Overtourism is described as a situation caused by the concentration of large numbers of tourists and has become a problem in many places.

Contributing causes include concentrated visitor demand at iconic sites and growing appetite for unique or 'Instagram‑worthy' experiences.

Post‑pandemic recovery of travel volumes has increased visitor numbers at some sites.

Short‑term rentals and the spread of holiday homes have driven up rental prices and displaced residents in some destinations.

Tourism can support employment and GDP while simultaneously correlating with inequality and high poverty in destinations that rely heavily on tourism.

Overtourism places stress on infrastructure and public services and can contribute to environmental problems such as untreated wastewater being discharged into the sea.

Operators sometimes intervene at natural sites to maintain visitor satisfaction, for example by augmenting waterfall flow with pipes during dry seasons.

Overcrowding at natural attractions can degrade visitor behavior, increase safety risks, and reduce the quality of the experience for both visitors and residents.

At Mount Fuji, crowding led Yamanashi Prefecture to introduce a daily limit of 4,000 climbers on its trail side and to charge a ¥2,000 toll to reduce congestion and fund management.

Mt. Fuji managers also set a gate at the 5th Station that closes access when the daily limit is reached and closes between 4 p.m. and 3 a.m. to deter risky 'bullet climbing.'

Bullet climbing at Mt. Fuji—ascending without staying in lodges—was flagged as raising the risk of hypothermia and altitude sickness.

On the Shizuoka side of Mt. Fuji, authorities have not imposed limits or tolls and are testing a smartphone pre‑registration system to track itineraries and reduce dangerous climbing behavior.

Policy responses elsewhere have included calls for tourist taxes, moratoria on new tourist accommodations, and residence laws to limit speculative real‑estate purchases by non‑residents.

Public protest has arisen in the Canary Islands under the slogan 'The Canary Islands have a limit' to challenge a tourism‑dependent development model.

The Canary Islands were projected to approach 17 million visitors in 2024 after a post‑pandemic recovery, intensifying local concerns over sustainability.

Some destinations have reported very large annual visitor numbers, for example the Yuntai Falls scenic area received more than seven million visitors in 2023.

Experts recommend demand‑management and traveler behavior measures such as visiting in shoulder seasons, choosing less‑visited sites, staying longer in fewer places, using local accommodation, and favoring public transport.

Travel experts also warn against simply transferring overtourism to quieter places and urge supporting locally owned businesses to spread benefits and avoid new local pressures.

Market analyses note that overtourism is a constraint and reputational risk for tourism segments, even as luxury and experiential travel expand.

Management actions used in the documents include visitor caps, entry fees to fund management, registration systems, monitoring of flows, and public information campaigns targeting both domestic and foreign visitors.

Monitoring and analyzing registration and visitor data is recommended to assess congestion and to determine whether further restrictions are necessary.

Summary: Overtourism in the contexts provided is driven by concentrated demand, post‑pandemic recovery, short‑term rentals, and attraction marketing; it produces social displacement, infrastructure and environmental strain, and mixed economic outcomes, and documented responses include caps, fees, registration systems, taxes, moratoria, and encouragement of off‑peak, locally supportive travel.

Conclusion: To address overtourism, combine demand‑management measures (limits, fees, registration), policy reforms (taxes, moratoria, housing rules), and traveler‑facing actions (off‑peak travel, support for local businesses) as shown in the cited cases.

Overtourism is described as a situation caused by the concentration of large numbers of tourists and has become a problem in many places.

Title:

Content: Restricting Mt. Fuji Climbers: Measures Necessary to Enable Safe Ascents of Legendary Peak

Mt. Fuji has long attracted people with its majestic presence. Many people hope to stand on its summit at least once. Sufficient measures must be taken to ensure safe and comfortable climbing.

The Yamanashi prefectural government has decided to limit the number of users of the trail on its side to 4,000 per day from July 1, the opening day of the climbing season. The move is aimed at reducing congestion. A toll of ¥2,000 per person will also be collected.

A gate will be set up near the entrance to the trail at the 5th Station, and access will be closed once the number of climbers reaches the maximum limit. The toll fees will reportedly be used for maintenance and management of the gate as well as for safety measures for climbers.

The number of climbers on Mt. Fuji totaled about 220,000 last summer, recovering to levels seen before the COVID-19 pandemic. The mountain trails get crowded, and there have been some cases of bad manners, such as the reckless overtaking of other climbers.

To preserve the appeal of the mountain and reduce the risk of accidents, certain restrictions are unavoidable. The toll should be considered a necessary cost to ensure safe and comfortable climbing.

“Bullet climbing,” in which people try to ascend to the summit by climbing all night without staying at a mountain lodge, has become a problem. It creates a high risk for hypothermia and altitude sickness. For that reason, the gate will be closed from 4 p.m. to 3 a.m. The move should help deter the dangerous climbing behavior.

The trail on the Yamanashi Prefecture side has the highest number of users, accounting for about 60% of the total climbers. To avoid confusion at the site, it is necessary to thoroughly make the restrictions known to the public. Efforts should also be made to publicize the restrictions among foreign visitors, whose numbers have been growing rapidly in recent years.

On the other hand, the three routes on the Shizuoka Prefecture side do not limit the number of climbers or collect tolls. Instead, a pilot system will be introduced to ask people register their climbing itineraries in advance via smartphones or other devices, so that the number of climbers can be tracked as part of an effort to prevent people from attempting bullet climbing.

This is because there are several roads leading to the trails, making it difficult to collect tolls from all climbers. However, the routes on the Shizuoka Prefecture side may become crowded in the future with those who try to avoid paying the toll.

For the time being, it is important to analyze data from the planned pre-registration system to grasp the congestion situation. Depending on the situation, it may be necessary to consider introducing a restriction on the number of climbers.

It is also important for each climber to be aware of the issues. Even if a long-awaited climb is achieved, the effort will all come to nothing if the climber suffers injury, illness or other troubles in the process. Ideally, climbers should take all possible precautions and make a sensible plan.

Overtourism, a situation caused by the concentration of large numbers of tourists, has become a problem in many places. How can the environment of tourist destinations be protected? Society as a whole must think about the issue.

(From The Yomiuri Shimbun, May 4, 2024)

Contributing causes include concentrated visitor demand at iconic sites and growing appetite for unique or 'Instagram‑worthy' experiences.

Title:

Content: Is China's highest waterfall fake? Here's the truth

A recent revelation about Yuntai Falls, China's highest waterfall, stirred controversy as a video showed water gushing from pipes, raising doubts about its authenticity. The park's operators admitted to minor enhancements during dry seasons to maintain visitor satisfaction, sparking debate over tourism ethics. This incident sheds light on broader issues of human intervention in natural sites, prompting reflection on sustainable tourism practices and the balance between preserving natural wonders and meeting tourist expectations.
A screengrab from the Douyin video which revealed that the famous Yuntai falls was actually being supplied by pipes. Source: Douyin
A recent revelation about Yuntai Falls, China’s highest waterfall, has caused a stir on social media and raised questions about the authenticity of tourist attractions. The waterfall, which is located in the Yuntai Mountain scenic area in Henan province, is a popular destination for visitors seeking to experience the natural beauty of the region. However, a video recorded by a hiker and shared on Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok, showed water gushing out of pipes at the top of the falls, suggesting that the waterfall is at least partly fed by artificial means.
Watch it here:

The video quickly went viral, amassing thousands of shares and sparking a debate among netizens. The scenic park’s operators were compelled to respond, admitting to what they referred to as a “small enhancement” during the dry season. They justified the action by stating it was done to ensure visitors who had traveled long distances would not be disappointed by a lack of water flow. This statement was released on their Weibo social media account, a popular platform in China.
The Yuntai falls are the tallest falls in China. Source: Courtesy of Yuntai Mountain Net

Yuntai Falls, revered as the highest waterfall in China with a vertical drop of 314 meters, has been a significant draw for the Yuntai Mountain scenic area. In 2023, the park attracted more than seven million visitors, according to local tourism authorities. The operators’ decision to use pipes to augment the waterfall’s flow during periods of low rainfall was intended to maintain the site’s appeal and visitor satisfaction.

The disclosure has prompted a mixed reaction from the public. Some social media users expressed understanding, acknowledging that many scenic spots resort to similar measures during dry spells to ensure a worthwhile visit. Others, however, criticized the park for deceiving tourists and potentially violating the Tourism Law of the People’s Republic of China, which mandates the authenticity and accuracy of information provided by tourism operators. The various social media platforms have also been rife with "Made in China" memes that have mockingly joked about the situation using the stereotypical phrase, which has served as a marker of badly made items for ages.
This incident has highlighted the broader issue of human intervention in natural sites and the lengths to which operators will go to preserve the allure of tourist attractions. While some argue that such enhancements are necessary to sustain tourism, especially during unfavorable seasons, others believe that they compromise the integrity of natural wonders and the visitor experience.
The conversation around Yuntai Falls is part of a larger discussion about the future of tourism and the environment. It raises important questions about the sustainability of tourism practices and the ethical considerations of altering natural sites for commercial purposes. As the world becomes increasingly connected and people seek out unique and Instagram-worthy destinations, the pressure on tourist sites to deliver exceptional experiences is higher than ever. The Yuntai Falls incident may prompt a reevaluation of how natural attractions are marketed and managed, ensuring that the wonder of these sites remains genuine for future generations to appreciate.

Russia-captured Foreign Fighter's Shocking Claims About Ukraine Army | 'TikTok, Deception & More...'

About the Author
TOI Lifestyle Desk

The TOI Lifestyle Desk is a dynamic team of dedicated journalists who, with unwavering passion and commitment, sift through the pulse of the nation to curate a vibrant tapestry of lifestyle news for The Times of India readers. At the TOI Lifestyle Desk, we go beyond the obvious, delving into the extraordinary. Consider us your lifestyle companion, providing a daily dose of inspiration and information. Whether you're seeking the latest fashion trends, travel escapades, culinary delights, or wellness tips, the TOI Lifestyle Desk is your one-stop destination for an enriching lifestyle experience.

End of Article
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Post‑pandemic recovery of travel volumes has increased visitor numbers at some sites.

Title:

Content: Today, on April 20, 2024, the Canary Islands are witnessing a widespread protest aimed at challenging the current development model heavily reliant on tourism. This significant event is set to occur simultaneously across all eight islands of the archipelago, as well as in various cities internationally including Málaga, Granada, Madrid, Barcelona, Amsterdam, London, and Berlin. The protests are unified under the slogan “The Canary Islands have a limit.”

Booking.com

The protest aims to reshape the development strategy on the islands, highlighting concerns about the tourism sector’s role in economic disparity and resource consumption. Despite tourism supporting approximately 40% of employment and being a primary contributor to the GDP, it’s also associated with creating inequalities and not distributing wealth effectively among the local population. This is exemplified by the Canary Islands recording their highest tourist numbers alongside their highest poverty rates in both 2017 and 2023.

Organizers clarify that the intent is not to expel tourists or eliminate the industry but to implement limits and conditions, and address governance that prioritizes economic gains over broader interests. Key issues fueling the protests include:

  1. Low Wages and High Poverty Rates: The Canary Islands have some of Spain’s lowest salaries and a significant poverty rate, affecting over 33% of the population. The islands have experienced rapid population growth, particularly in Tenerife and Fuerteventura, exacerbating these issues.
  2. Environmental and Infrastructure Concerns: Despite having numerous protected spaces, the islands face challenges such as insufficient protection agents and underdeveloped infrastructure in health, education, and sanitation. Notably, several islands struggle with untreated wastewater being discharged into the sea.
  3. Housing and Over-Tourism: The spread of holiday homes has dispersed tourists across the islands, impacting local communities by driving up rental prices and displacing residents. This issue is compounded by the government’s initiatives to attract digital nomads, further straining the housing market.
  4. Legal and Regulatory Challenges: Recent government stances on controversial tourism projects, like those on La Tejita beach and Cuna del Alma in Tenerife, have sparked outrage for perceived favoritism towards developers despite legal infractions.

The protest is seen as a venting mechanism for accumulated frustrations with the aim to initiate significant changes in how the islands develop and manage tourism. Proposals include imposing a tourist tax to fund environmental conservation, enacting a moratorium on new tourist accommodations, and establishing residence laws to curb speculative real estate purchases by non-residents.

This protest is part of a broader call to reconsider the islands’ economic models, prioritizing sustainability and equitable growth over mere economic output. This event might mark the beginning of a significant shift in policy and public discourse around tourism and development in the Canary Islands.

The Canary Islands are on track to set a new historical record for tourist arrivals in 2024, continuing a trend of increasing numbers which began in earnest following the pandemic. With official estimates indicating a potential total of around 17 million visitors for the year, this surpasses the previous high of 16.2 million in 2023. These figures are bolstered by a significant recovery in tourism since the slowdown during the COVID-19 years of 2020 and 2021.

This surge in tourism is seen as a double-edged sword. On one hand, it signifies a robust recovery and a boon for the local economy, driven by both foreign and domestic visitors. On the other, it underscores the challenges and pressures faced by the islands, particularly in terms of infrastructure, local community impact, and environmental sustainability. This has led to today’s widespread protests across the Canary Islands under the campaign “Canarias tiene un límite” (The Canary Islands have a limit), highlighting concerns over the sustainability of this growth model.

The protests reflect broader anxieties about the direction of tourism development, which, despite its economic benefits, is perceived to exacerbate local issues such as high poverty rates, environmental degradation, and the displacement of local communities due to rising housing costs. These concerns are amplified by predictions that the influx of tourists may continue to grow, particularly with the diversion of tourists from Eastern Mediterranean destinations affected by geopolitical tensions, such as the conflict in Gaza.

In response to these pressures, there is a growing call for more responsible tourism practices. Organizations like Exceltur advocate for strategies that alleviate the saturation of local spaces and services, promote more sustainable transportation options, and address the social impacts of tourism. This includes managing the explosive growth of vacation rentals, which have significant negative externalities on local residents.

The protests and the ongoing discourse represent a critical juncture for the Canary Islands, as the community seeks to balance the economic advantages of tourism with the need for sustainable development and equitable growth. The outcome of these discussions and the ability of the islands to adapt to these challenges will likely shape the future of tourism and community life in the archipelago.

Booking.com

Short‑term rentals and the spread of holiday homes have driven up rental prices and displaced residents in some destinations.

Title:

Content: Travel expert explains how to find ‘room to breathe’ in overcrowded destinations

Some of Europe's most popular destinations have struggled to cope with surging numbers of tourists this summer. Express.co.uk spoke to an expert to find out how British tourists can avoid the crowds.

“There’s more to these places than the box office tourist sites" (Image: Getty)

Whether or , some top destinations have struggled with overcrowding this summer.

As travel restrictions fade into the past, more tourists than ever seem to be heading out to explore. Unfortunately, this means some destinations have become overcrowded.

Express.co.uk spoke to Sarah Faith, senior values writer at Responsible Travel, to find out how British tourists can escape the crowds.

Sarah told Express.co.uk : “Travelling outside of peak times is one of the best ways to avoid the crowds in popular destinations. But you could also get off the beaten track a bit.

“There’s more to these places than the box office tourist sites. Find out what the locals love, explore the surrounding villages or spend time browsing local farmer, artisan and flea markets.”

Tourists have complained of crowds in Rome (Image: Getty)

Although tourists often feel pressure to tick off a destination’s top sites, they could have a more rewarding experience heading to quieter spots.

Sarah added: “You’ll have more room to breathe, and have a more authentic experience too. Plus, you’ll help spread out the weight and benefits of tourism more. A win for everyone.”

However, when it comes to getting off the beaten track, Sarah says there are a few factors tourists should consider before booking a holiday.

She told Express.co.uk: “There are plenty of quieter destinations that offer exceptional culture and landscapes.

"You can make sure your holiday supports local people by choosing locally owned guesthouses" (Image: Getty)

“It’s important though that we don’t just transfer the problems of overtourism to another place. You can make sure your holiday supports local people by choosing locally owned guesthouses rather than Airbnbs run by out of town professional hosts, eating in restaurants that serve locally sourced produce and hiring a local guide to show you around.”

While Airbnbs can be a convenient option, locals in some top destinations have complained the properties price them out of the housing market .

Sarah said: “Places like Barcelona, Venice and Dubrovnik are great to visit, but they’re people’s homes too.

“When tourism takes over, it prices local people out of the housing market, closes local amenities and erodes the local culture and social identity that made us want to visit in the first place.

“Locals might be the first to lose out from overtourism but left unchecked, it kills off the tourist experience too. It’s in everyone’s interest to tackle the problem.”

France recently launched a campaign to encourage tourists to visit some of the country’s hidden gems. Leading attractions such as .

Would you like to receive notifications from this site?

Title:

Content: HOMEPAGE

From where you go to what you do, experts share how to travel the world without destroying it

  • Traveling sustainably is about making intentional choices to serve your destination and planet well.
  • We asked experts how to make these choices when planning a trip to be as sustainable as possible.
  • This article is part of "Better Me," a series about improving your lifestyle and helping society through sustainable efforts and eco-consciousness.

Sustainable travel can feel like an oxymoron — as Justin Francis, the cofounder and CEO of Responsible Travel, a UK-based travel company that evaluates trips and vacation providers, told Insider.

The travel industry can create jobs, or it can lead to over-tourism that lowers residents' quality of life. Flights emit harmful emissions, but transport travelers to destinations where they can support local economies and participate in positive, nature-based tourism. Lodging accommodations can boost the local economy, or price residents out of their homes.

But Francis believes people can travel "in a way that not only reduces harm but actively maximizes the benefits, for both planet and people."

Five other sustainable travel experts who spoke with Insider agree and say there are actions travelers can take to lower their negative impact, support the destinations they're visiting, and have an overall better trip. They suggest considering every aspect of your trip — from where you go to how you get there — as you plan to travel more sustainably.

Kelley Louise, the executive director and founder of Impact Travel Alliance, a nonprofit centered on informing travelers to help improve the world, told Insider that traveling sustainably takes practice and being an imperfect traveler is better than not trying.

As Louise said, "It's about asking, 'How can you make little decisions that add up over time and have a positive impact on the world?'"

If you're looking for a place to start, here's what the experts Insider spoke with recommend.

First, choose a destination with the planet in mind

Go off the beaten path

Some of the experts Insider spoke with suggest skipping top tourist destinations and opting for under-the-radar spots.

"By seeking out the less-visited destinations, you will be helping to spread the economic benefits of tourism more widely and helping to avoid the negative impacts that over-tourism has on local residents," Georgina Davies — the communications manager for The Travel Foundation, a group that advocates for sustainable tourism — told Insider.

Paloma Zapata agrees. The CEO of Sustainable Travel International — an organization that works with local governments, businesses, and nonprofits to provide sustainable travel opportunities — also recommends visiting a hidden gem. If you're going to Greece, for instance, you could skip Mykonos and head to an island like Anafi or Ios with fewer tourists.

Once you've picked your destination, Davies encourages travelers to visit the region's national parks and protected areas. Often these places have entrance fees, which support conservation efforts.

Choose a destination that embraces sustainability

Jessica Blotter, CEO and cofounder of public benefit corporation Kind Travel, told Insider she looks for destinations with tourism boards that have a dedicated sustainable travel section on their website.

She recommends avoiding areas where sustainable transportation and lodging are hard to find, and "where access to nature and the outdoors is limited."

Vacation during shoulder season

Tossing a coin in the Trevi Fountain without hordes of people around or exploring Niagara Falls in the winter isn't just beneficial to travelers; experts say it also supports sustainability.

Visiting destinations during shoulder seasons "spreads the benefits of tourism locally across the year and lightens the burden of over-tourism in popular destinations," Francis said. His company, Responsible Travel, has a guide that outlines the best time to visit certain destinations

Zapata added that you're also more likely to have a stress-free and special vacation if you're visiting when there are fewer crowds. "It could be even more enriching," she said. "When you're on a beach or on a sailboat and it's just surrounded by masses of people, maybe that's not the best experience."

Visit fewer places for longer

One way to travel more responsibly is to visit fewer places for longer periods of time. For example, instead of spending a week in four European countries, plan a 10-day trip to one or two.

"Fewer but longer trips mean fewer air miles, more money in local hands, and you'll have a more relaxing trip, too," Francis said. "If you can, keep shorter trips close to home or travel by land or sea." He added that these modes of travel can be an adventure in themselves, and allow you to "see so much more of a destination."

If you must travel a long distance, Blotter recommends stretching the trip as much as possible to maximize your experience. "Booking multiple, long-haul trips per year is not sustainable or carbon-friendly," she said.

Consider how you get there

Evaluate the distance for the most sustainable way to get there

The first step in deciding how to responsibly get to your destination is considering the number of people traveling and the distance you're going.

Besides biking and walking, trains are typically one of the most sustainable ways to travel, Zapata said. If your destination is accessible by train, consider that.

If you're debating whether it's more sustainable to fly or drive, Zapata said it comes down to the distance.

"A lot of times trains are going to be more energy and carbon efficient," she said. "But when it comes to a car, there comes a moment when flying is actually more carbon efficient than driving when you're talking about very long distances."

Calculators like the ones offered by the International Civil Aviation Organization and Environmental Defense Fund can help travelers map out the least carbon-intensive way to get from A to B.

If you need to fly, opt for nonstop routes and travel in economy

Flying will likely be the most unsustainable aspect of your trip. Aviation makes up about 2% of global carbon emissions and 80% of a vacation's carbon footprint comes from the flight, according to National Geographic.

Experts suggest thinking about how much you should fly in a year. For example, maybe you take one international flight a year and prioritize having the rest of your trips close to home, Louise said.

But no matter where you jet off to, experts recommend flying nonstop in economy.

"When booking long-distance plane travel, always choose a direct flight with no layovers," Blotter said. "Direct flights use less carbon dioxide than connecting flights."

Additionally, by flying in economy, as some of the experts Insider spoke with pointed out, you maximize the number of people a flight can carry by taking up less space.

Ultimately, though, the best thing you can do is reduce your carbon footprint during your trip.

Experts like Louise and Gregory Miller, the executive director of the international nonprofit Center for Responsible Travel, agree that carbon offsets act more like a Band-Aid than a solution to sustainable travel. But if they do decide to purchase carbon offsets, which reduce or remove emissions to compensate for those made during a trip, Miller suggests purchasing through a reliable, vetted program. Groups like Zapata's Sustainable Travel say they invest people's money into carbon-reducing projects centered on clean energy and biodiversity.

Think about how you pack

Pack light

The simplest advice when it comes to being a sustainable packer is to pack less, Zapata said. "Travel light," she said.
"You don't need 20 shoes to travel."

Blotter agrees and says that by packing lighter, you'll reduce carbon emissions. That's because the lighter the aircraft, train, car, or boat, the less energy is needed.

Louise added that by packing fewer items and using a carry-on, you'll get through security faster and avoid the hassle of checking a bag.

Pack reusable items

Francis suggests adding the items you use at home to your packing list. That might include a reusable water bottle, a bag for shopping, and utensils to avoid plastic cutlery.

Louise acknowledges that it might not be feasible for every traveler to carry a reusable water bottle, so she urges travelers to consider what other meaningful swaps they could make. For example, Louise said she swapped liquid shampoo and conditioner for shampoo and conditioner bars a few vacations back. The bars are lighter than liquid soaps, which means they save carbon emissions during transportation. Plus, many are packaged in recyclable paper instead of plastic.

The switch became permanent in Louise's daily life, she said, adding that it made traveling easier since she didn't have to worry about leaks or liquids at airport security. "It's a cool example of how we can look for more sustainable experiences that are also better travel experiences," she said. "Plus it opens our eyes to new habits that can help us become more conscious consumers as well."

Pack brands you support

If you're doing some pre-vacation shopping, Louise recommends buying from brands that place sustainability at the forefront of their business.

"If you're supporting corporations and brands that are working on sustainability as well, then that's going to move the needle and create change a lot quicker than we could as individuals," she said.

For tropical getaways, pack reef-safe sunscreen

If you're heading to Aruba or planning a diving trip in Belize, experts say travelers should ensure reef-safe sunscreen is on their packing lists.

"Sunscreen can be very damaging to the environment and not everybody knows," Zapata said.

Ingredients in everyday sunscreen can harm both coral reefs and local wildlife, according to the National Ocean Service. Look for a reef-safe sunscreen that lacks harmful ingredients like oxybenzone, octinoxate, nano titanium dioxide, and nano zinc oxide.

Where you stay matters, too

Look into a hotel's claims about sustainability

Between countless certification programs and eco-friendly branding, experts agree that it can be tricky trying to evaluate whether or not a hotel is actually contributing to a destination.

When researching different accommodations, look for specifics beyond being "eco-friendly" and giving up plastic straws, Miller says. He suggests looking for hotels with written policies about how they work with local communities, prevent food waste, and help environmental initiatives like reforestation and supporting local dive sites.

If they don't have that information, Louise urges travelers to ask questions: "If they are authentically sustainable, they'll be excited to answer them."

Blotter encourages travelers to choose accommodation options that are upfront about their environmental efforts.

"Hotels that are truly eco-friendly should have a sustainability statement and clearly stated initiatives visible on their website," Blotter said. "While sustainability certifications are great and make it easier for travelers to identify sustainable lodging, not all hotels embracing eco-friendly practices will boast such certifications."

Blotter said to look for certifications from organizations that look into the foundation and practices of locations, businesses, and facilities to see if they meet their standards for sustainability and environmentalism. Some of these include the Global Sustainable Tourism Council, Certified B Corporation, and Green Globe, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, and WELL Building Standard.

Although some certifications indicate a hotel is sustainable, Zapata and Miller said guests shouldn't book solely based on certifications since they can be costly for smaller resorts and hotels to acquire. "If they've made a commitment to the communities, to the destination, and they understand that they're part of the community that is what's important," Miller said.

Once you arrive, Zapata said guests should look for evidence that their accommodation is following the claims it makes. Speak to housekeeping staff, check in with chefs about the food they're serving, and see if you get new towels each morning — if you do, you could help save water by skipping this service.

Stay at mom-and-pop hotels and inns

Picking a locally owned bed-and-breakfast over an Airbnb or big hotel is going to have a more positive impact on the local community, some of the experts Insider spoke with said.

"Short-term Airbnb-type holiday rentals might feel convenient, but they're having a devastating impact on some popular destinations — pricing people out of their homes and wiping out whole communities," Francis said. "Consider opting instead for a local homestay, B&B or local-owned hotel."

Make smart decisions throughout your stay

Use public transportation

If possible, experts suggest skipping a rental car. Instead, turn to the destination's public transportation.

"Don't discount your travel in the destination," Francis said. "Try and avoid internal flights, and consider ditching the private car or tour bus. There are loads of great human-powered, local-guided tours around — by foot, bike, or even kayak."

Eat local foods

Besides the flight to your destination, food waste will likely be the second-largest contributor to your vacation's carbon footprint, according to National Geographic.

"We traditionally don't think of sustainable tourism as something like, 'Oh, I can lay on the beach and have a cocktail, and that could have a positive impact on the world,'" Louise said. But if you think about where your food comes from and the story behind that, it can have a positive impact, she added.

That means seeking ingredients that are grown nearby instead of shipped across the country and checking to make sure restaurants are hiring locals and paying them fair wages. By evaluating restaurants on these items, you'll likely get "fresher and better foods that are unique to that destination," Louise said.

Seek off-the-beaten-path activities

Most experts agree that when it comes to exploring a destination, it's worth turning to locals for advice. That might mean joining a local Facebook group, sparking a conversation on a public bus, or finding a community-based tourism program.

"Look for ways to seek out local voices and to understand how they want their destination seen," Louise said. By talking to locals, you're likely to avoid contributing to over-tourism and have a more unique experience, she added.

Another way you can approach activities is by centering your plans around a cause you and your group care about, such as ocean conservation or LGBTQ rights, Louise said.

Once you've settled on a topic, look at how your actions and the activities you choose can support that cause. For example, you might eat at restaurants owned by diverse staff or seek voluntourism opportunities to protect a nearby beach.

Blotter recommends avoiding experiences that use animals as entertainment like elephant rides, and looking for charity-run activities instead.

When you're back from the activity, whether it was a volunteer job or a locally-recommended hike, Miller said travelers should "brag about it." He encourages people who are traveling responsibly to post about their experience and use word-of-mouth to inspire others.

Buy local

Pass on the manufactured magnets, mass-produced T-shirts, and generic keychains. Instead, Zapata said travelers should search for items that are unique and crafted by locals.

"If you're going to buy a memento, buy something that's actually made there," she said. That way you ensure the money spent on the souvenir is directly supporting the community.

While all of these decisions you make as an individual matter, Miller says that ultimately "the solution to everything is to get governments and major corporations to change and reduce their emissions period."

According to Miller, that's something travelers can do in the voting booth that can go a long way.

Better Me tips for sustainable living

Slide through the following cards to read more expert advice on sustainable living. Then check out the rest of the stories from Insider's Better Me series.

Sign up for notifications from Insider! Stay up to date with what you want to know.
Subscribe to push notifications

Keep reading

Edit Series es-vitalfarms-2022 sp-2022-bm-travel

Tourism can support employment and GDP while simultaneously correlating with inequality and high poverty in destinations that rely heavily on tourism.

Overtourism places stress on infrastructure and public services and can contribute to environmental problems such as untreated wastewater being discharged into the sea.

Operators sometimes intervene at natural sites to maintain visitor satisfaction, for example by augmenting waterfall flow with pipes during dry seasons.

Overcrowding at natural attractions can degrade visitor behavior, increase safety risks, and reduce the quality of the experience for both visitors and residents.

At Mount Fuji, crowding led Yamanashi Prefecture to introduce a daily limit of 4,000 climbers on its trail side and to charge a ¥2,000 toll to reduce congestion and fund management.

Mt. Fuji managers also set a gate at the 5th Station that closes access when the daily limit is reached and closes between 4 p.m. and 3 a.m. to deter risky 'bullet climbing.'

Bullet climbing at Mt. Fuji—ascending without staying in lodges—was flagged as raising the risk of hypothermia and altitude sickness.

On the Shizuoka side of Mt. Fuji, authorities have not imposed limits or tolls and are testing a smartphone pre‑registration system to track itineraries and reduce dangerous climbing behavior.

Policy responses elsewhere have included calls for tourist taxes, moratoria on new tourist accommodations, and residence laws to limit speculative real‑estate purchases by non‑residents.

Public protest has arisen in the Canary Islands under the slogan 'The Canary Islands have a limit' to challenge a tourism‑dependent development model.

The Canary Islands were projected to approach 17 million visitors in 2024 after a post‑pandemic recovery, intensifying local concerns over sustainability.

Some destinations have reported very large annual visitor numbers, for example the Yuntai Falls scenic area received more than seven million visitors in 2023.

Experts recommend demand‑management and traveler behavior measures such as visiting in shoulder seasons, choosing less‑visited sites, staying longer in fewer places, using local accommodation, and favoring public transport.

Travel experts also warn against simply transferring overtourism to quieter places and urge supporting locally owned businesses to spread benefits and avoid new local pressures.

Market analyses note that overtourism is a constraint and reputational risk for tourism segments, even as luxury and experiential travel expand.

Title:

Content: Luxury Travel Market to grow π at CAGR of 7.8% | Driven by increasing Customized and Private Vacations Type Segments

Luxury Travel Market

The global Luxury Travel market was valued at USD 1,328.1 bn in 2022 and is expected to reach USD 2,762 bn in 2032. [+highest CAGR of 7.8%]

NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK, UNITED STATES, March 20, 2023 /EINPresswire.com/ -- Market Overview:

Luxury travel refers to high-end travel experiences that are characterized by exclusivity, luxury, and personalized services. Luxury travel can include everything from private jet charters, luxury cruises, and five-star hotels to immersive cultural experiences and adventure travel. The demand for luxury travel experiences is driven by the increasing disposable income of the population, the desire for unique and personalized experiences, and the growing popularity of experiential travel among millennials.

What's the Latest for 2023?

β Competitiveness and percentages of key competitor markets

β Multiple geographies have strong/active/niche market presence

β Online interactive peer-to-peer collaborative bespoke updates.

North America is the largest market for luxury travel due to the high disposable income of its population and the availability of luxury travel options. The Asia-Pacific region is the fastest-growing market due to the rising middle-class population and the increasing popularity of luxury travel among millennials.

**To Get more information about this report, Click the Link and Drop The Request Sample [+US Crisis Impact 2023] β¦ https://market.us/report/luxury-travel-market/request-sample/

Top Key Trends:

- The growing popularity of adventure travel and experiential travel.
- The increasing use of technology in luxury travel, such as virtual reality and artificial intelligence.
- The demand for sustainable and eco-friendly luxury travel experiences.
- The trend towards smaller, more intimate travel experiences.

Top Impacting Factors:

- Increasing disposable income of the population.
- Desire for unique and personalized experiences.
- Growing popularity of experiential travel among millennials.
- Technological advancements in the luxury travel industry.
- Demand for sustainable and eco-friendly travel experiences.

Key Benefits for Stakeholders:

- The luxury travel market provides opportunities for tour operators, hoteliers, and other travel service providers to expand their businesses.
- High-net-worth individuals benefit from the availability of exclusive and personalized luxury travel experiences.
- Tourism boards and governments benefit from the increased tourism revenue generated by the luxury travel market.

Directly Buy using this secure link: https://market.us/purchase-report/?report_id=11839

Market Dynamics:

Drivers:

Increasing disposable income of the population.
Desire for unique and personalized experiences.
Growing popularity of experiential travel among millennials.
Technological advancements in the luxury travel industry.

Restraints:

High cost of luxury travel experiences.
Economic and political instability in certain regions.
Increasing concerns about overtourism.

Opportunities:

Growing demand for sustainable and eco-friendly luxury travel experiences.
Increasing popularity of adventure and experiential travel.
Use of technology to enhance the luxury travel experience.

Challenges:

High cost of luxury travel experiences.
Economic and political instability in certain regions.
Overtourism and its negative impact on local communities and the environment.

Key Market Segments:

Based on the Type of Tours
Customized and Private Vacations
Adventure and Safari
Cruise/Ship Expedition
Small Group Journey
Celebration and Special Events
Culinary Travel and Shopping
Others

Based on Age Group
Millennial
Generation X
Baby Boomer
Silver Hair
Others

Based on Types of Traveler
Absolute Luxury
Aspiring Luxury
Accessible Luxury

Top Key Players in Luxury Travel Market:

TUI Group
Butterfield & Robinson Inc.
Cox & Kings Ltd.
Scott Dunn Ltd.
Abercrombie & Kent USA, LLC
Lindblad Expeditions
Geographic Expeditions, Inc.
Micato Safaris
Exodus Travels Ltd.
Travel Edge (Canada) Inc.
Other Key Player

Recent Development:

- In August 2021, Marriott International announced the opening of its new luxury hotel, The St. Regis Bermuda Resort, which features 120 guestrooms and suites, multiple dining options, and a spa.

- In June 2021, Abercrombie & Kent announced the launch of its new private jet journey, "The World's 10 Best National Parks," which takes travelers to some of the world's most stunning national parks.

- In April 2021, Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts announced the opening of its new luxury hotel, the Four Seasons Hotel San Francisco at Embarcadero, which features 155 guestrooms and suites, a rooftop bar, and a fitness center.

- In February 2021, luxury tour operator Black Tomato announced the launch of its new immersive travel experiences, which include a private island escape in Belize and a desert adventure in Jordan.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

1. What is the future market value for Luxury Travel Market?

2. What is the growth rate of the Luxury Travel Market?

3. What are the recent trends affecting the Luxury Travel market?

4. What are the different types of Luxury Travel used?

5. Who are the key players in the Luxury Travel market?

6. Who are the key end-users of the Luxury Travel market?

7. Which region is lucrative for the Luxury Travel market?

Explore More Reports:

Foley Catheter Market is estimated to grow by USD 2,868 Mn by 2032 | North America to Account for 31.8%
https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2023/03/06/2621555/0/en/Foley-Catheter-Market-is-estimated-to-grow-by-USD-2-868-Mn-by-2032-North-America-to-Account-for-31-8.html

Cancer Cachexia Market To Generate Revenue Of 4,034 million by 2032 | CAGR of 4.8%
https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2023/03/07/2621700/0/en/Cancer-Cachexia-Market-To-Generate-Revenue-Of-4-034-million-by-2032-CAGR-of-4-8.html

Blood Glucose Meters Market Predicted to Garner USD 22.6 Billion By 2032, At CAGR 8.7% | Market.us
https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2023/03/07/2622373/0/en/Blood-Glucose-Meters-Market-Predicted-to-Garner-USD-22-6-Billion-By-2032-At-CAGR-8-7-Market-us.html

Medical Transcription Software Market Worth Over USD 190.2 Billion by 2032, At CAGR 9.60%
https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2023/03/07/2622453/0/en/Medical-Transcription-Software-Market-Worth-Over-USD-190-2-Billion-by-2032-At-CAGR-9-60.html

Global Luxury Travel Market to Exceed USD 2,762 Billion by 2032 | CAGR 7.8%
https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2023/03/08/2622998/0/en/Global-Luxury-Travel-Market-to-Exceed-USD-2-762-Billion-by-2032-CAGR-7-8.html

Wearable Medical Devices Market To Develop Strongly And Cross USD 165.5 Bn By 2032 | CAGR 19.1%
https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2023/03/08/2623067/0/en/Wearable-Medical-Devices-Market-To-Develop-Strongly-And-Cross-USD-165-5-Bn-By-2032-CAGR-19-1.html

Commercial Refrigeration Equipment Market to Reach USD 65.2 Billion by 2032, at a CAGR of 5.3%
https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2023/03/08/2623473/0/en/Commercial-Refrigeration-Equipment-Market-to-Reach-USD-65-2-Billion-by-2032-at-a-CAGR-of-5-3.html

Embedded System Market Predicted to Garner USD 173.4 Billion by 2032, At CAGR 6.8%
https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2023/03/08/2623477/0/en/Embedded-System-Market-Predicted-to-Garner-USD-173-4-Billion-by-2032-At-CAGR-6-8.html

At CAGR 9.3%, Food Colorants Market Will Reach USD 10 Billion by 2032
https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2023/03/08/2623541/0/en/At-CAGR-9-3-Food-Colorants-Market-Will-Reach-USD-10-Billion-by-2032.html

Electric Truck Market Worth Over USD 11.08 Billion by 2032, At CAGR 31.3%
https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2023/03/09/2623657/0/en/Electric-Truck-Market-Worth-Over-USD-11-08-Billion-by-2032-At-CAGR-31-3.html

Medical Marijuana Market To Develop Strongly And Cross USD 30 Bn by the end of 2032
https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2023/03/09/2624094/0/en/Medical-Marijuana-Market-To-Develop-Strongly-And-Cross-USD-30-Bn-by-the-end-of-2032.html

Industrial Robotics Market Value to Hit US$ 142.8 Billion in 2032, At CAGR 11.4%
https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2023/03/09/2624175/0/en/Industrial-Robotics-Market-Value-to-Hit-US-142-8-Billion-in-2032-At-CAGR-11-4.html

Stefen Marwa
Prudour Pvt Ltd
+1 718-618-4351
email us here
Visit us on social media:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Other

Management actions used in the documents include visitor caps, entry fees to fund management, registration systems, monitoring of flows, and public information campaigns targeting both domestic and foreign visitors.

Monitoring and analyzing registration and visitor data is recommended to assess congestion and to determine whether further restrictions are necessary.

Summary: Overtourism in the contexts provided is driven by concentrated demand, post‑pandemic recovery, short‑term rentals, and attraction marketing; it produces social displacement, infrastructure and environmental strain, and mixed economic outcomes, and documented responses include caps, fees, registration systems, taxes, moratoria, and encouragement of off‑peak, locally supportive travel.

Conclusion: To address overtourism, combine demand‑management measures (limits, fees, registration), policy reforms (taxes, moratoria, housing rules), and traveler‑facing actions (off‑peak travel, support for local businesses) as shown in the cited cases.


A Russian article reports that many university regulations and administrative rules in Russia restrict public comments by staff and encourage self-censorship.

The same article describes reliance on state funding and the use of grants and procurement processes as levers that increase staff dependence and fear of repercussions for speech.

An Office for Students commentary explains that new legislation in England will create a free-speech complaints scheme and publish guidance to help universities meet legal free-speech duties.

The documents provided concentrate on academic freedom, institutional regulation, and funding pressures rather than on language planning or policies to curb lexical borrowings.

I found no specific descriptions in the supplied materials of laws, governmental programs, or interventions aimed at preventing borrowings into a state language or specifically limiting borrowings from English.

Conclusion: The provided documents do not contain information about government measures or laws specifically intended to prevent lexical borrowings into state languages, including from English.

A Russian article reports that many university regulations and administrative rules in Russia restrict public comments by staff and encourage self-censorship.

Title:

Content: OD "Russian version"
Science between prison and suma
Employees of Russian universities are rapidly turning into a precariat, completely dependent on the employer and state funding.
The fear of losing their jobs keeps scientists quiet and prevents them from protesting even when it would seem impossible to tolerate it any longer.
Anna Rara-Avis
7 December 2021, 4.58
In an attempt to improve the life of Russian universities, the government of the Russian Federation and the Ministry of Education and Science are creating more and more new projects, programs, orders are issued, additional rules are introduced, grant financing is organized.
It seems that two or three more orders, and we will find ourselves at the goal: domestic universities and science will break into the international space, bypass competitors in various ratings, attract leading professors of the world and solvent students to their walls.
But something's going wrong.
Experts usually consider underfunding of science and education as a key problem.
Indeed, in Russia, as noted in the UNESCO report, the share of spending on science in recent years has been declining: in 2014, spending amounted to 1.07% of Russian GDP, and in 2018 – 0.99%.
"Even in the conditions of the target parameters of the national project" Science ", spending will increase to 1.2% of GDP by 2024.
Despite the fact that the largest scientific and technical countries spend more than 3% of GDP for these purposes, ” said Galina Izotova, Deputy Chairman of the Accounts Chamber.
But there is another problem that seriously hinders Russian science.
Russian researchers and university staff work in a situation of lack of freedom of speech, in permanent fear, rapidly turning from the elite into precariums – completely dependent on the will of employers, not provided with social guarantees, politically disorganized social class.
Public Silence
Mass polls to answer the question of whether people are afraid to express their opinion are not conducted as often.
The last resonant study on this topic was published in 2016 by the Levada Center: 26% of respondents (6% of them are definitely afraid to express their opinion about the state of affairs in the state in conversations with sociologists, 23% - in conversations with colleagues, 17% - with relatives and friends.
The majority of respondents (56%) explained the cautious attitude to the study of public opinion with fear of negative consequences for themselves.
What is the dynamics to date – it is difficult to say for sure, there was no re-study.
However, according to political scientist Margarita Zavadskaya, "now the norm of social behavior in society is caution."
This so-called "syndrome of public mute" applies not only to conditional average citizens, but also to universities, faculty.
Even those who, it would seem, should communicate directly and openly with their audience (for example, pro-rectors for work with students), prefer (or have no other choice) to minimize public discussions and not express their opinions.
Teachers are silent not only in classrooms, but also in meetings, councils, during surveys conducted by senior management, and even in social networks.
Publicly it is appropriate to share information about successes and achievements, but it is unacceptable to talk about problems, criticize management decisions.
In many ways, such public mute is the result of university regulations on the principles of corporate behavior.
As a rule, they concern public comments of employees (including statements in social networks) on socially significant and political topics.
Universities can position such regulations in different ways, the main argument is that the university should be about science and outside of politics.
Valery Fadeev, the head of the Human Rights Council under the President of the Russian Federation, believes that the prohibition of students and employees of the Higher School of Economics to make public statements, including the signing of open letters, is not a restriction on freedom of speech.
According to Fadeev, this is only "an attempt to minimize politicization and attacks on the HSE."
However, regulations are not always prohibitive.
Often, university employees engage in self-censorship.
In November 2021, I interviewed members of a Facebook group devoted to higher education (almost 10,000 people), asking an open question (open questions cannot be answered “yes ” or“ no ”, they assume that the options will be formulated by the respondents themselves), similar to the one that was asked to the Russians by the Levada Center in 2016: “In your opinion, your colleagues in the field of science education are afraid to publicly express themselves. What is your opinion on the current situation in the country? ”
The most "liked" answer (punctuation and spelling saved):
"Definitely yes.
You always look back when you write an opinion on a particular issue.
It's not even discussed.
It ’ s really scary to write, and you can ’ t write the whole truth anymore.
This is due to the overall political situation in the country.
No one wants to go to prison because of the approval of someone ’ s opinion or because of the statement of his own.
And also with a lack of understanding of the rules of the game, what can be said and what can not be said.
I ’ m scared to write that. ”
There were also such statements:
“I think it was easier before the transition.
The rules of the game were much clearer.
The power to criticize in public was simply forbidden.
And now it is not clear, sometimes you read this - well, for sure, a person will sit down, and nothing like he wrote.
And sometimes there is information that a person likes some nonsense put an article on him. "
"Yes, after the collapse of the judicial system in January-February of this year, I stopped expressing my opinion publicly, since you can go to jail even for reposting an anecdote."
“We don ’ t see the opposition at all.
But there is the opposite.
There are some professors (obviously cuddling ducks) who discuss with students how good it was in the Soviet Union or how bad America was.
It is very aggressive propaganda.
Students sometimes complain about it. ”
Careful people
Such extreme caution in discussions is a stopper for the development of society.
Views, ideas and opinions that could be expressed by educated intellectuals and communicated to the general public do not find their audience.
Those who used to be called the "white bone", who formed public opinion, are now forced to remain silent.
If you look at the truth, today ’ s university staff are actually in a precarious employment situation.
First, their social situation is precarious: a short-term contract may simply not be extended.
The grounds in this case, as a rule, are tied to formal indicators, but in fact it is a convenient tool for putting pressure on employees who allow themselves excessive freedom of speech and participate in acts of political solidarity.
Second, precarious employment is characterized by poor social security.
The loss of a job in most Russian universities threatens a long-term loss of employment in general: when there is only one university in the city, it is almost impossible to change a job – except to change the career trajectory by getting a cashier in a trading network.
The consequence of such insecurity is the willingness of university staff to meet any unreasonable demands, without making the slightest attempt to defend their rights – for example, in everything that concerns the super-requirements for publication activity.
For example, in some universities, along with the requirements for writing articles, citation requirements were introduced: at the beginning of the year, employees must declare how many times the article will be mentioned in other publications by the end of the year.
Often, university employees are required to attribute the name of the rector to all their scientific publications.
The teaching staff massively and submissively, without resisting, simulates scientific publications, scientific citation, science in general - they do not risk expressing their opinion, fearing negative consequences.
For precarious employment is characterized by the lack of many social guarantees.
The income of university staff is unstable: the grounds for the payment of allowances at most universities are extremely variable and not always feasible.
A quote from the survey illustrates this situation well:
“It ’ s very dangerous to say what you think, how things really are.
External universal approval in the universities does not mean anything.
People are just really afraid.
The first thesis is also approved, the opposite thesis is also approved.
The main thing is that it comes from the boss.
To lose a job now in some cities, especially small and medium-sized ones, is almost equivalent to physical death.
Social security is hard on us.
The level of approval of all nonsense is now almost as under Stalin.
And in the vows, too.
Only under Stalin the delusions were less and there was a general logic.
And now the logic is ragged, all clip and contradictory.
It will not end well. ”
The lack of freedom of expression also makes it impossible to express professional solidarity.
A recent story about the arrest of Shaninka ’ s rector, Sergei Zuev, showed that public support turned out to be a matter of brave and protected people – not just all decent people.
The teaching staff of universities cannot afford to express solidarity not only because of external restrictions and self-censorship: they are in a vulnerable position, where the only real task is to keep their jobs.
Those who call for change see the evil: suddenly their prayers will be selected and the small that is.
Prudence is becoming a “staple ” of higher education
Managers in the field of education to such subordinates sincerely rejoice: no whining, no criticism (by the way, the favorite argument of managers when assessing the effectiveness of their work - everyone is happy, no one criticizes), one continuous "approves" and, if you do not go into the essence, but judge by the reports, there is an appearance of activity.
This is how the management cycle is formed: cautious people are recruited into the subordination of cautious people, and prudence becomes the “fastener ” of higher education.
Public procurement, grants and other vulnerabilities
One way to reduce the precariousness of scientific work is through reliable and transparent funding – from a variety of sources.
However, many foreign funds were forced to leave Russia, and cooperation with the remaining carries risks - today you can get financing, and tomorrow you will be a foreign agent.
The system of public procurement and grants only increases the dependence of university employees on the Russian authorities – instead of becoming a good tool for scientists to calculate their planning horizon and feel more confident.
Separately, it is worth highlighting public procurement for works, the results of which are not the supply of tangible goods or standard services, but all kinds of research (research work), research and development (R & D) and analytical reports, for which it is difficult to establish clear criteria for assessing results.
So, in the end, it all comes down to an examination, where the word of one expert can be put against the word of another.
This situation makes such contracts very "corruption-intensive".
Which of the experts to consider conscientious, and which – not, usually decides the investigation, based on their ideas about the examination.
Thus, the head of the Russian branch of Transparency International sees the problem in the fact that an important role in the case of Sergei Zuev is played by the expertise of the Russian Academy of Education, which challenged the quality of Shaninka ’ s performance of state contracts.
It was the examination conducted by the Academy, which is headed by ex-Minister of Education Olga Vasilyeva, "helped" the Ministry of Internal Affairs to identify the fact of embezzlement of funds.
"For a long time, there were no claims to the works performed [Shaninka], and only after a few years they appeared, - Ilya Shumanov, General Director of Transparency International (Russia), is perplexed. - Moreover, these claims are not considered in the course of a civil process, as it should be, but a criminal case is immediately initiated...".
And adds: "... a large number of criminal cases against the rectors, which I know, were completely justified.
There were embezzlement and confirmed information on illicit enrichment. "
The situation with Shaninka is complicated by the fact that the contracts were concluded under the procedure of public procurement, and, as can be seen from the website of public procurement, both contracts were subsequently terminated at the initiative of the customer (a specific state body with which public procurement took place).
Obviously, for this reason, claims to Zuev are not expressed for the full amount of contracts (a total of about 50 million rubles), but only for the part that, apparently, was actually paid - about 21 million rubles.
We do not know all the details and details of the relationship between Shaninka and the state customer - it is quite possible that this amount of work was provided.
Moreover, the fact that law enforcement officers rely on the examination of the results of the work, suggests that some results were still provided.
In ordinary business, such a situation is a dispute of economic entities, which would be resolved in a civil court, and criminal prosecution could appear only after the identification of undeniable evidence of fraud, along with evasion of compensation for damage.
However, in the case of public procurement, proceedings based on the results of work under contracts terminated on terms agreed by both parties begin immediately with criminal prosecution, arrest and detention.
In my opinion, such situations were meant when the phrase "enough nightmare business" was first sounded.
Legitimate and Illegal Violations
At the same time, if you look at the grants of the RSF through the optics of Dissernet, it turns out that among the scientists who regularly receive large grants, there are many leaders of the so-called “factories of fake dissertations ”.
A significant part of the articles required for grant reports contains unscrupulous borrowings; it is expected that the texts will be checked for plagiarism by scientific journals, but they, as the experience of the Council for the Ethics of Scientific Publications shows, do not always have the resources for this (both financial and intellectual).
This is neither a specific nor unique situation.
When data fabrication is paid extra, it ’ s dishonesty in Cuba.
Unfortunately, universities, in pursuit of the number of publications, rather than their quality, regularly give their employees allowances for almost any violation of ethics: for plagiarism, garbage articles, written and purchased authorship.
There are also cases of public procurement in so-called predator journals, where articles are published without a review procedure, and the very reason for the existence of these journals is to help unscrupulous authors report on grants.
The researcher can simulate publication activity in a variety of ways, and in most cases this practice will be supported, since universities report publications to ministries.
When they pay extra for data fabrication, it ’ s dishonesty in Cuba.
It is suddenly discovered that there are legitimate and illegitimate violations.
Legitimate - plagiarism, forgery and the purchase of authorship.
Illegitimate are embedded in the system of grants and public procurement so that it was impossible to guess in advance that the grantee violated something.
This is largely due to the lack of qualification of those who formulate the terms of reference on behalf of the customer: it does not allow them to formulate the requirements qualitatively.
This is superimposed by an extremely asymmetrical schedule for the publication of competitions, a large proportion of which is announced at the end of the third and fourth quarters - with deadlines until the end of the year, which is simply impossible for a conscientious participant.
Therefore, ordinary businesses that are not affiliated with the state or law enforcement agencies often consider the money received through public procurement to be toxic due to high risks.
Grants stand out, which, on the one hand, are not so strictly regulated by law, but, on the other hand, require strict compliance with targeted spending of funds.
Given the long term of such grants - in several years - the fulfillment of these conditions is almost impossible.
And then the leader of the team is faced with a dilemma.
On the one hand, it may formally comply with all conditions at the expense of actual results, which may subsequently be regarded as "lack of intention to do the work".
On the other hand, he can "score" on the formalities and achieve results in fact - risking being accused of "misuse of funds."
At the same time, the range of situations is quite wide - from banal changes in prices in the market to changes in the socio-political situation.
In the Facebook group mentioned above, I asked a question about the attitude towards grants and public procurement at universities.
I wanted to understand how university employees themselves treat them: how transparent and understandable are the conditions for interaction with the state, whether this interaction helps to move forward - or whether it has such pitfalls that it is better not to get involved once again.
“I ’ m talking about public procurement.
We need food samples at the RTA for our classes.
It all comes through public procurement.
It's just a nightmare, how many papers you need to buy only in a certain store, when all the documents are signed.
For example, I have a class tomorrow on salted fish or boiled sausage.
I have to buy something fresh today and bring it to class tomorrow.
But no, buy on a certain day a month before classes (or even more or later), put in the freezer and a month later you need to identify.
But in the ROC issued a certain amount of money to the laboratory and, as a rule, all samples were purchased at the right time.
Then the report. ”
Are there any foreign grants?
We used to have INTAS and CRDF grants, but that all stopped a long time ago. ”
"I know about the real case when the professor went to a rally, and the ministry decided to stop funding the grant for which he worked (and note - not one, but as part of a team of scientists).
To make others unhappy... "
"You are engaged in socio-political research, for example, you receive funding from a foreign fund and fall under the law (on foreign agents)."
It seems that we have come to a situation where grants and public procurement are gradually becoming a lever of pressure.
Not only can they be given or not given, but they can also initiate a criminal case based on the results of the implementation of projects.
Scientific work is now organized in such a way that foreign grants can not be taken, and state grants and public procurement - it is possible, but taking them, you are a hostage.
Although it is obvious that the objectives were initially different, the very desire for transparency and clarity in the system of budget allocation was not aimed at such consequences.
One way or another, the dependent position of employees and heads of universities is aggravated – although, logically, grants and the opportunity to participate in public procurement should provide additional opportunities, rather than select them.
Is there a chance for change for the better?
Of course.
We will only have to start with the decriminalization of controversial situations in the case of public procurement and grants for universities, with a tolerant attitude to freedom of speech, with an increase in the status of scientists in our country, their social protection.
And this, paradoxically, requires not only political will, courage and courage, a willingness to look not only at the reports, but also at the facts.
While scientists are afraid and trying to silence them, Russian science will not break out.
For its development, it is important that not only those who can adapt and survive, but also intelligent people who have their own opinion and self-esteem (and this is by no means a silent majority) remain and come into this sphere.
It is they who can bring science and education to the leading positions in the world, and not the voiceless precarians and drummers of mental labor, who spend their potential on the formation of unnecessary reports, on a profitable and safe simulation of scientific activity.
oDR openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

The same article describes reliance on state funding and the use of grants and procurement processes as levers that increase staff dependence and fear of repercussions for speech.

An Office for Students commentary explains that new legislation in England will create a free-speech complaints scheme and publish guidance to help universities meet legal free-speech duties.

Title:

Content: Comment

Free speech will return to our great universities

A high quality university experience depends upon it, and the OfS’s work will seek to ensure it

One in seven students does not feel free to express their views on campus. Studies have shown more than 30 per cent of academics self-censoring – about twice the rate of most European countries. And the UK has slipped to about sixtieth place in the global Academic Freedom Index. We know there is a problem with free speech in English higher education.

Changes are coming to how it is protected. Following new legislation, the Office for Students (OfS) – the independent regulator of higher education in England – will launch a new complaints scheme.

The scheme will be free to use for students, staff at universities and visiting speakers who believe that their free speech rights have been constrained. Only lawful free speech is protected. So speech which incites violence, or racial hatred, or is otherwise illegal, is not protected. But there is no protection in law from feeling offended. Indeed, an effective higher education includes exposure to views which are unpopular and difficult.

This week the OfS has published draft guidance to help universities, colleges and students’ unions to navigate their responsibilities under the new legislation. It includes hypothetical examples to show these organisations both where free speech might have been constrained, and what they may have to do to secure it.

The examples cover various issues – from global politics, to gender, to relationships with overseas regimes that may undermine free speech in English higher education.

We outline, in particular, an example where a university accepts international students on visiting scholarships funded by a foreign government. The scholars must accept the principles of that government and receive direction from it via consular staff. Such an arrangement may undermine free speech and academic freedom at the university. We will consider each case on its facts, but if there is suppression of free speech or academic freedom within the law, the university would likely be required to change or terminate this scholarship agreement.

This example is fundamentally important. Any international arrangement that undermines free speech or academic freedom risks higher education providers breaching their new duties. Free speech at our universities is not for sale to any foreign government or agency. Universities and colleges should make sure, now, that all their teaching and research activities uphold the relevant free speech requirements.

Of course international students contribute enormously to the academic and cultural life of our universities, and they bring wider economic benefits too. It is entirely understandable that universities want to attract students from around the world. They help to preserve and enhance the (much deserved) global reputation of higher education in England.

It is also true that the higher education sector faces a number of financial challenges. Last year, we warned that one of these was an overreliance on fees from international students. We wrote to 23 institutions seeking assurance that they had contingency plans in place in case recruitment patterns change.

But while a warm welcome to international students should persist, universities and colleges must not permit any situation where academics bite their tongues and students look over their shoulders in fear of authoritarian regimes that seek to undermine their freedoms. Universities are alive to the risk of overreliance on international students. That risk cannot, and will not, excuse any organisation from meeting its legal free speech duties.

I am confident that many universities, colleges and students’ unions are already upholding free speech and academic freedom within the law. They rightly see this as an essential part of their work, and something which is crucial for students from all backgrounds to flourish. A high quality university experience depends upon it, and the OfS’s work will seek to ensure it.

Arif Ahmed is director for freedom of speech and academic freedom at the Office for Students

License this content

The documents provided concentrate on academic freedom, institutional regulation, and funding pressures rather than on language planning or policies to curb lexical borrowings.

I found no specific descriptions in the supplied materials of laws, governmental programs, or interventions aimed at preventing borrowings into a state language or specifically limiting borrowings from English.

Conclusion: The provided documents do not contain information about government measures or laws specifically intended to prevent lexical borrowings into state languages, including from English.