global leaders in online protection published a report stating how AI is fueling a rise in online voice scams, with just three seconds of audio required to clone a person’s voice. This is extremely creepy. Just imagine, if a Cyber-criminal clones your voice and tricks your near ones by making them believe that they are talking to you, and request for money due to any distress reasons. In fact, these are not assumptions but real-life incidents that are happening across the world every minute.

Deepfakes AI

Deepfakes AI are being used to impersonate an individual by manipulating videos, images, audios, and other content available on the social media platforms using deep learning techniques. It mainly transforms existing content from one person to another. This is another area that has been exploited by the Cyber criminals in the recent past, and there are a few deepfake cases that have made waves on the Internet. One of the most famous ones being Deepfake created by a VFX artist of one of Hollywood’s most famous male actors. This piece was so well made by rendering thousands of pictures using artificial versions of the actor. There are similar Deepfakes incidents involving other global celebrities and leaders. The damage and misuse of the deepfakes videos could be extremely dangerous for the human society and can be used by terrorists to incite riots and create nuisance.

Creating virtual people

This is another area where AI is being used to create people that do not exist. There are a lot of websites that allow you to generate a random image by just specifying the age group, gender & ethnicity, and you can continue to refresh these images at the click of a button. Be mindful of the fact that these images pertain to people that do not exist in this world. On the similar lines, there’s an emerging trend of AI news anchors that possess a human-like appearance and are fed data that they can read using text-to-speech technology. Recently, there's been a surge of AI-Driven robotic new anchors in multiple language channels. While the main objective of this initiative is to provide royalty free or cost-effective human images for branding and other purposes. However, the overuse of these technologies causes Fear of missing out (FOMO), Feeling of inadequacy, dissatisfaction, and isolation may potentially lead to psychological and emotional vulnerabilities.

One of the Hollywood movies, ‘HER’ portrayed an introverted and lonely writer (Joaquin Phoenix) who purchases an AI virtual assistant personified through a female voice to assist him in his writing job. However, when he finds out about its ability to learn and adapt, he falls in love with it. The film delves into emotional vulnerability and the impact of AI on human relationships.

Needless to say, that the pros of AI outweigh the Cons or threats in our day-to-day lives, and there’s no magic pill to protect us from the scary threats of AI. However, there are certain preventive tips that one can follow to mitigate any such risks. Do spread awareness with your family and friends:

  • Set some code words with family, and friends to verify the identity during emergency circumstances
  • Optimize social media presence by limiting your connections with only known contacts and avoid connecting with any unknown ones
  • Avoid saying ‘Yes’ as a greeting while receiving unknown calls as it can be used to authorize credit card charges or other purposes
  • Continuously update privacy settings on social media to allow viewing by friends and family only
  • Avoid clicking on any suspicious links or calls received without proper due diligence
  • Do not share your passwords and other sensitive information with anyone
  • Verify the credentials of any online information before circulating it through various mediums
  • Avoid public Wi-Fi connections offered at coffee shops or airports, which requires to enter password
  • Closely monitor the time spent by younger generation on social media and online gaming
  • Finally, in case of any suspicion, double check and report it to the host site or concerned authorities
The author is the CIO of MOVIN

Disclaimer: The views expressed are solely of the author and ETCIO does not necessarily subscribe to it. ETCIO shall not be responsible for any damage caused to any person/organization directly or indirectly.

  • Published On Oct 3, 2023 at 03:02 PM IST

Most Read in Artificial Intelligence

Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals

Subscribe to our newsletter to get latest insights & analysis.

Download ETCIO App

  • Get Realtime updates
  • Save your favourite articles

What are some risks regarding AI voice clning?