Geoffrey Hinton, the 'father of artificial intelligence', left Google in April 2023, which is a significant event given his prominence in the field and his warnings about the potential dangers of AI.

"Geoffrey Hinton, a pioneer in neural networks and artificial intelligence, resigned from Google to freely discuss the dangers of unregulated AI."

"Geoffrey Hinton, a pioneer in AI, has warned about the potential dangers of AI, including bias, joblessness, and existential risk, if not carefully managed, prompting him to leave Google to freely discuss these concerns."

Geoffrey Hinton's concerns about AI development are echoed in a report warning of severe dangers, including the destruction of societies and potential human extinction, highlighting the need for careful management of AI growth.

"Experts such as Elon Musk, Steve Wozniak, Geoffrey Hinton, and Yoshua Bengio have shared concerns about the potential risks of AI, including its potential to lead to the extinction of humanity. They have called for a moratorium on the development of certain AI systems and have warned of the enormous potential for harm that AI poses to society."

IBM estimates that AI could replace 7,800 jobs.

Geoffrey Hinton is 75 years old.

"Geoffrey Hinton is a pioneer and leading expert in the field of artificial intelligence."

Geoffrey Hinton believes that AI poses an existential risk to humanity, and he thinks that significant resources should be invested to address this issue.

Geoffrey Hinton warned that AI could have a negative impact on the job market, potentially causing widespread job displacement.

Geoffrey Hinton warns that AI might bring negative consequences, including job loss and wealth concentration, which could lead to increased societal violence.

Geoffrey Hinton warned about the disastrous consequences of AI's rapid development, including the potential for AI to take control of us and exacerbate social inequalities, emphasizing that these risks are real and must be taken seriously.

Geoffrey Hinton, the 'father of artificial intelligence', left Google in April 2023, which is a significant event given his prominence in the field and his warnings about the potential dangers of AI.

Title:

Content: General Supervision
Elham Aboul Fath
Editor-in-Chief
Thank you for your patience.
General Supervision
Elham Aboul Fath
Editor-in-Chief
Thank you for your patience.
Artificial Intelligence Godfather Geoffrey Hinton: Regrets Inventing This Thing
Google is racing to develop its own AI tool Bard to be a strong competitor to ChatGPT and Microsoft ’ s Bing AI search engine, but it seems that Google ’ s hasty policy to roll out generative AI products was not in line with the desire of all workers.
Google Vice President Geoffrey Hinton announced to The New York Times his resignation from Google in April.
The departure of Hinton, nicknamed the “father of artificial intelligence ” and the first to adopt ChatGPT prototypes in 2012, is a blow to a company the size and fame of Google, being one of the most prominent figures in the field.
Dr. Hinton said that he quit his job at Google after more than a decade and gained a very good reputation in the field, so he can speak freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, and oddly he turned to the exact opposite position, admitting that he regrets his work in this field.
In a lengthy interview last week in the dining room of his Toronto home, Dr. Hinton said, “I consolate myself now that if I hadn ’ t taken all these steps in AI, someone else would certainly have done my part. ”
Hinton fears that generative AI tools are dangerous if they fall into irresponsible hands, and that “it ’ s hard to see how to prevent bad actors from using them for nefarious purposes. ”
As companies develop their AI at an astonishing speed, Hinton believes it is becoming increasingly dangerous, “see how it developed, compare this technology five years ago and now, it ’ s really terrifying, ” stressing that these robotic robots could at some point outperform humans in terms of thinking and creativity and would not be just a machine inferior to humans and thus destroy human life as we know it.
He pointed out that his concern at the moment about the ability of these tools to manufacture fabricated images, audio videos and a completely fake image, the average person will not be able to distinguish between the real and the fake, and therefore will be an important tool for spreading false information.
Moreover, artificial intelligence tools will be the substitute for humans in a very large number of jobs, which will occupy the existing professions, causing unprecedented unemployment rates globally.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

"Geoffrey Hinton, a pioneer in neural networks and artificial intelligence, resigned from Google to freely discuss the dangers of unregulated AI."

Title:

Content: My channel
* Drag categories can be customized sorting
Recover Default OK
Setup
Alert
Iran's President Lehi Helicopter Crashes Five Hours Later, Still Not Found
Beyond Singer Wong Ka Kui ’ s Tomb Destroyed with a Hammer, Tongue Licking Tombstone
AI Godfather Hinton: Britain needs to push universal basic income to ease AI impact
Geoffrey Hinton, a computer scientist hailed as the godfather of artificial intelligence (AI), said the UK government must introduce universal basic income (UBI) to address the inequality caused by AI.
Hinton said it was necessary to give a fixed amount of cash to every British citizen because he was “very worried that AI would take away a lot of mundane jobs. ”
“I have been consulted by officials in Downing Street and my advice is that basic income for all is a good idea, ” he said.
He noted that while he thinks AI will increase productivity and wealth, the money will go to the rich, not to the unemployed due to AI, which is very bad for society.
Hinton is the pioneer of neural networks, which are the theoretical basis for the current AI explosion.
Hinton left Google last year, leaving the tech giant to be more free to discuss how dangerous unregulated AI is.
However, critics say the cost of universal basic income is very high and diverts money from public services, and does not necessarily help alleviate poverty.
A British government spokesman said there was no plan to introduce a universal basic income.
AI Artificial Intelligence Google
The last one.
Harry's "royal visit" to Nigeria is a money laundering fugitive
The next one.
Drones bombed Ukraine, destroyed 37, and Russia shot down 60.
Extended reading
Super-popular
More >

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

"Geoffrey Hinton, a pioneer in AI, has warned about the potential dangers of AI, including bias, joblessness, and existential risk, if not carefully managed, prompting him to leave Google to freely discuss these concerns."

Title:

Content: Google seeks to fix fairness in AI technology

By Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press, Toronto

Automation / Robotics Electronics AI artificial intelligence Google Technology

But artificial intelligence still has biases echoed by society

An artificial intelligence researcher at Google says fixing fairness in the technology “isn’t a simple thing,” but the world has an opportunity to get it right as the software explodes in popularity.

“It’s as though we have been given a second chance on how we use this technology to dismantle some of the biases we see in society,” Komal Singh, a senior product manager at the tech goliath, said in a Tuesday media briefing in Toronto.

Her optimism comes as the tech sector – and nearly every other industry – have spent the year abuzz about AI’s promise and perils.

Source: Getty Images

Some see the technology as a game changer bound to disrupt everyday life and bring expediency, efficiency and solutions to some of the globe’s biggest challenges. Others, including Tesla owner Elon Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, warn advances in the technology are moving too fast and guardrails are needed before wide-scale deployments.

Advertisement

Geoffrey Hinton, the British-Canadian computer scientist widely considered the `godfather of AI’, is so concerned with the technology he left Google so he can more freely discuss the dangers, which he has said include bias and discrimination, joblessness, echo chambers, fake news, battle robots and existential risk. Singh acknowledged AI is not without risks. She’s even seen them firsthand. For example, she said if you ask an AI model to generate an image of a nurse it will often return a woman, while a request for an image of a CEO typically brings up a white man and a query for a software engineer delivers racialized men.

A lot needs to happen to fix the fairness

“In a nutshell, I think the takeaway is a lot needs to happen to fix the fairness problem,” Singh said.

At Google, some of that work has come from studying skin tones because dark and medium tones often can’t be deciphered by computer vision systems, which allow computers to “see and understand” images of people and environments.

“This is problematic because a lot of the social disparities around colourism then get populated into social technical systems, which then end up reinforcing them,” Singh said.

To break the cycle, Google partnered with Harvard University professor, Dr. Ellis Monk to design an open-source skin tone scale that can better detect darker tones and be used by AI models to reduce biases. It’s already been deployed within its camera detection technology, on Pixel phones and in search tools, helping to diversify results so keywords bring up a range of skin tones and hair textures. The company also has a project called Media Understanding for Social Exploration, which studied 12 years of American television shows to analyze representation across skin tones.

Racing to develop and launch the most advanced technology

Their findings were “stark,” Singh said. Over the past 12 years, there was a slight increase in the screen time given to those with dark and medium skin tones, while the amount of time those with lighter skin spent on screen was slightly lower. Such work comes at a pivotal time for AI. Top tech companies are racing to develop and launch the most advanced technology, competing with one another for billions of dollars pouring into the industry.

In Canada, Google estimates generative AI could increase the economy by $210 billion and save the average worker over 100 hours a year. Google leaders accompanying Singh said they’re already using AI to improve breast cancer detection, sequence genomes and develop systems that medical clinicians can plug questions into to generate health guidance. E-commerce giant Shopify Inc. is using the technology to reduce search abandonment, while Canadian National Railway Co. is building a digital supply chain platform with automated shipment tracking, Google workers said.

At Google, AI underpins the company’s search engine, maps and cloud storage and is the basis for Bard, its rival product to ChatGPT, that has yet to launch in Canada. Sam Sebastian, the head of Google Cloud’s Canadian operations, promised it would make its Canadian debut “very soon,” but offered no specific timeline. Instead, he discussed his overall outlook on AI, saying it was a technological shift unlike anything he’s seen in his 25 years working in the industry.

“The only thing close to it is the advent of the mobile phone,” he said.

The transformative nature means anyone in the space needs to balance AI’s potential with its risks, he said. For its part, Google has committed to abide by a series of principles as it delves deeper into AI. It has so far promised not to design or deploy AI technologies that cause or are likely to harm, including weapons or systems used to inflict injuries. It also says it will not work on AI-based “surveillance violating internationally accepted norms” or systems which will contravene laws and human rights.

Advertisement

Stories continue below

Print this page

Related Stories

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Poses ethical risks
Becomes uncontrollable

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

Geoffrey Hinton's concerns about AI development are echoed in a report warning of severe dangers, including the destruction of societies and potential human extinction, highlighting the need for careful management of AI growth.

Title:

Content: 1.
Skip to content
2.
Skip to main menu
3.
Skip to more DW pages
ScienceNorth America
Report Warns Artificial Intelligence Could Cause Human Extinction
14 March 2024
A report released a few days ago warned of severe dangers surrounding the development of some sophisticated artificial intelligence models, including the destruction of societies and the collapse of democracy to the production of weapons that target humans and cannot be controlled.
https: / / p.dw.com / p / 4dTXl
A new report paints a worrying picture of the “catastrophic ” national security risks posed by rapidly evolving artificial intelligence, warning the world is running out of time to avert disaster.
The findings of the report, commissioned by the State Department, were based on interviews with more than 200 people over more than a year, including senior executives from leading artificial intelligence companies, cybersecurity researchers, weapons of mass destruction experts, and national security officials within the government.
Threat at at Extinction Level
The report, released this week, categorically suggests that more advanced AI systems than humans could, in the worst case scenario, "pose an extinction-level threat to the human race," according to the Gladstone AI group that prepared the report.
Featuring national security experts and Silicon Valley executives with AI expertise, Gladstone AI advises the U.S. national security and defense communities on dealing with the opportunities and risks that come with unprecedented and accelerating AI capabilities.
The report ’ s warning is yet another reminder that while AI ’ s potential continues to captivate investors and the public, there are also real risks surrounding it.
Jeremy Harris, CEO and co-founder of Gladstone Group, said: “AI is a breakthrough technology that can allow us to heal diseases, make scientific discoveries, and overcome challenges we once thought insurmountable.
Growing evidence of increased risk
“But this technology may also bring serious risks, including catastrophic risks, that we should be aware of, ” Harris said, adding that“ a growing body of evidence — including research and empirical analysis published at the world ’ s top AI conferences — suggests that when a certain threshold of capability is exceeded, AI systems are likely to become out of control. ”
Going back to the report, competitive pressures are pushing companies to accelerate AI development “at the expense of safety and security, ” increasing the likelihood that more advanced AI systems will be“ stolen ” and “weaponized ” against the United States.
Nearly a year ago, Jeffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” quit his job at Google and set off an alarm about the technology he helped develop.
Hinton said there is a 10% chance that artificial intelligence will lead to human extinction within the next three decades.
Quasi-human capabilities
The report also pointed to some prominent figures who have warned about the existential risks posed by artificial intelligence, including SpaceX and X chairman Elon Musk, Federal Trade Commission chairman Lina Khan, and former OpenAI chief executive.
Some employees at AI companies share similar concerns, as the report said that one individual at an AI lab expressed fear of launching a specific next-generation model of open source AI, which is very bad, because one of the results of developing this model will be the destruction of democracy if it is used in areas such as election interference or voter manipulation.
The report also pointed to experts ’ concerns that AI ’ s crossing of the currently imposed human barrier could lead to “irreversible global effects, ” especially with the General Artificial Intelligence (AGI) model, a hypothetical form of AI that has human-like learning capability and may surpass that of humans.
Fear of “losing control ”
Public AI is seen as “the main driver of catastrophic risk from loss of control, ” and notes that major tech companies have spoken of having access to public AI by 2028, although others believe it could take much longer.
A previous document published by the Gladstone Group warns that the development of general artificial intelligence and capabilities approaching its level "would lead to catastrophic risks unlike anything the world has ever faced", amounting to "risks resembling weapons of mass destruction".
For example, the report stated that AI systems could be used to design and execute “high-impact cyberattacks capable of crippling critical infrastructure, ” and that“ a simple verbal or written order, such as executing an untraceable cyberattack to disrupt the North American power grid, could lead to a response of a quality that proves to be catastrophically effective. ”
Other examples that the report ’ s experts are concerned about include “large-scale ” AI-backed disinformation campaigns that destabilize societies and undermine trust in institutions; armed robotic applications such as drone attacks; psychological manipulation and the exploitation of biological sciences to produce deadly weapons; and artificial intelligence systems that seek power and are almost impossible to control.
Eh, Eh.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What severe risks did the March 2024 report warn about advanced AI models?

"Experts such as Elon Musk, Steve Wozniak, Geoffrey Hinton, and Yoshua Bengio have shared concerns about the potential risks of AI, including its potential to lead to the extinction of humanity. They have called for a moratorium on the development of certain AI systems and have warned of the enormous potential for harm that AI poses to society."

Title:

Content: Today 10 June 2023
18 +
MWC 2018 2018 Computex IFA 2018
News Software
“If we slow down, the AI race will not stop ” – not all AI developers are ready to suspend development
Alex Carp, head of software company Palantir, says that only those who “don ’ t have AI products want to pause. ”
His company announced additional investments and rejected calls to suspend AI development.
“The race has started – the only question is, will we stay ahead or lose the lead? ” – asks the question with an edge Alex.
He is confident that the West currently has key commercial and military advantages in the field of AI and should not give them up.
Image source: Pixabay
“If we slow down, the AI race will not stop.
“No country in the world, especially our adversaries, can allow us to have this advantage, ” he said.
Karp ’ s comments have a very different tone compared to the recent glut of dire warnings about the potentially existential threat AI poses to humanity, and accompanying calls for slowing or even stopping its development.
In March, Elon Musk, Steve Wozniak, and more than 1,000 other AI experts and industry representatives called for a six-month moratorium on training AI systems that are more productive than OpenAI ’ s recently unveiled GPT-4.
In an open letter, they warned of potential risks to society.
In May, AI industry leaders, including executives from OpenAI and Google Deepmind, warned that artificial intelligence could lead to the extinction of humanity.
As one of the threats, they pointed out the involvement of AI in the development of a new generation of chemical weapons.
Two of the three so-called godfathers of AI — Geoffrey Hinton and Professor Yoshua Bengio — were among those who warned that the technology they helped create had enormous potential for harm.
Regulators in many countries are struggling to develop new rules to limit the risk of using AI.
This fall, the UK is planning a global summit on AI, and Prime Minister Rishi Sunak wants the UK to make efforts to ensure that the benefits of AI are “harnessed for the benefit of humanity. ”
The composition of the summit is not yet known, but the UK government said it would “bring together key countries, leading technology companies and researchers to agree on security measures to assess and monitor the most significant risks associated with AI. ”
Sunak argues that the UK is a “natural place ” to talk about AI, mentioning recent meetings with executives from leading AI firms.
According to him, this sector of the economy, which employs 50,000 people, brought the UK £3.7 billion.
Sunak ’ s desire to lead the process is understandable, but many question Britain ’ s leadership in this area.
Analysts believe that the UK may be too ambitious, and there are sharp differences in approaches to governance and regulation between the EU and the US, which the UK will be difficult to influence.
In addition, a number of global initiatives already exist, including the UN Global Digital Compact, which has a stronger fundamental foundation.
It should be noted that none of the most innovative firms in the field of artificial intelligence is based in the UK.
“Instead of trying to play this role, the UK may need to focus on encouraging responsible behavior in the research, development and deployment of these technologies, ” said Yasmin Afina, a research fellow at the Chatham House Digital Society Initiative.
The European Union is developing a law on artificial intelligence, but admits that even in the best case, it will take two and a half years to enter into force.
EU Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager said it would be “too late ”.
She reported on work on a voluntary code that could be drafted in a matter of weeks.
China is also actively developing rules for the use of AI, including a requirement to notify users whenever an AI algorithm is used.
Contradictions between AI developers and regulators will only multiply.
In the future, we can expect mass protests against the use of AI, because of which thousands of people are already losing their jobs, and in the future their number may be measured in millions.
Source:
If you notice an error - select it with the mouse and press CTRL + ENTER.
Materials on the topic
window-new
Soft
Hard
Trends 🔥

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

IBM estimates that AI could replace 7,800 jobs.

Title:

Content: Skip to Content
The Download

The Download: recycling wind turbine blades, and safeguarding AI

Plus: A contraceptive vaccine is on the horizon

This is today's edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what's going on in the world of technology.

How chemists could give new life to old wind turbine blades

The news: Wind turbines are crucial for addressing climate change, but when they’ve reached the end of their lives, turbine blades could add up to a lot of waste. Now new research, published in Nature, could represent a first step toward building renewable-energy infrastructure that doesn’t end up in a landfill.

Why it’s a challenge: Wind turbine blades need to be tough to be useful. But as a result of their durability, they can’t currently be recycled. The new work describes a way to recover the main components of wind turbine blades, breaking down the plastic that holds them together without destroying the material’s primary building blocks.

Why it matters: This is the first time that researchers have been able to break down a reinforced epoxy material to recover both the plastic’s building blocks and the glass fibers inside without damaging either. Read the full story.

—Casey Crownhart

How worried should we be about AI?

Geoffrey Hinton, the AI pioneer who just stepped down from Google so he could freely discuss his concerns about the technology, will be in conversation with Will Douglas Heaven, our senior AI editor, this afternoon at 1pm ET. It’s part of our EmTech Digital lineup, and if you haven’t already, it’s not too late to register for tickets.

The must-reads

I’ve combed the internet to find you today’s most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.

1 The White House is pressuring AI firms over safeguarding
US vice president Kamala Harris is meeting with AI leaders to cajole them to mitigate potential harms. (Bloomberg $)
+ IBM estimates it could replace 7,800 jobs with AI. (WP $)
+ A Cambridge Analytica-style scandal for AI is coming. (MIT Technology Review)

2 The world’s first contraceptive vaccine is entering clinical trials
Unlike other forms of birth control, it doesn’t mess with menstrual cycles. (The Atlantic $)
+ What patient portals tell us about ourselves. (New Yorker $)
+ The first babies conceived with a sperm-injecting robot have been born. (MIT Technology Review)

3 Google is still funding climate misinformation
Despite its promises to stop running climate denial content on YouTube. (NYT $)
+ The flawed logic of rushing out extreme climate interventions. (MIT Technology Review)

4 Things are getting crazy over on Bluesky 🍑
No, seriously. Go and see for yourself. (The Verge)

5 A Russian spy network is fueling the country’s war efforts
It’s managed to covertly obtain chips, ammunition, and other types of EU tech. (FT $)

6 Amazon’s Alexa is getting a ChatGPT-style makeover
Making the once-ubiquitous voice assistant smarter is the aim of the game. (Insider $)
+ There’s a new chatbot in town—and this one’s called Pi. (FT $)

7 Is your car selling your private data?
A new tool could help you find out. (Motherboard)

8 How the colossal SolarWinds cyberattack unfolded
Two years on, investigators are still trying to piece it together. (Wired $)
+ Three ways AI chatbots are a security disaster. (MIT Technology Review)

9 Working for one of India’s top startups is a double-edged sword
For some women, it’s a lifeline. Others say it’s unsafe. (Rest of World)

10 Video games are an excellent security primer
If it’s good enough for the Pentagon… (The Intercept)
+ We may never fully know how video games affect our well-being. (MIT Technology Review)

Quote of the day

“There's no giant leap of capability.”

—A group of Stanford researchers explain why they believe fears we may lose control of AI have been dramatically overblown to Motherboard.

The big story

The internet runs on free open-source software. Who pays to fix it?

December 2021

Volkan Yazici is a member of the Log4J project, an open-source tool used widely to record activity inside various types of software. It helps run huge swaths of the internet, including applications ranging from iCloud to Twitter, and he and his colleagues are desperately trying to deal with a massive vulnerability that has put billions of machines at risk.

The vulnerability in Log4J is extremely easy to exploit. After sending a malicious string of characters to a vulnerable machine, hackers can execute any code they want—and years later, there’s still no clear end in sight. Read the full story.

—Patrick Howell O'Neill

We can still have nice things

A place for comfort, fun and distraction in these weird times. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line or tweet 'em at me.)

+ Recognize those archive Met Gala looks? They looked even better the first time around.
+ Ever seen a baby crab before? They’re surprisingly cute.
+ If you’re wondering how everything’s going with Twitter, this handy website should fill you in pretty quickly.
+ There’s a lot going on creating this colorful rug (at least, I think it’s a rug)
+ A cocktail party where everyone’s the same height? Why not!

Deep Dive

The Download

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

Geoffrey Hinton is 75 years old.

Title:

Content: Geoffrey Hinton: GPT-4 is 100 times more knowledgeable than any human
Author: MIAO Yongqi
Published: Updated:
Computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton, known as the "godfather of artificial intelligence", announced Monday that he has resigned from Google. He has devoted his life to developing artificial intelligence systems, saying he "regrets his life's work" and is wary of the potential dangers of AI development.
In another recent interview, Hinton further talked about why he is afraid of AI development.
Hinton, 75, left Google a few days after the news broke in an interview with MIT Technology Review senior editor Will Douglas Heaven.
Hinton points out that the new generation of AI language models, especially the GPT-4, which came out in March, made him realize that these machines were moving in a direction that was much smarter than he thought, and he was afraid of these developments.
He is best known for a technique he proposed in the 1980s (with two colleagues) called backpropagation.
In short, the algorithms that allow machines to learn support almost all of today ’ s artificial neural networks, from computer vision systems to large language models.
It wasn ’ t until the 2010s that Hinton and his two recent graduates developed a “neural network ” that demonstrated its power, stronger than any computer ’ s ability to identify objects in images, and trained it to predict the next letter of a sentence, a precursor to today ’ s large-scale language patterns.
One of the students was Ilya Sutskever, the founder of OpenAI, who led the development of ChatGPT.
“We first thought it might be great. ”“ But it ’ s going to take a long time to realize that it needs to be done on a large scale to get good results. ”
In the 1980s, the discussion of “neural networks ” was considered a joke.
But Hinton doesn ’ t think so, and is working on this, software that mimics the abstract human brain and uses code as a connection between neurons. For 40 years, Hinton has viewed artificial neural networks as a clumsy attempt to mimic biological neural networks.
Now he thinks things have changed: he thinks there are better results when trying to mimic the behavior of the biological brain.
“It ’ s scary when you see it with your own eyes, ” he said.“ It ’ s a sudden change. ”
So why did ChatGPT surprise Hinton, too? He explained that the human brain has about 100 trillion connections, and “large language models have up to 500 billion, up to a trillion. ”
However, the knowledge of GPT-4 is a hundred times greater than that of any human.
So maybe it actually has a better learning algorithm than we do. "
He also pointed out that apart from the ability to learn, the ability to communicate is another kind of point.
“If you or I learn a new thing and want to teach it to another person, we can ’ t just send them a copy. ”
But artificial neural networks can do it.
It ’ s like there are 10,000 people here, and when one person learns a new thing, the other 9,999 people all learn it at the same time.
Hinton now believes that there are two types of intelligence: animal brains and artificial neural networks.
“It ’ s a completely different kind of intelligence.
“A new, better intelligence. ” Hinton believes that whether superintelligence is good or bad depends largely on whether you ’ re an optimist or a pessimist, and he says,“ mildly depressed, ” “that ’ s why I ’ m afraid. ”
“Whether these things are going to be smarter than us, I suddenly changed my mind. ”
I think they are very close to us now and they will be much smarter than us in the future, ” he said.
“How do we survive? ” he is particularly worried that people will use the tools he has developed to change the trajectory of human life, including elections and wars.
He said that he hopes to continue talking about AI security after leaving office and spend more time on “more philosophical work ”.“ As long as I ’ m still employed at Google, I can ’ t say what I want to say, ” he said. “I have a lot of good things to say about Google, and it would be more convincing if I wasn ’ t at Google. ”
Who is the godfather of AI computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton?
Hinton pioneered the basic technology of AI systems and became interested in artificial neural networks when he was a graduate student at the University of Edinburgh in 1972. In 2018, he and two experts in the field of deep learning were awarded the Turing Award, known as the “Nobel Prize in Computing ”.
What are the main concerns of “AI Godfather ” Geoffrey Hinton about the development of artificial intelligence?
He believes that the most direct impact is to promote the dissemination of false information and the loss of employment opportunities, and also worries about the use of this tool for evil, such as influencing elections and using it in war.

"Geoffrey Hinton is a pioneer and leading expert in the field of artificial intelligence."

Title:

Content: How can artificial intelligence kill thousands?
Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt has warned that artificial intelligence (AI) will have the potential to harm or kill many people in the near future.
At the Wall Street Journal ’ s Chief Executives Board conference in London, he stressed that broad AI models pose an existential threat to humanity.
He also expressed concern about the "existential danger" of the rapidly evolving technology and warned that it would be difficult to contain it, explaining that many people would be hurt or killed.
Schmidt compared artificial intelligence to the rise of nuclear technology, warning that it would be difficult for the world to control its spread.
The expert pointed out that there are close scenarios that talk about artificial intelligence systems will be able to detect gaps and problems in the Internet and new types of biology.
UNESCO stresses that the ethical dimension must be invoked in the ambition of countries to benefit from this technological development in order to reduce the risks resulting from it.
This is a fantasy today, but the logic is likely to be correct, he said, pointing out that when that happens, the bad guys will be ready to use these systems.
In turn, UNESCO has called for the implementation of a 2021 recommendation on ways to develop this intelligence, stressing the creation of a legislative tool to regulate and monitor artificial intelligence, as well as ensuring the “full security of personal and sensitive data. ”
UNESCO stresses that the ethical dimension must be evoked in the ambition of countries to benefit from this technological development in order to reduce the risks resulting from it, and stresses the UN that this technology currently creates significant challenges, especially the possibility of disseminating misleading information, and other violations of the rights of individuals and groups.
Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” has previously said he left his role at Google to speak publicly about the“ risks ” of the technology he helped develop.
Google fired an engineer who claimed an undisclosed AI system had become conscious, saying it violated hiring and data security policies.
Hinton ’ s pioneering work in neural networks has shaped artificial intelligence systems that power many contemporary products.
He worked part-time at Google for a decade in the tech giant ’ s AI development efforts, but has since had concerns about the technology and its role in its development.
Hinton ’ s decision to abandon the company and talk about the technology comes as a growing number of lawmakers, advocacy groups and tech insiders have raised alarms about the possibility of a new set of AI-powered chatbots spreading misinformation and displacing jobs.
In July, the company fired an engineer who claimed that an undisclosed AI system had become conscious, saying it violated employment and data security policies.
Many in the AI community strongly refused to confirm what the engineer said.
Hinton told the New York Times, which was the first to report his decision, “I console myself with the ordinary excuse that if I hadn ’ t done it, someone else would have done it. ”
Related Stories
No stories found.
Erm News
www.eremnews.com

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

Geoffrey Hinton believes that AI poses an existential risk to humanity, and he thinks that significant resources should be invested to address this issue.

Title:

Content: AI threatens human survival more than climate change AI godfather: research should not stop
May 07, 2023 18: 05
Eastern Network Television
More News Clips
Geoffrey Hinton, known as the "godfather" of AI, said that the threat of artificial intelligence (AI) to humanity is more urgent than climate change.
Hinton said he wasn ’ t trying to downplay the importance of climate change or say “you shouldn ’ t worry about climate change ” because it ’ s a huge risk.
But he believes that the threat posed by AI to humans is more urgent.
He said that it is relatively easier for humans to come up with effective strategies to deal with climate change, such as stopping carbon emissions, and eventually everything will be fine.
But AI risks, at present, humans simply do not know what to do.
However, he did not agree with the suspension of research on AI because of this, admitting that "it is not practical at all."
I agree that this is an existential risk, and that we should now work very hard and invest a lot of resources to figure out what we can do.
Even more, leaders in the technology industry are the most aware of the risks of AI, and politicians must participate, because AI affects all human beings and must consider how to deal with it.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

Geoffrey Hinton warned that AI could have a negative impact on the job market, potentially causing widespread job displacement.

Title:

Content: • |
• Fast Quote
• |
• Member
• Product Services / Streaming
• Settings
12 / 05 / 2023
The White House ordered AI to be evaluated, and the European Union proposed legislation to regulate AI, teach AI to be human or the best solution!
• Add Favorite Column
• Collection of articles
• Fang Zhanqi
Fang Zhanze
When I was a teenager, I studied Geographic Information System, but unfortunately I didn ’ t learn anything and I graduated with luck.
After adulthood, the accidental hit into the media circle, first and then in the print, electronic, online media to roll, slightly small.
After middle age, he completed a master ’ s degree in information technology and gradually expanded his horizons. He was determined to join a start-up company and explore different fields of technology.
In recent years, he has been actively engaged in data analysis and digital strategies, and has also been involved in the development of Location Intelligence projects. Sometimes, he can also take time to teach, not only to share what he has learned with others, but also to motivate himself to keep learning for life.
Tales of Wisdom City
Generative AI is definitely the hottest topic in the technology world today. After the popularity of ChatGPT, many companies rushed to launch similar products and gradually applied them to various industries.
But more and more people are worried that when AI is fully popularized, it will aggravate the problem of fake information flow, online fraud and other problems; even Sheffield Hinton, who is known as the "godfather of AI", is worried that AI will become too smart, afraid that it will evolve into a killer robot, which may eventually lead to the death of mankind!
How big can the negative impact of AI technology be?
How do governments around the world respond to the potential threat of AI?
Neural network is the foundation technology of ChatGPT
Fifty-one years ago, Geoffrey Hinton, who had not yet been called the “godfather of AI, ” entered the University of Edinburgh in Scotland as a graduate student and began research on artificial neural networks.
The so-called “artificial neural network ” is a mathematical model that mimics the structure and function of biological neural networks, especially the brain, and is able to learn skills by analyzing data.
This is the foundational technology behind OpenAI ChatGPT and Google Bard.
After Hinton resigned from Google, he did not have to worry about the harm his words would bring to Google, so he was interviewed by different media and said his heart: "AI may lead to the death of mankind." (Photo: University of Toronto official website)
In 2012, Hinton and his students, Ilya Sutskever and Alex Krishevsky, created a neural network system that analyzes thousands of photos and learns to recognize common things like flowers, dogs, cars, etc.
Subsequently, Hinton and two students founded DNNresearch, a startup based on this research project.
In 2013, Google acquired DNNresearch for US $44 million (approximately HK $343 million), and Hinton joined Google as Vice President and Engineering Researcher, responsible for some of the research work on Google Brain.
His protégé, Suzkville, left Google to co-found OpenAI with like-minded people, and became chief scientist, leading the research team to successfully develop the GPT model and ChatGPT.
Hinton ’ s top student, Suzkville, gave up his lucrative job at Google in 2015 to co-found OpenAI with Altman and others, and led the development of GPT and DALL-E models. (Image: University of Toronto website)
I regret working my whole life because I am worried about the dangers of AI.
In 2018, Hinton, along with University of Montreal professor Yoshua Bengio and Meta chief AI scientist Yann LeCun, won the A.M. Turing Award in recognition of their great contributions to neural networks and deep learning.
As a result, the three later became known as the “godfathers of AI ” or“ godfathers of deep learning. ”
Around the same time, Google and OpenAI began to build large-scale deep learning systems based on neural networks, which became the basis for future development of Bard and ChatGPT.
From this, it seems that Sinton plays an important role in creating the current glory of generative AI.
However, in the current era of AI, Sinton suddenly left Google in April 2023, shocking the entire AI industry.
Hinton explained that he left Google to talk freely about the potential risks of AI without harming Google.
Speaking about 50 years of research into neural networks, he said, “I ’ m very sorry about my life ’ s work. ”
The Internet will be filled with more and more fake AI-generated text, photos, and even videos, but the average person will not be able to tell the truth, Hinton said.
Moreover, sooner or later, AI technology will completely disrupt the job market, causing more and more jobs to disappear.
What is even more worrying is that at present, users can not only instruct ChatGPT to generate code, but also ask the AI to execute the code; in this way, the AI killer robots that often appear in science fiction movies will one day become a reality.
Is it not impossible for AI to destroy humanity?
Of course, this pessimistic future scenario is only a hypothetical one, but Hinton stressed that what could lead to it is already happening: a global race for AI technology has begun between Microsoft and Google, and even between China and the United States.
Most people think that the future of AI dominating everything is still far away, but he believes that AI may not take 30 to 50 years to control humans, and even find a way to kill humans, which may eventually lead to human extinction.
In the 1980s, Hinton was a professor of computer science at Carnegie Mellon University in the United States, but because he was not satisfied that the university's AI research was sponsored by the United States Department of Defense, he decided to leave the United States to teach at the University of Toronto's School of Computer Science.
He pointed out that without some kind of global regulatory agreement or regulatory mechanism, the AI arms race will intensify.
For this reason, Hinton believes that the threat posed by AI to humans may be more urgent than climate change, because the solution to climate change is obvious, as long as carbon emissions are reduced or carbon neutrality is achieved, but the current AI crisis does not know how to start. Although AI may pose an existential threat to humans, he does not agree to suspend AI research, because it can never erase the benefits and application value of AI.
Hinton believes it would be better to step up regulation of AI and make everyone aware of its potential harms.
OpenAI co-founder and CEO Sam Altman also acknowledged that ChatGPT has developed some reasoning capabilities that they can ’ t explain, and that it ’ s not entirely impossible for AI to destroy humans.
However, he said that he has installed a kill switch for ChatGPT, and if the development of ChatGPT exceeds human expectations, he will immediately press the switch to stop working.
OpenAI CEO Altman, known as the “father of ChatGPT, ” recently said he was“ a little scared ” about the potential of his children, and even admitted that there is a real possibility that AI will destroy humanity. (Image: Wikipedia)
Altman admits that ChatGPT ’ s influence in elections and the spread of disinformation is a concern, so the 2024 U.S. presidential election will be a focus for OpenAI.
(Image source: Pexels Gallery website)
The Curtain of Ignorance Makes AI Right Values
However, before we press the switch, we can try to instill the right values in AI, such as helping those most in need, not destroying humans. Google ’ s DeepMind paper published in April 2023 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggests that AI can be taught from the perspective of political philosopher John Rawls.
Rawls has proposed a concept called “The Veil of Ignorance ”, which aims to achieve the most equitable distribution of benefits when group decisions are made.
According to his book, The Debate, if a group of people stand behind a curtain, all of them will instantly lose their memory, become ignorant, and forget their identity and status in the real world.
The political philosopher Ross assumes that people are behind the “curtain of ignorance ” (left) and have no idea of their skills, identities, and status.
In this scenario, people tend to choose the most equitable distribution of rights for all. (Image: Wikipedia)
At this time, these people are asked to vote for a working principle for the society.
Because they do not know where they are in this society, they cannot make decisions in an egoistic way, and they can only judge according to the principle of fairness to all people.
The situation is like, at the birthday party, you are responsible for cutting the cake, because you do not know which piece you will get, so you will try to cut each piece to the same size.
Under the curtain of ignorance, fairness and justice that has nothing to do with personal interests will emerge.
For this reason, DeepMind believes that applying the “curtain of ignorance ” to AI training may help promote fairness in the process of“ aligning ” AI with human values.
By “alignment ”, it means aligning AI ’ s wishes with those of humanity.
If AI shares fair values with humans, AI will not have the intention to destroy humanity.
White House convenes tech giants to discuss AI threats
However, even if AI does not intend to destroy humans, it may still have many negative effects on human society.
The Center for Artificial Intelligence and Digital Policy (CAIDP), a U.S. technology ethics organization, has complained to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that OpenAI ’ s latest large language model, GPT-4, is biased and deceptive and poses a risk to privacy and public safety.
The CAIDP lists potential threats that may arise from GPT-4, including: helping hackers churn out malicious code to exacerbate cyberattacks; and biased AI training data that may reinforce social stereotypes and make people of all races and genders vulnerable to unfair treatment. The FTC is investigating OpenAI, said FTC Chairman Lina Khan. "They cannot be separated from existing legislation and the Federal Trade Commission will actively enforce them," he said.
In an effort to make GPT-4 more secure, OpenAI hired 50 experts and academics to test GPT-4 against lies, language manipulation, and dangerous scientific common sense.
The OpenAI headquarters is pictured here. (Image: Wikipedia)
In early May 2023, the White House invited Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, OpenAI founder Altman, and artificial intelligence startup Anthropic founder Dario Amodei to attend a conference to discuss the impact of AI on society.
Government officials at the meeting included Vice President Kamala Harris, Biden Chief of Staff Jeff Zients, National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, National Economic Council Chairman Lael Brainard, and Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo.
U.S. President Joe Biden also attended the meeting.
EU to pass world ’ s first AI regulatory law
Generative AI, while helping to improve lives, can also pose security, privacy and fraud issues, says Ms Ho.
She noted that AI companies have an ethical and legal responsibility to ensure the safety of their AI products, while at the same time working with governments to protect civil rights and privacy.
She stressed that the White House will work to advance potential new legislation and support new legislation to mitigate the potential harms of AI technology.
In contrast, Europe has taken a step ahead in AI legislation.
On 11 May 2023, the European Parliament ’ s Committee on Civil Liberties and Consumer Protection overwhelmingly approved a position paper calling for restrictions on the use of AI in Europe, a crucial first step towards the adoption of the world ’ s first AI regulation bill.
The draft bill will be submitted to the full European Parliament for a vote in June of the same year, after which representatives of the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission will work out the final terms of the bill in tripartite talks.
The European Parliament has adopted a position paper that strengthens restrictions on biometrics, facial recognition, and the use of AI by police in routine duties.
The parliament believes the move could lead to the world ’ s first AI regulation bill. (Image: Wikipedia)
On the other hand, the White House announced that Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, NVIDIA, Stability AI, Anthropic, and Hugging Face have all committed to participating in DEF CON 31, a computer security conference to be held in August 2023, so that their AI models will be tested and evaluated by hackers and AI experts.
Experts will try to identify errors, failures, and vulnerabilities in AI tools so that AI companies can solve existing problems in their models early on.
However, these AI companies simply agree to a one-time test, rather than a commitment to a continuous evaluation when launching or improving their products, and may therefore not be sufficient to meet the regulatory requirements.
Despite this, DEF CON 31 is still seen as the first step for an AI model to be publicly evaluated.
We hope that after each important first step in legislative regulation and public evaluation, we can put generative AI trains on the right track, so that everyone can safely benefit from technological innovation.
DEF CON is one of the largest computer security conferences in the world. In addition to cybersecurity experts and hackers, participants included staff from the FBI, the Department of Defense, and the Postal Inspection Service.
The conference covered areas such as software security, computer architecture, hardware modifications, and other vulnerable areas of information. (Image: DEF CON official website)
The content of the signed and / or unsigned articles published by Economic Times is the author's personal opinion and does not represent the position of Economic Times, and the role of Economic Times is to provide a free speech platform.
etnet won the HKEX Awards 2022 “Best Performing Securities Data Provider ” and“ Best Performing Derivative Data Provider ” ► Learn More
I want to respond
You may be interested
Enlarge display
I know. I know.
Featured Articles
• Life
• DIVA
• Healthy and good life

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

Geoffrey Hinton warns that AI might bring negative consequences, including job loss and wealth concentration, which could lead to increased societal violence.

Title:

Content: Meet the honorees ⭐ Mother's Day shopping Take our news quiz 📝 The Crossword
Proud Boys

4 Proud Boys found guilty of seditious conspiracy, latest AI warning: 5 Things podcast

Taylor Wilson
USA TODAY

On today's episode of the 5 Things podcast: Proud Boys, including leader Enrique Tarrio, guilty of seditious conspiracy for Jan. 6

Several Proud Boys have been found guilty of seditious conspiracy for the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. Plus, banking anxieties continue, USA TODAY World Affairs Correspondent Kim Hjelmgaard reports on protests over proposed reforms in Israel, an autopsy reveals Tyre Nichols was killed by blunt force trauma to the head, and USA TODAY Domestic Security Correspondent Josh Meyer looks at the latest debate around artificial intelligence.

Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here

Hit play on the player above to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript below. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text.

Taylor Wilson:

Good morning. I'm Taylor Wilson and this is 5 things you need to know Friday, the 5th of May 2023. Today, a verdict for the Proud Boys. Plus, more bank anxiety, and we hear the latest from protests in Israel.

Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio and three lieutenants were found guilty yesterday of entering a seditious conspiracy against the US government, leading to the January 6th, 2021 Capitol attack. A fifth Proud Boy was acquitted of the charge. Prosecutors said Tarrio was the leader of the plot, despite not being in Washington that day. His arrest two days before the insurrection on unrelated charges and the stabbing of several Proud Boys at a protest in December 2020 served as motivators to try and stop the certification of the 2020 presidential election, according to the government. Tarrio's attorneys argued that he was just the government's scapegoat. They said the true culprit of January 6th was former President Donald Trump.

PacWest Bancorp saw its shares plunge earlier this week, dropping more than 39% at one point. The bank said yesterday that it was considering asset sales and has been approached by several parties about a deal. The bank insists that it has not experienced a high number of customer withdrawals in the wake of the failure and sale of First Republic Bank after a modern day bank run. But anxiety over regional bank stability appeared to spread late this week. Comerica slumped more than 8% and TD Bank Group and First Horizon called off a planned merger citing regulatory hurdles.

Months long protests for and against proposed judicial reforms in Israel will continue this weekend, with tens of thousands expected on the streets of Tel Aviv and elsewhere. Many of the protests are accusing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's right wing coalition of using the reforms to get around the checks and balances of government, and of turning Israel into more of a religious state that could even amount to a dictatorship. Others say they just want their views reflected by a parliament they elected. I sat down with USA TODAY World Affairs Correspondent Kim Hjelmgaard, who recently traveled to Israel, to learn more. Kim, thanks for hopping on 5 Things.

Kim Hjelmgaard:

Thanks for having me.

Taylor Wilson:

Protests have erupted across Israel over these proposed judicial reforms. Some folks opposed to the reforms have said if they're enacted, Israel will not be a democracy anymore. Others even suggest the reforms would make Israel a dictatorship. What's your general perspective on that?

Kim Hjelmgaard:

My general perspective is that Israel is a pretty healthy democracy. Like all democracies, it's not perfect. Constitutional legal scholars say there is space for reform. And this is one of the things that the people who are leading these reforms are saying, look, we can't get laws passed that sort of reflect what our constituents want. The ability to, for example, have separate concerts for men and women, or we can't get laws passed that would allow us to kind of sufficiently build the infrastructure of settlements in the West Bank.

However, it's kind of problematic because if you look at something like a settlement in the West Bank, these things are not legal by international standards. They're often built on Palestinian land.

One of the things about these proposed reforms that the protestors are so angry about has to do with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He's in the middle of a corruption case and he's on trial for it. He's suddenly taken an interest in these reforms because they kind of essentially enable him, through a majority in parliament which his government controls, to kind of get a get out of jail free card a bit. So let's say Netanyahu's convicted, there is the possibility that he can't be removed from power. So the protestors are kind of saying this is just not a healthy thing for a democracy.

Taylor Wilson:

Kim, you mentioned the international community. What is the US government's stance on these reforms and on all of the protests that have happened in recent months?

Kim Hjelmgaard:

US government, as some listeners may be aware, is Israel's biggest source of foreign military aid. The US was the first country in the world to recognize Israel as a country, and the Biden administration has expressed quite publicly, quite loudly, that it does not like the look of these reforms. It feels that they are not democratic, that they're problematic for various reasons.

Taylor Wilson:

And finally, Kim, what's next for these reform proposals and the protests in the coming months?

Kim Hjelmgaard:

Well, things have kind of been stalled since before the Passover holiday, which was last month, when essentially the Parliament went on recess. And Netanyahu, he was kind of faced with this growing escalating insurrection from the Israeli public. There was a series of kind of walkouts from different labor unions, teachers, airport workers went on strike. And they kind of reached this moment where Netanyahu was like, whoa, he needed to calm things down before all of Israeli society kind of unraveled. And so he paused it.

Parliament came back last week. The protestors are still there. The political establishment in Israel is kind of talking about how they're going to try to reach some kind of compromise on this. And nothing has really changed, and it is a kind of standoff where both sides are digging in. But over the last couple of weeks, pro-reform people have started to protest in bigger numbers. A week ago there was about 200,000 of them that showed up outside of the Knesset, which is the Israeli parliament.

So I think everyone in Israel, as far as I can tell, is kind of scratching their heads going, this is not getting any better. In fact, it's getting worse. And one of the places where it could go is another election. And Israel has had five elections since 2019, I believe it is, because they couldn't agree with each other about exactly how to move this country forward. So who knows where that would end up.

Taylor Wilson:

All right. USA TODAY World Affairs Correspondent Kim Hjelmgaard. Thanks so much.

Kim Hjelmgaard:

Thanks for having me.

Taylor Wilson:

An autopsy revealed yesterday that Tyre Nichols was killed by blunt force trauma to the head. The 29-year-old motorist died earlier this year after being brutally beaten by Memphis Police Officers. Nichols' family viewed the autopsy report this week, some four months after Tyre's death. Their attorney, Ben Crump, said the manner of death was homicide. Attorneys said the report was similar to an independent January autopsy that found Nichols suffered extensive bleeding.

♦

Artificial intelligence. No matter how you feel about it, the technology is here. That includes chatbots like ChatGPT, which recently passed a hundred million monthly active users, according to Reuters and others. I spoke with USA TODAY Domestic Security Correspondent Josh Meyer to learn more. Hi there, Josh.

Josh Meyer:

Good to be here. How are you?

Taylor Wilson:

Good, thanks. Thanks for hopping back on. Josh, the Biden White House is concerned about AI being developed by the tech sector and then unleashed on the public with little to no guardrails on how it might be used. What did they say this week?

Josh Meyer:

The Biden administration did have a meeting at the White House, led by Kamala Harris, with some of these tech leaders to talk about some of the reforms that the White House says are needed, including more transparency in the way these companies develop these technologies, giving access to the work in progress by critics and the public, just so they can weigh in on what's happening.

And also, the Biden administration last October released what they called the AI Bill of Rights. That's designed to sort of put more safeguards in place. Right now, that's just a recommendation. And so some critics that say the Biden administration hasn't gone far enough say that that needs to be mandatory, that these companies aren't going to really do much on their own, and that they're going to have to be forced to comply more and to do more in terms of protecting the safety, security, and the privacy of Americans as we go forward.

Taylor Wilson:

And there have been several prominent tech leaders warning about this recently, including the so-called godfather of AI. So Josh, who is the godfather of AI?

Josh Meyer:

The godfather of AI is a guy named Geoffrey Hinton. He's a renowned researcher, vice president at Google. He's also a Toronto professor, and he's spent the last couple of decades at the forefront of innovating and research and development into artificial intelligence and related topics, including ChatGPT.

Taylor Wilson:

And what are some of his concerns about this technology?

Josh Meyer:

He said that his concerns have mostly come about in the last few months, and one of the concerns is that it is becoming so advanced so quickly. One of the things that it's learning to do is simple reasoning. He said that he's concerned that somebody could actually take over the world and push humanity toward extinction.

He was at a seminar yesterday and one of the things that jumped out at me, and everybody else that was there, was he was asked by the panel's moderator, "What's the worst case scenario that you think is conceivable?" And without hesitation, Hinton said, "I think it's quite conceivable that humanity is just a passing phase in the evolution of intelligence."

Taylor Wilson:

Strong words, I would say. Geez.

Josh Meyer:

Yeah. And then he went on to say that even if we think that we're in control of the technology and we can just turn it off, he said it could easily be brought back to life again on another machine if given the proper instructions. And this is another quote from him at the MIT Technology Review conference yesterday. Hinton said, "And it may keep us around for a while to keep the power stations running, but after that, maybe not." So food for thought.

Taylor Wilson:

Yeah, food for thought. So do other experts agree with this pretty pessimistic outlook?

Josh Meyer:

Actually, after he said that, I wanted to find people that would take exception to it, and I talked to a lot of people. I looked around and a lot of people share his concerns. I did find some people that are a little bit more skeptical, including a longtime trusted source of mine who said, "I think that it's overstated. People need to take a step back. Take a deep breath."

I talked to a guy named Michael Hamilton, who's the co-founder of Critical Insight Risk Management. He's a former advisor to the Department of Homeland Security on tech issues. And he said that computer assisted machine learning, including artificial intelligence, will never be the kind of sentient, self-aware and all-knowing technology that people are afraid of, and that created the Terminator of movie fame. He said basically, artificial intelligence is an extremely sophisticated programming platform that can only go as far as humans allow it.

Taylor Wilson:

Josh, one concern is that AI could wipe out thousands, maybe millions of jobs by making them obsolete. What does he say on that point?

Josh Meyer:

Oh yeah, he's very concerned about that. And so is the White House, as a matter of fact, when they rolled out this new initiative. They said that's one of their biggest concerns. And they want to make sure that the developers of AI, which include Google, Microsoft, and some other companies, that they keep that in mind and make sure that there's guardrails there to prevent that kind of thing from happening.

But we do live in a capitalist economy. According to Hinton, he actually spoke very specifically about it, and he said that, we live in a world where profit comes first and the rich could get richer and the poor get poorer because of ways in which AI is used to do menial tasks that are often done by human beings at a lower range of the pay scale. He said, "It's going to cause huge increases in productivity. My worry is for those increases in productivity to put people out of work and make the rich richer and the poor poorer. And as you do that," Hinton said, "you make that gap bigger and society gets more and more violent."

Taylor Wilson:

Josh Meyer, thanks so much.

Josh Meyer:

Sure.

Taylor Wilson:

And happy Cinco de Mayo. The date marks Mexico's victory over the French empire at the Battle of Puebla in 1862.

Thanks for listening to 5 Things. We're produced by Shannon Rae Green, and our executive producer is Laura Beatty. Special thanks to Cherie Saunders and Alexis Gustin. I'm Taylor Wilson back tomorrow with another episode of 5 Things.

Featured Weekly Ad

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

Geoffrey Hinton warned about the disastrous consequences of AI's rapid development, including the potential for AI to take control of us and exacerbate social inequalities, emphasizing that these risks are real and must be taken seriously.

Title:

Content: Information Technology
The father of artificial intelligence urges governments to face its risks before disaster
Jeffrey Hinton, described as the father of artificial intelligence, on Wednesday urged governments to intervene to ensure that machines do not control society.
Hinton made headlines in May when he announced his resignation from Google to speak more freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, shortly after the launch of ChatGPT, which captivated the world.
The artificial intelligence scientist, who is studying at the University of Toronto, spoke to a crowd at the Collagen Technology Conference in the Canadian city.
The conference attracted more than 30,000 startup founders, investors and tech workers, most of whom were eager to learn how to ride the wave of artificial intelligence rather than hear lessons about its risks or calls for governments to intervene.
“Before AI becomes smarter than us, I think the people who develop it should be encouraged to put a lot of effort into understanding how it can try to take control of us, ” Hinton said.
“Now there are 99 highly intelligent people trying to make AI better, and one very intelligent person trying to figure out how to stop it from taking control, and maybe we should be more balanced. ”
Hinton warned that the dangers of artificial intelligence must be taken seriously.
“I think it ’ s important for people to understand that this is not science fiction or just fear, ” he said, adding:“ It ’ s a real risk that we have to think about, and we have to figure out how to deal with it first. ”
Hinton expressed concern that AI would deepen inequality, as the vast gains from its productivity would go to the rich, not the workers.
“Wealth will not go to the people who work, it will make the rich richer, not the poor, and this is a very bad society, ” he said.
He also pointed to the danger of “fake news ” that can be created by robots such as ChatGPT, hoping to mark the content generated by artificial intelligence programs as central banks mark coins.
He stressed that it is important to “try, for example, to distinguish everything that is fake as fake, ” and said,“ I don ’ t know if we can do it technically or not. ”
“The Island Net ”

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Poses ethical risks
Becomes uncontrollable

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.