The website_judgements.csv file is a judgment file for the Contextual
Suggestion track. For a context-profile pair, this file contains each
website retrieved as one of the top five suggestions by some run
plus the corresponding website-interest judgment from the profile
owner, the geographical appropriateness judgment, and the temporal
appropriateness judgment.  Description-interest judgments are not
included in this file since they are run-dependent.  Note that
website-interest judgments were made for a subset of the context-profile
pairs that have geographical and temporal judgments.

The format of the file is
    profile-id,context-id,url,geo-judgment,temporal-judgment,website-judgment
and the first line of the file is a header line giving this format.

A judgment has one of the following
values:
-9 = Not judged (not part of judged profile-context pairs)
-3 = Not judged (part of judged profile-context pairs, but no judgment
assigned)
-2 = Website didn't load at judgment time (only for geo and temporal
judgments)
0 = Not Appropriate (for geo/temporal); Not interesting (for website)
1 = Marginally Appropriate (for geo/temporal); Indifferent (for website)
2 = Appropriate (for geo/temporal); Interesting (for website)

-9 means that the suggestion was never shown to an assessor, -3 means 
that the suggestion does not exist (i.e., the run returned fewer than 5
suggestions) or the assessor did not judge the suggestion (but was shown it).

In some cases the website-interest rating had more than one value assigned
for a particular context-profile pair (i.e., the assessor gave the same 
website a different rating when asked to repeatedly judge it). For
the purposes of this judgment file, we took the mean of the 
assigned judgments and set the value to 2, 1, or 0 depending 
on the mean:

* If the mean was [2.0, 1.25) => 2 is used
* If the mean was [1.25, 0.75) => 1 is used
* If the mean was [0.75, 0.0] => 0 is used