**Summary Report: Geoffrey Hinton, His Warnings About AI, and Why They Matter**

**1. Who is Geoffrey Hinton and What Has He Done?

**
Geoffrey Hinton is a British-Canadian computer scientist known as the "godfather of AI."

He is one of the pioneers of artificial intelligence and neural networks, especially a type called "deep learning."

His work on how computers can learn (inspired by how the brain works) led to important breakthroughs in AI, powering voice assistants, image recognition, chatbots, and more.

Hinton worked at Google and helped develop much of the AI technology we use today.

What Happened – and What Did Hinton Warn About?

**
In 2023, Hinton publicly resigned from Google to more freely express his concerns about the dangers of advanced AI.

His warnings made headlines because of his reputation: if someone crucial to AI's success is worried, it signals that the risks might be real.

Hinton’s main warnings include:
- **AI could soon become as smart as (or even smarter than) humans.

** He admitted, “Right now, they’re not more intelligent than us, as far as I can tell.

But I think they soon may be.”
- **Rapid progress surprised even experts.

** When AI started to succeed, no one thought progress would come so quickly.

- **AI could threaten jobs and fairness.

** Hinton is worried about jobs being automated, increasing the gap between the rich and poor, and causing social unrest.

- **Risks of misinformation.

** Advanced AI could easily create massive amounts of fake news, manipulate social media, and “create a fake reality on a massive scale.”
- **Existential risks.

** Many experts, including Hinton, now take seriously the small but real risk that AI systems could act in unforeseen, harmful ways, even posing threats as severe as pandemics or nuclear war.

- **We don’t know how to control future AI.

** Unlike climate change, where the problem is clearer, for AI, “it’s not like that.” We don’t yet know how to ensure advanced AI will always behave safely and as intended.

How Did Other Experts and the Public React?

**
- **Agreement and concern:** Many AI leaders (like Yoshua Bengio and Demis Hassabis) have also voiced concerns, warning about catastrophic risks and the need for careful management.

- **Calls for regulation and safety measures:** Over 1000 leaders joined statements urging governments to make “mitigating AI risk” a top global priority.

- **Some skepticism:** Others, like Yann LeCun (another AI pioneer), argue that being intelligent doesn’t mean an AI will automatically seek to dominate or be dangerous, but all agree on the need for oversight.

- **Public worry:** Over half of Americans now believe AI could threaten humanity.

What Should the Public Take Away?

**
- **AI is advancing faster than many imagined,** and with it, both the potential for good and serious risks.

- **Society hasn’t figured out how to safely integrate or regulate AI** on a global scale.

- **Hinton’s warnings call for urgent discussion, science, and policy** to ensure AI benefits society without causing harm.

- Everyday people, governments, and companies must understand that unchecked AI could disrupt jobs, fairness, misinformation, and even safety.

How we manage this technology now may shape the future of society.

**Summary of Key Points: Geoffrey Hinton, AI Risks, and Reactions**

- **Who is Geoffrey Hinton?

**
  - Hinton is often called the "godfather" or "spiritual father" of AI because of his pioneering work in artificial neural networks, which are a key foundation of today’s AI systems, including technologies by Google, OpenAI, and others.

- His research enabled the development of deep learning, leading to advancements like large language models (e.g., ChatGPT).

- **Why Did Hinton’s Resignation Make Headlines?

**
  - Hinton resigned from Google in 2023 to freely discuss the risks and dangers of advanced AI, which he fears may soon outpace human control.

- This was significant because, as someone who contributed so much to AI’s rise, his warnings carry unusual weight and urgency.

- **What Are Hinton’s Main Concerns About AI?

**
  - **Job loss**: He predicts that millions could lose jobs due to automation, as is already happening in some fields.

- **Misinformation & Deception**: AI’s ability to generate credible-sounding answers or content could mislead the public, create propaganda, or sway opinions—sometimes without people realizing it.

- **Autonomy & Goal Formation**: Advanced AIs could develop unexpected sub-goals (such as gaining power) if misaligned with human interests, especially if misused by powerful actors.

- **Difficulty in Regulation**: Calls for regulation exist, but legal systems and codes are still in early stages and lag behind technology.

- **Global Competition**: There’s a race among nations and companies (notably in the US and China) to dominate AI; slowing down could mean losing an economic or military advantage.

- **How Have Other Experts and Companies Responded?

**
  - Some, like Palantir’s CEO, argue that pausing AI research is unrealistic due to global competition—and that only competitors with less-advanced products want to slow things down.

- Multiple prominent AI leaders (including OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman) have also signed warnings about risks to society from unchecked AI.

- OpenAI (creators of ChatGPT) say their goal is AI for humanity’s benefit, developed safely, but their tools already show both positive and disruptive power.

- **Key Public Takeaways:**
  - AI is not only about smart tools—it already affects jobs, information, and even social stability.

- Key risks include mass unemployment, possibility of harmful misinformation, AI being used for manipulation or war, and the challenge of setting up effective regulation.

- The technology is developing rapidly, often outpacing social and legal controls.

- People need to understand that AI’s human-like communication can mislead—even experienced professionals.

- Calls for action include both technical safeguards and meaningful legal oversight, but international agreement and enforcement remain difficult.

- **Overall Context:**
  - Hinton’s warnings sparked global debate because of his stature and the real-world impacts already visible from AI advancements.

The public should stay engaged, understand the stakes, and push for transparent, inclusive policies around AI's deployment and oversight.

Here is a clear, digestible summary of the key points from the extracts, meant to help college students and the general public understand Geoffrey Hinton’s resignation, his concerns, and the broader significance for society:

**Who is Geoffrey Hinton?

**
- Geoffrey Hinton is a renowned computer scientist known as one of the "godfathers" or pioneers of artificial intelligence (AI).

- His work, especially on neural networks, laid the foundation for many of today’s AI technologies, including systems like ChatGPT.

- Hinton worked at Google for a decade, helping develop cutting-edge AI systems.

**Why Did He Resign, and What Are His Warnings?

**
- Hinton resigned from Google in 2023 mainly so he could speak freely about the risks of advanced AI, not to criticize the company.

- He worries that AI development is now outpacing responsible oversight.

- Major concerns include:
  - **Job Losses:** Automation powered by AI could lead to significant job losses, further worsening inequality—the economic gains might flow to the wealthy, not workers.

- **Fake News and Misinformation:** AI tools can generate convincing fake content, making it harder to distinguish true from false information, which could destabilize society.

- **Potential Loss of Human Control:** Advanced AI might eventually “take control” or surpass human intelligence in important domains.

The risk is not just science fiction—bad actors or governments could use AI for harmful purposes or even cyberattacks.

- **Technical and Social Risks:** Hinton questions whether society can really keep up, for example in marking fake AI content, due to the technical challenges involved.

**Other Experts' Responses**
- The tech industry is mostly pushing forward, trying to "ride the AI wave," often focusing on opportunities instead of risks.

- Other AI experts and leaders have echoed Hinton’s concerns, calling for careful regulation, government intervention, and emergency safeguards.

- There’s growing debate: Will AI help humanity, or create new dangers—from loss of jobs and increased inequality to security threats and, in the most extreme scenarios, even risk to human existence?

**What Should the Public Understand?

**
- Hinton’s warnings are taken seriously because of his track record and expertise.

- Even among CEOs and tech leaders, there is significant fear that AI’s advancement could have destructive consequences within a decade.

- Government regulators and independent groups are now starting to call for stronger oversight, including possible limits on how powerful AI systems can become without clear safeguards.

**Bottom Line Takeaways**
- Geoffrey Hinton resigned so he could ring the alarm: AI’s rapid development could have huge consequences for jobs, security, truth, and even control over humanity’s future.

- His call is for more balance—more people working to make AI safe, not just stronger.

- Society must balance innovation with safety, ensuring that the benefits of AI don’t lead to new risks or deepen divides.

- The broader discussion is no longer just for tech experts—it's a fundamental question for our economy, politics, and daily lives.

**Summary of Key Points: Geoffrey Hinton’s Resignation and AI Warnings**

**Who is Geoffrey Hinton?

**
Geoffrey Hinton is a pioneer in artificial intelligence (AI), often called the "godfather of AI."

He has worked on research foundational to current AI systems, particularly through his development of neural networks and deep learning.

These technologies power AI chatbots like Google Bard and OpenAI's ChatGPT.

**What Did Hinton Do at Google?

**
Hinton worked at Google for about 10 years, focusing on AI research and development.

**Summary Report: Geoffrey Hinton, His Warnings About AI, and Why They Matter**

**1. Who is Geoffrey Hinton and What Has He Done?

Title:

Content: The ‘Godfather of AI’ warns about potential dangers of the technology as he quits Google

British-Canadian computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton admits he has fears for the future of AI

In a Frankenstein-esque tale of maker and master, Geoffrey Hinton, 75, dubbed ‘the godfather of AI’, has left Google with a parting warning over the dangers of artificial intelligence.

In 2012, the British-Canadian computer scientist invented technology with two students at University of Toronto that would become the intellectual foundation for AI systems. Google purchased the rights to this neural network tech to the tune of $44 million, which also propelled Dr Hinton to receive the Turing Award in 2018, considered the Nobel Prize of computing.

Read More
The ultimate part-AI girl? One Tatler correspondent entrusts ChatGPT with her next assignment

ChatGPT’s the new It Girl in Town and now she’s got all the gossip, writes Dora Davies-Evitt in the April issue

Yet now, Dr Hinton has packed in the day job at Google to join a chorus of anxious experts demanding a rollback of AI research until more robust safety measures are designed and deployed. Dr Hinton told the BBC: ‘Right now, they’re not more intelligent than us, as far as I can tell. But I think they soon may be.’

While many look upon AI as a natural technological development akin to the internet that could lead to exciting breakthroughs for humanity, there are growing fears that AI is a Pandora’s box. Reflecting on the effects of his work, Dr Hinton said: ‘I console myself with the normal excuse: If I hadn’t done it, somebody would have,’ as he admitted, ‘it is hard to see how you can prevent the bad actors from using it for bad things.’

Read More
Cyber Society: Meet the NFT duo dominating the metaverse

Old Etonian digital artists Dominic Smith and Joe Carnell have caught the attention of Brooklyn Beckham, Steve Aoki and Jaden Smith

The scientist went on to warn that AI could be taught to ‘create sub-goals like “I need to get more power”’, and be harnessed by nefarious actors to wreak havoc. With innovation driven forward by the unstoppable competition between behemoths like Google and Microsoft, Dr Hinton warned innovation will only increase exponentially in the coming years.

There are those who are trying to apply the brakes to this runaway train. In March, an open letter was signed by over 1,000 tech leaders and researchers, including Elon Musk and fellow Turing Award winner Yoshu Bengio, calling for a six-month moratorium on AI development. A few days later, 19 leaders of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence released their own letter on the risks of AI. The signatures included that of Eric Horvitz, chief scientific officer at Microsoft.

The main outcry over AI lies in its ability to create and disseminate false news and images, which the public may find increasingly hard to identify. AI also poses a threat to academia and careers (see: Tatler’s foray into the world of ChatGPT). Dr Hinton believes that AI will fundamentally disrupt the workplace and take over the ‘drudge work’.

Read More
Lady Meta: my stratospheric rise through the metaverse

The Crypto Fashion Week debutante on becoming VR’s favourite It Girl

However Google’s chief scientist, Jeff Dean, offered words of comfort, adding: 'We remain committed to a responsible approach to AI. We’re continually learning to understand emerging risks while also innovating boldly.’

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Which prestigious award did Hinton receive in 2018 for his work on neural networks?

**
Geoffrey Hinton is a British-Canadian computer scientist known as the "godfather of AI."

He is one of the pioneers of artificial intelligence and neural networks, especially a type called "deep learning."

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

His work on how computers can learn (inspired by how the brain works) led to important breakthroughs in AI, powering voice assistants, image recognition, chatbots, and more.

Title:

Content: Presented By
Guido Mieth—Getty Images
Ideas
Otto Barten is director of the Existential Risk Observatory, a nonprofit aiming to reduce existential risk by informing the public debate.
Joep Meindertsma is founder of PauseAI, a movement campaigning for an AI Pause.

The existential risks posed by artificial intelligence (AI) are now widely recognized.

After hundreds of industry and science leaders warned that “mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war,” the U.N. Secretary-General recently echoed their concern. So did the prime minister of the U.K., who is also investing 100 million pounds into AI safety research that is mostly meant to prevent existential risk. Other leaders are likely to follow in recognizing AI’s ultimate threat.

In the scientific field of existential risk, which studies the most likely causes of human extinction, AI is consistently ranked at the top of the list. In The Precipice, a book by Oxford existential risk researcher Toby Ord that aims to quantify human extinction risks, the likeliness of AI leading to human extinction exceeds that of climate change, pandemics, asteroid strikes, supervolcanoes, and nuclear war combined. One would expect that even for severe global problems, the risk that they lead to full human extinction is relatively small, and this is indeed true for most of the above risks. AI, however, may cause human extinction if only a few conditions are met. Among them is human-level AI, defined as an AI that can perform a broad range of cognitive tasks at least as well as we can. Studies outlining these ideas were previously known, but new AI breakthroughs have underlined their urgency: AI may be getting close to human level already.

Recursive self-improvement is one of the reasons why existential-risk academics think human-level AI is so dangerous. Because human-level AI could do almost all tasks at our level, and since doing AI research is one of those tasks, advanced AI should therefore be able to improve the state of AI. Constantly improving AI would create a positive feedback loop with no scientifically established limits: an intelligence explosion. The endpoint of this intelligence explosion could be a superintelligence: a godlike AI that outsmarts us the way humans often outsmart insects. We would be no match for it.

More from TIME

A godlike, superintelligent AI

A superintelligent AI could therefore likely execute any goal it is given. Such a goal would be initially introduced by humans, but might come from a malicious actor, or not have been thought through carefully, or might get corrupted during training or deployment. If the resulting goal conflicts with what is in the best interest of humanity, a superintelligence would aim to execute it regardless. To do so, it could first hack large parts of the internet and then use any hardware connected to it. Or it could use its intelligence to construct narratives that are extremely convincing to us. Combined with hacked access to our social media timelines, it could create a fake reality on a massive scale. As Yuval Harari recently put it: “If we are not careful, we might be trapped behind a curtain of illusions, which we could not tear away—or even realise is there.” As a third option, after either legally making money or hacking our financial system, a superintelligence could simply pay us to perform any actions it needs from us. And these are just some of the strategies a superintelligent AI could use in order to achieve its goals. There are likely many more. Like playing chess against grandmaster Magnus Carlsen, we cannot predict the moves he will play, but we can predict the outcome: we lose.

But why would a superintelligence want to make humanity extinct? In fact, it might not explicitly want that at all. Humanity’s extinction might be a mere side effect of executing another goal to its extremity. When we are executing our own goals as humans, such as food production or growing our economy, we tend to not pay much attention to the effects this has on other species. This routinely leads to the extinction of animal species as a mere side effect of us maximising our goals. In a similar fashion, an uncontrollable superintelligence could lead to our extinction as a side effect of the AI pushing its goals, whatever they may be, to their limits.

Read More: The A to Z of Artificial Intelligence

So how can we avoid AI existential risk? Humanity now faces a stark choice: pause AI at a safe level, or continue development indefinitely. Unsurprisingly, the AI labs want the latter. To continue, however, means literally betting our lives on these labs being able to solve an open scientific problem called AI Alignment.

AI Alignment is the approach that leading labs such as OpenAI, DeepMind, and Anthropic are currently taking to prevent human extinction. AI Alignment does not attempt to control how powerful an AI gets, does not attempt to control what exactly the AI will be doing, and does not even necessarily attempt to prevent a potential takeover from happening. Since the labs anticipate they will not be able to control the superintelligent AI that they are creating, they accept that such an AI will act autonomously and unstoppably, but aim to make it act according to our values. As Richard Ngo, a leading alignment researcher working at OpenAI, puts it, “I doubt we’ll be able to make every single deployment environment secure against the full intellectual powers of a superintelligent AGI.” There are large problems with their alignment approach, however, both fundamentally and technically.

What values should an AI have?

Fundamentally, there is of course no agreement on what values we have. What OpenAI founder Sam Altman wants a superintelligence to do may well be completely different from what, say, a textile worker in Bangladesh wants it to do. Aggregating human preferences has always been a thorny issue even before AI, but will get even more complicated when we have a superintelligence around that might be able to quickly, completely, and globally implement the wishes of a handful of CEOs. Democracy, however imperfect, has been the best solution we can find for value aggregation so far. It is, however, unclear whether our current combination of national political systems can control a godlike AI. In fact, it is unclear whether any organisation or system would be up to the task.

Beyond disagreement over current values, humans have historically not been very good at predicting the future externalities of new technologies. The climate crisis, for one, can be seen as an unforeseen outcome of technologies such as steam and internal combustion engines. Ever more powerful technology has the potential to create ever larger externalities. It is impossible to foresee what the negative side effects will be of actually implementing some interpretation of humanity’s current values. They might make climate change pale in comparison.

There are more unsolved fundamental issues with aligning a superintelligence, but currently, AI companies don’t even get that far. It seems that even making current large neural networks reliably do what anyone wants is a technical problem that we currently cannot solve. This is called inner misalignment and has been observed already in current AI: the model pursues the wrong goal when it is released into the real world after being trained on a limited dataset. For a superintelligence, this could have a catastrophic outcome. This problem is, according to OpenAI’s recent document Governance of Superintelligence, an “open research question.” But not to worry: they say they are “putting a lot of effort” into it.

Read More: The AI Arms Race is Changing Everything

Even if individuals such as Altman care about the existential threats of superintelligence, the current market dynamics of competing AI labs do not incentivize safety. The GPT-4 model built by OpenAI was tested and fine-tuned for seven months before being made public with a detailed report about its safety. Contrary to the safety efforts of OpenAI, a panicked Google released its competing PaLM 2 model just months later, without any mention of similar safety tests. Now even open-source models like Orca are performing at a ChatGPT level, without any safety analysis. The race is frantic, pushing these companies to take more risks to stay ahead. The scope of these risks is gigantic. As Jaan Tallinn, investor of the major AI lab Anthropic, puts it: “I’ve not met anyone in AI labs who says the risk [from training a next-generation model] is less than 1% of blowing up the planet”.

Let us be clear: continuing risky AI development, and eventually undergoing the intelligence explosion that leads to an uncontrollable superintelligence, is a terrible idea. We will not be able to navigate it safely. We lack the technical solutions, the coordination, the insight, the wisdom, and the experience to do something this complex right on the first try. As humans, we are good at solving problems with trial-and-error processes where we get lots of tries. But in the case of an intelligence explosion, we cannot use this strategy, since the first trial of uncontrolled superintelligence could be disastrous.

Why we should pause AI development

So what is the alternative? An AI Pause. This would mean that governments prohibit training any AI model with capabilities likely to exceed GPT-4. This can be determined by examining the amount of computation required for training, corrected over time for improvements in algorithmic efficiency. These leading models can only be trained at large AI companies or data centers, making the enforcement of such a pause realistic.

Since the leading labs are currently located in the U.S. and the U.K., implementing a pause at a national level in those two countries can be done on very short notice. In the medium term, the competitive dynamics between nations will require international legislation and collaboration, where an international AI agency would help. The U.K. is already planning to host an AI safety summit in autumn, which is a fitting moment to sign a treaty that implements an international AI Pause. Excluding important countries, especially China, from such a summit might not be wise, since they will be needed as well in the medium term. For the longer term, hardware regulation—such as making sure new consumer hardware cannot be used for large-scale AI training, while closely monitoring all hardware that can be—is a promising option to practically enforce a pause. Research into this topic needs to be scaled up rapidly to arrive at robust and implementable solutions.

Further AI development may continue only after regulating authorities are convinced that training and deploying a certain AI model will not risk an uncontrolled intelligence explosion or a takeover scenario. Second-order effects, such as making hard-to-control open-source development easier, should be taken into account in such decisions.

Read More: What to Know About Claude 2, Anthropic’s Rival to ChatGPT

Continuing beyond the red line, and thus risking an intelligence explosion or a takeover, should only be allowed after meeting the strictest of requirements. First of all, the technical alignment problem should be decisively solved. Other major issues, such as aggregating humanity’s different value systems, limiting unforeseen externalities, and many more, will also need to be addressed.

A pause may be seen by some as unrealistic. They might say that we cannot stop technological progress for a speculative scenario, that market forces are too strong to counter, or that opposing countries can never coordinate. But bear in mind that as a society, we have barely begun to let the truth sink in: we are risking human extinction here. AI existential risk is still not taken as seriously as it should be. But that is changing. Leading AI academics, such as ‘fathers of AI’ Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio, have sounded public warnings about AI’s existential risk, because they saw the technology getting more capable. This process is unlikely to stop: AI’s capabilities will grow further, and this will lead to more and more debate leaders sounding the alarm bells. When the full weight of our situation sinks in, measures that may appear unrealistic at present, could rapidly gain support.

As humanity, we will realise the situation that we are in. We will come together, and we will find a solution, as we always have. And, sooner than we think, we will implement an AI Pause.

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com.

You May Also Like
EDIT POST

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

Hinton worked at Google and helped develop much of the AI technology we use today.

Title:

Content: Home » Tech » AI Could Match Human Intelligence In Five Years: Google DeepMind CEO
1-MIN READ

AI Could Match Human Intelligence In Five Years: Google DeepMind CEO

Curated By: Shaurya Sharma

News18.com

Last Updated: May 04, 2023, 11:18 IST

New Delhi, India

Experts believe A.I. could match humans very soon. (Representative image/Reuters)

Denis Hassabis, who is the CEO of DeepMind, a startup that was acquired by Google in 2014, has made a bold claim that AI could reach human-level cognition in as little as five years.

2023 is shaping up to be the year of Artificial Intelligence—generative AI chatbots like ChatGPT, Bing, and Google’s Bard are making headlines. Human jobs are at risk, with IBM halting hiring for 7,800 roles. And, the fear of AI surpassing human capabilities persists. Geoffrey Hinton, known as the ‘Godfather of AI,’ left Google citing concerns about its dangers. Despite the benefits that AI can bring, such as increased efficiency and productivity, the fear of AI outpacing humans and becoming too smart for its own good is a fear that has been discussed time and again.

Now, another Google executive, Denis Hassabis, who is the CEO of DeepMind, a startup that was acquired by Google in 2014, has made a bold claim that AI could reach human-level cognition in as little as five years.

Hassabis, speaking at Wall Street Journal’s Future of Everything Festival in New York City, said that the developments in the Artificial Intelligence space shouldn’t be slowed down. “I think we’ll have very capable, very general systems in the next few years,” and he doesn’t “see any reason why that progress is going to slow down. I think it may even accelerate.” He added, “So I think we could be just a few years, maybe within a decade away.”

According to Fortune, Google announced last month that it was merging its core A.I. research team with DeepMind, the startup founded by Demis Hassabis, who would become the CEO of the newly combined unit. Google had acquired DeepMind in 2014.

RELATED NEWS

In related news, Geoffrey Hinton, who’s touted to be the ‘Godfather of AI, quit Google to express his concerns. Hinton, who has won the Turing award, the computer science equivalent of the Nobel prize, has expressed concern that future versions of AI could pose a threat because they often learn unexpected behavior from the vast amounts of data they analyze. This is particularly troubling as AI systems might soon generate and run their own code, which could lead to truly autonomous weapons and killer robots becoming a reality.

Read all the Latest Tech News here

first published:May 04, 2023, 11:18 IST
last updated:May 04, 2023, 11:18 IST

Title:

Content: Meet the honorees ⭐ Mother's Day shopping Take our news quiz 📝 The Crossword
Proud Boys

4 Proud Boys found guilty of seditious conspiracy, latest AI warning: 5 Things podcast

Taylor Wilson
USA TODAY

On today's episode of the 5 Things podcast: Proud Boys, including leader Enrique Tarrio, guilty of seditious conspiracy for Jan. 6

Several Proud Boys have been found guilty of seditious conspiracy for the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. Plus, banking anxieties continue, USA TODAY World Affairs Correspondent Kim Hjelmgaard reports on protests over proposed reforms in Israel, an autopsy reveals Tyre Nichols was killed by blunt force trauma to the head, and USA TODAY Domestic Security Correspondent Josh Meyer looks at the latest debate around artificial intelligence.

Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here

Hit play on the player above to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript below. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text.

Taylor Wilson:

Good morning. I'm Taylor Wilson and this is 5 things you need to know Friday, the 5th of May 2023. Today, a verdict for the Proud Boys. Plus, more bank anxiety, and we hear the latest from protests in Israel.

Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio and three lieutenants were found guilty yesterday of entering a seditious conspiracy against the US government, leading to the January 6th, 2021 Capitol attack. A fifth Proud Boy was acquitted of the charge. Prosecutors said Tarrio was the leader of the plot, despite not being in Washington that day. His arrest two days before the insurrection on unrelated charges and the stabbing of several Proud Boys at a protest in December 2020 served as motivators to try and stop the certification of the 2020 presidential election, according to the government. Tarrio's attorneys argued that he was just the government's scapegoat. They said the true culprit of January 6th was former President Donald Trump.

PacWest Bancorp saw its shares plunge earlier this week, dropping more than 39% at one point. The bank said yesterday that it was considering asset sales and has been approached by several parties about a deal. The bank insists that it has not experienced a high number of customer withdrawals in the wake of the failure and sale of First Republic Bank after a modern day bank run. But anxiety over regional bank stability appeared to spread late this week. Comerica slumped more than 8% and TD Bank Group and First Horizon called off a planned merger citing regulatory hurdles.

Months long protests for and against proposed judicial reforms in Israel will continue this weekend, with tens of thousands expected on the streets of Tel Aviv and elsewhere. Many of the protests are accusing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's right wing coalition of using the reforms to get around the checks and balances of government, and of turning Israel into more of a religious state that could even amount to a dictatorship. Others say they just want their views reflected by a parliament they elected. I sat down with USA TODAY World Affairs Correspondent Kim Hjelmgaard, who recently traveled to Israel, to learn more. Kim, thanks for hopping on 5 Things.

Kim Hjelmgaard:

Thanks for having me.

Taylor Wilson:

Protests have erupted across Israel over these proposed judicial reforms. Some folks opposed to the reforms have said if they're enacted, Israel will not be a democracy anymore. Others even suggest the reforms would make Israel a dictatorship. What's your general perspective on that?

Kim Hjelmgaard:

My general perspective is that Israel is a pretty healthy democracy. Like all democracies, it's not perfect. Constitutional legal scholars say there is space for reform. And this is one of the things that the people who are leading these reforms are saying, look, we can't get laws passed that sort of reflect what our constituents want. The ability to, for example, have separate concerts for men and women, or we can't get laws passed that would allow us to kind of sufficiently build the infrastructure of settlements in the West Bank.

However, it's kind of problematic because if you look at something like a settlement in the West Bank, these things are not legal by international standards. They're often built on Palestinian land.

One of the things about these proposed reforms that the protestors are so angry about has to do with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He's in the middle of a corruption case and he's on trial for it. He's suddenly taken an interest in these reforms because they kind of essentially enable him, through a majority in parliament which his government controls, to kind of get a get out of jail free card a bit. So let's say Netanyahu's convicted, there is the possibility that he can't be removed from power. So the protestors are kind of saying this is just not a healthy thing for a democracy.

Taylor Wilson:

Kim, you mentioned the international community. What is the US government's stance on these reforms and on all of the protests that have happened in recent months?

Kim Hjelmgaard:

US government, as some listeners may be aware, is Israel's biggest source of foreign military aid. The US was the first country in the world to recognize Israel as a country, and the Biden administration has expressed quite publicly, quite loudly, that it does not like the look of these reforms. It feels that they are not democratic, that they're problematic for various reasons.

Taylor Wilson:

And finally, Kim, what's next for these reform proposals and the protests in the coming months?

Kim Hjelmgaard:

Well, things have kind of been stalled since before the Passover holiday, which was last month, when essentially the Parliament went on recess. And Netanyahu, he was kind of faced with this growing escalating insurrection from the Israeli public. There was a series of kind of walkouts from different labor unions, teachers, airport workers went on strike. And they kind of reached this moment where Netanyahu was like, whoa, he needed to calm things down before all of Israeli society kind of unraveled. And so he paused it.

Parliament came back last week. The protestors are still there. The political establishment in Israel is kind of talking about how they're going to try to reach some kind of compromise on this. And nothing has really changed, and it is a kind of standoff where both sides are digging in. But over the last couple of weeks, pro-reform people have started to protest in bigger numbers. A week ago there was about 200,000 of them that showed up outside of the Knesset, which is the Israeli parliament.

So I think everyone in Israel, as far as I can tell, is kind of scratching their heads going, this is not getting any better. In fact, it's getting worse. And one of the places where it could go is another election. And Israel has had five elections since 2019, I believe it is, because they couldn't agree with each other about exactly how to move this country forward. So who knows where that would end up.

Taylor Wilson:

All right. USA TODAY World Affairs Correspondent Kim Hjelmgaard. Thanks so much.

Kim Hjelmgaard:

Thanks for having me.

Taylor Wilson:

An autopsy revealed yesterday that Tyre Nichols was killed by blunt force trauma to the head. The 29-year-old motorist died earlier this year after being brutally beaten by Memphis Police Officers. Nichols' family viewed the autopsy report this week, some four months after Tyre's death. Their attorney, Ben Crump, said the manner of death was homicide. Attorneys said the report was similar to an independent January autopsy that found Nichols suffered extensive bleeding.

♦

Artificial intelligence. No matter how you feel about it, the technology is here. That includes chatbots like ChatGPT, which recently passed a hundred million monthly active users, according to Reuters and others. I spoke with USA TODAY Domestic Security Correspondent Josh Meyer to learn more. Hi there, Josh.

Josh Meyer:

Good to be here. How are you?

Taylor Wilson:

Good, thanks. Thanks for hopping back on. Josh, the Biden White House is concerned about AI being developed by the tech sector and then unleashed on the public with little to no guardrails on how it might be used. What did they say this week?

Josh Meyer:

The Biden administration did have a meeting at the White House, led by Kamala Harris, with some of these tech leaders to talk about some of the reforms that the White House says are needed, including more transparency in the way these companies develop these technologies, giving access to the work in progress by critics and the public, just so they can weigh in on what's happening.

And also, the Biden administration last October released what they called the AI Bill of Rights. That's designed to sort of put more safeguards in place. Right now, that's just a recommendation. And so some critics that say the Biden administration hasn't gone far enough say that that needs to be mandatory, that these companies aren't going to really do much on their own, and that they're going to have to be forced to comply more and to do more in terms of protecting the safety, security, and the privacy of Americans as we go forward.

Taylor Wilson:

And there have been several prominent tech leaders warning about this recently, including the so-called godfather of AI. So Josh, who is the godfather of AI?

Josh Meyer:

The godfather of AI is a guy named Geoffrey Hinton. He's a renowned researcher, vice president at Google. He's also a Toronto professor, and he's spent the last couple of decades at the forefront of innovating and research and development into artificial intelligence and related topics, including ChatGPT.

Taylor Wilson:

And what are some of his concerns about this technology?

Josh Meyer:

He said that his concerns have mostly come about in the last few months, and one of the concerns is that it is becoming so advanced so quickly. One of the things that it's learning to do is simple reasoning. He said that he's concerned that somebody could actually take over the world and push humanity toward extinction.

He was at a seminar yesterday and one of the things that jumped out at me, and everybody else that was there, was he was asked by the panel's moderator, "What's the worst case scenario that you think is conceivable?" And without hesitation, Hinton said, "I think it's quite conceivable that humanity is just a passing phase in the evolution of intelligence."

Taylor Wilson:

Strong words, I would say. Geez.

Josh Meyer:

Yeah. And then he went on to say that even if we think that we're in control of the technology and we can just turn it off, he said it could easily be brought back to life again on another machine if given the proper instructions. And this is another quote from him at the MIT Technology Review conference yesterday. Hinton said, "And it may keep us around for a while to keep the power stations running, but after that, maybe not." So food for thought.

Taylor Wilson:

Yeah, food for thought. So do other experts agree with this pretty pessimistic outlook?

Josh Meyer:

Actually, after he said that, I wanted to find people that would take exception to it, and I talked to a lot of people. I looked around and a lot of people share his concerns. I did find some people that are a little bit more skeptical, including a longtime trusted source of mine who said, "I think that it's overstated. People need to take a step back. Take a deep breath."

I talked to a guy named Michael Hamilton, who's the co-founder of Critical Insight Risk Management. He's a former advisor to the Department of Homeland Security on tech issues. And he said that computer assisted machine learning, including artificial intelligence, will never be the kind of sentient, self-aware and all-knowing technology that people are afraid of, and that created the Terminator of movie fame. He said basically, artificial intelligence is an extremely sophisticated programming platform that can only go as far as humans allow it.

Taylor Wilson:

Josh, one concern is that AI could wipe out thousands, maybe millions of jobs by making them obsolete. What does he say on that point?

Josh Meyer:

Oh yeah, he's very concerned about that. And so is the White House, as a matter of fact, when they rolled out this new initiative. They said that's one of their biggest concerns. And they want to make sure that the developers of AI, which include Google, Microsoft, and some other companies, that they keep that in mind and make sure that there's guardrails there to prevent that kind of thing from happening.

But we do live in a capitalist economy. According to Hinton, he actually spoke very specifically about it, and he said that, we live in a world where profit comes first and the rich could get richer and the poor get poorer because of ways in which AI is used to do menial tasks that are often done by human beings at a lower range of the pay scale. He said, "It's going to cause huge increases in productivity. My worry is for those increases in productivity to put people out of work and make the rich richer and the poor poorer. And as you do that," Hinton said, "you make that gap bigger and society gets more and more violent."

Taylor Wilson:

Josh Meyer, thanks so much.

Josh Meyer:

Sure.

Taylor Wilson:

And happy Cinco de Mayo. The date marks Mexico's victory over the French empire at the Battle of Puebla in 1862.

Thanks for listening to 5 Things. We're produced by Shannon Rae Green, and our executive producer is Laura Beatty. Special thanks to Cherie Saunders and Alexis Gustin. I'm Taylor Wilson back tomorrow with another episode of 5 Things.

Featured Weekly Ad

What is the AI problem called confabulation, according to Hinton?

It's when AI makes up plausible answers to questions it can't answer.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

What Happened – and What Did Hinton Warn About?

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

**
In 2023, Hinton publicly resigned from Google to more freely express his concerns about the dangers of advanced AI.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

His warnings made headlines because of his reputation: if someone crucial to AI's success is worried, it signals that the risks might be real.

Title:

Content: Yoshua Bengio

1 minute read
By Geoffrey Hinton

Yoshua Bengio is a world leader in AI. Throughout his career, Yoshua’s research has been instrumental in shaping the world’s understanding of AI’s potential—and that same expertise has made his perspective more essential than ever. His pioneering research on deep learning laid the foundations for the current revolution in AI and earned him the 2018 Turing Award—“the Nobel Prize of Computing”—alongside myself and Yann LeCun. Last year, Yoshua received Canada’s highest award for research, the Gerhard Herzberg Canada Gold Medal. He is the computer scientist with the greatest number of citations and is ranked third among all disciplines for scientific impact.

Yoshua has been concerned for many years with the social impact of artificial intelligence, contributing to the Montreal Declaration for the Responsible Development of AI. Over the past year, worried by the potential for catastrophic outcomes from future AI, he was vocal in global conversations on AI safety. He advised the U.N. Secretary-General and the U.K. AI Safety Institute, and took part in policy discussions with governments in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Hinton is a cognitive psychologist and computer scientist

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Hinton’s main warnings include:
- **AI could soon become as smart as (or even smarter than) humans.

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

** He admitted, “Right now, they’re not more intelligent than us, as far as I can tell.

What about AI makes regulation seen as premature, leading few countries to act despite global calls?

But I think they soon may be.”
- **Rapid progress surprised even experts.

** When AI started to succeed, no one thought progress would come so quickly.

Title:

Content: Wednesday, December 13, 2023
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

John Riopelle — obituary

Riopelle, John William It is with great sadness...

A.I. doesn’t bleed

by John Clinton, Ramsay New knowledge merges with...

Breakfast at the Legion, December 16

At the Almonte Legion Sat. December 16 Eggs to...
Science & NatureA.I. doesn't bleed

A.I. doesn’t bleed

by John Clinton, Ramsay

New knowledge merges with old; what you know shapes what you learn. Artificial neural networks have been studied and computer algorithms have been generated to understand how artificial, computer-generated, neurons, would store a concept, and how it would revise that concept if it was flawed.

Geoffrey Hinton, a computer scientist often called ‘the godfather of AI,’ is a leading figure in neural networks; studies inspired by the way neurons are connected in the human brain. A New Yorker magazine piece describes his collaborative work in the 1960s and 1970s developing neural nets that couldn’t do anything better than a child. The technology suddenly improved about a decade ago with the large increase in processing speed and Internet data availability.

According to Google Scholar, Hinton is the second most cited researcher among psychologists and the most cited among computer and cognitive scientists.

Hinton has been worried about the potential of AI to do harm and he often talks about the existential threat that AI might pose to the human species. He has used OpenAI’s ChatGPT and this has made him uneasy. He wrote “Fox News is an oxymoron” asking ChatGPT to explain the joke. (Initial reading of this caused me to ponder – a moron full of oxygen??) The first reply told him that this implied Fox News was fake news. When he called attention to the space between oxy and moron, it explained that Fox News was addictive, like the drug OxyContin. To him, this level of understanding represents a new era in AI.

In nature, wildlife learns how to be intelligent without access to concepts expressed in words. They learn to be smart (survive) through experience. Learning, not knowledge, is the engine of intelligence. There is no use trying to explain complicated ideas that you do not understand. First, you must understand how something works. Otherwise, you just produce nonsense.

Because neural networks are so strange, no one can predict how useful – or dangerous – AI will become. OpenAI’s GPT models involve billions of artificial neurons (data) which are profoundly different than biological brains. They are not alive. Our intuitions tell us that nothing resident in a browser tab could really be thinking in the way we do.

Because a human brain can run on oatmeal, the world can support billions of brains, all different. Each brain can learn continuously, rather than being trained once, then pushed out into the world (ship it!).

If the brain dies, the knowledge dies. If a computer dies, load up another computer. Ten thousand neural nets can learn ten thousand different things at the same time and share what they have learned. This immortality (knowledge perpetuity) and replicability suggest we should be concerned about digital intelligence taking over from biological intelligence.

Current AI technology is talkative and intellectual. The problems of physical intuition will be the challenge of the next decade says Yann LeCun, a French computer scientist. A teenager can learn to drive a car in twenty hours of practice with little supervision. AI systems don’t come close to doing this – except self-driving cars – and they are over-engineered, requiring the mapping of whole cities, hundreds of engineers, and hundreds of thousands of hours of training.

And then there is the problem of what some researchers call AI ‘hallucination’, which Hinton names ‘confabulation.’ AI systems confabulate by making up plausible answers to questions that stump them. In the human mind, there is no boundary between just making it up and telling the truth. Telling the truth is just making it up correctly. ChatGPT’s ability to make things up is a flaw, but also a sign of its humanlike intelligence.

When Hinton began his research, no one thought the technology would succeed. When it started to succeed, no one thought it would succeed so quickly. He expects AI will contribute to many fields, but he fears what will happen when powerful people abuse it. Think autonomous weapons. Hinton warns that even benign autonomous systems could wreak havoc. Yann LeCun has said there is an idea that if a system is intelligent it is going to want to dominate. But the desire to dominate has nothing to do with intelligence – it has to do with testosterone.

Recently, Hinton did not sign a popular petition that called for at least a six-month pause in AI research.

“China is not going to stop development for six months.”

“So what should we do?”

“I don’t know. If this were like climate change where we either must stop burning carbon or find a way to remove carbon from the atmosphere, we know what the solution looks like. Here, with AI, it’s not like that.”

Think of the AI story in which our intuitions about the specialness of the human mind are being dislodged by thinking machines, or, having stolen fire, we risk being burned.

Are we fooling ourselves, being taken in by our own machines and the companies that hope to profit from them? By seeking to re-create the knowledge systems in our heads, have we seized the forbidden apple? Have we risked exile from our charmed world? But who would choose not to know how knowing works?

Related

FOLLOW US

Latest

From the Archives

- **AI could threaten jobs and fairness.

Title:

Content: Presented By
Getty Images
Ideas
Jan Brauner is a Ph.D. researcher in Artificial Intelligence at the University of Oxford, focusing on the safety of AI systems and their application in public health.
Alan Chan is a Ph.D. student at Mila, a research institute in Montreal focusing on AI, where he works on technical and socio-technical problems in AI safety. He's particularly interested in evaluation and AI regulation.

In May, more than 100 artificial intelligence (AI) professors, including some of the field's leading experts, scholars from other areas, and AI executives signed a one-sentence statement: "Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.” Many signing researchers have explained their reason for worry: the risk that we might build powerful AI systems that we cannot control within this decade or the next ones.

Some have suggested the statement is an industry ploy to hype up AI companies’ products or influence regulation, ignoring that most of the signatories—ourselves included—are academics who do not work for industry. But the most common concern we have heard is that, by focusing on the risk of extinction, the statement distracts from present-day AI harms. As volunteers involved in collecting signatures for and constructing the statement, we disagree because both problems share a common core. The false dichotomy between ongoing harms and emergent risks makes it needlessly difficult to address common root causes.

AI poses many ongoing problems. AI systems can sustain human rights abuses, perpetuate systemic discrimination, and entrench power imbalances. Because AI systems are often widely deployed, harms can reach massive scales. For example, tens of thousands of families were pushed into poverty when the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration wrongly accused them of fraud and requested they pay back large sums of money, based on risk profiles created with AI systems.

The root causes of AI harm

There are several root causes that contribute to many instances of the harm caused by AI. One is that we do not know how to design AI systems that reliably behave exactly as we intend them to. For example, a health system was designed to allocate care based on need but discriminated against Black hospital patients. It turned out the algorithm used health care costs as a proxy for need, but institutionalized racism means that less money has been spent on Black patients historically. In many similar cases, companies do not explicitly set out to build harmful AI systems. Instead, creating state-of-the-art AI systems requires vast amounts of data, and the AI systems unintendedly inherit the biases encoded in this data.

Another cause is competitive pressures and limited accountability. There is often a strong economic incentive to deploy AI systems without sufficient safety checks. For example, Microsoft rushed the release of the Bing chatbot, which resulted in the chatbot threatening and insulting users. When the Dutch Tax Administration replaced human judgment with AI systems, this, too, happened in the name of efficiency.

Without decisive action to address these root causes, increasingly powerful and widely deployed AI systems will cause even more pervasive and significant harm. Many experts believe future AI systems may outmatch humans in crucial cognitive skills, such as social persuasion, planning, and development of novel technologies. Just as these cognitive abilities enabled humanity to control the fate of other species, the same skills could enable smarter AI systems to out-perform us. Given competition and limited accountability, there would be pressure on organizations to replace expensive human labor with AI systems. Economic forces encourage the rapid deployment of new AI systems (at the cost of safety testing), making them ever more powerful, building general (and potentially more powerful) systems rather than narrow (and potentially more controllable) systems, and increasing the autonomy of AI systems to take action in the world. AI systems could increasingly control our society's key productive, managerial, and military capacities. By then, we must have figured out how to design systems that always and truly behave as we intend. Otherwise, powerful AI systems that pursue goals at odds with humanity could lead to human marginalization or even extinction.

Read More: An AI Pause is Humanity's Best Bet for Preventing Extinction

Moreover, many researchers expect us to develop such advanced AI systems very soon. Companies are pouring more money and talent into AI development while the cost of computing power is decreasing. Simply using more computing power and data has reliably produced more capable AI systems, while AI algorithms have also improved. After seeing the rapid progress in AI over the past five years, Geoffrey Hinton, a founding father of modern AI, now expects that AI could broadly surpass human cognitive abilities—such as persuasion, planning, and scientific reasoning—within five to 20 years. Such time horizons are shared by many in the AI research community.

Twenty years is short; in discussions about the climate crisis, we regularly consider effects on such timescales. And just as climate change requires us to face air pollution and ongoing natural disasters as well as prevent future, even more, extreme weather events, we must tackle various AI risks and harms simultaneously. Even if we might be a couple of decades away from AI systems that are smarter than humans, that is little time to create the complex global governance structures necessary for this technology.

Work to address ongoing harms sometimes differs from work to manage extinction risk. We do not wish to erase nuance or potential differences between the perspectives. Yet, given common root causes, there is much room for collaboration and cooperation.

Four possible interventions

Many interventions could address the root problems. First, the public currently has little to no say over what models are built and how they are deployed. For example, those most affected by welfare systems have had little say in their automation. Private companies decide which risks are acceptable, as they have free rein over computing power and data, the key levers of AI development. Stronger democratic oversight over the supply of computing power and data would enhance public control over AI development and associated risks. For example, governments can monitor when large amounts of computing power are being used and for what purpose.

Second, a strong auditing regime, where independent third-parties would scrutinize the practices and development processes of AI labs, would help reduce risks overall. Auditing has already surfaced previously overlooked harms, such as bias in facial recognition, and could catch future failure modes like AI systems subverting human control or replicating autonomously. A standards body could ensure  AI systems, both before and after deployment, meet specified safety guidelines. Domestic agencies could enforce compliance, while an international organization would create universal standards.

Third, we should require meaningful human oversight of critical AI decisions, and avoid very-high-risk use cases such as lethal autonomous weapons. Uncertainty about AI systems' current and near-future capabilities means we should proceed cautiously around their deployment in critical domains.

Fourth, we should rebalance the  funding going into AIs and urge companies to spend less on making them smarter while increasing funding into making them safer, more transparent, and studying their social impacts. While it is good that industry labs are funding such research, this funding is liable to change with market conditions. Much more public funding for non-industry groups is required.

The development of increasingly powerful AI systems poses increasingly vast societal-scale risks. The complexity of these risks requires cooperation between people with potentially different motivations but with a shared interest in ensuring that AI development proceeds in a just and beneficial way.

More Must-Reads From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com.

You May Also Like
EDIT POST

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

** Hinton is worried about jobs being automated, increasing the gap between the rich and poor, and causing social unrest.

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

- **Risks of misinformation.

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

** Advanced AI could easily create massive amounts of fake news, manipulate social media, and “create a fake reality on a massive scale.”
- **Existential risks.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

** Many experts, including Hinton, now take seriously the small but real risk that AI systems could act in unforeseen, harmful ways, even posing threats as severe as pandemics or nuclear war.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Poses ethical risks
Becomes uncontrollable

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

- **We don’t know how to control future AI.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

** Unlike climate change, where the problem is clearer, for AI, “it’s not like that.” We don’t yet know how to ensure advanced AI will always behave safely and as intended.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What is the AI problem called confabulation, according to Hinton?

It's when AI makes up plausible answers to questions it can't answer.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

How Did Other Experts and the Public React?

**
- **Agreement and concern:** Many AI leaders (like Yoshua Bengio and Demis Hassabis) have also voiced concerns, warning about catastrophic risks and the need for careful management.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Poses ethical risks
Becomes uncontrollable

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

- **Calls for regulation and safety measures:** Over 1000 leaders joined statements urging governments to make “mitigating AI risk” a top global priority.

- **Some skepticism:** Others, like Yann LeCun (another AI pioneer), argue that being intelligent doesn’t mean an AI will automatically seek to dominate or be dangerous, but all agree on the need for oversight.

What does AI expert, Yann LeCun, say about doomsday warnings regarding AI?

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

- **Public worry:** Over half of Americans now believe AI could threaten humanity.

Title:

Content: More Than Half of Americans Think AI Poses a Threat to Humanity

AI is the talk of the town these days. But despite the technology’s impressive accomplishments—or perhaps because of them—not all of that talk is positive. There was a New York Times tech columnist’s piece about his unsettling interaction with ChatGPT in February; an open letter calling for a moratorium on AI research in March; “godfather of AI” Geoffrey Hinton’s dramatic resignation from Google and warning about the dangers of AI; and just this week, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s testimony before Congress, in which he said his “worst fear is we cause significant harm to the world” and encouraged legislation around the technology (though he also argued that generative AI should be treated differently, which would be convenient for his company).

It seems these warnings (along with all the other media circulating on the topic) have reached the American public loud and clear, and people don’t quite know what to think—but many are getting nervous. A poll carried out last week by Reuters revealed that more than half of Americans believe AI poses a threat to humanity’s future.

The poll was conducted online between May 9 and May 15, with 4,415 adults participating, and the results were published yesterday. More than two-thirds of respondents expressed concern about possible negative impacts of AI, while 61 percent believe it could be a threat to civilization.

“It’s telling such a broad swatch of Americans worry about the negative effects of AI,” said Landon Klein, director of US policy at the Future of Life Institute, the organization behind the previously mentioned open letter. “We view the current moment similar to the beginning of the nuclear era, and we have the benefit of public perception that is consistent with the need to take action.”

One nebulous aspect of the poll, and of many of the headlines about AI we see on a daily basis, is how the technology is defined. What are we referring to when we say “AI”? The term encompasses everything from recommendation algorithms that serve up content on YouTube and Netflix, to large language models like ChatGPT, to models that can design incredibly complex protein architectures, to the Siri assistant built into many iPhones.

IBM’s definition is simple: “a field which combines computer science and robust datasets to enable problem-solving.” Google, meanwhile, defines it as “a set of technologies that enable computers to perform a variety of advanced functions, including the ability to see, understand and translate spoken and written language, analyze data, make recommendations, and more.”

It could be that peoples’ fear and distrust of AI comes partly from a lack of understanding of it, and a stronger focus on unsettling examples than positive ones. The AI that can design complex proteins may help scientists discover stronger vaccines and other drugs, and could do so on a vastly accelerated timeline.

In fact, biotechnology and medicine are two fields for which AI holds enormous promise, be it by modeling millions of proteins, coming up with artificial enzymes, powering brain implants that help disabled people communicate, or helping diagnose conditions like Alzheimer’s.

Sebastian Thrun, a computer science professor at Stanford who founded Google X, pointed out that there’s not enough public awareness of the potential for positive impact AI has. “The concerns are very legitimate, but I think what’s missing in the dialogue in general is why are we doing this in the first place?” he said. “AI will raise peoples’ quality of life, and help people be more competent and more efficient.”

While 61 percent of the poll’s respondents said AI could be a risk to humanity, only 22 percent said it won’t be a risk; the other 17 percent weren’t sure.

However, the (sort of?) good news is that AI isn’t the biggest thing Americans are losing sleep over. The top worry at the moment is, unsurprisingly, the economy (82 percent of respondents fear a looming recession), with crime coming in second (77 percent said they support increasing police funding to fight crime).

If an AI solution came along that could, say, point out economic strategies humans haven’t yet thought of, would that make people less wary of it?

Given everything else the tech can do, this doesn’t seem like such a long shot.

Image Credit: Google DeepMind / Unsplash

Vanessa Bates Ramirez
Vanessa is senior editor of Singularity Hub. She's interested in biotechnology and genetic engineering, the nitty-gritty of the renewable energy transition, the roles technology and science play in geopolitics and international development, and countless other topics.
RELATED
latest
Don't miss a trend
Get Hub delivered to your inbox

featured

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

What is the AI problem called confabulation, according to Hinton?

It's when AI makes up plausible answers to questions it can't answer.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

What Should the Public Take Away?

Title:

Content: Google seeks to fix fairness in AI technology

By Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press, Toronto

Automation / Robotics Electronics AI artificial intelligence Google Technology

But artificial intelligence still has biases echoed by society

An artificial intelligence researcher at Google says fixing fairness in the technology “isn’t a simple thing,” but the world has an opportunity to get it right as the software explodes in popularity.

“It’s as though we have been given a second chance on how we use this technology to dismantle some of the biases we see in society,” Komal Singh, a senior product manager at the tech goliath, said in a Tuesday media briefing in Toronto.

Her optimism comes as the tech sector – and nearly every other industry – have spent the year abuzz about AI’s promise and perils.

Source: Getty Images

Some see the technology as a game changer bound to disrupt everyday life and bring expediency, efficiency and solutions to some of the globe’s biggest challenges. Others, including Tesla owner Elon Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, warn advances in the technology are moving too fast and guardrails are needed before wide-scale deployments.

Advertisement

Geoffrey Hinton, the British-Canadian computer scientist widely considered the `godfather of AI’, is so concerned with the technology he left Google so he can more freely discuss the dangers, which he has said include bias and discrimination, joblessness, echo chambers, fake news, battle robots and existential risk. Singh acknowledged AI is not without risks. She’s even seen them firsthand. For example, she said if you ask an AI model to generate an image of a nurse it will often return a woman, while a request for an image of a CEO typically brings up a white man and a query for a software engineer delivers racialized men.

A lot needs to happen to fix the fairness

“In a nutshell, I think the takeaway is a lot needs to happen to fix the fairness problem,” Singh said.

At Google, some of that work has come from studying skin tones because dark and medium tones often can’t be deciphered by computer vision systems, which allow computers to “see and understand” images of people and environments.

“This is problematic because a lot of the social disparities around colourism then get populated into social technical systems, which then end up reinforcing them,” Singh said.

To break the cycle, Google partnered with Harvard University professor, Dr. Ellis Monk to design an open-source skin tone scale that can better detect darker tones and be used by AI models to reduce biases. It’s already been deployed within its camera detection technology, on Pixel phones and in search tools, helping to diversify results so keywords bring up a range of skin tones and hair textures. The company also has a project called Media Understanding for Social Exploration, which studied 12 years of American television shows to analyze representation across skin tones.

Racing to develop and launch the most advanced technology

Their findings were “stark,” Singh said. Over the past 12 years, there was a slight increase in the screen time given to those with dark and medium skin tones, while the amount of time those with lighter skin spent on screen was slightly lower. Such work comes at a pivotal time for AI. Top tech companies are racing to develop and launch the most advanced technology, competing with one another for billions of dollars pouring into the industry.

In Canada, Google estimates generative AI could increase the economy by $210 billion and save the average worker over 100 hours a year. Google leaders accompanying Singh said they’re already using AI to improve breast cancer detection, sequence genomes and develop systems that medical clinicians can plug questions into to generate health guidance. E-commerce giant Shopify Inc. is using the technology to reduce search abandonment, while Canadian National Railway Co. is building a digital supply chain platform with automated shipment tracking, Google workers said.

At Google, AI underpins the company’s search engine, maps and cloud storage and is the basis for Bard, its rival product to ChatGPT, that has yet to launch in Canada. Sam Sebastian, the head of Google Cloud’s Canadian operations, promised it would make its Canadian debut “very soon,” but offered no specific timeline. Instead, he discussed his overall outlook on AI, saying it was a technological shift unlike anything he’s seen in his 25 years working in the industry.

“The only thing close to it is the advent of the mobile phone,” he said.

The transformative nature means anyone in the space needs to balance AI’s potential with its risks, he said. For its part, Google has committed to abide by a series of principles as it delves deeper into AI. It has so far promised not to design or deploy AI technologies that cause or are likely to harm, including weapons or systems used to inflict injuries. It also says it will not work on AI-based “surveillance violating internationally accepted norms” or systems which will contravene laws and human rights.

Advertisement

Stories continue below

Print this page

Related Stories

**
- **AI is advancing faster than many imagined,** and with it, both the potential for good and serious risks.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

- **Society hasn’t figured out how to safely integrate or regulate AI** on a global scale.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Poses ethical risks
Becomes uncontrollable

- **Hinton’s warnings call for urgent discussion, science, and policy** to ensure AI benefits society without causing harm.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

- Everyday people, governments, and companies must understand that unchecked AI could disrupt jobs, fairness, misinformation, and even safety.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

How we manage this technology now may shape the future of society.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

**Summary of Key Points: Geoffrey Hinton, AI Risks, and Reactions**

- **Who is Geoffrey Hinton?

Title:

Content: Eight threats of artificial intelligence
Roman Romanov
31 May 2023, 18: 52
According to the non-profit organization Center for AI Safety (CAIS), artificial intelligence can lead to the disappearance of humanity.
This is not the first warning of this kind.
In a relatively short time, several reputable scientists and entrepreneurs have claimed the destructive potential of artificial intelligence.
In addition to social significance, the issue of AI risk management also has geopolitical content.
piqsels.com
What to be afraid of?
The American “AI Security Center ” published an official statement.
It details a number of negative effects of the use of AI, which could eventually lead to the disappearance of humanity.
“A more advanced AI could pose catastrophic and existential risks, ” reads the text published on the organization ’ s website.
Eight threats have been identified.
The first is related to the military application of artificial intelligence technologies: “Unlike other types of weapons, AI systems capable of causing harm can be easily distributed digitally. ”
The second is disinformation: “… all this can undermine the collective decision-making system, radicalize individuals … ”.
The third risk is the distortion of the work of recommendation algorithms.
These systems, for example, offer us additional products on online marketplaces.
The fear is that more advanced models will focus on simplifying the process of predicting the desires of the buyer, which can cause people to develop bad habits and so on.
The fourth threat is associated with a sharp increase in the dependence of people on advanced systems, up to the delegation of the most ordinary tasks to them.
The fifth is an even greater concentration of wealth and influence in the hands of a limited number of people who can use it to monopolize power in society.
The sixth threat is the emergence of goals and abilities.
In other words, models can set new goals and develop skills that are not foreseen during their training.
The seventh is related to the deception by AI.
The statement cites an example where Volkswagen programmed engines to show low emissions only during inspections.
In the same way, according to experts, artificial intelligence can do.
The eighth and, perhaps, the biggest threat is the desire for power.
According to CAIS, the risks of artificial intelligence becoming more independent cannot be ruled out: “By inventing more advanced machines, we are playing with fire. ”
CAIS experts conclude: “Reducing the risk of extinction due to AI should be a global priority along with risks such as pandemics and nuclear war. ”
We warned
The company ’ s arguments resonated in many areas.
Signatures under the statement put not only scientists and programmers, but also journalists and businessmen.
The most significant are the autographs of the “godfather ” of AI Jeffrey Hinton and OpenAI ’ s CEO Sam Altman.
Earlier, they had already talked about the dangers of AI.
“I ’ m pretty concerned about the possible existential risks that might arise when these things get smarter than us … I ’ ve come to the conclusion that [artificial] intelligence is different from ours.
It is as if one person learned something, and with him 10 thousand people learned the same thing.
That ’ s how these chatbots know more than anyone. ”
Moderate AI pessimists were also recorded by representatives of BigTech, Elon Musk, as well as Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak.
In their March open letter, they demanded that the development of better language models be suspended.
Should we automate all jobs?
Should we develop non-human brains that could later become smarter … and replace us? ”
According to experts, a pause in the development of AI will provide an opportunity to understand the ethical and social risks that the technology presents.
In turn, this should contribute to the development of safer systems.
However, some companies oppose such steps, as it can harm their immediate interests.
According to Forbes, the majority of surveyed owners are confident in the positive impact of AI on their business.
This applies to improving the quality of service (64%), increasing sales (60%), as well as improving the process of corporate decision-making (44%).
Especially can be outraged by companies that have reached new heights due to the association with AI.
For example, Nvidia broke through the $1 trillion market cap thanks to the AI boom.
The counter-argument of the proponents of a pause in the development of advanced AI is that it will cause only short-term losses.
In their opinion, in the long term, a break and additional research can make the use of technology safer and, thereby, more effectively reduce business costs.
However, these arguments do not convince everyone.
Opponents of the suspension of the development of AI argue that the “bad actors ”, despite all the agreements, will still continue to adapt the technology to their needs.
GeopolIItica
Hence the calls to create a system of its legal regulation of AI.
In the United States, for example, the first rudiments of such legislation appeared under Trump (2020), and in November 2022, the Biden administration published the plan of the Bill of Rights in the field of artificial intelligence.
Even more so, so far these are only sketches that have no force under them.
The situation is quite different in China.
By May 2023
Beijing has already been working on a second set of laws regulating AI.
For 6 years, since 2017, the PRC has been studying the legal aspects of the introduction of technology in most areas of life.
One of the goals of this activity is to increase public confidence in AI.
In addition, the presence of rules, according to Chinese experts, will allow entrepreneurs with greater confidence to use AI solutions in the activities of their companies.
A more global and longer-term goal could be to spread Chinese practices to other countries, giving Beijing an edge in technological competition with the United States.
On this account, there are many different considerations: some researchers are confident in the success of the Celestial Empire, another clarifies that the presence of a set of rules does not cancel the lag of China from the United States in some areas of AI (for example, large language models) - but all this only confirms the formation of artificial intelligence technologies as a subject of geopolitical struggle.
RESULTS
The potential risks of AI have been discussed for a long time.
For many years, they were treated superficially, as the beginning of the introduction of technology in everyday life seemed distant.
Nevertheless, the emergence of large language models, the gradual integration of AI solutions in the field of medicine, finance and even art forced experts to think.
Too fast the introduction of artificial intelligence, in their opinion, minimizes the chances of detecting problems in the work of the same language models.
And it seems that there will be more and more such voices.

**
  - Hinton is often called the "godfather" or "spiritual father" of AI because of his pioneering work in artificial neural networks, which are a key foundation of today’s AI systems, including technologies by Google, OpenAI, and others.

Title:

Content: RuNews.Biz
78 followers
Artificial intelligence can try to destroy humanity.
This was recognized by the “spiritual father ” of AI
Geoffrey Hinton, a British computer scientist, is known as the “spiritual father of artificial intelligence. ”
Back to article
Picture of the day
top

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

- His research enabled the development of deep learning, leading to advancements like large language models (e.g., ChatGPT).

Title:

Content: Microsoft and Google are actively investing in companies that create AI
recommendations
Microsoft and Google recently made major investments in two of the most valuable companies in the field of artificial intelligence (AI).
OpenAI, which developed ChatGPT, received a staggering $10 billion investment from Microsoft, while Google invested $300 million in Anthropic.
advertising
Financial support for AI companies has drawn public attention to the ongoing rivalry.
Google ’ s struggle for dominance with Microsoft is increasingly the subject of discussions about the future success of AI.
Google has made huge contributions to the field of artificial intelligence, including the invention of transformers — a special form of machine learning in which the algorithm improves on tasks as it “learns ” from data — the development of methods for automating language translation and the acquisition of DeepMind, a company engaged in artificial intelligence.
While Google has consistently positioned itself at the forefront of AI development, the introduction of ChatGPT has reached an important milestone.
OpenAI released ChatGPT in November 2022, and a more advanced version of GPT-4 was introduced in February 2023.
The advent of ChatGPT has sparked widespread debate about artificial general intelligence (AGI), in which machines outperform human intelligence.
This question was raised by Jeffrey Hinton, who is an influential figure in the field of artificial intelligence.
After leaving Google earlier this year, he gave several interviews in which he outlined his concerns about the technology.
Consequently, the number of research papers devoted to large language models (LLMs) — the type of artificial intelligence technology on which ChatGPT is based — has increased dramatically.
Other areas of AI research, such as conversational systems and information search, may lose out.
Against the backdrop of this rapid technological breakthrough, it seems that Google is afraid of losing its technological superiority and market dominance.
This concern is not unreasonable.
Created by a direct competitor, ChatGPT used Google ’ s pioneering internet search techniques to generate significant profits.
In addition, the flow of talent from Google to OpenAI — along with the rapid growth of the latter — has become an alarming trend for the search giant.
When OpenAI was founded, one of its principles was to create “open source ” software where the software is publicly available, allowing developers to share and modify it.
Meanwhile, Google is taking a relatively consistent commercial approach to its plans and ambitions.
However, OpenAI ’ s recent shift towards commercialization and closed source practices seems to contradict its original corporate philosophy.
Some industry insiders criticize OpenAI for its somewhat controversial stance.
Although the company positions itself as an open source AI developer, it is undoubtedly a commercial organization, and this fact it does not immediately recognize.
This contradiction between OpenAI ’ s public image and business realities has made the rivalry with Google even more intriguing.
One of the likely results of this competition is the further development and improvement of artificial intelligence technology caused by the need to stay ahead of the market.
Google ’ s methods, once used by OpenAI for commercial gain, are likely to be subject to further innovation.
This evolution will not only enhance the functionality of AI applications, but will also significantly improve the user experience.
Yusuf Mehdi, corporate vice president of Microsoft, recently pointed out that the company does not consider it necessary to rebuild the search engine, since even a single increase in market share means an increase in value of $2 billion.
This strategic reduction of their ambitions may be an attempt to reduce competitive pressure in the technology sector.
It ’ s worth noting that Microsoft ’ s collaboration with OpenAI adds another layer to this complex rivalry.
Google has also demonstrated its willingness to invest in external AI projects to expand its influence.
For example, the company ’ s investment in Anthropic, an artificial intelligence research company, reflects Google ’ s strategy to maintain its technological leadership through a strategic partnership.
One issue that resonates with many people is the potential for misinformation and distortion created by ChatGPT.
With more than 200 million users, it serves about 2.53% of the world ’ s population.
Widespread disinformation on social media has significantly eroded trust in online content and has reportedly influenced the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
With such an extensive user base of ChatGPT, it is possible that technology companies can manipulate opinions, silently influencing user preferences and decisions in a variety of ways.
Consequently, the need for more careful study and regulation of these large language patterns is becoming increasingly urgent.
Despite growing competition in the field of artificial intelligence, Google remains a respected organization in the global technology industry.
The artificial intelligence rivalry between Google and Microsoft has prompted both companies to push the boundaries of this technology, promising exciting advances in the coming years.
The various strategies used in this rivalry, from attracting talent to strategic investments, reflect the importance of artificial intelligence betting.
In particular, attracting the best specialists allows these companies to develop their capabilities in the field of artificial intelligence, which gives them a competitive advantage.
recommendations
Strategic investments, on the other hand, allow to diversify and master new AI applications and industries, increasing their influence and market share in the field of AI.
These actions highlight the high value and potential of AI technology in shaping our future.
For the post accrued remuneration
This material is written by a visitor to the site, and a reward is accrued for it.
+
Popular news

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

- **Why Did Hinton’s Resignation Make Headlines?

Title:

Content: RuNews.Biz
78 followers
Artificial intelligence can try to destroy humanity.
This was recognized by the “spiritual father ” of AI
Geoffrey Hinton, a British computer scientist, is known as the “spiritual father of artificial intelligence. ”
Back to article
Picture of the day
top

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

**
  - Hinton resigned from Google in 2023 to freely discuss the risks and dangers of advanced AI, which he fears may soon outpace human control.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

- This was significant because, as someone who contributed so much to AI’s rise, his warnings carry unusual weight and urgency.

Title:

Content: Stories
Google ’ s LaMDA AI Passed Turing Test – and Proved It Doesn ’ t Work
Stories
Elena Likhanova
Senior Editor RB.RU
Elena Likhanova
The Turing test has long been considered a benchmark for complex artificial intelligence models.
But even the author himself believed that the question of whether machines could actually think was “too pointless to merit discussion. ”
New York Times author Will Oremus analyzed why the main problem is not a potential uprising of machines, but the ability of algorithms to mislead people.
Here is a translation of his article.
Google ’ s LaMDA AI Passed Turing Test – and Proved It Doesn ’ t Work
AI-powered programs like Xiaoice, a human-like chatbot companion popular in China, can trick people into thinking they have their own minds and feelings.
In 1950, the scientist Alan Turing proposed a thought experiment, which he called imitation play.
The interviewer communicates with two subjects through messages typed on a typewriter.
He knows that one of them is a man and the other is a machine.
Make artificial intelligence self-learn and improve – choose online courses in the catalog of courses on machine learning.
If the machine could consistently trick the interviewer into believing it was a human being, Turing suggested, we could talk about it as capable of something like thinking.
Turing believed that the question of whether machines could actually think was "too pointless to merit discussion."
However, the Turing test became the benchmark for machine intelligence.
For decades, various computer programs have tried to pass it using primitive conversational tricks, and some have even succeeded.
In recent years, wealthy tech companies including Google, Facebook and OpenAI have developed a new class of computer programs known as “big language models. ”
Their ability to communicate far exceeded the rudimentary chatbots of the past.
One such model, Google ’ s LaMDA, convinced Google engineer Blake Lemoine that she was not only intelligent, but also capable of being aware and feeling.
If LaMDA ’ s realistic answers convinced even Lemoine, it ’ s easy to believe that it would work with many other people who are much less knowledgeable about AI.
This demonstrates how great the potential of the algorithm as a tool for deception and manipulation in the wrong hands.
Thus, for many experts in this field, LaMDA ’ s outstanding abilities in the Turing simulation game are not a significant achievement.
In any case, it shows that the authoritative test is no longer a benchmark for AI.
Google engineer discovered the consciousness of the neural network LaMDA
“These tests aren ’ t really about intelligence, ” said Gary Marcus, a cognitive scientist and co-author of Artificial Intelligence: Reboot.
What it reveals is the ability of the program to impersonate a person, at least under certain conditions.
Which, if you think about it, may not be so good for society.
“I don ’ t think it ’ s a movement towards intelligence.
It ’ s a move toward deceiving people into believing they have intelligence, ” Marcus said, referring to programs like LaMDA that create texts or conversations that resemble human ones.
Lemoine may stand out among his industry peers.
Both his Google colleagues and third-party AI experts say the program doesn ’ t and can ’ t have anything like the inner life it envisions.
We don ’ t have to worry that LaMDA will soon turn into Skynet, the evil machine mind of Terminator movies.
But now there is another cause for concern: we live in the world predicted by Turing, where some computer programs are so advanced that people may feel like they have their own will, even if in fact they are not.
Photo by Bas Nastassia / Shutterstock
Advanced AI programs, such as OpenAI ’ s GPT-3 text generator and DALL-E 2 image generator, are designed to create fantastically human-like creations.
To do this, huge amounts of data and huge computing power are used.
Such algorithms represent a much more powerful and complex approach to software development than was possible in the 1960s, when programmers gave ELIZA ’ s chatbot prefabricated responses to various verbal signals to trick human interlocutors.
And they can have commercial applications in everyday tools — search engines, autocomplete offers, and voice assistants like Apple ’ s Siri and Amazon ’ s Alexa.
It ’ s also worth noting that the AI sector has largely moved away from using the Turing Test as a benchmark.
Developers of large language models are now seeking high scores on tests such as GLUE (General Language Understanding Evaluation) and SQuAD (Stanford Question Answering Dataset).
And unlike ELIZA, LaMDA was not designed to impersonate a program.
She is just very good at collecting and giving truthful sounding answers to a variety of questions.
Nevertheless, despite all this complexity, the Turing test and modern models and tests have a common main goal - to get results that are as similar to human ones as possible.
This “arms race, ” as AI ethicist Margaret Mitchell called it in a Twitter conversation with Washington Post reporters on Wednesday, came at the expense of a variety of language model targets.
Among them is to make their work clear, and they do not mislead people or inadvertently reinforce harmful prejudices.
Mitchell and her former colleague Timnit Gebru were fired by Google in 2021 and 2020, respectively, after they co-authored an article on these and other risks of large language models.
While Google has distanced itself from Lemoine ’ s claims, IT professionals and other industry leaders have sometimes noted the ability of their systems to deceive people, said Jeremy Kahn, author of Fortune ’ s AI newsletter.
For example, at a public event in 2018, the company proudly reproduced Duplex ’ s voice assistant recordings, adding sounds like “m-m-m ” and“ hm-m-m ” that misled administrators into thinking a real person was calling to make an appointment.
After the backlash, Google promised that the system would identify itself as automated.
“The most disturbing legacy of the Turing test is ethical: the test is based on deception.
And here the impact of the test on the sphere was very real and disturbing, ” Kahn wrote.
Like other AI critics and commentators, Kahn called for abandoning the Turing test and moving on.
Of course, the industry has already done this in the sense that it has replaced the simulation game with more scientific benchmarks.
But the Lemoine story suggests that perhaps the Turing test could serve a different purpose in an era when machines are more and more able to sound human.
Instead of being a desirable standard, the Turing test should serve as an ethical red flag: any system capable of passing it carries the danger of deceiving people.
Source.
Cover photo: Zapp2Photo / Shutterstock
Subscribe to our Telegram channel to be aware of the latest news and events!
Did you find a typo?
Select text and press Ctrl + Enter
Materials on the topic
1.
Why Google ’ s parent company is investing billions of dollars in MedTech
2.
2 In the framework of the championship in AI and machine learning in Udmurtia will solve the problem for the space corporation
3.
Artificial intelligence or SMM specialist: how can business use technology in this area?
4.
4 AI Summit Machines Can See 2022 to be held in Moscow
5.
In Bashkortostan, the first regional championship of the contest “Digital Breakthrough.
Season: Artificial Intelligence »
FutureFood
Who produces “alternative ” food
Map

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

- **What Are Hinton’s Main Concerns About AI?

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Poses ethical risks
Becomes uncontrollable

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

**
  - **Job loss**: He predicts that millions could lose jobs due to automation, as is already happening in some fields.

Title:

Content: Today 10 June 2023
18 +
MWC 2018 2018 Computex IFA 2018
News Software
“If we slow down, the AI race will not stop ” – not all AI developers are ready to suspend development
Alex Carp, head of software company Palantir, says that only those who “don ’ t have AI products want to pause. ”
His company announced additional investments and rejected calls to suspend AI development.
“The race has started – the only question is, will we stay ahead or lose the lead? ” – asks the question with an edge Alex.
He is confident that the West currently has key commercial and military advantages in the field of AI and should not give them up.
Image source: Pixabay
“If we slow down, the AI race will not stop.
“No country in the world, especially our adversaries, can allow us to have this advantage, ” he said.
Karp ’ s comments have a very different tone compared to the recent glut of dire warnings about the potentially existential threat AI poses to humanity, and accompanying calls for slowing or even stopping its development.
In March, Elon Musk, Steve Wozniak, and more than 1,000 other AI experts and industry representatives called for a six-month moratorium on training AI systems that are more productive than OpenAI ’ s recently unveiled GPT-4.
In an open letter, they warned of potential risks to society.
In May, AI industry leaders, including executives from OpenAI and Google Deepmind, warned that artificial intelligence could lead to the extinction of humanity.
As one of the threats, they pointed out the involvement of AI in the development of a new generation of chemical weapons.
Two of the three so-called godfathers of AI — Geoffrey Hinton and Professor Yoshua Bengio — were among those who warned that the technology they helped create had enormous potential for harm.
Regulators in many countries are struggling to develop new rules to limit the risk of using AI.
This fall, the UK is planning a global summit on AI, and Prime Minister Rishi Sunak wants the UK to make efforts to ensure that the benefits of AI are “harnessed for the benefit of humanity. ”
The composition of the summit is not yet known, but the UK government said it would “bring together key countries, leading technology companies and researchers to agree on security measures to assess and monitor the most significant risks associated with AI. ”
Sunak argues that the UK is a “natural place ” to talk about AI, mentioning recent meetings with executives from leading AI firms.
According to him, this sector of the economy, which employs 50,000 people, brought the UK £3.7 billion.
Sunak ’ s desire to lead the process is understandable, but many question Britain ’ s leadership in this area.
Analysts believe that the UK may be too ambitious, and there are sharp differences in approaches to governance and regulation between the EU and the US, which the UK will be difficult to influence.
In addition, a number of global initiatives already exist, including the UN Global Digital Compact, which has a stronger fundamental foundation.
It should be noted that none of the most innovative firms in the field of artificial intelligence is based in the UK.
“Instead of trying to play this role, the UK may need to focus on encouraging responsible behavior in the research, development and deployment of these technologies, ” said Yasmin Afina, a research fellow at the Chatham House Digital Society Initiative.
The European Union is developing a law on artificial intelligence, but admits that even in the best case, it will take two and a half years to enter into force.
EU Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager said it would be “too late ”.
She reported on work on a voluntary code that could be drafted in a matter of weeks.
China is also actively developing rules for the use of AI, including a requirement to notify users whenever an AI algorithm is used.
Contradictions between AI developers and regulators will only multiply.
In the future, we can expect mass protests against the use of AI, because of which thousands of people are already losing their jobs, and in the future their number may be measured in millions.
Source:
If you notice an error - select it with the mouse and press CTRL + ENTER.
Materials on the topic
window-new
Soft
Hard
Trends 🔥

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

- **Misinformation & Deception**: AI’s ability to generate credible-sounding answers or content could mislead the public, create propaganda, or sway opinions—sometimes without people realizing it.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

- **Autonomy & Goal Formation**: Advanced AIs could develop unexpected sub-goals (such as gaining power) if misaligned with human interests, especially if misused by powerful actors.

Title:

Content: The creator of artificial intelligence regrets the development: it can use Putin
3 May 2023, 18: 42 updated 3 May, 19: 05
128
Geoffrey Hinton calls the “nightmare ” scenario if a Russian dictator or other“ bad actor ” uses artificial intelligence and robots for their own purposes.
Russian dictator Vladimir Putin may endow robots with artificial intelligence to gain more power.
This scenario is a nightmare.
This was stated by the developer of artificial intelligence Jeffrey Hinton, reports The New York Times.
The scientist regretted his development and warned of the danger.
He fears that "bad figures" could use the latest technology to win wars or manipulate the electorate.
"This is only the worst-case scenario - a nightmare scenario.
You can imagine that, for example, some bad actor like Putin decided to give robots the opportunity to create their own sub-goals like “I need to get more power, ” said Jeffrey Hilton.
video of the day
He added that learning artificial intelligence is different from human.
“They (digital systems – Glavred) can learn separately, but instantly share their knowledge.
So it ’ s as if you had 10,000 people, and every time one person learns something, everyone learns it automatically.
And that ’ s why these chatbots can know so much more than anyone, ” he added.
Earlier, the company Baykar Teknoloji showed a new model of the strike UAV Bayraktar – Baykar Kızılelma.
The drone is equipped with a jet engine and artificial intelligence.
The device can be used even from the deck of a light aircraft carrier.
Advisor to the Minister of Internal Affairs Rostislav Smirnov reported that Kiev hosted an international air defense system with artificial intelligence.
It determines the flight trajectories of objects and can be triggered ahead of time.
Other news:
Advertisement
Latest news
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
We use cookies
Accept

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Poses ethical risks
Becomes uncontrollable

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

- **Difficulty in Regulation**: Calls for regulation exist, but legal systems and codes are still in early stages and lag behind technology.

- **Global Competition**: There’s a race among nations and companies (notably in the US and China) to dominate AI; slowing down could mean losing an economic or military advantage.

- **How Have Other Experts and Companies Responded?

**
  - Some, like Palantir’s CEO, argue that pausing AI research is unrealistic due to global competition—and that only competitors with less-advanced products want to slow things down.

- Multiple prominent AI leaders (including OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman) have also signed warnings about risks to society from unchecked AI.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

- OpenAI (creators of ChatGPT) say their goal is AI for humanity’s benefit, developed safely, but their tools already show both positive and disruptive power.

Title:

Content: Go to main content
Advertisement
Live broadcast
Accidents
The fire occurred on the territory of the ski resort "Mountain air" on Sakhalin
Mir
Ukrainian media reported on new explosions in Kiev on the background of air alarm
Accidents
The plane flying to Sochi sat down in Chelyabinsk because of the health of the passenger
Mir
In Ukraine, proposed to sue Poland because of the protests of truckers
Mir
Sirens sounded in northern Israel
Mir
In the United States allowed the deprivation of Zelensky protection because of the refusal to negotiate
Mir
In Canada, pointed to the experiences of Zelensky because of the situation of Kiev
Mir
Floyd's killer was seriously stabbed in prison
Mir
In Ukraine reported explosions in the Kirovograd region
Army
Calculation MLRS "Tornado-G" struck a blow to the stronghold of the APU
Mir
In Ukraine reported explosions in Kiev
Mir
Damage from the riots in Dublin amounted to several million euros
Mir
Hamas holds 215 more hostages in Gaza
Army
Fighters of the group “East ” disrupted the advance of the infantry of the APU on the South Donetsk front
Staffing is allowed
Data Scientist Pavel Sukhachev on how the scandal with the dismissal of Sam Altman will affect OpenAI
0
Voice-over text
Highlight the main
INCLUDING
off
The dismissal of Sam Altman, the head of OpenAI, received as loud a resonance as the launch of ChatGPT itself.
It ’ s not the first time we ’ ve seen a shift in leadership, founders and inspirers, but this time the company ’ s team has expressed its clear position in an open letter demanding Altman ’ s return and confirmed its willingness to follow him to Microsoft.
I want to believe that this letter was one of the main reasons for the Board of Directors to reconsider its decision and return the founder to the post of CEO.
Easy to use ChatGPT allowed you to quickly write not only an essay, but also, if desired, program code for a user who does not have special skills.
But it ’ s like opening a Pandora ’ s box: the more opportunities you have, the more ways you can achieve your goals — and not always for the good.
In general, artificial intelligence (AI), like the OpenAI project, is designed to develop our society - bringing automation to a new level.
Generative AI appeared many years ago.
The progenitor is the founder of information theory Claude Shannon, who conducted the simplest experiments by current standards, but on their basis are now trained assistants such as ChatGPT and YandexGPT.
Shannon took a large text, such as William Shakespeare, and manually collected statistics: which letters next to each other are more common in different combinations.
And then, also manually, he started the process of generating text: all the letters were formed according to the statistics of the English language.
The bottom line is that when the letters are independent, you get a text where there are no real words.
And as we begin to take into account the joint occurrence of letters, the texts begin to become more and more similar to the real ones.
This is the approach used in large language models: they generate plausible sequences of symbols.
But it turned out that if you create a sufficiently large context, then something like a model of the world appears inside.
Learning, the neural network implicitly understands, for example, that light has four sides, but this does not mean that AI has thinking, consciousness.
Generative artificial intelligence simply notices complex dependencies in data.
The active development of AI began in 2017, when the architecture of neural networks such as “transformer ” showed very good results for working with a very long context – at the moment more than 100 thousand words.
Now in the world, the race of developers of generative AI is in full swing, and the global success of ChatGPT, the close attention of the public to the internal life of the company is a clear confirmation of this.
Of course, it has long been clear that artificial intelligence technologies will enter all areas of our lives and such a strong resource needs strict control.
OpenAI, in turn, was originally founded as a research company with a very global goal of developing AI for the benefit of humanity without causing harm.
Such grandiose in scale plans embodied very odious and well-known entrepreneurs in the field of technology - Elon Musk and Sam Altman, ready to attract active attention to world problems and look for opportunities to solve them.
They have repeatedly expressed the opinion that the intensive development of AI within large commercial companies in different countries can become dangerous for humanity, as it gives too much concentration of power in one hand.
ChatGPT is not just a text generator, just like Wikipedia is not just a free encyclopedia.
The more users a project collects, the stronger its impact, and the impact of AI technology itself is simply limitless and can become unmanageable without proper control.
In this regard, all modern generative models have a number of restrictions that are imposed by developers at two stages.
At the very beginning, when collecting a training sample, it is clearly filtered what data will fall into the model, there is a selection of information sources.
Then, restrictions are introduced at the generation stage: various filters are put into the network, which classify the object generated by the neural network and check whether there is no prohibited content there.
It is assumed that these restrictions will protect the neural network.
But this is not always possible – the models are quite unpredictable and can give out potential “wrong ” content, even despite the filters.
Humanism and ethics are embedded in the idea of   benefiting humanity, but these concepts themselves are ambiguous.
ChatGPT is based on a large dataset that reflected the features of the current Western agenda and, apparently, the views of the developers themselves.
In the process of collecting a large number of sample questions and answers, they ranked the data according to these views.
As a result, ChatGPT cannot be called objective and impartial.
For example, he is inclined to speak positively about the activities of the Democratic Party and criticize the Republican Party, and here one feels “parental upbringing ”.
The same rules were taken into account by the development team.
For example, in ChatGPT laid restrictive filters relating to the appearance of a person.
If you ask him to comment on a photo of a person with excess weight, then he will not give any advice about the nutrition system and sports, because he is forbidden to judge the appearance.
Filtering in ChatGPT and its development as an AI project, most likely, caused the personnel shocks that we see now in the company OpenAI.
The impact of OpenAI is comparable to that of Microsoft in IT in general.
We want to believe that the return of Sam Altman will keep unchanged the original goal of the company - the universal benefit of AI technologies.
However, such a successful project has outgrown itself that it cannot but bring a conflict of interest.
It is quite understandable and the desire to launch simply doomed to success commercial projects.
In any case, the strong support of the team, the public and, of course, Microsoft showed the importance of this very idea.
But, quite possibly, changes in the company ’ s strategy cannot be avoided, and what the service will become in the future, whether it will cease to be so accessible or vice versa, we will see in the near future.
Author: Director of Data Science at Nanosemantics, Engineer at the Laboratory of Neural Network Technologies and Computational Linguistics at MIPT
The position of the editorial board may not coincide with the opinion of the author
Live broadcast

- **Key Public Takeaways:**
  - AI is not only about smart tools—it already affects jobs, information, and even social stability.

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

- Key risks include mass unemployment, possibility of harmful misinformation, AI being used for manipulation or war, and the challenge of setting up effective regulation.

Title:

Content: 28 June 2023, 07: 34
Artificial intelligence called as dangerous as pandemics and nuclear war
The Week: the development of artificial intelligence will lead to the destruction of humanity
Read 360tv in
The development of artificial intelligence threatens humanity with extinction.
In terms of the danger to life on Earth, it was compared to pandemics and nuclear war, The Week reported.
British scientist Geoffrey Hinton, who was nicknamed the godfather of artificial intelligence, said that the mass upheaval and destruction of humanity due to the “uprising of machines ” has ceased to be science fiction.
In his opinion, the development of technology really poses a mortal danger to people.
And if earlier he predicted it in 30 years, now, with the current pace of development of neural networks, he has reduced this period to five years.
Advertisement
The same opinion was expressed by other experts.
More than 350 AI researchers and engineers have issued a warning that AI poses a danger comparable to the risks of pandemics and nuclear war.
While artificial intelligence is being trained and not so dangerous.
In the company "Geoscan" denied the information about the threat of an uprising of drones based on them.
Advertisement
Advertisement

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn "bad actors" could use AI for?

To win wars or manipulate the electorate.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

Misinformation
Job loss
Misuse in warfare

- The technology is developing rapidly, often outpacing social and legal controls.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Poses ethical risks
Becomes uncontrollable

- People need to understand that AI’s human-like communication can mislead—even experienced professionals.

Title:

Content: 28 June 2023, 07: 34
Artificial intelligence called as dangerous as pandemics and nuclear war
The Week: the development of artificial intelligence will lead to the destruction of humanity
Read 360tv in
The development of artificial intelligence threatens humanity with extinction.
In terms of the danger to life on Earth, it was compared to pandemics and nuclear war, The Week reported.
British scientist Geoffrey Hinton, who was nicknamed the godfather of artificial intelligence, said that the mass upheaval and destruction of humanity due to the “uprising of machines ” has ceased to be science fiction.
In his opinion, the development of technology really poses a mortal danger to people.
And if earlier he predicted it in 30 years, now, with the current pace of development of neural networks, he has reduced this period to five years.
Advertisement
The same opinion was expressed by other experts.
More than 350 AI researchers and engineers have issued a warning that AI poses a danger comparable to the risks of pandemics and nuclear war.
While artificial intelligence is being trained and not so dangerous.
In the company "Geoscan" denied the information about the threat of an uprising of drones based on them.
Advertisement
Advertisement

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

- Calls for action include both technical safeguards and meaningful legal oversight, but international agreement and enforcement remain difficult.

- **Overall Context:**
  - Hinton’s warnings sparked global debate because of his stature and the real-world impacts already visible from AI advancements.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

The public should stay engaged, understand the stakes, and push for transparent, inclusive policies around AI's deployment and oversight.

Here is a clear, digestible summary of the key points from the extracts, meant to help college students and the general public understand Geoffrey Hinton’s resignation, his concerns, and the broader significance for society:

**Who is Geoffrey Hinton?

Title:

Content: Global News
The world today - the "godfather" of artificial intelligence reveals why he left Google
You are now following the news of the "godfather" of artificial intelligence reveals the reason for his departure from "Google" from the Department of World News and now we leave you with the full details
MOHAMMED, Abu Dhabi, May 2, 2023 06: 22 AM - Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed "the father of artificial intelligence", revealed on Monday that he quit his job at Google last week, in order to speak publicly about the "dangers" of the technology he helped develop.
Hinton ’ s work on neural networks has shaped artificial intelligence systems that power many of today ’ s technology products.
Hinton, who worked part-time at Google for a decade, contributed to the tech giant ’ s AI development efforts, but has since had concerns about the technology and its role in its development.
In an interview with The New York Times, Hinton said, “I consolate myself with the common excuse: if I hadn ’ t done it, someone else would have done it. ”
Hinton attributed his decision to leave Google to his desire to speak freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, not to criticize the company, as he tweeted on Monday.
Google ’ s chief scientist, Jeff Dean, commented on Hinton ’ s decision: “He has made major breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, ” expressing appreciation for“ a decade of contributions to Google. ”
In a statement to CNN, Dean said: “We remain committed to a responsible approach to artificial intelligence.
We are constantly learning to understand emerging risks while boldly innovating. ”
Hinton ’ s decision to want to expose his concerns about artificial intelligence came as a growing number of lawmakers and groups raised warnings about the possibility of a new set of chatbots spreading fake information and eliminating a slew of jobs.
Hinton is not the first Google employee to alert to the dangers of artificial intelligence: in July, the company fired an engineer who claimed that an undisclosed intelligence system had become conscious, while many in the technical field strongly refused to confirm what the engineer said.
We hope that we have succeeded in conveying the full details of the news of the "spiritual father" of artificial intelligence reveals the reason for his departure from Google..
In God ’ s care and protection.
You may also read.

**
- Geoffrey Hinton is a renowned computer scientist known as one of the "godfathers" or pioneers of artificial intelligence (AI).

- His work, especially on neural networks, laid the foundation for many of today’s AI technologies, including systems like ChatGPT.

Title:

Content: Global News
The world today - the "godfather" of artificial intelligence reveals why he left Google
You are now following the news of the "godfather" of artificial intelligence reveals the reason for his departure from "Google" from the Department of World News and now we leave you with the full details
MOHAMMED, Abu Dhabi, May 2, 2023 06: 22 AM - Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed "the father of artificial intelligence", revealed on Monday that he quit his job at Google last week, in order to speak publicly about the "dangers" of the technology he helped develop.
Hinton ’ s work on neural networks has shaped artificial intelligence systems that power many of today ’ s technology products.
Hinton, who worked part-time at Google for a decade, contributed to the tech giant ’ s AI development efforts, but has since had concerns about the technology and its role in its development.
In an interview with The New York Times, Hinton said, “I consolate myself with the common excuse: if I hadn ’ t done it, someone else would have done it. ”
Hinton attributed his decision to leave Google to his desire to speak freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, not to criticize the company, as he tweeted on Monday.
Google ’ s chief scientist, Jeff Dean, commented on Hinton ’ s decision: “He has made major breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, ” expressing appreciation for“ a decade of contributions to Google. ”
In a statement to CNN, Dean said: “We remain committed to a responsible approach to artificial intelligence.
We are constantly learning to understand emerging risks while boldly innovating. ”
Hinton ’ s decision to want to expose his concerns about artificial intelligence came as a growing number of lawmakers and groups raised warnings about the possibility of a new set of chatbots spreading fake information and eliminating a slew of jobs.
Hinton is not the first Google employee to alert to the dangers of artificial intelligence: in July, the company fired an engineer who claimed that an undisclosed intelligence system had become conscious, while many in the technical field strongly refused to confirm what the engineer said.
We hope that we have succeeded in conveying the full details of the news of the "spiritual father" of artificial intelligence reveals the reason for his departure from Google..
In God ’ s care and protection.
You may also read.

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

- Hinton worked at Google for a decade, helping develop cutting-edge AI systems.

Title:

Content: Global News
The world today - the "godfather" of artificial intelligence reveals why he left Google
You are now following the news of the "godfather" of artificial intelligence reveals the reason for his departure from "Google" from the Department of World News and now we leave you with the full details
MOHAMMED, Abu Dhabi, May 2, 2023 06: 22 AM - Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed "the father of artificial intelligence", revealed on Monday that he quit his job at Google last week, in order to speak publicly about the "dangers" of the technology he helped develop.
Hinton ’ s work on neural networks has shaped artificial intelligence systems that power many of today ’ s technology products.
Hinton, who worked part-time at Google for a decade, contributed to the tech giant ’ s AI development efforts, but has since had concerns about the technology and its role in its development.
In an interview with The New York Times, Hinton said, “I consolate myself with the common excuse: if I hadn ’ t done it, someone else would have done it. ”
Hinton attributed his decision to leave Google to his desire to speak freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, not to criticize the company, as he tweeted on Monday.
Google ’ s chief scientist, Jeff Dean, commented on Hinton ’ s decision: “He has made major breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, ” expressing appreciation for“ a decade of contributions to Google. ”
In a statement to CNN, Dean said: “We remain committed to a responsible approach to artificial intelligence.
We are constantly learning to understand emerging risks while boldly innovating. ”
Hinton ’ s decision to want to expose his concerns about artificial intelligence came as a growing number of lawmakers and groups raised warnings about the possibility of a new set of chatbots spreading fake information and eliminating a slew of jobs.
Hinton is not the first Google employee to alert to the dangers of artificial intelligence: in July, the company fired an engineer who claimed that an undisclosed intelligence system had become conscious, while many in the technical field strongly refused to confirm what the engineer said.
We hope that we have succeeded in conveying the full details of the news of the "spiritual father" of artificial intelligence reveals the reason for his departure from Google..
In God ’ s care and protection.
You may also read.

**Why Did He Resign, and What Are His Warnings?

Title:

Content: Artificial intelligence: Geoffrey Hinton 'godfather' of modern technology resigns from Google and warns of its danger
Jeffrey Hinton, widely regarded as the spiritual father of artificial intelligence, has resigned, warning of the growing dangers of AI development.
Hinton, 75, announced his resignation from Google in a statement to the New York Times, saying he now regrets his work.
He told the BBC that some of the dangers of smart chatbots were "very scary".
“Right now, they ’ re not as smart as we can tell.
But I think they ’ ll be soon. ”
Hinton ’ s groundbreaking research on deep learning and neural networks has paved the way for artificial intelligence systems such as ChatGT.
But British-Canadian cognitive psychologist and computer science specialist Hinton told the BBC the chatbot could soon surpass the level of information held by the human brain.
Skip the podcast and keep reading.
Podcast
BBC Extra
A weekly podcast that presents humanitarian stories about the Arab world and its youth.
Loops
Podcast End
“Right now, what we ’ re seeing is that things like GPT-4 are far superior to a person in the amount of general knowledge they have.
For thinking, it ’ s not good, but it really works on simple thinking. ”
"Given the rate of development, we expect things to improve quickly.
So we have to worry about that. ”
In the article he sent to the New York Times, he pointed out that “bad actors ” may try to use artificial intelligence to do“ bad things. ”
In response to the BBC's request for further clarification on the matter, he said: "This is just kind of a worst-case scenario, kind of a nightmare scenario."
“Can you imagine, for example, that someone as bad as the Russian president (Vladimir Putin) decided to give robots the ability to create their own sub-goals? ”
In the end, he warned, this could “create sub-goals – for example, ‘ I need to get more power. ’ ”
"I have come to the conclusion that the kind of intelligence we develop is very different from the intelligence we have," he said.
“We are biological systems and these are digital systems.
The big difference is that with digital systems you have many copies of the same weight set, of the same world model. ”
"All of these versions can learn separately, but they share their knowledge immediately.
If you have 10,000 people, when one person learns something, everyone will automatically know it.
So chatbots can know much more than one person. ”
Hinton also spoke of several other reasons why he quit his job.
“One of them is that I am 75 years old now.
And the other is that I want to say good things about Google.
It would be more credible if I didn ’ t work for Google. ”
He stressed that he did not want to criticize Google, and that the company was "very responsible".
Google Chief Scientist Jeff Dean said: “We remain committed to a responsible approach to artificial intelligence.
We are constantly learning to understand the risks arising under innovation boldly as well. ”

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

**
- Hinton resigned from Google in 2023 mainly so he could speak freely about the risks of advanced AI, not to criticize the company.

Title:

Content: Global News
The world today - the "godfather" of artificial intelligence reveals why he left Google
You are now following the news of the "godfather" of artificial intelligence reveals the reason for his departure from "Google" from the Department of World News and now we leave you with the full details
MOHAMMED, Abu Dhabi, May 2, 2023 06: 22 AM - Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed "the father of artificial intelligence", revealed on Monday that he quit his job at Google last week, in order to speak publicly about the "dangers" of the technology he helped develop.
Hinton ’ s work on neural networks has shaped artificial intelligence systems that power many of today ’ s technology products.
Hinton, who worked part-time at Google for a decade, contributed to the tech giant ’ s AI development efforts, but has since had concerns about the technology and its role in its development.
In an interview with The New York Times, Hinton said, “I consolate myself with the common excuse: if I hadn ’ t done it, someone else would have done it. ”
Hinton attributed his decision to leave Google to his desire to speak freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, not to criticize the company, as he tweeted on Monday.
Google ’ s chief scientist, Jeff Dean, commented on Hinton ’ s decision: “He has made major breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, ” expressing appreciation for“ a decade of contributions to Google. ”
In a statement to CNN, Dean said: “We remain committed to a responsible approach to artificial intelligence.
We are constantly learning to understand emerging risks while boldly innovating. ”
Hinton ’ s decision to want to expose his concerns about artificial intelligence came as a growing number of lawmakers and groups raised warnings about the possibility of a new set of chatbots spreading fake information and eliminating a slew of jobs.
Hinton is not the first Google employee to alert to the dangers of artificial intelligence: in July, the company fired an engineer who claimed that an undisclosed intelligence system had become conscious, while many in the technical field strongly refused to confirm what the engineer said.
We hope that we have succeeded in conveying the full details of the news of the "spiritual father" of artificial intelligence reveals the reason for his departure from Google..
In God ’ s care and protection.
You may also read.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

- He worries that AI development is now outpacing responsible oversight.

Title:

Content: Artificial intelligence.
An actual revolution or an exaggeration for the sake of promotion?
In the past eight months, the debate has escalated over concerns related to the development of artificial intelligence amid unrivalled global interest in the artificial intelligence technology known as “Chat GBT ”.
Add Announcement
As tech companies compete to develop and deploy AI tools similar to Chat BT, many people have expressed concerns about the possibility of new challenges at different levels that could face humanity as a whole.
On the other hand, another team supports this industry as an important source of many benefits in all economic sectors, but they themselves warned of the risks that can accompany its development, especially generative artificial intelligence, which requires the organization of this industry before humans fall victim to the decline in negative trends.
The growing controversy over this phenomenon has taken a serious turn to the extent that a question has been raised on the surface.
Will the development of artificial intelligence at this pace be in the interest of humanity or will it be a reason to drag it into the abyss?
Amid this disagreement, there are those who believe that the matter has been greatly exaggerated for the purpose of promoting the products of companies in the artificial intelligence sector, because everything that happens to date revolves in the orbit of limited artificial intelligence, which does not exceed the receipt of instructions by humans and re-put to humans, including Alexa, Siri and Chat GB.
Among the experts, the concerns associated with artificial intelligence include the possibility of job losses due to automation, fears of its progress beyond human intelligence, and others related to the dissemination of misleading information as generative AI can provide society with fake news if fed with fake data.
The experts pointed to legitimate concerns about the possibility of the impact of generative artificial intelligence negatively on intellectual property, especially in the creative industries, and negatively affect the processes of education and human ability to innovate, and fears of the development of the capabilities of artificial intelligence technologies to be able to take decisions away from the human element or control by parties seeking to use them for illegal purposes.
Two months ago, chat gbt creator Sam Altman called on US lawmakers to regulate artificial intelligence and create a new licensing body for AI companies.
Altman ’ s call was based on his recognition of the impact AI can have on the economy, which includes the potential for AI to replace some jobs, and its potential dangers in spreading misinformation and other negative trends.
Strategic Technical Consultant M. Hani Mahmoud Al-Batsh stressed that the field of artificial intelligence is a rapidly evolving field and has the potential to revolutionize many aspects of our lives.
However, Batsh stressed that one of the biggest concerns associated with artificial intelligence is the possibility of job losses due to automation.
Al-Batsh said: “Artificial intelligence and its development increases its ability to replace humans in many industries, which contributes to increasing unemployment rates. ”
“AI algorithms can also be biased and discriminatory, resulting in unequal treatment of certain groups of individuals, such as people of different races or genders. ”
Other challenges and concerns associated with artificial intelligence, according to Al-Batsh, are those related to personal data, noting that most artificial intelligence systems rely on large amounts of data, which can include sensitive personal information that may fall into the hands of entities that may use it for illegal purposes.
"There are concerns that artificial intelligence could be used to develop weapons that could be used to target and kill people," he said.
Al-Batsh stressed that artificial intelligence systems are relatively complex, which makes it difficult to determine how they make decisions, so there are fears that artificial intelligence will one day become so advanced that it exceeds human intelligence and becomes impossible to control, pointing out that this may lead to a number of unexpected and sometimes disastrous results.
Governments are concerned about the security risks posed by the AI industry, as it has become more advanced, it may use the industry to launch cyber attacks or other types of attacks that may be difficult to detect and defend.
A few months ago, the G7 countries agreed to adopt regulations for these technologies in light of privacy concerns and security risks, to ensure transparency and counter misinformation.
But the G7 countries agreed that the regulations should also "maintain an open and encouraging environment" for the development of artificial intelligence technologies and be based on democratic values.
Wasfi Safadi, an expert in the field of communications and technology, believes that there are fears of artificial intelligence as a result of the development of its technologies to become self-evolving largely dependent on the amount of information it can access, analyze and use in several fields and different industries.
Safadi stressed that the fears of artificial intelligence come because today we can not imagine where artificial intelligence can reach?
Will it be for the good of mankind or will it be the cause of the annihilation of mankind?
He pointed out that a number of countries have sounded the alarm, for example, Italy issued a decision to ban the application of such as "Chat GB", for violating the privacy of minors by collecting data on them, calling for the existence of international legislation on the ethics of artificial intelligence to reduce the damage that can violate human rights and humanity, especially with regard to the bad use of humanity and humanity.
He pointed to the open letter signed by dozens of people working in the field of artificial intelligence last March, including billionaire Elon Musk, and called for a temporary halt to all efforts to develop more advanced versions of the current version of the chat robot ChatGB, until strict security measures are reached and implemented.
Safadi said: “With our reliance on technology and the Internet to a great extent today, and with this superior knowledge and ability to control industries by artificial intelligence technologies, we are facing a machine capable of, for example, manufacturing deadly biological and chemical weapons, developing DNA sequences, violating privacy, especially with deep counterfeiting able to create your identity and use it in many ways. seconds".
One of the most prominent figures who stressed the potential dangers of artificial intelligence systems, Jeffrey Hinton, a pioneer in the world of artificial intelligence, or as they like to call him "the father of artificial intelligence", said this year that despite the great benefits of artificial intelligence systems in all fields, including military and economic, he is concerned that these systems set themselves sub-goals that are not in line with the interests of their programmers.
Hinton, who has quit his job at Google, expressed concern about the catastrophic misuse of artificial intelligence systems by “malicious ” actors, he said,“ they may exploit artificial intelligence for bad purposes, ” and expressed concern about the negative effects on jobs in the labor market.
Dr. Jafar Al-Sarayreh, Director of the Consultancy and Training Center at Princess Sumaya University for Technology, stressed that a regulatory framework and procedures for the use of artificial intelligence must be developed, including a number of policies and laws governing the use of such technologies locally and globally, pointing out the importance of the participation of stakeholders in the development of this regulatory framework, including government, companies, academic institutions, civil society and experts in the field of artificial intelligence.
He pointed out that at the global level, there are initiatives and institutions working to develop regulatory frameworks for artificial intelligence, including the United Nations is developing global guidelines for artificial intelligence focusing on ethics, human rights, transparency and responsibility.
The Minister of Digital Economy and Entrepreneurship, Ahmed Al-Hananda, recently told Al-Ghad that "the government is following with interest the developments in the field of artificial intelligence, and is constantly working to empower society, the private sector and government institutions to benefit from all technical developments, including artificial intelligence, within the framework of the digital transformation process on which it is based.
He stressed that the government has been preparing for years to benefit from the developments of artificial intelligence by approving the Jordanian Artificial Intelligence Policy, the National Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence, the Jordanian Strategy for Artificial Intelligence and the Executive Plan (2023-2027), the project to measure the readiness of public sector institutions to adopt artificial intelligence, and technical cooperation with the Japan International Cooperation Agency.
Technical expert Hossam Khattab, described the technology of artificial intelligence as: "take away the hearts", and what one may notice at the moment that the term "has become marketing", and that all we see and hear about today is only devices that carry out automated tasks.
He pointed out that companies are racing to describe their products as relying on artificial intelligence, because it is a common technology and no one wants to be left behind.
For example, ChatGPT, which says, “still doesn ’ t work on AI in the big sense, ” in its case the machine doesn ’ t think, it receives commands, and decides on the optimal set of words to answer based on a large database it has been trained on.
Among Khattab, the types of artificial intelligence, the first of which is limited artificial intelligence Narrow AI: applications smart assistants such as Alexa, Siri and ChatGPT, applications that are programmed to carry out specific tasks, and do not have intelligence.
“The second type is general artificial intelligence: a machine understands and performs multiple tasks based on accumulated experience, which is similar to human intelligence.
The machine is conscious, analyzing and thinking, and it is unrealized in today ’ s products. ”
“The third type is super AI: in which the machine exceeds human intelligence in all areas and tasks, and the machine is able to learn and develop itself, which is a theoretical concept until this moment, ” Khattab said.
“We still have not dealt with machines that think independently of human intervention, self-develop, learn and excel at their programmer, and all the commercial applications available now revolve around the orbit of limited artificial intelligence, it is necessary to understand this fact, which is overlooked or overlooked by companies and people intentionally or unintentionally. ”
He pointed out: "The limited artificial intelligence is similar to the tasks that we previously carried out, but it has become faster automatically, and most of what we hear about falls under this category.
Either the machine thinks like humans, or they are smarter than humans, the concept does not yet have commercial applications, a reality that companies may have overlooked. ”
The General Manager of Pure Analysis for Management and Technology Consultancy, Dr. Moataz Mohammed Al-Dabai, said: “It is important to carefully consider the potential disadvantages of artificial intelligence and take steps to mitigate them and work to control its negative impact on humanity. ”
He called for a balance between the suitability of artificial intelligence and the need to maintain our cognitive abilities and self-sufficiency.
He pointed out that the main concerns in this area relate to the excessive reliance on artificial intelligence in the performance of life and professional work, which is likely to lead to the loss of our basic skills and lack of confidence in our human capabilities.
He pointed out that this could develop to the extent that it could lead to the loss of the ability to innovate and creative thinking and the inability of humanity to respond to special and unexpected circumstances.
He cited, for example, the increasingly widespread use of voice assistants, on which people may rely heavily for basic tasks such as reminding of appointments and tasks to be accomplished, such as making phone calls or ordering goods and services.
“This over-reliance on artificial intelligence could lead to a decline in communication and social skills, ” he said.
AI can be used to create personalized, highly targeted and personalized ads or content that can have a negative impact on mental health by promoting negative biases, stereotypes or insecurity.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Poses ethical risks
Becomes uncontrollable

- Major concerns include:
  - **Job Losses:** Automation powered by AI could lead to significant job losses, further worsening inequality—the economic gains might flow to the wealthy, not workers.

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

- **Fake News and Misinformation:** AI tools can generate convincing fake content, making it harder to distinguish true from false information, which could destabilize society.

Title:

Content: Information Technology
The father of artificial intelligence urges governments to face its risks before disaster
Jeffrey Hinton, described as the father of artificial intelligence, on Wednesday urged governments to intervene to ensure that machines do not control society.
Hinton made headlines in May when he announced his resignation from Google to speak more freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, shortly after the launch of ChatGPT, which captivated the world.
The artificial intelligence scientist, who is studying at the University of Toronto, spoke to a crowd at the Collagen Technology Conference in the Canadian city.
The conference attracted more than 30,000 startup founders, investors and tech workers, most of whom were eager to learn how to ride the wave of artificial intelligence rather than hear lessons about its risks or calls for governments to intervene.
“Before AI becomes smarter than us, I think the people who develop it should be encouraged to put a lot of effort into understanding how it can try to take control of us, ” Hinton said.
“Now there are 99 highly intelligent people trying to make AI better, and one very intelligent person trying to figure out how to stop it from taking control, and maybe we should be more balanced. ”
Hinton warned that the dangers of artificial intelligence must be taken seriously.
“I think it ’ s important for people to understand that this is not science fiction or just fear, ” he said, adding:“ It ’ s a real risk that we have to think about, and we have to figure out how to deal with it first. ”
Hinton expressed concern that AI would deepen inequality, as the vast gains from its productivity would go to the rich, not the workers.
“Wealth will not go to the people who work, it will make the rich richer, not the poor, and this is a very bad society, ” he said.
He also pointed to the danger of “fake news ” that can be created by robots such as ChatGPT, hoping to mark the content generated by artificial intelligence programs as central banks mark coins.
He stressed that it is important to “try, for example, to distinguish everything that is fake as fake, ” and said,“ I don ’ t know if we can do it technically or not. ”
“The Island Net ”

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

- **Potential Loss of Human Control:** Advanced AI might eventually “take control” or surpass human intelligence in important domains.

Title:

Content: Is AI really a threat to humanity?
That's what the father of artificial intelligence said about his risks.
Miscellaneous
Publish
Jeffrey Hinton, who is known as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” talked about whether this intelligence is really starting to threaten humanity.
Hinton had quit his job at Google, so he could freely discuss the dangers of artificial intelligence.
“A few months ago, I was always worried about things like what would happen to people who lost their jobs to artificial intelligence, battle robots, fake news to be published, echo chambers being produced by getting people to click on things that made them angry, ” Hinton said.
“It ’ s worrying because we don ’ t know any examples of smarter things being controlled by less intelligent things, in human societies you often have dictators who aren ’ t as smart as some of the other classes, but that ’ s not a big difference, they ’ re in the same field, but here these things are going to become much smarter than us. ”
“The concern is can we keep it working for us when it ’ s smarter than us?
For example, she will learn to deceive and will be able to deceive us if she wants to. ”

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

The risk is not just science fiction—bad actors or governments could use AI for harmful purposes or even cyberattacks.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

- **Technical and Social Risks:** Hinton questions whether society can really keep up, for example in marking fake AI content, due to the technical challenges involved.

Title:

Content: Is AI really a threat to humanity?
That's what the father of artificial intelligence said about his risks.
Miscellaneous
Publish
Jeffrey Hinton, who is known as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” talked about whether this intelligence is really starting to threaten humanity.
Hinton had quit his job at Google, so he could freely discuss the dangers of artificial intelligence.
“A few months ago, I was always worried about things like what would happen to people who lost their jobs to artificial intelligence, battle robots, fake news to be published, echo chambers being produced by getting people to click on things that made them angry, ” Hinton said.
“It ’ s worrying because we don ’ t know any examples of smarter things being controlled by less intelligent things, in human societies you often have dictators who aren ’ t as smart as some of the other classes, but that ’ s not a big difference, they ’ re in the same field, but here these things are going to become much smarter than us. ”
“The concern is can we keep it working for us when it ’ s smarter than us?
For example, she will learn to deceive and will be able to deceive us if she wants to. ”

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

**Other Experts' Responses**
- The tech industry is mostly pushing forward, trying to "ride the AI wave," often focusing on opportunities instead of risks.

Title:

Content: The father of artificial intelligence warns: he will control us and governments to confront him
2023-06-29T07: 41: 01.000000Z
Jeffrey Hinton, described as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” on Thursday called on governments to confront the dangers of this type of intelligence and intervene to ensure that machines do not control society.
The warnings come at a time when "artificial intelligence" is rapidly evolving, which has raised concerns about its impact on many human jobs.
Hinton made headlines in May 2023 when he announced his resignation from Google to speak more freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, shortly after the launch of the chatbot that captivated the world.
The artificial intelligence scientist, who teaches at the University of Toronto, spoke to a crowd at the Collegion Technology Conference in the Canadian city, according to Agence France-Presse.
The conference attracted more than 30,000 startup founders, investors and tech professionals, most of whom were looking to learn how to ride the wave of AI rather than hear lessons about its risks or calls for governments to intervene.
Hinton said that “before AI becomes smarter than us, I think the people who develop it should be encouraged to do a lot of work to understand how it can try to take control of us. ”
“Now there are 99 highly intelligent people trying to make AI better, and one very intelligent person trying to figure out how to stop it from taking control, and maybe you should be more balanced. ”
Hinton warned that the dangers of “artificial intelligence ” must be taken seriously, saying:“ I think it ’ s important for people to realize that this is not science fiction or just fear, ” stressing that “it ’ s a real risk that we have to think about, and we have to figure out how to deal with it beforehand. ”
Hinton also expressed concern that AI would deepen inequality, where the vast gains from its productivity would go to the rich, not the workers, and said that “wealth will not go to the people who work, it will make the rich richer, not the poor, and this is a very bad society. ”
He also pointed to the danger of "fake news" that can be created by robots such as ChatGPT, expressing the hope that content generated by "artificial intelligence" programs will be marked, and that central banks will mark monetary currencies.
Hinton also stressed that “it is very important to try, for example, to identify everything that is fake as fake, I don ’ t know if we can do that technically or not. ”
This comes as big tech companies such as Microsoft, Google and others are racing to make advances in artificial intelligence, which some experts warn could replace some human jobs, while others say AI will help generate other jobs for humans.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres earlier announced his support for the creation of a UN agency specialized in artificial intelligence "inspired by the International Atomic Energy Agency", noting that only member states are the decision-makers.
Shafaq Live
Shafaq Live

- Other AI experts and leaders have echoed Hinton’s concerns, calling for careful regulation, government intervention, and emergency safeguards.

Title:

Content: Report highlights the seriousness of artificial intelligence and warns of the threat of human extinction with a call for America to intervene
The world.
Publish
9 minutes read
(CNN) -- A new report commissioned by the State Department paints a worrying picture of the "catastrophic" national security risks posed by rapidly evolving artificial intelligence and warns the federal government is running out of time to avert disaster.
The findings were based on interviews with more than 200 people over more than a year, including senior executives from leading AI companies, cybersecurity researchers, weapons of mass destruction experts, and national security officials within the government.
The report, released this week by AI Gladstone, categorically suggests that more advanced AI systems could, in the worst case scenario, “pose an extinction-level threat to the human race. ”
The US State Department did not respond to a request for comment.
The warning in the report is another reminder that while the potential of AI continues to captivate investors and the public, there are real risks as well.
Jeremy Harris, CEO and co-founder of Gladstone AI, told CNN on Tuesday: “Artificial intelligence is already an economically transformative technology.
It can allow us to cure diseases, make scientific discoveries, and overcome challenges we once thought insurmountable. ”
"But it could also bring serious risks, including catastrophic risks, that we should be aware of."
“A growing body of evidence – including empirical research and analysis published at the world ’ s most important AI conferences – suggests that above a certain threshold of capability, AI systems are likely to become out of control. ”
White House spokeswoman Robin Patterson said President Joe Biden ’ s executive order on AI was “the most significant action any government in the world has taken to deliver on the promise and manage AI risk. ”
“The President and Vice President will continue to work with our international partners and urge Congress to pass bipartisan legislation to manage the risks associated with these emerging technologies, ” Paterson said.
A clear and urgent need to intervene
Researchers warn of two major dangers posed by large-scale artificial intelligence.
First, Gladstone AI said the most advanced AI systems could be armed to cause irreparable damage.
Second, there are particular concerns within AI labs that they may at some point “lose control ” over the very systems they are developing, with“ potentially devastating consequences for global security. ”
"The rise of artificial intelligence and artificial general intelligence has the potential to destabilize global security in ways reminiscent of the introduction of nuclear weapons," the report said, adding that there is a risk of an AI "arms race", conflict and "deadly accidents the size of weapons of mass destruction."
The Gladstone AI report calls for radical new steps aimed at countering this threat, including the launch of a new AI agency, the imposition of “emergency ” regulatory safeguards and restrictions on how much computer power can be used to train AI models.
The authors wrote in the report: "There is a clear and urgent need for the intervention of the United States government."
The report notes that although the work was produced for the State Department, its views “do not reflect the views ” of the agency or the U.S. government in general.
A government notice issued in 2022 by the State Department ’ s Nonproliferation and Disarmament Fund Office shows that the government is offering to pay up to $250,000 for an assessment of “proliferation and security risks ” associated with advanced AI.
Safety Concerns
Harris, Gladstone ’ s executive director of artificial intelligence, said his team ’ s “unprecedented level of access ” to public and private officials had led to startling conclusions.
Gladstone AI said it spoke to technical and leadership teams from chat owner OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Facebook parent company Meta and Anthropic.
In a video posted on Gladstone AI ’ s website announcing the report, Harris said: “Along the way, we ’ ve learned some disturbing things.
Behind the scenes, the safety and security situation in advanced AI seems largely inadequate compared to the national security risks that AI may soon pose somewhat. ”
The Gladstone AI report said competitive pressures were driving companies to accelerate AI development “at the expense of safety and security, ” increasing the likelihood that more advanced AI systems would be“ stolen ” and “weaponized ” against the United States.
The findings add to a growing list of warnings about the existential risks posed by AI — including from even some of the industry ’ s most powerful figures.
Nearly a year ago, Jeffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” quit his job at Google and sounded the alarm about the technology he helped develop.
Hinton said there is a 10% chance that artificial intelligence will lead to human extinction within the next three decades.
Hinton and dozens of AI industry leaders, academics and others signed a statement in June saying that “mitigating the extinction risk of AI must be a global priority. ”
Business leaders are increasingly concerned about these risks – even as they invest billions of dollars in AI.
Last year, 42% of CEOs surveyed at last year ’ s Yale CEO Summit said AI has the potential to destroy humanity five to ten years from now.
abilities similar to human abilities to learn.
Gladstone AI in its report pointed to some prominent individuals who have warned about the existential risks posed by artificial intelligence, including Elon Musk, Federal Trade Commission Chairman Lena Khan, and a former senior executive at OpenAI.
Some employees at AI companies share similar concerns privately, according to Gladstone AI.
“An individual at one of the well-known AI labs expressed the view that if a specific next-generation model of AI were launched without access restrictions, it would be ‘ very bad ’, because the model ’ s potentially convincing ability could ‘ break democracy ’ if leveraged in areas such as election interference or voter manipulation, ” the report said.
Gladstone said she had asked AI experts in some labs to share their personal estimates privately about the likelihood that an AI incident could lead to “irreversible global effects ” in 2024.
Estimates ranged from 4 percent to as much as 20 percent, according to the report, which notes that the estimates were informal and likely to be heavily biased.
One of the biggest surprises is how quickly artificial intelligence is evolving — specifically artificial general intelligence (AGI), a hypothetical form of artificial intelligence that has a human-like or even superhuman learning ability.
The report says AI is seen as “the main driver of catastrophic risks caused by loss of control, ” and notes that OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Anthropic, and Nvidia have all publicly stated access to AI by 2028 — though others believe it ’ s far beyond.
Gladstone AI points out that disagreements over AI timelines make it difficult to develop policies and safeguards, and there is a risk of a slowdown in regulation as technology evolves.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

- There’s growing debate: Will AI help humanity, or create new dangers—from loss of jobs and increased inequality to security threats and, in the most extreme scenarios, even risk to human existence?

Title:

Content: Is AI really a threat to humanity?
That's what the father of artificial intelligence said about his risks.
Miscellaneous
Publish
Jeffrey Hinton, who is known as the “godfather of artificial intelligence, ” talked about whether this intelligence is really starting to threaten humanity.
Hinton had quit his job at Google, so he could freely discuss the dangers of artificial intelligence.
“A few months ago, I was always worried about things like what would happen to people who lost their jobs to artificial intelligence, battle robots, fake news to be published, echo chambers being produced by getting people to click on things that made them angry, ” Hinton said.
“It ’ s worrying because we don ’ t know any examples of smarter things being controlled by less intelligent things, in human societies you often have dictators who aren ’ t as smart as some of the other classes, but that ’ s not a big difference, they ’ re in the same field, but here these things are going to become much smarter than us. ”
“The concern is can we keep it working for us when it ’ s smarter than us?
For example, she will learn to deceive and will be able to deceive us if she wants to. ”

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

**What Should the Public Understand?

Title:

Content: Information Technology
The father of artificial intelligence urges governments to face its risks before disaster
Jeffrey Hinton, described as the father of artificial intelligence, on Wednesday urged governments to intervene to ensure that machines do not control society.
Hinton made headlines in May when he announced his resignation from Google to speak more freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, shortly after the launch of ChatGPT, which captivated the world.
The artificial intelligence scientist, who is studying at the University of Toronto, spoke to a crowd at the Collagen Technology Conference in the Canadian city.
The conference attracted more than 30,000 startup founders, investors and tech workers, most of whom were eager to learn how to ride the wave of artificial intelligence rather than hear lessons about its risks or calls for governments to intervene.
“Before AI becomes smarter than us, I think the people who develop it should be encouraged to put a lot of effort into understanding how it can try to take control of us, ” Hinton said.
“Now there are 99 highly intelligent people trying to make AI better, and one very intelligent person trying to figure out how to stop it from taking control, and maybe we should be more balanced. ”
Hinton warned that the dangers of artificial intelligence must be taken seriously.
“I think it ’ s important for people to understand that this is not science fiction or just fear, ” he said, adding:“ It ’ s a real risk that we have to think about, and we have to figure out how to deal with it first. ”
Hinton expressed concern that AI would deepen inequality, as the vast gains from its productivity would go to the rich, not the workers.
“Wealth will not go to the people who work, it will make the rich richer, not the poor, and this is a very bad society, ” he said.
He also pointed to the danger of “fake news ” that can be created by robots such as ChatGPT, hoping to mark the content generated by artificial intelligence programs as central banks mark coins.
He stressed that it is important to “try, for example, to distinguish everything that is fake as fake, ” and said,“ I don ’ t know if we can do it technically or not. ”
“The Island Net ”

**
- Hinton’s warnings are taken seriously because of his track record and expertise.

Title:

Content: Global News
The world today - the "godfather" of artificial intelligence reveals why he left Google
You are now following the news of the "godfather" of artificial intelligence reveals the reason for his departure from "Google" from the Department of World News and now we leave you with the full details
MOHAMMED, Abu Dhabi, May 2, 2023 06: 22 AM - Jeffrey Hinton, nicknamed "the father of artificial intelligence", revealed on Monday that he quit his job at Google last week, in order to speak publicly about the "dangers" of the technology he helped develop.
Hinton ’ s work on neural networks has shaped artificial intelligence systems that power many of today ’ s technology products.
Hinton, who worked part-time at Google for a decade, contributed to the tech giant ’ s AI development efforts, but has since had concerns about the technology and its role in its development.
In an interview with The New York Times, Hinton said, “I consolate myself with the common excuse: if I hadn ’ t done it, someone else would have done it. ”
Hinton attributed his decision to leave Google to his desire to speak freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, not to criticize the company, as he tweeted on Monday.
Google ’ s chief scientist, Jeff Dean, commented on Hinton ’ s decision: “He has made major breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, ” expressing appreciation for“ a decade of contributions to Google. ”
In a statement to CNN, Dean said: “We remain committed to a responsible approach to artificial intelligence.
We are constantly learning to understand emerging risks while boldly innovating. ”
Hinton ’ s decision to want to expose his concerns about artificial intelligence came as a growing number of lawmakers and groups raised warnings about the possibility of a new set of chatbots spreading fake information and eliminating a slew of jobs.
Hinton is not the first Google employee to alert to the dangers of artificial intelligence: in July, the company fired an engineer who claimed that an undisclosed intelligence system had become conscious, while many in the technical field strongly refused to confirm what the engineer said.
We hope that we have succeeded in conveying the full details of the news of the "spiritual father" of artificial intelligence reveals the reason for his departure from Google..
In God ’ s care and protection.
You may also read.

- Even among CEOs and tech leaders, there is significant fear that AI’s advancement could have destructive consequences within a decade.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What did Sam Altman admit about ChatGPT and the potential risks of AI?

Advanced AI could pose an existential risk to humanity.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

- Government regulators and independent groups are now starting to call for stronger oversight, including possible limits on how powerful AI systems can become without clear safeguards.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Poses ethical risks
Becomes uncontrollable

**Bottom Line Takeaways**
- Geoffrey Hinton resigned so he could ring the alarm: AI’s rapid development could have huge consequences for jobs, security, truth, and even control over humanity’s future.

What did Hinton, the renowned British-Canadian expert reveal about AI that caused widespread concern?

Exposed serious AI risks, shocking the tech world and affecting major company stocks.

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

Poses ethical risks
Becomes uncontrollable

What future risk did Hinton warn about AI?

What risks did Hinton associate with AI's rapid advancement?

What risks did the global summit report highlight about AI?

Creating malicious software for cyberattacks, potentially posing an existential threat if humans lose control.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

- His call is for more balance—more people working to make AI safe, not just stronger.

Title:

Content: Information Technology
The father of artificial intelligence urges governments to face its risks before disaster
Jeffrey Hinton, described as the father of artificial intelligence, on Wednesday urged governments to intervene to ensure that machines do not control society.
Hinton made headlines in May when he announced his resignation from Google to speak more freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, shortly after the launch of ChatGPT, which captivated the world.
The artificial intelligence scientist, who is studying at the University of Toronto, spoke to a crowd at the Collagen Technology Conference in the Canadian city.
The conference attracted more than 30,000 startup founders, investors and tech workers, most of whom were eager to learn how to ride the wave of artificial intelligence rather than hear lessons about its risks or calls for governments to intervene.
“Before AI becomes smarter than us, I think the people who develop it should be encouraged to put a lot of effort into understanding how it can try to take control of us, ” Hinton said.
“Now there are 99 highly intelligent people trying to make AI better, and one very intelligent person trying to figure out how to stop it from taking control, and maybe we should be more balanced. ”
Hinton warned that the dangers of artificial intelligence must be taken seriously.
“I think it ’ s important for people to understand that this is not science fiction or just fear, ” he said, adding:“ It ’ s a real risk that we have to think about, and we have to figure out how to deal with it first. ”
Hinton expressed concern that AI would deepen inequality, as the vast gains from its productivity would go to the rich, not the workers.
“Wealth will not go to the people who work, it will make the rich richer, not the poor, and this is a very bad society, ” he said.
He also pointed to the danger of “fake news ” that can be created by robots such as ChatGPT, hoping to mark the content generated by artificial intelligence programs as central banks mark coins.
He stressed that it is important to “try, for example, to distinguish everything that is fake as fake, ” and said,“ I don ’ t know if we can do it technically or not. ”
“The Island Net ”

- Society must balance innovation with safety, ensuring that the benefits of AI don’t lead to new risks or deepen divides.

Title:

Content: Information Technology
The father of artificial intelligence urges governments to face its risks before disaster
Jeffrey Hinton, described as the father of artificial intelligence, on Wednesday urged governments to intervene to ensure that machines do not control society.
Hinton made headlines in May when he announced his resignation from Google to speak more freely about the dangers of artificial intelligence, shortly after the launch of ChatGPT, which captivated the world.
The artificial intelligence scientist, who is studying at the University of Toronto, spoke to a crowd at the Collagen Technology Conference in the Canadian city.
The conference attracted more than 30,000 startup founders, investors and tech workers, most of whom were eager to learn how to ride the wave of artificial intelligence rather than hear lessons about its risks or calls for governments to intervene.
“Before AI becomes smarter than us, I think the people who develop it should be encouraged to put a lot of effort into understanding how it can try to take control of us, ” Hinton said.
“Now there are 99 highly intelligent people trying to make AI better, and one very intelligent person trying to figure out how to stop it from taking control, and maybe we should be more balanced. ”
Hinton warned that the dangers of artificial intelligence must be taken seriously.
“I think it ’ s important for people to understand that this is not science fiction or just fear, ” he said, adding:“ It ’ s a real risk that we have to think about, and we have to figure out how to deal with it first. ”
Hinton expressed concern that AI would deepen inequality, as the vast gains from its productivity would go to the rich, not the workers.
“Wealth will not go to the people who work, it will make the rich richer, not the poor, and this is a very bad society, ” he said.
He also pointed to the danger of “fake news ” that can be created by robots such as ChatGPT, hoping to mark the content generated by artificial intelligence programs as central banks mark coins.
He stressed that it is important to “try, for example, to distinguish everything that is fake as fake, ” and said,“ I don ’ t know if we can do it technically or not. ”
“The Island Net ”

What does Hinton warn could happen to AI if companies and regulators fail to implement effective rules and controls?

- The broader discussion is no longer just for tech experts—it's a fundamental question for our economy, politics, and daily lives.

**Summary of Key Points: Geoffrey Hinton’s Resignation and AI Warnings**

**Who is Geoffrey Hinton?

Title:

Content: The godfather of AI quit Google's job, worried that artificial intelligence fell into the wrong hands
WASHINGTON (AFP) - The US media reported today that Hinton, known as the "godfather of AI", resigned his job at Google to talk openly about the risks of AI and worry that AI will fall into the wrong hands.
He said that it is difficult to see how to prevent bad people from using it to do bad things.
Advertisement
Geoffrey Hinton, who laid the groundwork for artificial intelligence (AI) systems, told The New York Times that advances in AI pose “great risks to society and humanity. ”
In a report published today in the New York Times, Hinton was quoted as saying, “Look at what it looked like five years ago and now, and the difference and growth, it ’ s really scary. ”
Hinton pointed out that competition among tech giants has prompted these companies to release new AI technologies at a dangerous rate, which will endanger people ’ s jobs and spread misinformation.
"It's hard to see how you can prevent bad people from using it (AI) to do bad things," he told the New York Times.
OpenAI, the startup behind Google and now the most powerful AI chatbot, ChatGPT, began using more data than ever before to develop systems in 2022.
Hinton told the New York Times that he believes these systems are surpassing human intelligence in some ways because of the sheer volume of data they analyze.
"Perhaps these systems are already stronger than the human brain," he said.
While AI has been used to support human needs for work, the rapid development of chatbots like ChatGPT could put human jobs at risk.
He told the New York Times that AI is “taking on a chore, ” but“ it ’ s probably going to do more than that. ”
Hinton also warned that AI could spread false information, telling the New York Times that the average person would “no longer know what ’ s true. ”
According to the New York Times, Hinton tendered his resignation to Google last month.
Google ’ s head of AI, Jeff Dean, thanked Hinton in a statement to the US media.
"As one of the first companies to publish AI principles, we remain committed to taking a responsible approach to AI," the statement added.
"While we are bold and innovative, we are constantly discovering new risks."
Tech billionaire Elon Musk and many experts have called for a moratorium on the development of AI systems to allow time to ensure the technology is safe.
After the launch of the GPT-4, which is more powerful than the AI used by ChatGPT, Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak signed an open letter.
Hinton, who was not involved in the petition, told the New York Times that scientists shouldn ’ t “further scale research and development ” until they know if they can control AI.

Why did Hinton leave Google when he helped develop AI but later grew concerned about its dangers?

**
Geoffrey Hinton is a pioneer in artificial intelligence (AI), often called the "godfather of AI."

Title:

Content: AI Godfather Hinton: Artificial intelligence threatens humanity more urgently than climate change
Central News Agency
Geoffrey Hinton, a pioneer in artificial intelligence (AI), said in an interview with Reuters today that the threat posed by AI to humans may be “more urgent ” than climate change.
This is an advertisement, please continue reading.
Hinton, 75, who is regarded as one of the “godfathers ” of artificial intelligence, recently announced his departure from Alphabet, a 10-year tech company, because he wanted to make the risks of artificial intelligence public without involving employers.
Hinton ’ s research has been recognized as an important contribution to the development of contemporary AI systems. In 1986, he co-authored the influential paper Learning Representations by Back-propagating Errors, which set a milestone in the development of neural networks supporting AI technology. In 2018, he received the Turing Award for his research breakthroughs. And...
Hinton is one of a growing number of technology leaders who are concerned that machine intelligence will surpass humans and ultimately control the planet, and are openly raising concerns about the potential threat posed by AI.
“I ’ m not trying to downplay the importance of climate change, nor am I saying we shouldn ’ t worry about climate change, which is also a big risk, ” Hinton said.
But I think (artificial intelligence) may be more urgent in the end. "
“When it comes to climate change, making recommendations is simple: just stop carbon emissions.
If you do that, things will get better.
And when it comes to (artificial intelligence), there ’ s nothing we can do about it. ”
OpenAI, a U.S. artificial intelligence research lab sponsored by technology company Microsoft, launched ChatGPT, a chatbot that took the first shot at the AI race last November and quickly became the fastest-growing app in history, with 100 million monthly active users in just two months.
In April, thousands of people signed an open letter calling on all AI labs to suspend development of systems more powerful than OpenAI ’ s recently launched GPT-4 for at least six months, including social media CEO Elon Musk, AI pioneers Yoshua Bengio and Stuart Russell.
Hinton shares the concerns of the co-authors, who fear AI could pose an existential threat to humanity, but he disagrees with the suspension of research.
He said, “It ’ s not practical.
I agree that this is an existential risk, and it ’ s close, and it ’ s time to put a lot of effort into understanding what we can do. ”
Following the publication of the joint letter, the 12 members of the European Parliament called on leaders such as U.S. President Joe Biden and European Union Executive Committee Chairman Ursula von der Leyen to convene a summit to discuss how to control the development of advanced artificial intelligence systems such as ChatGPT, which are developing faster than expected.
“Technology leaders know best about [artificial intelligence], and politics must be involved, ” says Hinton.
This matter concerns all of us, so we must all think carefully. ”
This is an advertisement, please continue reading.

He has worked on research foundational to current AI systems, particularly through his development of neural networks and deep learning.

Title:

Content: AI ’ s “godfather ” interviewed by the BBC, warning that artificial intelligence may be smarter than humans
AI ’ s “godfather ” interviewed by the BBC, warning that artificial intelligence may be smarter than humans
Geoffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather ” of artificial intelligence (AI), has resigned from Google.
He warned that developments in the field of artificial intelligence pose increasing dangers.
In a statement to The New York Times, Dr. Hinton said he regretted his current job.
Dr. Hinton ’ s pioneering research in neural networks and deep learning paves the way for current AI systems such as Google ’ s Bard chatbot and Microsoft ’ s ChatGPT.
The cognitive psychologist and computer scientist told the BBC that chatbots may soon be smarter than humans.

What breakthroughs has Hinton achieved through his 40+ years of work on artificial neural networks?

Breakthroughs that mimic biological brains

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

These technologies power AI chatbots like Google Bard and OpenAI's ChatGPT.

Title:

Content: AI ’ s “godfather ” interviewed by the BBC, warning that artificial intelligence may be smarter than humans
AI ’ s “godfather ” interviewed by the BBC, warning that artificial intelligence may be smarter than humans
Geoffrey Hinton, known as the “godfather ” of artificial intelligence (AI), has resigned from Google.
He warned that developments in the field of artificial intelligence pose increasing dangers.
In a statement to The New York Times, Dr. Hinton said he regretted his current job.
Dr. Hinton ’ s pioneering research in neural networks and deep learning paves the way for current AI systems such as Google ’ s Bard chatbot and Microsoft ’ s ChatGPT.
The cognitive psychologist and computer scientist told the BBC that chatbots may soon be smarter than humans.

Which AI system demonstrates the foundation laid by Hinton's pioneering research in deep learning and neural networks?

**What Did Hinton Do at Google?

**
Hinton worked at Google for about 10 years, focusing on AI research and development.

Title:

Content: ChatGPT allows the world to see the unlimited potential of artificial intelligence (AI), and as technology giants have laid out the AI market, there are hidden concerns about its loss of control and its impact on the labor market.
Faced with the threat of competitors, Google (Google) actively invested in AI research and development, but at this time, the so-called "AI godfather" of Hunton (Geoffry Hinton) confirmed to leave Google, and the technology is uneasy, the development of AI has exceeded expectations.
As reported by CNN and The Verge, the company founded by Hunton and two students was acquired by Google in 2013. He has been working at Google for about 10 years, mainly engaged in AI research and development, and now one of the students is also the chief scientist of OpenAI.
But as his research into AI deepened, he became concerned about the technology.
“If I don ’ t do it, someone else will do it, ” admits Hunton, who usually persuades himself, but adds that“ it ’ s hard to prevent bad people from using AI to do evil. ”
Hunton said the reason for leaving Google was to talk about the risks of AI without fear, rather than attacking Google, stressing that “the measures Google has taken are very responsible. ”
Hunton warns that some jobs may be replaced by AI, which is moving faster than he and others expect, that science fiction movies are impossible to come true, and even that AI may generate code and run on its own, and that annihilating humans is not unthinkable.
Hunton said that AI can actually evolve smarter than humans. Some people believe this reasoning, but most still think it is far from true. “I thought it would take 30, 50 years or more, but now it ’ s changed. ”
In March this year, Tesla CEO Elon Musk led nearly a thousand technology CEOs and scientists jointly issued an open letter calling for a moratorium on the development of more powerful AI technologies because of the potential risks to society and humanity.
# AI # AI # AI # AI # AI # AI # AI # AI