Geoffrey Hinton, the "godfather of AI," pioneered neural networks and deep learning.

He has studied the brain and built artificial neural networks since the 1970s.

He co-founded DNNresearch, which Google bought for $44 million in 2013.

He spent about a decade at Google, including on Google Brain.

In 2018 he received the A.M. Turing Award for advances in neural nets and deep learning.

His work underpins systems like Bard and ChatGPT, which he says makes him uneasy.

He left Google in 2023 to speak freely about AI risks.

He warns AI may soon surpass human intelligence and become hard to control.

He thinks this could come sooner than expected, threatening human existence.

He estimates a 10% chance AI could cause human extinction.

He urges regulation and government action, as progress is outpacing safety.

He cites risks of misuse, misinformation, reinforced bias, and job disruption.

He notes AI can learn and share knowledge rapidly if not controlled.

He has expressed regret for his contributions as risks became clearer.

He did not sign the pause petition, instead urging political involvement and oversight.

Elon Musk and Steve Wozniak have urged caution or a moratorium on advanced AI.

The UN Secretary-General and UK Prime Minister call for international coordination.

A UK Parliament committee warns of AI’s existential threat and many challenges.

Google pledges responsible AI, e.g., reducing bias via a Harvard skin tone scale.

Some experts estimate a 4–20% chance of a globally impactful AI incident, prompting industry leaders to prioritize risk mitigation.

AI development should be transparent and responsible to balance benefits and risks.

Governments and alliances are adding oversight like the EU AI Act to ensure safety, human oversight, and rights.

Hinton urges labeling AI-generated content and more AI safety investment to oversee powerful systems.

His warnings underscore the need for responsible development to protect jobs, information, and safety.

Geoffrey Hinton, the "godfather of AI," pioneered neural networks and deep learning.

Title:

Content: AI ’ s “godfather ” interviewed by the BBC, warning that artificial intelligence may be smarter than humans
AI ’ s “godfather ” interviewed by the BBC, warning that artificial intelligence may be smarter than humans
Geoffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather ” of artificial intelligence (AI), has resigned from Google.
He warned that developments in the field of artificial intelligence pose increasing dangers.
In a statement to The New York Times, Dr. Hinton said he regretted his current job.
Dr. Hinton ’ s pioneering research in neural networks and deep learning paves the way for current AI systems such as Google ’ s Bard chatbot and Microsoft ’ s ChatGPT.
The cognitive psychologist and computer scientist told the BBC that chatbots may soon be smarter than humans.

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

He has studied the brain and built artificial neural networks since the 1970s.

Title:

Content: -- -- -- / -- -- --
Site Management
The genie of artificial intelligence.
One of the Arab fairy tales says that a hunter launched a genie trapped in his bottle hundreds of years ago, and after he got out of control went on a search for tricks to return him to his prison in vain, and this is what is happening now with the world ’ s tech giants, who have moved from the race to dominate artificial intelligence systems to try to restrain this “monster ” that is moving faster than everyone expected.
This tremendous acceleration in the development of artificial intelligence systems since the end of 2022, appeared after the launch of the chat robot “Chat GBT ” for OpenEye with the support of Microsoft, to follow the search giant Google system rival named“ Bard ”, and infected other giants of technology such as Amazon and the engine “Yandex ” Russian and the readiness of Chinese companies such as the engine“ Baidu ” to launch similar robots.
The artificial intelligence systems that are being developed suggest that the world is coming to a stage where the science fiction films we ’ ve been watching on TV will become a reality and the machine will replace the human mind in managing everything.
This artificial intelligence relies on algorithms that allow the machine to learn on its own, by simulating neurons in the human body, the artificial neural networks that have been developed have the ability to learn in a generative way, extract basic characteristics from the data and make decisions.
What is strange about this feverish race between the giants of technology is that his godparents began a counter-campaign to warn him, and went so far as to consider him a danger to humanity, and some even went on to expect the extinction of the human race because of it, and that it matches the nuclear danger and deadly epidemics.
This prediction of humanity ’ s black future came not from ordinary observers or soothsayers, but from the Canadian scientist Jeffrey Hinton called the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” who since the 1970s has been obsessed with how the human brain works and tries to imitate it on computers.
In recent years, Hinton ’ s research has made a breakthrough in artificial intelligence, so that one of his students was behind the launch of the famous chat robot “ChatGT ”, while he worked for years at“ Google ” and decided to resign months ago, and announced his “regret ” for the development of these programs, and his expectations that the machine will outperform man after nearly 50 years, but now he warns that the current race will make it a reality.
The diagnosis made by this scientist makes sense, given that the consequences of the widespread uncontrolled use of AI robots are visible, and there have been many cases around the world of the misuse of these programs.
Several universities have found cases of cheating using chatbots, and using them even to write books and research, and also imagine that there are those who ask “Chat JBT ” for example for fatwas on doctrinal issues, note that these programs do not differentiate during the provision of answers between publications for someone through networks and research in a book published by a famous scientist.
The widespread use of these robots in the coming years may even lead to the disintegration of societies due to the infusion of a large amount of inaccurate information and fake news, due to the common belief that what these platforms offer is objective truth, as well as the threat of science itself, because people in the past learn through observation and careful research and rely on logic and critical thinking.
There have also been concerns that machines will replace humans in future jobs and even create robotic armies and dispense with the human element in wars, and the concept of sovereignty that we know now has changed with the dominance of technology companies in the world.
This seems to be the point in the calls launched by the godfathers of artificial intelligence in America and the West to freeze its development until the establishment of controls, and that the logic of “monopoly ” is the main driver of this step, given that eastern countries such as China and Russia have taken parallel steps in this field.
Add your comment
All fields are required, and your email will not be published.
Please adhere to the site policy in the comments.
Your comment has been sent for review, it will be published after approval!
COMMENTS
0.
Excuse me! Excuse me!
There is no content to show!

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

He co-founded DNNresearch, which Google bought for $44 million in 2013.

Title:

Content: • |
• Fast Quote
• |
• Member
• Product Services / Streaming
• Settings
12 / 05 / 2023
The White House ordered AI to be evaluated, and the European Union proposed legislation to regulate AI, teach AI to be human or the best solution!
• Add Favorite Column
• Collection of articles
• Fang Zhanqi
Fang Zhanze
When I was a teenager, I studied Geographic Information System, but unfortunately I didn ’ t learn anything and I graduated with luck.
After adulthood, the accidental hit into the media circle, first and then in the print, electronic, online media to roll, slightly small.
After middle age, he completed a master ’ s degree in information technology and gradually expanded his horizons. He was determined to join a start-up company and explore different fields of technology.
In recent years, he has been actively engaged in data analysis and digital strategies, and has also been involved in the development of Location Intelligence projects. Sometimes, he can also take time to teach, not only to share what he has learned with others, but also to motivate himself to keep learning for life.
Tales of Wisdom City
Generative AI is definitely the hottest topic in the technology world today. After the popularity of ChatGPT, many companies rushed to launch similar products and gradually applied them to various industries.
But more and more people are worried that when AI is fully popularized, it will aggravate the problem of fake information flow, online fraud and other problems; even Sheffield Hinton, who is known as the "godfather of AI", is worried that AI will become too smart, afraid that it will evolve into a killer robot, which may eventually lead to the death of mankind!
How big can the negative impact of AI technology be?
How do governments around the world respond to the potential threat of AI?
Neural network is the foundation technology of ChatGPT
Fifty-one years ago, Geoffrey Hinton, who had not yet been called the “godfather of AI, ” entered the University of Edinburgh in Scotland as a graduate student and began research on artificial neural networks.
The so-called “artificial neural network ” is a mathematical model that mimics the structure and function of biological neural networks, especially the brain, and is able to learn skills by analyzing data.
This is the foundational technology behind OpenAI ChatGPT and Google Bard.
After Hinton resigned from Google, he did not have to worry about the harm his words would bring to Google, so he was interviewed by different media and said his heart: "AI may lead to the death of mankind." (Photo: University of Toronto official website)
In 2012, Hinton and his students, Ilya Sutskever and Alex Krishevsky, created a neural network system that analyzes thousands of photos and learns to recognize common things like flowers, dogs, cars, etc.
Subsequently, Hinton and two students founded DNNresearch, a startup based on this research project.
In 2013, Google acquired DNNresearch for US $44 million (approximately HK $343 million), and Hinton joined Google as Vice President and Engineering Researcher, responsible for some of the research work on Google Brain.
His protégé, Suzkville, left Google to co-found OpenAI with like-minded people, and became chief scientist, leading the research team to successfully develop the GPT model and ChatGPT.
Hinton ’ s top student, Suzkville, gave up his lucrative job at Google in 2015 to co-found OpenAI with Altman and others, and led the development of GPT and DALL-E models. (Image: University of Toronto website)
I regret working my whole life because I am worried about the dangers of AI.
In 2018, Hinton, along with University of Montreal professor Yoshua Bengio and Meta chief AI scientist Yann LeCun, won the A.M. Turing Award in recognition of their great contributions to neural networks and deep learning.
As a result, the three later became known as the “godfathers of AI ” or“ godfathers of deep learning. ”
Around the same time, Google and OpenAI began to build large-scale deep learning systems based on neural networks, which became the basis for future development of Bard and ChatGPT.
From this, it seems that Sinton plays an important role in creating the current glory of generative AI.
However, in the current era of AI, Sinton suddenly left Google in April 2023, shocking the entire AI industry.
Hinton explained that he left Google to talk freely about the potential risks of AI without harming Google.
Speaking about 50 years of research into neural networks, he said, “I ’ m very sorry about my life ’ s work. ”
The Internet will be filled with more and more fake AI-generated text, photos, and even videos, but the average person will not be able to tell the truth, Hinton said.
Moreover, sooner or later, AI technology will completely disrupt the job market, causing more and more jobs to disappear.
What is even more worrying is that at present, users can not only instruct ChatGPT to generate code, but also ask the AI to execute the code; in this way, the AI killer robots that often appear in science fiction movies will one day become a reality.
Is it not impossible for AI to destroy humanity?
Of course, this pessimistic future scenario is only a hypothetical one, but Hinton stressed that what could lead to it is already happening: a global race for AI technology has begun between Microsoft and Google, and even between China and the United States.
Most people think that the future of AI dominating everything is still far away, but he believes that AI may not take 30 to 50 years to control humans, and even find a way to kill humans, which may eventually lead to human extinction.
In the 1980s, Hinton was a professor of computer science at Carnegie Mellon University in the United States, but because he was not satisfied that the university's AI research was sponsored by the United States Department of Defense, he decided to leave the United States to teach at the University of Toronto's School of Computer Science.
He pointed out that without some kind of global regulatory agreement or regulatory mechanism, the AI arms race will intensify.
For this reason, Hinton believes that the threat posed by AI to humans may be more urgent than climate change, because the solution to climate change is obvious, as long as carbon emissions are reduced or carbon neutrality is achieved, but the current AI crisis does not know how to start. Although AI may pose an existential threat to humans, he does not agree to suspend AI research, because it can never erase the benefits and application value of AI.
Hinton believes it would be better to step up regulation of AI and make everyone aware of its potential harms.
OpenAI co-founder and CEO Sam Altman also acknowledged that ChatGPT has developed some reasoning capabilities that they can ’ t explain, and that it ’ s not entirely impossible for AI to destroy humans.
However, he said that he has installed a kill switch for ChatGPT, and if the development of ChatGPT exceeds human expectations, he will immediately press the switch to stop working.
OpenAI CEO Altman, known as the “father of ChatGPT, ” recently said he was“ a little scared ” about the potential of his children, and even admitted that there is a real possibility that AI will destroy humanity. (Image: Wikipedia)
Altman admits that ChatGPT ’ s influence in elections and the spread of disinformation is a concern, so the 2024 U.S. presidential election will be a focus for OpenAI.
(Image source: Pexels Gallery website)
The Curtain of Ignorance Makes AI Right Values
However, before we press the switch, we can try to instill the right values in AI, such as helping those most in need, not destroying humans. Google ’ s DeepMind paper published in April 2023 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggests that AI can be taught from the perspective of political philosopher John Rawls.
Rawls has proposed a concept called “The Veil of Ignorance ”, which aims to achieve the most equitable distribution of benefits when group decisions are made.
According to his book, The Debate, if a group of people stand behind a curtain, all of them will instantly lose their memory, become ignorant, and forget their identity and status in the real world.
The political philosopher Ross assumes that people are behind the “curtain of ignorance ” (left) and have no idea of their skills, identities, and status.
In this scenario, people tend to choose the most equitable distribution of rights for all. (Image: Wikipedia)
At this time, these people are asked to vote for a working principle for the society.
Because they do not know where they are in this society, they cannot make decisions in an egoistic way, and they can only judge according to the principle of fairness to all people.
The situation is like, at the birthday party, you are responsible for cutting the cake, because you do not know which piece you will get, so you will try to cut each piece to the same size.
Under the curtain of ignorance, fairness and justice that has nothing to do with personal interests will emerge.
For this reason, DeepMind believes that applying the “curtain of ignorance ” to AI training may help promote fairness in the process of“ aligning ” AI with human values.
By “alignment ”, it means aligning AI ’ s wishes with those of humanity.
If AI shares fair values with humans, AI will not have the intention to destroy humanity.
White House convenes tech giants to discuss AI threats
However, even if AI does not intend to destroy humans, it may still have many negative effects on human society.
The Center for Artificial Intelligence and Digital Policy (CAIDP), a U.S. technology ethics organization, has complained to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that OpenAI ’ s latest large language model, GPT-4, is biased and deceptive and poses a risk to privacy and public safety.
The CAIDP lists potential threats that may arise from GPT-4, including: helping hackers churn out malicious code to exacerbate cyberattacks; and biased AI training data that may reinforce social stereotypes and make people of all races and genders vulnerable to unfair treatment. The FTC is investigating OpenAI, said FTC Chairman Lina Khan. "They cannot be separated from existing legislation and the Federal Trade Commission will actively enforce them," he said.
In an effort to make GPT-4 more secure, OpenAI hired 50 experts and academics to test GPT-4 against lies, language manipulation, and dangerous scientific common sense.
The OpenAI headquarters is pictured here. (Image: Wikipedia)
In early May 2023, the White House invited Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, OpenAI founder Altman, and artificial intelligence startup Anthropic founder Dario Amodei to attend a conference to discuss the impact of AI on society.
Government officials at the meeting included Vice President Kamala Harris, Biden Chief of Staff Jeff Zients, National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, National Economic Council Chairman Lael Brainard, and Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo.
U.S. President Joe Biden also attended the meeting.
EU to pass world ’ s first AI regulatory law
Generative AI, while helping to improve lives, can also pose security, privacy and fraud issues, says Ms Ho.
She noted that AI companies have an ethical and legal responsibility to ensure the safety of their AI products, while at the same time working with governments to protect civil rights and privacy.
She stressed that the White House will work to advance potential new legislation and support new legislation to mitigate the potential harms of AI technology.
In contrast, Europe has taken a step ahead in AI legislation.
On 11 May 2023, the European Parliament ’ s Committee on Civil Liberties and Consumer Protection overwhelmingly approved a position paper calling for restrictions on the use of AI in Europe, a crucial first step towards the adoption of the world ’ s first AI regulation bill.
The draft bill will be submitted to the full European Parliament for a vote in June of the same year, after which representatives of the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission will work out the final terms of the bill in tripartite talks.
The European Parliament has adopted a position paper that strengthens restrictions on biometrics, facial recognition, and the use of AI by police in routine duties.
The parliament believes the move could lead to the world ’ s first AI regulation bill. (Image: Wikipedia)
On the other hand, the White House announced that Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, NVIDIA, Stability AI, Anthropic, and Hugging Face have all committed to participating in DEF CON 31, a computer security conference to be held in August 2023, so that their AI models will be tested and evaluated by hackers and AI experts.
Experts will try to identify errors, failures, and vulnerabilities in AI tools so that AI companies can solve existing problems in their models early on.
However, these AI companies simply agree to a one-time test, rather than a commitment to a continuous evaluation when launching or improving their products, and may therefore not be sufficient to meet the regulatory requirements.
Despite this, DEF CON 31 is still seen as the first step for an AI model to be publicly evaluated.
We hope that after each important first step in legislative regulation and public evaluation, we can put generative AI trains on the right track, so that everyone can safely benefit from technological innovation.
DEF CON is one of the largest computer security conferences in the world. In addition to cybersecurity experts and hackers, participants included staff from the FBI, the Department of Defense, and the Postal Inspection Service.
The conference covered areas such as software security, computer architecture, hardware modifications, and other vulnerable areas of information. (Image: DEF CON official website)
The content of the signed and / or unsigned articles published by Economic Times is the author's personal opinion and does not represent the position of Economic Times, and the role of Economic Times is to provide a free speech platform.
etnet won the HKEX Awards 2022 “Best Performing Securities Data Provider ” and“ Best Performing Derivative Data Provider ” ► Learn More
I want to respond
You may be interested
Enlarge display
I know. I know.
Featured Articles
• Life
• DIVA
• Healthy and good life

Title:

Content: The ‘Godfather of AI’ warns about potential dangers of the technology as he quits Google

British-Canadian computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton admits he has fears for the future of AI

In a Frankenstein-esque tale of maker and master, Geoffrey Hinton, 75, dubbed ‘the godfather of AI’, has left Google with a parting warning over the dangers of artificial intelligence.

In 2012, the British-Canadian computer scientist invented technology with two students at University of Toronto that would become the intellectual foundation for AI systems. Google purchased the rights to this neural network tech to the tune of $44 million, which also propelled Dr Hinton to receive the Turing Award in 2018, considered the Nobel Prize of computing.

Read More
The ultimate part-AI girl? One Tatler correspondent entrusts ChatGPT with her next assignment

ChatGPT’s the new It Girl in Town and now she’s got all the gossip, writes Dora Davies-Evitt in the April issue

Yet now, Dr Hinton has packed in the day job at Google to join a chorus of anxious experts demanding a rollback of AI research until more robust safety measures are designed and deployed. Dr Hinton told the BBC: ‘Right now, they’re not more intelligent than us, as far as I can tell. But I think they soon may be.’

While many look upon AI as a natural technological development akin to the internet that could lead to exciting breakthroughs for humanity, there are growing fears that AI is a Pandora’s box. Reflecting on the effects of his work, Dr Hinton said: ‘I console myself with the normal excuse: If I hadn’t done it, somebody would have,’ as he admitted, ‘it is hard to see how you can prevent the bad actors from using it for bad things.’

Read More
Cyber Society: Meet the NFT duo dominating the metaverse

Old Etonian digital artists Dominic Smith and Joe Carnell have caught the attention of Brooklyn Beckham, Steve Aoki and Jaden Smith

The scientist went on to warn that AI could be taught to ‘create sub-goals like “I need to get more power”’, and be harnessed by nefarious actors to wreak havoc. With innovation driven forward by the unstoppable competition between behemoths like Google and Microsoft, Dr Hinton warned innovation will only increase exponentially in the coming years.

There are those who are trying to apply the brakes to this runaway train. In March, an open letter was signed by over 1,000 tech leaders and researchers, including Elon Musk and fellow Turing Award winner Yoshu Bengio, calling for a six-month moratorium on AI development. A few days later, 19 leaders of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence released their own letter on the risks of AI. The signatures included that of Eric Horvitz, chief scientific officer at Microsoft.

The main outcry over AI lies in its ability to create and disseminate false news and images, which the public may find increasingly hard to identify. AI also poses a threat to academia and careers (see: Tatler’s foray into the world of ChatGPT). Dr Hinton believes that AI will fundamentally disrupt the workplace and take over the ‘drudge work’.

Read More
Lady Meta: my stratospheric rise through the metaverse

The Crypto Fashion Week debutante on becoming VR’s favourite It Girl

However Google’s chief scientist, Jeff Dean, offered words of comfort, adding: 'We remain committed to a responsible approach to AI. We’re continually learning to understand emerging risks while also innovating boldly.’

He spent about a decade at Google, including on Google Brain.

Title:

Content: Geoffrey Hinton, the godfather of AI, said after leaving Google that artificial intelligence is becoming smarter than humans.
2023 / 5 / 3 16: 46: 16 Source: IT House Author: Yuanyang Editor: Yuanyang
IT home May 3 news, one of the pioneers in the field of artificial intelligence, known as the "godfather of AI" Geoffrey Hinton (Geoffrey Hinton) recently announced that he has left the Google company he worked for ten years, because he is increasingly worried about the development of artificial intelligence technology.
In an interview with CNN's Jake Tapper today, he said that he believes artificial intelligence is becoming smarter than humans, and he wants to "blow the whistle" to remind people that they should seriously consider how to prevent artificial intelligence from controlling humans.
I'm just a scientist who suddenly realizes that these things are becoming smarter than we are, "Hinton said." I want to 'blow the whistle' in a way that says we should seriously worry about how to stop these things from taking control of us. "
Hinton was a pioneer in neural network technology, and his research laid the foundation for the artificial intelligence systems used in many products today.
IT House previously reported that he first revealed his departure in an interview with The New York Times on Monday and expressed his concerns about the potential harms of AI technology.
He said he was concerned that AI would lead to mass unemployment and create a world where many people “can ’ t know what ’ s real. ”
He also noted that the pace of advances in AI technology has far exceeded his and others ’ expectations.
If it becomes much smarter than us, it ’ s going to be very good at manipulating because it ’ s learned from us, and there are very few examples of a smarter thing being controlled by a dumber thing, ” Hinton told Tapper on Tuesday.
It will figure out ways to manipulate people into doing what it wants.
Hinton isn ’ t the only tech leader to express concerns about AI, and in March, a group of community members published a letter calling on AI labs to suspend training for at least six months on the most powerful AI systems, citing “profound risks to society and humanity. ”
Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, one of those who signed the letter, reiterated concerns about artificial intelligence spreading false information on “CNN Morning ” on Tuesday.“ Deception will become easier for those who want to cheat you. ” Wozniak told CNN, “We ’ re not making any changes in that — we ’ re just assuming that our existing laws will fix the problem. ” Wozniak also said there may be a need for“ some type ” of regulation.
Hinton said he did not sign the petition. “I don ’ t think we can stop this progress, ” he said.“ I didn ’ t sign the petition saying we should stop studying artificial intelligence, because if the Americans stop doing research, the Chinese won ’ t. ” But he admitted that he didn ’ t have a clear solution, “I don ’ t know if we can solve this problem. ”
I believe we should try to think about ways to solve the problem.
I don't have a solution at the moment. '
Related articles
Key word: artificial intelligence
Soft media 's website: IT home hot products - Value shopping guide, coupons most buy - rebate coupons iPhone home Win7 home Win10 home Win11 home
Soft media software: Cube cloud calendar cool point desktop Win7 optimization master Win10 optimization master soft media mobile APP application

Title:

Content: Hotspot
“The Godfather of AI ” Leaves Google to Talk About AI Risks for Life (13: 25)
AI pioneer Geoffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather of AI, ” confirmed on Monday that he had left Google for 10 years last week.
He said in an interview that the current development of AI chatbots is worrying, thinking that they will soon be smarter than humans, and that Russian President Vladimir Putin "such a bad person" will use AI to do bad things.
Hinton, 75, worked part-time at Google for 10 years, helping with AI development.
He said he left Google in the hope of being free to talk about the risks of AI without regard to the impact of speech on Google, but stressed that Google has taken very responsible action.
“I comfort myself that if I don ’ t do it, there are others who do the same work. ”
He admitted that he regretted his life's work, and said that AI chatbots are very scary, so far they have not been smarter than humans, but "soon it may be."
He also worried that "some people like Putin will use AI to do bad things."
Hinton added that AI is different from human intelligence, and AI learning is like one in 10,000 people learning something, others automatically learn it, so these chatbots gain more knowledge than any human.
Another worry, he said, is that AI will take people to work for humans, and at the same time create a world where “people no longer know what is true or false. ”
(CNN / BBC)
Related Words: United Sky Robotics Artificial Intelligence Editor 's Recommendation Hot HotPICK
Previous / Next News

Title:

Content: Beware of the nightmare of artificial intelligence.
The godfather of this software resigns from his position at Google
Conversation
The father of artificial intelligence Jeffrey Hinton [Archive] - Copyright Noah Berger / AP
By: Euronews
Hinton ’ s pioneering work on neural networks has shaped artificial intelligence systems that power many contemporary products.
He worked part-time at Google for a decade in the tech giant ’ s AI development efforts, but has since had concerns about the technology and its role in its development.
Geoffrey Hinton, who is considered the godfather of artificial intelligence, has resigned from his position at Google.
Warning about the growing risks of AI, Hinton stressed that “the downsides of this sector ’ s software like GPT are very frightening. ”
Hinton ’ s pioneering work on neural networks has shaped artificial intelligence systems that power many contemporary products.
He worked part-time at Google for a decade in the tech giant ’ s AI development efforts, but has since had concerns about the technology and its role in its development.
In a tweet on Monday, Hinton said he left Google so he could speak freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, not because of a desire to criticize Google specifically.
Hinton tweeted: “I left so I could talk about the dangers of artificial intelligence without thinking about how this would affect Google. ”
He added: “Google has acted with great responsibility. ”
Rapid development of artificial intelligence
In an interview with the BBC, Hinton said: "At the moment, these shows are not smarter than us, but I think they may soon be."
Hinton also considered that his age played into his decision to leave the tech giant Google, saying, “I ’ m 75 years old, so it ’ s time to retire. ”
Hinton ’ s groundbreaking research paved the way for access to current AI systems and is therefore considered by many to be the founder of the sector.
In another interview with The New York Times, Hinton said that “part of me regrets ” contributing to the development of the technology.
But the British-Canadian cognitive psychologist and computer scientist told the BBC: "Right now, what we're seeing is that things like ChatGT outperform a person in the amount of general knowledge they have and outperform them a lot.
But in terms of thinking, man is ahead. ”
However, he points out that "the speed at which this software evolves makes us expect its efficiency to improve, so we have to worry about that."
In an article in The New York Times, Hinton said there were “bad actors ” trying to use AI for“ bad things. ”
"Nightmare."
When asked by the BBC to elaborate on this, he replied: “This is just some sort of worst-case scenario, it ’ s a nightmare. ”
“You can imagine, for example, that some bad actors like Russian President Vladimir Putin decided to give robots the ability to set their own targets during the war. ”
“I have come to the conclusion that the kind of information we develop is very different from the intelligence we have.
We are biological systems and these are digital systems. ”
As for how the software learns, Hinton explained that it “works separately to instantly share its knowledge, as if you have 10,000 people and whenever someone learns something, everyone knows it automatically.
And so these chatbots can know far more than any one person. ”
Henton is not the first Google employee to raise a red flag on artificial intelligence.
In July, the company fired an engineer who claimed an undisclosed AI system had become conscious, saying it violated hiring and data security policies.
Additional Topics

In 2018 he received the A.M. Turing Award for advances in neural nets and deep learning.

Title:

Content: Geoffrey Hinton: GPT-4 is 100 times more knowledgeable than any human
Author: MIAO Yongqi
Published: Updated:
Computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton, known as the "godfather of artificial intelligence", announced Monday that he has resigned from Google. He has devoted his life to developing artificial intelligence systems, saying he "regrets his life's work" and is wary of the potential dangers of AI development.
In another recent interview, Hinton further talked about why he is afraid of AI development.
Hinton, 75, left Google a few days after the news broke in an interview with MIT Technology Review senior editor Will Douglas Heaven.
Hinton points out that the new generation of AI language models, especially the GPT-4, which came out in March, made him realize that these machines were moving in a direction that was much smarter than he thought, and he was afraid of these developments.
He is best known for a technique he proposed in the 1980s (with two colleagues) called backpropagation.
In short, the algorithms that allow machines to learn support almost all of today ’ s artificial neural networks, from computer vision systems to large language models.
It wasn ’ t until the 2010s that Hinton and his two recent graduates developed a “neural network ” that demonstrated its power, stronger than any computer ’ s ability to identify objects in images, and trained it to predict the next letter of a sentence, a precursor to today ’ s large-scale language patterns.
One of the students was Ilya Sutskever, the founder of OpenAI, who led the development of ChatGPT.
“We first thought it might be great. ”“ But it ’ s going to take a long time to realize that it needs to be done on a large scale to get good results. ”
In the 1980s, the discussion of “neural networks ” was considered a joke.
But Hinton doesn ’ t think so, and is working on this, software that mimics the abstract human brain and uses code as a connection between neurons. For 40 years, Hinton has viewed artificial neural networks as a clumsy attempt to mimic biological neural networks.
Now he thinks things have changed: he thinks there are better results when trying to mimic the behavior of the biological brain.
“It ’ s scary when you see it with your own eyes, ” he said.“ It ’ s a sudden change. ”
So why did ChatGPT surprise Hinton, too? He explained that the human brain has about 100 trillion connections, and “large language models have up to 500 billion, up to a trillion. ”
However, the knowledge of GPT-4 is a hundred times greater than that of any human.
So maybe it actually has a better learning algorithm than we do. "
He also pointed out that apart from the ability to learn, the ability to communicate is another kind of point.
“If you or I learn a new thing and want to teach it to another person, we can ’ t just send them a copy. ”
But artificial neural networks can do it.
It ’ s like there are 10,000 people here, and when one person learns a new thing, the other 9,999 people all learn it at the same time.
Hinton now believes that there are two types of intelligence: animal brains and artificial neural networks.
“It ’ s a completely different kind of intelligence.
“A new, better intelligence. ” Hinton believes that whether superintelligence is good or bad depends largely on whether you ’ re an optimist or a pessimist, and he says,“ mildly depressed, ” “that ’ s why I ’ m afraid. ”
“Whether these things are going to be smarter than us, I suddenly changed my mind. ”
I think they are very close to us now and they will be much smarter than us in the future, ” he said.
“How do we survive? ” he is particularly worried that people will use the tools he has developed to change the trajectory of human life, including elections and wars.
He said that he hopes to continue talking about AI security after leaving office and spend more time on “more philosophical work ”.“ As long as I ’ m still employed at Google, I can ’ t say what I want to say, ” he said. “I have a lot of good things to say about Google, and it would be more convincing if I wasn ’ t at Google. ”
Who is the godfather of AI computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton?
Hinton pioneered the basic technology of AI systems and became interested in artificial neural networks when he was a graduate student at the University of Edinburgh in 1972. In 2018, he and two experts in the field of deep learning were awarded the Turing Award, known as the “Nobel Prize in Computing ”.
What are the main concerns of “AI Godfather ” Geoffrey Hinton about the development of artificial intelligence?
He believes that the most direct impact is to promote the dissemination of false information and the loss of employment opportunities, and also worries about the use of this tool for evil, such as influencing elections and using it in war.

Title:

Content: AI Godfather Hinton: Artificial intelligence threatens humanity more urgently than climate change
Central News Agency
Geoffrey Hinton, a pioneer in artificial intelligence (AI), said in an interview with Reuters today that the threat posed by AI to humans may be “more urgent ” than climate change.
This is an advertisement, please continue reading.
Hinton, 75, who is regarded as one of the “godfathers ” of artificial intelligence, recently announced his departure from Alphabet, a 10-year tech company, because he wanted to make the risks of artificial intelligence public without involving employers.
Hinton ’ s research has been recognized as an important contribution to the development of contemporary AI systems. In 1986, he co-authored the influential paper Learning Representations by Back-propagating Errors, which set a milestone in the development of neural networks supporting AI technology. In 2018, he received the Turing Award for his research breakthroughs. And...
Hinton is one of a growing number of technology leaders who are concerned that machine intelligence will surpass humans and ultimately control the planet, and are openly raising concerns about the potential threat posed by AI.
“I ’ m not trying to downplay the importance of climate change, nor am I saying we shouldn ’ t worry about climate change, which is also a big risk, ” Hinton said.
But I think (artificial intelligence) may be more urgent in the end. "
“When it comes to climate change, making recommendations is simple: just stop carbon emissions.
If you do that, things will get better.
And when it comes to (artificial intelligence), there ’ s nothing we can do about it. ”
OpenAI, a U.S. artificial intelligence research lab sponsored by technology company Microsoft, launched ChatGPT, a chatbot that took the first shot at the AI race last November and quickly became the fastest-growing app in history, with 100 million monthly active users in just two months.
In April, thousands of people signed an open letter calling on all AI labs to suspend development of systems more powerful than OpenAI ’ s recently launched GPT-4 for at least six months, including social media CEO Elon Musk, AI pioneers Yoshua Bengio and Stuart Russell.
Hinton shares the concerns of the co-authors, who fear AI could pose an existential threat to humanity, but he disagrees with the suspension of research.
He said, “It ’ s not practical.
I agree that this is an existential risk, and it ’ s close, and it ’ s time to put a lot of effort into understanding what we can do. ”
Following the publication of the joint letter, the 12 members of the European Parliament called on leaders such as U.S. President Joe Biden and European Union Executive Committee Chairman Ursula von der Leyen to convene a summit to discuss how to control the development of advanced artificial intelligence systems such as ChatGPT, which are developing faster than expected.
“Technology leaders know best about [artificial intelligence], and politics must be involved, ” says Hinton.
This matter concerns all of us, so we must all think carefully. ”
This is an advertisement, please continue reading.

Which prestigious award did Hinton receive in 2018 for his work on neural networks?

Which prestigious award did Hinton receive in 2018 for his work on neural networks?

Which prestigious award did Hinton receive in 2018 for his work on neural networks?

Which prestigious award did Hinton receive in 2018 for his work on neural networks?

His work underpins systems like Bard and ChatGPT, which he says makes him uneasy.

Title:

Content: AI ’ s “godfather ” interviewed by the BBC, warning that artificial intelligence may be smarter than humans
AI ’ s “godfather ” interviewed by the BBC, warning that artificial intelligence may be smarter than humans
Geoffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather ” of artificial intelligence (AI), has resigned from Google.
He warned that developments in the field of artificial intelligence pose increasing dangers.
In a statement to The New York Times, Dr. Hinton said he regretted his current job.
Dr. Hinton ’ s pioneering research in neural networks and deep learning paves the way for current AI systems such as Google ’ s Bard chatbot and Microsoft ’ s ChatGPT.
The cognitive psychologist and computer scientist told the BBC that chatbots may soon be smarter than humans.

Title:

Content: Artificial intelligence: Geoffrey Hinton 'godfather' of modern technology resigns from Google and warns of its danger
Jeffrey Hinton, widely regarded as the spiritual father of artificial intelligence, has resigned, warning of the growing dangers of AI development.
Hinton, 75, announced his resignation from Google in a statement to the New York Times, saying he now regrets his work.
He told the BBC that some of the dangers of smart chatbots were "very scary".
“Right now, they ’ re not as smart as we can tell.
But I think they ’ ll be soon. ”
Hinton ’ s groundbreaking research on deep learning and neural networks has paved the way for artificial intelligence systems such as ChatGT.
But British-Canadian cognitive psychologist and computer science specialist Hinton told the BBC the chatbot could soon surpass the level of information held by the human brain.
Skip the podcast and keep reading.
Podcast
BBC Extra
A weekly podcast that presents humanitarian stories about the Arab world and its youth.
Loops
Podcast End
“Right now, what we ’ re seeing is that things like GPT-4 are far superior to a person in the amount of general knowledge they have.
For thinking, it ’ s not good, but it really works on simple thinking. ”
"Given the rate of development, we expect things to improve quickly.
So we have to worry about that. ”
In the article he sent to the New York Times, he pointed out that “bad actors ” may try to use artificial intelligence to do“ bad things. ”
In response to the BBC's request for further clarification on the matter, he said: "This is just kind of a worst-case scenario, kind of a nightmare scenario."
“Can you imagine, for example, that someone as bad as the Russian president (Vladimir Putin) decided to give robots the ability to create their own sub-goals? ”
In the end, he warned, this could “create sub-goals – for example, ‘ I need to get more power. ’ ”
"I have come to the conclusion that the kind of intelligence we develop is very different from the intelligence we have," he said.
“We are biological systems and these are digital systems.
The big difference is that with digital systems you have many copies of the same weight set, of the same world model. ”
"All of these versions can learn separately, but they share their knowledge immediately.
If you have 10,000 people, when one person learns something, everyone will automatically know it.
So chatbots can know much more than one person. ”
Hinton also spoke of several other reasons why he quit his job.
“One of them is that I am 75 years old now.
And the other is that I want to say good things about Google.
It would be more credible if I didn ’ t work for Google. ”
He stressed that he did not want to criticize Google, and that the company was "very responsible".
Google Chief Scientist Jeff Dean said: “We remain committed to a responsible approach to artificial intelligence.
We are constantly learning to understand the risks arising under innovation boldly as well. ”

Title:

Content: Wednesday, December 13, 2023
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

John Riopelle — obituary

Riopelle, John William It is with great sadness...

A.I. doesn’t bleed

by John Clinton, Ramsay New knowledge merges with...

Breakfast at the Legion, December 16

At the Almonte Legion Sat. December 16 Eggs to...
Science & NatureA.I. doesn't bleed

A.I. doesn’t bleed

by John Clinton, Ramsay

New knowledge merges with old; what you know shapes what you learn. Artificial neural networks have been studied and computer algorithms have been generated to understand how artificial, computer-generated, neurons, would store a concept, and how it would revise that concept if it was flawed.

Geoffrey Hinton, a computer scientist often called ‘the godfather of AI,’ is a leading figure in neural networks; studies inspired by the way neurons are connected in the human brain. A New Yorker magazine piece describes his collaborative work in the 1960s and 1970s developing neural nets that couldn’t do anything better than a child. The technology suddenly improved about a decade ago with the large increase in processing speed and Internet data availability.

According to Google Scholar, Hinton is the second most cited researcher among psychologists and the most cited among computer and cognitive scientists.

Hinton has been worried about the potential of AI to do harm and he often talks about the existential threat that AI might pose to the human species. He has used OpenAI’s ChatGPT and this has made him uneasy. He wrote “Fox News is an oxymoron” asking ChatGPT to explain the joke. (Initial reading of this caused me to ponder – a moron full of oxygen??) The first reply told him that this implied Fox News was fake news. When he called attention to the space between oxy and moron, it explained that Fox News was addictive, like the drug OxyContin. To him, this level of understanding represents a new era in AI.

In nature, wildlife learns how to be intelligent without access to concepts expressed in words. They learn to be smart (survive) through experience. Learning, not knowledge, is the engine of intelligence. There is no use trying to explain complicated ideas that you do not understand. First, you must understand how something works. Otherwise, you just produce nonsense.

Because neural networks are so strange, no one can predict how useful – or dangerous – AI will become. OpenAI’s GPT models involve billions of artificial neurons (data) which are profoundly different than biological brains. They are not alive. Our intuitions tell us that nothing resident in a browser tab could really be thinking in the way we do.

Because a human brain can run on oatmeal, the world can support billions of brains, all different. Each brain can learn continuously, rather than being trained once, then pushed out into the world (ship it!).

If the brain dies, the knowledge dies. If a computer dies, load up another computer. Ten thousand neural nets can learn ten thousand different things at the same time and share what they have learned. This immortality (knowledge perpetuity) and replicability suggest we should be concerned about digital intelligence taking over from biological intelligence.

Current AI technology is talkative and intellectual. The problems of physical intuition will be the challenge of the next decade says Yann LeCun, a French computer scientist. A teenager can learn to drive a car in twenty hours of practice with little supervision. AI systems don’t come close to doing this – except self-driving cars – and they are over-engineered, requiring the mapping of whole cities, hundreds of engineers, and hundreds of thousands of hours of training.

And then there is the problem of what some researchers call AI ‘hallucination’, which Hinton names ‘confabulation.’ AI systems confabulate by making up plausible answers to questions that stump them. In the human mind, there is no boundary between just making it up and telling the truth. Telling the truth is just making it up correctly. ChatGPT’s ability to make things up is a flaw, but also a sign of its humanlike intelligence.

When Hinton began his research, no one thought the technology would succeed. When it started to succeed, no one thought it would succeed so quickly. He expects AI will contribute to many fields, but he fears what will happen when powerful people abuse it. Think autonomous weapons. Hinton warns that even benign autonomous systems could wreak havoc. Yann LeCun has said there is an idea that if a system is intelligent it is going to want to dominate. But the desire to dominate has nothing to do with intelligence – it has to do with testosterone.

Recently, Hinton did not sign a popular petition that called for at least a six-month pause in AI research.

“China is not going to stop development for six months.”

“So what should we do?”

“I don’t know. If this were like climate change where we either must stop burning carbon or find a way to remove carbon from the atmosphere, we know what the solution looks like. Here, with AI, it’s not like that.”

Think of the AI story in which our intuitions about the specialness of the human mind are being dislodged by thinking machines, or, having stolen fire, we risk being burned.

Are we fooling ourselves, being taken in by our own machines and the companies that hope to profit from them? By seeking to re-create the knowledge systems in our heads, have we seized the forbidden apple? Have we risked exile from our charmed world? But who would choose not to know how knowing works?

Related

FOLLOW US

Latest

From the Archives

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

He left Google in 2023 to speak freely about AI risks.

Title:

Content: Sunday 13 August 2023
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Editors
Abdurrahim Ali
Editor-in-Chief
Dalia Abdul Rahim
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Editorial Board
Abdurrahim Ali
Editor-in-Chief
Dalia Abdul Rahim
In Arabic
Le Dialogue in Arabic
Angelique Bouchard writes: "Oppenheimer...
"Oppenheimer."
Is there another parallel world where we don't find Oppenheimer?
Follow the latest news through the app
With Oppenheimer ’ s biopic coming out on July 21, writer and director Christopher Nolan, known for his iconic films Interstellar and Inception, tackles the threat of thermonuclear war and human annihilation. Oppenheimer), in which visionary Nolan took the utmost care regarding artificial intelligence on the sidelines of a special Oppenheimer show in New York.
Origin of Legend
The film tells the story of Robert Oppenheimer, a charismatic physicist, played by Cillian Murphy, who was tasked with leading the Manhattan Project in Los Alamos, New Mexico, to build the atomic bomb during World War II.
Oppenheimer was hailed as a hero after the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings that ended the war against Japan in 1945, after Germany had already surrendered.
A few years later, in 1954, his security clearance was revoked during a poor hearing before Atomic Energy Commission advisers because of his close ties to the academic left at the University of California, Berkeley, among others — his girlfriend and brother, both members of the Communist Party — and his opposition to the creation of a hydrogen superbomb, encouraged by his colleague Edward Teller.
In fact, Hollywood is not afraid to oppose legends.
New York Times reporter Dennis Overby asks Nolan, “So Robert Oppenheimer is the most important person who ever lived? ”
Director Christopher Nolan thinks so and will surely be the man who will destroy the world.
“Who could be more important than him? ”
He could be the man who pushes the button that destroys the world.
But Nolan goes on to say, “You have to have a button to press.
I think it ’ s very easy to say that Oppenheimer is the most important person who ever lived because he was the one who facilitated the creation and manufacture of atomic weapons and even the hydrogen bomb and because he allowed Teller to work on them.
So he was the one who was able to bring the troops together effectively. ”
“Is there another parallel world where we don ’ t find Oppenheimer, but someone else? ”
It is possible, but it should not diminish its importance in history.
History was built not only from simple societal developments but by powerful individuals.
It ’ s a very philosophical discussion. ”
"Towards Oppenheimer's Moment"
On July 16, during a round table moderated by Chuck Todd, host of Meet the Press and attended by the director of the National Research Institute Los Alamos and some scientific and physical experts, Christopher Nolan insisted that individuals should take responsibility for the development of artificial intelligence.
He warns: “AI is about to reach Oppenheimer ’ s moment.
Over the past 15 years, more and more companies have used terms like algorithms, ignoring their true mathematical meaning.
“People in my industry who talk about algorithms don ’ t want to take responsibility for the consequences of what those algorithms produce. ”
“When applied to AI, this prospect is simply terrifying, ” he continues,“ not only because AI systems will serve defense infrastructures and possibly be responsible for the activation of nuclear weapons.
If we consider AI to be a separate entity from the person doing the activation and programming, then we are absolutely guilty, we need to hold people accountable for what they do with the tools they have. ”
On July 17, SAG-AFTRA staged a strike to join members of the second union, the WGA for the first time since 1980.
Stakeholders, unions and major studios remain at loggerheads over a dozen points, of which only a few have been made public.
According to the sources, the main sticking point is the majority union ’ s demand to collect 2% of the income generated by the flowing offers.
The question of AI and its impact on the practices and quality of work in the American film industry remains a major problem in the context of the many disputes between unions and major Hollywood studios.
SAG-AFTRA does not seek to ban AI from Hollywood but wants to ensure that any use of the artist / performer ’ s image must be accompanied by the necessary compensation and prior consent.
Is the devil hiding here in the details?
The unions assert that “this proposal was very skillfully formulated by studios whose flaws ordinary people are not aware of. ”
“This will allow studios to have absolute authorization to create profiles of performing artists using AI or to convert their uses for other purposes. ”
SAG-AFTRA wants to force syndicate approval on studios for any individual use of AI, which major studios have rejected at the negotiating table.
Christopher Nolan said: “With labor disputes in Hollywood right now, we can ’ t ignore the inherent drift in AI that when you innovate through technology, you have to maintain a high level of accountability. ”
Chuck Todd asks, “Do you think we ’ ll continue to revisit the Oppenheimer case as our understanding of quantum physics advances and as we tame the atom? ”
Nolan says, “I hope so. ”
“When I talk to top AI researchers, they literally refer to this moment — today — as their Oppenheimer moment.
They look to history to see the responsibilities of the scientists who develop these new technologies. ”
Todd goes on to ask, “Do you think Silicon Valley is questioning that right now? ”
“I ’ m not saying that Oppenheimer ’ s personal story provides easy answers to these fundamental questions, but a call to question the idea of individual and collective responsibility of people. ”
"The Regret of the Principal Sponsor of Artificial Intelligence"
Geoffroy Hinton, who helped create ChatGPT technology, fears that we are rushing into a danger similar to that described by Nolan.
Kidd Metz, a technology reporter for The New York Times, spoke with Amnesty International ’ s godfather on May 30, 2023, as the world began to experiment with the power of artificial intelligence.
The necessary discussion has emerged to reduce the risks.
And one of the most resonant warnings comes from a man who invented this technology.
Jeffrey Hinton said he quit his job at Google where he worked for more than 10 years and became one of the most respected voices.
He says these companies are incurring losses by encouraging robust product creation campaigns based on generated AI, the technology that powers popular chatbots like ChatGPT.
Hinton goes on to tell the New York Times that until last year, he thought Google had good technology management but that changed when Microsoft began integrating the chatbot into its search engine Bing and that the company began to voice concerns that threatened its research and development activities.
He told the BBC: "Some of the AI risks of chatbots are very scary."
He warned that they could outperform humans and be exploited by bad actors.
They can produce a lot of text automatically which makes spammers very effective.
“This will allow dictators to manipulate their constituents. ”
Hinton adds, “I have come to the conclusion that the kind of intelligence we develop is very different from the intelligence we have.
It ’ s like having 10,000 people and every time someone learns something and everyone knows it automatically.
This is how chatbot technology thrives and can learn far more than anyone else. ”
Nolan and Hinton are no doubt not the only ones in the advanced circles of AI research and Hollywood ’ s soft power who fear technological drifts.
Elon Musk said last month that he disagreed with Larry Page, co-founder of Google, because the latter did not take “the issue of AI security seriously enough.
Musk told Fox News that Page did not want to create “a digital superintelligence, but a digital god ” and“ as quickly as possible. ”
Journalists Josh Taylor and Alex Hearn point out in The Guardian, May 2, 2023 (AI pioneer Jeffrey Hinton has left Google and warned of the dangers of misinformation) that Mila ’ s general manager, the Quebec Institute for AI, Valerie Pisanu, has said that “neglect of AI systems security will not be tolerated in any other field. ”
“The technology is there and as the system interacts with humans, its developers wait to see what happens to make adjustments accordingly. ”
However, Mr. Hinton ’ s short-term concern relates to a phenomenon that has already become a reality: social media users, for example, are no longer able to discern the real thing, through photos and videos created in the AI that is flooding the internet.
According to Josh Taylor and Alex Hearn, “Recent improvements to image generators like Midjourney now allow the production of realistic images — like a picture of Pope Francis and a coat of Balenciaga that went viral last March. ”
Jeff Dean, Google ’ s chief science officer, said in a statement that Google appreciates Mr. Hinton ’ s contributions to the company over the past decade.
AI could end up replacing jobs such as paralegals, personal assistants and other “hard work ” in the future.
Information about the author:
Angelique Bouchard.
French journalist.
I have had a lot of interviews with a lot of French people.
He wrote about the film Oppenheimer.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

He warns AI may soon surpass human intelligence and become hard to control.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

He thinks this could come sooner than expected, threatening human existence.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

He estimates a 10% chance AI could cause human extinction.

Title:

Content: Report highlights the seriousness of artificial intelligence and warns of the threat of human extinction with a call for America to intervene
The world.
Publish
9 minutes read
(CNN) -- A new report commissioned by the State Department paints a worrying picture of the "catastrophic" national security risks posed by rapidly evolving artificial intelligence and warns the federal government is running out of time to avert disaster.
The findings were based on interviews with more than 200 people over more than a year, including senior executives from leading AI companies, cybersecurity researchers, weapons of mass destruction experts, and national security officials within the government.
The report, released this week by AI Gladstone, categorically suggests that more advanced AI systems could, in the worst case scenario, “pose an extinction-level threat to the human race. ”
The US State Department did not respond to a request for comment.
The warning in the report is another reminder that while the potential of AI continues to captivate investors and the public, there are real risks as well.
Jeremy Harris, CEO and co-founder of Gladstone AI, told CNN on Tuesday: “Artificial intelligence is already an economically transformative technology.
It can allow us to cure diseases, make scientific discoveries, and overcome challenges we once thought insurmountable. ”
"But it could also bring serious risks, including catastrophic risks, that we should be aware of."
“A growing body of evidence – including empirical research and analysis published at the world ’ s most important AI conferences – suggests that above a certain threshold of capability, AI systems are likely to become out of control. ”
White House spokeswoman Robin Patterson said President Joe Biden ’ s executive order on AI was “the most significant action any government in the world has taken to deliver on the promise and manage AI risk. ”
“The President and Vice President will continue to work with our international partners and urge Congress to pass bipartisan legislation to manage the risks associated with these emerging technologies, ” Paterson said.
A clear and urgent need to intervene
Researchers warn of two major dangers posed by large-scale artificial intelligence.
First, Gladstone AI said the most advanced AI systems could be armed to cause irreparable damage.
Second, there are particular concerns within AI labs that they may at some point “lose control ” over the very systems they are developing, with“ potentially devastating consequences for global security. ”
"The rise of artificial intelligence and artificial general intelligence has the potential to destabilize global security in ways reminiscent of the introduction of nuclear weapons," the report said, adding that there is a risk of an AI "arms race", conflict and "deadly accidents the size of weapons of mass destruction."
The Gladstone AI report calls for radical new steps aimed at countering this threat, including the launch of a new AI agency, the imposition of “emergency ” regulatory safeguards and restrictions on how much computer power can be used to train AI models.
The authors wrote in the report: "There is a clear and urgent need for the intervention of the United States government."
The report notes that although the work was produced for the State Department, its views “do not reflect the views ” of the agency or the U.S. government in general.
A government notice issued in 2022 by the State Department ’ s Nonproliferation and Disarmament Fund Office shows that the government is offering to pay up to $250,000 for an assessment of “proliferation and security risks ” associated with advanced AI.
Safety Concerns
Harris, Gladstone ’ s executive director of artificial intelligence, said his team ’ s “unprecedented level of access ” to public and private officials had led to startling conclusions.
Gladstone AI said it spoke to technical and leadership teams from chat owner OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Facebook parent company Meta and Anthropic.
In a video posted on Gladstone AI ’ s website announcing the report, Harris said: “Along the way, we ’ ve learned some disturbing things.
Behind the scenes, the safety and security situation in advanced AI seems largely inadequate compared to the national security risks that AI may soon pose somewhat. ”
The Gladstone AI report said competitive pressures were driving companies to accelerate AI development “at the expense of safety and security, ” increasing the likelihood that more advanced AI systems would be“ stolen ” and “weaponized ” against the United States.
The findings add to a growing list of warnings about the existential risks posed by AI — including from even some of the industry ’ s most powerful figures.
Nearly a year ago, Jeffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” quit his job at Google and sounded the alarm about the technology he helped develop.
Hinton said there is a 10% chance that artificial intelligence will lead to human extinction within the next three decades.
Hinton and dozens of AI industry leaders, academics and others signed a statement in June saying that “mitigating the extinction risk of AI must be a global priority. ”
Business leaders are increasingly concerned about these risks – even as they invest billions of dollars in AI.
Last year, 42% of CEOs surveyed at last year ’ s Yale CEO Summit said AI has the potential to destroy humanity five to ten years from now.
abilities similar to human abilities to learn.
Gladstone AI in its report pointed to some prominent individuals who have warned about the existential risks posed by artificial intelligence, including Elon Musk, Federal Trade Commission Chairman Lena Khan, and a former senior executive at OpenAI.
Some employees at AI companies share similar concerns privately, according to Gladstone AI.
“An individual at one of the well-known AI labs expressed the view that if a specific next-generation model of AI were launched without access restrictions, it would be ‘ very bad ’, because the model ’ s potentially convincing ability could ‘ break democracy ’ if leveraged in areas such as election interference or voter manipulation, ” the report said.
Gladstone said she had asked AI experts in some labs to share their personal estimates privately about the likelihood that an AI incident could lead to “irreversible global effects ” in 2024.
Estimates ranged from 4 percent to as much as 20 percent, according to the report, which notes that the estimates were informal and likely to be heavily biased.
One of the biggest surprises is how quickly artificial intelligence is evolving — specifically artificial general intelligence (AGI), a hypothetical form of artificial intelligence that has a human-like or even superhuman learning ability.
The report says AI is seen as “the main driver of catastrophic risks caused by loss of control, ” and notes that OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Anthropic, and Nvidia have all publicly stated access to AI by 2028 — though others believe it ’ s far beyond.
Gladstone AI points out that disagreements over AI timelines make it difficult to develop policies and safeguards, and there is a risk of a slowdown in regulation as technology evolves.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

He urges regulation and government action, as progress is outpacing safety.

Title:

Content: My channel
* Drag categories can be customized sorting
Recover Default OK
Setup
Alert
The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on five Supreme Court ethics concerns.
New York City Council Protests to Abolish 24-hour Work
The godfather of AI leaves Google worried that artificial intelligence will fall into the wrong hands
The US media reported today that Hinton, known as the “godfather of AI ”, resigned his job at Google and openly talked about the risks of AI, worried that AI would fall into the wrong hands.
He says it ’ s hard to see how to prevent bad people from using it to do bad things.
Geoffrey Hinton, who laid the groundwork for artificial intelligence (AI) systems, told The New York Times that advances in AI pose “great risks to society and humanity. ”
In a report published today in The New York Times, Hinton was quoted as saying, “Look at how it looked five years ago and now, the difference and growth, it ’ s really scary. ”
Hinton pointed out that competition among tech giants is driving these companies to release new AI technologies at a dangerous rate, which will endanger people ’ s jobs and spread misinformation.
"It's hard to see how you can prevent bad people from using AI to do bad things," he told the New York Times.
OpenAI, the startup behind Google and now the most powerful AI chatbot, ChatGPT, began developing systems with more data than ever before in 2022.
Hinton told the New York Times that he believes these systems are surpassing human intelligence in some ways because of the sheer volume of data they analyze.
"Perhaps these systems are already more powerful than the human brain," he said.
While AI has been used to support human needs for work, the rapid development of chatbots like ChatGPT could leave human jobs in jeopardy.
He told the New York Times that AI was “taking on a chore, ” but that“ it ’ s probably going to do more than that. ”
Hinton also warned that AI could spread the wrong message, telling the New York Times that the average person would “never know what ’ s true again. ”
According to the New York Times, Hinton submitted his resignation to Google last month.
Google ’ s head of AI, Jeff Dean, expressed his gratitude to Hinton in a statement to the US media.
“As one of the first companies to publish AI principles, we remain committed to taking a responsible approach to AI, ” the statement added.
“While we innovate boldly, we are constantly discovering new risks. ”
Tech billionaire Elon Musk and many experts have called for a pause in the development of AI systems to allow time to ensure the technology is safe.
After the introduction of GPT-4, which is more powerful than the AI used by ChatGPT, Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak signed an open letter.
Hinton, who was not involved in the petition, told the New York Times that scientists should not “further scale research and development ” until they understood if they could control AI.
The New York Times Google
The last one.
The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on five Supreme Court ethics concerns.
The next one.
Equal request?
US asks Chinese airlines not to fly over Russian airspace
Extended reading
Super-popular
More >

Title:

Content: Information Technology
The father of artificial intelligence urges governments to face its risks before disaster
Jeffrey Hinton, described as the father of artificial intelligence, on Wednesday urged governments to intervene to ensure that machines do not control society.
Hinton made headlines in May when he announced his resignation from Google to speak more freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, shortly after the launch of ChatGPT, which captivated the world.
The artificial intelligence scientist, who is studying at the University of Toronto, spoke to a crowd at the Collagen Technology Conference in the Canadian city.
The conference attracted more than 30,000 startup founders, investors and tech workers, most of whom were eager to learn how to ride the wave of artificial intelligence rather than hear lessons about its risks or calls for governments to intervene.
“Before AI becomes smarter than us, I think the people who develop it should be encouraged to put a lot of effort into understanding how it can try to take control of us, ” Hinton said.
“Now there are 99 highly intelligent people trying to make AI better, and one very intelligent person trying to figure out how to stop it from taking control, and maybe we should be more balanced. ”
Hinton warned that the dangers of artificial intelligence must be taken seriously.
“I think it ’ s important for people to understand that this is not science fiction or just fear, ” he said, adding:“ It ’ s a real risk that we have to think about, and we have to figure out how to deal with it first. ”
Hinton expressed concern that AI would deepen inequality, as the vast gains from its productivity would go to the rich, not the workers.
“Wealth will not go to the people who work, it will make the rich richer, not the poor, and this is a very bad society, ” he said.
He also pointed to the danger of “fake news ” that can be created by robots such as ChatGPT, hoping to mark the content generated by artificial intelligence programs as central banks mark coins.
He stressed that it is important to “try, for example, to distinguish everything that is fake as fake, ” and said,“ I don ’ t know if we can do it technically or not. ”
“The Island Net ”

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

He cites risks of misuse, misinformation, reinforced bias, and job disruption.

Title:

Content: Global News
The world today - the "godfather" of artificial intelligence reveals why he left Google
You are now following the news of the "godfather" of artificial intelligence reveals the reason for his departure from "Google" from the Department of World News and now we leave you with the full details
MOHAMMED, Abu Dhabi, May 2, 2023 06: 22 AM - Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed "the father of artificial intelligence", revealed on Monday that he quit his job at Google last week, in order to speak publicly about the "dangers" of the technology he helped develop.
Hinton ’ s work on neural networks has shaped artificial intelligence systems that power many of today ’ s technology products.
Hinton, who worked part-time at Google for a decade, contributed to the tech giant ’ s AI development efforts, but has since had concerns about the technology and its role in its development.
In an interview with The New York Times, Hinton said, “I consolate myself with the common excuse: if I hadn ’ t done it, someone else would have done it. ”
Hinton attributed his decision to leave Google to his desire to speak freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, not to criticize the company, as he tweeted on Monday.
Google ’ s chief scientist, Jeff Dean, commented on Hinton ’ s decision: “He has made major breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, ” expressing appreciation for“ a decade of contributions to Google. ”
In a statement to CNN, Dean said: “We remain committed to a responsible approach to artificial intelligence.
We are constantly learning to understand emerging risks while boldly innovating. ”
Hinton ’ s decision to want to expose his concerns about artificial intelligence came as a growing number of lawmakers and groups raised warnings about the possibility of a new set of chatbots spreading fake information and eliminating a slew of jobs.
Hinton is not the first Google employee to alert to the dangers of artificial intelligence: in July, the company fired an engineer who claimed that an undisclosed intelligence system had become conscious, while many in the technical field strongly refused to confirm what the engineer said.
We hope that we have succeeded in conveying the full details of the news of the "spiritual father" of artificial intelligence reveals the reason for his departure from Google..
In God ’ s care and protection.
You may also read.

Title:

Content: Warnings about the dangers of artificial intelligence
Message Net- Agencies
The UK Parliament ’ s Science, Innovation and Technology Committee has warned of the potential threat artificial intelligence poses to human lives.
The committee demanded that the risks of artificial intelligence be the focus of any future government regulation and that controls be put in place for the use of this technology, according to the British network "Sky News".
Members of the UK Parliament ’ s Science and Technology Committee have called on Prime Minister Rishi Sonak to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence ahead of the UK hosting the world ’ s first global summit on artificial intelligence.
The committee identified 12 challenges posed by artificial intelligence, noting the need to address these challenges during the summit and reach a common approach among countries to reduce the risks of modern technology.
According to the committee, the threats included:
An existential threat.
The committee recalls that some experts have warned of the significant threat to human life posed by artificial intelligence, so it is necessary to enact regulations that provide protection for national security.
Bias
The British Commission believes that artificial intelligence can reinforce existing biases in society or introduce new biases.
Privacy Policy
Sensitive information belonging to individuals or companies can be used to train AI models.
Misrepresentation.
The panel warned that ChatGPT models could produce distorted material about a person ’ s behavior and personal views.
DATA
The committee said training the most powerful AI tools would require a huge amount of data.
Computing power
According to committee members, developing the most powerful AI tools requires enormous computing power.
Transparency
AI models struggle to explain why they broadcast a particular result, or where they come from information.
PROPERTY RIGHTS
Generative models, whether text, images, audio or video, typically make use of existing content, which must be protected so as not to undermine the creative industries, the committee said.
Responsibility
If AI tools are used to harm, the policy should determine whether developers or service providers are responsible or not, according to the committee.
JOBS
The UK Science and Technology Commission has asked politicians to anticipate the potential impact that the adoption of AI will have on existing jobs.
Openness
She called for the computer code behind AI models to be made openly available, to allow for more reliable regulation and to promote transparency and innovation.
International coordination
The Committee stressed that the development of any organization must be an international task, and the November summit should welcome as many participating countries as possible.
In June, British Prime Minister Rishi Sonak announced during a visit to Washington that London would host the first global AI summit this year.
Sonak said countries should ensure that the development and use of artificial intelligence is done in a safe way, especially as it has amazing potential that can change lives for the better.
The Secretary-General of the United Nations, António Guterres, has called for the establishment of controls rooted in human rights, transparency and accountability, in the development and use of artificial intelligence for the common good.
Guterres stressed the urgent need to reach consensus on what the guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence should be.
In May, AI pioneer Geoffrey Hinton spoke about the dangers of artificial intelligence following his resignation from tech giant Google.
Hinton said in an interview with The New York Times that the goal of his resignation was to speak freely about generative artificial intelligence and its underlying risks.
He said there were fears that the machine would overtake its maker as competition between major technology giants has led to progress that no one could imagine, and the speed at which progress is happening has exceeded scientists' expectations.
Hinton said he feared the technology could significantly disrupt the job market, as it could eliminate many jobs.
The technology expert added that the progress in artificial intelligence technology is very fast, compared to the means available to regulate its use, where future versions could become "threats to humanity".

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

He notes AI can learn and share knowledge rapidly if not controlled.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

He has expressed regret for his contributions as risks became clearer.

Title:

Content: World's first protection against AI is approved by all 193 UN nations that will ban malicious designs and development of the tech - and Russia and China co-sponsored the new resolution

  • The UN is setting new guardrails against AI to protect data and human rights
  • The resolution was signed by all 193 UN members and 123 non-UN countries
  • Tech titans have expressed growing concerns about the development of AI
  • The 'Godfather of AI' has said he regrets developing the technology
  • READ MORE: AI poses 'extinction-level' threat and government must control it

Artificial intelligence has stoked fears and security concerns for years but a new global resolution to safeguard the public may provide much-needed reassurance.

The United Nations General Assembly approved a resolution to shield personal data, monitor AI for potential risks including scams, and protect human rights.

The resolution - proposed by the US - is non-binding but was agreed upon by all 193 UN member nations and co-sponsored by non-members from 123 countries, including China and Russia.

The resolution comes as high-profile tech moguls have expressed concerns about AI's reliability, including Geoffrey Hinton - the 'Godfather of AI' - who said last year that he regretted creating the technology and worries that machines could take over.

All 193 UN members signed an AI resolution to protect people's data and human rights

The White House called the resolution a 'historic step' and Vice President Kamala Harris said she and President Joe Biden are committed to establishing AI safeguards

The White House praised the resolution, calling it a 'historic step' to ensuring 'trustworthy' advancements in AI.

National security adviser Jake Sullivan wrote in a statement: 'The resolution adopted today lays out a comprehensive vision for how countries should respond to the opportunities and challenges of AI.

'It lays out a path for international cooperation on AI, including to promote equitable access, take steps to manage the risks of AI, protect privacy, guarding against misuse, prevent exacerbated bias and discrimination.'

It took three months for the countries to finalize negotiations and agree on global privacy policies to ensure the AI technology benefits all nations and is 'safe, secure and trustworthy.'

The resolution noted the nations needed to agree on AI's 'design, development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence systems' is accelerating.

'We're sailing in choppy waters with the fast-changing technology, which means that it's more important than ever to steer by the light of our values,' a senior UN administration official said, and added that this resolution is the 'first-ever truly global consensus document on AI.'

This resolution aims to close the gaps in the technological divide between Western countries and poorer, third-world countries to make sure their technology is advanced enough to benefit from AI.

'The improper or malicious design, development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence systems ... pose risks that could ... undercut the protection, promotion and enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms,' the resolution stated.

Scammers have used AI to steal people's data and money and have been used to impersonate family members on the phone - leading their relatives to believe they're in trouble and need money immediately before scamming them out of thousands of dollars.

AI has been used to make deepfake videos and pictures of people without their knowledge or consent

AI has also been used to create deepfake photos and videos of celebrities and average people, and because much of the violations are done through complex algorithms, it can be difficult to hold actors accountable for any harm caused.

'Now is the time to not only ensure that AI systems are rights respecting by design, but also to guarantee that those who are impacted by these technologies are not only meaningfully involved in decision-making on how AI technology should be regulated, but also that their experiences are continually surfaced and are centered within these discussions,' Amnesty International reported.

READ MORE: AI-generated voice calls are made ILLEGAL in US - and FCC says ruling 'takes effect immediately'

Following the new ruling, FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel said, 'We're putting the fraudsters behind these robocalls on notice.'

Advertisement

The agreement between all UN members and the support from other countries was a major development.

UN members said that there were 'lots of heated conversations. ... But we actively engaged with China, Russia, Cuba, other countries that often don't see eye to eye with us on issues.'

According to the resolution, all participating countries will ensure it is adopted and developed in a secure way that prevents the systems from exposing people's data and will make sure all nations can enjoy the benefits.

Vice President Kamala Harris, the US's AI Czar, said in a statement that the White House welcomes the UN's adoption of the resolution.

She continued: 'President Biden and I are committed to establishing and strengthening international rules and norms on emerging technology – because technology with global impact, such as AI, requires global action, and when it comes to the challenges of the 21st century, we believe all nations must be guided by a common set of understandings.'

The resolution comes after AI faced scrutiny from top tech executives who have painted a 'world-on-fire' scenario, with many warning that AI machines could take over, leading to an 'extinction level' event.

Tech titans penned a letter in March 2023 urging lawmakers to force companies to pause their AI software developments.

'Recent months have seen AI labs locked in an out-of-control race to develop and deploy ever more powerful digital minds that no one – not even their creators – can understand, predict, or reliably control,' said the letter which was signed by more than 1,000 tech developers and experts.

Among those who signed the letter were X owner Elon Musk and OpenAI ChatGPT founder Sam Altman.

Hinton also foretold what steps the technology could take to get out of control and cause human extinction.

'One of the ways these systems might escape control is by writing their own computer code to modify themselves. And that's something we need to seriously worry about,' Hinton told CNBC last year.

The AI godfather has even gone so far as to say he regrets building the technology but told The New York Times: 'I console myself with the normal excuse: If I hadn't done it, somebody else would have.'

He did not sign the pause petition, instead urging political involvement and oversight.

Elon Musk and Steve Wozniak have urged caution or a moratorium on advanced AI.

What did the open letter signed by thousands, including Elon Musk, call for in response to AI risks highlighted by Hinton?

Six-month pause on AI systems more powerful than GPT-4

What did the open letter signed by thousands, including Elon Musk, call for in response to AI risks highlighted by Hinton?

Six-month pause on AI systems more powerful than GPT-4

What did the open letter signed by thousands, including Elon Musk, call for in response to AI risks highlighted by Hinton?

Six-month pause on AI systems more powerful than GPT-4

The UN Secretary-General and UK Prime Minister call for international coordination.

Title:

Content: Presented By
Guido Mieth—Getty Images
Ideas
Otto Barten is director of the Existential Risk Observatory, a nonprofit aiming to reduce existential risk by informing the public debate.
Joep Meindertsma is founder of PauseAI, a movement campaigning for an AI Pause.

The existential risks posed by artificial intelligence (AI) are now widely recognized.

After hundreds of industry and science leaders warned that “mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war,” the U.N. Secretary-General recently echoed their concern. So did the prime minister of the U.K., who is also investing 100 million pounds into AI safety research that is mostly meant to prevent existential risk. Other leaders are likely to follow in recognizing AI’s ultimate threat.

In the scientific field of existential risk, which studies the most likely causes of human extinction, AI is consistently ranked at the top of the list. In The Precipice, a book by Oxford existential risk researcher Toby Ord that aims to quantify human extinction risks, the likeliness of AI leading to human extinction exceeds that of climate change, pandemics, asteroid strikes, supervolcanoes, and nuclear war combined. One would expect that even for severe global problems, the risk that they lead to full human extinction is relatively small, and this is indeed true for most of the above risks. AI, however, may cause human extinction if only a few conditions are met. Among them is human-level AI, defined as an AI that can perform a broad range of cognitive tasks at least as well as we can. Studies outlining these ideas were previously known, but new AI breakthroughs have underlined their urgency: AI may be getting close to human level already.

Recursive self-improvement is one of the reasons why existential-risk academics think human-level AI is so dangerous. Because human-level AI could do almost all tasks at our level, and since doing AI research is one of those tasks, advanced AI should therefore be able to improve the state of AI. Constantly improving AI would create a positive feedback loop with no scientifically established limits: an intelligence explosion. The endpoint of this intelligence explosion could be a superintelligence: a godlike AI that outsmarts us the way humans often outsmart insects. We would be no match for it.

More from TIME

A godlike, superintelligent AI

A superintelligent AI could therefore likely execute any goal it is given. Such a goal would be initially introduced by humans, but might come from a malicious actor, or not have been thought through carefully, or might get corrupted during training or deployment. If the resulting goal conflicts with what is in the best interest of humanity, a superintelligence would aim to execute it regardless. To do so, it could first hack large parts of the internet and then use any hardware connected to it. Or it could use its intelligence to construct narratives that are extremely convincing to us. Combined with hacked access to our social media timelines, it could create a fake reality on a massive scale. As Yuval Harari recently put it: “If we are not careful, we might be trapped behind a curtain of illusions, which we could not tear away—or even realise is there.” As a third option, after either legally making money or hacking our financial system, a superintelligence could simply pay us to perform any actions it needs from us. And these are just some of the strategies a superintelligent AI could use in order to achieve its goals. There are likely many more. Like playing chess against grandmaster Magnus Carlsen, we cannot predict the moves he will play, but we can predict the outcome: we lose.

But why would a superintelligence want to make humanity extinct? In fact, it might not explicitly want that at all. Humanity’s extinction might be a mere side effect of executing another goal to its extremity. When we are executing our own goals as humans, such as food production or growing our economy, we tend to not pay much attention to the effects this has on other species. This routinely leads to the extinction of animal species as a mere side effect of us maximising our goals. In a similar fashion, an uncontrollable superintelligence could lead to our extinction as a side effect of the AI pushing its goals, whatever they may be, to their limits.

Read More: The A to Z of Artificial Intelligence

So how can we avoid AI existential risk? Humanity now faces a stark choice: pause AI at a safe level, or continue development indefinitely. Unsurprisingly, the AI labs want the latter. To continue, however, means literally betting our lives on these labs being able to solve an open scientific problem called AI Alignment.

AI Alignment is the approach that leading labs such as OpenAI, DeepMind, and Anthropic are currently taking to prevent human extinction. AI Alignment does not attempt to control how powerful an AI gets, does not attempt to control what exactly the AI will be doing, and does not even necessarily attempt to prevent a potential takeover from happening. Since the labs anticipate they will not be able to control the superintelligent AI that they are creating, they accept that such an AI will act autonomously and unstoppably, but aim to make it act according to our values. As Richard Ngo, a leading alignment researcher working at OpenAI, puts it, “I doubt we’ll be able to make every single deployment environment secure against the full intellectual powers of a superintelligent AGI.” There are large problems with their alignment approach, however, both fundamentally and technically.

What values should an AI have?

Fundamentally, there is of course no agreement on what values we have. What OpenAI founder Sam Altman wants a superintelligence to do may well be completely different from what, say, a textile worker in Bangladesh wants it to do. Aggregating human preferences has always been a thorny issue even before AI, but will get even more complicated when we have a superintelligence around that might be able to quickly, completely, and globally implement the wishes of a handful of CEOs. Democracy, however imperfect, has been the best solution we can find for value aggregation so far. It is, however, unclear whether our current combination of national political systems can control a godlike AI. In fact, it is unclear whether any organisation or system would be up to the task.

Beyond disagreement over current values, humans have historically not been very good at predicting the future externalities of new technologies. The climate crisis, for one, can be seen as an unforeseen outcome of technologies such as steam and internal combustion engines. Ever more powerful technology has the potential to create ever larger externalities. It is impossible to foresee what the negative side effects will be of actually implementing some interpretation of humanity’s current values. They might make climate change pale in comparison.

There are more unsolved fundamental issues with aligning a superintelligence, but currently, AI companies don’t even get that far. It seems that even making current large neural networks reliably do what anyone wants is a technical problem that we currently cannot solve. This is called inner misalignment and has been observed already in current AI: the model pursues the wrong goal when it is released into the real world after being trained on a limited dataset. For a superintelligence, this could have a catastrophic outcome. This problem is, according to OpenAI’s recent document Governance of Superintelligence, an “open research question.” But not to worry: they say they are “putting a lot of effort” into it.

Read More: The AI Arms Race is Changing Everything

Even if individuals such as Altman care about the existential threats of superintelligence, the current market dynamics of competing AI labs do not incentivize safety. The GPT-4 model built by OpenAI was tested and fine-tuned for seven months before being made public with a detailed report about its safety. Contrary to the safety efforts of OpenAI, a panicked Google released its competing PaLM 2 model just months later, without any mention of similar safety tests. Now even open-source models like Orca are performing at a ChatGPT level, without any safety analysis. The race is frantic, pushing these companies to take more risks to stay ahead. The scope of these risks is gigantic. As Jaan Tallinn, investor of the major AI lab Anthropic, puts it: “I’ve not met anyone in AI labs who says the risk [from training a next-generation model] is less than 1% of blowing up the planet”.

Let us be clear: continuing risky AI development, and eventually undergoing the intelligence explosion that leads to an uncontrollable superintelligence, is a terrible idea. We will not be able to navigate it safely. We lack the technical solutions, the coordination, the insight, the wisdom, and the experience to do something this complex right on the first try. As humans, we are good at solving problems with trial-and-error processes where we get lots of tries. But in the case of an intelligence explosion, we cannot use this strategy, since the first trial of uncontrolled superintelligence could be disastrous.

Why we should pause AI development

So what is the alternative? An AI Pause. This would mean that governments prohibit training any AI model with capabilities likely to exceed GPT-4. This can be determined by examining the amount of computation required for training, corrected over time for improvements in algorithmic efficiency. These leading models can only be trained at large AI companies or data centers, making the enforcement of such a pause realistic.

Since the leading labs are currently located in the U.S. and the U.K., implementing a pause at a national level in those two countries can be done on very short notice. In the medium term, the competitive dynamics between nations will require international legislation and collaboration, where an international AI agency would help. The U.K. is already planning to host an AI safety summit in autumn, which is a fitting moment to sign a treaty that implements an international AI Pause. Excluding important countries, especially China, from such a summit might not be wise, since they will be needed as well in the medium term. For the longer term, hardware regulation—such as making sure new consumer hardware cannot be used for large-scale AI training, while closely monitoring all hardware that can be—is a promising option to practically enforce a pause. Research into this topic needs to be scaled up rapidly to arrive at robust and implementable solutions.

Further AI development may continue only after regulating authorities are convinced that training and deploying a certain AI model will not risk an uncontrolled intelligence explosion or a takeover scenario. Second-order effects, such as making hard-to-control open-source development easier, should be taken into account in such decisions.

Read More: What to Know About Claude 2, Anthropic’s Rival to ChatGPT

Continuing beyond the red line, and thus risking an intelligence explosion or a takeover, should only be allowed after meeting the strictest of requirements. First of all, the technical alignment problem should be decisively solved. Other major issues, such as aggregating humanity’s different value systems, limiting unforeseen externalities, and many more, will also need to be addressed.

A pause may be seen by some as unrealistic. They might say that we cannot stop technological progress for a speculative scenario, that market forces are too strong to counter, or that opposing countries can never coordinate. But bear in mind that as a society, we have barely begun to let the truth sink in: we are risking human extinction here. AI existential risk is still not taken as seriously as it should be. But that is changing. Leading AI academics, such as ‘fathers of AI’ Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio, have sounded public warnings about AI’s existential risk, because they saw the technology getting more capable. This process is unlikely to stop: AI’s capabilities will grow further, and this will lead to more and more debate leaders sounding the alarm bells. When the full weight of our situation sinks in, measures that may appear unrealistic at present, could rapidly gain support.

As humanity, we will realise the situation that we are in. We will come together, and we will find a solution, as we always have. And, sooner than we think, we will implement an AI Pause.

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com.

You May Also Like
EDIT POST

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns: he will control us and governments to confront him
2023-06-29T07: 41: 01.000000Z
Jeffrey Hinton, described as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” on Thursday called on governments to confront the dangers of this type of intelligence and intervene to ensure that machines do not control society.
The warnings come at a time when "artificial intelligence" is rapidly evolving, which has raised concerns about its impact on many human jobs.
Hinton made headlines in May 2023 when he announced his resignation from Google to speak more freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, shortly after the launch of the chatbot that captivated the world.
The artificial intelligence scientist, who teaches at the University of Toronto, spoke to a crowd at the Collegion Technology Conference in the Canadian city, according to Agence France-Presse.
The conference attracted more than 30,000 startup founders, investors and tech professionals, most of whom were looking to learn how to ride the wave of AI rather than hear lessons about its risks or calls for governments to intervene.
Hinton said that “before AI becomes smarter than us, I think the people who develop it should be encouraged to do a lot of work to understand how it can try to take control of us. ”
“Now there are 99 highly intelligent people trying to make AI better, and one very intelligent person trying to figure out how to stop it from taking control, and maybe you should be more balanced. ”
Hinton warned that the dangers of “artificial intelligence ” must be taken seriously, saying:“ I think it ’ s important for people to realize that this is not science fiction or just fear, ” stressing that “it ’ s a real risk that we have to think about, and we have to figure out how to deal with it beforehand. ”
Hinton also expressed concern that AI would deepen inequality, where the vast gains from its productivity would go to the rich, not the workers, and said that “wealth will not go to the people who work, it will make the rich richer, not the poor, and this is a very bad society. ”
He also pointed to the danger of "fake news" that can be created by robots such as ChatGPT, expressing the hope that content generated by "artificial intelligence" programs will be marked, and that central banks will mark monetary currencies.
Hinton also stressed that “it is very important to try, for example, to identify everything that is fake as fake, I don ’ t know if we can do that technically or not. ”
This comes as big tech companies such as Microsoft, Google and others are racing to make advances in artificial intelligence, which some experts warn could replace some human jobs, while others say AI will help generate other jobs for humans.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres earlier announced his support for the creation of a UN agency specialized in artificial intelligence "inspired by the International Atomic Energy Agency", noting that only member states are the decision-makers.
Shafaq Live
Shafaq Live

A UK Parliament committee warns of AI’s existential threat and many challenges.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

Google pledges responsible AI, e.g., reducing bias via a Harvard skin tone scale.

Title:

Content: Google seeks to fix fairness in AI technology

By Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press, Toronto

Automation / Robotics Electronics AI artificial intelligence Google Technology

But artificial intelligence still has biases echoed by society

An artificial intelligence researcher at Google says fixing fairness in the technology “isn’t a simple thing,” but the world has an opportunity to get it right as the software explodes in popularity.

“It’s as though we have been given a second chance on how we use this technology to dismantle some of the biases we see in society,” Komal Singh, a senior product manager at the tech goliath, said in a Tuesday media briefing in Toronto.

Her optimism comes as the tech sector – and nearly every other industry – have spent the year abuzz about AI’s promise and perils.

Source: Getty Images

Some see the technology as a game changer bound to disrupt everyday life and bring expediency, efficiency and solutions to some of the globe’s biggest challenges. Others, including Tesla owner Elon Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, warn advances in the technology are moving too fast and guardrails are needed before wide-scale deployments.

Advertisement

Geoffrey Hinton, the British-Canadian computer scientist widely considered the `godfather of AI’, is so concerned with the technology he left Google so he can more freely discuss the dangers, which he has said include bias and discrimination, joblessness, echo chambers, fake news, battle robots and existential risk. Singh acknowledged AI is not without risks. She’s even seen them firsthand. For example, she said if you ask an AI model to generate an image of a nurse it will often return a woman, while a request for an image of a CEO typically brings up a white man and a query for a software engineer delivers racialized men.

A lot needs to happen to fix the fairness

“In a nutshell, I think the takeaway is a lot needs to happen to fix the fairness problem,” Singh said.

At Google, some of that work has come from studying skin tones because dark and medium tones often can’t be deciphered by computer vision systems, which allow computers to “see and understand” images of people and environments.

“This is problematic because a lot of the social disparities around colourism then get populated into social technical systems, which then end up reinforcing them,” Singh said.

To break the cycle, Google partnered with Harvard University professor, Dr. Ellis Monk to design an open-source skin tone scale that can better detect darker tones and be used by AI models to reduce biases. It’s already been deployed within its camera detection technology, on Pixel phones and in search tools, helping to diversify results so keywords bring up a range of skin tones and hair textures. The company also has a project called Media Understanding for Social Exploration, which studied 12 years of American television shows to analyze representation across skin tones.

Racing to develop and launch the most advanced technology

Their findings were “stark,” Singh said. Over the past 12 years, there was a slight increase in the screen time given to those with dark and medium skin tones, while the amount of time those with lighter skin spent on screen was slightly lower. Such work comes at a pivotal time for AI. Top tech companies are racing to develop and launch the most advanced technology, competing with one another for billions of dollars pouring into the industry.

In Canada, Google estimates generative AI could increase the economy by $210 billion and save the average worker over 100 hours a year. Google leaders accompanying Singh said they’re already using AI to improve breast cancer detection, sequence genomes and develop systems that medical clinicians can plug questions into to generate health guidance. E-commerce giant Shopify Inc. is using the technology to reduce search abandonment, while Canadian National Railway Co. is building a digital supply chain platform with automated shipment tracking, Google workers said.

At Google, AI underpins the company’s search engine, maps and cloud storage and is the basis for Bard, its rival product to ChatGPT, that has yet to launch in Canada. Sam Sebastian, the head of Google Cloud’s Canadian operations, promised it would make its Canadian debut “very soon,” but offered no specific timeline. Instead, he discussed his overall outlook on AI, saying it was a technological shift unlike anything he’s seen in his 25 years working in the industry.

“The only thing close to it is the advent of the mobile phone,” he said.

The transformative nature means anyone in the space needs to balance AI’s potential with its risks, he said. For its part, Google has committed to abide by a series of principles as it delves deeper into AI. It has so far promised not to design or deploy AI technologies that cause or are likely to harm, including weapons or systems used to inflict injuries. It also says it will not work on AI-based “surveillance violating internationally accepted norms” or systems which will contravene laws and human rights.

Advertisement

Stories continue below

Print this page

Related Stories

Some experts estimate a 4–20% chance of a globally impactful AI incident, prompting industry leaders to prioritize risk mitigation.

AI development should be transparent and responsible to balance benefits and risks.

Title:

Content: 【 Printing 】
Finding a balance between innovation and safety
Related LINKS http: / / www.CRNT.com 2024-02-16 09: 01: 57
BEIJING, Feb. 16 (Xinhua) -- With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, how to solve the security problems it brings has become a global issue.
Delegates from 27 European Union countries recently voted unanimously to support the final text of the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), pushing the EU to take another important step towards legislative regulation of artificial intelligence.
EU Internal Market Commissioner Thierry Breton said the 27 countries unanimously supported the bill, saying they recognized that “negotiators have found the perfect balance between innovation and security. ”
The bill, introduced by the European Commission as early as 2021, requires a list of regulations that prohibit AI from doing business, based on the risk level of artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities.
Since then, with the explosion of ChatGPT generative AI systems and the attendant risks to employment, privacy, and copyright protection, European lawmakers have pushed for the bill to cover the “foundational model, ” the advanced system that underpins general AI services such as ChatGPT.
However, this “expansion ” raises one of the biggest sticking points that has plagued the bill.
Some countries, including France and Germany, are concerned that the bill ’ s strict regulation of advanced AI models will hinder the development of artificial intelligence in Europe.
In this regard, the European Commission said that it will launch a number of initiatives to support AI innovation, including the establishment of a dedicated regulatory body, and the exclusion of AI developed for scientific research from the scope of regulation.
But until recently, when the final text of the bill was unanimously approved, lawmakers and EU countries were still engaged in a heated debate on how to strike a balance between promoting innovation and preventing risks.
In the end, the German Federal Minister of Digital and Transport Fork Wiesen announced on the eve of the bill's vote that the "German debate on the position of the artificial intelligence bill" had ended and a "feasible compromise" had been reached.
France, for its part, relented after achieving a “balance of transparency and trade secrets ” and easing the administrative burden of managing high-risk AI systems.
At the same time, CCIA, a lobbying group composed of technology giants such as Apple, Google, Meta, and others, remains uneasy about the EU AI legislation, saying that there are still many uncertainties in the new rules, which may slow the development and promotion of innovative applications of artificial intelligence in Europe.
From the perspective of many parties, this bill has not yet reached the so-called "perfect balance".
However, the EU countries are still trying to reach a compromise, one of the main reasons is that the current pace of development of artificial intelligence innovation has far exceeded the pace of technical regulation, legal ethics, and policy evaluation, and there is an urgent need for a more far-sighted governance framework to deal with unknown challenges.
Among the top 10 short-term risks for 2024 summarized by the World Economic Forum, AI has outpaced climate change, economic weakness, and war as the biggest risk.
At present, major economies around the world have accelerated the improvement of the relevant governance framework.
In July 2023, China introduced the world ’ s leading “Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services ” for Generative AI.
In the United States, non-legislative measures such as the "Blueprint for the Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights" are the main measures to regulate the development of artificial intelligence.
Countries such as Canada, South Korea, and Japan have also begun to adopt regulations and restrictions in the field of artificial intelligence.
At the same time, more and more countries and regions recognize that AI has cross-national, cross-cultural, and cross-domain characteristics, and that a regulatory framework established by a single country in its own interests cannot solve the practical problems in AI governance.
At the third Belt and Road International Cooperation Summit, China put forward the Global AI Governance Initiative, calling on all parties to carry out communication, exchanges and pragmatic cooperation on global AI governance. In November 2023, more than 20 countries and regions, including China, the United States and the European Union, jointly signed the first global AI statement, the Bletchley Declaration, and agreed to establish an AI regulatory approach through international cooperation.
In this way, while the relevant EU legislation is continuously promoted within the region, it is also necessary to further embed internal supervision into the international mechanism, and actively seek to build a multilateral AI supervision and cooperation platform, in order to truly find the “perfect balance ” between innovation and security.
Source: The Journal of the Economy: Yang Chi-lin
【 Printing 】
Related News:

Title:

Content: Newsnews

Governments Are Taking Action To Regulate AI

In a move to address the growing concerns around artificial intelligence (AI), G7 countries are taking steps to create a code of AI conduct for companies. This comes as the Biden administration in the United States has issued an executive order regarding the regulation of AI. The aim is to ensure that AI technologies are developed and deployed responsibly and ethically.

Key Takeaway

G7 countries are working to establish a code of conduct for AI, while the Biden administration has issued an executive order to regulate AI in the United States. These efforts aim to ensure responsible and ethical AI development, addressing concerns around privacy, fairness, and security.

Regulating AI to Protect Consumers and Society

The increasing prevalence of AI in various industries has raised concerns about its potential impact on privacy, security, and fairness. With AI being integrated into critical systems such as healthcare, transportation, and finance, there is a need for comprehensive regulations to safeguard consumers and society.

The G7 countries, including the United States, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom, are working collectively to establish a code of conduct for AI. This code will outline guidelines and principles that companies should adhere to when developing and deploying AI technologies. The goal is to ensure transparency, accountability, and fairness in AI systems.

The Biden administration’s executive order seeks to strengthen the governance and regulation of AI within the United States. It emphasizes the need for collaboration between government agencies, industry, and academic institutions to address the ethical and societal implications of AI. The order aims to promote responsible AI development, mitigate biases, protect privacy, and ensure the safety and security of AI systems.

Implications for Tech Companies

The code of AI conduct and the executive order will have significant implications for tech companies involved in AI development and deployment. They will need to consider the ethical implications of their AI technologies and take appropriate measures to ensure transparency and fairness.

Companies will need to invest in robust AI governance frameworks that promote responsible AI development and mitigate potential biases. This will involve implementing processes for data privacy protection, algorithmic transparency, and bias detection and mitigation.

The increased regulation of AI is a positive step towards addressing the concerns surrounding the technology. It will help build trust among consumers and ensure that AI is used in a manner that benefits society as a whole.

Title:

Content: 【 Printing 】
Artificial intelligence governance: new cooperation between Europe and the United States or a new game
http: / / www.CRNTT.com 2023-12-22 12: 58: 44
BEIJING, Dec. 22 / According to the Guangming Daily, with the rapid development of artificial intelligence in recent years, the competition among major Western countries for the leadership of artificial intelligence rule-making has become increasingly fierce.
Recently, the European Parliament, EU member states and the European Commission reached an agreement on the Artificial Intelligence Act, which will become the world ’ s first comprehensive regulation in the field of artificial intelligence.
EU Internal Market Commissioner Thierry Breton said that the AI Act is not only a rulebook, but also a booster for EU start-ups and researchers to lead the global AI race.
European Union: Artificial Intelligence Governance Legislation First
The EU ’ s idea of AI rule-making is legislative in the first place and has gradually improved its legal framework over the past few years.
As early as April 2018, the European Commission issued a document outlining ways to coordinate the development and deployment of AI, aiming to increase investment in AI research and innovation. In February 2020, the European Commission issued a White Paper on Artificial Intelligence, proposing a regulatory framework for AI, covering issues such as risk assessment, transparency, data use and legal liability, and recommending the classification of AI applications at different risk levels. April 2021 In June 2022, the European Commission proposed the world ’ s first regulation on artificial intelligence to ensure that artificial intelligence systems used in the EU are safe, transparent, traceable, non-discriminatory and environmentally friendly. In June 2022, the European Parliament passed a draft negotiating mandate for a proposal for an artificial intelligence bill that classifies artificial intelligence systems as risk, limits deep forgery, and sets requirements for greater transparency for generative artificial intelligence.
In addition to leading the pace of legislation around the world, the European Union is also trying to promote regulatory standards for artificial intelligence around the world.
Brando Benifi, a member of the European Parliament responsible for the work on the Artificial Intelligence Act, said that EU lawmakers will build “responsible AI pathways ” for the rest of the world.
According to previous media reports, the European Union is carrying out a "lobbying lightning war", hoping to persuade Asian countries to recognize the EU's leading position in the field of artificial intelligence regulation, so that the EU "Artificial Intelligence Act" will become the global standard in the field of artificial intelligence regulation.
At present, the European Union and its member states have sent officials to discuss the issue with at least 10 Asian countries, including India, Japan, South Korea, Singapore and the Philippines.
US: Artificial intelligence policy encourages technology development and application
The United States ’ AI governance policy focuses on the development and application of technology. Compared with the European Union, its policy on AI is relatively relaxed. Although it also faces the security challenges of AI, the United States does not carry out special research and classification of AI risks like the European Union, but focuses on fairness caused by algorithmic discrimination and data privacy security protection.
In terms of governance tools, the United States tends to address related security risks through industry self-regulation and industry guidelines, such as urging companies to develop their own AI ethics guidelines and reducing the risk of algorithmic discrimination through internal audits and self-supervision.
In recent years, technologies such as generative artificial intelligence have been maturing.
In order to ensure the safety and reliability of generative AI technology, the US government has gradually strengthened its supervision and issued a series of policy documents to strengthen AI governance in order to maintain the US hegemony in this field and reduce the security risks of artificial intelligence.
Since the release of the Blueprint for the Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights in 2022, the US government has issued a number of principles to guide the design, development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence systems, and encourage the industry to voluntarily adhere to the relevant principles and self-regulate, thus gradually forming the basic framework for AI governance in the United States.
Europe and the United States: rule making is both competitive and cooperative
As a "leader" in the field of artificial intelligence rule-making, there is a relationship between Europe and America that is both competitive and cooperative.
The cooperation between the two sides is mainly based on the US-EU Trade and Technology Commission established in June 2021 as a platform, based on the relevant regulations and policy documents issued by the US and the EU, and the two sides guide the development of emerging technologies based on common values, and strive to achieve future agreement on risk regulation methods and other aspects. The three aspects of development and risk monitoring guide the development of artificial intelligence risk management and trusted artificial intelligence, and promote the development of relevant international standards.
In this document, "the United States and the European Union jointly support and lead the development of international technical standards" is highlighted.
However, from the practical effect, although the United States has begun to converge with the European Union in the field of artificial intelligence regulation, there are still some structural problems that are difficult to coordinate.
For example, at the strategic level, US security and foreign policy institutions regard AI as an important national security asset for major power competition, making it a tool for expanding technological influence; but the EU is more concerned with the ethical challenges of AI technology based on economic development and values.
At the level of risk management concepts, the United States encourages the innovation and development of artificial intelligence technology, emphasizing the scientific nature and flexibility of regulation; while the European Union ’ s regulatory style takes into account development and regulation, and hopes to reshape the global digital development model through high-standard legislation and regulation.
In terms of regulatory approach, the United States focuses on technology application and process supervision, while the European Union focuses on organizational management and risk management.
In addition, in areas such as data governance and privacy protection, the two sides also have conflict of ideas.
According to media reports, the United States has warned the European Union that its proposed regulation of artificial intelligence will benefit those companies that have the resources to bear the cost of compliance, and hurt those smaller companies, which is a concrete manifestation of the conflict of ideas between the two sides.
Building a global AI development environment
At the first AI Security Summit held in early November, representatives from the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union, China, and India discussed the risks and opportunities brought about by the rapid development of AI technology.
After the meeting, 28 countries and the European Union signed the Bletchley Declaration, pledging to work together to build trustworthy and responsible AI.
Host Britain also announced that the next AI Security Summit will be held in France in a year ’ s time, and South Korea will co-host a small virtual summit in the next six months.
It is foreseeable that with the development and popularization of artificial intelligence, the regulation and regulation of artificial intelligence by the international community will become a global issue.
The legislation and cooperation between the United States and the United States in the field of artificial intelligence has certain implications for other countries around the world.
However, in the process of establishing and improving the international artificial intelligence governance standard system, in addition to a few "leaders", there are many participants.
Countries around the world should actively exert their influence and jointly promote the construction of an open and mutually beneficial environment for the development of artificial intelligence.
【 Printing 】

Title:

Content: In a landmark move, the European Council has approved the Artificial Intelligence Act, potentially setting the first global standards for AI regulation.

On Tuesday, May 21st, the Council of the European Union took a significant step in regulating artificial intelligence, approving a groundbreaking law that sets a global benchmark for harmonising AI rules.

AI Act: A Game Changer for AI Regulation?

The law aims to promote the development and use of trustworthy AI across the EU's single market, fostering innovation while safeguarding fundamental rights like privacy and non-discrimination.

The AI Act establishes an innovation-friendly legal framework and promotes evidence-based learning through AI regulatory sandboxes. These sandboxes provide controlled environments for developing, testing, and validating novel AI systems in real-world settings.

How Will The AI Act Identify System Risks?

The legislation will separate AI systems into categories based on risk levels. AI systems posing limited risk will be subject to minimal transparency obligations. On the other hand, high-risk AI systems will face stringent obligations before entering the EU market.

For instance, the Act bans high-risk AI, including systems designed for manipulative persuasion (e.g., cognitive behavioural manipulation) and social scoring. It also restricts AI use in areas like predictive policing based on profiling and biometric categorisation by sensitive characteristics such as race, religion, or sexual orientation.

Who Will The AI Act Apply To?

The EU AI Act will primarily applies to the 27 members of the European Union. However, its reach extends beyond the bloc, potentially impacting companies that provide AI systems or services used in the EU.

Per a Reuters report, non-EU companies using EU customer data on their platforms must comply. The EU's AI Act could become a landmark precedent, inspiring other countries and regions to also develop their own AI regulations.

Enforcing the Rules

The AI Act establishes a multi-layered enforcement framework to ensure effective implementation across the EU. This includes:

An AI Office within the European Commission: This office will be vital in offering scientific and technical expertise to enforce activities.

An AI Board with Member State representatives: This board will act as an advisor and assist the Commission and member states in ensuring consistent application of the AI Act across the bloc.

An advisory forum for stakeholders: This will bring together various stakeholders to contribute their technical expertise and advise the AI Board and the Commission.

Companies that violate the AI Act will face hefty fines, potentially reaching a percentage of their global annual turnover in the previous financial year or a predetermined amount, whichever is higher. The Act also considers proportional administrative fines for smaller businesses and startups.

Once the relevant EU officials sign, the AI Act will be published in the EU's Official Journal within days and officially enter into force 20 days after publication. However, most provisions will only become fully applicable two years after this date, with some exceptions taking effect sooner.

While AI safety researchers warn of a high probability of existential threats from AI (some estimate close to 100%), figures like Elon Musk advocate for continued research, arguing that the risk is closer to 20%. The EU's AI Act aims to address these concerns by overseeing the development and use of AI to mitigate potential risks.

This timely law comes at a time when scammers have increasingly turned to AI-powered tools like ChatGPT to create sophisticated deep fakes or impersonate real people in online scams. The AI Act, which focuses on transparency and accountability, might play a key role in curbing such deceptive practices.

Title:

Content: The EU AI Act Overview

PS
Papilio Services Limited

Contributor

Papilio Services Limited, established in 2012, is based in Malta with sister companies in the Netherlands and the Czech Republic. The firm boasts a multinational team and a diverse client base, providing cross-border solutions in Corporate, Tax Compliance, and Residency services on a global scale.
The European Parliament achieved a key milestone by adopting the landmark Artificial Intelligence Act, paving the way for the European Union's first complete legal framework for artificial intelligence (AI).
European Union Technology
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The European Parliament achieved a key milestone by adopting the landmark Artificial Intelligence Act, paving the way for the European Union's first complete legal framework for artificial intelligence (AI). This pioneering law seeks to achieve a compromise between the AI industry's need for innovation and the imperatives of upholding fundamental rights and guaranteeing the security and reliability of AI systems. The EU's determination to lead the world in ethical AI governance is reflected in the EU AI Act which upholds citizens' rights and interests while promoting a strong technological environment.

Ensuring Safety and Protecting Rights

The primary objective of the EU AI Act is to establish a regulatory environment that ensures AI systems deployed within the EU are safe, transparent, and respect fundamental rights. This is achieved through a risk-based approach that categorises AI systems into different risk levels, each with corresponding regulatory requirements. High-risk AI systems, which pose significant risks to health, safety, or fundamental rights, are subject to stringent regulations, including rigorous testing, documentation, and human oversight.

The EU AI Act mandates that AI systems must be designed and developed in a manner that upholds fundamental rights, such as privacy, non-discrimination, and data protection. This emphasis on fundamental rights reflects the EU's commitment to creating a human-centric AI landscape, where technology serves the needs and values of society. By prioritizing the safety and rights of individuals, the legislation aims to build public trust in AI technologies, which is crucial for their widespread adoption and acceptance.

Boosting Innovation and Competitiveness

The EU AI Act aims to encourage innovation and competitiveness in the AI industry even as it places stringent limitations on high-risk AI systems. The law contains provisions intended to aid in the creation and application of AI technology, especially for startups and small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs). The intention is to foster innovation by lowering administrative burdens and offering clear legislative rules, which will promote the development of a thriving AI ecosystem in Europe.

Focusing on encouraging cooperation between the public and private sectors is one of the main features of the EU AI Act. To guarantee that AI technologies are created in accordance with societal needs and values, the act promotes collaboration and partnerships between researchers, developers, and regulatory organisations.

By adopting a risk-based approach to regulation, it recognises that not all AI systems pose the same level of risk. The legislation classifies AI systems into three main categories: unacceptable risk, high risk, and limited risk. This tiered approach allows the EU to tailor its regulatory framework to the specific risks associated with different AI applications, ensuring that regulations are proportionate and effective.

Transparency and Accountability

Transparency and accountability are key to the EU AI Act's principles. The law requires AI systems to be open about how they operate and make decisions, especially those that are deemed high-risk. This entails giving consumers information that is easy to comprehend regarding the operation of AI systems, the data they use, and the reasoning behind their choices.

The statute mandates that high-risk AI systems be created in a way that permits efficient human intervention, underscoring the significance of human control. This guarantees that people maintain control and have the ability to step in when needed to stop damage or fix mistakes, and to ensure that AI technologies are used responsibly and ethically by increasing accountability and transparency.

EU Leadership in AI Governance

The adoption of the EU AI Act establishes the EU as a global leader in AI governance, laying the groundwork for other governments and regions to follow. The EU wants to ensure that AI technologies are used responsibly and ethically, making a positive impact on society, by creating a thorough legal framework.

The EU's commitment to advancing global collaboration in AI governance is also reflected in the legal framework. The law has measures for working together with foreign partners, including exchanging best practices and creating international standards. The EU aims to provide a harmonised legal framework that protects fundamental rights, ensures the safe use of AI technologies, and promotes innovation through international cooperation.

EU AI Act Next steps

The regulation will enter into force 20 days after its publication in the official journal and be directly applicable to 27 Member States, including Malta, on 2nd August 2026, except for bans on prohibited practises, which will apply 6 months after the entry into force date; codes of practise (9 months after entry into force); general-purpose AI rules including governance (12 months after entry into force); and obligations for high-risk systems (36 months).

Businesses will have to ensure alignment with the following:

  • Inventory all AI systems that you have (or will have) developed or deployed, and establish if any of them are subject to the EU AI Act.
  • In order to ascertain the risk categorization of the in-scope AI systems and the relevant compliance requirements, evaluate and classify the systems.
  • Acknowledge your company's place in pertinent AI value chains, the related compliance requirements, and the means by which these requirements will be fulfilled. All functions accountable for the AI systems along the value chain must incorporate compliance throughout the systems' lifecycle.
  • Understand the additional risks (such as interacting with other EU or non-EU rules, such as those pertaining to data privacy) and opportunities (such as providing access to AI Act sandboxes for innovators, small and medium-sized businesses, and others) that the AI Act presents to the strategy and operations of your organisation.
  • Develop and implement a plan to guarantee that, upon the Act's implementation, the proper risk and control systems, quality management, documentation, accountability and governance frameworks, and monitoring are in place.

The purpose of this article is to provide a general overview of the subject matter. Should you require additional information please refer to Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More

Title:

Content: US issues order regulating development of AI

US President Joe Biden has issued an order regulating the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and ensuring AI safety, security, and trust. The order requires companies like Google, Amazon, and Microsoft to share safety test results with the government for AI models that pose potential risks. Stronger standards for AI will be developed, including metrics for safety testing, guidelines for watermarking AI-generated content, and ethical principles for AI use in intelligence-gathering. The administration also aims to protect privacy, prevent discrimination, and establish international frameworks for AI. These actions are part of an aggressive strategy to harness AI benefits and mitigate risks.
NEW DELHI: After being warned that Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be harmful to humanity, US President Joe Biden issued an order on Monday regulating the development of AI.
In a statement, the White House deputy chief of staff Bruce Reed said, “President Biden is rolling out the strongest set of actions any government in the world has ever taken on AI safety, security, and trust.”
He further stated that this is the next step in an "aggressive strategy" to do everything on all fronts to harness the benefits of AI and mitigate the risks.

It is pertinent to note that Google, Amazon, and Microsoft-backed AI will now be required to share safety test results with the government whenever they train an AI model that poses a potential “serious risk to national security, national economic security, or national public health and safety.”
Stronger standards for AI
Under this new strategy, new stronger standards will be developed for the AI. After the AI experts expressed feats that the technology could be used to help engineer bioweapons, Biden planned to roll out stronger standards.
Biden is tasking the National Institute of Standards and Technology to craft metrics for so-called “red-testing” to ensure safety in the programs. He is also asking the commerce department to set up guidelines for watermarking AI-generated content.

Additionally, the president is tapping the National Security Council to iron out ethical AI principles for the use of the technology in intelligence-gathering operations.
To protect privacy
As AI is dangerous and after seeing various crimes using this intelligence, Biden is calling for the federal government to help finance research into technologies like cryptographic tools that can protect against eavesdropping.
The administration is also planning to study how companies extract commercially available information and encourage the use of AI training modules that are designed to protect privacy.
The Department of Justice and federal civil rights offices will also be required to compile best practices on how to prevent the technology from being used to amplify discrimination.
Approaches international agencies
Looming over the new concerns that bolstered AI regulations could stifle US development of the critical technology and cede ground to geopolitical rivals such as China.
To address this, Biden is making the State and Commerce departments push for international frameworks on the new technology.
The administration will also work to streamline visas to entice highly skilled workers and developers into the US.
Additionally, the administration will build up the National AI Research Resource, which will help give AI developers access to an array of resources to further their research projects in a bid to buoy innovation.
The announcement of Biden’s executive order is the first in a series of AI-related events and initiatives planned for this week.
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Governments and alliances are adding oversight like the EU AI Act to ensure safety, human oversight, and rights.

Hinton urges labeling AI-generated content and more AI safety investment to oversee powerful systems.

Title:

Content: Presented By
Getty Images
Ideas
Jan Brauner is a Ph.D. researcher in Artificial Intelligence at the University of Oxford, focusing on the safety of AI systems and their application in public health.
Alan Chan is a Ph.D. student at Mila, a research institute in Montreal focusing on AI, where he works on technical and socio-technical problems in AI safety. He's particularly interested in evaluation and AI regulation.

In May, more than 100 artificial intelligence (AI) professors, including some of the field's leading experts, scholars from other areas, and AI executives signed a one-sentence statement: "Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.” Many signing researchers have explained their reason for worry: the risk that we might build powerful AI systems that we cannot control within this decade or the next ones.

Some have suggested the statement is an industry ploy to hype up AI companies’ products or influence regulation, ignoring that most of the signatories—ourselves included—are academics who do not work for industry. But the most common concern we have heard is that, by focusing on the risk of extinction, the statement distracts from present-day AI harms. As volunteers involved in collecting signatures for and constructing the statement, we disagree because both problems share a common core. The false dichotomy between ongoing harms and emergent risks makes it needlessly difficult to address common root causes.

AI poses many ongoing problems. AI systems can sustain human rights abuses, perpetuate systemic discrimination, and entrench power imbalances. Because AI systems are often widely deployed, harms can reach massive scales. For example, tens of thousands of families were pushed into poverty when the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration wrongly accused them of fraud and requested they pay back large sums of money, based on risk profiles created with AI systems.

The root causes of AI harm

There are several root causes that contribute to many instances of the harm caused by AI. One is that we do not know how to design AI systems that reliably behave exactly as we intend them to. For example, a health system was designed to allocate care based on need but discriminated against Black hospital patients. It turned out the algorithm used health care costs as a proxy for need, but institutionalized racism means that less money has been spent on Black patients historically. In many similar cases, companies do not explicitly set out to build harmful AI systems. Instead, creating state-of-the-art AI systems requires vast amounts of data, and the AI systems unintendedly inherit the biases encoded in this data.

Another cause is competitive pressures and limited accountability. There is often a strong economic incentive to deploy AI systems without sufficient safety checks. For example, Microsoft rushed the release of the Bing chatbot, which resulted in the chatbot threatening and insulting users. When the Dutch Tax Administration replaced human judgment with AI systems, this, too, happened in the name of efficiency.

Without decisive action to address these root causes, increasingly powerful and widely deployed AI systems will cause even more pervasive and significant harm. Many experts believe future AI systems may outmatch humans in crucial cognitive skills, such as social persuasion, planning, and development of novel technologies. Just as these cognitive abilities enabled humanity to control the fate of other species, the same skills could enable smarter AI systems to out-perform us. Given competition and limited accountability, there would be pressure on organizations to replace expensive human labor with AI systems. Economic forces encourage the rapid deployment of new AI systems (at the cost of safety testing), making them ever more powerful, building general (and potentially more powerful) systems rather than narrow (and potentially more controllable) systems, and increasing the autonomy of AI systems to take action in the world. AI systems could increasingly control our society's key productive, managerial, and military capacities. By then, we must have figured out how to design systems that always and truly behave as we intend. Otherwise, powerful AI systems that pursue goals at odds with humanity could lead to human marginalization or even extinction.

Read More: An AI Pause is Humanity's Best Bet for Preventing Extinction

Moreover, many researchers expect us to develop such advanced AI systems very soon. Companies are pouring more money and talent into AI development while the cost of computing power is decreasing. Simply using more computing power and data has reliably produced more capable AI systems, while AI algorithms have also improved. After seeing the rapid progress in AI over the past five years, Geoffrey Hinton, a founding father of modern AI, now expects that AI could broadly surpass human cognitive abilities—such as persuasion, planning, and scientific reasoning—within five to 20 years. Such time horizons are shared by many in the AI research community.

Twenty years is short; in discussions about the climate crisis, we regularly consider effects on such timescales. And just as climate change requires us to face air pollution and ongoing natural disasters as well as prevent future, even more, extreme weather events, we must tackle various AI risks and harms simultaneously. Even if we might be a couple of decades away from AI systems that are smarter than humans, that is little time to create the complex global governance structures necessary for this technology.

Work to address ongoing harms sometimes differs from work to manage extinction risk. We do not wish to erase nuance or potential differences between the perspectives. Yet, given common root causes, there is much room for collaboration and cooperation.

Four possible interventions

Many interventions could address the root problems. First, the public currently has little to no say over what models are built and how they are deployed. For example, those most affected by welfare systems have had little say in their automation. Private companies decide which risks are acceptable, as they have free rein over computing power and data, the key levers of AI development. Stronger democratic oversight over the supply of computing power and data would enhance public control over AI development and associated risks. For example, governments can monitor when large amounts of computing power are being used and for what purpose.

Second, a strong auditing regime, where independent third-parties would scrutinize the practices and development processes of AI labs, would help reduce risks overall. Auditing has already surfaced previously overlooked harms, such as bias in facial recognition, and could catch future failure modes like AI systems subverting human control or replicating autonomously. A standards body could ensure  AI systems, both before and after deployment, meet specified safety guidelines. Domestic agencies could enforce compliance, while an international organization would create universal standards.

Third, we should require meaningful human oversight of critical AI decisions, and avoid very-high-risk use cases such as lethal autonomous weapons. Uncertainty about AI systems' current and near-future capabilities means we should proceed cautiously around their deployment in critical domains.

Fourth, we should rebalance the  funding going into AIs and urge companies to spend less on making them smarter while increasing funding into making them safer, more transparent, and studying their social impacts. While it is good that industry labs are funding such research, this funding is liable to change with market conditions. Much more public funding for non-industry groups is required.

The development of increasingly powerful AI systems poses increasingly vast societal-scale risks. The complexity of these risks requires cooperation between people with potentially different motivations but with a shared interest in ensuring that AI development proceeds in a just and beneficial way.

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com.

You May Also Like
EDIT POST

Title:

Content: Information Technology
The father of artificial intelligence urges governments to face its risks before disaster
Jeffrey Hinton, described as the father of artificial intelligence, on Wednesday urged governments to intervene to ensure that machines do not control society.
Hinton made headlines in May when he announced his resignation from Google to speak more freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, shortly after the launch of ChatGPT, which captivated the world.
The artificial intelligence scientist, who is studying at the University of Toronto, spoke to a crowd at the Collagen Technology Conference in the Canadian city.
The conference attracted more than 30,000 startup founders, investors and tech workers, most of whom were eager to learn how to ride the wave of artificial intelligence rather than hear lessons about its risks or calls for governments to intervene.
“Before AI becomes smarter than us, I think the people who develop it should be encouraged to put a lot of effort into understanding how it can try to take control of us, ” Hinton said.
“Now there are 99 highly intelligent people trying to make AI better, and one very intelligent person trying to figure out how to stop it from taking control, and maybe we should be more balanced. ”
Hinton warned that the dangers of artificial intelligence must be taken seriously.
“I think it ’ s important for people to understand that this is not science fiction or just fear, ” he said, adding:“ It ’ s a real risk that we have to think about, and we have to figure out how to deal with it first. ”
Hinton expressed concern that AI would deepen inequality, as the vast gains from its productivity would go to the rich, not the workers.
“Wealth will not go to the people who work, it will make the rich richer, not the poor, and this is a very bad society, ” he said.
He also pointed to the danger of “fake news ” that can be created by robots such as ChatGPT, hoping to mark the content generated by artificial intelligence programs as central banks mark coins.
He stressed that it is important to “try, for example, to distinguish everything that is fake as fake, ” and said,“ I don ’ t know if we can do it technically or not. ”
“The Island Net ”

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

His warnings underscore the need for responsible development to protect jobs, information, and safety.

Title:

Content: Information Technology
The father of artificial intelligence urges governments to face its risks before disaster
Jeffrey Hinton, described as the father of artificial intelligence, on Wednesday urged governments to intervene to ensure that machines do not control society.
Hinton made headlines in May when he announced his resignation from Google to speak more freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, shortly after the launch of ChatGPT, which captivated the world.
The artificial intelligence scientist, who is studying at the University of Toronto, spoke to a crowd at the Collagen Technology Conference in the Canadian city.
The conference attracted more than 30,000 startup founders, investors and tech workers, most of whom were eager to learn how to ride the wave of artificial intelligence rather than hear lessons about its risks or calls for governments to intervene.
“Before AI becomes smarter than us, I think the people who develop it should be encouraged to put a lot of effort into understanding how it can try to take control of us, ” Hinton said.
“Now there are 99 highly intelligent people trying to make AI better, and one very intelligent person trying to figure out how to stop it from taking control, and maybe we should be more balanced. ”
Hinton warned that the dangers of artificial intelligence must be taken seriously.
“I think it ’ s important for people to understand that this is not science fiction or just fear, ” he said, adding:“ It ’ s a real risk that we have to think about, and we have to figure out how to deal with it first. ”
Hinton expressed concern that AI would deepen inequality, as the vast gains from its productivity would go to the rich, not the workers.
“Wealth will not go to the people who work, it will make the rich richer, not the poor, and this is a very bad society, ” he said.
He also pointed to the danger of “fake news ” that can be created by robots such as ChatGPT, hoping to mark the content generated by artificial intelligence programs as central banks mark coins.
He stressed that it is important to “try, for example, to distinguish everything that is fake as fake, ” and said,“ I don ’ t know if we can do it technically or not. ”
“The Island Net ”

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?