The flat Earth movement has gained significant attention in recent years, with various organizations and individuals promoting this belief across the globe.

According to a study by the University of New Hampshire, millennials and Trump supporters are more likely to believe in conspiracy theories, including the flat Earth theory.

The study found that acceptance or openness to conspiracy beliefs was significantly higher among certain subgroups, including millennials and supporters of ex-president Trump.

The flat Earth movement is not a new phenomenon, but it has gained momentum in the internet era, with social media platforms providing a breeding ground for conspiracy theories to spread.

The movement is characterized by a rejection of scientific evidence and a reliance on unverifiable sources of information, with many flat-earthers claiming that the Earth is flat because they have not seen any evidence to the contrary.

Some of the arguments used by flat-earthers to prove their point of view include the claim that the horizon always appears to be at eye level, and that the lack of visible curvature of the Earth is evidence that it is flat.

However, these arguments have been thoroughly debunked by scientific evidence, including satellite imagery and measurements of the Earth's curvature.

Despite the lack of scientific evidence to support the flat Earth theory, many people continue to believe in it, often citing conspiracy theories about governments and other organizations covering up the "truth" about the Earth's shape.

The resurgence of the flat Earth movement in the modern era can be attributed to a combination of factors, including the rise of social media and the proliferation of misinformation online.

Social media platforms have created an environment in which conspiracy theories can spread quickly and easily, often without being subject to fact-checking or scrutiny.

Additionally, the flat Earth movement has been promoted by various public figures and celebrities, including some who have large followings on social media.

The characteristics of people who are most likely to subscribe to flat Earth beliefs include a lack of trust in scientific institutions and a tendency to rely on unverifiable sources of information.

According to the study by the University of New Hampshire, younger generations, such as millennials and Gen Z, are more likely to believe in conspiracy theories, including the flat Earth theory.

This may be due to a lack of exposure to scientific evidence and a greater reliance on social media for information.

Overall, the flat Earth movement is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that reflects a broader distrust of scientific institutions and a lack of critical thinking in the internet era.

The movement is characterized by a rejection of scientific evidence and a reliance on unverifiable sources of information, and its proponents often use flawed arguments to support their claims.

Despite the lack of scientific evidence to support the flat Earth theory, it continues to be promoted by various organizations and individuals, often using social media platforms to spread misinformation.

It is essential to address the root causes of the flat Earth movement, including the lack of trust in scientific institutions and the proliferation of misinformation online.

By promoting critical thinking and scientific literacy, we can work to combat the spread of conspiracy theories and promote a more informed and nuanced understanding of the world.

The flat Earth movement has gained significant attention in recent years, with various organizations and individuals promoting this belief across the globe.

According to a study by the University of New Hampshire, millennials and Trump supporters are more likely to believe in conspiracy theories, including the flat Earth theory.

Title:

Content: Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Available On Air Stations
Get entered to win tickets to Paul McCartney at Fenway June 8th with your gift today!
NH News

Who's most likely to be open to conspiracy theories? UNH research points to millennials and Trump supporters

Who are the groups most likely to believe in conspiracy theories? That’s the question a University of New Hampshire researcher recently set out to solve.

Sociology professor Lawrence Hamilton looked into national survey data gauging public beliefs in several conspiracy theories, including: "NASA astronauts did not really land on the Moon" and "The Earth is flat, not round."

After digging into that data, Hamilton found "acceptance or openness to conspiracy beliefs was significantly higher among certain subgroups, including Millennials and supporters of ex-president Trump."

NHPR’s Rick Ganley talked with Hamilton about his findings — and the role social media plays in spreading conspiracy theories. Below is a transcript of their conversation, lightly edited for clarity.

Read more about Hamilton's research here.

Transcript

Rick Ganley: It's worth noting that some of these conspiracy theories are old. Some are more recent. But all of them seemingly were given a boost by social media. And it's not hard to find false information, obviously, about topics online. Did you find it used to be much harder to hear about or be convinced of something like this?

Lawrence Hamilton: Well, I've never asked these questions before, so I don't have my own data. There are Gallup polls going back to the late 1990s that seem to find much smaller fractions of people thinking that the moon landings were faked, for example. So there's some kind of indirect evidence. I don't know if anybody tracked it very well. The number of people who've heard about these theories [that's] rising are the people who are drawn into them. And I'm sure that YouTube and social media — people describe it as a rabbit hole, where if you start watching one video [alleging the Earth is flat], they'll recommend another one for you. And pretty soon it seems like the whole world is all about flat Earth.

Rick Ganley: Your research looked into the political leanings of people who responded. What did you find there?

Lawrence Hamilton: We did find a political correlation, and that wasn't a foregone conclusion, because I had specifically chosen conspiracy theories that are not known to have a clear political [connection]. I mean, there's been a lot of research going back really to the 1960s on the paranoid style in American politics that has found conspiracy theories are more popular among conservatives across a range of issues. In the 1950s, it was conspiracies by Communist infiltration in the U.S. government. Now, it may be conspiracies directed at politicians — [alleging without evidence that former President Barack] Obama is a Muslim, or [President Joe] Biden stole the 2020 election — and others that are targeted at scientists, like climate change is a hoax, COVID-19 is a hoax or COVID precautions or vaccines are a hoax. And I chose none of those. I chose things like: ‘The moon landings were fake,’ or ‘Earth is flat,’ ‘Vaccines implant microchips.’ So it was interesting to find that even there, there's a conservative preference.

Rick Ganley: A lot of this does come down to faith in science and academics and what so-called experts have to say. Do you see this as evidence of a decline in faith in institutions?

Lawrence Hamilton: Well, I would say there's a decline — and this is something we do have data on — there's a wide decline in trust in scientists, and it's largely partisan. It's not so much happening among people who self-identify as liberal or moderate. But among people who identify as conservative or very conservative, there's definitely a decline in trust in scientists. The COVID pandemic was an interesting case in point, because we were actually tracking this on surveys, and trust in the [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] took an enormous nosedive over space about four months, specifically among conservatives. Other groups didn't change. But the conservative trust in the CDC took this huge dive when [former President] Donald Trump's tweeting turned from praising the CDC to attacking it. And with that flip, conservative trust in the CDC flipped as well, and nobody else has changed much.

Rick Ganley: Your research also highlighted a pattern having to do with age. Respondents who classify themselves as millennials, that is those born between 1981 and 1996, were the most likely to agree with some of the conspiracies that you posed. And Gen Zs, I guess, were also more inclined than older respondents. What did you find there?

Lawrence Hamilton: Well, some of that corresponded to previous surveys. There's a section at the end of our report where we say, well, how does this compare with what other people have found? Just as a reality check. And that's been reported by a number of other studies as well. So millennials in particular, and Gen Z to a slightly lesser extent, were much less skeptical about the conspiracies compared with boomers or older generations. And one explanation that's been offered for that, well, two explanations: Regarding the moon landings, of course, older generations lived through those and remember the national pride and excitement and so forth, whereas [for] younger generations, it's something in the history books. So maybe they don't have that sense of having been there when it happened. But the other thing is that you could expect younger generations to be more engaged with social media, which for some people could take them down these rabbit holes again.

Rick Ganley: Does your research have any suggestions on how to stop people from believing in conspiracy theories?

Lawrence Hamilton: That's a real hard one because there's this tendency to get into information silos where all you hear are the voices that reinforce your prejudices. And a thing about conspiracies is that they will give you a reason to reject anything that contradicts them. People have been seeing [the science behind] climate change for a long time, [and] you can't go in with fact sheets. That doesn't persuade anybody. They'll just become convinced that you're part of the hoax, too. There aren't any simple answers. The strongest recommendation is that scientists stay engaged in public communication through every channel they have, and that they try to make their conclusions understandable or accessible to people from a lot of different walks of life who obviously are not reading the peer review journals.

You make NHPR possible.

NHPR is nonprofit and independent. We rely on readers like you to support the local, national, and international coverage on this website. Your support makes this news available to everyone.

Give today. A monthly donation of $5 makes a real difference.

The study found that acceptance or openness to conspiracy beliefs was significantly higher among certain subgroups, including millennials and supporters of ex-president Trump.

The flat Earth movement is not a new phenomenon, but it has gained momentum in the internet era, with social media platforms providing a breeding ground for conspiracy theories to spread.

Title:

Content: Virgin Galactic's history-making space launch has left flat Earth conspiracy theorists losing their minds at the surface of the planet.

Fuming conspiracy theorists believe the recent live stream footage of three civilian astronauts heading into space proves they are correct about their claims.

A few comments on the YouTube livestream saw the nutters break through with their wild theories, foaming at the mouth as they pointed out the lack of "oval" in the Earth.

READ MORE: Virgin Galactic's first civilian spaceflight enters space with Olympian onboard

Their comments were drowned out by furious believers in the spherical nature of the planet, telling others not to "feed the flat earth trolls" as they vied for attention.

One mad comment read "THAT DOESNT LOOK LIKE AN OVAL TO ME," while another equally reasonable individual added: "LOOK AT IT??!!! WHERE IS THE CURVE IN THE EARTH?!!"

Their totally sane comments come as the Richard Branson-owned company set off on a history making flight, taking a former Olympian and a mother-daughter duo to the edges of the atmosphere.

The trio' weightless triumph was not all good news though as a small collection of conspiracy-mad individuals believed it was evidence of a flat Earth.

A third tin foil hat wearer added: "This looks like a flat earth to me."

But cooler heads in the comments prevailed, or tried to, as they hit back at those claiming the earth was flat and tried to reason with those responding to the conspiracy nuts.

One person wrote: "Between the flat-Earthies and the anti-woke twits, this chat is a bit of a fail. Congrats to the crew and the passengers and the people who aren't all bottom hurt by other people doing things."

Another added: "Don't feed the flat earth trolls."

But still the conspiracy-mad members of chat pushed on, with some saying "you can literally see the flat edge of earth" while another, quite plainly, wrote: "IT IS FLAT."

For the latest breaking news stories and incredible tales from the Daily Star, sign up for our newsletter by clicking here.

The movement is characterized by a rejection of scientific evidence and a reliance on unverifiable sources of information, with many flat-earthers claiming that the Earth is flat because they have not seen any evidence to the contrary.

Title:

Content: 9 of TikTok's most controversial and viral conspiracies - including Area 51, One Direction and JonBenét Ramsey

These are the top nine viral conspiracy theories which are being discussed on TikTok right now - including theories about celebrities and mythical creatures
Watch more of our videos on Shots!
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

From secret societies to extraterrestrial enigmas, people like to discuss conspiracy theories. There are many things which do not make sense in this world, and some things which have had people stumped for decades. In some cases, people hope to finally uncover the truth behind some unsolved mysteries, and in others they are convinced something is being hidden.

To find out what the most widely discussed conspiracy theories are in 2024, VegasSlotsOnline has analysed the number of TikTok hashtags for over 45 of the biggest conspiracy theories worldwide, to determine the most popular conspiracies of 2024. The following are the nine top theories which have gone viral on the popular social media platform.

Illuminati

The Illuminati were originally a secret society founded in Bavaria in the 1700s, intending to replace Christianity with a “religion of reason”. The group was said to be shut down by the government after a decade, but some conspiracy theorists believe the society still exists today - and not only that it's operating in secret with a plan to take over the world. Famous figures accused of being part of the Illuminati include US presidents, pop singers and actors.

27 club

Despite sounding like a fun, exclusive society, the 27 Club definitely isn’t one you would want to be in. The name refers to a list of celebrities who have also passed away at age 27, including Jimi Hendrix, Jean-Michel Basquiat, Kurt Cobain, and Amy Winehouse, to name just a few.

Area 51

Area 51 refers to a highly classified United States Air Force facility in Nevada, and it’s very real. The conspiracy theories behind it, however, may not be. The base’s top-secret nature has led to a range of wild theories over the years, with the most popular being that it’s used to carry out research on UFOs and extraterrestrial beings that the US government is keeping under wraps.

JonBenét Ramsey is alive

JonBenét Ramsey, aged 6, was supposedly killed in her family home in 1996. Her killer has never been officially identified, but there are many unusual details about the case, such as a ransom note found in the family’s home, that have sparked a range of popular theories over the years. One particularly outlandish theory is that JonBenét has not died and is actually still alive, despite evidence to the contrary.

'Larries'

‘Larries’ are hardcore One Direction fans who support the idea that Harry Styles and Louis Tomlinson, former bandmates of the hugely popular boyband, are in a romantic relationship. Despite the two artists repeatedly denying these claims, many fans are still insistent that the band’s former management encouraged the pair to keep their relationship secret. Styles is dating model and actress Taylor Russell. Tomlinson is said to be growing close to his on/off girlfriend Eleanor Calder again.

Murder of John Lennon

Beatles musician John Lennon was fatally shot in December 1980 at the age of 40 by an enraged fan. Ever since, conspiracy theories suggesting that the CIA were involved in his death have sprung up in various places, including books and documentaries. The CIA and FBI kept eyes on Lennon due to his left-wing activism, and theorists have suggested that his murderer, Mark Chapman, was operating on their behalf.

BigFoot

The legend of BigFoot dates back thousands of years and is now a modern household name. Theorists believe that a dangerous ape-like creature exists in the forests of North America, occasionally revealing itself to hikers and campers. Many have shared supposed encounters in the form of giant footprints and blurry photographs, though there is still no credible evidence to prove the creature’s existence.

Planet X

Planet X, sometimes known as the Nibiru cataclysm, is a doomsday conspiracy theory with roots in the early 20th century. Its believers theorise that an undiscovered large planet in our solar system will, at some point, collide with Earth. This hypothetical planet is not recognised in mainstream astronomy, however, and is generally rejected by the scientific community for lacking substantial evidence.

Flat earth

One of social media’s most prevalent conspiracy theories is that the Earth is flat in shape rather than a sphere. Many ‘flat earthers’ reject scientific evidence, such as gravity and satellite imagery, with some even suggesting that governments and corporations are keeping the earth’s flat shape a secret from the masses. The flat earth theory is frequently disproved as it contradicts solid scientific principles.

Some of the arguments used by flat-earthers to prove their point of view include the claim that the horizon always appears to be at eye level, and that the lack of visible curvature of the Earth is evidence that it is flat.

Title:

Content: "The Lost Earth Truth 1": The level of the earth seems to be the "gold rush" of our time.
Photo Credit: iStock
What we want you to know is
Through the multi-dimensional advanced high-tech "heterogeneous meta-helmet", scientists learned that the earth is full of four-dimensional entrances, the third dimension of the material plane and the fourth dimension of the etheric plane are originally "twins".
Written by Radu Cinama
Tiping said it was the "gold rush" of this era.
Based on a reference to the House of the Cabal, which hides the door to multidimensional interaction, I found an informative note that I had never seen before, floating among dozens of notes on my desk.
In general, I prefer to work in electronic form or wait for notes or files in digital format, but given my particular interest in the Dimension Portal, I decided to check everything on my desk, including the latest events.
I do not know the reasons and methods, but the information I found was ignored.
After reviewing notes and data summaries, I discovered an event called “Ground Floor – References ”, a“ movement ” that I ’ ve heard has made waves among people, but I never thought it would become a theme for our department.
The illusion of this idea is obvious, especially for those who have good judgment and personal experience of our planet from the perspective of outer space.
I was a bit confused and didn ’ t know if I should read a few pages of summaries about the ground floor.
I went to Lieutenant Nikola and asked him about it.
He told me that the information came from the operations department of another SRI division, an acronym for the Romanian Intelligence Agency, which has the status of a second level notice.
The lieutenant made it clear that the only reason this information reached our department was because it triggered an abnormal "phenomenon" in the world, but in our country, the number of "followers" is relatively small and the proportion is reasonable, and the level seems to be the "gold rush" of our time. It makes you speechless, even in a state of “shock. ”
I can understand that the paranoia and other obscure interests of hundreds of years ago amplify the lack of knowledge, which may occupy the minds of a relatively small number of people, but it is unreasonable to allow it to develop to the level of the international movement of the 21st century.
From a heavenly point of view, I wonder if human stupidity can rise above that level, but I don ’ t quite believe in that prospect.
However, even the most bizarre phenomena must be taken into account, at least taking into account the crowd and their opinions, which is one of the Secret Service's tasks.
I did read the summary, which revealed the main points of the problem very clearly, but did not give any conclusions.
Severe retrogression into the Middle Ages
On the same night, I took advantage of Cesar ’ s free time and shared the ground level problem with him, more as a social case than a research direction.
Cesar laughed loudly, talked about the topic for a while, and then suddenly turned to some very interesting questions.
He told me that three or four years ago, the issue was introduced to him and discussed with other colleagues in the intelligence department because there were signs that the idea was trending toward a consensus.
Out of respect for readers, I don ’ t usually include such a discussion in my series.
It requires only a little wisdom and minimal scientific training to understand, and arguments in support of this theory are tantamount to ignorance and fanaticism.
Beyond this, however, Cesar reveals some psychological cues that seem to be of some importance to general knowledge and social experience.
When discussing topping with Cesar, the first point involves a large number of followers.
“The mechanism for this strange theory of increased follower numbers is related to human isolation, ” says Cesar.
“It ’ s as if the population is divided into two distinct categories, but this separation is actually based on each person ’ s level of consciousness, which is directly related to their vibration frequency. ”
“But, ” I replied,“ I don ’ t know what caused this outbreak, and more and more people are insisting on these ‘ arguments ’ without meaning. ”
It's more like a stupid virus. "
“This major shift in thinking patterns is not at the same wavelength as what is commonly understood in the world today.
In other words, such new ideas have nothing to do with the knowledge of our time.
This is an effective method, because the earth is flat, and the idea is strongly supported by mystical factors, as well as by those who are keen to see things stagnant and not progressing.
This is the best way to control it: take people away from reality, let them dream nonsense, support their fantasies, and encourage them to project.
Therefore, it is controlled by imposing on the masses what they want.
Followers of earth thought, firmly believing in it, will seek to meet others, gather, and even separate themselves from others, because they will see others as fools deceived by lies.
In other words, they will be convinced that they are the ones who “discovered ” the truth. While it is sad to hear the news, unfortunately, the situation is quite real. ”
“Although I have this report under my nose, I can ’ t believe it has reached this point.
I feel like this is an ugly dream, as if some people in the world have voluntarily gone back hundreds of years.
That's how I feel.
Incredibly, people ’ s minds today are still influenced by delusions that defy not only decent intelligence but also scientific reasoning, making everything frenzied.
Look at the results! ”
I showed Cesar ’ s estimated numbers and charts.
"I know.
We've talked to other colleagues, "he said.
“Your surprise is evidenced by the huge difference in conceptualization and vibration frequency that people are beginning to feel.
This is a reality that has become increasingly prominent over time and cannot be ignored.
This is part of the isolation I told you about.
In principle, people interact with those who are evolving and those who prefer to stay in purely physical, crude or involuntary groups.
Those in the first category perfect themselves, recognize the changes that are taking place on Earth, and experience certain emotional states and specific sensations.
That ’ s why it ’ s incredible for some people to think about problems in a medieval way, such as followers of the Earth Theory. ”
Cesar saw the astonishment on my face and hurried to prove what he said again.
“Yes, I ’ m not exaggerating.
This is a return to the Middle Ages, because these people cannot evolve; instead, they return to a more archaic state of consciousness, closer to their true level of consciousness. ”
“Why can ’ t they evolve? ” I asked in surprise.
Of course, I know the answer, but it ’ s always a pleasure to capture Cesar ’ s explanation.
In addition, there is always a new element that can enrich my knowledge.
“Because the current state of things they attract has nothing to do with the higher vibrations of the Earth, this feature is becoming more and more apparent. ”
“For the followers of the Earth Plane, their consolation lies in the frenzy of these primitive ideas, which are maintained as free spirits and ideas are blocked.
The same was true during the Inquisition: a set of foolish and erroneous ideas was raised into law, and any violation of those ideas was enforced. ”
When I think about it all, I hope I ’ m wrong.
“Are we back in the Middle Ages? History has set off a wave of extreme ideas.
Ancient people already knew that the earth was round, but the situation deteriorated in the Middle Ages, when there was a revival of modern science, but was this only to take us back to the Middle Ages now? ” (The author undoubtedly refers to the knowledge shared by Pythagoras and Aristotle, who both asserted that the earth is round, and the argument made by Eratonius in ancient Alexandria.)
Cesar calmly replied, “We don ’ t; but for the part that has degraded, yes. ”
Several factors contributed to this.
Followers of the Earth ’ s theory are indignant at their opinionated views, their refusal to think logically or rationally on the basis of real arguments and evidence, their denial of evidence, and their deceitful defense of their position.
In general, this is a kind of missionary covering up fanaticism.
The psychological factor of the earth level, the mind pulls people's distance
We note that whenever fanaticism prevails, society is confronted with a lack of insight and the limitations of personal freedom.
Cesar gave me an example that better explains how this dilemma can be achieved in the context of a relatively developed civilization.
"This phenomenon is the same as in quantum physics.
If there is enough energy, the electrons can jump into higher orbits.
If there is not enough energy, it can be kept at a slightly higher level and relatively stable; but at some point, the remaining energy will be released in the form of photons, and the electron will return to the orbit where it was originally found, back to where it started.
In quantum physics, this is the basic orbit of electrons.
In other words, electrons with these characteristics will return to the level where they have a safe orbit. ” I interjected, clinging to the subject.
“I know that throughout human history, the idea that the earth is flat has long existed in some religions.
Modern astronomy has developed extensively since then.
Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto have only been discovered for about two hundred years.
In this sense, the ground floor is actually not very old, its memory is still fresh.
Perhaps that is why some humans return to the state they once knew. "
“This is another factor, ” Cesar acknowledged,“ in any case, human society is changing from ‘ possessiveness ’ to ‘ feeling ’, that sense of possession, egoism, competition, and violence tends to be gradually replaced by pure and positive emotions and feelings, which are fundamental to love, altruism, and compassion. ”
I have some doubts.
“It ’ s hard to believe, because almost all of us are seeing the spread of these negative manifestations. ”
“At first glance, it might be so.
Remember, however, that most people on Earth are uneducated, and they ‘ resort ’ to this illusion of competition, money, commerce, and lack of spirituality.
A large number of people who are addicted to this dream, tend to oppose those who are guided only by spiritual values and seek a pure life with a clear meaning, and have achieved a balance at this point.
This is what we call isolation. "
In fact, what Cesar wanted to say is that everyone is invited to participate in the great spiritual transformation of humanity and our planet, with the desire and dignity to demand that his life be the germ of light, spirituality and hope that we can enter a bright future.
This is an excellent ideal, but so far too few people have followed this ideal.
Book Introduction
This excerpt is from The Lost Earth Truth 1: The Hidden History of Holographic Time Travel, published by Daxi Culture.
Written by Radu Cinamar
Translated by: Sandra
• momo online bookstore
• Enter TNL83 at Pubu E-Bookstore checkout to enjoy 83% off sitewide (excluding some items, such as physical, adult and designated items, cannot be combined with other offers)
• If you purchase the book through the links above, Key Review Network will receive a score profit from it.
Radu Cinamar became famous after revealing an unprecedented and mysterious collaboration between the US and Romanian militaries.
American and Romanian troops have made an expedition under the Romanian Sphinx in the Bucegi Mountains and discovered the greatest archaeological discovery of all time: a mysterious chamber about 50,000 years old, containing a holographic record of human history of the Earth, biological resonance imaging technology, and three mysterious tunnels that lead to secrets deep in the heart of the earth.
Despite the political intrigue, confusion, and restrictions surrounding this great discovery, the expedition leader allowed Radu Sinamar to visit and explore the artifacts.
Since then, Radu ’ s life has been a labyrinthine adventure, filled with strange events, secret connections, and unusual people and things.
This book delves into ancient history in an unprecedented way, through the interaction of advanced technology ’ s “heterogeneous helmets ” with the author ’ s cerebral cortex and intuition, presenting more than 70 stunning images of the scene, the result of which is holographic projection, explaining and illustrating the DNA changes that took place over thousands of years and how humans evolved into what they are today.
Reveals the mystery of how multiple alien civilizations influenced and guided human DNA to evolve to a higher level.
Some of the hot spots in human history, which in the past either remained unknown or were only considered from a mythological point of view, include: Atlantis, Troy, Shambhala, and Huppelburia.
Disrupting the myths of the past, this book provides rich and accurate communications from the actual scene of holographic technology, combining esoteric knowledge and some scientific factors.
Special emphasis is placed on the "intersection" between the physical dimension and the etheric dimension and on the cracks or entrances between the dimensions.
In addition to revealing the ancient history of mankind, this fascinating work also describes a time out to see the origins of humanity and its hope for the future.
Book Features
Time-lapse decoding! The beginning of important human change
Through the multi-dimensional advanced high-tech "heterogeneous meta-helmet", scientists learned that the earth is full of four-dimensional entrances, the third dimension of the material plane and the fourth dimension of the etheric plane are originally "twins".
And you can see the "cosmic record" in the holographic image!
You can also overlook the cross-section of the earth, covering the deep human genetic technology and high-dimensional cosmic civilization, and no book in its amazing history has been exposed so far!
Editor-in-Chief: Weng Shihang
Editor-in-chief: Bohan Pan
Tags:

However, these arguments have been thoroughly debunked by scientific evidence, including satellite imagery and measurements of the Earth's curvature.

What scientific evidence do "flat earthers" reject?

Despite the lack of scientific evidence to support the flat Earth theory, many people continue to believe in it, often citing conspiracy theories about governments and other organizations covering up the "truth" about the Earth's shape.

The resurgence of the flat Earth movement in the modern era can be attributed to a combination of factors, including the rise of social media and the proliferation of misinformation online.

Social media platforms have created an environment in which conspiracy theories can spread quickly and easily, often without being subject to fact-checking or scrutiny.

Additionally, the flat Earth movement has been promoted by various public figures and celebrities, including some who have large followings on social media.

Title:

Content: Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?

If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

  Satanic Church installs statue of Baphomet next to Nativity in Illinois State Capitol. Naturally, the Catholic Bishop is outraged, because main tenets of the CoS are to never harm children and sex is only okay when consensual   (yahoo.com)
    More: Ironic, Christmas, United States Capitol, Satanic Temple, year's display, third year, Sunday, Springfield, Illinois, satanic holiday
•       •       •

1236 clicks; posted to Main » on 21 Dec 2021 at 1:19 PM (1 hour ago)   |   Favorite   |   Watch    |   share:

55 Comments     (+0 »)
Log in (at the top of the page) to enable voting.
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

should have no place in this Capitol

He is so close to getting it, so close.

I love how Jesus be comin' into people right and left, but the Devil needs consent to enter.

I love the Satanic Temple

labman: I love the Satanic Temple

The Playboy Foundation used to fight for our first amendment rights. Now, it seems the Satanic Temple has taken over the fight. More power to 'em!

Hey, Christians: If a government facility allows holiday symbols of one religion, they should be required to allow any others that want to do likewise. Shut up and deal with it. Or resign yourselves to not doing a display on government property.

/Presbyterian

Cafe Threads: labman: I love the Satanic Temple

The Playboy Foundation used to fight for our first amendment rights. Now, it seems the Satanic Temple has taken over the fight. More power to 'em!

The Freedom From Religion Foundation does some good work, too. Looking for a last minute Christmas Gift for your God bothering friends and relatives? Sponsor a membership for them!

https://ffrf.org/

Squid_for_Brains: I love how Jesus be comin' into people right and left, but the Devil needs consent to enter.

And even when Jesus does bother to ask for permission, well...

Satanic Temple and Church of Satan are different orgs.

Satanic Temple are atheists pushing for separation of church and state.

Church of Satan are Randians...

Did Yahoo disable comments on their site? That used to be the only reason to ever click on a yahoo news article. To lol at the rubes...

#OnlyFair

Satan is pretty farking cool.

From all the stories I have read about them they seem like really chill folks.

Not to mention the time they schooled Megyn Kelly about the law. I loved that video but can't find it.

HURR DURR DURR

/finger up nose

swaniefrmreddeer: should have no place in this Capitol

He is so close to getting it, so close.

Yep. Unfortunately he's likely just saying it because he's opposed to TST's message and/or thinks that his faith has exclusivity rights on winter festivals despite the fact that such festivals existed centuries before a random carpenter's child bride had to figure out a way to explain why she was pregnant despite never having consummated the marriage.

I envisioned this as I was reading:

Then this:

Bertuccio: Satanic Temple and Church of Satan are different orgs.

Satanic Temple are atheists pushing for separation of church and state.

Church of Satan are Randians...

It's like the flat Earth people.
There are flat Earth people who know Earth isn't flat, but are making a point. Or a joke. Or even just like attention.
Then there are flat Earth people who think the Earth is flat.

Hail the goat ya'll

jaivirtualcard: From all the stories I have read about them they seem like really chill folks.

Not to mention the time they schooled Megyn Kelly about the law. I loved that video but can't find it.

Megyn Kelly Talks To Smart-Ass, One-Eyed Satanist "Lucien" Greaves

Ah, Springfield, Illinois, the town I was born and grew up in. I left for good when I was 18, that was about 18 years too late.

I've travelled all over the US since then, and rarely seen a town so beknighted. You'd think the state capitol would have a certain amount of sophistication and cosmopolitanism. Unfortunately, you'd be wrong.

Jake Havechek: Satan is pretty farking cool.

Well yeah - the one who wanted Adam and Steve to have knowledge?  Ovby the BAD guy according to the church.

vilesithknight: Did Yahoo disable comments on their site? That used to be the only reason to ever click on a yahoo news article. To lol at the rubes...

Only on some articles.  Non-controversial articles have comments, nope on controversial ones.

The Satanic Temple is also fighting anti-abortion laws in TX and elsewhere by invoking the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Satanists believe in complete bodily autonomy.

Now we need a display from the Sex Temple.

I bet he thinks being a bishop is pretty special too.

Guy can only move diagonally. Loser.

Damn that Sol Invictus. He's the reason shabbos got moved from Friday to Sunday.

/don't roll on shabbos

Presbyterian pastor here, chiming in, and I'm fine with Baphomet being there if the nativity scene is there.
But honestly, none of it should be there. Put that shiat in your meeting places, not on government property.

SOL INVICTUS!

Got nothing of than a good laugh from what the Bishop spluttered, and I'm Irish Catholic.

PirateKing: I bet he thinks being a bishop is pretty special too.

Guy can only move diagonally. Loser.

RaptorLC: swaniefrmreddeer: should have no place in this Capitol

He is so close to getting it, so close.

Yep. Unfortunately he's likely just saying it because he's opposed to TST's message and/or thinks that his faith has exclusivity rights on winter festivals despite the fact that such festivals existed centuries before a random carpenter's child bride had to figure out a way to explain why she was pregnant despite never having consummated the marriage.

pregnant at 12

/her body is reddy...

Cute. They should really consider selling Baby Baphomet ornaments. I think they'd make bank.

Squid_for_Brains: I love how Jesus be comin' into people right and left, but the Devil needs consent to enter.

i mean duh. If of course we assume the point of the devil is to in fact be evil.
So what's more evil sounding?

that you physical over power someone to force on them what they do not want.
or
that you manipulate them into believing they want that and actually asking for it themselves, thus giving consent, when they will ultimately regret this later, becasue they were just manipulated into believing they did want this by someone with more intellectual horse power to exploit them with then they had to defend themselves from such exploitation.

And so under those conditions, used such power, not for the uplift and protection of the weak, but to better exploit them.

I'd say that for sure sound like the path of greater evil, at least to me anyway.
And so makes more sense to be the teachings of the supernatural figure intended to represent evil.

RaptorLC: swaniefrmreddeer: should have no place in this Capitol

He is so close to getting it, so close.

Yep. Unfortunately he's likely just saying it because he's opposed to TST's message and/or thinks that his faith has exclusivity rights on winter festivals despite the fact that such festivals existed centuries before a random carpenter's child bride had to figure out a way to explain why she was pregnant despite never having consummated the marriage.

Jake Havechek: [Fark user image 425x239]

The Satanist should run, he's staring at the face of true evil....

Bertuccio: Satanic Temple and Church of Satan are different orgs.

Satanic Temple are atheists pushing for separation of church and state.

Church of Satan are Randians...

And both are more honorable and noble than republicans.

There's one video from O'Reilly interviewing this lady from either Church of Satan or the Satanic Temple, I can't remember which, but O'Reilly gets visibly scared even though they're not in the same studio.

Bertuccio: Satanic Temple and Church of Satan are different orgs.

Satanic Temple are atheists pushing for separation of church and state.

Church of Satan are Randians...

They do agree on the bits about consent and not hurting children.

guestguy: [Fark user image image 213x237]

Jake Havechek: Satan is pretty farking cool.

Cake - Satan Is My Motor

A Cave Geek: Bertuccio: Satanic Temple and Church of Satan are different orgs.

Satanic Temple are atheists pushing for separation of church and state.

Church of Satan are Randians...

And both are more honorable and noble than republicans.

Randians are never noble.

Mötley Crüe - God Bless The Children Of The Beast

Squid_for_Brains: I love how Jesus be comin' into people right and left, but the Devil needs consent to enter.

That's why we prefer Satan. He always asks: Can I cum inside?

My idol is more important that your idol!

Ivo Shandor: Bertuccio: Satanic Temple and Church of Satan are different orgs.

Satanic Temple are atheists pushing for separation of church and state.

Church of Satan are Randians...

They do agree on the bits about consent and not hurting children.

tansa: Looking for a last minute Christmas Gift for your God bothering friends and relatives? Sponsor a membership for them!

https://ffrf.org/

Forget Capitol City.
Do something about this monstrosity in Effingham.
Just don't burn it, they might like it there.

"As Satanic Temple members installed the display Monday, the American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property Poverty recited the rosary next to the Nativity scene."

Oh he has a problem with that?

Well I have a problem with real evil, ffs.
Aljazeera: priest jailed for 12 years for sex abuse of minors in East Timor

So how about STFU until there are no more priest abusing kids.

Displayed 50 of 55 comments

Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

Log in (at the top of the page) to enable voting.
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

If you're having problems voting, quoting, or posting comments, try disabling any browser add-ons that might disable Javascript (NoScript, AdBlock, etc). See our FAQ.

   Forgot password? Create an account to make comments
  Obsolete HTML Buttons
If you can see this, something's wrong with your browser's CSS support. (Or you're a spambot.)

Before adding a comment, please take a minute to review our posting rules and our legal/privacy policy.
By commenting, you agree to these terms. You might also want to take a look at our FAQ.

On Twitter

  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Click here to submit a link.

The characteristics of people who are most likely to subscribe to flat Earth beliefs include a lack of trust in scientific institutions and a tendency to rely on unverifiable sources of information.

According to the study by the University of New Hampshire, younger generations, such as millennials and Gen Z, are more likely to believe in conspiracy theories, including the flat Earth theory.

This may be due to a lack of exposure to scientific evidence and a greater reliance on social media for information.

Overall, the flat Earth movement is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that reflects a broader distrust of scientific institutions and a lack of critical thinking in the internet era.

The movement is characterized by a rejection of scientific evidence and a reliance on unverifiable sources of information, and its proponents often use flawed arguments to support their claims.

Despite the lack of scientific evidence to support the flat Earth theory, it continues to be promoted by various organizations and individuals, often using social media platforms to spread misinformation.

It is essential to address the root causes of the flat Earth movement, including the lack of trust in scientific institutions and the proliferation of misinformation online.

By promoting critical thinking and scientific literacy, we can work to combat the spread of conspiracy theories and promote a more informed and nuanced understanding of the world.


Disney has been producing live-action remakes of their animated classics in recent years, with films such as Cinderella (2015), The Jungle Book (2016), Beauty and the Beast (2017), Dumbo (2019), Aladdin (2019), The Lion King (2019), Mulan (2020), Pinocchio (2022), and Little Mermaid (2023).

The company's decision to produce these remakes is driven by nostalgia, as well as the desire to update the stories and characters for contemporary audiences.

Nostalgia plays a significant role in driving Disney's decisions, as the company aims to tap into the fond memories of older audiences who grew up with the original animated films.

The live-action remakes often feature changes to the original stories and characters, such as updated plotlines, new characters, and more diverse casting.

For example, the live-action remake of The Little Mermaid features a more diverse cast, with Halle Bailey playing the role of Ariel.

The public reaction to the adaptations has been mixed, with some fans praising the updates and others criticizing the changes to the original stories and characters.

According to John Musk, the director of the original Little Mermaid, Disney should focus on creating characters that audiences can empathize with, rather than prioritizing "political correctness".

Overall, Disney's live-action remakes of their animated classics are a way for the company to revisit and reimagining their beloved stories for new audiences, while also tapping into the nostalgia of older fans.

Disney has been producing live-action remakes of their animated classics in recent years, with films such as Cinderella (2015), The Jungle Book (2016), Beauty and the Beast (2017), Dumbo (2019), Aladdin (2019), The Lion King (2019), Mulan (2020), Pinocchio (2022), and Little Mermaid (2023).

Title:

Content: Skip to Content

A Definitive List of All the Disney Live-Action Films

From Halle Bailey’s Little Mermaid to the live-action Moana to sequels galore.

By Delia Paunescu and Amy Mackelden

Most of us grew up watching Disney movies, and for better or worse, we wondered what it might be like to be a Disney princess. In recent years, Disney has cleverly played into that nostalgia by transforming its classic animations into live-action movies filled with some of Hollywood’s biggest stars. Following the success of big-budget adaptations like Beauty and the Beast and The Lion King, Disney has committed to turning the majority of its animated catalog into cinematic treats. From Angelina Jolie’s star turn in Maleficent to the upcoming live-action version of Moana, fans will be spoiled for choice. Here, we round up all of Disney’s live-action movie adaptations to date, as well as some of the rumors about what’s to come.

1

Maleficent (2014)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
Disney's Maleficent - Official Trailer 3
Watch on

Loosely based on Sleeping Beauty, Angelina Jolie’s wicked witch arrived when lots of evil queens were getting their own feature films (Remember Charlize Theron in Snow White and the Huntsman?). Elle Fanning’s turn as Princess Aurora put her on the map as an A-lister to watch. The film even launched a Maleficent makeup collaboration with M.A.C., which we adored.

WATCH ON PRIME VIDEO

2

Cinderella (2015)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
Disney's Cinderella Official US Trailer
Watch on

Disney’s dreamy live action remake of Cinderella cast Cate Blanchett as the evil stepmother, with Bodyguard star Richard Madden playing the Prince. When she landed the title role, Lily James’ most significant part had been as a rebellious cousin on Downton Abbey. Naturally, the fairytale brought James worldwide recognition (and she went on to play young Meryl Streep in Mamma Mia 2).

WATCH ON PRIME VIDEO

3

The Jungle Book (2016)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
The Jungle Book Official Big Game Trailer
Watch on

The original Jungle Book features some of the best music in Disney’s catalog, so director Jon Favreau’s 2016 live-action remake had a lot to live up to. Newcomer Neel Sethi masterfully took on the part of the boy trying to stay alive with a vengeful Shere Khan hunting him down.

A sequel has reportedly been in the works since Jungle Book was released, with Favreau rumored to be returning as director, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

WATCH ON DISNEY+ WATCH ON PRIME VIDEO

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
4

Beauty and the Beast (2017)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
Beauty and the Beast – US Official Final Trailer
Watch on

Few Disney remakes were more anticipated than Beauty and the Beast. It was lavish in its production, starring Emma Watson as Belle and Dan Stevens as an all-too-human Beast. Supporting cast members like Stanley Tucci, Emma Thompson, Audra McDonald, and Ewan McGregor were exceptional as the castle staff.

WATCH ON PRIME VIDEO WATCH ON DISNEY+

5

Christopher Robin (2018)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
Christopher Robin Official Trailer
Watch on

Honestly, it feels like this movie came and went without anyone, besides die-hard Winnie the Pooh fans, paying much attention. It’s a shame, really, because Ewan McGregor is endearing in the grown-up title role and the Hundred Acre Woods’ animal pals are as warmly fuzzy as you’d hope.

WATCH ON PRIME VIDEO WATCH ON DISNEY+

6

Mary Poppins Returns (2018)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
Mary Poppins Returns | Official Trailer
Watch on

Emily Blunt steps into Julie Andrews’ cape and brings the magical nanny to life once more. The Devil Wears Prada darling did a terrific job, and was nominated for a Golden Globe as a result. Anyone who grew up loving the cheerily psychedelic musical numbers is bound to appreciate Hamilton star Lin-Manuel Miranda as lamplighter Jack. As if Mary Poppins Returns couldn't get any better, Meryl Streep, Dick Van Dyke, Julie Walters, and Angela Lansbury are also all in the film.

WATCH ON DISNEY+ WATCH ON AMAZON PRIME

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
7

Dumbo (2019)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
Dumbo Official Trailer
Watch on

Dumbo remains one of the most upsetting stories in Disney’s roster, and 2019’s live-action remake will give you all of the feels. Directed by Tim Burton and starring Colin Farrell, Michael Keaton, and Danny DeVito, Dumbo re-tells the emotional story of a young elephant with the gift of flight, who finds himself embroiled in some circus drama.

WATCH ON PRIME VIDEO WATCH ON DISNEY+

8

Aladdin (2019)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
Disney's Aladdin - "Connection" TV Spot
Watch on

Fans were desperate to find out who had been cast in the live-action Aladdin, no doubt because the original movie is so beloved. While Mena Massoud took on the title role, Power Rangers star Naomi Scott transformed into Princess Jasmine. And of course, Will freaking Smith did his very best to fill Robin Williams’ iconic lamp as the Genie.

In 2020, it was revealed that a sequel is in the works, via Deadline. Plus, a spin-off featuring Prince Anders is also in development.

WATCH ON PRIME VIDEO WATCH ON DISNEY+

9

The Lion King (2019)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
The Lion King Official Trailer
Watch on

The all-star remake of The Lion King might be the most important thing the house of the mouse has done since they released the original Lion King in 1994. This live-action version cast none other than Beyoncé herself as Nala. She stars alongside Donald Glover as Simba, and Billy Eichner and Seth Rogen as Timon and Pumbaa, with James Earl Jones reprising his original role as Mufasa. A sequel (or prequel) is on the way.

WATCH ON PRIME VIDEO WATCH ON DISNEY+

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
10

Maleficent: Mistress of Evil (2019)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
MALEFICENT 2: MISTRESS OF EVIL Official Trailer #2 (2019) Angelina Jolie, Disney Movie HD
Watch on

Angela Jolie and Elle Fanning returned for the follow-up to 2014’s Maleficent. Jolie’s character continues to wrestle with people’s perception of her as a villain, while Princess Aurora receives a marriage proposal, much to Maleficent’s chagrin. Meanwhile, an endangered species known as the Dark Fae start to rise up.

WATCH ON DISNEY+

11

Lady and the Tramp (2019)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
Lady and the Tramp | Official Trailer | Disney+ | Streaming November 12
Watch on

1955’s canine couple du jour were given a live-action/animation hybrid update, which debuted on Disney+ in 2019. Justin Theroux voiced the scampy Tramp and Tessa Thompson played the elegant Lady in this animal romance. Thompson’s BFF Janelle Monáe, and Kiersey Clemons round out the cast of this cute remake.

WATCH ON DISNEY+

12

Mulan (2020)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
Disney's Mulan | Official Trailer
Watch on

Disney casting directors had their job cut out for them with Mulan, reportedly spending a year auditioning nearly 1,000 actresses for the lead. The part ultimately went to Chinese superstar Liu Yifei. Fans finally saw the 31-year-old in full character thanks to this arresting first image. Director Niki Caro told the Hollywood Reporter: “It’s a big, girly martial arts epic. It will be extremely muscular and thrilling and entertaining and moving.” What more do you need to know?

WATCH ON DISNEY+ WATCH ON PRIME VIDEO

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
13

Cruella (2021)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
Disney's Cruella | Official Trailer
Watch on

Anyone else think Cruella was woefully misunderstood? Enter 2021’s Cruella, which tells the story of 101 Dalmatians’ villainous diva before she became, well, fully evil. The inimitable Emma Stone won the lead role, infusing the tale with ’80s punk chic. From the eye-catching costumes to the super cute puppies, Disney’s origin story has everything. A sequel is reportedly in the works.

WATCH ON DISNEY+ WATCH ON PRIME VIDEO

14

Pinocchio (2022)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
Pinocchio Trailer #2 (2022)
Watch on

Tom Hanks as Geppetto? Say no more. It may be 80 years later, but this live-action remake is just as relevant today as the original was upon its release. Joseph Gordon-Levitt gives a heartfelt performance as Jiminy Cricket, and Pinnochio’s journey to becoming a real boy is brought to life in stunning visuals.

WATCH ON DISNEY+

15

Peter Pan & Wendy (2023)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
Peter Pan & Wendy | Official Trailer | Disney+
Watch on

There have been numerous adaptations of J. M. Barrie’s iconic story, but Disney promises to delight fans of its 1953 animated classic with the live-action Peter Pan & Wendy. After meeting Peter Pan, Wendy (Ever Anderson) embarks on an adventure to Neverland, where she faces up to Captain Hook. A story that truly never gets old.

WATCH ON DISNEY+

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
16

The Little Mermaid (2023)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
The Little Mermaid | Official Trailer
Watch on

Ariel’s story of thirst-trapping Prince Eric, after selling her voice to that glorious diva Ursula in exchange for human legs, is ripe for a remake, especially given the 1998 original’s fishy gender dynamics. Halle Bailey wows in the lead role, with Melissa McCarthy embodying sea witch Ursula. Lin-Manuel Miranda wrote new songs for the flick, alongside Disney musical genius Alan Menken.

The Little Mermaid hits theaters on May 26, 2023.

WATCH THE ORIGINAL ON DISNEY+

17

Snow White (2024)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
Rachel Zegler and Gal Gadot on 'Snow White' | D23 2022 | Entertainment Weekly
Watch on

Disney is bringing its live-action magic to 1937 animation Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. While Rachel Zegler will take the lead as Snow White, Gal Gadot has been cast as the Evil Queen. With Greta Gerwig tapped to write the screenplay, we can expect Snow White to be all kinds of wonderful.

Snow White is set to hit theaters on March 22, 2024, per Deadline.

WATCH THE ORIGINAL ON DISNEY+

18

Moana (TBD)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
Live-Action Moana Announcement
Watch on

In April 2023, it was announced that Moana (which was just released in 2016) would be getting the live-action treatment, with Dwayne Johnson reprising his role as demigod Maui. The original voice of Moana, Auli‘i Cravalho, has signed on as an executive producer. Johnson said in a statement, “This story is my culture, and this story is emblematic of our people’s grace and warrior strength.” The release date is currently unknown.

WATCH THE ORIGINAL ON DISNEY+

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
19

Lilo & Stitch (TBD)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
Lilo & Stitch (2002) Trailer #1 | Movieclips Classic Trailers
Watch on

A live-action/CG hybrid remake of the supremely adorable 2002 film about a Hawaiian girl and the alien who befriends her was first announced in October 2018. It is being produced by Dan Lin and Jonathan Eirich, who were also tasked with the Aladdin remake. A release date is up in the air but it’s possible this will debut on Disney’s upcoming streaming service. The cast includes Zach Galifianakis, Courtney B. Vance, and newcomer Maia Kealoha as Lilo, per The Hollywood Reporter.

WATCH THE ORIGINAL ON DISNEY+

20

Hercules (TBD)

This content is imported from youTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
1997 Hercules Official Trailer 1 Walt Disney Pictures
Watch on

In June 2022, Deadline reported that Aladdin director Guy Ritchie had signed on to direct the live-action remake of Hercules. The 1997 animate feature retold the legend of demigod Hercules, who was voiced by Tate Donovan. While details on the remake remain scarce, Hercules is certainly one to watch for Disney fans.

WATCH THE ORIGINAL ON DISNEY+

Delia Paunescu

Delia Paunescu is a writer, producer, and social media consultant based in New York City. She's written for Vulture, Racked, Brooklyn Magazine, New York Post, and amNewYork, among others. Delia also spent two years leading NowThis Entertainment. She'd very much like to shout at you about why Jane the Virgin is the greatest show of all time over on Twitter.

Amy Mackelden is a freelance writer, editor, and disability activist. Her bylines include Harper's BAZAAR, Nicki Swift, Cosmopolitan, Marie Claire, ELLE, The Independent, Bustle, Healthline, and HelloGiggles. She co-edited The Emma Press Anthology of Illness, and previously spent all of her money on Kylie Cosmetics.

Watch Next

Movies & TV 2023

Priya Kansara Went From Health Care to Hollywood

What We Know About 'Red, White & Royal Blue'

Cara Delevingne Joins Kim Kardashian in 'AHS'

Melissa Barrera Knows What She Wants

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

A Part of Hearst Digital Media

We may earn commission from links on this page, but we only recommend products we back.

©Hearst Magazine Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy NoticeCA Notice at CollectionYour CA Privacy Rights/Shine the LightDAA Industry Opt OutTerms of UseSite Map

How has Disney leveraged nostalgia in recent years?

By turning classic animations into live-action films with major stars

The company's decision to produce these remakes is driven by nostalgia, as well as the desire to update the stories and characters for contemporary audiences.

Title:

Content: Watch movies for $1
Alerts from Kinoafisha
Soon at the box office of Claustrophobes.
Valley of the Devil 1
We remind you about the release of your favorite premieres and main news directly in the browser!
Menus
Your tickets in your personal account
Back to the old: 9 Disney game remakes that are in development right now
As practice shows, nostalgia sells well.
At the moment, Disney is developing a lot of animated remakes, including with live actors.
This is not surprising given the success of the recent rework of their classic animated films.
It seems that Disney will continue to explore the genre and offer unique interpretations of favorite projects.
Peter Pan and Wendy
Release date: 2022
The remake of the new “Peter Pan ” was directed by David Lowry, who previously worked on the film adaptation of“ Pete and his dragon ” in 2016.
It is reported that the shooting of the project has already been completed, but the exact date has not yet been announced.
It is known that the basis of the film “Peter Pan and Wendy ” is the original story about a boy who did not want to become an adult, and the magical country of Neverland.
The exact date of the premiere of the project has not yet been announced, but is expected in the second half of 2022.
Pinocchio
Release date: September 8, 2022
The animated film “Pinocchio ” with live action was shot by Robert Zemeckis according to his own script in collaboration with Chris Weitz.
The Wooden Boy was originally voiced by Benjamin Evan Ainsworth.
Its creator, Gepetto, was played by Tom Hanks.
Also in the remake took part Cynthia Erivo, Luke Evans and others.
The premiere of the fantasy musical is scheduled for September 8, 2022.
Not only Disney: 8 amazing cartoons that are worthy of a game remake
Little Mermaid
Release date: May 26, 2023
About the rethinking of the “Little Mermaid ” rumors have been around for a long time, and after the announcement of the actress for the main role, dark-skinned Holly Bailey, fierce disputes began.
Nevertheless, the film adaptation decided to finish and announced the premiere date - May 26, 2023.
The plot will tell the original story of a mermaid who fell in love with an earthly prince and asked the witch for legs to please him.
The beloved underwater princess in the film adaptation was played by actor John Hauer-King.
Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs
Release date: 2023
The exact date of the premiere of the remake of "Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs" has not yet been announced.
The story is taken from the fairy tale of the Brothers Grimm, and adapted by screenwriter Greta Gerwig.
The project is directed by Mark Webb.
The role of the beauty of Snow White will be played by Rachel Zegler, and the evil witch will be embodied on the screen by the vander woman Gal Gadot.
The premiere is expected presumably in 2023.
Hercules
Release date: not announced
The director of the film adaptation of “Hercules ” will be the author of“ Gentlemen ” Guy Ritchie.
He will direct a full-length film with live actors based on the 1997 cartoon.
The script was adapted by the author of “Shan-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings ” Dave Callham.
The cast of the film about the adventures of Hercules on Olympus has not yet been officially announced.
It is reported that the musical accompaniment of the picture will work Alan Mencken, the author of the compositions “The Little Mermaid ”,“ Aladdin ” and other cartoons.
Bambi
Release date: not announced
The film "Bambi" about a deer who is forced to learn to live independently in the forest after the death of his mother, will be created using computer technology.
The story is taken from the eponymous film adaptation of 1942.
Previously, similar technologies were used in the remake of The Lion King by John Favreau.
Genève Robertson-Dworet and Lindsay Beer will be scripted, and the director will be announced later.
The date of the premiere is not yet known.
Hunchback
Release date: not announced
Work began on a reimagining of the cartoon "Hunchback of Notre Dame" in 1996.
The story, taken as the basis of the original and remake, was written by Victor Hugo in the novel “Notre Dame de Paris ”.
The remake will be playable, but the cast has not yet been announced.
Also, the director ’ s chair is not yet occupied, and David Henry Hwang is already working on the script.
The date of the premiere has not yet been announced.
The Sword in the Stone
Release date: December 13, 2024
The 1963 film adaptation based on the legends of King Arthur will also receive a new adaptation.
Directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo.
The start of production of the new “Sword in the Stone ” started back in 2018, but due to financial problems it had to be suspended.
It is reported that due to the small budget of the picture, the project will be released exclusively for the Disney + streaming service.
There is no information yet about the actors who will take part in the film adaptation.
The project will be released on December 13, 2024.
Robin Hood
Release date: not announced
"Robin Hood" will get a hybrid version with live actors for the Disney + platform.
In development is a remake of the animated classic of 1976 with director Carlos Lopez Estrada at the head.
CGI technologies will be used in the project.
About the casting, the potential release date and other details are not yet known.
The script will be written by Kari Granlund, who previously worked on the remake of Lady and the Tramps.
Quality binge watching: the best HBO series Read more 20 July 2022
Life after Hogwarts: 14 roles, thanks to which Radcliffe ceased to be Harry Potter Read more 23 July 2022
Not only Disney: 8 stunning cartoons that are worthy of a game remake Read more 24 July 2022
Eyes on the forehead climb: 9 strange fan theories about "Twilight" Read more 23 July 2022
More than any psychotraining: 7 new inspiring films about finding yourself Read more 25 July 2022
Test: only a real superhero will guess 11 of the 11 Marvel movies in just one frame Read more 23 July 2022
Alexander Gorbatov shares a personal list of his favorite films and TV series specifically for the Movie poster Read more 25 July 2022
“Why did you bring me this freak ”: find out why these 12 popular actors were refused Read more 26 July 2022
Ivan Makarevich talks about the best series about love and about the Russian show, which is worth showing to the whole world Read more 25 July 2022
7 new films shot in mysterious St. Petersburg, which are worth watching Read more 24 July 2022
17 most viewed TV series of the first half of the year, which can already be found on the network Read more 25 July 2022
Related video

How has Disney leveraged nostalgia in recent years?

By turning classic animations into live-action films with major stars

Nostalgia plays a significant role in driving Disney's decisions, as the company aims to tap into the fond memories of older audiences who grew up with the original animated films.

How has Disney leveraged nostalgia in recent years?

By turning classic animations into live-action films with major stars

The live-action remakes often feature changes to the original stories and characters, such as updated plotlines, new characters, and more diverse casting.

How does Peter Pan and Wendy enhance inclusivity?

For example, the live-action remake of The Little Mermaid features a more diverse cast, with Halle Bailey playing the role of Ariel.

Title:

Content: It’s possible that being an only child was one reason I was not exposed to the phenomenon of Disney princess worship during my youth. On the other hand, the lack of a coordinated merchandising effort during the 1970s probably had much more to do with the fact that the company’s princess lineup wasn’t yet emerging as a cultural trend.

In that decade, Disney focused most of its marketing on the so-called “Sensational Six” core characters, including Mickey Mouse, Minnie Mouse, Pluto, Goofy, Donald Duck, and Daisy Duck; along with product tie-ins to the 1977’s “The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh.”

Of course, Disney had only made three princess movies up to that time. Those included 1937’s “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs,” 1950’s “Cinderella,” and 1959’s “Sleeping Beauty.” Following the introduction of Aurora in 1959, Disney would make moviegoers wait 30 years for the next princess to arrive in a film that would herald the start of the Disney Renaissance.

And that film was 1989’s “The Little Mermaid.”

Written and directed by John Musker and Ron Clements, the 28th Disney animated feature film was very loosely based on the 1837 Danish fairy tale of the same name by Hans Christian Andersen. It boasted a string of memorable songs that brought imbued the production with Broadway panache. Alan Menken wrote the score, and collaborated with Howard Ashman on the songs. The film scored three Academy Award nominations, winning two for Best Original Score and Best Original Song for “Under the Sea.”

The animated film featured the voices of Jodi Benson, Christopher Daniel Barnes, Pat Carroll, Samuel E. Wright, Jason Marin, Kenneth Mars, and Buddy Hackett.

Buoyed by the success of “The Little Mermaid,” the Disney Renaissance ran from the late 1980s to the late 1990s and unleashed a series of critically and commercially successful animated films. Of the 10 films considered part of this period, five were Disney princess films. By 2000, the list of Disney princess included Snow White, Cinderella, Aurora, Ariel, Belle, Jasmine, Pocahontas, and Mulan. Andy Mooney, a former Nike executive who had been named president of Walt Disney Company's Disney Consumer Products division, saw an opportunity. He pitched the Disney Princess franchise line — and a generation of children became entranced consumers.

More than 20 years have gone by since the end of the Disney Renaissance and the official launch of Disney’s Princess Line. These days, Walt Disney Pictures is focused on making live-action adaptations of its animated films. The latest of these is “The Little Mermaid,” directed by Rob Marshall from a screenplay written by David Magee. The film was released theatrically on May 26.

When evaluating a remake, adaptation, or reinterpretation of a classic film, one must consider not only the quality of the new film, but also how it compares to the original. It’s not enough to ask if the film entertaining and well executed. One must also determine what makes the remake valuable in its own right.

“The Little Mermaid” is set in the 1830s in the Caribbean. Ariel (Halle Bailey), youngest child of King Triton (Javier Bardem), lives in an underwater kingdom. Disney wisely mentions in its synopsis of the film that Ariel is 18 years old — not 16, as she was in the animated version.

Unlike her older sisters, Ariel is defiant and rebellious. She is captivated by a world beyond her reach, defying her father’s orders to study humans and collect their possessions from shipwrecks. She is often joined in this endeavor by her aquatic companions Flounder and Sebastian (voiced by Jacob Tremblay and Daveed Diggs, respectively); as well as by the birdbrained Scuttle (voiced by Awkwafina), a seabird whose understanding of human culture is amusingly erroneous.

When a sailing ship she has been watching is destroyed in a storm, she rescues Prince Eric (Jonah Hauer-King). When Triton learns Ariel interacted with the surface world, he goes on an overprotective father rampage, destroying her collection of bric-a-bracs, baubles, and curios while reiterating his mandate that she should not indulge her inclination to learn, explore, or meet new people. Ironically, Prince Eric’s adoptive mother, Queen Salina (Noma Dumezweni) places similar constraints upon him because she is fearful of the outside world and of losing her son.

Desperate to be reunited with Prince Eric — who she is in love with despite the fact that the two haven’t even actually met at this point — Ariel turns to Triton’s evil sister Ursula (Melissa McCarthy), a scheming sea witch who sees this as an opportunity to oust Triton and take power over all the world’s oceans. Ursula strikes a deal with Ariel, giving her legs in exchange for her voice. There’s a catch: If Ariel fails to receive true love’s kiss from Eric before the end of three days, she will become Ursula’s property. To make sure Ariel fails, Ursula also causes her to forget about needing to score that kiss.

That’s just the setup. If it seems a bit drawn out, imagine how it feels watching it on the screen. With a runtime of 2 hours and 15 minutes — 53 minutes longer than the 1989 animated version — it sometimes feels like we’re treading water. One wonders if, in a post-pandemic world filled with ADHD brains, kids can manage to maintain focus on this narrative that meanders its way from scene to scene without a sense of urgency. Sebastian and Flounder know that there is a looming deadline, but in this version of the story, Ariel has been robbed of that knowledge. In the animated version, she at least had a specific objective. She actively worked toward that goal. In this version, she is a starry-eyed young woman crushing on someone she barely knows, drifting dreamily between infatuation and limerence.

Because it is both a retelling of a classic fairy tale and a redesign of a beloved Disney property, the film suffers from a pronounced scarcity of creativity and originality. There are updates to the story, changes in individual characters, and a few additional songs. Some of these facelifts work, such as the addition of Queen Salina. Some of these addendum fall flat, such as Eric’s song “Wild Uncharted Waters,” written by Lin-Manuel Miranda. Miranda’s song “The Scuttlebutt,” performed by Awkwafina and Diggs, is a more palatable add-on, despite that fact that it is jarringly different tonally from other music in the film.

All the film’s flaws and miscalculations can be forgiven by its most impressive saving grace: Bailey’s performance is as remarkable as it is enchanting. Bailey stands out again and again in the murky, sketchy CGI undersea sequences, glowing with charisma and agency. She brings the magic that is noticeably lacking in elsewhere in the film, balancing the nostalgia of childhood memories with a contemporary attitude. She carries this film on her shoulders, filling it with a sense of wonder and awe that will inspire children to seek out unexplored horizons and work toward achieving their dreams.

Mind you: I’d prefer Ariel did not have to literally transform — for a man — to be deemed successful. This version somewhat mitigates that theme. Personal transformation is fine when prompted by a desire to become a better person, while self-change enacted strictly to please an individual or a group is unwise and unhealthy.

The film also features recurring examples — both subtle and palpable — that show gender equity, diversity, and inclusivity are beneficial to society. These are the very same principled concepts extremist legislators and ultraconservative judicial officials currently vilify as “woke,” as if being socially aware, compassionate, and empathetic has somehow become objectionable. If you ascribe to that mindset, you should probably skip this movie.

The bottom line is “The Little Mermaid” may not be as artistically inspired as the animated version, but a standout performance by Bailey keeps the film afloat. It frequently captures the kinetic energy of a Broadway stage production, delighting audiences both with signature songs and newly added sequences that enhance the story and the characters. It is consistently entertaining, with sporadic moments of dazzling brilliance.

If you don’t trust an old curmudgeon to properly evaluate a Disney Princess film, I’ll share a few points my 16-year-old daughter made.

According to B.C. Zumpe, the film’s CGI could have been better. She particularly enjoyed a scene in which Ariel and Eric are dancing in a village near his castle, while a Caribbean band plays.

“Some people want all the characters to look exactly like the originals,” she said. “It wouldn’t be fair if Disney excluded Halle just because of her skin color. They chose her for her voice and her spirit. Even if you’re only upset because she looks different from the Ariel you grew up with, you can’t expect them to keep everything the way you want it.”

My daughter also felt that Awkwafina did a good job in voicing Scuttle. She appreciated how the film promoted the idea that it is good to interact with other cultures and be open to new ideas.

She’s a good kid.

Photo courtesy of DISNEY

Halle Bailey stars as Ariel and Jonah Hauer-King as Prince Eric in “The Little Mermaid.”

Photo courtesy of DISNEY

Melissa McCarthy stars as Ursula in “The Little Mermaid.”

How has Disney leveraged nostalgia in recent years?

By turning classic animations into live-action films with major stars

What controversy did Disney's The Little Mermaid spark globally?

Debate over both Ariel's casting and racial representation.

The public reaction to the adaptations has been mixed, with some fans praising the updates and others criticizing the changes to the original stories and characters.

Title:

Content: Snow White director’s son calls Disney remake a “disgrace”

Disney

The original Snow White director’s son has slammed the upcoming Disney remake as “insulting” and a “disgrace.”

Disney has recently recreated several of its classic films into live-action adaptations. Past examples include The Little Mermaid, Dumbo, and Pinocchio. However, these recreations have generated backlash for various reasons.

For example, Halle Bailey’s role as Ariel wasn’t universally agreed upon. This is due to haters complaining that the princess should have been white like in the 1989 animated movie.

Article continues after ad

Now, the upcoming remake of Disney’s Snow White starring Rachel Zegler has been under fire for its controversial portrayal of the seven dwarves among other reasons. Here’s what the son of the original Snow White director had to say about the film.

Son of Snow White director criticizes upcoming Disney remake

In an interview with The Telegraph, David Hand, who worked as a Disney designer in the 1990s, admitted his negative feelings toward the Snow White remake. Hand’s father, also named David, served as one of the directors of the 1937 film.

Article continues after ad

“It’s a whole different concept and I just totally disagree with it, and I know my dad and Walt would also very much disagree with it,” 91-year-old Hand said. He continued by calling the movie a “disgrace” and discussed Disney’s “radical thoughts.”

“They’re making up new woke things and I’m just not into any of that. I find it quite frankly a bit insulting [what] they may have done with some of these classic films,” Hand remarked. “There’s no respect for what Disney did and what my dad did. … I think Walt and he would be turning in their graves.”

Article continues after ad

The Snow White remake has finished filming and is scheduled to premiere on March 22, 2024. Other Disney live-action projects in the works include Lilo & Stitch, Moana, and Mufasa: The Lion King.

You can find out more about Zegler’s Snow White controversy here.

Related Topics

How did audiences react to the 2020 Mulan live-action remake?

Some positive reactions praising both changes and additions

According to John Musk, the director of the original Little Mermaid, Disney should focus on creating characters that audiences can empathize with, rather than prioritizing "political correctness".

Title:

Content: The original "Little Mermaid" director can 't stand it! The real version of the irony: the zoo crab expression is even richer
Reporters Lau Wan-yan / Comprehensive Report
Disney has created countless moving animated films, accompanied by many people to grow up, such as "Snow White", "Sleeping Beauty", "Beauty and the Beast" and other classic films, in recent years, these classic animations have been remade as live-action versions, but Disney has been criticized for pursuing excessive "political correctness", while trying to convey specific ideas, ignoring the story itself. And the depth of the role, deeply criticized by the outside world.
The real version of "Little Mermaid" was criticized.
(Courtesy of Disney)
According to foreign media reports, the director of the "Little Mermaid" and "Aladdin" animation, John Musk, publicly pointed out that Disney should revise the line, focusing on the "entertainment" and "story attraction" of the work, "the concept" should be placed on the secondary, bluntly, "they should revise the line", and added that "it is not necessary to completely put the concept into, but until then, the most important thing is to create the audience. It's a role that captures the eyes of the audience."
[Advertisement] Please continue reading...
The director of the animated version of "Little Mermaid" believes that the live-action version should be more about the relationship between father and daughter.
(Courtesy of Disney)
John Musk emphasized that Disney ’ s classics were never born out of preconceived ideas, but rather immersed the audience in the world built by the story and the characters.
He believes that while it is not necessary to completely abandon the concept, before that, you should first create characters that the audience can feel and feel attracted to.
As for Disney ’ s frequent remakes of old animations into live-action versions, he believes that this is to make the audience like things, and then sell them again, and he obviously does not agree with this practice.
Disney ’ s remake of the classic animation, apart from Aladdin, has a mostly bad reputation. John Musk pointed to the 2023 live-action version of “The Little Mermaid ” and bluntly said:“ They don ’ t put much ink on the story of their father and daughter, that ’ s the core of the whole movie. ” The lions in the Lion King are much richer.
Share with friends:
※ This article is copyrighted and cannot be reproduced without permission. [ETtoday Copyright Notice] ※

According to John Musker, what should Disney prioritize in its remakes?

Overall, Disney's live-action remakes of their animated classics are a way for the company to revisit and reimagining their beloved stories for new audiences, while also tapping into the nostalgia of older fans.

How has Disney leveraged nostalgia in recent years?

By turning classic animations into live-action films with major stars